View source for IA-96-207, Forwards Comments by NRC Re Proposed NRC Responses to Senator Schweiker & R Nader on Security Problem.Draft Responses Encl

{{Adams
| number = ML20136A697
| issue date = 09/26/1975
| title = Forwards Comments by NRC Re Proposed NRC Responses to Senator Schweiker & R Nader on Security Problem.Draft Responses Encl
| author name = Chilk S
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
| addressee name = Gossick L
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
| docket = 05000289, 05000320
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| case reference number = FOIA-96-207
| document report number = NUDOCS 7904250200
| package number = ML20125B444
| document type = INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM, MEMORANDUMS-CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 14
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
l               .                                                                                             .
gc *       ' t ,:  *:                                                          ;
F ;4.yJftCL, "i
2                                   g            I WIY l
l
     ''rjt:::
      ,i     f l'       ,
s
                                                                                                    ? . .;.
l     C;                                                                                               .
i                                                       UMTED STATES l
NUctEAR REGUtATORY COMMISSloN 4.~                                           wasmwaren, o. c. nm                                           l Yh E
l '! F i
o c.cc   m zsecarta v             September 26, 1975 l]...
i     .,          ME)!ORANDU>l FOR:      Lee V. Gossick, Executive F                                    Director for Operations i
FRO >!:               Samuel J. Chilk, Secretary            b

==SUBJECT:==
SECY       - INV;0 R T           THE ALLEGED SECURITY PROBLEM AT THREE MILE ISlAh y LEAR POWER STATION l
Attached are comments by members of the Commission concerning the proposed NRC responses to Senator Schwei*aer and Mr. Nader, Included are comments on the letters and enclosed investigation reports, ricase review the draft responses and the report for incorporation of these comments.
The revised letter and enclosures should be returned for Commissioner                          !
action by October 3, 1975.
Attachments:
Commissioner Comments cc:
Chairman Anders Commissioner Rowden
         .          Commissioner Mason Commissioner Gilinsky Commissioner Kennedy Director, Inspection 6 Enforcement                                                            ) '
Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation Director, Standards Development
          .         Executive Legal Director l
i
(
y            -y i(         $96/Z00                 VA     / VAT)                               gri- 251
                    ~
           */               5%                                         7 9.0~475-0'600 fl

l ]!-
1  A,        .
l     __
i i
('
)
h
!       '.        1-:onorable Richarda. S. Schweiker                                 *
      .f .
      ~
i tie appreciate your concerns as it is cur belief that physical protection i
p'rogra=s for nuclear power reactors =est be carefully for=ulated.
l                 cvaluated, i=ple=ented and inspcceed, tie consider adequate physical I
;                  security to be a =atter of high priority.
4 Thank you for your interest in this =atter.                                                                                   .
i j                                                                                          Sincerely,
}
1
'                                                                                          William A. Anders Chair =an

==Enclosure:==

Investigation Report No. 50-289/75-18 1
1 7 F.' M 3 4
e

                                 -~~            -       -            __          _ _ _ _ _ _ _     ,
,    Ol.
                  .-       .                                                                                         g
;     4 .-                   ,
                                                                                                                      \(
                                                                                                                      \t i
                   ".r. Ralph Nader 2000 "P" Street, N.U.                  -
'                   7th Floor                              '
Usshington, D.C.               20036
)

==Dear Mr. Nader:==

This is 1. rasponse to your letter of June 4.1775, in which you request an investigation of security operations at all nucle:r power 4
plante. Your request is prompted by " ... the serious probic:s at Three Mile Island and M111stene."
i a
:                                                                                                                                    j j
An investigation has been co:pleted of the z.llegations cade by the two former watchmen who were e= ployed at the Metropolitan Edison i
Company's Three Mile Island site. A copy of the investigation report is enclosed,           We found that the physical protection progrs:s currently
                                                                           &17. ,.:wt
                                                                                                     ~
th; .... w ir.s tar.: r in scets all applicable NRC requirc=ents.                                                                          i m e_.
: r. -p ,.. . < --3=;;;;;;; 7, ; A I                                                                                              -
                     .+4,w      < z ,     -<n-e   4, m M .         . f.
e c 5the infractions had been identified and corrected by the c
licensye independently of the infor:ation provided by the two                         former e oibed    itu t c    d<.cc l                                                                                                              '" **b"' p' catchmen.
eg        Furthermore,theissuesofsecessandkey,[ontro1Yro          ,
i identif ed and correctivo action verified as a result of URC inspections t
K~
: u.    ..
                                                                                                                            .: A 4_       " ''[e,h,,p .
in only three nstances were Infractions note:! In the complete implementatio l          F of the physical protection program; namely, the inadequ::ry of control ovar gato locks and keys, inadequacy of the system of access contrnt to prin buildings, and the entry of a watchman into the Control Room.
        ~
4

T                         1
  .:d.-r *
                                               ' l' ,
l           .                                                                                                       .
  .a
[2 l -
l I
y.r. Ralph Nadar            -                      ~2-Corrections of security itens of noncenpliance at Millotone were verified F                   ,
by direct observation of ERC inspeerors. Of further          1      /
interest is the fact j
e[torswere                  t the Millstone site o April 11, when thatourinsp/
                     /                                {esent a//
a bonb threat and a fir of s sus icious origin occur ed.                           Our in pectors
                  /               /                                       /            /
ro eCures re utred by IEC were efficiently and effec-
                                                                                                      /
            ,/velyf./ observed t..at the p/                /
ti               ollowed by the utili,ty. .
(
              /.c a result of the above findings and inspection efforts, ue do not consider that there are serious prob 1cus at the Three Mile Island and Millstone cites. He believe our existing inspection program is suf-10 L'tb #,a.
ficient to identify problensjand
* h% 4 im) aNs c     c. in ne (o{.see.necessaryb
                                                                                       *4 ti ih               ri-j %;LtT.
Due to the addition of the requirecent for reactor physical security plans in April 1974, and subsequent revisions of reactor license con-ditict.s, we have devoted special attention to the inspection of physical
: r. curity during the last year. Since March 1974,12C inspectors have devor.ed in excess of 200 can-days at forty-one plant sites inspecting phycical security. Physical security reviews and inspections are conducted __ _
Unannounced reinspections prior to the issuance of operating licenses.
at operating plants are part of our routine inspection progran.
: 77. .n . ..~-ae .

ace .          .
n A
* A's e
* g}pti..L ,
, y       .s.   ,           .
: i.                 -
  ?,.y i 5!:
::r. Ralph :tador                                         fh" l
E             te a      se picmed Evve                                                                                                       A64kle,
   -            f,ng.c::3h our investipA     3ations revealed         ht no serious items of nonec=pliance,[ it
!                L. cur belief that physical protection progre=s for nuclear power reactors t
nust be carefully formulated, evaluated, implemented and inspected. We
]
consider cdequate physical ' security to be a natter of continuing high i
priority.
l i
l j
Sincerely, l
7 T099 C C 124114em A- And ws                                ,
Chimn i

==Enclosure:==

Investigation Report No. 50-2d9/75-18 CW'    r* t 4 s
                                                                                                                      # /e   . . e ,' '4) s N N *O

$                                         ;? ct
* W**N ',*.*, ;D -                 --
i   Q %.3 7 . ,, .c         -
j l
y [h        c'                       ,
i
     ,$,   s,', f*
;    4 ;.                 .
:               i.": '
l   t r;.
i   ; '.
a               ,'
l     f.        Ti-4       . . .
:.g:'
p.Y j     +3L i*     !L
:. t
           ;                                 It is suggested that the investigation report be expanded i
l from the sentence, "The causes of the layoffs were complex l
but did not relate to a lack of security consciousness by licensee management." to explain specifically why the men
;                                            were laid off.                                                        .
?
I 1
s l
l 1
i I
!                                                                                                                                                                  l i
t l
* l k
l          I 4
            *4 i
I
            ^
i l
                                                                                                                           ~
l                                                                                                               r.
r~i.?
1 7t'.     .
{ .-
t l
k<                              - ,.
u 1 -                                                                                                                                                          . -
9 d

                                                             .r i                           CP v' n ~g.-    .~1                c, "r             ,
s:
a
  ;                 h' l                f.llonorable Richard S. Schwaiker                                                               -
l i                8 United States Senate
                                 -                                                                                             l tu                             .
1               " Dear. Senator Schweiheri
     ?
                      $This ,is in response to your letter of June 6,1975, requesting an inves                                 !
{ ,           ,.
h Three                   l k;by the !!uclear Regulatory Co:rmission of of                            the theallegations            conl
                                   ,,                                                                  fccility.
Hile Island !!uclear power Station made by two former watchmen                                          l
{@"
k An investigation has been completed of the allegations made by the tuo former A copy of the 5               watchmen at the raetropolitan Edison's Three Mile Island site.
5 investigation report is enclosed.                             ,
The I:3C investigation has identified three infractions of agency regulations.
These relate to the inadequacy of control over gate locks and keys; the inadequa of the system of access control to principal buildings; and the ent'ry of a watchl into the Control Room.       It should be noted that these conditions occurred 'and made their allegations.
              .           were corrected well before the watchmen f.
l The allegation that a gate was removed from its hinges was confirmed, thoug                          ;
t..                      ..
The inv'estigation        l the incident did not result in a threat to the plant's security.
                 .hfurther found that the watchmen's dismissal was not related to their l
[J'  $ ' reDarding security. One allegation dealt with security conditions at anoth                                  l ki                                                                 This plant is still under 5           nuclear plant in the same Three Mile Island complex.
Other
:[c               construction and is not yet subject to NRC's security requirements.
[
           ?. *
             "              allegations related to conditions, below the level of infractions, which These include the report' of corrected prior to the date of the allegations.                                             J'     ;
t . .'
M                  problems with the elcetronic surveillance system and the allegation( tha w
7                                                  .
Still    t several occasions, patrols,were falsely logged in as having taken place.
I(        ~.'     other allegations were not confirmed. The I:RC is fully satisfied that at this tw RC requirenents J time the plant's physical protection program meets all applicable i i

_            ,       y               aa A: s   aa -4.
                                                                                                                                                =.'
  .f[;;ay'*
i 3:.. . ; .-
2-
                                                                                                                                                  \
flll VQ.
Due      to      the     addition       of   the    requirement                  for       reactor           physica
                       . in April 1974, and subsequent revisions of reactor license conditions, tre have l[ devoted special attention to the inspection of physical security during the
: s. last year. Since 14 arch 1974, ilRC inspectors have devoted in excess of 200 man-
    ,+
    ~
days at forty-one plant sites inspecting physical security.                      Physical security reviews and inspections are ' conducted ' prior to the issuance of operating licenses.
Unannounced reinspections at operating plants are part of our routine inspectica program.      .
      ;g,
      .y
                         !!e appreciate your concerns.          It is our belief that physical protection programs
              ' ). for nuclear power reactors must be carefully formulated, evaluated, implemented and inspected. lie consider adequate physical security to be a matter of                                    -
high priority.                                    .
Thank you for your interest in this matter.                                                           .
Sincerely,                                                             !
                                                                                                                                                  \
115111am A. Anders
* Chairman                                *

==Enclosure:==

Investigation Report f;o. 50-289/75-18 6
9
* T,0
           ':3 c                                                                                                 97,-(6 4/s M,
: s.          '
s

                                                                                        =^-
                                      .,;*                  Qig                                                                -~m.:y E'                                            y@;.
                                                                                                              ;,     ~.~;.r;;~y.;;;f3!i:@y.y,,
W                        ?               ;il    .y.y..y. . .. I . . . .
y
:;,b.#@,?".;' .5                                                                  ycs y'            > .Q; ;L Q}lqif.                  WD-  .
                     + :. . . aMwr;.                                                                     ; p.
y                                                                 A
                                                         ; 9 p.,           4~.y;;  .y, @$                    N,; &c .%~;;g           ; Q e.:,.:.v g                     ,::gg; . :x. ; ,
                    ,;;g;s;
                                                    ,n.   ,
                                                     .. w . s .- ' . . -
                                                                     .s.                                 w .
r.
                                                 . . ~,; ,dW +y.Q.m ,. , :t. nQ                                                E. . ''.MA,W;'.;' '
                                                  .                                        ./
                      .[;!c ' a .       .
                                                                                                                          ~ c #, . . . . c.
i lle. P.a1ph Hader? @'*
* fi *
                                                                                                                  '1 9        'f            -   P
                                                                                                                                                              ,.M[
EM2030>"P" Street.1H.'WN}M,'k't                                                                     Q.jyEd3M: , '                                                                         -         '
cW% %                                          ::
   ; - '                                                                                                             m.                                '
7 th Fi cori ?': t.'d ~ Y 4 M~                      ~
                                                                                             ~n                                                                                  >
  !                                                                                                                                         M'a W T. . .. E.?                      .
D'~.D f?&pg Y: $VQ                                                 "''    Q             M         .:
y@Machington   W pnWelQ f D. C'.720036W

==Dear                                                                                                Mr.'.flader:==
zNy
:             t g                                   ;?$gg                   1,t.
uumw$w      .     . 0   d  g:c.         N ..
1 pc.w w w %p% hwu: V:
O.This is in response to your, letter'of June 4.'1975,-iri which you r'equest y,
an
                                                                                    .g                                                                  :               ~
: 4.                                          .
,    htfinvestigation of security operations at all nuclear po.wer plants._ :Your request
:      da                                                                .
y;q i.s prompted byl" ... the serious problems at Three Mile Island and M111stene."
: c. .g      .                                                                .,
:y . . a                             ,
     $n 1y An inves'tigation has been completed of the allegations made by the' two former y:s '
g4', watchmen at the Metropolitan Edison's Three Mile I,sland site. A copy of the
       /w,~gQ investigation' report is enclosed.
A:
        .. c1 i% The flRC investigation has identified three infractions of agency regulations.                                                                                                            -
       .h' l
        $. ':. These relate to the inadequacy of control over gate locks and keys; the inadequacy 1,                                                                                                         .
i        ( ., of the system of access control to principal buildings; and the entry of a uatchmn 4
into the Control Room.                                It should be noted that these conditions occurred and 4
          .;6               were corrected well before the watchmen made their allegations.                                                                                                    .
M
         '.:      g                             .                                                                                                                              .
R7The allegation that a gate was removed from its hinges was confirnied, though                                                                                                              .
llr:'.
                     ,. the incident did not result in a threat to the nlant's security. .~ The investigation                                                           .
         ,     -         +       .
                                                                   .w      .
                                                                                                .     .~                                    .                             ..
:.- further found that the watchmen's dismissal was not related to their complaint hi
         ? .'f[; -.h<- regarding security [ One allegation v ..                                            .
nuclear' plant in the same Three Mile Island complex. This plant is still,under 1lt.
b                  construction and is not yet subject to tiRC's security requirements.' Other' v .
M..W - allegations related to cor$ditions, below the level of infr                                                                                                                                     e w
corrected' prior to th'e date of the allegations. 'These include the report of d .4:,v                 .,     1., c. .. :< 1                      dr                                                .           . .n4.                                               ..
h; i
f           iproblems with.theTelectroni.c -c surveillance system and the allegation that on &
i i                                                   ; .;q;p..:.. w >
m ? % .. . i3mv                                                                  ,                        L%
M;%:.y                   'i.";f o;ns ,t patrol s were,fal                                               selyes.l having     ogged               .i k,4y severa11occas                                                                                                                  _taken           place. Stiil N
kNV%4afog ere'nobconfirmed.i thertallegations                        w%%%),5.Mihi&Th'e:t:P.C                           :tw%:4.:is~             4.f.y.eM.%.+.
fully' satisfied that at this

es
   ~
i."1 inspectors have also verified the correction of certain items of non-cceplience i; the physical security progrcm at f4illstone.
On to the addition of the requirement for rea: tor physical security plans in April 1974. und subsequent revisions fo reactor license conditions, we have                  ,
davoted special attention to the inspection of physical security during the last             l
                                                                                                )
year. Since flarch 1974, ICC inspectors have devoted in excess of 200 man-days           l J
at forty-cne plant sites inspecting physical security.            Physical security reviews  ]
and inspections are conducted prior to the issuance of operating licenses.
Unannounced reinspections at operating plants are part of our routine inspection program.
As a result of the above finding,I and inspection efforts, we do not consider that there are serious security problems at the Three flile Island and fillistone sites.         l
    !!a believe our inspection program is able to identify problems and-insure necessary 'orrective action in a timely manner.                                            l 1:e appreciate your concerns. It is our belief that physical protection programs for nuclear power reactors must be carefully formulated, evaluated, implemented and inspected.     !!e consider adequate physical security to be a matter of high nriority.
Thank you for your interest in this patter.
Sincerely, ch
                                                  ! llliam A. An:!ces              r*Q,'
                                 -                Chaircan Enclosura:
Investigation P.eport l1o. 50-289/75-18                                                      -

       /                                                                                                 -
3 September 1975 l
1                                                                                                                               '
                                                                                                     -                                     I i
FROM:                   Comissioner Gilinsky                                             .

==SUBJECT:==
Coments on SECY 75-454. Three title Island Investigation                       _
i
: 1.          Page 24. Apparently the jobs offered to the men were indeed i
comparable to their jobs at TMI. The text, however, indicates only that the salaries were the same and that the location of the offered jobs were nearby. The fact that the jobs were comparable in all respects should be expressly stated.
: 2.           Page 29. The first paragraph of subsection "c" should be rephrased. Ilhile it is. technically true that the allegations                             ,
were not borne out because the records were falsified by certain guards, rather than guard serceants,it is misleading to state that there is'no basis" for the allegations. This paragraph                                       ,
should acknowledge that falsifications were made, though not, as Darcy and Shapiro alleged, by BISS sergeants.
                                                                                                                           ~_
su
: 3.           Pages 33-39. This section, especially subsection c on page 39, should be reworked to explain why certain witnesses were believed while others were not,and a coherent statement of what we*think N
1.appened should be given. Secondly, the failure to interview                                       w t              N i tiitness ''Q"             as to whether he ser arried fir 4rms should bk.                           g, s
explained. Third, the identity (letter designation) of the two

                      . . ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ . _ . . . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . .
i w.
I l
i l
guards who apparently failed the firearms training course should i
j                                      be stated so that it can be determined whether they ever carried                                                                 -
firearms.                   Finally, evidence fro.i the 'og indicating which guards                                                l l
!                 ,                    stare issued firearms should be included to corroborate our view i
i                                      of the facts.                              -
i.
l
~
cc:          S.J. Chilk, SECY                                                                                                 'i i
i i
i i                                                                                                                  .
                                                                                                                                                        'J i
72-263                                                   -
1 i
J l
i                                                                                                                                   -                              .-

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO .1MISS10N W ASHINGTON. D. C. 20585 1
CPPl:C OP THE COMMISSIONER August 28, 1975 NOTE FOR COMMISSIONER MASON:
:                        SECY-75-454 IN" STIGATION OF THE ALLEGED SECURITY PROBLEM AT THPEE-MILE ISLAND This package contains two letters - one to Senator Schweiker; the other to Nader, both of which were related to the Three-Mile Island station. (I should mention that Nader also referred to the security problem at Millstone.)                    I think that both letters are acceptuble.               However,         I would add the following paragraph as a third paragraph to Senator Schweiker's letter which would state rg"Due to the addition of the requirement for reactor physical security plants in April, 7            1974, in subsequent revisions of reactor license conditions, we have devoted special attention to the inspection of physical                     security at all plants Since March, 1974, NRC during the lost year.
inspectors have devoted an excess of 200 man days at 41 plant sites inspecting physical security.       Physical security reviews and inspections                       j are conducted prior to the issuance of operating licensus,      and continued unannounced reinspections                           i f
e      occur at operating plants."
t
                                                                                                                 ~      '
ss                                 Larry cc        J. Hard b
n
                                     .v; u.jk.x                  s
                                                                  )      -
H ~... . .         m:
v ~4 se7 l          %                       ,      "l%"26%                                    ([ L.
{,h),                                                                                9 n'
                               --                                                                                       l}}