View source for IA-86-489, Responds to FOIA Request.Forwards SALP Input for Following Cycles:Jul 1979 - Dec 1980,Jul 1981 - Dec 1982 & Jan 1983 - June 1984.Documents Also Available in PDR

{{Adams
| number = ML20211Q945
| issue date = 07/23/1986
| title = Responds to FOIA Request.Forwards SALP Input for Following Cycles:Jul 1979 - Dec 1980,Jul 1981 - Dec 1982 & Jan 1983 - June 1984.Documents Also Available in PDR
| author name = Grimsley D
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
| addressee name = Hale C
| addressee affiliation = TECHNICAL ANALYSIS CORP.
| docket = 05000275, 05000323
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| case reference number = FOIA-86-489, RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737
| document report number = NUDOCS 8607280064
| package number = ML20197F919
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO ENGINEERING/CONSTRUCTION/CONSULTING FIRM, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 3
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:,             _  _.
      ~
                        .                                                     PDf-04;,
e nto                                 UNITED STATES
               'o                NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[               o                   W ASHIN G10N, D. C. 20555 s               i
  %            ~*
JUL 2 31986
   %...../
Mr. Clark R. Hale Technical Analysis Corporation 23 Truett Street                                              IN RESPONSE REFEh San Francisco, CA           94108                             TO FOIA-86-489

==Dear Mr         Hale:==

This is in regard to your request, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, to which t,he NRC assigned the above number.
_ _ _        This is a partial response to your request. We will notify you upon completion of search for and review of any additional records subject to your request.
X       The staff has completed the search for and review of records subject to your request, and this is the final response to your request.
The NRC has no records subject to your request.
Records subject to your request are available for public inspection and copying at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), 1717 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20555, as noted on the enclosure (s).       The PDR accession number is
,                    identified beside each record description.
_X__         Records subject to your request are being made available for public inspection and copying at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), 1717 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20555, in the PDR file folder under the above number and your name. These records are listed on the enclosure (s).
        .l_.         We are enclosing a notice that provides information about             I' charges and procedures for obtaining records from the P.DR.
Sincerely, h                   l Donnie H. Grimsley, Director Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration              l Enclosure (s):        As stated 8607280064 860723 PDR       FOIA         PDR HALE 86-489 l
1 a

          ~
Re: F01A-86-489 Appendix SALP 7/1/81 - 12/31/82                                                                                                                   l
: 1.               2/15/83    Memorandum from Buckley/Schierling                                                                          l to Eisenhut. (6 pages)
: 2.                3/24/83   Memorandum form Knighton to Bishop.
(1 page)
: 3.                3/24/83   Memorandum from Schierling to                                                                                l Eisenhut. (4 pages)
SALP 1/1/83 - 6/30/84
: 4.                5/2/84    Memorandum from Houston to Novak.                                                                            ,
(3 pages)                                                                                                   l
: 5.                7/10/84   Memorandum from Houston to Novak.
  ,                                            (3 pages)
: 6.                8/3/84    Memorandum from Rubenstein to Novak.
(4 pages)
: 7.                8/20/84    Note from Noonan to Schierling.
(2pages)
: 8.                9/10/84    Note from Heishman to Schierling.                                                                           I (3 pages)                                                                                                   j 1
: 9.                9/26/84    Memorandum from Crocker to                                                                                  i Schierling. (2 pages)
: 10.                9/28/84   Memorandum from Brocoum to Knighton.       (3 pages)
: 11. 9/26/84                  Note from Kubicki to Schierling.
(2 pages) l                  12.              10/1/84    Memorandum from Holahan to Schierling.       (1 page)
: 13.              10/1/84    Memorandum from Yin to Schierling.
(3 pages)
I 4
    ._.   ._. . . - _ . - . . _ _ _          _ . _ _ - - _ - .        _   _ _ _ .~__ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - __            . _ . , _ . . - ,_          . _ - - - .

a.
: 14. 10/3/84   Memorandum from Butler to Knighton. (2 pages)
Notes to Schierling from Anderson,   I
: 15. 9/84-10/84 Polk: Hart 7 man and Bosnak Walker, 3          ,
Wermiel, Lasher, Polk, Witt, Manoly,  I Hartzmen, and Sullivan.   (11 pages)
: 16. 10/9/84  Memorandum from Schierling to Bishop. (6 pages) l 1
I
                                                       )
4 1
i

N-             e 1A>                  "
1 DISTRIBUTION Document Control 50-275/323 FEB 151983                                                      NSIC PRC System LB#3 Reading Docket Nos.: 50-275                                                                                                             JLee and 50-323                                                                                                  HSchierling                               .
BBuckley iMNovak MEMORANDU!! FOR: Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director                                                                                    rney, ORD
* Division of Licensing THRU:                                      Thomas M. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing Division of Licensing George W. Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing FROM:                                      B. Buckley, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing Hans Schierling, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing

==SUBJECT:==
DIABLO CANYON UNITS 1 AND 2 Enclosed is the NRP, input for the Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 Cycle 3 SALP evaluation. The input from the appropriate NRR and IE Divisions has been factored in the overall ratings.
Bart Buckley, Project !!anager Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing
                                                                                                                                                  ~
Hans Schierling, Project !!anager Licensing Branch No. 3 g                                                                                     . Division of Licensing

==Enclosure:==

As stated f
cc:          D. V.irsch, Region V n m ..m                          on,4nn v k
m             n n                                                                      i or ,ic > .. .. .. .....C,h,h,[,hhh,1 p,h,),,,,,,,    ,               , ,,,, , ,,, , ,, ,,
                                                                                                 ,D,l.,,kh,,                               ,,DL,;,L B,1,3..!,*..'.,
[
                                                                                                                                                                            . 0.L 013. /
eumme >      ......................                                                            .BBudkley/.yt                               HSchi
                                                                                                                                              .........e..r l.i n g
                                                  ....................   ......................   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  ..             . . . . . . . . . . G..U.Y.n...i's..h..t..o..n....
em>      . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      ................... . . . . . . . . .        2l1.\.l.83... ..... . 2[..L8 3 . .. . . . 21LL8.3.... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ac ronu ais po aos uncu o24o                                              OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                                                                                                 uwoam-m n D T 2-                                                                                                                                             _'             _

W
                    ,.s FACILITY HAME:                                DIABLO CANYON, Units 1 and 2                                              -
LICENSEE:                                     Pacific Gas and Electric Company HRR PROJECT MANAGEP.: Bart C. Buckley/Hans Schierling
: 1.              INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of an evaluation of the licensee, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, in the functional area of licensing activities. It is intended to provide NRR's input to the SALP review process as described in NRC I4anual Chapter 0516. The review covers the period July 1,1981 to Decenber 31, 1982. liore than 90 percent of all licensing activities was associated with Unit 1.
The basic approach used for this evaluation was to first select a nunber of licensing issues which involved a significant anount of staff nanpower. Connents were then solicited frou the staff. In nost cases the staff applied the evaluation criteria for the per-fornance attributes based on their experience with the licensee or his products. Finally, this infornation was assenbled in a natrix
'                                      which allowed an overall evaluation of the licensee's perfornance.
This evaluation is based on staff input fron five branches in three MRR divisions and from one branch fron the Division of Energency Preparedness, DIE.
II.               Sunr.ary of Results NRC Manual Chapter 0516 specifies that each functional area evaluated will be assigned a perfornance category based on a conposite of a nunber of attributes. The single final rating should be tenpered with judgenent with respect to the significance of in.!ividual elenents.
Based on this approach, the perfornance of the Pacific Gas & Electric Company in the functional area - Licensing Activities - is rated category 2.
III.                Criteria Evaluation criteria, as given in HRC Manual Chapter Appendix 0516 Table 1, uere used for this evaluation.
onoce >     . . . . . . . . . . . .   .................          .. . . ...                  . . . . . . . . .   ,.           .
EUAhAME)        .................        .-
r svg)     .. . . . . . . . . .         . . . .
                                                                ...l . . . . . .                 .. . . . .             . . . . . .   .     .        . .         . . .         ..
tw u sia po sa racu o24o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                                                                   uwo. wn-m3

                                                                 -d 4
IV.               Perfonsance Analysis The licensee's perfoniance evaluation is based on a consideration of seven attributes as given in the t.RC Hanual Chapter. For nost of the licensing actions considered in this evaluation, only three or four of the attributes were of significance. Thus, the c&.posite rating is heavily based on the following attributes:
                                                            - Managenent involvenent
                                                            - Approach to resolution of technical issues
                                                            - Responsiveness
                                                           - Staffing With the exception of Enforcement History, for which there stas.no basis within NRR for evaluation, the renaining attributes of
                                                          - Reportable events
                                                          - Training were judged to apply only to a few licensing activities.
The evaluation was based on our review of the following licensing activities:
                                                          - Equipnent Qualification
                                                          - Greakwater Structure
'                                                         - Control of Heavy Loads
                                                         - Operator Licensing
                                                         - Independent Design Verifcation Progran (IDVP)
                                                         - Energency P.esponse Capability                                                      ,
A. Managenent Involvenent in Assuring Quality The overall rating for this criterion is category 2. An exanale of nanager.ent involvement was their early connitment, en its own initiative, to postpone fuel loading upon discovery of the seismic discrepancies at the plant in Septenber 1981.                               Initial canagement involvement in the area of the design verification effort was linited, hovever subsequent nanagement attention has significantly increased.
Other areas where uaqaSenent involvenent was evident is its participation in equipment qualification and the breakwater repair where large allocation 11f resources were approved to undertake extensive breakwater model studies.
onicc p                    .       .            . . . .     .             .        .     . . . .
l j
suxme )       . . . . . . . . . . . .     ........          .       .. ..
our>     . . . . . . . . .           . . . . .     .    .     .
ac rew 3u as:; r. ace ::4o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                                                    w e e-a.    .

                                                                                                                                                                                                          /
* B. Approach to Resolution of Technical Issues fron a Safety Standpoint The overall rating for this criterion is category 1. There is consistent evidence of planning and assignaent of priorities; decision making is at a level that ensures nanagenent review.                                                                                                                   ,
C. Responsiveness For individual licensing actions exanined for this assessnent, category ratings varied from 1 to 3.                                          The licensee peerformance in only one of the actions exanined was judged to fall into                                                                                                              ,'
category 3 and that was in regard to control of heavy loads
(!;UP.EG-0612 ) .
In other areas the licensce's responsivenes.s is judged to be tinely with resolutions proposed usually acceptahle with little or no nod,1fication reouired. The overall rating is category 2.
D. Enforcenent History There is no basis for an NRR evaluation of this criterion.
E. Reportable Events
* The overall rating for this Category is 2.
The Pacific Gas & Electric Conpany pro 7ptly notified the NRC on Septenber 28, 1981, prior to fuel ever being loaded into the core, of the seismic discrepancies found at the plant which resulted in license suspension and the initiation of the IDVP. LERs will be evaluated by the Diablo Canyon resident inspectors in accordance with 11r. T. Bishop's nenorandun dated January 21, 1933.
F. Staffing Category 1 is assigned based on a linited basis' for evaluation only.
The nunber of qualified plant operators exceed the number of operators required for full power operations of Diablo Canyon Unit 1.
G. Training The everall rating for this criterion is category 1. The licensee has a defined training progran for the station staff. With respect l
l OFF8CE )    . ... . . .               ... . . . . ...             . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             . . . . . . .     . . . . . . . . . . . .              . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                             ............l............... . .                . . . . . . . . . . . . .   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
DATE )   ..        . . . ....        . . . . . . . . . .      . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       . . . . . . . . .          . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                                                                                                                 ..............)
s.c roa t s:s os-p rx .t e:c OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                                                                                                 um im-sm .

I 1
l l
1 to the operator licensing orogram, four R0 and twenty three SRO examinacions were niven during the evaluation period with an overall passing rate of 81.5%. The Training Progran at Diablo Canyon is considered to provide a good understanding of work and adherence to procedures.
V.            Conclusion Eased on the evaluation of the Pacific Gas a Electirc Company's perfornance for a number of significant activities in the functional area of ' licensing with     respect to the seven criteria, an overall performance rating of category 2 is determined. Specifically, canagenent attention and involvenent with the resolution of natters of nuclear safety is evident by senior managenent participation in the IDVP.
OFFeCE *r     .    . . . . . .
fDaNAMEh      . . . . . . .    . . .
                                   ...I.....................
3 o.n y          . . . .
 ,c:c roau m pm, uacu ono OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                                                                                                       usc e mi- mi.:4 L                 -

                                                                                                                    ~
1ABLO C. ANyo Al llN)TS I42              EVALURTION MATR!X
                    ?ICENSING              MG MT. RPPR o AcH  REspossive-ENFORCEN#T REPoRm!3LE STAFFlh/G TRptfilNf A6 TION               W0Y"'  n RESOLUTION    NE55       HISTORY    Ev ENTS eautPmEN T QuM.\Mt ATibs            %           2,         A         NA        N/A            WA      #4 STRUCTU                  l            }         }         d!A      NA           .k    r M/A CO NTROL OF                                                             /
Heavy LoAos               S            L         3          N/A                              2-N/A            N/A
                   $$Y$l                    N/A          N/A        N/A        N/A       N/A            I       /       _
1M:":
pro G o hm           .
x             i        x          als        z              i      als
                   %?sW"M cAPAbt.ITY                  l          \-                   NJA       z.     .
                                                                                                        )      ~)
oyer A LL                 L            /         P-        N/A         J-            /       /
- - - - - - - -            -   - - - - -      -       --          -                                               -}}