ML12338A439

Official Exhibit - ENT000056 -00-BD01 - FTK-ESPP-G00019, Rev. 2, Entergy Nuclear Engineering Qualification Card

ML12338A439
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	03/28/2012
From:	Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 22102, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01
Download: ML12338A439 (6)

Text

ENTERGY NUCLEAR ENGINEERING FTK-ESPP-G00019QUALIFICATION CARD R EV 2 IMPLEMENTING THE FLOW ACCELERATED CORROSION (FAC) PROGRAM Page 1 of 6 Trainee Name:

_____________________________ Employee Number:

____________

Task/Topic Number:

FTK-ESPP-G00019 Evaluation:

The trainee has completed an interview covering the listed objectives and familiarization topics, and has demonstrated satisfactory knowledge, abilities, and skills regarding this topic/task to perform the assigned

duties.

Mentor/Task Qualified Evaluator Signature Title Date Qualification (by Manager):

The trainee has successfully satisfied the task requirements and is authorized to perform the associated duties independently.

Qualifiers Signature Title Date Qualification Review (Training Management):

Signature Title Date Training Records Updated:

Matrix Signature Date Send completed form to Training Records

Comments or Notes:

(This section is provided to document any additional information or comments as deemed appropriate by the trainee or mentor.)

ENT000056 Submitted: March 28, 2012 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit In the Matter of

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)

ASLBP #:07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #:05000247 l 05000286 Exhibit #:

Identified:

Admitted: Withdrawn:

Rejected: Stricken: Other: ENT000056-00-BD01 10/15/2012 10/15/2012 ENTERGY NUCLEAR ENGINEERING FTK-ESPP-G00019QUALIFICATION CARD R EV 2 IMPLEMENTING THE FLOW ACCELERATED CORROSION (FAC) PROGRAM Page 2 of 6 Trainee Instructions:

After completing the prerequisite coursework, review the learning objectives to become familiar with the knowledge to be obtained by completing this qualification card. Using the

listed references, acquire the knowledge needed to satisfy the stated learning objectives

through self-study, discussions with other incumbents or subject matter experts, or

practical experience. Arrange an interview with the mentor to evaluate the learning

achieved and discuss the listed familiarization topics. Bring this card to the mentor

interview. Perform a practical or exercise, or provide a detailed discussion of task

performance, as directed in the learning objectives.

Mentor Instructions:

Conduct the mentoring/evaluation in accordance with Nuclear Management Manual EN-TQ-104 procedure, Attachment 9.5. Review the learning objectives and discuss with the

trainee. Evaluation of the trainees mastery of the learning objectives is expected.

However, qualitative evaluations may be used. For example, trainee mastery could be

assessed using the following techniques:

• Asking hypothetical or situation questions and having the trainee provide an

answer.

• Asking the trainee to state, describe, paraphrase, or discuss the requirement.

• Asking the trainee what referenced documents (above) provide guidance about the

requirement.

• Asking the trainee to explain how applicable forms are completed.

Some learning objectives may require use of the applicable referenced documents

because of the infrequent need to use the knowledge, the extent and complexity of

presentation, or the level of detail and amount of material to be covered. Except when

noted by an asterisk (*) behind the objective number, the trainee may use the listed

standards or reference materials during the interview. When using listed standards or

reference materials, the trainee should be able to quickly choose the applicable document

and reference the required information.

ENTERGY NUCLEAR ENGINEERING FTK-ESPP-G00019QUALIFICATION CARD R EV 2 IMPLEMENTING THE FLOW ACCELERATED CORROSION (FAC) PROGRAM Page 3 of 6 Prerequisites:

None Standard: The trainee, while referencing a copy of the reference(s) listed below, should demonstrate the ability to perform, simulate, or discuss the applicable knowledge and/or performance

requirement.

References:

EN-DC-126, CALCULATIONS

ENN-CS-S-008, Pipe Wall Thinning Structural Evaluation

EN-DC-315, Flow Accelerated Corrosion Program.

EN-DC-174, Engineering Programs Section EN-MS-S-015-Multi, Conduct of Programs and Component Engineering EN-EP-S-005, Flow Accelerated Corrosion Scanning and Gridding Standard.

EN-OE-100, Operating Experience.

PS-S-001 Localized Pipe Wall Thinning and Crack-Like Flaw Evaluation Standard

NRC Bulletin 87-01 Thinning of Pipe in Nuclear Power Plants.

NRC Generic Letter 89-08, Erosion/Corrosion Induced Pipe Wall Thinning.

NSAC 202L, EPRI Report, Recommendations for an Effective Flow Accelerated Corrosion

Program.

EPRI TR-106611- Latest rev., Flow Accelerated Corrosion in Power plants.

ANO

References:

ANO-M-2555

ANO-M-555

Standard Work Practices:

All tasks are performed following the site standard work practices of Communications, Procedure Adherence, Self-Checking Principles, Security Practices, and use of Operating

Experience.

ENTERGY NUCLEAR ENGINEERING FTK-ESPP-G00019QUALIFICATION CARD R EV 2 IMPLEMENTING THE FLOW ACCELERATED CORROSION (FAC) PROGRAM Page 4 of 6 Tools and Equipment:

In accordance with references Knowledge Requirements:

1. Review applicable references, including how to access them and where to go for more information.

______________/_____

Mentor/Evaluator Date 2. Discuss the relevant portions of ANSI-B31.1, Power

Piping Code.

______________/_____ Mentor/Evaluator Date

3. Discuss the FAC program requirements, the NRC FAC requirements and the Site FAC program

implementation.

______________/_____ Mentor/Evaluator Date

4. Discuss the inspection methods relating to FAC and how to evaluate and disposition the inspection data for

each method.

______________/_____ Mentor/Evaluator Date

5. Discuss the sources of FAC related OE, screening for applicability and importance of industry Events to FAC

implementation.

______________/_____ Mentor/Evaluator Date

ENTERGY NUCLEAR ENGINEERING FTK-ESPP-G00019QUALIFICATION CARD R EV 2 IMPLEMENTING THE FLOW ACCELERATED CORROSION (FAC) PROGRAM Page 5 of 6 Performance Requirements:

NOTE: Circle the performance level used during mentoring if not specified. (P) Perform, (S) Simulate, or (D) Discuss

. 1. Evaluate inspection results and perform a wall thinning Evaluation in accordance

with applicable procedures.

P, S ________________/_____

Mentor/Evaluator Date

2. Develop an inspection plan from CHECWORKS/SFA plants and industry

operating experience and events, and

wall thinning calculations P, S ________________/_____

Mentor/Evaluator Date

3. Prepare a CHECWORKS model P, S ________________/_____

Mentor/Evaluator Date

4. Demonstrate the knowledge necessary to review a proposed plant modification or

test for impact on the FAC Program.

P, S ________________/_____

Mentor/Evaluator Date

ENTERGY NUCLEAR ENGINEERING FTK-ESPP-G00019QUALIFICATION CARD R EV 2 IMPLEMENTING THE FLOW ACCELERATED CORROSION (FAC) PROGRAM Page 6 of 6

TRAINEES NAME: _____________________

TRAINEE FEEDBACK:

1. What items would you include in this position-specific qualification card that were not included?

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

2. What items are included in this qualification card that you feel are unnecessary?

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

3. Overall, how useful is this qualification card in helping you prepare to assume the duties of your position? Rate on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = no use, 10 = extremely useful).

Rating: ____________ Comments: ___________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

__________________ _________

Trainee Date EVALUATORS FEEDBACK:

1. What items would you include in this position-specific qualification card that were not included?

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

2. What items are included in this qualification card that you feel are unnecessary?

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

3. Overall, how useful is this qualification card in helping the trainee prepare to assume the duties of his or her position? Rate on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = no use, 10 = extremely useful).

Rating: ____________ Comments: ___________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

__________________ _________

Evaluator Date