TXX-6494, Interim Deficiency Rept CP-86-76 Re Configuration & Dimensions of Gould Battery Racks Deviating from Drawing Requirements.Initially Reported on 861021.Evaluation in Final Stage of Review.Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 870810

From kanterella
(Redirected from TXX-6494)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Interim Deficiency Rept CP-86-76 Re Configuration & Dimensions of Gould Battery Racks Deviating from Drawing Requirements.Initially Reported on 861021.Evaluation in Final Stage of Review.Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 870810
ML20215B389
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 06/12/1987
From: Counsil W
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
CP-86-76, TXX-6494, NUDOCS 8706170310
Download: ML20215B389 (1)


Text

Log # TXX-6494 1"l" """--

File # 10110 L

908.3

~

=

=

Ref # 10CFR50.55(e) 1UELECTRIC June 12, 1987 wminm c. coumu E ecutne he Presklent U.~ S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.

20555

SUBJECT:

COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)

DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 DEVIATIONS IN G0ULD BATTERY RACK DIMENSIONS SDAR: CP-86-76 (INTERIM REPORT)

Gentlemen:

On October 21, 1986, we verbally notified your Mr. I. Barnes of a deficiency involving the configuration and dimensions of Gould Battery Racks deviating from drawing requirements.

This is an interim report of a potentially reportable item under the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e).

We have submitted interim reports logged TXX-6110 and TXX-6407, dated November 20, 1986, and April 29, 1987, respectively. On June 5,1987, we also verbally rcquested and received from the NRC an extension until June 12, 1987 to respond to this issue.

Class 1E battery racks for Trains A and B, which were designed and fabricated by Gould, were found to have configurations and dimensions which deviated from the vendor design drawings.

These deviations could result in violation of battery cell spacing requirements for Class IE batteries.

Our review has determined that the conditions are applicable to Units 1 and 2.

Currently our evaluation is in the final stage of review.

We are also evaluating the generic implications of this issue. Our next report will be submitted by August 10, 1987.

Very truly yours, j

. G. Counsil RWH/gj c - Mr. R. D. Martin, Region IV Resident Inspectors, CPSES (3) 9 8706170310 B70612 dcp V

PDR ADOCK 05000445

/

S PDR iO 400 North Ohve Street LB 81 Dallas, Texas 75201