Semantic search
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Issue date | Title | Topic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ML20209H669 | 12 July 1999 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Elimination of Requirement for Licensees to Update Inservice Insp & Inservice Testing Programs Beyond Baseline Adition & Addenda of ASME BPV Code | Incorporated by reference |
| PLA-4330, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control | 8 June 1995 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control | |
| PLA-4193, Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-9-2 Submitted Ocre Requesting That NRC Revise Regulations to Provide Public Access to Info Held by Licensees But Not Submitted to Nrc.Urges NRC to Deny Ocre Petition in Entirety | 31 August 1994 | Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-9-2 Submitted Ocre Requesting That NRC Revise Regulations to Provide Public Access to Info Held by Licensees But Not Submitted to Nrc.Urges NRC to Deny Ocre Petition in Entirety | |
| ML20046A953 | 20 July 1993 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Opposes Rule | |
| ML20045D746 | 21 June 1993 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Disagrees W/Maintaining 100% Rate for Contractor & Vendor Employees | Fitness for Duty |
| ML20045F797 | 21 June 1993 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Supports Rule in Part & Opposes Rule in Part | Fitness for Duty |
| ML20044F836 | 24 May 1993 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. Opposes Rules | |
| ML20044F751 | 24 May 1993 | Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. | |
| PLA-3744, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 52 Re Training & Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant.Expresses Concerns of Potential for Inconsistent & Inappropriate Application by Individual NRC Inspectors & Examiners | 9 March 1992 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 52 Re Training & Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant.Expresses Concerns of Potential for Inconsistent & Inappropriate Application by Individual NRC Inspectors & Examiners | |
| PLA-3568, Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986 -1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a | 8 April 1991 | Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986 -1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a | |
| PLA-3462, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Proposed Rule,W/Enhancements Recommended by Numarc,Will Provide More Stable Basis for Util Planning & Development of Future Power Plants | 15 October 1990 | Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Proposed Rule,W/Enhancements Recommended by Numarc,Will Provide More Stable Basis for Util Planning & Development of Future Power Plants | License Renewal |
| ML19332G526 | 6 December 1989 | Comments on Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Industry Has Made Substantial Progress Re Maint Performance as Indicated by Respective Performance Indicators,Commission Insps & Plant Conditions | |
| PLA-3175, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants | 29 March 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants | Generic Fundamentals Examination |
| ML20235V400 | 2 March 1989 | Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Program at Nuclear Plants.Proposed Maint Rule Has Potential to Significantly Undermine Util Initiatives & Direct Limited Resources Away from Real Improvements in Maint | |
| PLA-3157, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule Not Needed & Will Not Serve to Increase Commission Ability to Ensure Nuclear Plants Reliably Maintained | 24 February 1989 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule Not Needed & Will Not Serve to Increase Commission Ability to Ensure Nuclear Plants Reliably Maintained | Backfit |
| PLA-3118, Comment Endorsing NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Rule | 17 November 1988 | Comment Endorsing NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Rule | Fitness for Duty |
| PLA-3019, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Nrc Does Not Fully Appreciate Impact of Rule as Written.Encourages Commission to Abandon Rulemaking | 15 April 1988 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Nrc Does Not Fully Appreciate Impact of Rule as Written.Encourages Commission to Abandon Rulemaking | |
| PLA-2726, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Rulemaking to Enhance Levels of Engineering & Accident Mgt Expertise on Shift | 25 September 1986 | Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Rulemaking to Enhance Levels of Engineering & Accident Mgt Expertise on Shift |