ST-HL-AE-3149, Forwards Annotated Revs to FSAR Section 17.2 & Organizational Changes

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Annotated Revs to FSAR Section 17.2 & Organizational Changes
ML20245K206
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  
Issue date: 06/28/1989
From: Mcburnett M
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
ST-HL-AE-3149, NUDOCS 8907050053
Download: ML20245K206 (36)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:4 The Light company rject ectr c enendng Mation E O. Box 2 Wadsworth, Texas 77W ut exa8 Houston Lighting & Power._ June 28, 1989 ST-HL AE-3149 File No.: G09.02 10CFR50.54 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. STN 50-498, STN 50-499 H!.&P Organizational Channas

References:

1. ST-HL-AE-3119 dated May 26, 1989 2. ST-HL-AE-3030 dated March 28, 1989 3. 'ST-HL-AE-2876 dated December 7, 1988 Pursuant to 10CFR50.54(a)(3), Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P) provides notification of changes in the South Texas Project Electric 4 Generating Station Quality \\ssurance program as described in FSAR Section 17.2. HL&P has elected Mr. R. W. Chewning as Vice President, Nuclear Assurance. Also, the Nuclear Security De.partment has been appropriately shown under Nuclear Operations The changes do not reduce the effectiveness of the Quality Assurance program previously described in the FSAR. Changes to FSAR Section 17.2 submitted by references 1, 2, and 3 are included for continuity. The attached pages will be incorporated in the FSAR update. If you should have any questions on this matter, please contact Mr. A. W. Harrison at (512) 972-7298. 6 M. A. McBurnett

Manager, Support Licensing MAM/ RAH /ss : Annotated revisions to FSAR Section 17.2 1

99 \\ e907c00$3 A subsidiary or nouston industries incorporated gg 906 PDR ADOCK 05000498 U

c o Houston Lighting & Power Company ST-HL-AE-3149 South Texas Project Electric Generating Station File No.:.G09.02 10CFR50.54 Page 2 cc: Regional Administrator, Reg; ion IV Rufus S. Scott Nuclear Regulatory Commission Associate General Counsel 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite'1000 Houston Lighting & Power Company Arlington, TX 76011 P. O. Box 1700 Houston, TX 77001 George Dick, Project Manager j U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission INPO Washington, DC 20555 Records Center l 1100 Circle 75 Parkway Jack E. Ecss Atlanta, GA. 30339-3064 Senior Resident Inspector-Unit 1 c/o U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Dr. Joseph M. Hendrie P. O. Box 910 50 Be11 port Lane Bay City, TX 77414 Be11 port, NY 11713 J. I. Tapia Senior Resident Inspector-Unit 2 c/o U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 910 Bay City, TX 77414 J. R. Newman, Esquire Newman & Holtzinger, P. C. 1615 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036 R. L. Range /R. P. Verret Central Power & Light Company P. O. Box 2121 Corpus Chri.*i, TX 78403 R. John Miner (2 copies) Chief Operating Officer City of Austin Electric Utility 721 Barton Springs Road Austin, TX 78704 5 l R. J. Costello/M. T, Hardt City Public Service Board P. O. Box 1771 4 San Antonio. TX 78296 Revised 12/21/88 NL-DISR4

4-c.o. 7 F i ATTACHMENT I Annotated Revisions to FSAR Section 17.2 i S3/LIC10/89173001 ___________.___m.___

= * ' C STP,5*r sq. es n - s FSAR ~ . c b #" ' 4 ATTACHMENT 1 ST-HL-AE-2f fl n g,l p... v :..

u.,.....

7ABl.E OF CONTENTS - ' PAGE 1 . OF.33 CHAPTER 17 l QUA1,1T[ ASSURANCE Section Title h (Seetto,n,k7.1 Table of Contents Deleted), l 17.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING THE OPERATIONS ' PHASE .s 17.2-1 t 17.2.1 Organization 17.2 1 17.2.1.1 Authorities and Duties 17.2 1 17.2.1.1.1 Nuclear Croup 17.2 1 -17.2.1.1.2 Nuclear Assurance (NA) Department 17.2 1 17.2.1.1.3 Nuclear Renteperations Department

  • 17.2 3 17.2.1.1.4 Noelear Engineering and Construction Departnent 17.2-3 17.2,1 1 Q Peclacing-end-Services-Deparw 17.2 4 17.2.1.1.6' G**urity-Division h'a, k ;-ify 17.2 4 I

H.:.1.1.7 e ;1+yw*dw1.h 17.2 4 17.2.1.2 Establishing Policies and Coals 17.2 4 17.2.1.3 organizational Independence 17.2 5 17.2.1.4 Delegation of QA Tmtions 17.2 6 17.2.2 Quality Assurane; Fr.n.rar 17.2,6 ', {2,- 17.2.2.2 Identification of Safety Related Items and 17.2.2.1 QA Program 17.2 6 Services 17.2 6. I 17.2.2.3 Development of the QA Program 17.2-7 17.2.2.4 QA Program Documents 17.2-7 17.2.2.5 Policies and coals 17.2 7 7 17.2.2.6 Personnel Indoctrination and Training 17.2 7 17.2.2.7 Control of Activities 17.2-8 a 17.2.2.8 Management Review 17.2 8 4 t M =2 Fysw.ms venover-17.2 9 17.2.2.% 1 FSAR Changes 17.2 9 .o 17.2.2.RfC Computer Code Programs 17.2 9 .h 17.2.3 Design Control 17.2 9 1 17.2.3.1 Design Control Measures 17.2 9 Q. 17.2.3.2 Appifcation Review 17.2 9 e 17.2.3.3 Design Process 17.2-10 }* 17.2.3.4 Design Review and Verification 17.2 10 17.2.3.3 Design Interfaces 17.2.3.6 Design Changes 17.2 11 17.2-11 l l 17.2.4 Procurement Document control 17.2 11 17.2.4.1 Procurement Document Content 17.2-11 17.2.4.2 Procurement Document Preparation and Reviev' 17.2-12 a 17.2.4.3 Supplier Selection 17.2 13 17.2.5 Instruction, Procedures, and Drawings 17.2 14 l' 17.2.5.1 Scope 17.2-14 17.2.5.2 Acceptance criteria 17.2 14 Document Control 17.2 14 17.2.6 I J't. : D. ? TC IN1 Amendment 6i 4 * *. en e .e .e e,. es-a= com4.a. w ee as wee. aseem .a.. a .=,a

4 -sTP FSAR ATTACHMENT 1 1 ST-HL-AE-3WI PAGE 3 . 0F 33 TABLE' OF CONTENTS (Continued) CHAPTER 17 6,p49 A' ./ 6 g, c QUALITY ASSURANCE STA Soetion Title g 17.2.6.1 Scope Documents 17.2 14 1 17.2.6.2 Control of Issuance and Revision 17.2 14 17.2 6.3 Croups Responsible for Review and Approval 17.2 16 17.2.7 Control of Purchased Material, Equipment, and se rvices 17.2 16 ~17.2.7.1 Scope 17.2 16 ,17.2.7.1.1 Source Evaluation and Selection 17.2 17 17.2.7el.2 Monitoring of Suppliers 17.2 18 17.2.7.1.3 Receiving Inspection 17.2 18 17.2.7.1.4 Acceptance of Procured Items and Service 17.2 19 17.2.7.1.5 Vendor Surve111ance 17.2 20* 17.2.7.2 Audits of Suppliers 17.2 20 17.2.8 Identification and Control of Materials, Parts and Components 17.2 20 17.2.8.1 Identification Requirements 17.2 20 17.2.8.2 Maintenance of Identification 17.2 20 17.2.9 control of Special Processes 17.2-20 17.2 9.1 Special Processes. 17.2 20 17.2.9.'2 Special Process Qualification 17.2 21 17.2.9.3 Control of Outside Contractors 17.2-21 17.2.9.4 Records Control 17.2-21 17.2.9.5 Qualification of NDT, Personnel 17.2-21 J 17.2.10 Inspection (- 17.2-21 17.2.10.1' Inspection Program 17.2 21-17.2.10.1.1 Qualification of Inspectors 17.2 21 17.2.10.1.2 Inspection Process 17.2 22 -17.2.10.1.3 Process Monitoring 17.2 22 17.2.10.1.4 Supporting Inspections 17.2 23 17.2.10.2 Mandatory Inspections 17.2 23 17.2.10.3 Acceptance 17.2 23 17.2.11 Test control 17.2 23 17.2.11.1 Test Program 17.2 23 17.2.11.1.1 Scope 17.2 23 17.2.11.1.2 Personnel Qualifications 17.2 23 17.2.11.1.3 Preoperational and Sf ard up, Tests 17.2 24 l 17.2.11.2 Test Procedures 17.2 24 I 17.2.11.3-Data Recording, Evaluation, and Retention 17.2 24 17.2.12 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment 17.2-24 17.2.12.1 Calibration Program 17.2 24 17.2.12.2 Records 17.2-26 17.2.13 Handling, Storage, and Shipping 17.2 26 17.2.13.1 Special Procedures 17.2 26 17.2.13.2 Inspection 17.2-26 17.2.13.3 Procurement Controls 17.2 26 17.2.13.4 Storage Surveillance 17.2 26 17.2.13.5 Records 17.2 27 .. ' ') TC 17 2 Amendment 58 /

ATTACHMENT 4 ST-HL-AE stycy STP FSAR PAGE. J OF 33 LIST OF FJCURES. CHAPTER 17 Reference Figure Number ' Number. 71 tie _ (17.1 List of Figures Deleted) aaali Cr9an t valisn l Wele%er Assurance D: pert :r.: 17.2-1 17.2 2 44L&PApor4&e-Cr$2r,!::t ier-M u ett u Sr.ar G A Fu rfi.a r 17.2-3 QA Program Documents 17.2 4 Hl.6P Organization (Deleted) i 1 ( l l (_. TC 17 5 Amendment 54

ATTACHMENTS STP PSAR ST-HL-AE-3N 9 L fAGE 1__0F 33 w 17.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING THE OPERATIONS PHASE 1 Houston Lighting 6 Power Company (HIAP), as a licensee and as Project Manager for itself and the other owners, has the Quality Assurance (QA) responsibility 'l for design, engineering, procurement, fabrication, construction, maintenance, repair, inservice inspection, refueling, modifications, testing, and operation I of the South Texas Project Electric Cenerating Station (STPECS). I H1AP's Nuclear Quality Assurance Program requires that H1AP, its prime con-tractors, subcontractors, and vendors comply with the criteria established by 10CTR Part 50, Section 50.55a; 10CFR Part 50 Appendix A, General Design Cri-terion 1; and 10CFR Par go,AppendixB. It is the i tj,r3 gl,7 tandardsy1AP to comply, as defined herein, wit MIN'MA epplicable ald),hWr , ANSI N18.7. and implementing Regulatory Guides as defined erein and FSAR Table 3.12-1. The H14P QA Program is defined by the Operations QA Plan. The Operations QA Plan is further augmented by implementing procedures to provide H1AP vith the assurance that its quality commitments are net. Ae-QA-prg re: den rtbed by the-Pr+3cet-qbPlanJor -de r f gn-end - e enctreethe-eettvi+b vill te inplersed.I entil theco-act1"1ti+? r* c e~ pie te-or-cho4 pere t-kes-QA-6g 13 effee dye. -1 p 4 q--the qm lity of dere a-tiu!!!en 17.2.1 Organization 17.2.1.1 Authorities and Duties. 17.2.1.1.1 Nuclear Group: The Nuclear Croup is comprised of Nuclear' -Phae Operations, Nuclear Engineering and Construction, Nuclear Assurance, and the F*1+er4af4ty4evlw !=rd-Croup Vice President, Nuclear. 3 The heads of these groups report to the I g gjggg .f, Croup Vice President. Nuclear The Crcup Vice President, Nuclear, has overall responsibility for power plant quality assurance, engineering, construction, and operations activities as they reiste to STPECS. 7y 17.2.1.1.2 Nuclear Assurance (NA) Department: he-of-ganke t4en-primarily-reponsibi-e-for-establishing and ex+euting-the-HIAP-QA-Prograr-j } vhich-includes-Qbfor-fira-prot 4ction -is41AP-QAv r %e-QA-o r ga n t e a t4-on-du ri ng-oper4 cl on-i s-shovn-i n41 gur a-17v24r--The-s i t e-of- -the-QA-o rgani e at iony-including-the-i nopection-+t* f f i-45-ba s ed-on-the-enti6 -pa t e d -QA/QC-i nvolveme nt-.in.-oper atJon--and-cai ntena nc o-act iv i t-le s-a nd-by-a-$ ur- .vay-of-41-ts-QA-staffs-of-other utilities with-nucleax_ power-plants-in-opera-t ien. Ceneral Manager, Nuclear Assurance The Ceneral Manager, NA, is responsible for the development of the QA Progran. The General Manager, NA, has the authority to identify, initiate, recommend, or provide solutions to quality related problems and verify the implementation and effectiveness of the solutions. This position has the independence to conduct QA/QC activities without undue pressure of cost or schedule. The ~ 17.2-1 Amendment 62 )

f +, 3 l l l l ATTACHMENT 1 l l j ST-HL-AE-3149 PAGE 5 0F 33 j T) -JA, f,,,J,. J ~,ao m. 3. xd4 ,*n ? O/N sund L ' uh).); 51, L1 /'dL & EiQAA ml 'C,l [ f) JL Q A Ja M. !A$h cma -u$' L'L A~n ,LJ .2d ~ I !+ 1 O, wlua._12w,, N s ljt YA uhAabi 14 o % 'hmuk6 , Aux 1, ~,, bw h o L IA,1,;[7'&agy ~ ~ yu/ r" 6A s ,L u LL JNAL A.yn i i I \\ O /- ipe~t~ 7e d d Q u A A h ' - p mL-fia_g,wf. fi~ P L & _q mm r - f k, + < ~,o d' an a - ~, J, Y Q i

  • di 9 AAlu_, ps d lhc-cn d,,, h,', fl}

Mo" i & d b zle W y 4 l

cL44_W,

_-----____-J

^ W ' / ATTACHMENT.1 - ST-HL-AE-3 49 PAGE b-0F 33 STP FSAR = ceneral fianager, NA, has the authority to 'stop'vork' ~ for cause in d engineering, design, procurement, fabrication, modification, preoperational pS testing,'. and operations phases of the nuclear plant, y. ooW eneral Manager, WA, reports to the 9revy Vice President,[NuclearI,T d.: hn The were!! r..pann th!!!y far @e14ty *.::ur:r.a et ;772C3. The position of Ceneral Man. gor, MA, is on the same or higher organtastion level as the. highest line manager responsible fi r performing activities affecting quality cs:shown in Figure 17.2 2. =;:, ., rehr ='.pp;m.. ;.1. 0,::: m = q:. 71 i.,,,c,4 .l ',b n.en therato. Final approval da ;- ' ' ' '- C N L 7... g r,;, 'N & en 17.2.1.1.3 Noelear Pfent Operations Department: The Nuclear Mene- . Operations Department is responsible for all aspects of the nuclear plant = post. fuel load testing, operation, and maintenance, Vice President. Nuclear D4 esse Operations Tho' vice President, Nuclear Jtleet operations is responsible for staffing $7PECS with qualified personnel and acquiring and coordinating the assistance of internal and external organf rations for the testing, startup, operation, and maintenance of $7PECS. The Vice President, Noelear eP14*e Operations reports to. the Croup Vice Presi-dent, Nuclear. Plant Manager The Plant Manager has prise. responsibility for the safe operation of the $7PECS. The plant staff, under the direction of the Plant Manager, develops ]a detailed procedures and instructions for testing, operation, and maintenance, and radiological monitoring of the STPECS. N In addition, disputes over corrective action taken in response to conditions %: adverse to quality are normally resolved by the Plant Manager. Should this j resolution not be satisfactory, the disputing parties'nay take the satter to higher management for resolution. p 'I Tha Plant Manager reports to the Vice President, Nuclear IL&ent Operations. H i t-kwetear The engineering ,4.,1,., l Engineering and Construction Department: - g 17.2.1.1.4 a ( and Construction Department is responsible for the design engineering, design .y e ont r o1. e ons t rue t t on, pre r4 qui a44+-t+o4 Lag r_praopar4t tona1--t eet tog,y: :: := canagemenh and nuclear fuel management. q g.< fe g _4 e. Vice President, Engineering and Co'nstruction y p.dta r y c The vice President,p ngineering and Construction is responsible for design t t.p engineering, construction, modification, satep 1 control, and design reviews ,g for $7PECS. In addition, the Vice President,4 neering and Construction is {Qr geble for elant licenst ~ activities, nue ear fuel design, fuel q acquisition, and fuel management nd-for previdfeg-* rmth-wenegement 5*rvec's h.* pvidos b,r procurement od s& age of equipent,mterial snd systsee 0 4 . Y s.TPEGS, 17.2 2 Amendment 62 v.-- __-.._.-.a.___

ATTACHMENT 1 ST-HL-AE-3149 33 i "E " PAGE 7 0F t 4L cA msi d 'n J,,,D a _,,6 l --]&pW d 3;~;,5 /z,l 5: b/u 5 1 J Ja an ~, 4,w. 21L n Ass , au / $ Au d mand L L A ~ n awa k sad p L n I:n k L L Le-J k:x a u-)G A d d b i J & ' & f >&> nik 'EALu] pn,,a 1 i i 0 .I l ~ t 4 l '==-d-e

        • W^****-*

hese--e e_gspus.,w,

  1. NM-'

r %eseW ++eah5 = ,,g,,,,,,,p.

8# ATTACHMENT 1 ST-HL-AE-38 49 PAGE 9 0F 33 ) 9 1 p,c,, _ u - l> u >, ib, uD & A > ~s w ~ L 2 9, ' L Y d ' d A'D - %2 oJLL s -ik' n

ty C

. -Wu! -A

J2wu, E/d !nL d'<A

&dsiX uKLLLD 1,L!uh>_ ' ' J JA }Li 1Mi_ $ d & l ' M / h A w d u x /u ug o2a - j m %opue a n ux1 Ap e_n . fad, A A _2l A ~',L, m i 1 ! l t \\t> ki

jilo m.

+p ll 1 --__._-_-------____--h-_-_a

s7P rsAn ATIACHMENT1 1 ST-H L-AE-3@ een...; '...u.r.~0;r 0,;r.: nna _,d._. PAGE c1 0F 33 na 0:rarel-N+ nog +e 4TP-O erett::: ftpp rt, h re:p:n ith hr O r P gte.r4@4e+ wing, enf een:tewetten ;uppri of ti,e Ovvil, ter.. Tay j.d

  • r -
    p ; r _t h;;.

n: Cen:re! Men:ger, STP ^;:::thn: In;6::r4ng :nf fen:treeth;, 0 pp;rt, r; pert; ;; d,e vic,ra,,14,g, %n;;;!," nn;r, Ta na 0:ncr:1 M:neg:r, STP, h ::: :::151: ft: ::::d!nct!n

netruethe, end ned!f!::the :;:5, en! 1::!g. rr:Sv;g f::!;n :ngh::rh,

4 Pre', :: "nh L Sr

=L ;;nu i

5.: r2 7:1 ":n:g r, CTP,

p;rt: ::

Cene;a.n';;. th: '.'k; Tre ;i d;;;, - Enghae r ir,,, ..,0 4 ,mu.-- i m.. ~ - { ,m um..~um..,_ a e reh: teg-M Jetertal: Msnagere.t ?:per* nt pre"!!:: f:: the p :::::::n: .........,.s mn

n f :* e :4ge_4(- *g4 pr e n t, :: t e :441 - e nd ::.wS :

t f: !!PE%. Manager, Nuclear Purchasing and Materials Management ne Manager, Nuclear Purchasing and Materials Management is responsible for '\\ the procurement of equipment, material, and services including the coordination of procurement document review, otorage of equipment and materials at STPECS.% receipt, handling, and. j de.F n e Manager e, +- President *Ngineering and Construction. fx pron'nt dkecti*o c Preside.bw-126-Nucle *r-Secur4tw-Nue4 ear S? chasing M % ?"t Mc's he .Mrk We ecHon. et Vice f l 66g,,,,, development-and--coor4ination-of-s4 cur 4ty-pract4<+s-and-pr+ - eewrity-is-responsible hr tier b es t ebl4+hmeet-a nd-m44 nt+na nce--+f-phys 4 ca l-secu r4ty-e t-STPMS. Monater-o f-Nue4 +4 r-S++ur4 ty-ne-Ma na ge r-o f-Wuc444 r-Se cu r44y-14-re s pons 4 b l +-f+r-the-deve4 +poen t-of-the-the-$ f ee-Acces s-Aut ho r4 a ati on-F44gm.e +curity-prog ram,-fo r-pr4v4 ding no-Manager-+f-Nuelear-S+ cur 4ty-reports-40-the-Vice-Fr+st4entdueleer "hn Operations. .p i. !J p on-Reseirees -Weleer:-ihmand e s c se t ; - :R h e r m. m.m Mt.&P-+.p l +yee s -{n-eenj u net ( +n -vu h-t he-6 it e-Ace e s s -Authori e eti on-Program hx r, lLen4escsces-Nue4esr-Ele-U84 aa p i, Uuas.nu $wavuass. G ww1cea is arapuus1DIT-fva Acetsa-Autherf eetion-Prottom-in-4he-sertenins-*f-HL&P-+erleye::, g Cut 31Ls ' muyyva t o 71.. Ho n.g a, Hua.u $rsvuau. 4 acie-( sspviis-tv it.i Vice Psisie nt,lLon.ie leforset4+ndesourcen 17.2.1.2 Establishing Policies and Coals. H1AP are defined in the Operations QA Plan. QA policies and goals for The Croup Vice President, 17.2-3 Asendaent 62

i ATTACHMENT 1 j ST-HL-AE-3tM 4 PAGE - to 0F 33 INSERT A 17.2.1.1.5 Administrative Support Department The Administrative Support Department is responsible for records management and administrative services. In addition, the matrixed Human Resources Nuclear Group receive functional direction from the General Manager, Administrative Support. General Manager, Administrative Support The General Manager, Administrative Support is responsible for providing a records management system and for support of the Site Access Authorization Program. The General Manager, Administrative Support reports to the Group Vice President, Nuclear. Mat.ager of Information Management The Manager of Information Management is responsible for providing a records management system including processing, storage, preservation and retrievability. The Manager of Information Management reports to the General Manager, Administrative Support. Manager, Human Resources, Nuclear The Manager, Human Resources, Nuclear 'is responsible for supporting the Site Access Authorization Program in the screening of H14P employees. The Manager, Human Resources, Nuclear reports to the General Manager, Administrative Support for project direction and the Vice President Human Resources for administrative direction.

STP PSAk ATTACHMENT.2. ST-HL-AE-3M PAGE Ji '0F M 17.2.2.3 Dgv.lepunt ef the QA Pretras. Th9 Operatiens QA Ffegram shall be fully implemented 90 days prior to initial fuel loading. The QA / Program shall be implemented throughout the operating life of the STPECS. Ac4Md :,, p r iar-a 24L Q?. hege- !:pla e,,t t4er., ch:1b h ::.tr:1h d 5 r m r+ 4 1 L be_ m iet d,_: m : d, M : 7, m :1g g _u.- m-

w r M e e " i + h et!:r.: 17.2.5

.-.f 17.2 3. 17.2.2.4 QA Program Documents. The QA Program shall be imp 1.emented with plans, procedures, and instructions to er.s'ure effective control of all

quality activities. The relationship of various manuals L shown on Figure 17'2 3.

Figure 17.2 3 lists the typical procedures that will be developed to implement - tho QA Program. Provisions for deletions, additions, and minor program changes do not permit including a complete listing of procedures. 17.2.2.5 Policies and Coals. It is the policy of HIAP, acting as s licensee and Project Manager for the other owners of the South Texas Project Electric Cenerating S'stion (STPECS), to assure that the' design, procurement, wh(im, testing, and operation of the STPECS are in conformance with ' specifications, procedures, codes, and NRC regulations. It is the responsi-bility of each organization supporting the STPEGS to ensure that the require-sants stated.in this quality usurance program cre incorporated into proce-ilures Adherence to thoca procedures is mandatory for all H14P organizations and for all contractors or vendors providing items or services covered by the QA program. Tha Operations QA Plan identifies activities and establishes requirements for ) precedures which identify, initiate, and verify the resolution of sofoty-related quality problems. The imp 2ementing procedures call for the resolution of quality problems at the lowest possible authorized level. Itowever, if a dispute 'is encountered in the resolution of a quality problem which cannot b resc1ved at lover levels, the 4enerrl-Meager, Nuclear l AP wrance, presents the prob 1cm to the Croup Vice resident Nuclear, for re atution. We t%sMmQ 17.2.2.6 Personne1: Indoctrination and Training. Ceneral indoctrination cod training programs shall be provided for the general office and plant site personnel to assure that they are knowledgeable regarding quality programs and requirements. The requirements for training H1AP personnel are described in Ssetion 13.2. The training of plant operating personnel is the responsibility of the Nuclear Training Departaent. Records of training shall be maintained to demonstrate compliance with the gurlification requirements. Personnel perforaing complex, unusual, or potentially hazardous work shall be instructed in special indoctrination or briefing sessions. Enphasis shall be on special requirements for safety of personnel, radiation control and protection, unique footures of equipment and systems, operating constraints, and control requirements in effect during performance of work. Vhere required by codes and standards, personnel are trained, qualified, and certified according to written proc (dures in the principles and techniques of performing specific octivities described in. sections 17.2.9, 17.2.10, 17.2.11 and 17.2.18. Personnel performing surveillance ter ting activities shall be similarly troined in ac,cordance with written procedures. d 17.2 5 Amendment 62 ~ _.__2___._.___.___

(: STP TSAR ATTACHMENT A ST-HL-AE-3N'l d PAGE.A _0F M .N,chj#p.p ) U.0.2.3 Ott arLxnr c = i n;"dvu --cii vim 4;; 6 w..Lv11ed-L ty 9: !TL3.qh avges:95e+w4ptie-Me Cen:tru+t4a. ha;;r ha4en M j-es,4 gr ed.-the -rvrpons w ilityder dewitpics p rec c a re sder-ths c e ntgo+m.- f I wnauer,---Theo+-pa+adur4s,- tb P!AS Stanup %neel, ~* 4 m ,yctee gitu 7.-Plefr shrthenevi ryst+a-selvast-f+Meety-t *;;;2t ;I wi>=in*et4en h .aa.a4witin.nd wrnever-ef -plehy. stars far ^P r e + " ^~ e 17.2.2. FSAR Changes. H14P is committed to maintaining the FSAR as cn offective and meaningful document to provide programmatic direction on $7PgCS. Changes to the QA program, as described in the FSAR, will be pro. cessed in accordance with 10CFR50.54(a). A FEA4- ' When changes are madek,,ll be made ~ to the NRC within 30 days of implementation. to the organizational elements only Q i 73an, appro-priota notification wi 10 17.2.2.M, Computer Code Programs. The development, control, and use of co:puter code programs which affect,afety-related items will be controlled in cecordance with the Operations QA Plan. Prior to use of a computer ct>de pro-gram in a safety related activity, the appropriateness of the program to the cetivity shall be veriffed. In addition, all such programs shall be appro-priotely certified for use. 17.2.3 Design control 'N 17.2.3.1 Design Control Measures. Procedures shall be established to centrol the preparation and teview of design documents. These procedures aholl ensure that design ictivities provide the correct translatir.n of regula-tary requirements and design bases into specifications, drawings, written procedures, instructions, and other design documents.

,)

Dasign requirements and changes thereto shall be identified, documented, re-viewed, and approved to assure incorporation of appropriate quality standards 1 in design documents. Design requirements and quality standards shall be de-scribed to an appropriate levs1 of detail in design documents. Any exceptions to quality standards will be documented. Design docurnents for modification to structures, systems, and components shall include the design bases described in the FSAR. QA shall identify in procedures those design documents which vill require an inline QA review. This review is for seismic and quality group classification, selection of quality standards, and any deviation from quality standards. Othor design documer.ts vill be reviewed during audits and surveillance to ossure docwtents are prepared, reviewed, and approved in accordance with procedures and tha:. adequate acceptance criteria for inspection and tests are included. 17.2.3.2 Application Review. A review for application suitability of noterials, parts, equipment, and processes that are essential to the functions of safety related structures, systems, and components is done as part of the design document preparation and review process. The procedures which govern the preparation and review of design documents require the use of valid industry standards and specifications in the application suitability review. R3 view of standard "off the shelf" commercial matarials, parts, and equipment for suitability of application with safety-related structures, systems, and components vill be conducted prior to selection. ./- Amendment 62 17.2-8 l

l ATTACHMENT 2 STP rsAR ST-HL-AE-31 P1 gi tlo g#f' PAGE _G_0F 33 17.2.3.3 Design Process. Design activities involving reactor physics; N stress, thermal, hydraulic, and accident analysis; materials compatibility; ( and accessibility for maintenance, inservice inspection, and repair will be performed according to approved procedures by appropriately qualified individu-als. Results of analyses vill be appropriately verified and documented. Delineation of acceptance criteria for inspections and tests will be specified i by procedure. All such acceptance criteria will satisfy the requirements of applicable staniards or be approved by appropriately qualified individuals, 17.2.3.4 Design Review and Verification. The design process shall include design verification by qualified persons to assure that the desi n is6 adequate and meets specified design input. Design control procedures shall avecify requirements for the selection and performance of design verification. sesign verification shall be either by design review, alternate calculation, qualification testing, or by a combination of these. The depth of design verification shall be commensurate with the importance of the system or compo-nent to plant safety, complexity of the design, and similarity of design to previous designs. Ifhrification method 4s performedfonly through qualification testing, the following requirements shall be met: Procedures shall provide criteria that specify when verification should 1.. be by test. 2. Prototype, component, or feature testing shall be performed as early as possible prior to installation of plant equipment, or prior to the point when the installation vould become irreversible. 3. Verification by test shall be performed under conditions that simulate the most adverse design conditions as determined by analysis. Procedures shall identify the responsibilities of the verifier, the features to be verified, and the documentation required. Design verification shall be performed by qualified verifiers who are not directly responsible for the design or the design changes. However, in unusual cases the designer's supuvisor may perform the verification if the supervisor is the only techni-cally qualified individual and the need for the supervisor to perform the review is approved and documented in advance by the supervisor's management. Design verification will normally be performed prior to release for procure-ment, manufacture, installation, or use by anothr; organization in other de-sign activities. Exceptions shall be justified and documented. Procedures shall control the justification of exceptions s.nd the completion of the veri. fication of all affectd design output documents prior to relying on the com-ponent, system, or structure to perform its function. Design analyses shall be sufficiently detailed as to purpose, method, assump-tions, design requ',rements, references, and units to permit an independent review by a technically qualified person. Computer codes shall be verified to be certified for use, and it shall be verified that their intended purpose is specified. 17.2-9 Amendment 62

~ - - -~----------q ATTACHMENU. f. ST-HL-AE-3lt PAGE.3 ' h j] STP FSAR 0Fz33 I g, c4a Y tlM re 5. Requirements for extending applicable HMP procurement requirements to lower. tier suppliers and subcontractors, including HMP's access to -) facilities and records. 6. Requirements for supplier reporting to H14P nonconformances.let procure. -ment document requirements and conditions for their disposition. 7. Requirements for=the retention, control, and maintenance of supplier QA [ records. Supplier-furnished records shall include: sj Documentation that identifies the purchased ites and the specific a. . procurement requirements (e.g., codes, standards, and specifica-tions) met _by the item. ] b. Documentation identifying any procurement requirements that have l not been met. ' A description of those nonconformances from 44e procurement re. c. quirements,dispositioned " accept as is" or " repair." 3. ' Requirement' for the supplier to submit a copy of its QA program descrip-tion. 9. R w irements for the. performance of maintenance receipt inspection checks where applicable. 10 ; Applicability of 10CFT21. Reporting Requirements. j Review of Purchasing' documents by QA' personnel shall_ verify that quality requirements are correctly. stated, verifiable, and controllable; that acceptance / rejection criteria are included; and that the documents have been prepared, reviewed, and approved in accordance with HIM's QA program require. ments.- 17.2.4.2 Procurement Document Preparation and Review. Responsibility for procurement is a joint effort of all the departments within the-Nuclear Croup. The department requesting the quality-related jaa eri or m escurtel provides technical content. QA reviews the request f6r"q6 i y requirements and the !fuelear Yurchasing and Materials Management Department is respon(ible for commercial provisions. The sequence of preparation, review, approval, and issuance of procurement documents is generally as follows: 1. Purchase Requisitions Purchase Requ b itio forms shall be used to initiate the procurement of safety related materials, parts, components and services. Procurement may be initiated by any Nuclear Croup Bepartm e persorael. Purchase Requisitions shall include material and com> -..<nt identifica-tion requirements, drawings, specifications, inspection and test require-l ments, and special process instructions as appropriate. Commercial items shall rely on proven design and utilize verification methods by the purchaser in lieu of supplier controls. 17.2-11 Amendment 62 E_ .i

77ECf1 MENT 1 ST-HL-AE-3M STP PSAR PAGE.E 0F _g --- tJo cAoY 3149 Purchase Requisitions for safety related materials, parts, components, sf 4 or services shall be reviewed by the cognizant technical organization j and QA personnel to verify that adequate technical and quality require-ments, respectively, have been specified. The reviews for technical and quality requirements shall to performed by someone other than the origin. ator of the requisition. 2. Purchase Orders and Contracts Purchase Orders and Contracts are prepared and issued by the huelear Purchasing and Materials Mana6ement Department, and establish for the suppliers the technical and quality requirements which must be met. l These documents also establish the comercial conditions for the procurement action. Purchase Orders and Contracts shall accurately reflect the technical and quality requirements established by the Purchase Requisition. If dpring j the bid negotiations with the supplierj it becomes necessary or comer-cially desirable to change the technical or quality requirements, such changes shall be presented to the cognizant organization which approved the original requirements for approval. 3. Change Controls . Additions, modifications, exceptions, and other changes to procurement document quality and technical requirements shall require a review and approval equivalent to that of the original document. Commercial con-sideration changes may not require review and concurrence by the origi-nator. j 17.2.4.3 Supplier Selection. Suppliers of safety-related items or services shall be required to submit copies of their QA program description, os required by procurement documents defined in Section 17.2.4.1, with their bids. The supplier's QA program description shall be evaluated prior to the issuance of a purchase order or execution of a contract and acceptability shell be documented. The process by which suppliers are judged a capable procurement source is described in Section 17.2.7. Procurement documents covering safety-related spare or replacement parts shall impose standards consistent with those specified for the original equipment or by a properly reviewed and approved revision. The procurement of spare parts or replacement parts will be subject to the QA program controls in effect at the time of the procurement. 17.2.5 I g r gu_n g PrSteegu4e g n4 D aw(n4s 4 17.2.5.1 Scope. The quality-related activities associated with the operations phase shall be accomplished in accordance with documented instruc-tions, procedures, and/or drawings. These activities include design, procure-nent, warehousing, construction, installation, maintenance, modification, inspection, testing, operation, and auditin5 The Operations QA Plan requires - that such quality-related work be performed according to proced.res. QA Managers, or their designees, will identify in plant or departmental procedures those procedures and revisions which are reviewed by QA for compli-i ance with the HlAP QA Program, 10CFR50 Appendix B, and applicable federal 17.2-12 Amendment 62 a

I ATTACHMENTS e STP FSAR ST-HL-AE-3 t e PAGE _#a_0F 33 cpcgHged [ ~. 1 p j f regulations prior to issuance for use. The review is documented and the M comments on the current procedure revision vill be maintained for veriffeation. 17.2.5.2 Acceptance Criteria. Documented instructions, procedures, and drawings will include appropriate quantitative and qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that prescribed activities have been satisfactorily accomplished. Such instructions, procedures, and drawings will be reviewed and approved for compliance with requirements appropriate to their safety classification by individuals qualified to do so. 17.2.6 D4 p tQ ontrol 17.2.6.1 Scope Documents. Scope documents and their revisions which control activities affecting safety related structures, systems, and compo-nents shall be prepared and rNe leved by knowledgeable individuals, and ap-proved by authorized personnel prior to release for use in accordance* with approved procedures. Departments responsible for program implementing documents shall be required to provide and assure the necessary review and approval for instructions, procedures, and drawings. Review and approval assures that issued doeunents include proper quality and technical requirements, and are correct for intend- .ad use. 17.2.6.2 Control of Issuance _and' Revision. The Operations QA Plan requires procedures to be developed for the issuance of instructions, proce. dures, and drawings. The controls for issuing documents include: 1. Documents and revisions are sent to persons or locations on a list of controlled copy holders. 2. Controlled document holders acknowledge, in writing, receipt and inser-tion of documents and revisions thereto. 3. The availability of documents at the point of use prior to comencing an activity. 4. Temporary changes to procedures. 5. Maintaining easter lists of the various documents which indicate the latest revisions of instructions, procedures, and drawings. The documents which are subject to the administrative controls outlined in this sectior: include but are not limited to: 1. Depart. mental procedures 2. Operations QA Plan and QA procedures 3. Plant procedures 4 Drawings 5. Procurement documents 17.2-13 Amendment 62

STP FSAR ATTACHMENT 1 ^ ST-HL-AE-3 M 6. Design docunents PAGE _J2_ 0F 33 I ) f "od441<eti m oecd=c: K Manufacturing, inspection, and testing instructions i OW Test procedures 'i K. Design change requests pK. Nonconformance and N N N h Reports nw. rsAR 12/2% Interdepartmental Procedures. mAfjosi 171AWAGutC.N . f&; Mdnt unege, is responsible for distribution of controlled docurents,

2gs, gsnerated or received on site idhr which plant personnel have the prepara-i tion and final approval or external interface responsibility. Additionally, individual departments are responsible for controlling documents generated or reviewed in the departnent for which the department has preparation and final cpproval or ' external interface responsibility.

Current documents shall be distributed to and used at the location where the proscribed activity is performed. Clearly identified controlled copies of documents shall be used to perform an activity, Uncontrolled; copies shall be clocrly identified. 17.2.6.3 Croups Responsible for Review and Approval. The managers of j ths individual departments performing quality related work for STP are respon-alblo for reviewing and approving their departmental procedures and changes thsreto. Procedures and changes thereto are reviewed prior to issuance for uso es described in Section 17.2.5. vice PrecIcM The Central-Mamrger, NA, reviews and approves the Operations QA Plan, and l chcnges thereto. The Croup Vice President, Nuclear approves the Operations QA Plcn, and changes thereto. The QA Managers approve QA procedures. The Plant Manager is responsible for the approval of plant procedures, instructions, and revisions thereto. Quality related plant procedures are reviewed by QA, as described in Section 17.2.5. Snfety-reisted plant procedures shall be reviewed, by an individual knowledge. cblo in the area affected by the procedure, no less frequently than every two ysers to determine if changes are necessary or desirable. This review shall b3 performed by a member of a designated review group as an independent activ-ity that is at least as rigorous as the initial procedure review. A general revision to a procedure constitutes a review. 19 crder to ensure that procedures in current use provide the best possible instructions for performance of the work involved, systematic review of proct-dures shall be accomplished fellowing an unusual incident, such as an acci-dant, an unexpected transient, operator error resulting in a significant ovant, or equipment modification to a system. ~ 17.2-14 Acendment 62

r STP TSAR idEITENT1 s ST-HL-AE-3 tO 4 ' Receiving inspection PAGE.19 0F 31 1 He (( '3 5. Post installation test y i Documentary evidence from the supplier that procured items meet procurement quality requirements such as codes, standards, or specifications will be main-toined at the plant site. Such evidence shall be provided by the supplier at tha time of source or receipt inspection for review and verification before ccceptance..The documented evidence vill be retrievable and available at the AJ) plent site prior to installation or use of the procured item. - rje Act. 17.2.7.1.5 vendor Surveillance. Suppliers' certificates of conformance cro periodically evaluated by audits, independent inspections, or tests to cssure that they are valid and results are documented. When acceptance is based on supplier audit or vendor surveillance, documented evidence shall be 3 furnished to.the plant receiving organization. 17.2.7.2 Audits of Suppliers. The H1AP QA audit program, discussed in Section 17.2.18, provides for periodic scheduled audits of suppliers, contrac-tors, subcontractors, and others performing safety related work. The audit schedule is prepared and updated by QA. Frequency of these audits is based on tha safety, complexity, and quality requirements of the item or service being furnished. 17.2.8 Identification and Control of Materials, Parts, and components 17.2.8.1 Identification Requirements. ~The design control documents, as-centro 11ed by Section 17.2.3, require that specifications and drawings include appropriate identification requirements for materials, parts, and components. Rocaipt inspection, as discussed in 17.2.7, shall verify that the item identi-s' fication complies with specification or drawing requirements. The verifica-tien will ensure that material and item identification can be traced to the appropriate documentation, such as specifications, drawings, purchase orders, ponufacturing and inspection documents, NCRs, and physical or chemical test reports. The receiving inspection procedure shall require that the method and locction of the identification does r.ot affect the function or quality of the iten being identified. 17.2.8.2 Maintenance of Identification. Upon completion of receiving inspection, materials, parts, and components are turned over to Nuclear Purchasing and Materials Management for control and storage. Nucicar Purchasing and Materials Management shall develop procedures for the control, atorage, and issuance of material, parts and components. Procedures shall specify that identification be maintained, either on the item or on records ' traceable to the ites, and verified as required throughout fab-rication, erection, installation, and use of the item. The identification cust be verified'and documented as, being correct prior to release for fabrica-tion, ercetion, installation and/or use of the iten. 17.2.9 Control of Special Processes 17.2,9.1 Special Processes. Special proccsses are those special manu-foeturing processes, inspections, tests, and other processes which require the ) qualification of the precedures, technique, anc personnel to assure the ~) 17.2 18 Amendment 62 t

ATTACHMENT l ST-HL-AE-31 O STP FSAR PAGE L OF M da cMQN.st49 l ) ' w 54 quality of the process. These special processes include, but are not limited to: 1. Velding 2. Heat Treating .t W. Nondestructive Testing (NDT) t 4. Chemical cleaning 5. Protective Costing special processes are performed under controlled conditions by qualified per-sonnel using procedures qualified and approved in accordance with applicable codes, standards, or other requirements. For special processes not covered by existing codes or standards, the specific equipment, personnel qualification, and procedure qualification requirements are defined prior to application of the special process, 17.2.9.2 Special Process Qualification. Procedures shall be estab-lished for the qualification of special processes, equipment, and personnel. These procedures shall define the organizational responsibilities for the qualification process. Nuclear FLme Operations; Nuclear Engineering and Construction or the Nuclear Assurance Department qualify H14P special processes, procedures, equipment and personnel. Those special processes, procedures, equipment and personnel qualifications not under the Nuclear Assurance Department are subject to their review and audit. 17.2.9.3 control of Outside Contractors. Qualified outside organiza-tions may be employed to perform special processes and shall be required to conform to the requirements described in this section. Special process proce-dures submitted by an outside organization in accordance with procurement document requirements shall receive a technical review by the responsible engineering organization and a quality review by QA personnel. 17.2.9.4 Records Control. Records shall be maintained and kept current for the qualification of procedures, equipment, and personnel associated with cpecial processes. Records are in sufficient detail to clearly define the procedures. equipment. or personnel being qualified; criteria or requirements i used for qualification; and the individual approving the qualification. 17.2.9.5 qualification of NDE Personnel. Nondestructive examination personnel shall be qualified in accordance with procedures established per the requirements of the American Society for Nondestructive Testing Standard SNT TC 1A 1980 and ASME B6PV Code Section XI as applicable. 17.2.10 Inspection 17.2.10.1 Inspection Tror,ran. A progran for the inspection of quality-related activities at STPEGS shall be established to verify conformance with applicable documents 3 instructions, procedures, drawings, and specifications. 17.2-19 Amendment 62

y A ACHMENT.7-J STP FSAR ST-HL-AE-3M PAGE 30 0F 33 gg 17.2.10.1.4 Supportinx Inspections: Both inspections and process moni-toring shall be used when control of the activity is inadequate without both. Need for such monitoring shall be determined prior to initiation of the activ. icy, if possible, or may be atipulated later if circumstances warrant. 17.2.10.2 Mandatory Inspections. Mandatory inspection hold points are established by the organization performing the work, or QA/QC personnel. Vitnessing or inspecting of hold points by QC shall be required before work can proceed. For onsite work, plant procedures and work instructions shall be reviewed by QA/QC personnel, for concurrence with the established mandatory hold and notification points. Hold points for work performed in vendor facilities are established by vendor surveillance plans, as described in Section 17.2.7. 17.2.10.3 Acceptance. Procedures shall be established for processing inspection data, evaluation of inspection data and final acceptance of inspec-tion data. ne qualified inspector perfoming the inspection is responsible for the immediate evaluation and acceptability of inspection results. The QC Supervisor or designee is responsible for reviewing and evaluating inspection results to assure errors are not made in the recording of data, computations, drawings or specification interpretations. 17.2.11 Test control 17.2.11.1 Test Program. A test program shall be developed to demon-strate that safety-related structures, systems, and components will operate to maintain plant parameters within normal bounds or vill operate to put the plant in a safe condition if parameters exceed normal bounds in service. 17,2.11.1.1 Scope: Test programs ihclude prerequisite and preoperational/ acceptance tests, initial startup tests, surveillance tests, cnd equipment tests including those associated with plant maintenance, modifi-cation, procedure changes, and the acceptance of purchased material. Procedures shall be established for scheduling and performance of surveillance testing to assure that the necessary quality of systems and components is enintained, that ant operations are within the safety limits, and that lin-iting conditiong operation can be met. n e testing frequency shall be at least as frequent as prescribed in the Technical Specifications. Qualified plant staff personnel vill perform surveillance tests. Test performed following maintenance or modification shall satisfy the origi-nal design or test requirements or acceptable engineering-determined alterna-tive. 17.2.11.1.2 Personnel Qualifications: HL&P personnel and contracted personnel performing test activities, including developing and implementing test procedures and evaluating and reporting of test results, shall be trained cnd qualified as specified in Chapters 13 and 14. 17.2.11.1.3 Preoperational auc15f acAa_ / Tests: The preoperational and startup test program is described in Chapter 14 } 17.2.11.2 Test Procedures. Testing shall be performed in accordance with approved procedures. Test procedures shall control when a test is s 17.2-21 Amendment 62-

T /JTACHMEN - ST-HL-AE-3149 sTr fsAR PAGE nl 0F 33 - bfo %%$4349 required and how the test is to be performed. Testproceduresprovidethe following as necessary: 1. The requirements and acceptance. lit e contained in applicable design and procurement documents; 2. Instructions for performing the test, including, prerequisites and cau-tion or safety notespn sufficient detail that t.he test operator interpretation is not required; 3. Specific test equipment with the accuracy required for performing the activity; 4. Provisions for data collection and storage; 5. Acceptance and rejection criteria; 6. Mandatory inspection hold poirts for witness by QC inspector; 7. Provisions for assuring that test prerequisites have been met: 8. Provisions for control of jumpers, lifted leads, or safety tags; 9. Provisions for returning a system to nornal configuration upon comple-tion of the test;, ~ 10. Speelal considerations for suitable environmental conditions shall be noted on the test procedures, as necessary, 17.2.11.3 Data Recording. Evaluation. and Retention. Test data shall b2 recorded and test results reviewed and approved by qualified individuals or grcups. Test procedures, test data, and test data evaluations shall be retained as part of the plant record. i 17.2.12 control of Measuring and Test Equipment 17.2.12.1 calibration Prorry. The calibration and control program established for STPECS shall assure that tools, gauges, and instruments main-l toin their required accuracy. The Plant Manager shall be responsible for the septementation of the calibration progra Each organization shall be respon-sible for assuring that the seasuring an test equipment (MTE) it uses has been calibrated to the accuracy required or its intended use, trastcTB] Procedures shall be established for control and calibration of MTE. The procedures provide for the following: 1. Identifying MTE that require calibration, the required calibration fra-quency, the applicable calibration procedure, the group responsible for calibration, the setpoints and accuracy requirement for the item, the calibration results, the equip::ent maintenance history, the date of the ( last calibration, and the due date for the next calibration. 2. Identification of each piece of MTE with a unique serial number traceable to the test data. 17.2-22 Anendment 62 l 2

I ..- : u :::::.=&; ATlSt.,riIV;Lhli1 ST HL AE-3f 94 PAGE h '0F 33 v INSERT 5 for installed instrumentation. The Vice President, Noelear Engir. earing - i and Construction is responsible-for implementation.of the calibration program for seasuring and test equipment. s x

ATT ACHMENT.I. ST-HL-AE-2m PAGE JGL. 0F 33 STP rSAR rJ c %,$ $ b 3. A calibration label will be attached to HTE to indicate the calibration due date. If this label interferes with the equipment function or is impractical, the calibration label vill be attached to the equipment case. 4 Calibration frequency, based on the required accuracy, purpose, degree of usage, stability characteristics, and other conditions affecting the measurement. 5. A requirement for reference standards to have an uncertainty error of no more than one fourth of the tolerance of the equipment being calibrated, unless the minimum uncertainty is limited by the state of the art. In these cases, standards shall have an accuracy that assures the equipment being calibrated will be within the required tolerance and that the basis of acceptance is documented. 6. Traceability of reference and transfer standards to nationally recog-nized standards, and provisions for documenting the basis for calibra-tion where national standards do not exist. 7. Documented investigations to determine the m lidity of previous inspec-tions and tests performed when measuring erfs test equipment is found to be out of calibration. The investigations shall evaluate the necessity of repeating original measurements, inspections, tests, or calibrations to establish the acceptability of such items. 8. Repair or replacement of calibration, measuring, and test equipment consistently found to be out of calibration. Inspection, test, e.aintenance, repair, and other procedures shall include provisions to assure that HTE used in activities affecting quality are of the proper range, type, and eccuracy to verify conformance to requirements and test parameters. Special calibration and control measures shall not apply to rulers, tape sta-sures, levels, and other devices if normal comercial practice affords ade-quate accuracy. 17.2.12.2 Records. Records of Hl.6P plant calibration activities shall be maintained.by-the-plantstaff-?- 17.2.13 Handlin.x, Storage, and Shipping Safety related material, equipment, and components shall be handled, stored, shipped, cleaned, and preserved to assure that the quality of items is main-tained from fabrication through installation. Procedures shall be developed for the storage and control of safety related materials and equipment to minimize the possibility of damage or lowering of quality while in storage. Material and equipment shall be stored at locations which have a designated storage level. The various storage levels shall be procedurally defined and shall have prescribed environt ental conditions. The storage conditions shall be in accordance with design end procurement require-ments to preclude damage, loss, or deterioration due to harsh environmental conditions. Items having limited calendar or operating life shall be identi-17.2-23 Amendment 62

x ATTACHMENT 2 ST-HbAE-1t +9 STP FSAR PAGE n 4 0F G This function is performed by various H14P organizations in accordance with approved procedures; ~4. Methods to control altering the sequence of required tests, inspections, and other' operations on safe *:y-related structures, systems', and compo-nents are subject to the same controls as the original review and approval; 5. Administrative control of nondestructive test reports and status indica-tors; 6. Verification of the application of velding stamps, 7. Administrative control of hold and equipment status tags used in the plant. 17.2.14.2 Inspection and Test Status. The inspection and test status of items received at the Plant shall be identified in accordance with proce-tdures. The QC receipt inspector shall identify acceptability of the inspec-tion by affixing the appropriate tag to the item where practical. The cognizant '=: sufficient knowledge of system or equipmentSupervisor shall be responsible for maintaining l to control the overall plant operation. tests or inspections in progress tions shall keep the opg p Personnel performing tests or inspec- ,the current status of test,t4eo-Supervisor or Control Room Operator advised of l operations. s or inspections in progress which may affect plant 17.2.14.3 Operating Status. The operating status of systems, struc-tures, and components that are in the process of maintenance, modification,- testing, inspection, or refueling 'shall be controlled by a tagging system. The tagging procedures shall include: I 1. Authorization for requesting that equipment be removed from service; 2. Checks which must be made before approving the request; 3. Approval to remove equipment from service; 4 Responsibility and action necessary for isolating the equipment; and S. Responsibility and actions necessary for returning the equipment to operating status. j i j 17.2.14.4 Nonconforming item Status. Nonconforming items or structures j shall be identified with a nonconformance hold tag in accordance with Section 17.2.15 to prevent inadvertent use. 17.2.14.3 M, manufacturing Inspection and Test Status. Procurement docu-unts shall require suppliers of safety related items to maintain the status of required inspections or tests throughout the manufacturing process to pre-clude inadvertent bypassing of such inspections and tests. L J l i 17.2-25 Amendment 62 i

Y _ __ g - ST-HL-AE am 4 STP FSAR. 1 PAGE 4 5 0F _33 'I ^ p do^f.y49 i qA vendor control personnal.shall perform selective surveillance or inspection A' { -os required by the procurement documenta to verify adherence to inspection and )

test'statua requirements..

17.2.14.6 - Sequence Chante Control. Procedures shall include the con-trol of the. sequence of required inspections, tests, and other operations when icportant to quality..To change these controls the individual procedure must bo changed and shall require the same review and approval that was received by 'ths original procedure. 17.2.15

Nonconforming Material', Parts, and Components.

17.2.15.1 Nonconformance Control. Procedures shall be established for th9 control of identified nonconformances to prevent the inadvertent use of d2foctive or indeterminate items. Items that deviate from approved specifica-tiens, codes, drawings, or other applicable druments !te considered as non-E [i conforming. These procedures shall provide for documenting the nonconforming 1 iten or nonconforming activity. Nonconformance documentation shall identify the specifies of the nonconfor. . mance and serve as' a notification of the responsible organization. The non-conformance documentation shall. state the particular drawing, procedure, spec-ification,' or other requirement not me; shall state the disposition; shall arocord the review and approval of the disposition; shall indicate the rein-spisetion of the item, if applicable; and shall record the closure authority of ths nonconforaance. i rr To prevent the : inadvertent use or installation of nonconforming items, they

shall be clearly identified where practical to indicate their unacceptable

_. / status, and if possible they are segregaced until the nonconformance is prop-orly dispositioned. Material nonconformance disposition categories are: 1. "Use-as is"; s 2. " Reject"; 3.- ' Rework" in accordance with documented procedures; and 4 " Repair" in accordance with documented procedures. Procedures shall identify the individuals or groups. responsible for providin6 the disposition of nonconformances. The "use as is" and " repair" disposit.ing of ~ nonconforming items shall be' approved and justified in writing by(En[i,n,eer'- ing prior to implementation. The disposition and recommended action afe reviewed by_ QA and approved by the Plant Manager --4k N:Mg %esw or r dasigneef as appropriate, prior to implementation. Repaired and reworked items shall be reinspected to inspection criteria at least.as stringent as those applied to the original work. Reinspection re-suits are docturented on nonconformance reportsc' inspection reports, or other = suitable type docunent by QC personnel, i 17.2.15.2 Supplier Centrol. Procedures shall provide for the control of further processing-or delivery of nonconforming or defective items found at ~ / 17.2 26 Amendment 62' 1 r 1 i. _----_--__-________-_._a-.___.--_A

ATTACHMENTS STP FSAR ST-HL-AE-3M PAGE M - OF 33 i g, cwqt a supplier facility pending a decision on their disposition. tor, supplier, or service organization identifies a nonconforming item andWhenac recommends a "use as-is' or " repair" disposition, concurrence of the responsi-ble H11P Engineering group with the disposition is required. 17.2.15.3 C_onditional Release. Nonconforming materid, parts, and components may be installed after the effect of their installe. tion.has b en evaluated and the t installation approved by the Plant Manager,(Engineering, and QA, or their designees. Nonconforming items which may not be installed are those which because of their makeup and intended use cannot be returned to their original state after being installed and those which if installed in and j later removed from a system, structure, or component, would cause degradation. for proof testing, installed nonconforming items are not energized, Except { used, or placed in service until the action required by the disposition including re-inspection, have been completed or a conditional release has been prepared to justify the intended use of the nonconforming item. 17.2.15.4 Trend Analysis. The plant trending program provides a . mechanism for review and analysis of equipment, system, or program i deficiencies. The results of these reviews and analyses are reported to the af fected organization and executive management and are audited by the QA organization on a b! annual basis. Significant adverse trends shall be handled in accordance with Section 17.2.16. 17.2.15.5 Reportable Conditions Significant conditions during plant operations involving a defect or noNonpliance in a delivered component or service which could create a substantial safety hazard shall be reported p. the Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to the requirements of 10CFR21 during operation and 10CFR50.55(e) during the preoperational test phase. 17.2.16 Corrective Action 17.2.16.1 Identification and Correction. Procedures shall be estab-11shed to assure that conditions adverse to quality are prorptly identified, reported, and corrected to preclude recurrence. Corrective actions associated with the resolution of deficiencies are processed in accordance with Sections 17.2.15, 17.2.16, and 17.2.18, respec tively. These deficiency reporting mechanisms identify conditions adverse to quality in systems, components, equipzent, processes, and procedures. The action for disposition of the deficiency is documented on the appropriate deficiency report forms. Deficiency reports identify conditions adverse to quality in quality-related octivities. The corrective action for problems identified by deficiency l reports are determined by the responsible organization,md-swtw+64- )Tha=QA w g+mbritm--ver4 f,14.c-satMMLay-cap h t hn-ef-4Le amer,, Qiu se R

1) unacceptable completion of corrective action is identified by QA and returned to the respon.sible organization for correction.

of the activity. This may result in suspension Disputes over corrective action are normally resolved by the Plant Manager.w 4m#g-preynaetonaL-teefrrg-ty=th 5tW-Honege w Should this resolution not be satisfactory, the parties may elevate the matter to higher management for resolution. l bDs ed C 17.2-27 Amendaent 62

i ,4 3 t_ ,#r, ATTACHMENT 2 ST-HL-AE-31 W i PAGE W OF E e i- }: Insert C l i QA will review and verify satisfactory completion of corrective action on Deficiency Reports, Nonconformance Reports and selected other deficiency reporting mechanisms. QA will also verify satisfactory - completion of corrective actions on other selected deficiency reporting ' ' mechanisms'..1 implementing procedures describe which documents require the QA organization to review and/or verify corrective actions. The QA organization will audit the corrective action process. 6 O O l e d 4FP 9 '1 9

ATTACHMENT 1 STP FSAR. ST-HL-AE-3W9 PAGE M L_0F 3 7 g g g#h,S 4g j M .{ torrective action documentation for significant deficiencies shall include . d: cementation of the cause, and the action taken to correct and to preclude b g 1 tha recurrence of stallar conditions adverse to quality. j 1 17.2.16.2 S hnificant conditions Adverse to Quali n. Procedures which ," idintify and track deficiencies shall require management review of each report I to d>termine if the ' condition is significant. For significant condttions J advarse to quality, the cause of the condition and the corrective action taken to preclude repetition shall be documented and reported to appropriate levels of senagement for review and assessment. Significt ot items or condi tions idantified at STPEGS shall be reviewed and corrective action shall t e recom-sandad on conditions adverse to safety regarding operating procedurns. 17.2.17 Quality Assurance Records 17.2.17.1 Suf! ciency of Records. Procedures shall be developed to assure that sufficien records are maintained to furnish evidence of activi-tios meeting quality requirements. The program for QA records control shall osat the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B, and RG 1.88 (Reference Table (A Jaci.,4 &p0 liA(c.n elec&on:c ciclaba cef To ossure that proper documents are identified as QA r'ecords and properly stored, procedures shall identify those documents which are defined to be QA records. frocederde) shall identify the retention time for each document, with retention time being consistent with applicable codes, standards, and procurement documents _.j These records include, but are not limited to: plant OTstory; operating logs; records of principle maintenance and modification cetivities; reportable occurrences and other records required by the Technical Specifications; results of reviews, inspections, tests, audits, and material on21ysis; monitoring of work performance; qualification of personnel, proce-duros, and equipment; drawings, specifications, procurement documents, ware. .bousing documents, calibration procedures and calibration reports; s'id, non-conformance and corrective action reports. Th3 records control program provides evidence that activities relating to f quality are defined, implemented, and that inspection and test documents con-toin: a description of the type of observation; the identification of inspector or data recorder; the date and inspection or test results; accept-cbility of the results; reference to nonconformance reports; and reference any cetion taken in resolving any nonconformances. d Qrecord or docwninh ewd pacMa9e 7 17.2.17.2 Record Identification and Retrievab11'ity. To ensure that QA records are identifiable and retrievable, a computerized records management systen has been developed. This/ system provides for-e-4mique-alphenumerie-identification for each document. Registers are provided which list QA records and their identification. The system provides the ability to / cross reference the identification with other possible identifiers of the document (i.e., specification number, purchase order nu , equipnent number). QA records may be stored on photographic medi the file locations of documents are available from the computer. ficc8 onsN or l retronic raclk ; 17.2.17.3 Frotection of Records. QA records shall be stored in a per-manent records storage facility which complies with RG 1.88 (Reference Table 3.12-1). f.--__ - - - -- rA c, ca..tlief of r M be" 17.2-28 Amendment 62 J r#9 ofo"n tv es c r isf r b < b > < c., fe (*# $te (**** E9k Stees<krd,or h Cit $ ties i a n ger ' rr 4c.,b en parto<l & alI kb< sefCkE A- __________o

3 STP FSAR ATTACHMENTS ST-HL-AE-3W) 17.2.la gig PAGE M OF 33 gg 17.2.18.1 Audit Program. A comprehensive audit program in complian b with RC 1,144 shall be established and implemented by H14P to verify internal and external quality activity compliance with the Operations QA Program. The audit program shall assure that applicable elemtnts of the program have been developed, documented, and are effectively implemented and shall provide for reporting and reviewing audit results by appropriate levela of management. The audit system shall include internal and external audits, ne system shall be planned, documented, and conducted to assure coverage of applicable ele-ments of the Operations QA Program, and overall coordination and scheduling of audit activities. Audit planning includes the organization and activity to be audited, audit frequency, and schedule. The annual audit' plan shall be approved by the General Manager, NA. Audits shall be conducted using written plans in accordance with QA proce-dures. The procedures require evaluation of work areas, activities, proces-ses, goods, services, and the review of documents and records for quality related practices, procedures, and instructions to determine the effectiveness of the septementation of OQAP and compliance with 10CFR50, Appendix 3. The following areas are included in the audit program: 1. Operation, maintenance, and modifications; 2. Preparation, review, approval, and control of designs, specifications, procurement dociments, instructions, procedures, and drawings; 3. Material control instructions; i 4 Indoctrination and training programs; 5. Implementation of operating and test procedures: 6. Calibration of acasuring and test equipment; 7. Corrective action and nonconfornance control; 8. Performance of the plant staff, including training records; 9. Startup testing and administrative controls; and 10. Plant inspection activities. An individual audit plan shall identify the audit scope, the requirements, the opp 11 cable documents, and written procedures or checklists as appropriate. The audit plan and any necessary reference docusents shall be available to the audit team seabers. External audits shall be conducted by QA as a neasure for the evaluation of { procurement sourcer and as a postavard source verification of confornance to l procurement documents. Audits conducted by other organizations, including I other utilities or A/Es, may be employed as a means of postavard source veri-fication in lieu of HIAP perforned audits. Applicable elements of suppliers' QA programs shall be audited on a frequency that is based upon the status and safety classification of the activities 17.2-29 Amendment 62 l

'Aheccit.sh ST-HL-AE-31 STP FSAR PAGE.30__ 0F '33 i TO cWj,6' 9g other personnel may assist in the condver of audits, such as technical spe-br Eg cialf ats, management representatives, or auditors in training. Such personnel selected for auditin rate with the scope,g assignments shall have training or experience commensu-complexity, or special nature of the activities to be audited. Personnel performing audits shall have no direct responsibility for the area audited. 1 ersonnel may assist in the conduct of audits, such as technical sne. r cialis ement representatives, or audien" -!: h ing. such personnel selected for aud t rate with the scope. . ents e ave training or experience commensu-eef al nature of the activities to be i l audited. Pe performing audits s a haua 2HLoirect responsibility for l th udited. j i 17.2.18.5 Audit Resv12 Records shall be collected, stored, and main-tained in accordance with the requirements in Section 17.2.17. Audit reports shall be distributed to the audited organization as well as the appropriate executive management for their review and evaluation. Audit results shall be periodically reviewed by the QA Organization for quality trends and overall audit program effectiveness. The results of these reviews shall be reported to appropriate management in periodic summary ) reports of audit activities. i i i f l l 17.2 31 Amendment 62 l }

"., ~,ndreT A / ST-HL-AE-3'O e PAGE 34 0F 33 ..o: GuhLIT ORGhc rz.MTioi) h l I f O F

  • P""

A QQll A Af 5 4 %F %F L G Pi w w U P% 41 (%7 6_C A F'" M A D "f" R A C" Pi f *T" L/ L F t 4a6.s awar 3W I / Group VP Nuclear Wt.c. Reseles I ~ NaJe.e Assors., k gg,gr.T r. n; _ t. o.. r 0' .I,e, r+ Cenerc! Manager Nuclear Assurance 1 um:: =w~.j I I Audits / Quelity ] Inspcetion/ -3 Assessments Engine; ring b' Surveillance i I I t::r ax;c >.w. t.j p.r:~.tr.~s; y2 1 . rm r. .m ~ i i Picnt Auolto l Ploot Procedurce/ '} Plant inepectient/ a t. ] Programs Survelliance i 4 a 1 1 ] 1 a ' ~ 62.aw.,i.w.s-M a u t_. - a _ a _s o._.. uu m _

-w =-_ _-

Vendor Audits 1 Vendor Procedures / 1 Vendor Inspectlens/ Progrcms Survettience i } wm .a Tw =+.,,-..., J _,m.s.u a Monogement Pro.urement Contrccter 3 Audits Documents inspections / l Surveillance i p iwn=.rzaxm=a w_m& _.. -. m 1 l SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT s UNITS 1 & 2 i i NUCLEAR ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT i C-0675 ngure 17.2-1 Amendment 62 l I i J

g er a a a. 2 AOM r o n l R t p M t sa P e n g P& U s ins e a i _usM n M i. m O o

  1. I Ll

\\ S1 Ri d e Gt A n A c e R n G X S l, A u L E T Ef L I C TN U A h H U NO T U O r M e S i t 1 S I w ~ @ce { i r ,e h d n C p f e t

  • r a

u e

  • e C r e n. d M o a

A P M cr ? r M O - u s s C t

s R

e A r I A n ". e A 2[ f EP O0 id 't P r a WV c. e 'E' a r S s P e e r e c r e l e M e 4 P e c e

  • d 1

Cf ect 0 u W t f A J N ( f wt cu { O t t in 7 C V 2 U Ck c I n L er 4 C 0 1 l r 1 J u o 1 4 t NS 3 t w r! .n ~ i. a o-t, ,i ,ei c* r r n e . e e;c e *" a ee r.n G t e 69 it ,e r C .n, e r-w,- c t& g, u hnigm ,sL t e r %gw - a..e. t r. iie m.r sr e ., n n. emt u ine r r = s n.m P m i. egn ^ v ~- e ah cne s c iEC = e V u w n e ~ ~ y ~ le h i ~ sl N s n y o p a t it i l r fa t c r t ne r rl ec rr, e r een ond ,eoe-fde 2 eS ge e sei pe e 0 n ut n e g . r e g et t 7 ". ti. u -s i rn M a M e Mu p e P e lc

3. t 4

h c *- e d s. a u e ir N l w t Ve e y., e c ls u ca - N _I J 4, l. e n, r )c I1I ,) l

,1:

l' 4^

w w"m aC la !dfIE] e,.E m $ $ wam W[ Q ,h ~ .1 9 4 3' N 2-E E A V . *L LN syg gc, pml' w'u0 y &E M I ,}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ST-HL-AE-3149,_Forwards_Annotated_Revs_to_FSAR_Section_17.2_%26_Organizational_Changes&oldid=3908147"