View source for A04948, Forwards Clarifications of Rev 11 to Modified Amended Security Plan,Per 850612 & 19 Commitments.Clarifications Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21 & 2.790)

{{Adams
| number = ML20129D788
| issue date = 06/28/1985
| title = Forwards Clarifications of Rev 11 to Modified Amended Security Plan,Per 850612 & 19 Commitments.Clarifications Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21 & 2.790)
| author name = Opeka J
| author affiliation = CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO.
| addressee name = Martin T
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION &amp; ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
| docket = 05000213
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| document report number = A04948, A4948, NUDOCS 8507160651
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 2
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:,
( gr-anAy l
             .                                                                                            \     u d:
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY                                                      7* b B E R L I N. CONNECTICUT
       'M                                                              P  B X 270  HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06141-0270 MEGUARDS INF3ay;I;DU IF ATTACH!n,to"T UPOU2e""aMTiOU This LETTER IS                             DECONTROLLED Stne  28,1985
                                                                                                 /            //
Docket No. 50-213              /I      YM //
A04948 Mr. Thomas T. Martin, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards Region I, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406

==References:==
(1)  W. G. Counsil letter to T. E. Murley, dated January 25,1985.
(2)  T. T. Martin letter to 3. F. Opeka, dated May 30,1985.
Gentlemen:
Haddam Neck Plant Modified Amended Security Plan, Revision 11 in Reference (1) Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (CYAPCO) submitted to the Staff, pursuant to 10CFR50.54(p), Revision 11 to the Haddam Neck Plant Modified Amended Security Plan (MASP). In Reference (2) the Staff reviewed the Reference (1) submittal and determined that portions of the proposed Revision were not acceptable.
CYAPCO maintains its position that the Reference (1) Revision meets the intent of 10CFR50.54(p) and does not degrade the physical security plan. As discussed with the Staff on June 12 and 19,1985, clarifications of the Reference (1)
Revision, with further elaboration and modification, are provided as Attachment
: 1. Figure 3-2 and pages 6-12 and 7-3 are provided as replacements for the corresponding pages in the Reference (1) submittal.
Pursuant to 10CFR73.21(b), the MASP is considered safeguards information and, as such, it is required that the MASP be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10CFR2.790(d).
We trust you will find this information satisfactory.
Very truly yours, CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION IN ATTAC p                    .
9N    SEPARATION             THis    LETTER is opg DEC g
1                                                 3Eiilor Vice President                         c 0l 0
L-                                                                                               [
ga72mu Mha                                                                          i A
F

  'A-
            ..                                                    i cc:. Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attn: Mr. John A. Zwolinski, Chief '
Operating Reactors Branch #5
             ~ U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION.IN ATTACHMENT UPON SEPARATION THIS LETTER IS DECONTROLLED}}