ML18078B060

Trip Report by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff of the NUPIC Joint Utility Team Audit at Joseph Oat Corporation

ML18078B060
Person / Time
Issue date:	04/05/2018
From:	Kerri Kavanagh NRC/NRO/DCIP/QVIB2
To:	Mcginty T Division of Construction Inspection and Operational Programs
Herrity T, NRO/DCIP
References
Download: ML18078B060 (6)

Text

April 5, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO: Tim J. McGinty, Director Division of Construction Inspection and Operational Programs Office of New Reactors FROM: Kerri A. Kavanagh, Branch Chief

/RA/ RMcIntyre for Quality Assurance Vendor Inspection Branch-2 Division of Construction Inspection and Operational Programs Office of New Reactors

SUBJECT:

TRIP REPORT BY THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF OF THE NUPIC JOINT UTILITY TEAM AUDIT AT JOSEPH OAT CORPORATION On February 26 - March 2, 2018, staff from the Office of New Reactors (NRO), Division of Construction Inspection and Operational Programs, Quality Assurance Vendor Inspection Branch-2, observed the performance of a Nuclear Procurement Issues Committee (NUPIC) joint utility audit of Joseph Oat Corporation, Camden, NJ. NextEra Energy led the audit, with participation from Korean Hydro Nuclear Power, Public Service Electric and Gas Company , Dominion Energy, Exelon, & Entergy. The auditors used the NUPIC checklists to guide the review. The purpose of the staff's observation was to assess the NUPIC quality assurance audit process used for suppliers of components to the nuclear industry. The trip report of the staff's observations is enclosed.

Enclosure:

As stated CONTACT: Raju B. Patel, NRO/DCIP/QVIB

-2 (301)415-3511

ML18078B060 NRO-002 OFFICE NRO/DCIP NRO/DCIP NRO/DCIP NAME THerrity RPatel KKavanagh (RMcIntyre for)

DATE 03/23/18 04/05/18 04/05/18 Enclosure NUCLEAR PROCUREMENT I SSUES CO MMITTEE AUDIT OBSERVATION TRIP RE PORT Vendor Audited: Joseph Oat Corporation 2500 Broadway Camden, NJ 08104 Lead Licensee: NextEra Energy (NEE)

Lead Contact: Joe Piotrowski Nuclear Industry Activity: Joseph Oat Corporation, (hereafter referred to as JOC), designs and manufactures safety

-related shell and tube heat exchangers and similar built

-up components for the nuclear power industry. These components are provided in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50 Appendix B, and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers NQA

-1 Standard.

Observation Dates: February 26 - March 2, 2018 Observers: Raju B. Patel NRO/DCIP/QVIB

-2 Thomas Herrity NRO/DCIP/QVIB

-2 Management: Kerri Kavanagh NRO/DCIP/QVIB-2 Purpose: This trip report documents observations made by members of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Office of New Reactors (NRO), Division of Construction Inspection and Operational Programs (DCIP), Quality Assurance Vendor Inspection Branch

-2, during a joint utility audit conducted on February 26 - March 2, 2018, at the Joseph Oat Corporation facility located in Camden, NJ. Background/Purpose The Nuclear Procurement Issues Committee (NUPIC) was formed in 1989, by a partnership involving all domestic and several international nuclear utilities. The NUPIC program evaluates suppliers furnishing safety

-related components and services, and commerci al-grade items to nuclear utilities. The NUPIC audit team followed the NUPIC audit process and plans to provide the results to NUPIC members that procure components from Joseph Oat Corporation (JOC).

This audit was performed using the NUPIC Audit Checklist, Revision 20. The purpose of the audit was to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the JOC Quality Assurance (QA) Program. This audit team consisted of eight persons (seven auditors & one technical specialist), accompanied by two auditors in-training. The audit team was led by NextEra Energy (NEE) and included representatives from Korean Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP), Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG), Exelon (EXL), Dominion Energy, NEE, and Entergy.

The purpose of the NRC staff's observation of this audit was to verify, by direct observation, the effectiveness of the NUPIC audit process to qualify vendors in accordance with the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and 10 CFR Part 21.

The NRC staff implemented Inspection Procedure 43005, "NRC Oversight of Third

-Party Organizations Implementing Quality Assurance Requirements," during the observation.

Discussion JOC provided its QA manual and other implementing procedures to the NUPIC audit team after arrival at the facility due to the sensitivity of its contents. After the entrance meeting, the JOC management provided the NUPIC audit team and the NRC staff a tour of the JOC facilities. The NUPIC audit team reviewed the implementation of the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 in the QA program and supporting implementing procedures, evaluated the documentation associated with the activities that had been performed, and discussed the activities with JOC personnel. The NUPIC audit team observed work practices to verify activities were in accordance with applicable procedures.

The quality areas reviewed during the audit included the following: design control, commercial

-grade dedication (CGD), software QA, procurement, material control, special processes, tests and inspections, document control, training, organization, nonconforming items, corrective actions, internal audits, QA records and 10 CFR Part 21. In addition, a technical specialist assisted the NUPIC audit team on the review of special processes. The NUPIC audit team asked questions related to Safety Culture during audit activities on the shop floor. Based on each auditor assignment, the NUPIC team spent approximately 1/4 to 1/3 of its time on the shop floor, as opposed to time reviewing documents in the office. The NUPIC audit team conducted daily team meetings to discuss their observations and findings.

For the audit observation, two NRC staff members each verified a sample of the audit checklist review areas. The NRC staff observed the NUPIC audit team members perform their portions of the audit. Specifically, the NRC staff observed NUPIC's review and evaluation processes for the implementation of JOC's QA program for ensuring licensee procurement requirements, design requirements, ASME Section III code requirements, and associated design specifications were adequately incorporated into design and commercial

-grade dedications.

The N RC s taff observ ed t he daily t eam m eetings to verify that the N UPIC a udit t eam w as adeq uately addr essing issues and effectively v erifying t he implementati on of QA p rogram requirements.

The NRC s taff obs erved s hop manufacturing activities s uch as w elding and nondestructiv e activities.

The N RC s taff noted t hat the NUPIC au dit team engaged t h e NRC throughout the audit, and w hen requested, p rovided c larification on regulatory pos itions. The NRC s tall al so had access t o al l i nteractions b etween JOC and the NUPIC audi t team, as w ell as ac cess t o the sam e records reviewed by t hem. During t he ex i t m eeting, the NUPIC audi t t eam p resented 6 pot ential findings t o J OC management, i ncludi ng areas s uch as 10 CFR P art 21, m eas uring and t est e quipment, nonconforming material, parts or c omponents, QA R ec ords, s upplier ov ersight, and internal audits. In addition, the NUPIC audi t team pr esented 6 deficiencies i n the a reas o f c ontract review, ex ternal audi ts, c orrec tive actions

, c ommercial-g rade dedic ation, d ocument c ontrol, and test c ontrol. The N UPIC audit t eam l ead i nformed J OC m anagement that he intends to recommend t o NUP IC, a m id-c ycle lim ited-s c ope audit o f J OC to verify J OC e ffectively addresses t he findings a nd deficiencies.

Wit h the exception of the potential audi t findings i dentified, the N UPIC aud it t eam de termined that J OC w as e ffectively implementing i ts QA p rogram for the program el ements t hat w ere audited. In addi tion, t he NUPIC audi t team c oncluded that t he findings ha d no impact on product q uality. Conclusions The N RC s taff noted t hat t he N UPIC audi t t eam w as t echnically c apable and effe ctively engaged t he v endor, asking t he right questions a nd challenging the vendor as r equired.

Furthermore, t he N UPIC audit t eam w as e ffective at c ommunic ating w ith each other.

The N RC staff c ontinues to note t hat t he NUPIC au dit team needs t o m aintain an appropriate bal ance between tec hnically f ocused performance bas e auditing and c ompleting the NUPIC audi t c hecklist.

The N RC under stands that the s ize of t he N UPIC audit t eam relative to t he num ber o f v endor employees, m ay hav e a detrimental e ffect on bo th the v endor's pr oductivity dur ing the audit, and the v endor's abi lity t o support the audit team. I n t he future, N UPIC may w ant t o consider the size of t he c ompany w hen determining the s iz e of t he N UPIC team. The N RC c onc l uded that t he N UPIC c hecklist w as e ffectively i mplemented and resulted i n appropriate per formance-b ased findings.

The NRC s taff found t hat the NUPIC audi t team adequately addr ess ed the specific a reas o f t he c hec klist on which the N RC s taff foc us ed their review. List of Participants Name Title Affiliation Entrance Exit Joe Piotrowski Team Leader NEE X X Kim Jung-min Auditor KHNP X X Lim, Gyu-Dong Auditor-trainee KHNP X X Kurt Bittner Auditor PSEG X X Paul Macuiba Auditor Exelon X X David Breneman Auditor Dominion X X Michael Hedden Auditor-trainee Dominion X X Kirk Nordmeyer Auditor NEE X X Mike McCann Auditor Entergy X X Thomas Malota Technical Specialist NEE X X