ML13169A266: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[L-13-164, Addendum to Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report]]
| number = ML13169A266
| issue date = 06/18/2013
| title = Perry - Addendum to Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report
| author name = Kaminskas V A
| author affiliation = FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000440
| license number = NPF-058
| contact person =
| case reference number = L-13-164
| document type = Letter, Report, Miscellaneous
| page count = 72
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:FENOC-Fi rstErngy Nuclear @nting @mpanyPerry Nuclear Power Plant tO Canter RndPerry, Ohio 44081 Vtlo A, Kanlrckag Vice President 44o.28/l-l5382 Fa,x:44&28O80N June 18, 2013 L-1 3-164 ATTN: Document Gontrol DeskU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Rockvllle, MD 20852 10 cFR 50.54(0
 
==SUBJECT:==
Perry Nuclear Power Plant Docket Nfs. $Q-440, License No.
NPF-58Addendum to Perry Nuclegr.
Power Plant Near-Tprm Task Forcp Recomme-ndation
 
===2.9 Seismic===
Walkdown Rqpqrt On March 12,2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a letter titled,"Request for Information Pursuant to Titfe 10 of the Code of Federal Regulaffons50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1,2.3, and 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force'Review of Insights frorn the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident,o to all power reactor licenseesand holders of construction permits in ac'tive or defened status. Enclosure 3 of the10 CFR 50.54(0 letter contains specific Requested Actions, Requested Information, andRequired Responses associated with Recommendation 2.3 for Seismic Walkdowns.
By fetter dated November 27,2012 (ADAMS Package Accession No. ML130080030),FENOC submitted the 180-day response to the 10 CFR 50.54(0 letter. The required seismic walkdown reports were provlded for Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1;Beaver Valley Powei Station, Unit No. 2; Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station; and Perry Nuclear Power Plant. Followlng incorporation into ADAMS, thg document pages were observed to not be in the same order as the November 27,2012 submittal, and FENOC resubmitted the enclosures in elec'tronic format by letter dated April 29, 2013.During the seismic walkdowns, certaih plant areas were inaccessible due to conditionsexpected during normal power operatlon.
FENOC commifted to submit a supplementalreport documenting the results of the additional seismic wafkdowns performed during a specified refueling outage. As committed for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, the additional seismiC wakdowns were completed during the spring 2013 refueling outage.FENOC hereby submits the enclosed addendum to the Perry Nuclear Power PlantNear-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report.
Perry Nuclear Power Plant L-l3-164 Page 2 There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter. lf there are any questions or lf additional informatlon is required, please contact Mr. Thomas A.
Lentz, Manag*lr -Fleet Licensing, at 330-315-6810.
I declarg-qnder penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on June /y,zo1il.WnMVito A. Kaminskas
 
==Enclosure:==
 
Addendum to Perry Nuclear Power Plant Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) (w/o Enclosure)NRC Region lll Administrator (w/o Enclosure)NRC Resident Inspector (PNPP) (w/o Enclosure)NRR Project Manager (PNPP) (w/o Enclosure)
Addendum toPerry Nuclear Power Plant Near-Term Task Force Recommendation
 
===2.3 Seismic===
Walkdown ReportApril 5, I0{ $Jtrlry-Fr*trf irt ffcrre$'ed*y:
4-^i(-+=iampeffi Apprcvvd by: FlrstEnergy Nuclear Opersting Gornpany {FEHOC}
Purpose: In response to the NRC Letter 50.54(0 Section 2.3, First Energy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) submitted its response to the NRC in November 2012 for its PerryNuclear Power Plant. Page 124 of the submittal report Table 6-3 identified 10components that were not accessible during the time walkdowns were performed while the plant was in operation.
A commitment was added in the report stating that these 10items will be walked down during the next refueling outage.The purpose of this addendum to the report is to document the findings of those 10components that were walked down during March/ApiI2013 refueling outage.
Attachments:1. Revised pages 61 and 66 of Table 4-L to correctly identify the building, elevationand room number for Components 1H22P0011 and 1H51P1335.
: 2. Revised pages 106 and 107 of Table 4-2 to correctly identify the building,elevation and room number Components 1H22P001 1 and 1H5 lP 1 335 .3. Revised page 114 of Table 4-3 to correctly identify the building for Component 0G41F0581.
: 4. Revised page 124 for Tables 6-2 and 6-3 to include the additional rooms walked down (DW-630, DW-599 and FH-574) and to document that the walk down ofinaccessible areas were completed during March/Apnl2013 refueling outage.5. Revised page 124 for Table 6-2 to correct the building and elevation of room CC-1.6. Seismic Walkdown Checklists for 10 components that were identified asinaccessible in the original submittal report.7 . Area Walk-By Checklists associated with the 10 components stated in Item 6 above.8. Revised Area Walk-By Checklist (pages 93-99 of 139) to correct the building andelevation of room CC-l as mentioned in item 5 above.
Findings: No potentially adverse findings were identified for these components and in theassociated rooms. The findings are documented in the attached Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWC) and the associated Area Walk-By Checklists (AWC).
t\)tJ@tJ t.J-l NJ NJ Ltl tJ t9 NJ t\)\o N)tJ o\tJ N)UI tJ i.J 5 o tJ t.J 5 t)t-)5 t.)t9 (,@
@I\)FI t-/tr'E'vg ID t-l>iq AF Xy 2 V)rl>o xtl z a rl z-l F=04 B22E'{F:l3t4 a\l v=FE\^t I z!-la-U> ::i n*rr/ FU 2 o a>F Xi z (t)*l X<trk z Ct')-'U X<--R.(t)a R:--R.w 0 x<--R.F q)(t)( z^53H^fr2 z-l?Y lr<Ex ,1*F'G ut a Ft E c X Xoo o o o o o o X o o T CE (Jl Or oo Ltl o\@Or tJ Or 5 tJ o\l'.J o\l.J t9 NJ Or N)N)(.,l{5 Or (,rl 5 tt f!<a s al{o\F' A XL^Lrl 9H H*9s o-Y t-er Ejo Y t-rr Eio F('F('UJ f.1 (.rl xs LAJ o@w:.F o E:th ANJ('N o x o 5:d J1 @F*$-g s I O (t) =q:>E txo 9i3 tx(D 943 cn=qJ cn=(t) :Fti Laj v)Jf"l Lrl Q=oJ v)=
U)JFI LTJ Q=O: P*>ri 3XO 9f3 v1 ou)gv)rlA(l \r (D (D (t)o ooo ooo o o o o A s o OQ.T-$HI rl o H z zzz z z z z z z z z FI U)E ID (l tl.*Frr EEI o 55zo E5-1 30 A a?Fy9p 3 gE zu O xE f)5 #g u,-N U)-6'o>=^)HO
-o:, (t)(A!^)(t)a!D 0 a!^)a (t)E5x!]!J;^Ya v)a o CD: lm Et9 sd or<ts (a4 E*E T,)E }i 8tr6(n q. Fi (D 5-rt-I g-* F i" il.t4l oa o ()Ft oFE f H Z=c'-rr=gH FF)a-c H=y1ilF FnE B3 gia,F o nFv, \'=-r=gH TF c.r)d (A )^- A H5 YH f F:iaE-3f H 7F*aE H3f H FF FAgFE f X Z^@-O all i;.LJ=giaF (D aFu, L,E-i =FH TF*ai H-PH 5X HAvtY o aI a-xE=(D-r5 OH E. Fg.E- F ttc H Et..)kd li gE EI. E,gT (D w g LTJ E o 0-F F E o V)(<(A!l..!I$-$ue IE E z z o a o 0 U)o o o a o a (D v)z a z z gE w fl E (D H 5 tt I 19 ll tD t t H FI F o T T (D.+(a r-t z r-t-3 tt F}rl (D I-f't o Fi o I I!t o (t (A (h cn (D 0 CD a CD (h CD (t a o v)o vt CD U>E th (3.*F sF EE-i E'15 I 25'g s?gsg RF E{rgg,tt F EEr.r r?+!i. , X' t-{8E E$H.H H3 Fd E!o\
Lfi (, 5 (JI (, (, (JI (, (,@lJl w (, Or (rl (, (, lJl Ltl@Lh@@Lrr@{LN{
@Llr{
UJ Lfi (,{(,tl (, FI FT'E'vE (F ,.F i 5 5's l'lw o lo ll-lo Itr t=l(D I ttt l.o Itr rct (z^xqx x';oZ z-l FVt>U o<7!r o-z a d FV)>U o<Fr ol-z v)i FVt>C'o<Xr o-z 0-l FV)>U o<Fr o-z (n-l=F'Y>;=A 2^!io O\ /w f,L z3\(wo&L z3:5->d z t-z-z-z-I vl (!u (?Il aD E X{*o o o o X{w g oe (JI oo (.fl{5 o\N)o\i'J tJ tJ o\t'.)o\N.)ttJ rJl{s (rl{5 Ltl oo o\(,tl oo o\EI (D p t!.*F[9;= rJr gu 65 UP t!*F'l \O d Lf'o t9 t9 A o t9 F o H dt 5N('/)d- o'^jraa 5x ra F*$-g^r*>ri@=o:)w=V): 'Fl a: (t) =Q: a=0J P*>ri^t*>ri^)*>x^)*>!i i)*>x^r*
>ri (a ou)ro qA 6 \r (!o ooooo o o o o o o o 19 Fl.t!0q o d-E$1 z z z z z z z z z z z z E e!(D fl ai.*Fpr ftEfl o>=^r HO BO-o{o r-t I (/){R" o o I a I R" o o I U)R" o I (/)R" o o{EI{Q E*Ur al cc<4 E*
EgEE F.H3gts'< Ftr lhil YH f F (D aI i; '^.r =H5 rtsFe =t)g=;P lt-c: '-t5 FH FF Fa=H5 Oi+FE FD = t\)g=;P ll-c H5FH f F ll-d i=o+glaF o a!tLr=ts=giaF*nE H=FE 5X Z=@Y o all i;LJE H5 geaFa'^ =H5f H TF o a!a-x=H3f H TF o all a.!.,=E3f H TF*a=io B1 nFr!L rt l!F EHii h)i{ ld sfa I.F[E?v)l-o a a (t)a U)a (D ts I$-$ts z o (h a o v)tu z z z z z z z g*v)a Fl (D (D 5 (?I s FI (D Ht F'T H (?FF Eh r-t z Ft-Fl o K e!Fl.tr B{{T E o E o Fl tD I?a (D cl)o o o (t ch (D C'a ta o v)o (a 0 (n FI u (D.\g F sF EF-BE 15 t z5'g E?Esg gE rgg_a Fq iE+[='-8E FT F,H (D g3 fC rrt o\o\
Lrt{Lll Lh oo{UI (,{tJ NJ (,{5 (, z Or s (, z F 5 (rl (/l z (.'l Ltr lrl (,tl o\w lJl Fll s Ul EI*E tr'E'vl t!.F$l II;l$l fil l*l tElt5 lt5 ll(+ ltlIH It< llo Ilv) llo' Il.? I IE Itr l!J lo lo Ii'l (t)R E! U 5 <5 Z'sRF*\ roQ "o QoE v^*H V J J '-Y.V.i ='-oa ZA:trl id -DsD XF<E ('u tr z r Ft r-. Fl l+l-*A\rlH Si R9P5 !l' Oo -'^v!,lAVH EH 6H 2U=O-u?E2zEE l{;rr=3 (4NWV.=9 g z-l I'ETT' AJ 2=qz!r>-l z.l t',d rrl7. ln;-: tq 3 E-l tl l'z6 u)-I{742=21'a<EE 'O t-a (AF zv1 aa t-A<<=LQUi se-_i a EE s5{D gr)a Fl F}g x X o o X o o o X X X X 6 3 oo (Jtl\o\o o\l.J (JI\o\o o\A NJ o\(Jl 5 9l{5 Ltl\t 5 o\t9 9l{s o\NJ Or Lfi
{5 Lq (!F}{(, (j)UH BUi (, o-ttJ Ltl Or o (rl fr o o E l*55+(D o F9" o tJ X F- >IF ,.\ \Y-*-(, 5A-?)C)Fe.o t.* a+ . \ \, vwH (a 55FU)otD"o;"- a gJrg ct)SAFV)
ODD'O t"- a vwF a 55-U)oF0'o t"-d cr (,:i (t 55-?)o Fe" o t.- nF r \ \, vwE a 55-?)oFD'O t-- a vwX (, 55871 o tD- O;t.- a'i.6Pg (t)55-?)o tD' o t.- a vwts ta 55tsCn C)FD'O ot"- a',vwH cl)5S$(/1 o sD- o19 :-1S 5- X',vwF (A9g E E3$UE-FD o o-FD (D (h xFD (t-FD a xFo Ch F o-F!F o F!u)aa EA FIA G rl (!oooooo o o o o o o al tD 0n c dOr vlE r,)6-$E: I z z z z z z z z FI (A!t (!t)(+.*F.m a" Ea(DA EE.fr$s r'I o-o{o I o ord>9R'36:.<=!,J (t)?l (t)o o o o o!^)0 V)F3?p 3 9F zo O r-iX f1; #g ia t: o) (,-5'F3?e 3 gH F O xE 66 6'9 ?)'=At @EEI{a E!e st-. F+oc<$*gr gaaF r!t ts3 gH F5*od=(D i=gH.AF a'x=ts1 gLa,Fa :'=F.r C Oi+gna.F o a!a.!=-=O+gae.F=6d f5 Y;@)-.F=66 f5<o90 FDrJ P#Hs?E;.eo VH F=65 7f5-<* r to;RZ); =. Fr-'ido?sEr dg3-- i'D o T Ar Htf f;E 9p<F gEg +lrJ a-ct)o ooo V)u fl.
(D I#-$ta z z z (uzz z z z o z EE a f}ll (D o 5 (l I I'Fl o Flr i{t ttl{F!o ll (D al.U'z r-1 z z z z r-t 3 Q tlr rt tB x o d-o{{!-Fl ID I 4{!ll s F}F!fD Ch (t o (t o (h o (t o a q (n tn (D C'o (h FI ra&(D.*E'6 (.)E.$'U?;Fi.e Hti-E 9R o**E=E aH s e'IuE A 5m F-9 gH*Fl!l c{(,rl irJ 5 (,tl t9\5 oo o\(, i.\N)m AF H*3 fr*E*E H-$.H+ti oo Ltr I t, t,\t I Ur I IQ E3 Et.l o\
5 NJ 5 tJ 5 l, t'J tJ 5 (, 3 (, 5 (, o tQ 5 (, o (, o\(,\o (, (, o\tQ Lfr tg 5 tr.J ul (, (, Ltl t!tr'E'vH tD E al x/1 C)x g{IqH E6--l[1]sDn f \.1 1 V)oc (D U<a- \,t<Fl ,,2 ri:o'1rx\-l o r.l z-V)11>E=kE il;e z=?l z ot0 E<z z tlj-Zur\o I<OEE<>EF>iHts8 frnT{c ln>'0-"-F-:'n HEEHf z2 ,ux h5 XF-o ta f'Fl r5 c o o FI XXX o o T P oQ UI{5 o\Lfi o\N)o\tJ o\t\)o\
tJ (Jl{5 L'T-l 5 lJl{5 5 l.J t9 o\t'.J H\^J TD s IF F o A'rl O, t'J t.J l..J o t\)o oo o (, o 5 F, ('Xut o HE n r:tF SSHLa otD"()oi--n''/vwE (h 55-(, osD"o i;.- n*'g l, 5 (, 55*(, o 90" o itI" a'ngP g o 5S-?)C)tD"O t"- n vwt (n SSsU)o !D, O i;1" il'n9515 a 55+?)
otD'o ttj"a',vwE o 55-CD otD.O;i"-a',vwE a 55-(, OFD'O ot"*n'nct(rx a 55sU)ote"o it"-a-.-PH 0 55-C, olr"o;"-n vwH a S5)-(/1 C)tD-o rQx x O(,!{a SEP(, olilo"*.bJ A-r\(9 vw{a H*$-g o Fl (D Fl F a a-Fl o-o F'F CD-(D XT xFD (D v)U)V)l*U2 ovt Fvt FN (D o ooooo o o o o o o o 19 al(D oe o I'l-$HI z z z z z z z z z z z l-l H at, G (t Fl.a
.*FFT rEI (/1 5 I R" o o{(.')5 R.o o I o I I o 9 o I o I o;o o o i-o{o F!o2d>9R 36;.<=rll dvt ltS E6"H. a)oq<$*Bn rN :E N)Xi"f-9*-l FD !,.oa ,f OQu, !D ID :E 19 xn--' - F.l oe ,f t?0 agD<oJ 3$ #a*i iits 6'<Orr F$ #x5 6'I p ti ct\o a tDy o->(Dt-@py o.>O'1 E (,\o ru o Ft YH FF a.x=i(D H=gH TF o a!a.x=H5 FE 9N)t{ lr sfE I' ;f gT o o o a-0 c<TA o t T$-$+s z zzz z z z z tn z z o v)Etr a n 4 (D o It 5 tl I$9 rt t!al.nl trl F!o H T (D FF (a Fl z z z z z z z z z 7 E th l+ln (D o I-{E 5{H I-5{E{*Fl (D E tD Fl t9 a+l!(D G (, CD 0 (n o (t o a o Ch o U)a (D (u (n o o o o F t0*(t.rl 5.)6F FOox t.J i't go FErof- z I E.H g E=H*E e 5u)F-9H Hg ET'F a.} li'J{ttJ l, i.,lr UI (, tJ (, Ltr t, I'^J;^, o\(, t, (,\tJ (,tl N)lJt aF E*3 Hs*E*E H-1H+b\5 I 5 l.J io I o\'t-)(, I 5 (.fl bo
{I w Ur 5 Ltr O t,-o\l\)bo 5 tJ Lrt Ltr 9l I NJ E3 E 'l{r\)
tJ N)\o tJ w NJ FIl t, tr.J o tJ tJ o tr.J hJ t9 o t.)N)5{(, l.J s A o\5 L)(.fl oo 5 lJl o\HI TH UE (D t i o 5 I (, ED O o t-O t.)I 0 a a (a v)(D L)o<a7F.FHH PH>r!2=Z: t'19;i ijr<-t!v a>o OF;F<xY ctt-OF f;><x Ya-F F X!E AF>F;=E x!d AF>H 7\L^J X:d AF>H v\X:d>H v\HHAI+l Ayi-{;1 YAF=F'^n\:i*Li''r E:FX Fcj<5 tn :U-? Tl 'l'r1 EsEE< X:j--vt lal \'lJ l-vi-i<F6 rnFrn 3 Z 'rJ'l ?1 E6EE<7{:i[n>F vJ--<#6 rllFTN fYc\ t(-;EE ri x'z aF4 cruq ix3 aaE FR" FI t!ort{?4-EI XXX XXX XXX-a o0 (.rl{5 (/l
{5 Lfi{5 (rl{5 (/l{A UI\o (.tl\o\o Lrl\o
\o Ltr\o\o Lll-l 5 Lfi\o LN\o L'I{5 (/l\o\o EI t?s F}o{o 5 o o\5{A{A{7(NJ{{\){t'fr{*LD (A FDO wR (r'c]F 5 l'.)v, qFF Fgs*$f-a 3'i, rr ?)-FU 7Q AE l- C/)3't- (t)-FU f4 u1 AE F?)-FU-v)AE-c,->u f4 (/)?4 r< ?l-FU f4(a C'3-v)?d-(, AE F (n gV2 FUt FIA (l \r tD o oooo ooo o o o o o o s F 0e c F!m (?F AtD['g (Du E', qrh. ut t?z z z z z z z z z z z z z z FI a E (D tt fl c.{7n*ftEI^@;>*F<T CD (n-1 00 d>=z FF<T o (t^@'y>:tz=. t-r ido<T o FU O\E<Eg o F9 FU Ul FAO Nl''r'1 N)(D:-fTl !)x=-*cn oea afll l.J o:-B .,;x=-g.a oe Q-r_.1 o+! tJ oi-ITI F' XA 8-a oc o.F: a FtJ o-lTlCl)x=-9.6 oao o E (u<oo Fflo>3 5(D ser<oO^<i5a>+J5 Fi<oo^<i5a\=Hd<oo
^< i5 ,r>+=o s)r r'98 FSo>+ilq FE 9nr qCH 19 s e.fftaJ< lR FEF{B IA c/)(t)L)(n o rt)(t)a?l CA a (h a E]U)V)V)VI Ut o tr$E EA?(D C'o cn o 0 o (h o ch o o (h (u@(D a o ra o v)@o (t gE a l,)F tD tr)ft I tr F!(D flr Fll: t!{x I (D (n z zzzz z z z z r-1 Ft r-t E I E o TA cl li n (!I{-{-{-{E-{I*{E H{Fi (D (!l!p 4 o o (D o (n o ta CD (t v)o O o v)o CN 0 a CD o (t o v)(t-UI TD.9 EgE E FHgH f no'o a 99r/,$E E*F5 E* I: 5 Table 6-2: Perry NTTF 2.3 Walk-By Areas Room Blde Floor El CC-I CC 574 co-620 CO 620 co-642 CO 642 EW-l EW 586 FH-2a IB 599 FH-3a FH 620IB- 1a IB 574 IB.2 IB 599 rB-2 (2)IB 599 IB-3a IB 620 IB-4 IB 665 DW-630 DW 630 DW-599 DW 599 FH-574 FH 514Table 6-3:
Perrv NTTF 2.3Inaccessible Items on SWEL I+2 *Equip. ID Description Bldg EI Column/Row or Deg 1821A0003A Accumulator For F004lA DW 630 58 DEG 1821F0022AIB MSIV B21.FOO22A DW 6301 DEG 1821F0041AADS Valve DW 630 55 DEG 1821F0410A SV For F041A DW 630 55 DEG 1821F04108SV For F041A DW 630 55 DEG 1833C0001ARX Recirculation Pump A DW 599145 DEG 1E51F00631E51-F0063 Motor Valve DW 626 O DEG lH22P00trStandby Liquid Control Instrument Rack CO 642265 DEG 1H51P1335SDV Local Instrument Rack CO 620 95 DEG 0G41F0581 Fuel Pool Cask Pit Drain Isolation Valve FH 514 Hl07* These items were walked down during the March/April 2013 outage r24 Paul C. Riezo Associatcs, Inc.ENCINTEfi S E C'ONSL:LTAlfTi Status:@Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lH5lPl335 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) RacksEquipment DescriptionSDV LOCAL INST RACK Location:
Bldg. CO Floor El. 620Manufacturer, Model, Etc.
Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?No tag identifiedfor instrument. Mounting configuration consists of 2 plates, eachanchored via 4-1.25" diameter anchors to drvwell wall.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/oforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
N Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N Y X X X X X X fe Paul c' Risao Assor:iatcs, Inc.INCINEERS s. T'ON5L]LTAIfTS Sheet 2 of35 Status:@U N Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1H5lPl335 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description SDV LOCAL TNST RACK Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines were identifiedwith adequate flexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
N Y N Y U N Y U N Y U N/A U N/A N/A X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
U N Y Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) mlM#;Evaluated bv:Eddie M.
GuerraBrian A. Lucarelli Date: Date: 41212013 4/2t2013 X Sheet 3 of 35 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E NG lNEE RS 6. CnNsu-ETAhTS Status:@U N Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lH51Pl335 Equip.
Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description SDV LOCAL INST RACK File Name: l-68-l29Spg
 
==
Description:==
General view of componentFile Name: l-70-129.1p9
 
==
Description:==
 
View of component's surrounding areaOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
Sheet 4 of35 Paul C, Riezo Associarcs, Inc.Er"C ! N f E fi S & Ct')NSl.I LTAIf Ti Status:@Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lH22P00ll Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) RacksEquipment Description STANDBY LIQUID CONTROL INSTRUMENT RACK Location:
Bldg.COFloor El.
642 Manufacturer.
Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage1.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Rack anchorage configuration consists of I4-I/2" diameter anchors around the perimeter of the rack. (There are 4 infront, 4 in back, 3 on left, 3 on right)2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Mild surface rust observed on rack anchors. Judged not to present any significantstructural impact.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
N Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N/A N/A N Y X X X X X X pcle Paul C. Risz' Associatcs, Inc.t i-C ! NEf lt9 &. CI}NSI.:I-TA!f TS Sheet Status:Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.
1H22P0011 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) RacksEquipment Description STANDBY LIQUID CONTROL INSTRUMENT RACKInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Scaffolding adjacent to instrument rack is well braced andjudged not to be aninteraction concern.
A small unrestrained bucket adjacent to the rackjudged not to present any structural impact thus not a concern.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attac hed lines w ere identified w ith adeq uate fl exibil ity.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y X Y X Y X Y X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated bv:Eddie M. Guerra w Brian A. Lucarelli Date: Date: 41212013 4/212013 Y X Sheet 6 of35 Paul C. Riezo Associatcsr Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lH22P00l I Equip. Class 18.
Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description STANDBY LIQUID CONTROL INSTRUMENT RACK File Name: l-67-la3 jpg
 
== Description:==
 
Component Plate ID File Name: l-68-l431pg
 
==
Description:==
General view of component Status:@U NOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
Sheet 7 of 35 Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lH22P00l I Equip.Class 18. Instrument (on) RacksEquipment Description STANDBY LIQUID CONTROL INSTRUMENT RACK File Name: l-69-la3 jpg
 
== Description:==
 
View of component anchorage configuration File Name: l-70-la3 jpg
 
== Description:==
 
View of scaffolding next to instrument rack Status:@U N Paul C. Risza Associatcs, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lH22P00l I Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment DescriptionSTANDBY LIQUTD CONTROL INSTRUMENT RACK File Name: l-71-l43jpg
 
==
Description:==
 
View of flexible affached lines Sheet 8 of35 Status:@U N Sheet 9 of35Paul C. Rizzo A*sociatcs.
Inc.ENCtNEtItS & {t}l\51.:Ir^tfrl
@Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E51F0063 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesEquipment Description Location:
Bldg. DWIE5I-FOO63 MOTOR VALVEFloor El.
626 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?MOV is mounted on insulated piping (-18" diameter). Pipingwas identified to beadequately supported.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%oforwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
N/A X X X X X X Sheet l0 of35 Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc.E l*clNEE lt$ &. (alNSU LrA$Ti Status:@N Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E51F0063 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesEquipment Description IE5I.FOO63 MOTOR VALVEInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?Nearby scaffolding identified judged not to be a concern.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines w ere identified w ith adequate fl exibil ity.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
N Y N Y N Y U N Y U N/A N/A N/A X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
,4 Evaluated by:Eddie M. GuerraBrian A. Lucarelli U N Y Date: Date: 4t2/2013 4t2t2013 X Sheet I I of35 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E51F0063 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesEquipment DescriptionIE51.FOO63 MOTOR VALVE File Name: l-67-497 .Spe
 
== Description:==
 
Component Plate ID File Name: l-68-497 .Spe
 
== Description:==
General view of component Status:@U NOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
Sheet 12 of 35 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1E51F0063 Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated ValvesEquipment DescriptionIE5I.FOO63 MOTOR VALVE File Name: l-69-497 .Spe
 
== Description:==
 
View of insulated piping attached to MOV.Status: @N U PCe Paul C. Rieao Associatcs, I*c.EN(;INf ER5 & {'ONsUL'I'A$Ts Sheet 13 of35@Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lB2lF0022A Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated ValvesEquipment Description Location:
Bldg. DWFloor El.630IB MSIV Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?This is a large Spring-operatedvalve
(-l}ftfrom pipe center line) mounted on aninsulated large pipe. Pipe was identified to be well supported.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Vo for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
X X X X X X of35Patrl C, Rieao Associatcs, Inc.ETiGINFE*s & CONSUI.TA$IS Status: Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lB2lF0022A Equip. Class
: 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment DescriptionIB MSIV Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Spring actuator sectionwas noted to be close to grating (-3" clearance) and potential interaction may occur. This potential interaction was judged not to have a significant effect on the valve due to its overall robust configuration.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
Attac hed lines w ere identified w ith adequate flexibility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y X Y X Y X Y X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)(w Brian A. Lucarelli Date: Date: 4/2t2013 4t2t2013 Y X_rut&ld, Evaluated by:Eddie M.
Guerra Paul C. Ri?.zo Associatcs, Inc-Sheet l5 of 35[];CIN[ERS &, f"r]NSI_;
I.TAITTS Status:@U N Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.
lB2lF0022A Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated ValvesEquipment DescriptionIB MSIV File Name: l-67-499jpg
 
==
Description:==
 
General view of component File Name: l-68-499jpg
 
==
Description:==
 
View of flexible attached lines Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
Sheet l6 of 35 Paul C. Riezo Associatcs, Inc.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lB2lF0022A Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment DescriptionIB MSIV
@File Name: l-69-499jpg
 
==
Description:==
 
Clearance between valve spring actuators and grating steel framing.
pce Paul C. Riez. Ass'ciatcs, I'c.E!i(ilNEElts &
{t)N9ULIA!{T5 Status:@Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.
lB2lF004lA Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment DescriptionADS VALVELocation: Bldg.
DW Floor El.630 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage l.Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Valve I 82 I F004 I A is part of a group of 4 sequential relief valves mounted on an insulated pipe. Pipingwas identified to be well supported and no signs of degradedc onditions w ere identified.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
N Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N Y X X X X X X Paul C. Riezo Associatcs, fnc,E N*(;l NEERS & i'ONSU LTASTS Status:@Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lB21F004lA Equip. Class7. Pneumatic-Operated ValvesEquipment DescriptionADS VALVEInteraction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attac he d lines w ere identified w ith adequate fl exibil ity.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N Y N Y N Y N Y X X X XOther Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
N Y Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) wBrian A. Lucarelli Date: Date: 4t2/2013 41212013 XEvaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Sheet l9 of 35 Paul C. Rizzo Associatc$r Inc.Eli(; I NEERS d. C0NSIj LTA,YTS Status:@Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lB2lF004lA Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated ValvesEquipment Description ADS VALVEOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-67-500jpg
 
==
Description:==
 
General view of component FQ Paul c' Rizz. Arsociatcs, Inc,E!i(;INEf RS &
C'OI\ISULTA}ITs Sheet 20 of35 Status:@Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.
lB2lF04l0A Equip. Class 88.
Solenoid ValvesEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.
DW SV FOR FO4IAFloor El.
630Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided atthe end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verificationof the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring suchSmall solenoid valve mounted on relief valve required (i.e., is the item one verification)?I 82I F0041A.
N Y N Y N Y N Y N Y2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
N Y X X X X X X Sheet Patrl C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc,[i.cINEEft S & ('{}NSTJ LTA!f TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.
1B21F0410A Equip. Class Equipment Description SV FOR F04lA 88. Solenoid Valves Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Att ac he d I ine s w er e identifi e d w ith adeq uate fl ex i b il ity.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X 2l of35 N/A N/A 4t2/2013 41212013 X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Lucarelli X-mtlffi"#rEvaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra Paul C. Rizeo Associatcs, Inc.Sheet 22 of 35 E!{GINEERS E I"ONSTJLTA\"TS Status:@U N Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lB2lF04l0A Equip. Class 88. Solenoid Valves Equipment Description SV FOR FO4IA File Name: l-67-505 jpg
 
== Description:==
 
General view of component Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
rc? Paul c' Rirzo Associatcs, Inc.E\-( ;l NEf.RS {x CONSl.rI.lA\-f S Sheet 23 of35 Status:@Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lB2lF04l0B Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid ValvesEquipment Description SV FOR FO4IALocation: Bldg.
DW Floor El. 630 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50Vo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
This solenoid valve is the same as I 82 I F0410A. Although it was not possible to viewthe valve from a close distance, plant personnel indicated that it corresponds to thevalve next to I 82 I F04I0A mounted on relief valve I 82 I F004 1A.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/ofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
N Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N/A N/A N Y X X X X X X PC? Paul C. Riezo Associatcs, Inc.tNctNf ER-l d.
coNsuLTAt*Ts Sheet 24 of35 Status:@U N Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1B2lF04l0B Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid ValvesEquipment Description SV FOR FO4IA Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attac hed I ines w ere identified w ith adequate fl exib ility.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N Y N Y N Y U N Y U N/A U N/A U N/A X X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
U N Y Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated bv:Eddie M. GuerraBrian A. Lucarelli Date: Date: 4t2/2013 4t2t20t3 X Sheet 25 of35 Paul C. Rirzo Associatcs, Inc.[:T(;I NET. RS {i CT}NSU LTAIfTi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IB2lF04l0B Equip. Class 88. Solenoid Valves Equipment Description SV FOR FO4IA File Name: l-67-505 jpg
 
== Description:==
General view of component Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
Paul C. Rieao Associatcs, fnc.Sheet 26 of35IN(;lNEtRS & C(}NSUt lAlfts
@Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lB2lA0003A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment DescriptionLocation: Bldg.
DWACCUM FOR FOO4IA Floor El. 630Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?Close access to accumulator was not possible during the walkdowns, However, a general view of the accumulators assembly demonstrated a rigid mountingconfiguration to the outside drywell wall.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y Y Y Y Y Y X X X X X X pc\? Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENC lNEER-q &
('t)N$t,l LTAl\'T$Status:@Sheet 27 NSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1B21A0003A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat ExchangersEquipment Description ACCUM FOR FOO41A Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
No potential interaction concerns identified in the vicinity of accumulator I 82IAOOO3A.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?U N Y U N Y U N Y U N Y X X X XOther Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for andadversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?
U N Y Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra&*W'Brian A. Lucarelli Date: Date: 412/2013 412/20r3 X Paul C. Riszo Associates, fnc.Seismic lValkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo. lB2lA0003A Equip.Class 2l.TanksandHeatExchangers Equipment DescriptionACCUM FOR FOO4IA Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-68-507 .Spe
 
== Description:==
General view of component File Name: l-69-507 jp1
 
== Description:==
 
View of component's surrounding area Sheet 28 of 35 pc\e Paul c. Rizeo Associatcs, Inc, El..(; I NEERS & (a)NSL LTAlfrS Sheet 29 of35 NU Status:@Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.
lB33C000lA Equip. Class 6. Vertical PumpsEquipment DescriptionRX RECIRC PUMP A Location:
Bldg. DWFloor El.599Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?1833C00014 correspondto the Reactor Recirculation Pump. This pump extends around 30ftfrom elevation 599'to top of motor housing.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/ofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
N Y N Y N Y N Y U N Y U N/A U N/A U N/A N/A U N Y X X X X X x PC\e Paul C. Rizao Associatcs, Inc.
Eta{;lNEEtts {* L'oNsLrLTAtfIJi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1B33C0001A Equipment DescriptionRX RECIRC PUMP ASheet 30 of35 Status:@U NEquip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Interaction Effects7 . Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?U N Y N Y N Y N Y N/A U N/A U N/A X X X X Other Adverse Conditions11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safetyfound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?
U N Y Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: 4t212013 41212013 X Sheet 3 I Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc.ENG INEERS
*. (T}NSU LTAN'T$Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1833C0001A Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment DescriptionRX RECIRC PUMP A File Name: l-67-770jpg
 
==
Description:==
General view of pump motor File Name: l-68-770jpg
 
==
Description:==
Pump motor and nearby scaffoldOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
Sheet 32 of35 Paul C. Rireo Associatcs, Inc.E ft-C lN EE RS & CtfNSU LTAIfT$Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. lB33C000lA Equip. Class 6. Vertical PumpsEquipment Description RX RECIRC PUMP A File Name: l-70-770jpg
 
==
Description:==
 
View of bracing elements at boffom of pump PCe Paul C. Ricz' Associatcs, Inc.I flclNEtRs si coNsuLTAfiTs Status:@Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0G4lF058l Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description FUEL POOL CASK PIT DRAIN ISOL VALVE Location:
Bldg. FH Floor El. 574 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoragel. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
This is a manual valve inJine with a 12" pipe located inside afloor opening at elevation 574'. Piping supports were visible through the grating andjudged to provide adequate support to the attachedvalves.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?No signs of excessive corrosionwere identified.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%
forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?Sheet 33 of35 N/A N/A X X X X X X PCt? Paul C. Riszo Arisociatcs, Inc.E \..(; I NEL Rl {r C\}NSt-l [-TA!\'Tl Sheet Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0G4lF058l Equip. Class 0.
OtherEquipment Description FUEL POOL CASK PIT DRAIN ISOL VALVEInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?No interaction concerns identified.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?X of35 N/A N/A 4t2t20r3 41212013 X X X Other Adverse ConditionsI l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra Brian A. Lucarelli X
PCe P;rtrl C. Ilie;* Ass'ci.tr:s, l'r'"Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0G4lF058l Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment DescriptionFUEL POOL CASK PIT DRAIN ISOL VALVE File Name : l-67 -7 69.Spe
 
== Description:==
 
General view of component File Name: l-68-769jpg
 
==
Description:==
 
View of grating above component.
Sheet 35 of 35 Status:@Other supporting or rqlevant documents and photos (if any):
pcte Paul c, Rizz. Associntcs, Inc.E i.-C'l Nf E RS 6. {'ONSU LTAIiTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area DW-630 Bldg.DWInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items.
Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?
Mild surface corrosion observed in several valves in the area. This is judged not aconcern since no material loss or excessive degraded condition was observed.
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 1E51F0063 1B2tFA022A 1B21F0041A lB2lF04l0A
 
l821F04t0B 182140003A
@Sheet I of20 N/A N/A Floor El.630 Y Y Y Y X X X X Paul C, Riezo Associatcs, lnc.Sheet EN(;lNEERt {. C'I'}NSI,:LTASIS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area DW-630 Floor El.630 Bldg.Status: DW Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
: 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?Scaffolding observed in the area qs part of the outage work. These were identifiedto be well braced and supported. No interaction concern identified.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date: 4/212013 4/2t2013 Y X Y X Y x Y X Brian A. Lucarelli Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inr:" Sheet 3 of20E :SCI NEE RS &. CONSU I-TAh"T5 Status:@Area \ilalk-By Checklist (AWC)Area DW-630 File Name: l-67 -500.JPG
 
== Description:==
 
General view showing relief valves File Name:
 
== Description:==
 
Floor El. 630 Bldg. Dw Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): r-67 -s00.JPG IMG O2I5.JPG General view of pipes connecting to steam line.
Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet 4 of20 ENCINEESS & CI}N5U TTANT$Status: DW UArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area DW-630 Floor El.630 Bldg.File Name: IMG 0224.WG
 
== Description:==
General view of accumulators mounted to outside drywell wall.
pct? Paul c. Riazo Associatcs, Inc.h"{;rNErft s &. rt)Nsu LTA}'T!Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area DW-599 Status: DWSheet 5 of20 N/A N/A N/A@Floor El.599 Bldg.Instructions for Completing ChecklistThis checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
lB33C000tA N Y N Y N Y N Y X X X X ry Paul c. Rizeo Associate.t, I'c.
EIJGINF EF*S &, CONSLTLT,{l\'TSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area DW-599 SheetFloor El.599 Bldg.of20 4t2t2013 4/212013 X Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Scaffolding observed in the area as part of the outage work. These were identifiedto be well braced and supported. No interaction concern identffied.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Observations talwnfrom elev 620'. RP advised to avoid area at elev. 599' due Evaluated by:Eddie M. Guerra Date: Date:to high radiation dose rates.X X X Brian A. Lucarelli Patrl C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc.ENGINEERS & Cf,}NSULTA!fT$
Status:@Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area DW-599Floor El.s99Bldg. DwOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-71-770qpg
 
==
Description:==
View of scaffolding in the area File Name: l-69-770jpg
 
==
Description:==
 
View of floor elevation 599 with recirculation pump lB33C000lA.
pcte Paul c" Rizro Associatcs, Inc.Ela('lNEf ltS & CONSULT/t:fTs Status:@Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area FH-574Floor El.574 Bldg.FHInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
0G41F0581 NSheet 8 of20 U N/AUN/A U N/A N Y N Y N Y U N Y N/A X X X X pcte Paul c. Riseo Associatc$, Inc.
EN(: I NFEILS {t CI}NSL:LTA!fI'SArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area FH-574 Status:@Sheet 9 N Floor El.574 Bldg.FH Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Piping in the areawas identified to be well supported and no potentialsource offlooding was noted.6. Does it appear that the area interactions that could cause is free of potentially adverse seismica fire in the area?U N Y U N Y U N Y 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated bv: Eddie M. Guerra U N Y Date: Date: 41212013 4t2/20r3 X X X X A. Lucarelli Sheet 10 of20 Paul C. Riseo Associates, Inc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area Status:@U N FH-574Floor El.
574 Bldg. EHOther supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: l-68-769jpg
 
==
Description:==
General view of grating above manual valve 0G41F0581.
pc\? Paul c. Rizz. ars'ciatcs, Inc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area co-620Floor El.620 Bldg.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.L Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?
: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?Corrosion on anchors identified in instrument racl<s base. As no material loss wasobserved, this was judged not to be a concernfor operability or seismic issues.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
HVAC ducts in the areawere identified to be rigidly supported.
: 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Small nut securingfloor gratingfound notfully tightened. Judged not to be significantas 8 otherfully tightened nuts are present at that interface.
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
l82lN0067C 1821N0073C
 
lH5lPl335@Sheet 11 of20 N/A X X X X Sheet Patrl C. Rizza Associatcs, Inc, IfaClNEtRS
{r ('tfN$l,rLf AlfftArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area co-620 Bldg.Status: CO@Floor El.620 Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No concerns identffied regardingflood sources.
: 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.9., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Scaffolding in area judged to be adequately supported.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Some small diameter piping observed that crosses over to drywell wall support. This pipingwasiudged tohave adequateflexibility to accommodate the very small seismic anchor movement loads expected at El.620.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by:Eddie M.
Guerra Date: 41212013 Date: 4/2t20r3 N Y N Y N Y N Y X X X X Brian A. Lucarelli Sheet 13 of20 Paul C. Ricuo Associatcrir Inc.EITC I NEER-S *, (A)NSU LTA}ffiiArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area co-620File Name: l-59-l-l-l3jpeg
 
==
Description:==
 
General viewFile Name: l-65-l-1-13 jpeg
 
== Description:==
 
Corrosion in instrument rack anchorageFloor El.620Bldg. CO Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
Paul C. Rissa A;sociatcr, Inc.
ENC I NEEITS &
C(}NSU LXfu\"TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area co-620Floor El.620 File Name: l-66-l-l-l3 jpeg
 
== Description:==
 
Loose nut for securing grating.File Name: l-71-1-l-13 jpeg
 
== Description:==
 
Mild corrosion identified in anchorage Sheet 14 of 20 Bldg.
PCe Paul C. Rizz* 4$r:ciates' rnc.Area Watk-By Checklist (AWC)Area co-642 Sheet Bldg.Status: CO@Floor El.642Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.l. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?Strut channel that anchors l/2" diameter pipe is corroded. No significant material loss identified. This is judged as OK sinceother supports for this tubing are adequate and the span lengths are short if the corroded strut is ignored.Slightly corroded anchors found on a wall support for a I/2" diameter pipe. Judged OK due to small demand loads.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Ductwork in the area identified to be rigidly supported.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Drip tray observed over pump and MOV in this area. Tray is attached to overhead pipe and judged OK.Related equipment on SWEL for this area:lcl lF01l0Alcl lFOl604.
lc4lc0001A 1C41F0001A
 
1c41F0029A lMl6F0020A lH22P00l I N Y N Y N Y N Y X X X X pCR Paul c. RiEz. Associatc$, I*c.E l..Cl NEEFS {. {:ONSL1 f TAif TtArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area CO-642 Status:@Floor El.642 Bldg.CO Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the areaTNo c oncerns identified regarding fl ood sources.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the arca?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary scaffold and ladders in area judged adequately restrained8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra N Y N Y N Y N Y Date: Date: 41212013 4/2120t3 X X
X X Brian A. Lucarelli pc.'te Paul C. Rizz* Associatcs, Inc.E rr*CIN EERS &. f.ONSLr tTA lfTt Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area co-642 SheetFloor El.
642Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):of 20 Status: Bldg. CO File Name: I-59-l-l- l2.1peg
 
== Description:==
 
General view File Name: l-60-l-l - l2Speg
 
== Description:==
 
Surface corrosion identified Paul C. Rizzo Associatcsr Inc.E ft-C I NE E R5 *, f'oNst,: LTA,\iTSArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area co-642Floor El.
642File Name: l-65-l-1- l2trpeg
 
== Description:==
 
Surface corrosion identifiedFile Name:
l-67 I - 12 trpeg
 
== Description:==
 
Surface corrosion identified Sheet I 8 of20 Status: Bldg.
Paul C. Rizzo.{*rsociate$, Inc.ENCINEERS
&. (ONzu LTAlfr$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CO-642 Floor El. 642 File Name: 1-68-l-l-l2Speg
 
== Description:==
 
Surface corrosion identified File Name: l-69-l l2Speg
 
== Description:==
 
General viewSheet 19 of20 Sheet 20 of 20 Paul C. Riszo Associates, Inc.
ENC lNEEtuq 6. (TINSU LTAIfT$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area CO-642 Floor El.642 File Name: l-70-l- l- l2Speg
 
==
Description:==
 
Ladders tied Paul C. Riczo A*sociatcs, Inc.E\cI Nf ER' & Ct'}NSULTAIiTS Status:@Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area CC-I Floor El.574 Bldg.CCInstructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarilyopening cabinets)?Two unanchored instrument air dryers identified near air receivers. A subsequent wallrdownwas performed and it was confirmed that there is no safety related equipment/component located in the near vicinity of this rack as well as no seismic II/I concern.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significantdegraded conditions?
: 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?HVAC ducts and raceways in the areawere identified to be rigidly supported.
Welded ECC piping observed to have adequate lateral and longitudinal supports.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 0H51P0039 0H5rPol93 0H5lP03l8 0P4780001A 0P47C0001A lP42B000lB
 
lP42C000lB 1P42F0665A
 
1P42F0665B N Y N Y N Y N Yof 139 X X X X PC? Paul C. Ricz* Associatcs, lnc, rsr;tNrtffi Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CC.I Sheet 94 of 139 Status:@Floor El.574 Bldg.CC X Interaction Effects5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the arca?Potential Flood Sources in the Area: Sewage Ejectors (0P66A5001A and 0P66A50018), Electrical Hot Water Heater (0P71A0003), and CC Chilled l(ater Storage Tanks (0P47A5006A, 0P47A50068, and 0P47A5006C).
Fire protection piping ranges from l " lo 4" diamter and is primarily rod hung, potential to interact with other overhead piping. Branch pipes are supported by rod hangers that utilizefriction clips. Fire protection piping is victaulic coupling type 77 (grooved connection) and judged OK. Configuration judged to be acceptable based on previous seismic evaluations shown in 36-series calculations. No concerns identified regardingflood sources.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?Potential Fire Sources in the Area: CCW Water Chiller Lubrication and P5l/P52 Air Compressor Oil. No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
: 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Cast iron pipes were identffiedwith tags reading Seismic Violation.
After walkdown proceedings, it was confirmed that thesetags relate back to a seismic walkdownfrom the past that identified issues and design engineering resolved issues. Nofurther action was required.
l " to 3" diameters piping to water heater P7l-4003 is rod hung. Judged OK as it is non-seismic and potentiat Jlooding wouldnot impact equipment.6 inch diameter cast iron sewage piping observed to be supported by long rod hangers Judged OK as the piping is non-seismic and potentialfloodingwould not impact category I equipment.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Date: 4t2/2013 Y U N Y Y Y X X X Brian A. Lucarelli Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 4/212013 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Area \ilalk-By Checklist (AWC)Area Status:@Sheet 95 of 139 U N File Name: 1-59-l- 1-01 jpeg
 
== Description:==
 
General view of room File Name: I l-l-01 jpeg
 
== Description:==
 
General view of room Floor El.574 Bldg.CC Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
Sheet 96 of 139 Paul C. Rizzo Associateff, Inc.
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area CC-lFloor El.
574 File Name: 1-65-l-l-01 jpeg
 
== Description:==
HVAC rigidly supported File Name: l-66-l - I -0 I jpeg
 
== Description:==
 
Victaulic fire protection piping Paul C, Rizzo Associate$, Inc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area@Sheet 97 of 139 U Bldg.Status: CC CC-l Floor El.574 File Name: l-67-l-l-01jpeg
 
== Description:==
 
Rod hung fire protection piping File Name: l-70-l-l-01 jpeg
 
== Description:==
General view of B area pc\te Patrl C. Rirs* Associarr:s, l*r:.
t:\('INL t'R5 t\ t {}}ist :;T.tsI iArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC)AreaSheet 98 of 139 Status:@Floor El.574 Bldg.File Name: l l - I -01 jpeg
 
== Description:==
Cast iron pipe File Name: l-74-l-l-01 jpeg
 
== Description:==
 
Air dryer rack (1P52-D003B) missing anchorage (similar issue IP52-D003A)
Paul C. Rigeo As$ociate$r lrrc.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Area CC-l Floor El.574 File Name: l-7 5-l - I -01 jpeg
 
== Description:==
 
Anchorage for air dryer racks (at top)Sheet 99 of 139}}

Latest revision as of 18:53, 11 April 2019

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13169A266&oldid=1441067"