ML17117A366: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[NL-17-0534, Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 27, Chapter 2, Figures 2B5B1-1 to 2B7-44]]
{{Adams
| number = ML17117A366
| issue date = 04/20/2017
| title = Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 27, Chapter 2, Figures 2B5B1-1 to 2B7-44
| author name =
| author affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000348, 05000364
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = NL-17-0534
| package number = ML17117A380
| document type = Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR)
| page count = 143
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REV 21  5/08
[STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-1 (SHEET 1 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-1 (SHEET 2 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-1 (SHEET 3 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-2 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-2 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[COMPACTED STATIC SOIL STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-3 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[COMPACTED STATIC SOIL STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-3 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-4 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-4 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-5 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-5 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STATIC ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-6 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STATIC ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-6 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC SOIL AND ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-7 (SHEET 1 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC SOIL AND ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-7 (SHEET 2 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC SOIL AND ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-7 (SHEET 3 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOIL C-1 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-8 (SHEET 1 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOIL C-1 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-8 (SHEET 2 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOIL C-1 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-8 (SHEET 3 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-1 AND C-2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-9 (SHEET 1 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-1 AND C-2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-9 (SHEET 2 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-1 AND C-2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-9 (SHEET 3 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-2 AND C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-2 AND C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT COMPACTED SOILS R-24, R-31 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10A (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT COMPACTED SOILS R-24, R-31 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10A (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOIL I JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-11 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOIL I JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-11 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS I AND II JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-12 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS I AND II JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-12 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS II AND III JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-13 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS II AND III JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-13 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - PLANT AREA AND SPILLWAY STRUCTURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-14 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - PLANT AREA AND SPILLWAY STRUCTURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-14 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - RIVER WATER SUPPLY LINE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-15 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - RIVER WATER SUPPLY LINE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-15 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - RIVER INTAKE STRUCTURE AND STORAGE POND INTAKE STRUCTURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-16 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - RIVER INTAKE STRUCTURE AND STORAGE POND INTAKE STRUCTURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-16 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-17 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-17 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-18 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-18 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS 1A, 1B, 2B, 2C, 3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-19 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS 1A, 1B, 2B, 2C, 3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-19 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS, BORROW AREA NO. 1 COMPACTED SOILS C-1, C-2, C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-20 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS, BORROW AREA NO. 1 COMPACTED SOILS C-1, C-2, C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-20 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS, BORROW AREA NO. 1 COMPACTED SOILS C-2, C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-21
] 
 
REV 21  5/08
[LABORATORY CYCLIC TEST RESULTS UNDISTURBED SAMPLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-1 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[LABORATORY CYCLIC TEST RESULTS UNDISTURBED SAMPLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-1 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM & DIKES RECORD OF A TYPICAL STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-1A
]
REV 21  5/08
[CASE 1 - SWITCHYARD JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-2
]
REV 21  5/08
[CASE II - PLANT AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-3
]
REV 21  5/08
[CASE III - SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-4
]
REV 21  5/08
[CASE III SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-5
]
REV 21  5/08
[CASE IV - COOLING TOWER AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-6
]
REV 21  5/08
[CASE V - RIVER INTAKE AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-7
] 
 
REV 21  5/08
[CASE VI - STORAGE POND INTAKE AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-8
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MAXIMUM DAM SECTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-9
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES TYPICAL DIKE SECTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-10
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES ACCELEROGRAM REPRESENTING THE POSTULATED SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-11
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR 5% SPECTRAL DRAWING JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-12
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES COMPARISON OF INDUCED SHEAR STRESSED WITH STRESSES REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5%
STRAIN ALONG A TYPICAL PLANE - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION AVERAGE PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-13
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION, AVERAGE PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-14
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION, UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-15
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES LOCAL FACTOR S OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5%
STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - DIKE SECTION, AVERAGE PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-16
]
REV 21  5/08
[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAI N ALONG CENTERLINE OF DIKE, AVERAGE PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-17
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 -SHEAR MODULUS VS EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-1
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT 2  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-2
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT 2  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-3
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT 2  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-4
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-5
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-6
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-7
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES EMBANKMENT MATERIAL, STRAIN-COMPATIBLE SOIL PROPERTIES USED IN ANALYSIS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-8
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTRO LLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-9
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTRO LLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-10
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTRO LLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-11
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTRO LLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-12
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTRO LLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 2.0, 5% STRAIN)
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-13
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTRO LLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-14
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTRO LLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-15
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES PROCEDURE FOR INTERPRETING STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST DATA FOR ANISOTROPICALLY CONSOLIDATED (K C > 1.0) SPECIMENS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-16
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-17
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-18
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-19
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES FOUNDATION SOILS - CYCLIC SHEAR STRE SS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-20
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-1 -COMPACTION TEST RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-21
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 -COMPACTION TEST RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-22
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 -COMPACTION TEST RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-23
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-24
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-25
]
REV 21  5/08
[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-26
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND DOWNSTREAM FILL CROSS-SECTIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-14
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND DOWNSTREAM FILL CROSS-SECTIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-15
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND UPSTREAM BL ANKET CROSS-SECTIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-16 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND UPSTREAM BL ANKET CROSS-SECTIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-16 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
] 
 
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 1 OF 5)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 2 OF 5)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 3 OF 5)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 4 OF 5)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 5 OF 5)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-18 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-18 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-19 (SHEET 1 OF 4)
]
REV 21  5/08
[SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-19 (SHEET 2 OF 4)
]
REV 21  5/08
[SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-19 (SHEET 3 OF 4)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 4 OF 5)
]
REV 21  5/08
[SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-20
]
REV 21  5/08
[BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DA M AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 1 OF 4)
]
REV 21  5/08
[BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DA M AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 2 OF 4)
]
REV 21  5/08
[BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DA M AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 3 OF 4)
]
REV 21  5/08
[BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DA M AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 4 OF 4)
]
REV 21  5/08
[GRAIN SIZED - - COMPACTED BLANKET AND UNDERLYING SOIL JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-22
]
REV 21  5/08
[COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 1 OF 4)
]
REV 21  5/08
[COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 2 OF 4)
]
REV 21  5/08
[COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 3 OF 4)
]
REV 21  5/08
[COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 4 OF 4)
]
REV 21  5/08
[MATERIAL C-5 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-24
]
REV 21  5/08
[MATERIAL C-5 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-25
]
REV 21  5/08
[MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION SHEAR MODULI NORMALIZED TO AN EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT 2  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-26
]
REV 21  5/08
[MATERIAL C-5 -95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-27
]
REV 21  5/08
[MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-28
]
REV 21  5/08
[MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-29
]
REV 21  5/08
[MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES  JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-30
]
REV 21  5/08
[MATERIAL C 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-31
]
REV 21  5/08
[MATERIAL C 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-32
]
REV 21  5/08
[MATERIAL C 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-33
]
REV 21  5/08
[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES - CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-34
]
REV 21  5/08
[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAI N ALONG CENTERLINE OF MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-35
]
REV 21  5/08
[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES - CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 AT 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-36
]
REV 21  5/08
[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAI N ALONG CENTERLINE OF MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES -
CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 AT 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-37
]
REV 21  5/08
[COMPARISON OF STRESSES AT DAM COMPUTED BY THE FINITE ELEMENT AND THE SHEAR SLICE PROCEDURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-38 (SHEET 1 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[COMPARISON OF STRESSES AT DAM COMPUTED BY THE FINITE ELEMENT AND THE SHEAR SLICE PROCEDURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-38 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
]
REV 21  5/08
[DAM EXCAVATION PLAN AND GEOLOGIC MAPS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-39A
]
REV 21  5/08
[DAM FOUNDATION GEOLOGIC MAP NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-39B
]
REV 21  5/08
[DAM FOUNDATION GEOLOGIC MAP EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-39C
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE COMPACTED FILL RECORD TESTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-40 (SHEET 1 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE COMPACTED FILL RECORD TESTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-40 (SHEET 2 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE COMPACTED FILL RECORD TESTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-40 (SHEET 3 OF 3)
]
REV 21  5/08 STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-41
 
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE CENTERLINE SUBSURFACE PROFILES AND GROUNDWATER LEVELS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-42
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND DAM AND DI KE OBSERVATION WELLS AND DRAIN DISCHARGE RATES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-43
]
REV 21  5/08
[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE GRAVITY RELIEF WELLS AND DISCHARGE RATES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-44
]}}

Latest revision as of 16:35, 2 April 2019

Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 27, Chapter 2, Figures 2B5B1-1 to 2B7-44
ML17117A366
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/20/2017
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17117A380 List:
References
NL-17-0534
Download: ML17117A366 (143)
v • d • e


Text

REV 21 5/08

[STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-1 (SHEET 1 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-1 (SHEET 2 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-1 (SHEET 3 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-2 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STATIC SOIL PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-2 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[COMPACTED STATIC SOIL STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-3 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[COMPACTED STATIC SOIL STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-3 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-4 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-4 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-5 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STATIC SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-5 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STATIC ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-6 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STATIC ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-6 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC SOIL AND ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-7 (SHEET 1 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC SOIL AND ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-7 (SHEET 2 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC SOIL AND ROCK PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-7 (SHEET 3 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOIL C-1 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-8 (SHEET 1 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOIL C-1 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-8 (SHEET 2 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOIL C-1 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-8 (SHEET 3 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-1 AND C-2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-9 (SHEET 1 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-1 AND C-2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-9 (SHEET 2 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-1 AND C-2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-9 (SHEET 3 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-2 AND C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS C-2 AND C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT COMPACTED SOILS R-24, R-31 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10A (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT COMPACTED SOILS R-24, R-31 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-10A (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOIL I JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-11 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOIL I JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-11 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS I AND II JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-12 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS I AND II JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-12 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS II AND III JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-13 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR PLANT AREA BACKFILL - - COMPACTED SOILS II AND III JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-13 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - PLANT AREA AND SPILLWAY STRUCTURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-14 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - PLANT AREA AND SPILLWAY STRUCTURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-14 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - RIVER WATER SUPPLY LINE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-15 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - RIVER WATER SUPPLY LINE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-15 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - RIVER INTAKE STRUCTURE AND STORAGE POND INTAKE STRUCTURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-16 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - RIVER INTAKE STRUCTURE AND STORAGE POND INTAKE STRUCTURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-16 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-17 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-17 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-18 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR FOUNDATION MATERIALS - - STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-18 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS 1A, 1B, 2B, 2C, 3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-19 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS - - COMPACTED SOILS 1A, 1B, 2B, 2C, 3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-19 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS, BORROW AREA NO. 1 COMPACTED SOILS C-1, C-2, C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-20 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS, BORROW AREA NO. 1 COMPACTED SOILS C-1, C-2, C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-20 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STRESS-STRAIN DIAGRAMS FOR DAM EMBANKMENT MATERIALS, BORROW AREA NO. 1 COMPACTED SOILS C-2, C-3 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B5B-21

]

REV 21 5/08

[LABORATORY CYCLIC TEST RESULTS UNDISTURBED SAMPLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-1 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[LABORATORY CYCLIC TEST RESULTS UNDISTURBED SAMPLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-1 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM & DIKES RECORD OF A TYPICAL STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-1A

]

REV 21 5/08

[CASE 1 - SWITCHYARD JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-2

]

REV 21 5/08

[CASE II - PLANT AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-3

]

REV 21 5/08

[CASE III - SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-4

]

REV 21 5/08

[CASE III SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-5

]

REV 21 5/08

[CASE IV - COOLING TOWER AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-6

]

REV 21 5/08

[CASE V - RIVER INTAKE AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-7

]

REV 21 5/08

[CASE VI - STORAGE POND INTAKE AREA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-8

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MAXIMUM DAM SECTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-9

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES TYPICAL DIKE SECTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-10

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES ACCELEROGRAM REPRESENTING THE POSTULATED SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-11

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR 5% SPECTRAL DRAWING JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-12

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES COMPARISON OF INDUCED SHEAR STRESSED WITH STRESSES REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5%

STRAIN ALONG A TYPICAL PLANE - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION AVERAGE PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-13

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION, AVERAGE PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-14

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION, UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-15

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES LOCAL FACTOR S OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5%

STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - DIKE SECTION, AVERAGE PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-16

]

REV 21 5/08

[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAI N ALONG CENTERLINE OF DIKE, AVERAGE PROPERTIES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6-17

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 -SHEAR MODULUS VS EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-1

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT 2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-2

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT 2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-3

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C SHEAR MODULI AT EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT 2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-4

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-5

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-6

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-7

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES EMBANKMENT MATERIAL, STRAIN-COMPATIBLE SOIL PROPERTIES USED IN ANALYSIS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-8

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTRO LLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-9

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTRO LLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-10

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTRO LLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-11

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTRO LLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-12

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTRO LLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 2.0, 5% STRAIN)

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-13

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTRO LLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-14

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTRO LLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-15

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES PROCEDURE FOR INTERPRETING STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST DATA FOR ANISOTROPICALLY CONSOLIDATED (K C > 1.0) SPECIMENS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-16

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-17

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-18

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-19

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES FOUNDATION SOILS - CYCLIC SHEAR STRE SS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-20

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-1 -COMPACTION TEST RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-21

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-2 -COMPACTION TEST RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-22

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C-3 -COMPACTION TEST RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-23

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-24

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-25

]

REV 21 5/08

[DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DAM AND DIKES MATERIAL C GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B6A-26

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DOWNSTREAM FILL CROSS-SECTIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-14

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DOWNSTREAM FILL CROSS-SECTIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-15

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND UPSTREAM BL ANKET CROSS-SECTIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-16 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND UPSTREAM BL ANKET CROSS-SECTIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-16 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 1 OF 5)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 2 OF 5)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 3 OF 5)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 4 OF 5)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 5 OF 5)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-18 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-18 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-19 (SHEET 1 OF 4)

]

REV 21 5/08

[SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-19 (SHEET 2 OF 4)

]

REV 21 5/08

[SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-19 (SHEET 3 OF 4)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT CREST DETAIL AND COMPACTION DATA JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-17 (SHEET 4 OF 5)

]

REV 21 5/08

[SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS SITE SLOPES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-20

]

REV 21 5/08

[BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DA M AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 1 OF 4)

]

REV 21 5/08

[BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DA M AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 2 OF 4)

]

REV 21 5/08

[BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DA M AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 3 OF 4)

]

REV 21 5/08

[BORROW MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR REDESIGN OF DA M AND DIKE 95% ASTM D-698 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-21 (SHEET 4 OF 4)

]

REV 21 5/08

[GRAIN SIZED - - COMPACTED BLANKET AND UNDERLYING SOIL JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-22

]

REV 21 5/08

[COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 1 OF 4)

]

REV 21 5/08

[COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 2 OF 4)

]

REV 21 5/08

[COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 3 OF 4)

]

REV 21 5/08

[COMPARISON OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES BORROW AREA NO. 1 AND BORROW AREA NO. 2 95 PERCENT ASTM D-1557 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-23 (SHEET 4 OF 4)

]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C-5 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-24

]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C-5 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-25

]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION SHEAR MODULI NORMALIZED TO AN EFFECTIVE MEAN NORMAL STRESS OF 1000 LB/FT 2 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-26

]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C-5 -95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION DAMPING RATIO VS. SHEAR STRAIN JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-27

]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-28

]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-29

]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-30

]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.0, 5% STRAIN)

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-31

]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION RESULTS OF STRESS-CONTROLLED CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TESTS (K C = 1.5, 5% STRAIN)

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-32

]

REV 21 5/08

[MATERIAL C 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION CYCLIC SHEAR STRESS REQUIRED TO CAUSE 5% STRAIN IN 10 CYCLES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-33

]

REV 21 5/08

[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES - CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-34

]

REV 21 5/08

[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAI N ALONG CENTERLINE OF MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 95% ASTM D698 COMPACTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-35

]

REV 21 5/08

[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAIN ALONG SELECTED HORIZONTAL PLANES - MAXIMUM DAM SECTION UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES - CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 AT 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-36

]

REV 21 5/08

[LOCAL FACTORS OF SAFETY WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT OF 5% STRAI N ALONG CENTERLINE OF MAXIMUM DAM SECTION - UPPER BOUND PROPERTIES -

CYCLIC STRENGTH MATERIAL C-5 AT 98% ASTM D698 COMPACTION JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-37

]

REV 21 5/08

[COMPARISON OF STRESSES AT DAM COMPUTED BY THE FINITE ELEMENT AND THE SHEAR SLICE PROCEDURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-38 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[COMPARISON OF STRESSES AT DAM COMPUTED BY THE FINITE ELEMENT AND THE SHEAR SLICE PROCEDURE JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-38 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

]

REV 21 5/08

[DAM EXCAVATION PLAN AND GEOLOGIC MAPS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-39A

]

REV 21 5/08

[DAM FOUNDATION GEOLOGIC MAP NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-39B

]

REV 21 5/08

[DAM FOUNDATION GEOLOGIC MAP EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-39C

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE COMPACTED FILL RECORD TESTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-40 (SHEET 1 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE COMPACTED FILL RECORD TESTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-40 (SHEET 2 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE COMPACTED FILL RECORD TESTS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-40 (SHEET 3 OF 3)

]

REV 21 5/08 STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE INSTRUMENTATION LOCATIONS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-41

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE CENTERLINE SUBSURFACE PROFILES AND GROUNDWATER LEVELS JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-42

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DI KE OBSERVATION WELLS AND DRAIN DISCHARGE RATES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-43

]

REV 21 5/08

[STORAGE POND DAM AND DIKE GRAVITY RELIEF WELLS AND DISCHARGE RATES JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 FIGURE 2B7-44

]

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17117A366&oldid=1383237"