U-604269, Operational Safety Review Team (Osart) Follow Up Mission Report

From kanterella
(Redirected from U-604269)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Operational Safety Review Team (Osart) Follow Up Mission Report
ML16105A276
Person / Time
Site: Clinton 
(NPF-062)
Issue date: 03/02/2016
From: Stoner T
Exelon Generation Co
To:
Document Control Desk
VRodriguez, 415-1006
Shared Package
ML16105a271 List:
References
U-604269
Download: ML16105A276 (3)


Text

Exeton Generation Clinton Power Station 8401 Power Road Clinton, IL 67727 U-604269 March 2,

2016 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 Facility Operating License No. NPF-62 NRC Docket No. 50-461

Subject:

Clinton Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) Follow Up Mission Report This letter provides notification to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that Exelon Generation Company, LLC has no concerns with the NRCs intention to make the Clinton Power Station Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) Follow Up Mission Report dated February 2016, available to the public.

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this report.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Dale Shelton, Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (217) 937-2800.

Respectfully, Theodore A. Stoner Site Vice President Clinton Power Station DRNcas cc:

Regional Administrator NRC Region Ill NRC Senior Resident Inspector Clinton Power Station Office of Nuclear Facility Safety IEMA Division of Nuclear Safety

U-604269

Subject:

Clinton Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) Follow Up Mission Report bcc:

NRC Project Manager, NRR Clinton Power Station Institute of Nuclear Power Operations Manager Licensing, Clinton Power Station (Cantera)

Director Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, West (Cantera)

Exelon Document Control Desk Licensing T. R. Stoner B. T. Kapellas C. D. Dunn S. A. Gackstetter J. E. Cunningham C. J. Propst D. A. Shelton B. E. Brooks R. B. Champley S. Mischke

I Exeton Generation TYPICAL LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENCE CONCURRENCE FORM Station(s): Clinton Power Station Correspondence No.:

U-604269 Subject/Document: Clinton Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) Follow Up Mission Report Document Prepared by:

D. Avery Location:

CPS Extension:

281 5 Required Review and Disciplines Assigned by:

D. Avery

/ Sr. ReQ.Engineer Title Due Date:

Type of Review Required:

Technical Verification Team Review (Reference LS-AA-1 17)

X Individual or Series Review No Technical Review Note:

If the subject document falls within the scope of AD-AA-1 02, Station Qualified Review, one of the reviewers must be a Station Qualified Reviewer.

Disciplines Requited:

Maintenance Radiation Protection Chemistry Training Operations Engineering I&C Radwaste x

Reg Assurance / Licensing Rx Engineering Design Engineering Engr

- Mech Systems Programs Engineering Nuclear Fuels Work Management Engr

- Elect Systems Other: Security Review Concurrence: Signature indicates that the individual has reviewed the subject document and concurs that the content is factual and accurate. Concurrence via e-mail shall be provided using the declaration provided in LS-AA-1 17.

Print Name I Signature Discipline Date Does this letter contain commitments? LI Yes X No If yes, corporate or site commitment coordinator has been notified:

Required Reviews and Signatures (check as appropriate):

LI Station Qualified Review Required:

PORC Approval Required: PORC Meeting No.

LI Corporate Licensing Concurrence Required:

X Site Regulatory Assurance X Station Manager Approval Required:

X Site Vice President Approval Required:

Note: The completed original of this form will be retained by the organization transmitting the submittal (i.e.,

either Licensing or site Regulatory Assurance) in accordance with RM-AA-1O1, Records Management Program.

Date:

Date:

Date:

Date:

Date:./ 1kg Date: -V/2t SRRS 5A.1 13

Exeton Generation Clinton Power Station 8401 Power Road Clinton, IL 67727 U-604269 March 2,

2016 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 Facility Operating License No. NPF-62 NRC Docket No. 50-461

Subject:

Clinton Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) Follow Up Mission Report This letter provides notification to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that Exelon Generation Company, LLC has no concerns with the NRCs intention to make the Clinton Power Station Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) Follow Up Mission Report dated February 2016, available to the public.

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this report.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Dale Shelton, Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (217) 937-2800.

Respectfully, Theodore A. Stoner Site Vice President Clinton Power Station DRNcas cc:

Regional Administrator NRC Region Ill NRC Senior Resident Inspector Clinton Power Station Office of Nuclear Facility Safety IEMA Division of Nuclear Safety

U-604269

Subject:

Clinton Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) Follow Up Mission Report bcc:

NRC Project Manager, NRR Clinton Power Station Institute of Nuclear Power Operations Manager Licensing, Clinton Power Station (Cantera)

Director Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, West (Cantera)

Exelon Document Control Desk Licensing T. R. Stoner B. T. Kapellas C. D. Dunn S. A. Gackstetter J. E. Cunningham C. J. Propst D. A. Shelton B. E. Brooks R. B. Champley S. Mischke

I Exeton Generation TYPICAL LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENCE CONCURRENCE FORM Station(s): Clinton Power Station Correspondence No.:

U-604269 Subject/Document: Clinton Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) Follow Up Mission Report Document Prepared by:

D. Avery Location:

CPS Extension:

281 5 Required Review and Disciplines Assigned by:

D. Avery

/ Sr. ReQ.Engineer Title Due Date:

Type of Review Required:

Technical Verification Team Review (Reference LS-AA-1 17)

X Individual or Series Review No Technical Review Note:

If the subject document falls within the scope of AD-AA-1 02, Station Qualified Review, one of the reviewers must be a Station Qualified Reviewer.

Disciplines Requited:

Maintenance Radiation Protection Chemistry Training Operations Engineering I&C Radwaste x

Reg Assurance / Licensing Rx Engineering Design Engineering Engr

- Mech Systems Programs Engineering Nuclear Fuels Work Management Engr

- Elect Systems Other: Security Review Concurrence: Signature indicates that the individual has reviewed the subject document and concurs that the content is factual and accurate. Concurrence via e-mail shall be provided using the declaration provided in LS-AA-1 17.

Print Name I Signature Discipline Date Does this letter contain commitments? LI Yes X No If yes, corporate or site commitment coordinator has been notified:

Required Reviews and Signatures (check as appropriate):

LI Station Qualified Review Required:

PORC Approval Required: PORC Meeting No.

LI Corporate Licensing Concurrence Required:

X Site Regulatory Assurance X Station Manager Approval Required:

X Site Vice President Approval Required:

Note: The completed original of this form will be retained by the organization transmitting the submittal (i.e.,

either Licensing or site Regulatory Assurance) in accordance with RM-AA-1O1, Records Management Program.

Date:

Date:

Date:

Date:

Date:./ 1kg Date: -V/2t SRRS 5A.1 13