ML070580537: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[LIC-07-0017, Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Data Report for July 1 Through December 31, 2006]]
| number = ML070580537
| issue date = 02/22/2007
| title = Fort Calhoun, Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Data Report for July 1 Through December 31, 2006
| author name = McManis J L
| author affiliation = Omaha Public Power District
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000285
| license number = DPR-040
| contact person =
| case reference number = LIC-07-0017
| document type = Letter, Report, Miscellaneous
| page count = 5
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:444 South 16th Street Mall Omaha NE 68102-2247 February 22,2007 LIC-07-0017 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
 
==Reference:==
Docket No. 50-285
 
==SUBJECT:==
Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Data Report In accordance with 10 CFR 26.71(d), attached please find the Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Data for the six-month period from July 1 through December 3 No commitments are made to the NRC in this letter. If you have any questions, please contact Theresa Petersen at (402) 533-7325.
ger - Nuclear Licensing Employment with Equal Opportunity LIC-07-00 17 Attachment Page 1 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10 CFR 26 Omaha Public Power District December 3 1.2006 Company 6 Months Ending Fort Calhoun Nuclear Power Station Location Tem Petersen (402) 533-7325 Contact Name Phone (include area code)
Cutoffs: ScreenIConfirmation (nglml) Appendix A to 10 CFR 26 Marijuana 50 / 15 Amphetamines 1000 / 500 Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyclidine 25 / 25 Opiates 300 / 300 Alcohol (% BAC) 0.04 *Two contractor employees' refbsals to test treated as positive **One contractor employee's refusal to test treated as positive Short-Term Contractor Personnel 942 # Tested 1674 4 3 378 30 0 2089 Long-Tenn Contractor Personnel Testing Results Average Number with Unescorted Access Categories Pre-Access
# Positive 7
* 0 2 2** 0 0 11 # Tested Licensee Employees 896 For Cause # Positive # Tested ' 85 3 3 580 30 701 Post Accident Observed behavior # Positive 0 0 0 1 0 1 Random Follow-up Other (re-entry)
Total LIC-07-00 17 Attachment Page 2 Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances
* NRC Required Level
**OPPD Required Level A 1 1 */12** Refusal to Test 3 3 Phency- clidine Licensee Employees Long-Term Contractors Short-Term Contractors Total Alcohol 3 3 Opiates Arnphe- tarnines Marijuana 4*/5** 4*/5** Cocaine 1 1 LIC-07-0017 Attachment Page 3 I. MANAGEMENT ACTIONS A. One contractor employee refused a random drug/alcohol test. The individual was denied unescorted access and returned to his employer.
B. Two contractor employees refused a pre-access test. Both individuals initially provided specimens that were out of the required temperature range. One individual refused to provide a second specimen and the other refused to provide a sufficient amount (under direct observation).
These individuals were denied unescorted access and returned to their employers.
One contractor employee tested positive for alcohol on a follow-up test (the contractor employee was placed in the follow up program by another utility).
After the breath alcohol test was confirmed on a different type of testing equipment (Intoxilyzer 5000), the employee was offered an opportunity to have his blood drawn and elected to do so. The employee was denied unescorted access and returned to his employer.
Upon receipt of the specimen, the laboratory found that the seal was not affixed and refused to test it. The Medical Review Officer reported the result as a positive based on the breath alcohol tests; the employee appealed, and a hearing was held. The internal management review concluded that since the final confirmation test was not completed due to a fatal error (unsealed specimen), the test would be deemed not to exist and the test results were removed fiom the record. Personnel associated with the collection of specimens were informed of this error and actions to prevent recurrence were established.
D. One OPPD employee tested positive for cocaine on a random test. The employee was suspended, complied with Employee Assistance Program (EAP) initial procedures, signed a Re-Entry Agreement and returned to work.
E. One OPPD employee tested in the range of 0.02% to 0.04% Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) on a random test. Although not considered a positive test, per OPPD procedures, the individual was referred to the EAP for a Chemical Dependency Evaluation. The EAP had some recommendations, which the individual agreed to complete.
F. Four contractor employees tested positive for marijuana on pre-access tests. The individuals were denied unescorted access and returned to their employers.
G. One contractor employee tested positive for marijuana on a random test. The individual's unescorted access was revoked and he returned to his employer.
H. One contractor employee tested positive for alcohol on a pre-access test.
The individual was denied unescorted access and returned to his employer.
LIC-07-0017 Attachment Page 4 I. Two contractor employees tested positive on "for cause" tests due to the smell of alcohol. The individuals were denied unescorted access and returned to their employers.
: 11. EVENTS REPORTED None}}

Latest revision as of 05:41, 13 July 2019

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML070580537&oldid=1830048"