SECY-06-0074, Cover Letters to ROP Consolidated Response to External Survey
Text
July 12, 2006 John S. Fuoto, PE Principal Engineering AMEC Earth & Environmental Inc.
14428 Albemarle Point Place Suite 150 Chantilly, VA 20151-1652
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Fuoto:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 James Raleigh Senior Nuclear Industry Consultant 6613 Trumpeter Street N. Las Vegas, NV 89084
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Raleigh:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 George Pannell Pannell Consulting 4630 Fiore Bella Blvd.
Las Vegas, NV 89135
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Pannell:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 Thomas Gurdziel 9 Twin Orchard Drive Oswego, NY 13126
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Gurdziel:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 Jim Hardeman, Manager Environmental Radiation Program Environmental Protection Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources 4220 International Parkway, Suite 100 Atlanta, GA 30354
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Hardeman:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 James E. Knorr License Renewal Project Manager Nuclear Management Company 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, WI 54241-9516
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Knorr:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 Stanley T. Gamble Exelon 300 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Gamble:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 Paul B. Eccard First Selectman Town of Waterford 15 Rope Ferry Road MS:06385 Waterford, CT 06385
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Eccard:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 Charles Williams Preparedness Division Chief Alabama Emergency Management Agency 5898 County Road 41 Clanton, AL 35046
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Williams:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 Jim Riccio Greenpeace 702 H Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20001
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Riccio:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 Edward J. Weinkam Director, Nuclear Licensing & Regulatory Services Nuclear Management Company, LLC 700 First Street Hudson, Wisconsin 54016
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Weinkam:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 Robert L. Biggs Chairman, RUG IV Region IV Utility Group 4200 South Hulen Drive, Suite630 Ft. Worth, TX 76109
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Biggs:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 Exelon Generation Company, LLC Byron Station 4450 North German Church Road Byron, IL 61010-9794
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 David Lochbaum Union of Concerned Scientists 1707 H Street NW, Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20006
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Lochbaum:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 Anthony R. Pietrangelo Vice President Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, NW Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20006-3708
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Pietrangelo:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 D.R. Woodlan Chairman, Integrated Regulatory Affairs Group Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing P.O. Box 1002 Glen Rose, TX 76043
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Woodlan:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 David P. Helker Manager - Licensing AmerGen Enegery Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Helker:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 B. Pook Region 5/6 Emergency Management Office of Disaster Preparedness 435 North Park Avenue Courthouse - Room 101b Fremont, NE 68025
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear B. Pook:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 Eric Joseph Epstein Chairman of Three Island Alert, Inc.
EFMR Monitoring Group 4100 Hillsdale Road Harrisburg, PA 17112
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Epstein:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 A. Edward Scherer Manager of Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Southern California Edison P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92672
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Scherer:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated
July 12, 2006 Eric Joseph Epstein Chairman of Three Island Alert, Inc.
EFMR Monitoring Group 4100 Hillsdale Road Harrisburg, PA 17112
SUBJECT:
2005 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE, SOLICITATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE SIXTH YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS
Dear Mr. Epstein:
Thank you for providing comments and participating in the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) 2005 Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) annual self-assessment. The self-assessment is used to determine whether the ROP has been effective in meeting program goals and achieving its intended outcomes, as well as to identify areas needing improvement. Identified areas for improvement are then evaluated and incorporated, if appropriate, into the key ROP program areas of performance indicators, inspection, significance determination process, and assessment. The self-assessment results are documented in a staff paper to the NRC Commission. The paper is SECY-06-0074, Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (ADAMS Accession Number ML060590185), which was discussed with the Commission during a public meeting on May 16, 2006.
To more directly address and respond to stakeholder comments, the NRC has consolidated the public comments received and provided a comprehensive response to the public comments.
This document, entitled Consolidated Response to the 2005 Reactor Oversight Process External Survey (ML061300055), along with the Commission paper (ML060590185) and the annual ROP performance metric report (ML060590135), will be posted to the ROP Web page and are attached for your convenience.
The staff appreciates your participation in this effort. Questions and comments should be directed to Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at (301) 415-5735 or Ronald Frahm at (301) 415-2986.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Stuart A. Richards, Deputy Director Division of Inspection & Regional Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosed: As Stated DISTRIBUTION:
IPAB IRIB ADAMS: ML061300043 - response letters, ML061300055 - attachment response, ML060590188 - secy paper, ML060590135 - performance metric report OFFICE DIRS/IPAB DIRS/IPAB:BC DIRS/IRIB:BC DIRS:DD NAME MThorpe-Kavanaugh JAndersen RGibbs SRichards DATE 04/27/06 05/24/06 05/24/06 07/12/06 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY