ML18230A020: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMXC SAFETY AND LXCENSING BOARD IN THE MATTER    OF CAROLINA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY            Docket Nos. 50-400 50-401 (Shearon Harris Nuclear Power                        50-402 Plant, Units 1, 2, 3 and 4)                            50-403 OUTLINE .OF TESTIMONY OF CARLOS G. BELL QUALIFICATIONS Education:    Doctor of Science, Harvard University, 1955. Graduated Oak Ridge School    of Reactor Technology in 1955.
Work and Teachin    Ex erience:  Taught at Oak Ridge School  of Reactor Technology for 7 years; and Reactor Safety Division at Oak Ridge for 5 years. Taught at North-western University for 4 years. Taught at University of North Carolina at Charlotte for 4 years. Presently Chairman of Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, UNC in Charlotte.
SPECXFIC TESTXMONY On  contentions C.l(a) and (b):
This brief 'statement is concerned with certain envi-ronmental monitoring problems'that should be anticipated for the unlikely event of a major release of radioactivity from
 
the Shearon IIarr'is Nuclear Plant.
So  far as I'now, all  who have examined  the reactor power problem agree  that there is a small possibility that dangerous levels of radioactivity might be released. Al-though there are emergency procedures incorporated in the safety analysis of each plant, they rely, as far as I am aware, upon messages  being transmitted from the nuclear plant where the accident occurs to the authorities in nearby centers.
1  suggest that population centers that might  lie downwind from  potential nuclear reactor accidents should have their own independent atmospheric nuclear radiation detection system. Such system should substantially increase the chances that populations could be informed that an acci-dental release-had occurred.}}

Latest revision as of 17:26, 20 October 2019

Outline of Testimony of Carlos G. Bell
ML18230A020
Person / Time
Site: Harris  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/18/2018
From: Bell C
Univ of North Carolina - Charlotte
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
Download: ML18230A020 (2)


Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMXC SAFETY AND LXCENSING BOARD IN THE MATTER OF CAROLINA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY Docket Nos. 50-400 50-401 (Shearon Harris Nuclear Power 50-402 Plant, Units 1, 2, 3 and 4) 50-403 OUTLINE .OF TESTIMONY OF CARLOS G. BELL QUALIFICATIONS Education: Doctor of Science, Harvard University, 1955. Graduated Oak Ridge School of Reactor Technology in 1955.

Work and Teachin Ex erience: Taught at Oak Ridge School of Reactor Technology for 7 years; and Reactor Safety Division at Oak Ridge for 5 years. Taught at North-western University for 4 years. Taught at University of North Carolina at Charlotte for 4 years. Presently Chairman of Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, UNC in Charlotte.

SPECXFIC TESTXMONY On contentions C.l(a) and (b):

This brief 'statement is concerned with certain envi-ronmental monitoring problems'that should be anticipated for the unlikely event of a major release of radioactivity from

the Shearon IIarr'is Nuclear Plant.

So far as I'now, all who have examined the reactor power problem agree that there is a small possibility that dangerous levels of radioactivity might be released. Al-though there are emergency procedures incorporated in the safety analysis of each plant, they rely, as far as I am aware, upon messages being transmitted from the nuclear plant where the accident occurs to the authorities in nearby centers.

1 suggest that population centers that might lie downwind from potential nuclear reactor accidents should have their own independent atmospheric nuclear radiation detection system. Such system should substantially increase the chances that populations could be informed that an acci-dental release-had occurred.