Search results

referring your j April 25, 1981 letter to Mr. Barth for such response l to- the questions posed therein as the NRC staf f may i deem appropriate. l Sincerely

ALAB-355, 4 NRC 397 at 406 footnote 26(1976). For your convenience, I am including a copy of that footnote. Sincerely, 4 Charles A. Barth Counsel for NRC Staff

No. RS-SECY-82-473 Your letters of November 22, 1982 and January 18, 1983 to the General Accounting l Office expressed concern about delays encountered

B. Cummings, Esq. 112 S. Pitt P.O. Box 1177 Alexandria, VA 22313 Pursuant to your request, enclosed are copies of the transcripts of the interviews of

letter which narrates our prior unsuccessful attempts to acquire a copy of this document. With regard to your request for a meeting, I do not believe a meeting

1/24/77 Letter to Shirley from Tanner (1 page) A67.3/1Ti/77 Letter to J. N. Harris, Jr., from J. D. Tanner (1 page) ilth enclosure 3/11/77 Letter to Tanner.from

use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". Category:NRC TO LEGAL/LAW FIRM [Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching

use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". Category:NRC TO LEGAL/LAW FIRM [Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching

use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". Category:NRC TO LEGAL/LAW FIRM [Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching

10, 1985. Your letter emphasizes the need for the NRC to conduct cost-benefit analyses with respect to its criteria in 10 CFR Part 40, Appendix A. These

for the  ; opportunity to present industry views on uranium mill tailings. Your letter discussed two spec'ific matters related to radon risk. We note that

issue, the Staff will be in a position to respond to your discovery requests. The Staff will provide its responses to Dr. Riley by December 29, 1978. You

subject to the stouest are encloaed. Records subl ect to the reavest have besn referred to another federal agencyfiesi for review and direct response to you

the steps that NRC would be taking to respond to Ms. English's petition and emphasized his belief that strong. enforcement action by NRC in this case was

this subject. Enclosed please find a copy of the Secretary's response to the law firm of Shaw, Pittman, Pctts & Trowbridge denying a similar request. Sincerely

the steps that NRC would be taking to respond to Ms. English's petition and emphasized his belief that strong. enforcement action by NRC in this case was

Washington, DC 20036 TO F01A-85-236 This is in further response to your letter dated April 4,1985, in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information

the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit for decision. Therefore, we intend to withhold any action on your request regarding the matter of fees for the withdrawn

subl ect to the request have oeen referred to another Federal agencybes) for review and direct response to you You will be billed by the NRC for fees totaling

obli-gation to speak to outside legal counsel. We would appreciate your directing any further inquiries to NRC employees through the legal offices of this