U-603697, September 2004 Monthly Operating Report for Clinton, Unit 1

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
September 2004 Monthly Operating Report for Clinton, Unit 1
ML042940257
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/11/2004
From: Iliff W
AmerGen Energy Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
U-603697
Download: ML042940257 (2)


Text

Amer~en.

An Exelon Company Clinton Power Station R. R.3, Box 228 Clinton, IL 61727 10CFR50.36 U-603697 October 11, 2004 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. -

ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 Facility Operating License No. NPF-62 NRC Docket No. 50-461

Subject:

September 2004 Monthly Operating Report Please find in the Attachment the Monthly Operating Report for Clinton Power Station, Unit 1, for the period ending September 30, 2004.

Respectfully, W. S. Iliff Regulatory Assurance Manager Clinton Power Station

-- ~- JLP/bIf Attachment cc: Regional Administrator - NRC Region IlIl NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Clinton Power Station Illinois Emergency Management Agency - Division of Nuclear Safety

- f OPERATING DATA REPORT Attachment to U-603697 DOCKET NO. 50-461 UNIT NAME Clinton -1 DATE October 07, 2004 COMPLETED BY P K Ryan TELEPHONE (217) 937-2201 REPORTING PERIOD: September 2004

1. Design Electrical Rating _1,062.00
2. Maximum Dependable Capacity (MWe-Net) 1,022.00 This Month Yr-to-Date Cumulative
3. Number of Hours the Reactor was Critical 720.00 5,926.65 103,345.20
4. Number of Hours Generator On-line 720.00 5,703.61 100,928.34

-5. Reserve Shutdown Hours- - -- - ------ o---

O.00 -- 0.00 -"----4.00 ---

6. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWHrs) 753,763.00 5,677,303.78 90,201,190.48 UNIT SHUTDOWNS Type Method of F: Forced Duration Shutting Cause & Corrective Action No. Date S: Scheduled (Hours) Down 2 Comments

SUMMARY

There were no unit shutdowns or forced losses in the month of September. Planned losses were due to a scheduled downpower to accomplish surveillance testing.

1 Reason: 2 Method:

A Equipment Failure (Explain) 1 Manual B Maintenance or Test 2 Manual Trip/Scram C Refueling 3 Automatic Trip/Scram D Regulatory Restriction 4 Continuation E Operator Training & License Examination 5 Other (Explain)

F Administration G Operational Error (Explain)

H Other (Explain)

Challenges to Main Steam Safety Relief Valves: None I

Page 1 of 1