RS-13-064, Submittal of Updated Clinton Power Station Site-Specific Safstor Decommissioning Cost Estimate
| ML13063A531 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 03/01/2013 |
| From: | Simpson P Exelon Generation Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Document Control Desk |
| References | |
| RS-13-064 E16-1640-006, Rev 0 | |
| Download: ML13063A531 (131) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:1 2000 r RS-13-064 RS-13-064 March 1, March 1, 2013 2013 u.s. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: A Document Control TIN: Document Control Desk Desk Washington,DC Washington, DC 20555-0001 20555-0001 Clinton Power Station Clinton Facility Operating Facility Operating License No. NPF-62 NRC Docket No. 50-461 NRC
Subject:
Submittal of Submittal of Updated Updated Clinton Power Station Site-Specific Clinton Power Site-Specific SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate Decommissioning
Reference:
Reference:
Letter from from P. R. Simpson (Exelon (Exelon Generation Generation Company) Company) to to U.S. U.S. NRC, NRC, "Submittal of Clinton Power Station Station Site-Specific Site-Specific SAFSTOR SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate," dated August 27,2009 Decommissioning 27, 2009 In the referenced letter, In the letter, Exelon Exelon Generation GenerationCompany, Company,LLC LLC (EGC) (EGC) submitted submitted aa site-specific SAFSTOR Decommissi oning Cost Decommissioning CostEstimate Estimate(DCE) (DCE)for forClinton Clinton Power Power Station (CPS). Attached is an updated DCE that Attached is an updated DCE that has hasbeen beenperformed performedin in accordance accordance with with EGC's normal practice of of updating DCEs DCEs every every five five years. years. There are are no no new newregulatory regulatory commitmen commitments ts contained contained inin this letter. IfIf you have anyany questions questions about aboutthis thisletter, letter, please pleasecontact ThomasJ.J.Griffith contactThomas Griffithatat(630) (630)657-2818. 657-2818. VV Patrick Patrick R. R. Simpson Simpson Manager Manager - Licensing Licensing Exelon Exelon Generation Generation Company, Company, LLC LLC
Attachment:
Attachment:
Clinton Clinton Power Power Station Station Decommiss ioning Cost Decommissioning CostEstimate Estimate
ATTACHMENT ATTACHMENT Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Estimate Estimate
Document E16-1640-006, Rev. Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 DECOMMISSIONING COST ANALYSIS for for the CLINTON POWER STATION prepared for prepared for Company, LLC Exelon Generation Company, LLC prepared by prepared by TLG Services, Inc. Bridgewater, Connecticut Connecticut December 2012 December 2012
Clinton Power Station Station DocumentE16-1640-006, Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Decommissioning CostCost Analysis Page ii of xvii xvii APPROVALS Project Manager l'vIanager d~r::! LZ-~ CJ William A. William Jr: A. Cloutier, Jr/ Date Project Engineer John A. John A. Carlson Date Technical Manager 1/-:1;0
~
TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev. 00 DecommissioningCost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Page Page iii ofxvii iii of xvii TABLEOF TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS SECTION SECTION PAGE PAGE EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
~CUTIVE SUMMA.RY..................
.............................................................................. vii-xvii
............................................................vii-xvii 1.
- 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1-1 1-1 1.1 1.1 Objectives of Objectives ofStudy Study ...........................................................................................
...........................................................................................1- 1-11 1.2 1.2 Site Description Site Description.................................................................................................
.................................................................................................1-1 1-1 1.3 1.3 Regulatory Regulatory Guidance ........................................................................................
........................................................................................1-2 1-2 1.3.1 Nuclear 1.3.1 Nuclear Waste Policy Act.. ....................................................................
Act ................... 1-4
...................................................1-4 1.3.2 1.3.2 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Acts ......................................................
...................................................... 1-6 1-6 1.3.3 Radiological 1.3.3 Radiological Criteria for for License License Termination Termination .................................... 1-7
.................................... 1-7 2.
- 2. DECOMMISSIONING ALTERNATIVES DECOMMISSIONING ALTERNATIVES ................... ..........................................................
....................................... 2-1 2-1 2.1 .............................................................................................................. 2-2 2.1 DECON .............................................................................................................. 2-2 2.1.1 2.1.1 Period 1 - Preparations Preparations .........................................................................
......................................................................... 2-2 2-2 2.1.2 Period 2 - Decommissioning Decommissioning Operations Operations .............................................. 2-4
.............................................. 2-4 2.1.3 Period 3 - Site Restoration ................... .................................................................... 2-8
................................................. 2-8 2.1.4 2.1.4 ISFSI ISFSI Operations and Decommiss Decommissioning ............................................
ioning ................... 2-9
......................... 2-9 2.2 2.2 SAFSTOR SAFSTOR AND AND DELAYEDDELAYED DECOMMI DECOMMISSIONING .....................................
SSIONING ................... 2-9
.................. 2-9 2.2.1 2.2.1 Period 1 - Preparations Preparations ...................
....................................................................... 2-10
.................................................... 2-10 2.2.2 2.2.2 Period 2 -- DormancyDormancy ...................
.........................................................2-11 2-11 2.2.3 2.2.3 Periods Periods 3 and and 44 -- Delayed Delayed Decommiss Decommissioning .....................................
ioning ................... ..................22-12
-12 2.2.4 2.2.4 Period Period 5 -- Site Site Restoration Restoration ...................
.................................................................. 2-13
............................................... 2-13 3.
- 3. COST COSTESTIMATE ESTIMATE ...................................................................................................
................... ................................................................................ 3-1 3-1 3.1 Basis of 3.1 Basis ofEstimate Estimate...................
........................................................................... 3-1 3-1 3.2 3.2 Methodolog Methodology y ...................
................................................................................... 3-1 3-1 3.3 Financial Component 3.3 Financial Components s ofofthe the Cost Cost Model Model .......................................................
................... .................................... 3-33-3 3.3.1 3.3.1 Contingenc Contingency y ...................
........................................................................ 3-3 3-3 3.3.2 3.3.2 Financial FinancialRisk Risk...................
..................................................................... 3-5 3-5 3.4 3.4 Site-Specifi Site-Specific c Considerati Considerations .............................................................................
ons ................... .......................................................... 3-6 3-6 3.4.1 3.4.1 Spent SpentFuel FuelManagemen Management.. ..................................................................... t ................... .................................................... 3-6 3-6 3.4.2 3.4.2 Reactor ReactorVessel Vesseland andInternal InternalComponent Components ........................................... s .................. 3-9
......................... 3-9 3.4.3 3.4.3 Primary PrimarySystem SystemComponent Components .............................................................
s ................... .......................................... 3-11 3-11 3.4.4 3.4.4 Main MainTurbine Turbineand and Condenser Condenser .............................................................
................... .......................................... 3-11 3-11 3.4.5 3.4.5 Transportat Transportation ion Methods Methods .....................................................................
................... .................................................. 3-11 3-11 3.4.6 3.4.6 Low-Level Low-LevelRadioactiveRadioactiveWaste WasteDisposal Disposal .............................................
................... .......................... 3-123-12 3.4.7 3.4.7 Site SiteConditions ConditionsFollowing FollowingDecommiss Decommissioning ....................................
ioning ................... 3-13
................. 3-13 TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc.
Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev.00 Decommissio ning Decommissioning Cost CostAnalysis Analysis Page Pageiv ivofofxvii xvii TABLE TABLEOF OF CONTENTS CONTENTS (continued) (continued) SECTION SECTION PAGE PAGE 3.5 Assumptions 3.5 Assumptions .....................
............................................................................... 3-14 3-14 3.5.1 Estimating 3.5.1 Estimating Basis Basis.....................
................................................................................. 3-14
............................................................ 3-14 3.5.2 Labor 3.5.2 Labor Costs .....................
..................................................................... 3-14 3-14 3.5.3 Design 3.5.3 Design Conditions Conditions .....................
................................................................................ 3-14
........................................................... 3-14 3.5.4 General 3.5.4 General .....................
................................................................................................. 3-15
............................................................................ 3-15 3.6 Cost 3.6 Cost Estimate Estimate SummarySummary.....................
............................................................................... 3-17
.......................................................... 3-17 4.
- 4. SCHEDULE ESTIMATE ......................................................................................
...................................................................................... 4-1 4-1 4.1 Schedule Estimate Assumptions ..................................................................... 4-1
..................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Project Project Schedule Schedule ................................................................................................
................................................................................................ 4-2 4-2
- 5. RADIOACTIVE WASTES RADIOACTIVE WASTES.....................
................................................................ 5-1 5-1
- 6. RESULTS RESULTS ..................... ............................................................................................ 6-1
................................................................................................................. 6-1
- 7. REFERENC REFERENCES ES .....................
........................................................................................................ 7-1
................................................................................... 7-1 TABLES Summary Summaryof of Decommissi Decommissioning oning Cost Cost Elements, Elements,DECON DECON....................
................................ xv
............ xv Summary Summaryof of Decommissi Decommissioning oning Cost Cost Elements, Elements,Delayed DelayedDECON DECON.................
................. xvi xvi Summary Summaryof ofDecommissi Decommissioning oning Cost CostElements, Elements,SAFSTOR SAFSTOR....................
........................... xvii
....... xvii 3.1 3.1 Schedule Schedule of of Annual Annual Expenditure Expenditures, DECON....................
s, DECON .................................................
............................. 3-183-18 3.2 3.2 Schedule Schedule of Annual Expenditure of Annual Expenditures, DelayedDECON s, Delayed DECON....................
................................... 3-19
............... 3-19 3.3 3.3 Schedule Schedule of of Annual AnnualExpenditure Expenditures, SAFSTOR....................
s, SAFSTOR ..............................................
.......................... 3-203-20 5.1 5.1 Decommissi Decommissioningoning Waste WasteSummary,Summary,DECON DECON....................
............................. 5-35-3 5.2 5.2 Decommissi Decommissioningoning Waste WasteSummary,Summary,Delayed DelayedDECON DECON....................
................................... 5-4
............... 5-4 5.3 5.3 Decommissi Decommissioningoning Waste WasteSummary,Summary,SAFSTOR SAFSTOR.....................
............................................. 5-5
.......................... 5-5 6.1 6.1 Summary of Decommissi Summary of Decommissioning oning Cost Cost Elements, Elements,DECON DECON....................
............................... 6-4
........... 6-4 6.2 6.2 Summary SummaryofofDecommissi Decommissioning oning Cost CostElements, Elements,Delayed DelayedDECON DECON.................
.................6-5 6-5 6.3 6.3 Summary SummaryofofDecommissi Decommissioning oning Cost CostElements, Elements,SAFSTOR SAFSTOR....................
............................ 6-6
........ 6-6 TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc.
Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev. 00 DecommissioningCost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Page Pagevvof ofxvii xvii TABLE TABLEOF OF CONTENTS CONTENTS (continued) (continued) SECTION SECTION PAGE PAGE FIGURES FIGURES 4.1 4.1 Activity Activity Schedule Schedule ..............................................................................................
.............................................................................................. 4-34-3 4.2 4.2 Decommissioning Timeline, Decommissioning Timeline, DECON DECON ..............................................................
.............................................................. 4-5 4.3 4.3 Decommissioning Timeline, Delayed Decommissioning Delayed DECON ................................................
................................................ 4-6 4.4 4.4 Decommissioning Decommissioning Timeline, SAFSTOR SAFSTOR ..........................................................
.......................................................... 4-7 APPENDICES A.
A. Unit Cost Factor Factor Development Development ............................................................................. A-I A-i B. Unit Cost Cost Factor Factor Listing Listing......................................................................................
...................................................................................... B-1 C.
C. Detailed Cost Analysis, DECON .......................................................................... C-l C-1 D. D. Detailed Cost Cost Analysis, Analysis, Delayed DelayedDECON DECON...........................................................
...........................................................D-1 D-l E.
E. Detailed Cost Detailed Cost Analysis, Analysis, SAFSTOR SAFSTOR ...................................................................... E-l E-1 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev.00 Decommissi oning Decommissioning Cost CostAnalysis Analysis Page Pagevi viof ofxvii xvii REVISION REVISION LOG LOG I No. Date Item Revised Reason for Revision 0 12-03-2012 Original Issue TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev.00 Decommis sioning Decommissioning Cost CostAnalysis Analysis Page Pageviiviiofofxvii xvii EXECUTIVE EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
This report This report presents presents estimates estimates of the the cost cost to to decommi decommission Clinton Power ssion the Clinton Power Station (Clinton) Station (Clinton) for for the the identified decommis decommissioningsioning scenarios following a scheduled following a scheduled cessation of cessation of plant plant operation operations. s. The The analysis analysis reliesrelies upon uponsite-spec site-specific, technical ific, technical information, developed information, developed in in an an evaluation evaluationinin2007111 2007[1] for forAmerGen AmerGen Energy,Energy, LLC, and LLC, and updated to reflect current updated to reflect current assumptions assumptio ns pertaining to the dispositio disposition n of the nuclear unit and relevant unit relevant industry industry experienc experiencee in undertaki undertaking such projects. ng such projects. In 2008,2008, the operating license was amended operating license was amended to reflect Exelon to reflect Exelon Generati Generating Company,, LLC ng Company LLC (Exelon)as (Exelon) asthe the licensee licensee authorized authorized to to own own and and operate operate the Therefore,, the the station. Therefore updated estimates updated estimates are are designed designed to to provide provide Exelon Exelon with with sufficient sufficient informati information on to to assess assess their financial obligation obligations, s, as they pertain pertain to to the theeventual eventualdecommi decommissioning ssioning of the of the nuclear nuclear station. The primary The primary goal goal of the the decomm issioningisis the decommissioning removal and the removal disposal of and disposal of thethe contamin ated systems contaminated systems and structures soand structures so that the the plant's plant's operating operating license license can be terminated. The analysis recognize terminated. recognizess that that spent fuel fuel will will be be stored stored at at the site in the fuel building's fuel building's storage storage pool pool and/or and/or in in an an independent independent spent fuel storage installatio installation n (ISFSI) until (ISFSI) until such time that that itit can can bebe transferre transferred d to toaaDepartme Department nt ofofEnergy Energy(DOE)(DOE) facility. Consequently,the facility. Consequently, the estimates estimates also also include include those those costs costs to manage and to manage and subsequen tly decommis subsequently decommission sion these these storage storage facilities. facilities. The The estimate estimatess are are based basedononnumerou numerous s fundame fundamental assumptions, ntal assumpti including ons, including regulatory regulatory requireme requirements, nts, project projectcontingen contingencies,cies, low-level low-level radioactiv radioactive waste disposal e waste disposal practices, high-leve l radioactiv practices, high-level radioactive waste e waste management management options, options, and site restoratio and site restoration n requireme requirements. nts. TheThe estimate estimatess incorporincorporate ate aa minimum mmImum cooling cooling periodperiod of of approxim approximately ately five five andand one-half one-halfyears yearsfor forthethe spent spent fuelfuel that resides in that resides in the the fuel fuel building' s building's storagestorage poolpool when when operation operationss cease.cease. In In the theDECON DECONand andSAFSTO SAFSTOR R scenarios scenarios, , any any residual residual fuel fuel remainin remainingg in the the poolpool after afterthe thecooling cooling period period isis relocated relocated to the ISFSI ISFSI to to await await transfer transfer to toaaDOE DOEfacility facility (the (the fuel fuel isis assumed assumedto to remain remain in in the thestorage storagepool poolfor forthetheDelayed DelayedDECON DECONscenario scenario and andtransferre transferred d directly directly fromfrom thethe pool pool to to an anoff-site off-site DOEDOE facility). facility). The The estimates estimates also also include include the the dismantlin dismantling g of of non-essen non-essential tial structures structuresand andlimited limitedrestoratio restorationn ofofthe thesite. site. Alternativ Alternatives es and andRegulatio Regulations ns The The Nuclear Nuclear Regulato Regulatory ry Commiss Commission ion (NRC (NRC or orCommiss Commission) provided initial ion) provided initial decommis decommissioningsioning requireme requirements nts inin its itsrule ruleadopted adoptedon onJune June27, 27,1988.[21 1988,[2] In this this rule, rule, "Decommiss ioning Cost "Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysisforforthe theClinton ClintonPower PowerStation," Station,"Document Document No.E16-1555-00 No. E16-1555-005, Rev. 5, Rev. 0,0,TLG TLGServices, Services,Inc., Inc.,October October20072007 2 U.S. U.S.Code Codeof ofFederal FederalRegulations, Regulations,Title Title10, 10,Parts Parts30, 30,40, 40,50, 50,51, 51,70 70and and7272"General "GeneralRequiremen Requirementsts forfor TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev.00 Decommissi oning Decommissioning Cost CostAnalysis Analysis Page Pageviii viiiof ofxvii xvii the NRC the NRC set set forth financial financial criteria criteria for for decommis decommissioning sioning licensed licensed nuclear power nuclear power facilities. facilities. The Theregulations regulations addressed addressed planning planning needs, needs, timing, timing, funding funding methods, methods, and environmental review environmental review requirements requirements for for decommis decommissioning. sioning.The rule The rule also also defined defined three decommis three decommissioning sioningalternatives alternativesas as being being acceptable acceptable to the NRC: to the NRC: DECON,DECON, SAFSTOR, and SAFSTOR, and ENTOMB. ENTOMB. DECONisis defined DECON definedas as"the "the alternative alternative in in which which thethe equipment, equipment, structures, and portions of a facility and portions of a facility and and site site containing containing radioactive radioactive contaminants contaminants are removedor removed or decontaminated decontaminatedtotoa a level levelthat that permits permits the property to be the property be released released for unrestricted use shortly after unrestricted use shortly aftercessation cessationofofoperations. operations. "[3]
"[3]
SAFSTORisisdefined SAFSTOR definedasas "the "the alternative alternative in which the nuclear in which nuclear facility facility isis placed placed andand maintained in aa condition condition thatthat allows allows the the nuclear nuclear facility facility to to be be safely stored safely stored and subsequen subsequently tly decontami decontaminated (deferred decontami nated (deferred decontamination) nation) to levels that to that permit permitrelease releasefor forunrestricte unrestricted use. "[4] Decommis d use."[41 Decommissioningsioning is to to be completed be completed within within 60 60 years, years, although although longer longer timetime periods periods will will bebe considered when when necessary to to protect public public health health and safety. ENTOMB isis defined ENTOMB defined as as "the "the alternative in in which which radioactive radioactive contamina contaminants nts are encased are encased in aa structurall structurally y long-lived long-lived material, material, such such as as concrete; concrete; the the entombed structure is appropriat appropriately ely maintained maintained and andcontinued continued surveillanc surveillance e is carried carried outout until until the theradioactiv radioactive e material material decays decays to to aalevel level permitting permitting unrestricte unrestricted d release releaseofofthe theproperty." property."[5] [5}As As with with the SAFSTOR SAFSTOR alternative alternative,, decommiss ioning is currently decommissioning currently required required to to be be completed completed within within 6060 years. years. The 60-year restriction has limited the practicality practicality forfor the ENTOMB ENTOMB alternative at at commerci commercialal reactors reactors that that generate generate significant significantamounts amountsofoflong-lived long-livedradioactiv radioactive e material. material. InIn1997,1997,the theCommissio Commission n directed directed itsits staff staff to to re-evaluate re-evaluate this this alternative alternative and identify identify thethe technical technical requireme requirements nts and and regulatory regulatory actions actions thatthatwouldwouldbe be necessary necessary for for entombme entombment nt toto become become aa viableviableoption. option. The The resulting resulting evaluation evaluation provided provided several recommen dations, however, recommendations, however, rulerulemaking making has been been deferred deferred based based upon upon several several factors factors (e.g., (e.g., nono licensee licensee has has committed committed to to pursuing pursuingthe theentombme entombment nt
- option, option, the the unresolved unresolved issues issues associated associated with with the thedisposition dispositionof ofgreater-tha greater-than-Class n-Class C C material material (GTCC),
(GTCC), and and thethe NRC's current priorities) NRC's current priorities) at least until at least until after after the the additional research studies additional research studies are arecomplete. complete. The TheCommissi Commission concurred with on concurred with thethe staffs staffsrecommen dation. recommendation. Decommissio ning Nuclear Decommissioning NuclearFacilities," Facilities,"Nuclear NuclearRegulatory RegulatoryCommission, Commission,Federal FederalRegister Register Volume53, Volume 53, Number Number123 123(p(p24018 24018etetseq.), seq.),June June27,27,1988 1988 3 Ibid. Ibid.Page PageFR24022, FR24022,Column Column33 4 4 Ibid. Ibid. Ibid. Ibid.Page PageFR24023, FR24023,Column Column22 TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev.00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Page Page ix ofxvii ix of xvii InIn 1996, 1996, the the NRC NRC amended amended its decommidecommissioningssioning regulations regulations to to clarify clarify ambiguities ambiguities and codify procedur es and and codify procedures and terminology terminologyas as aa means means of of enhancin enhancing efficiency and g efficiency uniformity in uniformity in the decommi ssioning process.[6 decommissioning process)6] ]The Theamendments amendments allow allow for for greater public participa tion and better public participation and better define the define the transition transition processprocess from from operation operationss to decommissioning.Regulatory decommissioning. RegulatoryGuide Guide1.184,1.184,issuedissuedininJuly July 2000, 2000, further described further described the methods the methods and procedur es acceptab procedures acceptablele to to the the NRC NRC staff for for implemen implementing ting the requirements of requirements of the the 1996 1996 amendments amendments relating relating to to the initial activities activities and and major major phases of phases of the the decommissioning decommissioningprocess. process. The The costs and schedules costs and schedules presented in this this analysis follow analysis follow the the general general guidance guidance and and processes processes described described in the amended in the amended regulations. The regulations. The format format and and content content of of the the estimates estimates is also also consisten consistentt with the the recommen dations of Regulator recommendations Regulatoryy Guide Guide 1.202, 1.202, issued issued in in February 2005.[ 2005)7] 7) Decommissioning Scenarios Decommissioning The following The followingscenarios scenarioswere wereevaluated evaluated and and are are representative representative of the alternativ alternatives es available to thethe owner: owner:
- 1. DECON: The DECON: The plant's plant's operating operating licenselicense currently currently expiresexpires on on Septembe Septemberr 29, 29, 2026. However, 2026. However, for for purposes purposes of ofthis this study, study, the license is assumed assumed to to be be renewed renewed for an additiona for additionall 20 20 years years (until (until 2046).
2046). The The first scenario assumes first scenario assumes that that an ISFSI is constructe constructed d to to support support continued continued plant plant operation operations andexpanded s and expandedonce once the plant is shut down to accommo plant is shut down to accommodate date any any residual residual spent spentfuel fuel ininthe thepoolpool and and facilitate decontam ination and dismantli decontamination dismantling activities within ng activities within the thefuel fuelbuilding. building. Spent fuel storage operations fuel storage operations continue continue at at the the site until the transfer transfer of of the the fuel fuel to the the DOE DOE is complete, complete, assumed assumed to to bebe inin the the year year2064. 2064.
- 2. Delayed Delayed DECON: DECON:InInthe the second second scenario, scenario,the the unit unit is prepared for is prepared for anan abbreviat abbreviated ed period period of of storage.
storage. The The spent fuel fuel discharge discharged to the storage d the storage pool pool once operations operations cease cease remains in the the poolpool until until itit can can bebe transferre transferred d totoaaDOEDOE facility. facility. Decommi ssioning is Decommissioning is delayed delayed until until the transfer transfer of of the the fuel fuel to to the theDOEDOE is is complete (i.e., complete (i.e., in the year 2064). year 2064). The unit unit is is then thendecommis decommissioned. sioned. 3.3. SAFSTO SAFSTOR: R: The The nuclear nuclear unit is placed placed into into safe-stora safe-storage ge in the the third thirdscenario. scenario. However However,, decommi ssioningisis deferred decommissioning deferred beyond beyond the fuel storage period the fuel period to to the the maximum maximum extent extentpossible; possible; terminatio termination n of ofthe thelicense license would would conclude conclude withinwithin thethe required 60-year required 60-year period. period. As As inin the theDECON DECON scenario, scenario, spent spentfuel fuelisisrelocated relocatedtoto an an ISFSI ISFSI untiluntilititcan canbebetransferre transferred d toto a DOE a DOE facility.Dormanc facility. Dormancy continues y continues followin g the removal following the removal of of spent spent fuelfuel from from the site, timed the site, timed to to allow allow final final 6 U.S. 6 U.s.Code CodeofofFederal FederalRegulations Regulations,, Title Title10, 10,Parts Parts2,2,50, 50,and and51,51,"Decommiss "Decommissioning ioning ofofNuclear NuclearPower Power Reactors," NRC, Reactors," NRC, Federal FederalRegister RegisterVolume Volume61, 61,(p(p39278 39278etetseq.), seq.),July July29, 29,1996 1996 7
"Standard "StandardFormat Formatand andContent ContentofofDecommissi oning Cost Decommissioning CostEstimates Estimatesfor forNuclear NuclearPowerPowerReactors,"
Reactors," Regulatory RegulatoryGuide Guide1.202, 1.202,U.S. U.S.Nuclear NuclearRegulatory RegulatoryCommission Commission, February2005
, February 2005 TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc.
Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev.Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Page Page xxofofxvii xvii decommissioning and decommissioning and license license termination termination to to be completed within be completed within 60 60 years of of final shutdown. final shutdown. Methodology Methodology The methodology The methodologyused usedto to develop developthe the estimates estimates described within this document described within document followsthe follows the basic basic approach originally presented presented in inthe thecost costestimating estimating guidelines guidelines 181[8] developedby developed bythethe Atomic AtomicIndustrial Industrial Forum Forum (now (now Nuclear Nuclear Energy Energy Institute). Institute). This reference describes reference describes aa unit factor factor method method for for determining determining decommissioning decommissioning activity activity costs. TheThe unit factors used in in this this analysis analysisincorporate incorporate site-specific site-specific costs costs and the the latest available information on worker productivity available information on worker productivity in decommissioning. in decommissioning. An activity An activity duration critical path is is used usedto todetermine determinethe thetotal totaldecommissioning decommissioning program schedule. program schedule. The The schedule schedule is is relied relied upon upon inincalculating calculating the thecarrying carryingcosts, costs, which include which include program program management, management, administration, field engineering, equipment rental, andand support support services services suchsuch as as quality qualitycontrol control andandsecurity. security. This Thissystematic systematic approach for approach for assembling decommissioningestimates assembling decommissioning estimatesensures ensuresaa highhigh degree degree of of confidence in confidence in the the reliability reliability of the resulting resulting cost cost estimate. estimate. Contingency Consistent with standardstandard cost cost estimating estimating practice, practice, contingencies contingencies are appliedapplied to to the the decontamination decontamination and and dismantling dismantling costs costs as as"specific "specific provision provision for for unforeseeable unforeseeable elements elements of cost cost within within the the defined defined project project scope, scope, particularly particularly important importantwhere where previous experiencerelating previous experience relatingestimates estimatesand and actual actual costs costs hashas shown shown that that unforeseeable unforeseeable events events whichwhich will will increase increase costscostsarearelikely likelyto to occur."[91 occur."[9] The The costcost elements elements in the the estimates estimates are are based based on onideal idealconditions; conditions; therefore, therefore, the types types of of unforeseeable events that that are arealmost almostcertain certaintotooccur occurinindecommissioning, decommissioning, based basedon on industry industry experience, experience, are are addressed addressed through through aapercentage percentagecontingency contingency applied applied on on aa line-item basis. basis. This contingency contingency factorfactor is is aa nearly universal universal element element in inall alllarge-large-scale construction construction and demolition projects. It demolition projects. It should should bebe noted noted that thatcontingency, contingency, as as used used in in this this analysis, analysis, does does not not account account for for price price escalation and inflation inflation inin the the cost cost of of decommissioning decommissioning over over thethe remaining operating operating lifelife of the station. station. The The use use andandrole roleof ofcontingency contingency within within decommissioning decommissioning estimates is is not not aasafety safety factor factor issue. Safety Safetyfactors factors provide provide additional additional security security and address address situations situations that that may may never never occur. occur. Contingency Contingencyfunds, funds, by bycontrast, contrast,are areexpected expectedtotobe befully fullyexpended expended 8 T.8. LaGuardia T.S. LaGuardiaet etat, "Guidelinesfor aI.,"Guidelines forProducing ProducingCommercial CommercialNuclear NuclearPower PowerPlant PlantDecommissioning Decommissioning Cost Cost Estimates," Estimates,"AIF/NESP-036, AIFINESP-036,May May1986 1986 9 Projectand Project andCost CostEngineers' Engineers'Handbook, Handbook,Second SecondEdition, Edition,American AmericanAssociation AssociationofofCost CostEngineers, Engineers, Marcel MarcelDekker, Dekker,Inc., Inc.,New NewYork, York,NewNewYork, York,p.p.239 239 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Clinton Rev.00 Decomm issioning CostAnalysis Analysis Page Pagexixiof Decommissioning Cost ofxvii xvii throughout the throughout the program. program. Inclusio Inclusion n of contingency is of contingency is necessary necessary to to provide provideassurance assurance that sufficien t funding that sufficient funding will will be be available available to to accomplish accomplishthe the intended intended tasks. tasks. Low-LevelRadioactive Low-Level RadioactiveWaste WasteDisposal Disposal The contaminated The contaminatedand and activated activated material material generated generated in decontamination in the deconta mination and and dismantling of dismantling of aa commercial commercial nuclearnuclear reactor is classifie classified d asas low-leve low-levell (radioac (radioactive) tive) waste, although waste, although not not all of thethe material material is is suitable suitablefor for "shallow "shallow-land" disposal.. With
-land" disposal With the passage of the of the the"Low-L "Low-Levelevel Radioac Radioactive WastePolicy tive Waste PolicyAct"Act"inin1980,11 1980,[10] and 01 and its its Amendmentsof Amendments of 1985,11 1985,[11] 11 thethestates statesbecame ultimately responsible became ultimately responsible for the for the disposition of disposition oflow-level low-levelradioactive radioactivewaste wastegenerated generatedwithin within their their own borders.
borders. With the exception the exception of of Texas Texas (which (whichhas has issued issued aa license license to Waste Control Speciali Specialists for sts for operatio n operation of aof a new facility in Andrew Andrews, s, Texas), Texas), no new compact facilities facilities have been successfully sited, successfully sited, licensed, licensed, and and constructed. constructed. The disposal The disposal facility facility in in Barnwell, Barnwell, South South Carolina Carolina is currently is currentl closed to generato y closed generators rs outside outside the Atlantic Compac t (compri Compact (comprising sing thethe states of of Connect Connecticut, icut, New New Jersey Jersey and South Carolin South Carolina). a). The The comme commercial rcial disposal disposal facility facility on the Hanfor on the Hanford Nuclearr d Nuclea Reserva Reservationtion near Richlan d, Washin Richland, Washington acceptsgton accepts low-lev low-level radioactive el radioact ive waste from from the Northw the Northwest est (Alaska (Alaska,, Hawaii, Hawaii, Idaho, Idaho, Montan Montana, Oregon, Utah, a, Oregon, Utah, Washin Washingtongton and and Wyoming) and Wyoming) and Rocky Rocky Mounta Mountain in (Colora (Colorado, do, Nevada Nevada,, and andNew NewMexico Mexico) Compact
) Compact states.
states. This This leaves leaves EnergyS olutions' disposa EnergySolutions' disposall facility facility in in Clive, Clive, UtahUtah as the the only only availabl availablee option for for the disposal disposal of of the the majority majority of of the thelow-leve low-levell radioact radioactive waste ive waste generate generated d in in decomm issioning Clinton. decommissioning Clinton. For For thethe purpose purpose of of this thisanalysi analysis, s, Exelon Exelon's "Life of
's "Life ofPlant PlantAgreemAgreement" ent" with with EnergyS olutions is EnergySolutions is used used as as thethe basis basis for for estimat estimating ing thethe disposa disposall cost cost forfor the the majority of the radioact ive waste (Class majority of the radioactive waste (Class A[12]). EnergyS A[121). EnergySolutions olutions doesdoes notnot have have aa license license to to dispose dispose of of the the more more highlyhighly radioac radioactive waste (Classe tive waste (Classess B B and andC), C),forfor example example,, generate generated d in in the thedismant dismantling ling of ofthe thereactor reactorvessel.
vessel. As As aa proxy proxy for for future disposal disposal facilities facilities,, waste waste disposal disposal costs costs for for the the higher higher activity activity waste (Class B and waste (Class B and C) are C) are based based upon upon the thelastlastpublishe published rateschedul d rate schedule e forfornon-non-compac compactt waste waste for for the the Barnwe Barnwell ll facility, facility, adjusted adjusted for for escalati escalation of the Atlantic on of the Atlantic Compac Compactt rates. rates. Material Materialexceedin exceeding g Class Class CC limits limits (limited (limited to to material materialclosest closestto tothe thereactor reactorcorecoreand and compris ing comprising aa small small percenta percentage ge of of the the total totalwaste wastevolume) volume)isisgenerall generally notsuitable y not suitable 10 "Low-Lev el Radioactiv 10 "Low-Level Radioactive e Waste WastePolicy PolicyActActofof1980," 1980,"Public PublicLaw Law96-573, 96-573,1980 1980 11 11 "Low-Lev el Radioactiv e Waste "Low-Level Radioactive WastePolicy PolicyAmendme Amendments nts ActActofof1985," 1985,"Public PublicLaw Law99-240, 99-240,1986 1986 12 12 Waste Wasteisisclassified classifiedininaccordanc accordance e with withU.S. U.S.Code Codeof ofFederal FederalRegulatio Regulations, Title10, ns, Title 10,Part Part61.55 61.55 TLG TLGServices, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Page Page xii of xvii xii of xvii for shallow-land for shallow-landdisposal. disposal.This This material material is is packaged packaged in in the the same same multipurpose multipurpose canisters used for canisters for spent fuel storage/transport storage/transport and anddesignated designatedfor forgeologic geologic disposal. A significant A significant portion portion of of the the metallic metallic waste generated during during decommissioning decommissioning may only be only be potentially contaminated by potentially contaminated by radioactive radioactive materials. materials. This This waste waste can can be be surveyed on surveyed on site site or shipped shipped off off site toto licensed licensed facilities facilities for further further analysis, analysis, for for processing and/or processing and/or for for conditioning/recovery. conditioning/recovery. ReductionReduction in in the the volume volume of oflow-level low-level radioactive waste waste requiring requiring disposal disposal in in aalicensed licensedlow-level low-level radioactive radioactive waste waste disposal facility disposal facility can can be be accomplished accomplished through through aa variety variety of of methods, methods, including including analyses and surveys or decontamination to eliminate the portion of waste waste that doesdoes not require disposal not disposal as radioactive radioactive waste, waste, compaction, compaction, incineration or metal metal melt.melt. The estimates reflect The reflect the the savings savings from from waste waste recovery/volume recovery/volume reduction. High-Level Radioactive High-Level Radioactive WasteWaste Management Management Congress passedpassed the the"Nuclear "NuclearWasteWastePolicy PolicyAct" Act"[131 [13] (NWPA) (NWPA)inin1982, 1982, assigning assigning the responsibility responsibility for for disposal disposal of of the nuclear fuel the spent nuclear fuel created created by by thethecommercial commercial nuclear generating plants nuclear generating plants to to the theDOE. DOE. Two Two permanent permanent disposal disposal facilities facilities werewere envisioned, envisioned, as well as an interim interim storage storagefacility. facility. ToTo recover recover thethe cost, cost, the the legislation legislation created a Nuclear Nuclear Waste Waste Fund Fund through through which which money money is is collected collected from from the sale sale of of electricity electricity generated generated by by the power power plants. plants. TheThe NWPA, NWPA, along along with with thethe individual individual disposal contracts disposal contracts with the utilities, utilities, specified specified that that thethe DOE DOE was was toto begin begin accepting accepting spent fuel by January January31, 31, 1998. 1998. Since Since the original original legislation, legislation, the the DOE DOE has has announced announced several several delays delays in the the program program schedule. By January 1998, 1998, the the DOE DOE had had failed failed toto accept accept any anyspent spentfuel fueloror high level level waste, waste, asasrequired required by the the NWPA NWPA and utility contracts. contracts. Delays Delays continue continue
- and, and, as as aa result, result, generators generators have have initiated initiated legal legal action action against against thethe DOEDOE in in anan attempt attemptto toobtain obtaincompensation compensationfor forDOE's DOE'sbreach breach ofof contract.1141 contracUl4] For purposes purposesof ofthis this analysis, acceptance acceptance of of commercial commercial spent fuel fuel by by thethe DOE DOE is assumed assumed to to begin begin in in 2025.
2025. Once Once an interim interim storage storage or ordisposal disposalfacility facilityisisoperational, operational,fuel fuelacceptance acceptancewill willbe be prioritized prioritized and and spent spent fuel fuel assemblies assemblies will will need need toto meet meet certain certainacceptance acceptance criteria, criteria, including including heat output.output. These These conditions conditions require that that the thefuelfuel discharged discharged upon upon the the 13 13 "NuclearWaste "Nuclear WastePolicy PolicyAct Act of of 1982 1982 and and Amendments," Amendments,"U.S. U.s.Department DepartmentofofEnergy's Energy'sOffice OfficeofofCivilian Civilian Radioactive Radioactive Management, Management, 19821982 14 14 Settlement: Settlement:Exelon Exelon and and the theU.S. U.s.Department Justice,ininclose DepartmentofofJustice, closeconsultation consultationwith withthe theDOE, DOE, under underwhich whichthe thegovernment governmentwill willreimburse reimburseExelon Exelonfor forcosts costsassociated associatedwithwithstorage storageofofspent spent fuel fuel at atthe thecompany's company's nuclear nuclearstations stationspending pendingDOEDOEfulfilling fulfillingits itscontractual contractualobligation obligationtotoaccept accept commercial commercial spent spent nuclear nuclear fuel. fuel. Additional Additional amounts amounts reimbursed reimbursedannually annuallyforforfuture futurecosts. costs.August August 5, 2004 5,2004 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640 -006,Rev. Rev.00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Page Pagexiii xiiiof ofxvii xvii cessationof cessation ofoperations operationsbe beactively activelycooledcooledand andstored storedfor fora aminimum minimumperiod periodat at the the generati ng generating site site prior transfer (a to transfer (a minimum minimum of of five five years as as defined defined in in 10CFR§ 10CFR§961 961 forstandard for standard fuel). fuel).As Assuch, such,thethe NRC NRCrequires requiresthat that licensees licensees establish establish aa program program to to manageand manage and provide providefunding fundingfor forthe the management managementofofall allirradiated irradiatedfuel fuel atat the the reactor until reactor until title title ofof the the fuel fuel is is transferred transferred to to the Secretar Secretaryy of of Energy, Energy, pursuant pursuant to to 10CFR§ 50.54(b b).[151 10CFR§50.54(bb)JI5] This funding This funding requirement requirement is isfulfilled fulfilledthrough through inclusion inclusion of of certain cost certain cost elements elements in the the decomm decommissioning issioning estimates, estimates, for for example example,, associat associated ed with the isolation with the isolation and continu ed continued operatio operationn of of the the plant's fuel fuel storage storage pool pool and/or and/or ISFSI. ISFSI. At shutdow At shutdown, n, the the plant's plant's storage storage pool pool is is expecte expected d toto contain contain freshly freshly discharg discharged ed assemblies from assemblies from the the most most recent refuelin refuelingg cycles, cycles, as well as well as the final reactor final reactor core. core. Within five Within five and and one-half one-half years years ofof final final shutdown, shutdown, the the spent fuel in the the storage storage pool pool is expected is expected to to be be transferred transferred to to the theISFSI ISFSI(DECON(DECONand andSAFSTO SAFSTOR scenarios). R scenarios). Once Once the storage the storage poolpool is is emptied emptied,, the fuel fuel building building can be either either deconta decontaminated minated and and dismantled or dismantled or prepare prepared d for for long-ter long-term m storage. storage. The The pool pool is is kept operatio operational in nal in the the Delayed DECON Delayed DECON scenario untilscenario until the transfer transferto to the theDOEDOE can canbe be complet completed.ed. The DOE's The DOE's generato generatorr allocatio n/receipt schedules allocation/receipt schedules are are based based uponupon the oldest oldest fuelfuel receivin g the receiving the highesthighest priority. priority. With a large large fleet fleet of of reactors reactors,, Exelon Exelon is ableable to to re-re-assign allocatio assign allocations ns between between its its units to to minimiz minimize on-site storage e on-site storage costs. costs. Assumi Assuming ng spent spent fuel fuel from from the the older units is given older units given priority priority and and with aa maximu maximum m rate of of transfer transfer of of 3,000 3,000 metric metric tonstons ofof uranium uranium (MTU)/ (MTU)/year), year), the assemblies the assemblies residing at at Clinton Clinton at the the time time of ofshutdow shutdown n would would be be schedul scheduled ed forfor pickup pickup in in the theyears years2063 2063 and and 2064 2064 (assumi (assuming ng the cessatio cessation n of plant operatiooperations 2046). This equates ns in 2046). equates to to 6666 multi-pu rpose canisters (at multi-purpose canisters (at 89 assemblies89 assembl ies perpercanister) canister). . It It is is expecte expected d that that an anISFSI, ISFSI, operate operated d under under aaPart Part5050Genera General License (in l License (in accordan ce with accordance with 10 10CFRCFR72, 72,Subpart SubpartKK[161), [16]), will will bebe constructed constructed to supportsupportcontinue continued d plant plant operatio operations.ns. The The facility facility isisassumed assumedtotobe beexpande expanded following the cessation d following the cessation of of plant operatio ns to support plant operations to supportfuture futuredecomm issioning operatio decommissioning operations. Assuch, ns. As such, the thefuel fuel(in (in the the DECON DECON and and SAFSTO SAFSTOR R scenario scenarios) s) is package packaged d for interim storage at interim storage atthe theISFSI. ISFSI. Exelon' Exelon'ss strongly strongly held held position position is is that the the DOEDOE has hasaacontraccontractual obligation tual obligati on to to accept Clinton 's fuel in accept Clinton's fuel in a timely manne a timely manner r and andconsist consistentent withwith itsitscontrac contract t commit ments. No commitments. No assumption assumptionmade made in in this this study study should should be be interpre interpreted to ted to be be inconsis inconsistenttent with with this this claim. claim. Howeve However, r, atat this thistime, time,includin including g thethecost costofofstoring storing spent spent fuel fuel inin this thisstudy studyisisthe themostmostreasona reasonable approach ble approac because itit insures h because insures the the 15 U.S. 15 U.S. Code Code ofof Federal Federal Regulatio ns, Title Regulations, Title10,10,Part Part50, 50,"Domestic "DomesticLicensing LicensingofofProductio Production and n and Utilization UtilizationFacilities, Facilities,"" Subpart Subpart 5454(bb), (bb),"Conditio "Conditionsns ofofLicenses" Licenses" 16 16 U.S. U.s.Code Code of of Federal Federal Regulatio ns, Title Regulations, Title10,10,Part Part72, 72,Subpart SubpartK,K,"General "GeneralLicense Licensefor forStorage Storageofof Spent SpentFuel FuelatatPower PowerReactor ReactorSites." Sites." TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev.00 Decomm issioning Decommissioning Cost CostAnalysis Analysis Page Pagexivxivof ofxvii xvii availability of availability ofsufficient sufficientdecommissioning decommissioningfunds fundsatatthetheend endof ofthe thestation's station's life life ififthe the DOE has DOE has not metnot met its its contractual contractual obligation obligation to to take the fuel. Site Restoration Site Restoration The efficient The efficientremovalremovalofofthe thecontaminated contaminatedmaterials materialsatatthe the site site will will result result in in damageto damage to many many of of the the site site structur structures. Blasting,, coring, es. Blasting coring, drilling, and the drilling, and the other other decontamination activitie decontamination activitiess will will substantially substantially damage damage power power blockblock structur structures, es, potentially weakening potentially weakening the the footings footings and and structural supports.. Prompt structural supports Prompt demoliti demolition once on once the license the license is is terminated terminated is clearly the most appropr appropriate and cost-effe iate and cost-effective option. It ctive option. It is unreasonable is unreasonable to to anticipate anticipate thatthat these structur structures would be repaired and preserve es would preservedd after the radiolo after gical contamination radiological contaminationisis removed. removed.The The costcost to dismantle to disman site tle site structure s with structures with a work a work force force already already mobilize mobilized more efficient d is more efficient and less costly costly than than if the if the process process were were deferred. deferred. Experience Experienceat at shutdown shutdown generating stations generating stations has shown shown that plant that plant facilitie facilitiess quickly quickly degrade degrade without without mainten maintenance, adding addition ance, adding additional al expense and creating potentia expense potentiall hazards hazards to to the thepublic publicandandthethedemoliti demolition work on work force.force. Consequently,this Consequently, this analysis analysis assumes assumes thatthat non-ess non-essential ential site structures site structur within the es within the restricted access restricted access area are are removed removed to aa nominal nominal depthdepth of of three three feet feet below below the local local grade level grade level wherever wherever possible. possible. The site is then graded graded andand stabilize stabilized. d. Summary Summary The The costs costs to to decomm ission Clinton decommission Clinton were were evaluate evaluated d forforseveral severaldecommdecommissioning issioning scenari os, incorpo scenarios, incorporating the rating the attributes attributes of of both both the theDECON DECON and andSAFSTSAFSTOR OR decomm issioningalternatives. decommissioning alternatives. Regardless Regardless of of the timing timing of of the thedecomm decommissioning issioning activitie activities, s, the estimate estimatess assume assume the the eventua eventuall removal removal of all the contami contaminated nated and and activate activated d plant plant compon components ents andand structural structural material materials, such that s, such that the thefacility facility operator operator may may then have have unrestri cted use unrestricted use ofof the the site site with with no no further further requirem requirement for an ent for an operatin g operating license. Delayed decommissioning license. Delayed decommissioningisisinitiated initiatedafterafter the the spent fuel fuel hashas been been removed removed from the site site and andisisaccompl accomplished withinthe ished within the60-year 60-yearperiodperiodrequired required by current NRC by current NRC regulatio regulations. ns. In the the interim, interim, the the spent spentfuelfuel remains remainsin instorage storageat atthe the site site until until such suchtime timethat thatthe thetransfer transfer totoa DOE a DOEfacility facilitycancanbebecomplet completed. Once ed. Once the the transfer is complet e, the transfer is complete, thestorage storagefacilities facilitiesarearealso alsodecomm decommissioned. issioned. The The scenario scenarios s analyzed analyzed for for the the purpose purpose of of generati generating the estimate ng the estimates s arearedescribe described d inin Section Section 2. The The assump tions are assumptions are presente presented d inin Section Section 3, 3, along along with withschedul schedules es of of annual expendi tures. The major annual expenditures. The major cost contribu cost contributors areidentifie tors are identified d ininSection Section6,6, with with detailed detailed activity activity costs, costs, waste waste volume volumes, s, and andassociat associated manpower ed manpow requirements er requirem ents delineat delineateded in inAppend Appendices ices C,C, D,D, and and E.E. Cost Costsummar summaries forthe ies for thevarious variousscenario scenarios s are are provided providedat atthetheendendofofthis thissection sectionforforthe themajor majorcostcostcompon components. ents. TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStationStation Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissi oning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Page Page xv xvof ofxvii xvii
SUMMARY
OF
SUMMARY
OFDECOMMISSIONING DECOMMISSIONING COST COSTELEMENTS ELEMENTS DECON DECON (thousands of 2012 (thousands 2012 dollars) dollars) Cost Element Tota Decontamination Decontamination 25,126 25,126 Removal Removal I 191,180 191,180 Packaging Packagi:gE: 27,71! 27,715 Trans ortation Transportation 1322 13 229 Waste Disposal ____VVasteDis2osal I 80,39 80,391 Off-site VV Off-site Waste Processin aste Processing 14,464 Pro am Mana Program ement [1] Management X11 I 421,449 Sent Fuel Spent FuelPoolPool Isolation Isolation I 12,176 Spent Fuel (Direct Direct Costs Costs)[21[2] 144,449 Insurance and ,
~I_nsurance and Regulatory Re@!atoryFees Fees I 19,48~_
19,482 Energy I1 19,467 Characterization and Qharacterization andLicensing Licensing Surve;ys urve^ s 27,911 Pro Propertyert Taxes Taxes I 44,649 Miscellane Miscellaneous ous Equipment i I 6,738 Site O&M 3,397 I I Total [3] I 1,051,824 Cost Element Cost Element Total
- NRC NRC License Terminatio Termination n 732,894 Spent Spent FuelFuel Manageme Management nt 217,632 Site Site Restoration Restoration 101,298 Total Total[31[3] ! 1051,824
[11[I] Includes Includes security securityand andengineering engineeringcosts costs [21[2] Excludes program Excludes programmanagement managementcosts costs(staffing) (staffing)but butincludes includescosts costsfor forspent spent fuel loading/transfer/spent fuel fuelloading/transferlspent fuelpool poolO&M O&Mand andEPEPfees fees [31[3] Columns Columnsmay maynot notadd adddue dueto torounding rounding TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev.00 Decommis sioningCost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Page Pagexvi xviof ofxvii xvii
SUMMARY
OF
SUMMARY
OFDECOMMISSIONING DECOMMISSIONINGCOST COSTELEMENTS ELEMENTS DELAYEDDECON DELAYED DECON (thousands of 2012 (thousands 2012 dollars) dollars) Cost Element Cost Element ! Total Total Decontamination Decontamination 32,855 32,855 Removal Removal 185,721 185,721 Packaging Packaging i 17,477 17,477 Trans ortation Transportation I 9,194 9,194 I Waste Disposal Waste 42,17:£ 42,172 1, Off-site Waste Off-site Wast e Processing I17,24 Processing 17,2400 Pro am Mana Program Managementement [1] [ll I 578,327 went Fuel Spent Fuel Pool Pool Isolation i 12,176 Spent Fuel (Direct Costs) [2] irect Costs) [2] 74,086 Insurance and __Ip.surl!!!.~~~_~~latory Regulator y Fees 1 27,942._- Energy 1 31,969 Character
~haracterization ization and Licensing Surveys 1 29,549 Property Property TaxesTaxes 53,473 Miscellan Miscellaneous eousE ui ment Equipment 13,600 Site Site O&M O&M 9,718 Total [3] 1,135,501 Cost Cost Element Element Total Total NRC NRC License Terminati Termination on 666,212 S ent Fuel Mana Sent Fuel Mana ement ement 367,871 Site ite Restoratio Restoration n 101,418 Total [31 1,135,501 1,135, 501 (11[IJ Includes Includessecurity securityand andengineering engineeringcosts costs
[21[2J Excludes Excludesprogram programmanagemen management t costs costs(staffing) (staffing)but butincludes includescosts costsfor forspent spent fuel loading/transfer/spent fuel fuelloadingitransferispent fuelpool poolO&MO&MandandEPEPfees fees 131[3J Columns Columnsmay maynot notaddadddue duetotorounding rounding TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc.Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev.00 DecommissioningCost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Page Pagexvii xviiof ofxvii xvii
SUMMARY
OF
SUMMARY
OFDECOMMISSIONING DECOMMISSIONINGCOST COSTELEMENTS ELEMENTS SAFSTOR SAFSTOR (thousands of 2012 (thousands 2012 dollars) dollars) Cost Element I Cost Element Total Total Decontamination Decontamination 32,644 32,644 Removal Removal 187'1~ 187,10991 Packa ing Packaging 16,3 16,349 Transporta Trans~~rtation tion I 7,989 7,989 Waste Disposal Waste I 38,122 38,122 Waste Processing Off-site Waste Processin 17,343 17,343 Program Manageme Program Management nt [1][1] 609,045 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation I 12,176 12,1761 Sent Fuel Spent Fuel(Direct (DirectCosts) Costs)[21 [2] 140,812 Insurance and Regulatory f~!lsl!~~p.ce and R~_@latory': Fees 57,273 Ener Energy 38,925 Characterization and Licensin Characterization Licensil!.g Surveys 29,549 Property Property TaxesTaxes 92,510 26'1~ Miscellane Miscellaneous ousEquipment E ui ment 26,121 Site O&M O&M 22,6 22,606
. Total Total[31[3] 1,328,5721 Cost Element I Total t NRC NRC License Terminatio S ent Fuel Mana Spent Fuel Management Termination ement n
I 949,951 277,213 Site Site Restoration Restoration 101,408 Total [3] I 1,328,572 [1][I] Includes Includessecurity securityand andengineering engineeringcosts costs [21[2] Excludes Excludesprogram programmanagement managementcosts costs(staffing) (staffing)but butincludes includescosts costsfor forspent spent fuel loading/transfer/spent fuel fuelloading/transferlspent fuelpool poolO&M O&Mand andEPEPfees fees [3][3] Columns Columnsmay maynot notadd adddue duetotorounding rounding TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc.Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev.Rev. 00 Decommissioning Decommissioning Cost CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 1,1, Page Page 11 of of 88
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 1. INTRODUCTION This report This report presents presents estimates estimates of of the the cost cost totodecommission decommission the the Clinton Clinton Power Power Station (Clinton), for the scenarios Station (Clinton), for the scenarios described described in Section 2, following a scheduled Section 2, following a scheduled cessation of cessation of plant plant operations.
operations. The The analysis analysis relies reliesupon uponsite-specific, site-specific, technical technical information from information from an earlier earlier evaluation evaluationprepared preparedinin 2007,111 2007,[1] for AmerGen Energy, Energy, LLC,and LLC, and updated updated to to reflect reflect current current assumptions pertaining pertaining to to the the disposition disposition of of the nuclear unit nuclear unit and and relevant relevant industry industry experience experience in undertaking undertaking suchsuch projects. projects. In 2008, the 2008, the operating license license waswas amended amended to to reflect reflect Exelon Exelon Generation Generation Company Company LLC (Exelon) LLC (Exelon)as as the the authorized licensee for authorized licensee for the station. station. Therefore, Therefore, the the updated updated estimates are designed designed to provide provide Exelon with sufficient information to assess their their financial obligations, financial obligations,asas they they pertain pertain to to the the eventual eventualdecommissioning decommissioning of of the nuclear station. nuclear station. It is is not not aa detailed detailedengineering engineering document, document, butbut aa financial financial analysis analysis prepared in advance prepared advance of of the the detailed engineering that detailed engineering that will will be required to carry carry outout the decommissioning 1.1 OBJE CTIVES OF STUDY OBJECTIVES The objectives objectives of of this this study are to to prepare prepare comprehensive comprehensive estimates estimates of of the the cost cost to decommission decommission Clinton, Clinton, to to provide provide aa sequence sequence or or schedule schedule for for the the associated activities, and associated activities, and to develop develop waste waste stream stream projections projections from from the the decontamination decontamination and and dismantling activities. activities. The The plant's plant's operating operatinglicenselicense currently expires currently expires on on September September29, 29, 2026. 2026. However, However, for purposes of of this study, study, the license license is assumed assumed to to be be renewed for an additional additional 20 20 years years (until (until2046). 2046). 1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION Clinton is located in east central central Illinois, Illinois, approximately approximately 60 60 miles miles northeast northeastof of Springfield. Springfield. The The station is comprised comprised of a singlesingle boiling boiling water reactor reactor withwith supporting supporting facilities. facilities. The The Nuclear Nuclear SteamSteamSupply SupplySystem System(NSSS) (NSSS)consists consistsofofaaBWR/6 BWR/6 boiling boiling water water reactor reactor system system designed designed by by General General Electric. Electric. The The reactor reactor recirculation recirculation system system is is comprised comprised of the reactor reactor vessel vessel and and two two recirculation recirculation pump pump loops loops external external to to the the reactor reactor vessel vessel which which provides provides thethe driving driving flow flow ofof water water to to the thereactor reactor vessel vessel jet jet pumps. pumps. Each Eachexternal externallooploopcontains containsone onehigh-capacity, high-capacity,motor-driven motor-driven recirculation recirculation pump pump and and threethreemotor-operated motor-operated gate gate valves valves for for pump pump maintenance. maintenance. The The recirculation recirculation loopsloops are aa part partofofthe the nuclear nuclearsystem systemprocess process barrier barrier and andare arelocated located inside inside the thecontainment containmentstructure. structure.TheThedesign designreactor reactor thermal thermal power power level level isis3473 3473Megawatts Megawattsthermalthermal(MWt). (MWt).The Thecorresponding corresponding net netelectrical electricaloutput outputisisapproximately approximately1138.5 1138.5Megawatts Megawattselectric electric(MWe). (MWe). TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev.00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 1,1,Page Page 22of of88 The BWR-Mark The BWR-MarkIII IIIcontainment containmentstructure structure at Clinton consists at Clinton consists of of aa lined, lined, reinforcedconcrete reinforced concretecylinder cylinderwith withaa hemispherical hemispherical domed domed roof and a flat base roof and a flat base slab. The drywell slab. The drywell consists consists of ofaa cylindrical cylindricalreinforced reinforcedconcrete concretestructure structure thatthat surrounds the surrounds the reactor vessel. vessel. The The lower lower portion portion of of the drywell drywell is submerg submerged ed inin the the suppression suppression pool. pool. The The drywell drywell and and suppress suppression pool are ion pool are connect connected by ed by three rows three rows of of circular circular vents vents which which are are located located below belowthe the normal normal waterwater level level ofof the suppress ion the suppression pool. pool. Heat produced Heat produced in in the reactor reactor is is converte converted to electrica d to electricall energy energy by by the the power power convers conversion ionsystem. system. A A turbine-generator turbine-generator system converts converts the the thermal energy energy of the of the steam steam produce producedd in in the reactor into mechan mechanical ical shaft powerpower and then then into electrica into electricall energy. energy. The turbine turbine consists consists of of one one high-pre high-pressure, double-flow ssure, double-f low turbine element turbine element,, and and twotwo double- flow, low-pre double-flow, low-pressure turbine elements ssure turbine elements all all aligned in tandem. aligned in tandem. The The generat generator or is driven driven at 18001800 rpm and rated rated at at 1100 1100 MVA. MV Theexhaust A. The exhaust steam steam from from the the turbine turbine is condens condensed ed and deaerate deaerated in d in thethe main condenser. condenser. The heat The heat rejected rejected to to the themain maincondens condenser er isis removed removed by by the the circulating water system. circulating system. The circulati The circulating ng water system provide providess the sink required the heat sink required for for removal removal of of waste heat in in the the power power plant's plant's thermal thermalcycle.cycle. The The system system has has thetheprincipa principal l function of function of removing removing heat heat by by absorbing absorbing this energy in the main this energy main condens condenser. er. Water Water is is withdra withdrawn wn from from LakeLake Clinton Clinton via via the intake tunnels the intake tunnels by by thethe circulat ing water circulating water pumps. Mterpumps. After passing passing through through the plant plant condens condensers, the ers, the water water is is routed routed through throughthe the3.43.4mile milelong long discharg discharge flume back e flume back to to the the lake. lake. 1.3 1.3 REGUL REGULATORY ATORY GUIDA GUIDANCE NCE The The Nuclear Nuclear RegulatRegulatoryory Commis Commission sion (NRC (NRC or or Commis Commission) sion) provided initial initial decomm decommissioning issioningrequirements requirementsinin its rule "Gener its rule "General Requirements al Requirements for for Decomm issionin Decommissioningg Nuclear Nuclear Facilitie Facilities," s," issued in in June June1988.[21 1988,[21** This rule set This rule set forth forth financia financial l criteria criteriaforfordecomm issioning licensed decommissioning licensednuclear nuclearpower powerfacilities facilities.. The The regulati regulation on addresse addressed d decomm issioning planning decommissioning planning needs,needs, timing, timing, funding funding methods methods,, and and environm environmentalental review review requirem requirements. ents. The The intent intentof ofthe the rule rulewaswas to ensure that decomm to ensure that decommissioning issionin g would would be be accomp accomplished lished in in aa safe safeandandtimely timely manner manner and and that thatadequa adequate te funds funds would would be beavailab available le forfor this thispurpose purpose. . Subsequ Subsequent ent toto the therule, rule,thetheNRCNRCissuedissuedRegulat Regulatory ory GuideGuide1.159, 1.159,"Assurin "Assuring g the the Availab ility ofofFunds Availability Fundsfor forDecomm Decommissioning NuclearReactor issioning Nuclear Reactors,[31" which s,[3]" which provide providedd addition additional al guidanc guidancee to to thethe licensee licenseess of of nuclear nuclear facilitie facilitiess on on the the financia l method financial methodss accepta acceptable ble toto thethe NRCNRC staff staff forfor comply complying ing withwith the the require requirementsments of of the the rule. rule. TheTheregulato regulatory guideaddress ry guide addressed the ed the funding funding
* *Annotated Annotatedreferences referencesfor forcitations citationsininSections Sections1-6 1-6are areprovided providedininSection Section7.7.
TLG TLGServices, Services,Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Section Section 1,1, Page Page 33 of of 88 requirements andrequirements provided guidance and providedon the content guidance and form on the content of the and form financial of the financial assurance mechanisms indicated in the rule. assurance The rule defined three decommissioning The alternatives as being decommissioning alternatives being acceptable acceptable to the NRC: DECON, the NRC: DECON, SAFSTOR, SAFSTOR,and and ENTOMB. ENTOMB. The The DECON DECON alternative alternative assumes that assumes that anyany contaminated contaminated or activatedactivated portion portion of of the the plant's systems, systems, structures, and facilities are removed or or decontaminated decontaminated to to levels levelsthat that permit permit the site to be released for for unrestricted use shortly after the the cessation cessation of of plant plant operations. The The rule rule also placed placed limits on the time allowed time allowed to complete complete the decommissioning process. decommissioning process. ForFor SAFSTOR, SAFSTOR,the the process process is is restricted in in overall overall duration to duration to 6060 years, years, unless unless itit can can be be shown shown that that aa longer longer duration duration is is necessary to necessary to protect protect public public health and and safety. safety. The The guidelines guidelinesfor forENTOMB ENTOMB are similar, providing providing thethe NRC NRC with with both both sufficient sufficient leverage leverage and andflexibility flexibility to to ensure that these ensure these deferred deferred options options are are only only usedused in in situations where it is situations where reasonable and reasonable and consistent consistent withwith thethedefinition definition of ofdecommissioning. decommissioning. At the the conclusion of a conclusion of a 60-year60-year dormancy period (or longer for ENTOMB ENTOMB if the NRC NRC approves such approves such a case), case), the site would would still still require require significant significant remediation remediation to to meet the unrestricted unrestricted release release limits limits forfor license license termination. termination. The ENTOMB alternative has not ENTOMB alternative not been been viewed viewed as as aa viable viable option option forfor power power reactors reactors due due to to the the significant significant time time required required to to isolate isolate the thelong-lived long-lived radionuclides radionuclides for for decay decay to permissible permissible levels. levels. However, However, with with rulemaking rule making permitting permitting the controlled release of controlled release of aa site, the the NRC NRC has has re-evaluated re-evaluated this this alternative.[4] alternative,[4] The resulting feasibility study, based feasibility study, based upon upon an assessment assessment by by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, concluded concludedthat that the method method did did have have conditional conditional meritmerit for for some, some, if notnot most, most, reactors. reactors. However, However, the staff also the staff also found that that additional rule making would be needed before this option could be additional rulemaking would be needed before this option could be treated treated asas aa generic generic alternative. alternative.The TheNRC NRC had hadconsidered considered rulemaking rulemaking to to alter alter the 60-year 60-year time time for for completing completing decommissioning decommissioning and and to clarify clarify the use use ofof engineered barriers barriersfor forreactor reactorentombments.[51 entombments,[5] However, However, the NRC's NRC's staffstaff has recommended recommended that that rulemaking rule making be be deferred, deferred, basedbased upon uponseveral severalfactors, factors, e.g., no licensee licensee has committed committed to pursuing pursuing the the entombment entombment option, option, the the unresolved unresolved issuesissues associated associated withwith the the disposition disposition of ofgreater-than-Class greater-than-Class CC material (GTCC), (GTCC), and and thethe NRC's current priorities, NRC's current priorities, at at least until until after after the the additional research research studies studies are arecomplete. complete.The TheCommission Commission concurred concurred with with the the staffs staffsrecommendation. recommendation. The The NRCNRC published published amendments amendments to to its itsdecommissioning decommissioning regulations regulations in in 1996.[6] 1996,[6] When When the regulations regulations were were originally originally adopted adopted in in 1988, 1988, itit was was assumed assumed thatthatthe themajority majorityofoflicensees licenseeswould woulddecommission decommission at at the theend endof ofthe the facility's facility's operating operating licensed licensed life.life. Since Since that that time, time, several severallicensees licensees permanently permanently and and prematurely prematurely ceasedceased operations. operations. Exemptions Exemptions from from certain certain operating operating requirements requirements were were required required once once the reactor reactor was was defueled defueled to to TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 1, 1, Page 44 of Page of 88 facilitate the facilitate the decommissioning. decommissioning. Each case case waswas handled individually individually,, without clearly defined clearly defined genericgeneric requirements. requirements. The NRC The NRC amended amended the the decommissioningregulations decommissioning regulationsinin 1996 1996 to clarify ambiguities to clarify ambiguities and and codify codify proceduresand procedures and terminology terminologyasas aa means means of ofenhancing enhancing efficiency efficiency and and uniformity in uniformity in the decommissi decommissioning oning process. process. The The newnew amendment amendments allow for s allow for greater public greater public participation participation and and better define the transition better define transition processprocess from from operations to decommissio operations decommissioning. ning. Under the revised Under revised regulations, regulations, licensees licensees will will submit submit written written certification certification to to the NRC the NRC within 30 days days after after the the decision decision to to cease cease operations. operations. Certification Certification will also will also be be required once once the fuel is permanently permanently removed removed from from the reactorreactor vessel. Submittal of these notices notices will will entitle the licensee licensee to aa fee fee reduction reduction and eliminate and eliminate the the obligation obligation to to follow follow certain certain requiremen requirements needed only ts needed only during operation during operation of of the reactor. reactor. Within Within two two years years of of submitting submitting notice notice of of permanent cessation of operations,operations, the the licensee licensee is required is required to to submit a Post-Post-Shutdown Decommiss Shutdown Decommissioning ioningActivities Activities Report Report (PSDAR) (PSDAR)to to the NRC.NRC. The The PSDAR describes PSDAR describes the the planned planned decommiss decommissioning activities, the associated ioning activities, associated sequence and schedule, and and an an estimate estimateofofexpected expectedcosts.costs. Prior Priorto tocompleting completing decommissi decommissioning,oning,the the licensee licensee isis required required to to submit applications to the the NRCNRC to terminate the license, to terminate the license, which will which will include include aa License License Terminatio Termination Plan n Plan (LTP). 1.3.1 Nuclear Nuclear Waste WastePolicyPolicyAct Act Congress passedpassed the the"Nuclear "NuclearWaste WastePolicyPolicy Act"Act"[7] (NWPA) in [7] (NWPA) in 1982, 1982, assigning assigning the responsibil responsibility ity for disposal of for disposal of thethe spent spent nuclear nuclear fuel fuel created by by the commercial commercial nuclear generating generating plants plants to to the theDOE. DOE. Two Two* permanent permanent disposaldisposal facilities facilities were were envisioned, envisioned, as well as an as well an interim interim storage facility. facility. To recover recover the cost, the legislation legislation created created aa Nuclear Nuclear Waste Waste Fund Fund through through which which moneymoney is collected collected from from the the salesale of of electricity generated electricity generated by by the power power plants. plants. NWPA, NWPA, along along with with the the individual individual disposal disposal contracts with the utilities, utilities, specified specified that that thethe DOEDOE was was toto begin begin accepting accepting spent spent fuel fuel byby January January31, 31,1998. 1998. Since Since thethe original original legislation, legislation, thethe DOE DOE has hasannounced announced several several delays delays in the program schedule. in the program schedule. By By January January 1998, 1998, the the DOEDOE had hadfailed failedtoto initiate initiate thethe disposal disposal of of spent spent nuclear nuclear fuel fuel andand high high level level waste, waste, as as required by the NWPA required by the NWPA and utility and utility contracts. contracts. Delays Delays continue continue and, and, as asaa result, result, generators generators have have initiated legal action action against the the DOEDOE in in anan attempt attempt to to resolve resolve the theimpasse.[8] impasse.lS] For For purposes purposes of of this thisanalysis, analysis, acceptance acceptance of ofcommercial commercial spentspentfuelfuel byby the the DOE DOE is is assumed assumedto tobegin beginin in 2025. 2025. TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev.Rev. 00 Decommissi oning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 1,1,Page Page 55 ofof 88 Once an interim storage Once an interimor disposa storage l orfacility disposal is facility is operational, operati onal, fuel fuel acceptancewill acceptance willbebeprioritized prioritizedand and spent spent fuel assemblies will fuel assemblies will need to meet certain meet certain acceptanc acceptance e criteria, criteria, including including heat output. These heat output. These conditionsrequire conditions requirethat that the the fuel fuel discharge dischargedd upon upon the cessation of the cessation operations be operations be actively activelycooled cooledand andstored stored for a minimum periodat for a minimum period at the the generating site prior to transfer generating transfer (a (a minimum minimum of of five five years as defined in 10CFR§961forforstandard 10CFR§961 standardfuel). fuel).As Assuch, such, the NRC requires the NRC requires that licensees establish aa program licensees establish program to manage and provide to manage provide funding funding for for the management of management of all all irradiated irradiated fuel fuel at at the reactor until title of of the fuel is transferred to transferred to the the Secretary of Secretary of Energy, Energy, pursuant pursuant to to 10CFR§50.54(bb).[91 This 10CFR§50.54(bb).l9] This funding funding requireme requirement fulfilled through nt is fulfilled through inclusion of inclusion of certain certain costcost elements in in the thedecommis decommissioning estimates, sioning estimates, for example, for example, associated associated with with the the isolation and continuedcontinued operation operation of of the plant's plant's fuel fuel storage storage poolpool and/or ISFSI. At shutdown, At shutdown, the plant'splant's storage storage pool pool isis expected expected to to contain contain freshly freshly discharged assemblies from the most most recent recent refueling refueling cycles, cycles, as wellwell asas the final reactor reactor core. core. Within Within five five and and one-half one-half years years ofof final final shutdown, shutdown, the spent spent fuel fuel in in the the storage storage poolpool isis expected expected to to be be transferred transferred to to the the ISFSI (DECON ISFSI (DECON and SAFSTOR SAFSTOR scenarios) scenarios). . OnceOnce the storage storage pool pool isis emptied, emptied, the the fuel fuel building building can can be be either eitherdecontam decontaminated inated and and dismantle dismantledd or or prepared prepared for for long-term long-term storage. storage. The The poolpool is kept is kept operationa operationall in the Delayed Delayed DECONDECON scenarioscenario untiluntil the the transfer to to the the DOE can be be completed. completed. The DOE's DOE's generator generator allocation/ receipt schedules allocation/receipt schedules are are based upon upon the the oldest fuel receiving receiving the highest priority.priority. With With aa large large fleet fleet of of reactors, reactors, Exelon Exelon is ableable toto re-assign re-assign allocations allocations between between its units unitstotominimize minimize on-site storage costs. costs. Assuming spent spent fuel fuel from from the the older older units unitsisisgiven given priority and with a maximum priority and with a maximum rate rateofoftransfer transferofof3,0003,000 metric metric tonstons ofof uranium uranium (MTU)/yea (MTU)/year), r), the assemblies residing at Clinton at at the the time time ofof shutdown shutdown wouldwould be scheduled for pickup for pickup in the the years years 2063 2063 andand20642064 (assuming (assuming the cessation cessation of of plant plant operations operations in in2046). 2046). This This equates equates to to 66 66 multi-purp multi-purposeose canisters canisters (at (at8989 assemblies assembliesper percanister). canister). It It is is expected expected that that ananISFSI, ISFSI, operated operatedunder underaaPart Part50 50General GeneralLicense License (in accordance (in accordance with with10 10CFRCFR72,72,Subpart Subpart KK [10]), will 1101), will be constructed to be constructed to support support continued continued plant operations operations.. The The facility facility is assumed assumed to to bebe expanded expanded following following the cessation of of plant plant operations operations to to support supportfuture future decommis sioning operations. decommissioning operations. As As such, such, the fuel fuel (in (in the theDECON DECONand and SAFSTOR SAFSTOR scenarios) is packaged for interim storage at interim storage atthe theISFSI. ISFSI. TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document E16-1640-006,, Rev. Document E16-1640-006 Rev. 00 DecommissioningCost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 1,1, Page Page 66 of of 88 Exelon's strongly held Exelon'sposition strongly held position is that the is DOE that the has DOE ahas a contractual contract ual obligationtoto accept obligation acceptClinton's Clinton'sfuel fuelinin aa timely timely manner and consistent consistent with its with its contract contract commitmen commitments. ts. No No assumption assumptionmade madein in this study this study should be should be interpreted interpreted to to bebe inconsistent inconsistent with this claim. claim. However, However, at this time, this time, including including the the cost cost ofof storing storingspent spentfuelfuelin in this this study study is is the most reasonable most reasonable approach approachbecause becauseitit insures insures the the availability availability of of sufficient decommissi sufficient decommissioning oningfundsfundsatatthethe end end ofof the the station's life if the the DOE has DOE has not met its contractual contractual obligation obligation to taketake the the fuel. fuel. 1.3.2 1.3.2 Low-Level Radioactive Low-Level Radioactive Waste Acts The contamina The contaminated ted andand activated activated material generated generated in the in the decontamination and decontamination and dismantling dismantling of a commercial commercial nuclear reactor is is classified classified as as low-level low-level (radioactive) (radioactive)waste, waste,although althoughnot not all the all of the material is suitable material suitable for for "shallow-la "shallow-land" nd" disposal. disposal. With With the passage passage of of the "Low-Leve "Low-Levell Radioactive Radioactive Waste Waste Policy Policy Act" Act" in in1980,[111 1980,[11] andand itsits Amendment Amendmentss of of 1985,[12] 1985,[12] the thestates states became became ultimately ultimately responsible for for the disposition disposition of of low-level low-level radioactive radioactive wastewaste generated generated within their their own borders. With the the exception exception of of Texas (which has issued issuedaa license licenseto to Waste Control Waste Specialistsfor Control Specialists for the operation of the operation a new facility of a new facility in in Andrews, Andrews, Texas), Texas), no new new compact compact facilities facilities have have beenbeensuccessfully successfully sited, licensed, and and constructed. constructed. The disposal facility in Barnwell,Barnwell, SouthSouth Carolina Carolina is is currently currentlyclosed closed to to generators outside generators outside the Atlantic Atlantic Compact Compact (comprisin (comprisingg the the states of of Connecticut, Connecticut, New New Jersey Jersey and and South SouthCarolina). Carolina). The Thecommercia commerciall disposal disposal facility facility on the the Hanford Hanford Nuclear Nuclear Reservation Reservation near nearRichland, Richland, Washington accepts accepts low-level low-level radioactive radioactive wastewaste from from the the Northwest Northwest (Alaska, (Alaska, Hawaii, Hawaii, Idaho, Idaho, Montana, Montana, Oregon,Oregon, Utah, Utah, Washingto Washingtonn and and Wyoming) Wyoming) and Rocky Rocky Mountain Mountain (Colorado, (Colorado, Nevada, Nevada, and andNewNewMexico) Mexico) Compact Compact states. states. This This leaves EnergySolutions' leaves EnergySolut disposal facility ions' disposal facility in inClive, Clive, Utah Utah asas the theonly onlyavailable availableoption optionfor for the thedisposal disposalof ofthe themajority majorityofofthe the low-level low-level radioactive waste waste generated generatedin indecommissio decommissioning Clinton. ning Clinton. For For the the purpose purpose of ofthis thisanalysis, analysis,Exelon's Exelon's"Life"Life ofofPlant PlantAgreement" Agreement" with EnergySolut with EnergySolutions is ions is used used asas the thebasis basisfor for estimating estimating the thedisposal disposal cost cost for for the the majority majority of of the theradioactive radioactivewaste waste (Class (Class A[131). A[13]). EnergySolut ions does not EnergySolutions does not have aa license have license toto dispose dispose of of the the more more highly highly radioactive radioactive waste (Classes (Classes B B and and C),C), for for example, example, generated generated in inthethe dismantling dismantlingof ofthe thereactor reactorvessel. vessel. As As aa proxy proxy for for future futuredisposal disposalfacilities, facilities, waste wastedisposal disposalcostscostsforforthethe higher higher activity activity waste (Class BB and waste (Class and C) C) are are based based uponupon the the last last TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev.00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 1, Page 77of 1, Page of88 published rate sched ule for published ratenon-c schedule ompa for non-compact ct waste waste for the for the Barnw Barnwellell facility, adjusted for escalatio facility, adjusted for escalationn of ofthe the Atlantic Atlantic Compact Compact rates.rates. Material exceeding Material exceedingClass ClassCClimits limits (limited (limited to to material material closest closest to to the the reactor reactor corecore andand comprising comprisingaa small percentage small percent age ofof the the total waste waste volume)isis general volume) generally ly not not suitable suitable for for shallow shallow-land disposal.l. This
-land disposa This materia material l is is package packagedd in in the the samesame multipu multipurpose canisterss used rpose canister used forfor spent fuel spent fuel storage/transport storage/transport and anddesignat designateded forforgeologic geologic disposal disposal..
A signific A significant ant portion portion of of thethe metalli metallic waste genera c waste generated ted duringduring decomm issioning decommissioning may may only only be be potentially contaminated potentially contami nated by by radioact radioactiveive materials. This materials. This waste waste can can be be surveye surveyedd on on site shipped off site or shipped off site to site to licensed facilitie s for further licensed facilities for further analysi analysis, for process s, for processing and/or for ing and/or for conditioning/recovery. Reduction conditioning/recovery. Reduction in the volume volume of of low-leve low-levell radioact radioactiveive waste requirin waste requiringg disposadisposall in in aalicensed licensedlow-lev low-level radioactive el radioac waste tive waste disposal facility disposal facility cancan be accomp accomplished lished through through a varietyvariety of of method methods, s, including analyses including analyses and and surveys surveys or decontadecontamination mination to eliminate the to eliminate portion of portion of waste waste thatthat does does not not require require disposal disposal as asradioact radioactive waste, ive waste, compaction,incineration compaction, incinerationoror metal metal melt.melt. The estimates The estimat reflect es reflect the the savings from waste recovery /volume reduction. recovery/volume reduction. 1.3.3 Radiolog Radiological ical Criteria Criteria for License License Termination Termination In 1997, 1997, the NRC NRC publishe published Subpart E, d Subpart E, "Radiol "Radiological Criteria for ogical Criteria for License Termina License Termination,"[ tion,"[141] amending 14 amending 10 CFR CFR §20.§20. This subpart subpart provides provides radiolog radiologicalical criteria criteria for for releasing releasing aa facility facility forfor unrestri unrestricted cted use. The The regulati regulation on states that thethe site site can
*can bebe released released for for unrestr unrestricted icted use if if radioac tivity levels radioactivity levels areare such such thatthat thethe average average membemember of a critical r of a critical group group would not receive receive aa TotalTotal Effectiv Effective Dose Equival e Dose Equivalent (TEDE) in ent (TEDE) in excess excess ofof 2525 millirem millirem per per year, year, andand provided provided that that residual residual radioact radioactivity ivity has has been been reduced reduced to to levels levels that thatare areAsAsLow LowAs AsReasona Reasonably Achievable bly Achieva ble (ALARA (ALARA). ). The The decomm issioning estimate decommissioning estimates for Clinton s for Clinton assume assume that thatthethe site site will will be be remedia remediated ted to to aa residua residuall level levelconsiste consistent with the nt with the NRC- NRC-prescrib ed level.
prescribed level. It It should should be be noted noted that thatthe theNRC NRCand andthe theEnviron Environmental Protection mental Protecti on Agency Agency (EPA) (EPA) differ on the amount amount of of residual residual radioact radioactivity considered ivity considered accepta ble in site acceptable site remedia remediation.tion. The EPA EPA has two two limits limits that thatapplyapplyto to radioact ive material radioactive materials. s. An An EPAEPA limitlimit ofof 15 15 millirem millirem per per year year isis derived derived from from criteria criteria establis hed bybythethe established Comprehensive Compre hensive Environ Environmental mental Respons Response,e, Compen sation, and Compensation, and Liability Liability ActAct (CERCLA (CERCL A or or Superfund)J Superfun d).[151151 AnAn addition additional al limit limit of of 44 millirem millirem per per year, year, as asdefined defined inin4040CFR CFR
§141.16,
§141.16,isisapplied appliedtotodrinking drinking water.[16 waterJ1161 TLG TLGServices, Services,Inc.
Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev.Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 1, Page 88 of 1, Page of 88 On October On October9,9,2002, 2002,the the NRC NRCsigned signedan an agreement agreement with with the the EPA on the radiologic the radiological al decommis decommissioning and decontamination sioning and decontamination of of NRC-NRC-licensed sites. The licensed TheMemorand Memorandum um ofofUnderstand Understanding (MOD)[171 ing (MOU) [17] provides provides that EPA that EPA will will defer defer exercise exercise of of authority authority under under CERCLA CERCLA for for the the majority of majority of facilities facilities decommissioned decommissionedunder under NRC NRC authority. authority. The The MOU MOU also includes also includes provisions provisions forfor NRC NRCand and EPA EPA consultation consultation for certain sites for certain when, when, at at thethe time time of of license license termination, termination, (1) (1) groundwater groundwater contamination exceeds contamination exceeds EPA-permitted EPA-permitted levels; (2) NRC levels; (2) NRC contempla contemplates tes restricted release restricted release of of the the site; site; and/or and/or (3)(3) residual residual radioactiv radioactivee soil soil concentrations exceed levels defined in the MOU. concentrations MOU. The MOU The MOU does does notnot impose impose any new new requireme requirements on NRC nts on NRC licensees licensees and should reduce the the involvemen involvementt of of the EPA EPA with with NRC NRC licensees who who are decommiss ioning. Most decommissioning. Most sites sites are expected expected to to meet the NRC criteria criteria for unrestricted for unrestricted use,use, and thethe NRC NRC believes believes that only only aa few few sites sites will will have groundwat groundwater er or or soil soil contaminat contamination ion ininexcess excess ofof the the levels levels specified specified in the MOU that trigger consultatio consultation n with the EPA.EPA. However, However, if if there are other hazardous materials materials on on the thesite, site,the theEPAEPAmaymaybe beinvolved involved in in the cleanup. cleanup. As such,such, the the possibility possibility of of dual dual regulation regulation remains remains for for certain licensees. The present study study does does not include any any costs costs for this occurrence occurrence.. TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 2, Page 1 of 2, Page 1 of 14 14 2.
- 2. DECOMMISSIONING DECOMMISSIONING ALTERNATIVES ALTERNATIVES Detailed cost Detailed cost estimates estimates were were developed developed to decommission to decommi ssion Clinton Clinton for three for three variations of the approved variations approved decommiss decommissioningioning alternative alternatives: DECON and s: DECON and SAFSTOR SAFSTOR..
Although the Although the scenarios differ with respect to to technique, technique, process, process, cost, cost, and and schedule, schedule, they attain they attain the same result: the the ultimate ultimate release release of of the the site site for for unrestricte unrestricted use. d use. Three decommis Three decommissioningsioningscenarios scenarioswere wereevaluated evaluatedfor forthethe nuclear nuclear unit. unit. TheThe scenarios selected scenarios selectedare are representative representative of of alternatives alternatives available to the available to the owner owner and are defined defined as follows: follows: 1.
- 1. DECON:The DECON: The plant's plant's operating operating license license currently expires on Septembe currently expires Septemberr 29, 29, 2026. However, 2026. However,for forpurposes purposes of ofthis this study, study, the the license is assumed to be renewed renewed for an additional for additional 20 20 years years (until (until 2046).
2046). The The first scenario scenario assumes assumes that an an ISFSI is constructe constructed d to support continued continued plant plant operations operations and andexpanded expandedonce once the plant plant isis shut shutdown down to to accommod accommodate ate any residual residual spent spent fuel fuel inin the thepool pool and and facilitate facilitate decontami nation and dismantlin decontamination dismantling activities within g activities within the the fuel fuel building. building. fuel storage Spent fuel storage operations operations continue continueat at the the site site until the transfer transfer of of the fuel fuel to the DOE is complete, assumed to be in the the year year 2064. 2064.
- 2. Delayed Delayed DECON:DECON:InInthe the second second scenario, scenario,the the unit unit is prepared for is prepared for an an abbreviate abbreviatedd period period of storage.
storage. The spent spent fuelfuel discharged discharged to to the thestorage storagepool pool once operations cease once operations cease remains remains in the pool pool until it it can can be be transferred transferredtotoaaDOE DOE facility. Decommissioning Decommissioning is is delayed delayed until until the transfer transfer of of the the fuel fuel to to the the DOE DOE is is complete (i.e., in the year year 2064). 2064). TheThe unit unitisisthen thendecommiss decommissioned.ioned.
- 3. SAFSTOR SAFSTOR: :The The nuclear nuclear unit unit is placed placed into safe-storag safe-storagee in the the third thirdscenario.
scenario. However, decommis However, decommissioning sioningisis deferred deferred beyond beyond the the fuel storage period fuel storage period to the the maximum maximum extent extentpossible; possible; termination terminationofofthe thelicense licensewould wouldconclude conclude within withinthe the maximum maximum required 60-year 60-year period. period. AsAs in in the theDECON DECON scenario, scenario, spentspentfuelfuelisis relocated relocated to an ISFSI ISFSI until until ititcan canbe betransferred transferredtotoa aDOE DOEfacility. facility.Dormancy Dormancy continues continues following following thethe removal removal of of spent spent fuel fuel from from thethe site, site,timed timedtotoallowallowfinal final decommis sioning and decommissioning and license license termination termination to be be completed completed within 60 60 years years of of final final shutdown. shutdown. The The following following sections describe describe the basic activities associated associated with with eacheach alternative alternative. . Although detailed Although detailed procedures procedures for for each each activity activity identified identified are arenot notprovided, provided,and andthe the actual actualsequence sequence of of work work may may vary, vary, the theactivity activitydescription descriptions provideaabasis s provide basisnotnotonly only for estimating but for estimating but alsofor also forthetheexpected expectedscopescopeofofwork work(i.e., (i.e.,engineerin engineering g andand planning planningatatthethetime timeofofdecommiss ioning). decommissioning). TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev.Rev.00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section2,2,Page Page 2 of 2 of 14 14 The conceptual The conceptualapproach approachthat that the the NRCNRC has describe describedd in its its regulati regulations divides ons divides decommissioninginto decommissioning intothree threephases. phases. The initial phase commen initial phase commences ces with the effective effective date of date ofpermanent permanent cessation cessation of ofoperations operationsand and involves involvesthe thetransition transition of of both both plant plant and licensee and licensee fromfrom reactor reactor operatio operations (i.e., power ns (i.e., power product production) to facilitate ion) to facilitate de- de-activatio n and closure. activation and closure. During theDuring the first first phase, phase, notification notification is is to to be be provided provided to to the the NRCcertifying NRC certifyingthe the permanent permanent cessation cessation of operations operations and the the removal removal of of fuel from from the reactor the reactor vessel. vessel. TheThe licensee licensee would then then be be prohibit prohibited from reactor operatio ed from operation. n. The second The secondphase phase encompasses encompassesactivitiesactivitiesduringduring the the storage storage period period or or during during major major decomm issioning activities,or decommissioning activities, oraa combination combinationof ofthe thetwo. two.The Thethird third phase phase pertains pertains to to the activitie the activitiess involve involvedd in in license license termina termination. The decommissioning tion. The decommissioning estimates estimates developedfor developed forClinton Clinton are are also also divided divided intointo phases phases or periods; periods; however, however, demarcation demarcation of the of the phases phases is is based based upon upon major major milesto milestones within the nes within the project project or or signific significant ant changes changes in the projecte projectedd expenditures. expenditures. 2.1 2.1 DECON DECON The DECON The DECON alternative, alternative, as defined defined by by the NRC, NRC, is is "the "the alternative alternative in in which which the the equipm equipment,ent, structur structures, es, and portion portionss of of aa facility facility and and site sitecontain containing ing radioactive contaminants radioactive contaminants are are removed removed or decontaminated or deconta minated to to a level level that that permits permits the the propert propertyy to to be be release released for unrestr d for unrestricted icted use use shortly shortly after after cessatio cessation n of operations." operations." This study study doesdoes not address address the thecost costtotodispose dispose ofofthe the spent fuel fuel residing at the site; site; such such costs costs are funded through aa surcharg surcharge on e on electrica electricall generation. generation. However, However,the the study does estimate the study does the costs costs incurred incurred with the the interim interim on-site on-site storage storage of of the the fuel fuel pending pending shipmen shipmentt by by the the DOE DOE to to an an off-site off-site disposal disposal facility. facility. 2.1.1 2.1.1 Period Period 11 - Preparations Preparations In In anticipa anticipationtion of of the the cessati cessationon of ofplant plantoperatioperations, detailed ons, detaile d preparat preparationsions are are undertak undertaken en to toprovide provide aa smooth smooth transitio transition from plant n from plant operatio operations ns to to site sitedecomm issioning. Throug decommissioning. Throughh implem implementation entation of of aa staffing staffing transitio transitionn plan, plan, thethe organiz organization requiredd to ation require to manage manage the the intended decomm intended decommissioning issioning activitie activitiess isis assembl assembled from availabl ed from available plant e plant staff staff and and outside outside resourc resources. es. Prepara Preparations include the tions include the plannin planning g forfor permane nt defuelin permanent defueling ofthe g of thereactor, reactor,revision revisionofoftechnica technical specifications l specific ations applicab applicable le to to thethe operatin operating g conditio conditionsns and and require requirements, ments, aa charact erizatio n of the characterization of the facility and facility and major major compon components, ents, andand thethe developm development ent of ofthe thePSDAR. PSDAR. TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640 -006,Rev. Rev.00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 2, Page 3 of 2, Page 3 of 14 14 Engineeringand Engineering andPlanning Planning The PSDAR, The PSDAR,required requiredwithin withintwo twoyearsyears of of the notice to the notice to cease cease operations, provides operations, provides aa description description of the licensee's of the licensee's planned planned decommissioningactivities, decommissioning activities,a atimetable, timetable,and and thethe associated associated financial financial requirements of requirements of the the intended intended decommissioning decommissioningprogram. program. Upon receipt receipt of the PSDAR of the PSDAR, ,the theNRC NRCwill willmake makethe the document document available available to to the public public for comment for commentin in aa local local meeting meetingto to be be held held in in the vicinity of the vicinity of the the reactor site. Ninety site. Ninety days days following following submittal submittal and NRC NRC receipt receipt of of the the PSDAR PSDAR,, the licensee the licensee may begin to to perform perform major major decomm decommissioning activities issioning activities under a modified under modified 10 10 CFR CFR §50.59
§50.59 procedu procedure, i.e., without re, i.e., withoutspecific specific NRCNRC approval. Major approvaL Major activities activitiesare are defined definedas as any any activity activity thatthat results in in permanent remova permanent removall of major major radioac radioactive components, tive components, permanently permanently modifiesthe modifies the structure structure of of the the containment, containment, or or results dismantling results in dismant ling components (for components (for shipment) shipment) containing containing GTCC, GTCC, as defined by 10 as defined 10 CFR CFR
§61. MajorMajor components components are are further defined as compris further defined comprising reactor ing the reactor vessel and vessel and internal internals, s, large large borebore reactor reactor recircul recirculation system ation system piping, piping, and other large compon large components ents thatthat areareradioact radioactive.ive. TheThe NRCNRC includes includes the followi the following ng additional additionalcriteria criteria for for use use of of thethe §50.59
§50.59 process process in in decomm issioning decommissioning. . The proposed activity mustmust not:not:
it foreclos foreclosee release release of of the the site for for possible possible unrestricted unrestricted use, use,
.. significa ntly increase significantly increase decomm decommissioning issioning costs,costs,
** cause any significa nt significant environm environmental impact, or ental impact, or
*.. violate the the terms termsof of the the licensee licensee's existinglicense.
's existing license.
Existing Existing operatio operational nal technica technical l specifica specifications tions arearereviewed reviewedand andmodified modified to to reflect reflect plantplant conditio conditions ns andand thethesafety safetyconcern concerns associated s associated with with perman ent permanent cessatio cessationn of of operati operations. ons. The The environ environmental mental impact impact associate associated d with with the the planned planneddecomm decommissioning issioning activitiactivities is es is also also consider ed. Typicall considered. Typically, y, a licensee licensee will not be will not be allowed allowed to to proceed proceed if if the the consequ consequences ences of aa particular particular decommdecommissioning issioning activity are greater greater thanthan that that bounded bounded by bypreviou previously sly evaluate evaluated environmental d environ assessments mental assessm ents or or impact impact stateme nts. InInthis statements. thisinstance instance, thelicensee
, the licenseewouldwould havehave to to submit submit aa license license amend amendment ment for for the the specifi specificc activity activity and and update update the the environm environmental ental report.
report. The The decomm issioning program decommissioning program outlined outlinedin inthe thePSDAR PSDARwill willbebedesigned designed to to accomp accomplish lish the the required required tasks taskswithin withinthe theALARA ALARA guidelin guidelines es (as (as defined in defined in 10CFR 10 CFR§20) §20) for for protecti protectionon of ofpersonn personnel from exposur el from exposure e toto radiatio radiation n hazards hazards. . ItItwill willalsoalsoaddress addressthe thecontinue continued protection d protection of the of the health and safety health and safety of of the thepublic public and andthe theenviron environmentment duringduring the the dismant dismantling ling activity activity. . Consequ Consequently,ently, with with the thedevelop development ment of theof the TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Clinton Rev.00 DecommissioningCost CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 2, Page 4of Page Decommissioning 2, 4 of14 14 PSDAR,activity PSDAR, activityspecifications, specifications,cost-benefit cost-benefitand andsafety safetyanalyses, analyses,and and workpackages work packagesand and procedures, procedures,would would be assembled to support be assembled to support the the proposeddecontamination proposed decontaminationand and dismantling dismantling activities. activities. SitePreparations Site Preparations Followingfinal Following finalplant plant shutdown, shutdown,and and in preparation in prepar ation for actual for actual decommissioning,the decommissioning, the following followingactivities activitiesare areinitiated: initiated:
- Characterizationofofthe Characterization the site site and and surrou surrounding environs.
nding enviro This ns. This include s radiatio n survey includes radiation surveyss of work work areas,areas, majormajorcompocomponents nents (includingthe (including thereactor reactorvessel vesseland anditsits internals), internals), internal piping, and internal piping, and primary shield primary shield cores.
- An ISFSI An ISFSI is is design ed, license designed, licensedd and and constru constructed cted to to suppor supportt continu continued ed plant operatio operation and expand n and expanded following ed followi ng the cessatio cessation of n of operationstoto offload operations offloadthe the spent spent fuel fuel pool in support pool in support of the of the decommissioning program.
decommissioning program.
- Isolation of Isolation of the spent fuel fuel storage storage pool pool and fuel handlinhandling systems,,
g systems such that such that decom missioning operati decommissioning operations ons cancan comme commence nce on on thethe balance balance of the plant. Decom the plant. Decommissioning missioning operati operationsons areare schedu scheduled led around around the fuel fuel handlin handling area totooptimi g area optimize ze thetheoverall overallproject project schedu schedule. le. The The fuel fuel isis transferred transferred to to the ISFSI as it the ISFSI it decays decays to to the the point point that that itit meets meets the theheat heatload loadcriteria criteriaofofthe thecontai containers. ners. Conseq uently, it Consequently, it is assume assumed that the d that thefuel fuelpoolpool remains remainsoperatio operational nal for approxi approximatelymately fivefive and and one-hal one-half years followin f years following the cessatio g the cessation n ofof plant plant operatio operations. ns.
- Specifi cation of Specification of transport transport andand disposa disposall require requirements ments for for activate activatedd materia ls and/or materials and/or hazardous hazard ous materia materials, including ls, includi shielding ng shieldi ng andand waste waste stabiliz ation.
stabilization.
- Develo pment of proced Development ures for procedures for occupa occupational exposure tional exposu control, re control ,
control control andand release release of ofliquid liquidand andgaseou gaseous s effluent, processing ofof effluent, processing radwas radwaste te (includ (includinging dry-act ive waste, dry-active waste, resins, resins, filter filtermedia, media,metallic metallic and and non-me tallic compon non-metallic ents generat components generated in decommissioning), ed in decommissioning), site site security and security andemerge emergency ncy program programs, andindustri s, and industrial safety. al safety. 2.1.2 2.1.2 Period Period 2 Decomm issioning Operati Decommissioning Operations ons This Thisperiod periodinclude includes s the thephysica physical l decomm decommissioning activities issioning activitie associated s associat ed with with thetheremov removal al and anddispos disposalal ofofcontamcontaminated inated and andactivat activated ed compon componentsents andandstructur es, includin structures, including thesuccess g the successful termination ful termina tion ofofthe the TLG TLGServices , Inc. Services, Inc.
ClintonPower PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Clinton Rev.00 DecommissioningCost CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 2, Page 5 of Page Decommissioning 2, 5 of1414 10 10CFRCFR§50§50operating operating license. license. Significant Significant decommissioning decommissioning activities activities in inthis this phase phase include: include:
~ Construction of Construction oftemporary temporary facilities facilities and/or and/or modification modification of of existing existing facilitiestoto support facilities support dismantling dismantling activities.
activities. ThisThis may include aa may include centralized processing centralized processingarea area to to facilitate equipment facilitate equipm removall and ent remova and compon component ent preparations preparations for off-site off-site disposal. disposal. It
- Reconfiguration Reconfigurationand and modification modificationof ofsite sitestructures structures and facilities as as needed to needed to support decomm issioning operations.
decommissioning operations. This This may include include the upgradi the upgrading ng of roads roads (on-(on- and off-site) to and off-site) to facilitate facilitate hauling hauling and and transport. Modifications transport. Modifications may may be requiredd to be require to the the contain containment ment structure to structure to facilitate facilitate accessaccess of of large/heavy large/heavy equipment. equipment. Modifications may Modifications may alsoalso bebe required required to the refuelin to the refuelingg area area of of the the reactor building reactor building to to support the segmensegmentation tation of of the reactor reactor vesselvessel internals andand compon component ent extractio extraction. n.
** Design Design andand fabricat fabrication ion of of temporary temporary and permanent and perman shielding ent shieldin g toto support remova support removal l and transpo transportation activities, rtation activitie construction s, construction of of contami nation contamination control envelop envelopes, es, and the procurem procurement ent of of specialty specialty tooling.
*11 Procure ment (lease or purchas Procurement purchase) canisters, e) of shipping canister cask liners, s, cask liners, and industria l package industrial packages. s.
** Deconta mination of components Decontamination components and and piping piping systems systems as required to to control (minimiz (minimize) e) worker worker exposure exposure..
** Remova Removall of of piping piping and compon components ents no longer essentia no longer essentiall to to support support decomm issioning operatio decommissioning ns.
operations.
.. Transfe Transferr ofof the steam steam separato separator anddryer r and dryerassembl assemblies ies totothethedryer-dryer-separat or pool separator pool for for segmen segmentation. Segmentation tation. Segmen tation by by weight weight and and activity activity maximiz maximizes es the loading loading of the shielded shielded transpor transport casks.
t casks. The The operatio operations ns are are conduc conducted ted under under waterwater using usingremotel remotely operated y operate d tooling tooling and and contami nation controls contamination controls. .
** Disconn ection of Disconnection of the control control blades blades from from the drivesdrives on on thethevessel vessel lower lower head.
head. Blades Blades are are transfer transferred to the spent fuel red to the spent fuel pool for pool for packagin packaging.g.
.. Disassem Disassembly,bly, segment ation, and segmentation, and packagi packaging ng of of the thecorecore shroud shroudand and in-core in-core guide guide tubes.
tubes. Some Some of of the the materia material is expected l is expected to exceed to exceed Class Class CC disposa disposall require requirements. ments. As As such, such, thosethose segmen segments ts areare package packaged d ininmodified modifiedfuel fuelstorage storagecanisters canistersfor forgeologic geologicdisposal disposal. . TLG TLGServices, Services,Inc.Inc.
ClintonPower PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Clinton Rev.00 DecommissioningCost CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 2, Page 6of Page Decommissioning 2, 6 of14 14
~ Removaland Removal andsegmentation segmentationof ofthe theremaining remaininginternals internals including including the the jet pump jet pump assemblies, assemblies, orificedorificedfuel supports, and fuel supports, and core suppor core supportt assembly.
assembly.
- Drainingand Draining and decontamination decontamination of ofthethereactor reactorwell well and and thethe permanent sealing permanent sealing of ofthe thespent spentfuelfueltransfer gate. Install a transfer gate. Install a shielded shielded platform for platform for segmentation segmentation of of the the reactor reactor vessel.
vessel. Cutting operatio operations ns are performed are performedin in air air using using remotely remotely operated operated equipment equipment within within aa contamination control contamination controlenvelope, envelope,with withthe the water water levellevel maintai maintained ned just below just below the the cut to to minim minimize the workin ize the workingg area area dose dose rates. rates. Sections are Sections are transferred transferred to the the dryer-s dryer-separator eparator pool pool for for packag packaging ing and interim and interim storage. storage.
- Disconnectionofofthe Disconnection thecontrol controlrod roddrives drivesand and instrumentation instrumentation tubes from the from the reactor reactor vessel vessel lower lowerhead. head. The lower reactor The lower reactor head head andand vessel supporting structure vessel supporting structure are then segmen segmented.ted.
- Removal of Removal of the the reactor reactor recirculation recirculation pumps. Exteriorr surface pumps. Exterio surfacess areare decontaminated and opening decontaminated openings covered.. Components s covered Components can serve as can serve as their own burial their own burial contain containers ers provid provided ed that that allall penetra penetrationstions areare properly sealed.
$ Demoli Demolition tion of of the the sacrific sacrificial activated ial shield activate concrete d concret e byby controll controlled ed demolit demolition. ion.
- Transfe Transferr of of the spent spent fuel fuel from from thethe storage storage pool pool to to the the ISFSI ISFSI pad padforfor interim storage storage.. Spent Spent fuel fuel storage storage operatio operations continue ns continu throughout e through out the active active decomm issioning period.
decommissioning period. Fuel transferr is Fuel transfe is expecte expected d to to begin in 2063 in 2063 and and to to be be complet completed ed byby the the end endof ofthe theyear year2064. 2064. At At least least twotwo years years prior prior to to the theanticipa anticipated dateofoflicense ted date license termina termination, tion, an an LTP LTP is is require required. d. Submit Submitted ted asas aa supplem supplement ent to to the theFinal FinalSafety Safety Analysi Analysis s Report Report (FSAR) (FSAR) or or its its equivalent, equivalent, the plan plan mustmustinclude include:: aa site site charact erization, descrip characterization, tion of the remain description remaining dismantling ing disman activities, tling activities, plans plans for for site site remedi ation, procedu remediation, procedures for the res for the final final radiatio radiation survey, n survey, designa designation tion of of the the end use use ofof the the site, site, ananupdate updated costestimat d cost estimate e toto comple complete te thethe decomm issioning, and decommissioning, and any anyassocia associated environmental ted environmental concern concerns. s. The NRC NRC willwill notice notice the receipt of the plan, plan, make make the the plan plan availab available le forfor public public comme comment, nt, and and schedu schedule a local meeting. le a local meeting. LTP LTP approva l will be approval will be subject subject to to any anyconditio conditions andlimitati ns and limitations ons asasdeemed deemed appropr appropriate iate by bythetheCommi ssion. The Commission. Thelicensee licenseemay maythen thencomme commence with nce with the final remedia tion the final remediation ofsite of sitefacilitie facilitiess and andservices services, including:
, includin g:
It Remov Removal al of of remaini remaining ng plant plantsystems systemsand andassocia associated components ted compon ents asas they they becombecome e noness ential to nonessential to the thedecomdecommissioning missioning program program or or TLG TLGServices , Inc. Services, Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640- 006,Rev.Rev.00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section2,2,Page Page 7 of 7 of1414 workerhealth worker health and and safety safety (e.g., (e.g., waste waste collecti collection on and and treatment treatment systems, electrical systems, electrical power powerand ventilation systems). and ventilation systems).
- Removalofofthe Removal the steel steel liners liners fromfrom the drywelldrywell,, disposin disposingg of of the the activate activatedd and and contaminated contaminated sections as radioact radioactive waste. Remova ive waste. Removall ofany of anyactivated/contaminated activated/contaminated concrete. concrete.
It Removalof Removal ofthethe steel steel liners liners from from the dryer-se dryer-separator pool, reactor parator pool, reactor well, and well, and spentspent fuel storage storage pool.pool. (I) Surveys of Surveys ofthethedecontaminated decontaminated areas areas ofofthe the containment containment structure. structure.
- Removalof Removal ofthe the contaminated contaminated equipment equipment and and material material from from thethe turbine and turbine and radwas radwaste te buildin buildings, and any gs, and any other othercontam contaminated inated facility. Use facility. Use radiation radiation and contami contamination control techniqu nation control techniques until es until radiation surveys radiation surveys indicate indicate that structures that the structur es cancan bebe released released for for unrestricted access unrestricted access and convent conventional demolition.
ional demolition. This activity may may necessitate the dismant necessitate dismantling ling andand disposit disposition ion ofof most most ofof the the systems systems and compon components ents (both (both clean clean andand contaminated) contaminated) located within these building s. buildings. This activity will facilitat facilitatee surface deconta decontamination mination and and subsequent verifica subsequent tion surveys verification surveys required prior to obtainin obtaining release g release for demoliti demolition. on.
.. Remov Removalal of of thethe remaini remaining ng compon components, equipment, ents, equipm ent, and plantplant services in support support of of the area area release releasesurvey(s survey(s). ).
$ Routin Routingg of of materia materiall removeremovedd in in thethedecont decontamination amination and and dismant dismantling ling to aa central central process processing area. Material certified ing area. Material certified to be to be free of contami free of contamination nation is released released for for unrestri unrestricted disposition, cted disposit e.g.,
ion, e.g., as scrap, scrap, recycle, recycle, or or general general disposa disposal. Contaminated
- l. Contam material inated material is is charact erized characterized and segrega segregated ted forfor addition additional off-site process al off-site processing ing (disasse mbly, chemical (disassembly, chemical cleaning, cleaning, volumevolume reduction, reduction, and waste waste treatmen treatment), t), and/or and/or package packaged for controll d for controlled disposal at ed disposal ata alow-lev low-level el radioact radioactive ive waste waste disposal disposalfacility.
facility. Incorpo Incorporated ratedinto into the the LTP LTP is is the the Final Final Survey Survey Plan. Plan. ThisThis planplan identifie identifies s the the radiolog ical survey radiological surveys s to to be be perform performed once ed once the the deconta minatio decontaminationn activitie activitiess are complet completed ed and is is develop developed using the ed using the guidanc guidancee provide providedd in in the the"Multi-A "Multi-Agency Radiation gency Radiatio Survey and n Survey and Site Site Investiga Investigationtion Manual Manual(MARSS (MARSSIM)."[18] IM)."[18] This This document incorporates document incorpor the ates the statistica statistical l approac approaches hes toto survey survey design design andand data data interpre interpretation used tation used by by the EPA. It also identifie the EPA. It also identifies s commer commercially available cially availabl instrumentation e instrume ntation and and procedu procedures res forfor conduct conductinging radiolog radiological surveys.. Use ical surveys Use ofof this this guidanc guidance e ensures ensures that that the thesurveys surveys are areconduct conducted ed inin aa manner mannerthat thatprovide provides s aa high high degree degree of ofconfiden confidence ce that that applicab applicable NRC criteria le NRC criteria arearesatisfied satisfied. . Once the survey is complet Once the survey is complete, the results e, the results areareprovided provided to to the theNRC NRC in inaa TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Clinton Rev.00 DecommissioningCost CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 2, Page 8of Page Decommissioning 2, 8 of1414 formatthat format that cancan bebe verified. verified. TheThe NRCNRCthen then reviews reviews and and evaluates evaluates the the information, performs information, performs an an independent independent confirmconfirmationation radiological site of radiological site conditions,and conditions, andmakes makesaa determination determination on on final final termination termination of of the the license. license. The NRC The NRC will will amend amend the the operating operating license (to (to reduce reduce the license to to the the ISFSI) if it determ ISFSI) if it determines ines that that site site remedi remediation ation has been been perform performed ed inin accordancewith accordance withthetheLTP, LTP,and andthat that the the terminal terminal radiation radiation survey and and associated documentation associated documentationdemonstrate demonstratethat that the (not associa the site (not associatedted with the ISFSI) is suitable for release. with 2.1.3 Period 2.1.3 Period 33 -- Site Site Restoration Restoration Following completion Following completion of of decommissioning decommissioningoperations, operations, site site restoration restoration activities will activities will begin. begin. Efficient Efficient removal removal of of the contaminated materials the contaminated materials and verifica and verification tion that residua residual l radionu radio nuclide concentrations clide concen trations are are below below the NRC the limits will NRC limits will result result in in substan substantial damage tial damage to many many of theof the structur es. Althoug structures. Althoughh performed performed in a controll controlled, ed, safe manner manner,, blasting blasting,, scarification (surface removal), coring, drilling, scarification removal), and the and the other other deconta minatio n decontamination activitiesactivitie s will substantially will substan degradee power tially degrad power blockblock structures includi structures including ng the the reactor reactor,, turbine turbine and and radwas radwaste buildings. te buildings. Under certain certain circum stances, verifyin circumstances, verifyingg thatthat subsurf subsurface radionuclide ace radionu clide concent rations meet concentrations meet NRC NRC site site release release require requirements ments will will require require remova removall of grade slabs slabs andand lower lower floors, floors, potentia potentially weakening lly weaken footings ing footings and structu structural ral support supports. s. This Thisremova removal activity will l activity will be benecessa necessary ry forfor those those faciliti facilities es and and plant plant areas areas wherewhere histori historical records, cal records, when when availab le, indicate the potentia available, potentiall forfor radionu radionuclides clides .having having been present present in in the the soil, soil, where where system system failures failures havehave been been recorde recorded, d, or where ititisis or where require d to confirm that required to confirm that subsurf subsurfaceace process process and and drain drain lines lineswerewerenot not breache breached d over over the the operatin operating g life lifeofofthe the station. station. Prompt Prompt disman tling of dismantling of site site structur structures es isisclearly clearlythe themost mostappropappropriate riate and and cost-ef fectiveoption. cost-effective option. It is is unreaso unreasonable to anticipate nable to anticipate that thatthese these structur es structures wouldwould be be repaire repaired d and andpreserv preserved afterthe ed after theradiolo radiological gical contam ination is contamination is remove removed. d. The The cost cost to to disman dismantle site structures tle site structures with withaa work work force force already already mobiliz mobilized ed on site is on site is more more efficien efficientt thanthan ififthethe process process werewere deferre deferred. d. Site Site faciliti facilities quickly degrad es quickly degrade without e without mainte nance, adding maintenance, adding additio additional expensee and nal expens and creatin creating potential g potenti al hazard hazards s toto the thepublic public as aswell wellasastotofuture futureworkerworkers. Abandonment
- s. Abandonment creates creates aa breedin breeding g ground ground for for vermin vermin infesta infestation tion asas well well as as other other biologic al hazards biological hazards. .
TLG TLGServices , Inc. Services, Inc.
ClintonPower PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Clinton Rev.00 DecommissioningCost CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 2, Page 9of Page Decommissioning 2, 9 of1414 This cost This cost study study presum presumes es that non-essential that non-es sential structures structures and site and site facilitiesare facilities are dismantled dismantled as a continuation of the as a continuation of the decommissioningdecommissioning activity. Foundations activity. Foundationsand and exterior exterior walls walls areare removed removed to to aa nomina nominall depth of depth of three three feet feet below grade. The below grade. The three-foot depth allows for three-foot depth allows for the the placem placement ent ofofgravel gravelfor fordrainage, drainage, as as well well as as topsoil, topsoil, soso that that vegetation vegetation can be can be establi shed for established for erosion erosion control. control. Site Site areas affectedd by areas affecte by thethe disman tling dismantling activitiesactivitiesare arerestored restoredand andthethe plant plant area graded as area graded as required to required to prevent prevent pondin pondingg and inhibit inhibit the the refloati refloating ng of of subsurf subsurfaceace materials. materials. Concrete rubble Concrete rubble produced produced by demolition by demoli tion activities processed activities is process ed to to remove rebar remove rebar and miscell aneous embedm miscellaneous embedments. processed ents. The process material ed material is then used is used on on site site toto backfil backfilll voids. voids. Excess Excess materials materials are trucked to are trucked to an off-site an off-site area area for for disposal disposal as construction construction debris. 2.1.4 ISFSI 2.1.4 ISFSIOperati Operationsons andandDecom missioning Decommissioning The ISFSI will continu The continuee to operate operate under under aa general generallicense license (10(10 CFR CFR
§50) follow
§50) following ing the the comple completiontion of of the thedecomdecommissioning missioning proces process. s.
Assuming the DOE starts Assuming starts acceptin accepting fuel in g fuel in 2025, 2025, transfer transferof of spent spentfuel fuel from Clinton is from Clinton is anticipated anticipated to begin in 2063 2063 and continu continue e through the the year year 2064. 2064. At the the conclus conclusion ion of the spentspent fuel fuel transfer transferprocess process,, the the ISFSI ISFSIwillwillbe be decomm issioned decommissioned. . The The Commission Commissionwill willterminate terminate the §50 §50 license if if it it determ determinesines that that the the remedi ation of remediation of the the ISFSI ISFSI hashasbeen beenperform performed ed in in accorda accordance nce with with anan ISFSI ISFSI license license termination termination plan plan and that that the the final final radiatio radiation n survey survey and and associa ted docume associated documentation demonstrate ntation demons that trate that the the facility is suitable for release. facility suitable for release. Once Once the requirem requirements are satisfied ents are satisfied,, the the NRC NRC can termina terminate te the thelicense license forfor the the ISFSI. ISFSI. This This study study assume assumes s that, that,once oncethe thecasks casksare areemptied emptiedand anddisman dismantled, tled, and and thethelicense license forfor the the facility facility termina terminated, the pad can ted, the pad can be dismanbe dismantled tled using usingconvent ional techniqu conventional techniques es forforthethedemolit demolition ion ofofreinforc reinforced concrete. ed concret e. The The areaarea willwill then thenbe begraded gradedand andlandsc landscaped aped totoconforconform m to to the the surroun ding environ surrounding ment. environment. 2.2 2.2 SAFST SAFSTOR OR AND ANDDELAY DELAYED DECOMMISSIONING ED DECOM MISSIONING The The NRC NRC defines defines SAFST SAFSTOR OR as "the "the alternat alternative ive in inwhich whichthe thenuclear nuclearfacility facility isisplaced placed and andmaintai maintainedned inina aconditio condition n that thatallows allowsthe thenuclear nuclearfacility facilitytotobe be safely stored and subsequ ently deconta safely stored and subsequently decontaminated minated (deferre(deferred decontamination) d deconta mination) toto levels levels that thatpermit permitrelease releasefor forunrestr icted use." unrestricted use." TheThe facility facility isis left leftintact intact TLG TLGServices , Inc. Services, Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev.00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 2, Page 10 of 2, Page 10 of 14 14 (duringthe (during the dorman dormancy cy period), period),with with structures structures maintained maintainedin in aa sound sound condition . Systems condition. Systems not required to not required to operate operate in in support of the spent spent fuelfuel pool pool oror site site surveill surveillanceance and and security security are are drained drained,, de-ener de-energized, gized, and secured.. and secured Minimal cleaning/removal Minimal cleaning/removalof ofloose loosecontamination contaminationand/or and/orfixation fixationand and sealing sealing of remainin of remainingg contamination contamination are perform performed. Access to ed. Access to contaminated contaminated areas areas is is secured to secured to provide provide controlled controlled accessaccessfor forinspection inspectionand andmaintenance. maintenance. The engineering The engineeringand and planning planning requirements requirementsare are similar similar to those for to those for the the DECON alternat DECON alternative, although ive, although aa shorter shorter timetime period period is expecte expectedd for for these these activities due activities due toto the more more limited limited workwork scope. scope. Site Site prepara preparations are tions are also also similar similar to to those for for the DECON DECON alternati alternative. However,r, with the exceptio ve. Howeve exception n ofof the required radiatio the radiation n surveys surveys and and site sitecharacte characterizations, rizations, the themobiliz mobilization ation and preparation and preparation of of site facilities is less extensiv extensive. e. The following The following discussion discussion is is appropriate appropriate for for both the SAFSTO SAFSTOR and Delayed R and Delayed DECON scenari DECON scenarios,os,the the primary primary differences differencesbeing beingininthe the length length of the of the dormancy period. dormancy period. In In the the Delayed Delayed DECON DECON scenario,scenario,the fuel remains the fuel remains in the in the fuel building 's storage fuel building's storage pool pooluntil until such such time time thatthat the transfer transfer to to aa DOE DOE facility facility is complete. is complete. Decommissioning Decommissioning operations operations are assumedassumedto to begin beginonce once fuel fuel isis off off site. site. By contrast , in the contrast, in the SAFSTOR SAFSTO scenario,, the spent R scenario spent fuel fuel isis relocate relocated to the d to the ISFSI. The plant remains ISFSI. remains in in safe-sto safe-storage after the rage after the fuel fuel isisremoved removed from from site. site. Decomm Decommissioningissioningoperations operationsare are initiated initiated suchsuch that thethe license license is is terminat terminated ed within the required within the required60-year 60-year time time period. period. 2.2.1 2.2.1 Period 11 - Preparations Preparations Prepara Preparations tions forfor long-ter long-term storage include the m storage the planning planning for for permane permanent nt defuelin defueling g of of the the reactors reactors,, revision revision of of technica technicall specifica specifications tions appropr appropriate iate to to the the operatin operatingg conditio conditionsns and and require requirements, ments, aa characte rization of characterization of the the facility facility and and major major compon components, ents, and and the the developm development ent of of the the PSDAR. PSDAR. The The process process of of placing placing the plant plant in insafe-sto safe-storage includes,, but rage includes but isis not not limited to, the limited to, thefollowin following g activities activities:: 1/1 Isolatio Isolationn of of thethe spent spent fuel fuel storage storage service services andfuel s and fuelhandlin handling g systems systems located located in in the thefuel fuel building buildingso so that thatsafe-sto safe-storage operations rage operations may may commen commence ce on on the balance balance of the plant. plant. This This activity activity may may be be carried carried out out by byplant plantpersonn personnel el ininaccorda accordancence with withexisting existing operatin operating g technica technical l specific ations. Activitie specifications. Activities areschedule s are scheduled around d around the thefuel fuelhandling handlingsystemssystemsto tothe thegreatest greatestextent extentpossible possible. . TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev.00 DecommissioningCost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 2, Page 11 of Page 2, 11 of14 14 41 In the In the SAFSTOR SAFSTORscenario, scenario,the theISFSI ISFSIbuilt built to to support support operations operations is is expande expanded to d to permit permit offloading offloadingof ofthe the spent spent fuel fuel pool pool in in support of of the decommissioning the decommissioning program. program.
.. Draining and Draining and de-ener de-energizing gizing of of the the non-contaminated non-contaminated systems systems not not required to support required to support continuedcontinued site site operations operations or or maintenance.
maintenance. e Disposingofofcontaminated Disposing contaminatedfilter filterelements elementsand and resin resin beds beds notnot required for required for processing processing wasteswastes from from layup layup activities activities for future for future operations. operations.
@ Draining of Draining of the the reactor reactor vessel, vessel, with with the the internals internals left in place place and and the the vessel head secured.
II' Draining and de-ener Draining gizing non-ess de-energizing non-essential, contaminated ential, contami systems nated systems with deconta with minationas decontamination as required required for for future future mainten maintenance ance and and inspectio inspection. n. s Preparing lighting Preparing lighting and alarm systems and alarm systems whose whose continu continued ed use use is IS required; de-energ required; izing portions de-energizing protection, portions of fire protecti electric power, on, electric power, and HVAC systems whose HVAC systems whose continued continued useuse isis not required. required.
- Cleaning of Cleaning of the loose loose surface surface contami contamination from building nation from building access access pathway pathways. s.
- Perform Performing ing anan interim radiatio radiation survey of n survey of plant, posting posting warning warning signs where appropri appropriate.ate.
- Erecting physical physical barriers barriers and/or and/or securing securingall allaccess accesstotoradioact radioactive ive or contam inated contaminated areas, areas, except except as as require required d forfor inspect inspectionion andand mainten maintenance.ance.
II Installin Installingg security security and and surveill surveillance monitoring ance monitor equipment ing equipm and ent and relocatin relocating g security fence fence around secured structures, as required. structures, as required. 2.2.2 2.2.2 Period Period 22 -- Dorman Dormancy cy The The second second phase identifie identified d by the NRC NRC in its its rule rule addresse addresses licensed s licensed activitie s during a storage activities during a storage period period andand isisapplicab applicable le toto the thedorman dormancy cy phases phases of ofthethedeferre deferredd decomm decommissioning alternatives. issioning alternat ives. DormanDormancy cy activitie activities s include include aa 24-hour 24-hoursecurity securityforce, force, preventi preventiveve and andcorrecti corrective ve mainten maintenance ance on on security security systems systems,, area area lighting lighting, generalbuilding
, general building mainten ance, heating and maintenance, heating and ventilation ventilati on ofofbuilding buildings, routineradiolog s, routine radiological ical inspecti inspections ons of of contam inated structur contaminated structures, maintenance es, mainten ance of of structur structural al integrity integrity,, and andaasitesiteenvironm ental and environmental andradiatio radiation monitoring n monitor program.
ing program . Residen Resident t mainten maintenance ance personn personnel el perform perform equipm equipment maintenance, ent mainten ance, inspecti inspection on activitie activities, s, routine routine services services toto maintai maintain safeconditio n safe conditions, ns, TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 2,2, Page Page 1212 of of 14 14 adequate lighting, adequate lighting, heating, heating, and ventilation,, and periodic and ventilation periodic preventive preventive maintenance on maintenance on essential essential site services. An environmental An environmentalsurveillance surveillanceprogramprogramisiscarriedcarried out during the out during the dormancyperiod dormancy periodtotoensure ensure that that releases of radioactive radioactive material to the the environment are environment are prevented prevented and/or and/or detected and detected and controlled.controlled. Appropriate emergency Appropriate emergencyprocedures proceduresare areestablished established and and initiated for for potential releases potential releases that exceedexceed prescribed prescribed limits. limits. The The environme environmental ntal surveillance program surveillance program constitutes constitutes an abbreviated an abbreviat ed version version of of thethe effect during program in effect during normal plant operations. Security during Security during the dormancy dormancy periodperiod is is conducted conducted primarily primarily to to prevent prevent unauthorized entry and unauthorized and toto protect protect the the public public from from the the consequen consequences ces of of their own their own actions. actions. TheThe security security fence, fence, sensors, sensors, alarms, alarms, and and other other surveillance equipment surveillance equipment provide provide security. security. Fire and radiation alarms Fire and radiation alarms are are also monitored monitored and and maintaine maintained.d. WhileWhile remote surveillance remote surveillan ce is is anan option, it option, it does does notnot offer offer the immediate immediate response response timetime of a physical physical presence. The The transfer of of the spent spent fuel fuel to to aa DOE DOE facility facility continues continues during this this period until complete. period until complete. Fuel Fuel isis shipped shipped from from the pool or the pool ISFSI or the ISFSI (dependin (dependingg upon upon thethe scenario). scenario). Mter After aa period period of of storage storage (such(such that that license termination termination is is accomplish accomplished ed within within 60 60 years years ofof final final shutdown) shutdown),, it is is required required that thatthethelicensee licensee submit submit applicatio applications to terminate ns to terminate the the license, along along withwith an an LTPLTP (described (described in in Section Section 2.1.2), 2.1.2), thereby thereby initiating initiating the the third thirdphase. phase. 2.2.3 2.2.3 Periods Periods 33 and and44--Delayed DelayedDecommis Decommissioning sioning Prior Prior to to the the commenc commencement ement of of decommis decommissioning operations, sioning operations , preparation preparations s are are undertaken undertakento toreactivate reactivatesite siteservices services and andprepare preparefor for decommis sioning.Preparations decommissioning. Preparations include include engineering engineering and planning,planning, aa detailed detailed site site characteriz ation, and characterization, andthetheassembly assemblyof ofaadecommis decommissioning sioning managem management ent organization. organization.Final Final planning planning for activities and for activities and the the writing writing of of activity activity specificat ions and specifications detailed procedure and detailed proceduress are are also also initiated initiatedatatthis thistime. time. Much Much of the work work in developing developing aa termination termination plan is is relevant relevant to to the the developme development nt of of the detailed detailed engineerin engineering plans and g plans andprocedure procedures. The
- s. The activities activities associated associated with withthis thisphase phaseand andthe thefollow-on follow-on decontamin decontaminationation and and dismantlin dismantling g processes processesare aredetailed detailedininSections Sections2.1.1 2.1.1andand2.1.2.
2.1.2.TheThe primary primarydifference difference between between the the sequences sequences anticipated anticipatedfor for the theDECON DECON TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev.00 DecommissioningCost Decommissioning Analysis CostAnalysis Section Section 2, Page 13 of 2, Page 13 of 14 14 and deferred and deferred scenarios scenariosisisthe the absence, absence,in inthe the latter, latter, ofof any any constraint constraint on the availability on the availability the of the fuel fuel storage facilities for for decommissioning. decommissioning. Variations in Variations in the length of of the dormancy dormancy period are expected expected to have little effect little effect upon upon the the quantities of of radioactive radioactive wastes generatedgenerated from from system and system and structure structure removalremoval operation operations. s. Given the Given the levels oflevels of radioactivity and radioactivity and spectrum of of radionuclid radionuclides es expected from from sixty years of plant of plant operation operation, , no no plant plant process process system system identified identified as as being being contamina contaminated ted upon upon final final shutdown shutdown will become become releasable releasable due due to the the decay period decay periodalone, alone,i.e.,i.e.,there there is is no no significant significant reduction reduction in in the waste generated from generated from the decommis decommissioning sioning activities. activities. However, However,due due toto the lower activity lower activity levels, levels, aa greater greater percentage percentage of of the volume can be the waste volume designated for off-site processing and designated and recovery. recovery. The delay in decommiss decommissioning ioning also also yields yields lower lower working working area area radiation radiation levels. AsAs such, such, the estimates estimates for for the thedelayed delayed scenarios scenarios incorporat incorporate e reduced ALARA controls for ALARA controls for the the lower lower occupational occupational exposure potential.potential. Although the initial Although initial radiation radiationlevels levelsdue duetoto60Co 60CO will will decrease decrease during during the dormancy period, the internal internalcomponent components s ofof the the reactor reactor vessel vessel willwill still exhibit exhibit sufficientl sufficientlyy high high radiation radiation dose dose rates to to require require remote remote sectioning under water sectioning water duedue to tothe thepresence presenceofoflong-lived long-lived radionuclid radionuclides es such as as 94Nb, 94Nb, 59Ni, 59Ni, and and 63Ni. 63Ni.Therefore, Therefore,the the dismantling procedures dismantling procedures described described for for the DECON DECON alternative would would still be be employed employed during deferred scenarios. Portions deferred scenarios. Portionsof of the the sacrificial sacrificial shield shield will still be will still be radioactive radioactive due due to the the presence presence of of activated activated trace trace elements elements with withlonglong half-lives (152Eu (152Eu and and 154Eu). Decontamination will 154Eu). Decontamination require controlled will require controlled removal and disposal. disposal. It It is is assumed assumedthat thatradioactive radioactivecorrosion corrosionproducts products on inner surfaces inner surfaces of of piping piping and and componen components will not ts will not have have decayed decayed to to levels levels that that will will permit permit unrestricte unrestricted d use useororallow allowconvention conventional removal. al removal. These systems systems and and componen components ts will will be be surveyed surveyed as as they theyare areremoved removed and and disposed disposed of of in in accordanc accordancee with with the theexisting existingradioactiv radioactive release e release criteria. criteria. 2.2.4 2.2.4 Period Period 55 -- Site Restoration Restoration Following Following completion completion of of decommiss decommissioning ioning operations operations,, site-restora site-restorationtion activities can activities can begin.begin. If the the site site structures structures are aretotobebedismantle dismantled, d, dismantlin dismantlingg as as aacontinuati continuation on ofofthe thedecommis decommissioning process isis sioning process clearly clearly the the most mostappropriat appropriate e and andcost-effect cost-effective option, as ive option, asdescribed describedinin Section Section 2.1.3. 2.1.3. TheThe basis basis for for the the dismantlin dismantling cost in g cost inthethedeferred deferred scenarios is consistent with scenarios is consistent withthat thatdescribed describedfor forDECON, DECON,presuming presumingthe the TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Power Stationn Docum DocumententE16-1 E16-16 40-006 640-00 6,, Rev. 00 Decommissio missioning ning Cost Cost Analys Analysis is Section 2, Page of14 14 of Page 14 14 removal remov al of struct structures ures and and site site facili facilitties ies to to aa nomi nomin nalaldepth depthofofthree threefeet feet below below grade grade and the limite limitedd resto restor ration ationof of the the site. site. TLG Servic TLG Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Decommissioning Analysis Section 3, Page Section 3, Page 1 of of 22
- 3. COST ESTIMATE The cost estimates The cost estimates prepared prepared for for decommissioning decommissioning Clinton Clinton consider consider the unique the unique features features of of the the site, site, including including the theNSSS, NSSS, power powergeneration generation systems, systems, support support
- services, services, site site buildings, buildings, and ancillary facilities.
facilities. The The basis basis of of the the estimates, estimates, including the sources sources of of information relied upon, upon, the the estimating estimatingmethodology methodologyemployed, employed, site-site-specific considerations,and specific considerations, andother other pertinent pertinent assumptions, assumptions, is described in this is described this section. 3.1 BASIS OF ESTIMATE BASIS The estimates The estimates were were developed developed with withsite-specific, site-specific, technical technical information information developed in developed in an an evaluation prepared prepared in in 2007. 2007. TheThe information information waswas reviewed reviewed for the current for current analysis analysis and andupdated updatedas asdeemed deemedappropriate. appropriate.The Thesite-specific site-specific considerations and considerations and assumptions assumptions used used in the the previous previous evaluation evaluation werewere also also revisited. Modifications were incorporated where were incorporated where newnew information information was was available or experience available experience fromfrom ongoing ongoing decommissioning decommissioning programs provided provided viable alternatives alternatives or orimproved improved processes. processes. 3.2 METHODOLOGY The methodology The methodology used used toto develop develop the estimates estimates follows follows the basic basic approach approach originally presented in the originally presented AIF/NESP-036 study the AIF/NESP-036 study report, report, "Guidelines "Guidelines for for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," 1191 and the Estimates,"[19] theDOE DOE "DecommissioningHandbook."[201 "Decommissioning Handbook. "[20] TheseThese documents present aa unit documents present unitfactor factormethod methodfor forestimating estimatingdecommissioning decommissioning activity costs, costs, which simplifies the estimating estimatingcalculations. calculations. Unit factors factors for for concrete removal ($/cubic concrete removal yard), steel ($/cubic yard), steel removal removal ($/ton), ($/ton) , and cutting cutting costs costs ($/inch) were developed ($/inch) were developedusingusinglocal locallabor laborrates. rates. The The activity-dependent activity-dependent costs costs were were estimated with with the the item itemquantities quantities(cubic (cubic yards yardsand andtons), tons),developed developed from from plant drawings and inventory inventory documents. documents. Removal Removal rates and and material material costs costs for for the the conventional conventional disposition disposition of components components and structures structures relied relied upon upon information information available available in in thetheindustry industrypublication, publication, "Building "Building Construction ConstructionCost CostData," Data,"published publishedbybyR.S. KS.Means.[211 MeansJ21] This This analysis analysis reflects reflects lessons lessons learned learned from from TLG's TLG's involvement involvement in in the the Shippingport Shippingport Station StationDecommissioning Decommissioning Project,Project, completed completed in in1989, 1989, asaswell wellasas the decommissioning decommissioning of of the the Cintichem Cintichem reactor, reactor, hothot cells, cells, and andassociated associated facilities, completedin facilities, completed in 1997. 1997. In In addition, addition, thethe planning planning and andengineering engineering for for the Pathfinder, Shoreham, Rancho Seco, Trojan, Yankee Pathfinder, Shoreham, Rancho Seco, Trojan, Yankee Rowe, Big Rock Rowe, Big Rock Point, Point, Maine Yankee, Yankee, Humboldt Humboldt Bay-3,Bay-3, Oyster Oyster Creek, Creek, Connecticut Connecticut Yankee, Yankee, and San Onofre-1 nuclear San Onofre-1 nuclear units have have provided additional insight into the provided additional insight into the TLG TLG Services, Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev.Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 3,3,Page Page 22 of of 22 22 process, the process, the regulatory regulatory aspects, aspects, and and the the technical technical challenges challenges of of decommissioning commercial decommissioning commercial nuclear nuclear units. The unit The unit factor factor method method provides provides aa demonstrable demonstrable basis basis for for establishing establishing reliable cost estimates. reliable cost estimates. The The detail provided in detail provided in the unit unit factors, factors, including including activity duration, activity duration, labor costs (by craft), craft), and equipment and and consumable consumable costs, costs, ensures that essential ensures essential elements elements havehave not been omitted. omitted. Appendix Appendix A presents the detailed development the development of of aa typical unit factor. factor. Appendix Appendix B B provides provides the values contained within values within oneone set set of of factors developed for for this this analysis. Work Difficulty Factors TLG has historically TLG historically applied applied workwork difficulty difficulty adjustment adjustment factors factors (WDFs) (WDFs) to to account for account for the the inefficiencies inefficiencies in in working working in in aa power power plant plant environment. environment. WDFs were WDFs were assigned assigned to to each each unique set set of of unit unit factors, factors, commensurate commensurate with with the inefficiencies associated with working working in confined, confined, hazardous hazardous environments. The Theranges rangesused usedforforthe theWDFs WDFsare areas asfollows: follows:
- Access Factor 10% to 20%20%
411 Respiratory Respira tory Protection Protection Factor Factor 10% to 50% lit Radiation/ALARA RadiationJALARA Factor 10% to 40% 40%
- Protective Clothing Clothing Factor Factor 10% to 30% 30%
411 Work Break Factor Factor 8.33% The The factors factors and and their their associated associated range range of ofvalues values were weredeveloped developed in in conjunction conjunction with AIF/NESP-036 study. with the AIF/NESP-036 study. The The application application of of the the factors factors isis discussed in more detail in that that publication. publication. Scheduling Program Durations Durations The unitunit factors, factors, adjusted adjusted by by the the WDFs
'0ffiFs as as described described above, above, are are applied applied against against the the inventory inventory of of materials materials to to beberemoved removedininthe theradiologically radiologically controlled controlled areas.
areas. The The resulting resulting man-hours, man-hours, or or crew-hours, crew-hours, are used used in in the the development development of the the decommissioning decommissioning program program schedule, schedule, using using resource resource loading loading and event event sequencing sequencing considerations. considerations. The Thescheduling schedulingof ofconventional conventional removal removal and and dismantling dismantling activities activitiesarearebased basedupon uponproductivity productivityinformation information available availablefromfrom thethe"Building "BuildingConstruction ConstructionCost CostData" Data"publication. publication. An An activity activity duration critical path duration critical path is is used used to to determine determine the the total total decommissioning decommissioning program programschedule. schedule.The Theschedule scheduleisis relied relied upon upon in in calculating calculating the the carrying carrying costs, costs, which which include include program program management, management, administration, administration, field field engineering, engineering, equipment equipment rental, and and support supportservices services such such asas quality qualitycontrol control and andsecurity. security.This Thissystematic systematicapproach approachfor forassembling assembling TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 3,3, Page Page 3 ofof 22 decommissioningestimates decommissioning estimates ensures ensures aa high high degree degree of confidence confidence In in the reliability of of the the resulting resulting cost estimate. 3.3 FINANCIAL FINANCIAL COMPONENTS COMPONENTS OF THE COST MODEL TLG's proprietary TLG's proprietary decommissioning decommissioning cost cost model, model, DECCER, DECCER, produces produces a number of distinct cost elements. These These direct direct expenditures, expenditures, however, however, do do not not comprise the comprise the total cost to accomplish the the project goal, i.e., project goal, i.e., license license termination termination and site restoration. Inherent Inherent in any any cost cost estimate estimate that does does notnot rely rely onon historical historical data is is the the inability to specify specify the precise precise source source of of costs imposed by factors such as as tool tool breakage, breakage, accidents, accidents, illnesses, illnesses,weather weatherdelays, delays,and andlabor laborstoppages. stoppages. In the DECCER DECCER cost cost model, model, contingency contingencyfulfills fulfillsthis this role. Contingency is added role. Contingency added to to each line item to to account account forfor costs costs that thatarearedifficult difficultororimpossible impossibleto todevelop develop analytically. Such Such costs costs are historically inevitable over the duration duration of of aa job job of of this therefore, this cost this magnitude; therefore, cost analysis analysis includes includes funds funds to to cover cover these these types of expenses. 3.3.1 Contingency The activity- and and period-dependent period-dependent costs costs are are combined combined to to develop develop the the total decommissioning decommissioning cost. cost. A A contingency contingency is is then applied applied on a line-a line-item basis, using using one one or or more more of of the the contingency contingency types types listed in in the the AIF/NESP-036 AIF/NESP-036 study. study. "Contingencies" "Contingencies" are are defined defined in in the theAmerican American Association of Cost Engineers Engineers "Project "Project and and Cost Cost Engineers' Engineers' Handbook[22} Handbook[221 asas"specific "specificprovision provisionfor forunforeseeable unforeseeable elements elements of cost cost within within the the defined defined project project scope; scope; particularly particularly important important where where previous experience experience relating relating estimates and and actual actual costs costs has has shown shown thatthat unforeseeable events events which which will will increase increasecostscostsare arelikely likelytotooccur." occur."TheThe cost cost elements elements in in this this analysis analysis are are based based upon upon idealideal conditions conditions and and maximum maximum efficiency; therefore, consistent efficiency; therefore, consistent withwith industry practice,practice, aa contingency factor has contingency factor has been been applied. applied. In In the AIF/NESP-036 study, the theAIF/NESP-036 the types of unforeseeable unforeseeable events that are likely to occur occur in in decommissioning decommissioning are are discussed discussed and and guidelines guidelines are provided provided for for percentage contingencyinineach percentage contingency category. It eachcategory. It should should be be noted noted thatthat contingency, contingency, as as used used in this this analysis, analysis, doesdoes notnotaccount account for for price price escalation escalation and and inflation inflation in in the thecostcostofofdecommissioning decommissioning over over the the remaining remaining operating operatinglifelife of of the station. station. The useuse and and role roleofofcontingency contingency withinwithin decommissioning decommissioning estimates is is not aa "safety "safety factor factor issue." issue." Safety Safety factors factors provide provide additional additional security security and address address situations situations thatthatmay maynever never occur. occur. Contingency Contingency funds funds are are TLG TLG Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Analysis Cost Analysis Section Section 3,3, Page 4 of 22 expectedto expected to be be fully fully expended throughout the expended throughout the program. program. They They alsoalso provide assurance provide assurance thatthat sufficient sufficient funding funding is is available available to to accomplish accomplish the the intended tasks. intended tasks. An An estimate estimate without without contingency, contingency, or or from from which which contingencyhas contingency has been been removed, removed, can can disrupt disrupt the orderly orderly progression progression of of events and jeopardize events jeopardize aa successful successful conclusion conclusion to the the decommissioning decommissioning process. For example, the most technologically challenging most technologically challengingtask task in decommissioning aa commercial decommissioning commercial nuclear nuclear station station is the the disposition disposition of of the the reactor vessel and internal internal components, components, now highly radioactiveradioactive after a lifetime of of exposure exposure to to core core activity. activity. The The disposition disposition of of these these componentsforms components formsthe the basis basis of of the the critical critical path path (schedule) (schedule) for for decommissioning operations. Cost decommissioning Cost and schedule schedule are interdependent, interdependent, and any deviation and deviation in schedule schedule has aa significant significant impact impact on on cost cost forfor performing a specific specific activity. Disposition of Disposition of the the reactor reactor vessel internals involves vessel internals involves the underwater underwater cutting of complex complexcomponents componentsthat that are are highly highly radioactive. radioactive. Costs Costs are based upon upon optimum optimum segmentation, segmentation, handling,handling, and and packaging packaging scenarios. The The schedule schedule is is primarily primarily dependent dependent upon upon the turnaround time time forfor the the heavily heavily shielded shielded shipping shipping casks, casks, including including preparation, preparation, loading, and loading, and decontamination decontamination of of the the containers containers for for transport. transport. The The number of casks casks required required is a function function of the pieces generated pieces generated in the segmentation activity, activity, a value value calculated calculated on on optimum optimum performance performance of of the the tooling tooling employed employed in cutting cutting the thevarious varioussubassemblies. subassemblies. The The expected optimization, however, expected optimization, however,may may not not be be achieved, achieved, resulting resulting in in delays and additional additional program program costs. costs. For For this this reason, reason, contingency contingency must must be included to to mitigate mitigatethe theconsequences consequencesof ofthe theexpected expectedinefficiencies inefficiencies inherent inherent in in this thiscomplex complex activity, activity, along along withwithrelated relatedconcerns concerns associated with with thethe operation operation of ofhighly highlyspecialized specialized tooling, tooling, field field conditions, and water clarity.clarity. Contingency Contingency fundsfunds are an integral integral part part ofof the the total total cost cost to to complete complete the decommissioning decommissioning process. process.Exclusion Exclusionofofthis thiscomponent componentputs putsat at risk a successful completion completion of of the the intended intended tasks tasks and,and,potentially, potentially, subsequent related related activities. activities. For For this thisstudy, study,TLGTLG examined examined the the major major activity-related problems problems (decontamination, (decontamination, segmentation, segmentation, equipmentequipment handling, packaging, packaging, transport, and waste waste disposal) disposal) that necessitate necessitate aa contingency. Individual Individualactivity activitycontingencies contingenciesranged rangedfromfrom10% 10%toto75%, 75%, depending depending on on the degree degree of of difficulty difficulty judged judged to be be appropriate appropriate from from TLG's TLG's actual actual decommissioning decommissioning experience. experience. The The contingency contingency values values used used inin this thisstudy studyare areasasfollows: follows: TLG TLG Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 0 Cost Analysis Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page of 22 Page 55 of Decontamination 50% Contaminated Component Contaminated Component Removal Removal 25% Contaminated Component Packaging 10% Contaminated Component Component Transport 15% Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Low-Level Radioactive Disposal 25% Reactor Segmentation Reactor Segmentation 75% NSSS Component Component Removal 25% Reactor Waste Reactor Waste Packaging 25% Reactor Waste Transport 25% Reactor Vessel Reactor Vessel Component Disposal 50% GTCC Disposal 15% Non-Radioactive Component Removal 15% Heavy Equipment and and Tooling Tooling 15% Supplies 25% Engineering 15% Energy 15% Characterization and and Termination Termination Surveys Surveys 30% Construction 15% Taxes and Fees 10% Insurance 10% Staffing 15% The contingency values are contingency values are applied to thethe appropriate appropriate components components of of the estimates on on aa line line item item basis. basis. AAcomposite composite value value isis then then reported reported at the the end endofofeach each estimate. estimate. For Forexample, example,thethecomposite compositecontingency contingency value value reported reported forfor the the DECON DECON alternative alternative isis 18.5%. 18.5%. Values Values for for the the other other alternatives alternatives are delineated delineated within within the detailed detailed cost cost tables tables inin Appendices D and E. 3.3.2 Financial Financial Risk Risk In addition addition to to the theroutine routineuncertainties uncertaintiesaddressed addressedby bycontingency, contingency, another cost cost element element thatthat isissometimes sometimes necessary necessary to to consider consider when when bounding bounding decommissioning decommissioning costs costsrelates relatestoto uncertainty, uncertainty, or or risk. risk. Examples can include include changes changes in inwork workscope, scope, pricing, pricing, job job performance, performance, and other other variations variationsthatthatcould couldconceivably, conceivably, but but not notnecessarily, necessarily, occur. occur. Consideration is sometimes sometimes necessary necessary to to generate generateaalevel levelofofconfidence confidence in the the estimate, estimate, within within aa range rangeof ofprobabilities. probabilities. TLGTLGconsiders considers these these types ofof costs costs under the the broad broad term term"financial "financial risk." risk." Included Included within within the category category of financial risk are: are: TLG TLG Services, Inc.
Power Station Clinton Power Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Decommissioning Analysis Section Section 3,3, Page Page 66 of of2222
~ Transition activities activities and and costs:
costs: ancillary ancillary expenses expenses associated associated withwith eliminating eliminating 50% 50% to to 80% 80% of of the the site labor labor force force shortly shortly after the the cessation cessation of of plant operations, operations, addedadded cost cost for for worker worker separation separation packages packages throughout throughout the the decommissioning decommissioning program, program, national national or or company-mandated company-mandated retraining,retraining, and and retention retention incentives incentives for for key key personnel.
~ Delays Delays in in approval approval of of thethe decommissioning decommissioning plan plan duedue to to intervention, intervention, public public participation participation in in local localcommunity community meetings, meetings, legal challenges, and national national and andlocal local hearings.
hearings. 110 Changes Changes in in the the project project work work scope scope from from the the baseline baseline estimate, estimate, involving involving thethe discovery discovery of of unexpected unexpected levels levels of ofcontaminants, contaminants, contamination in in places places not not previously previously expected, expected, contaminated contaminatedsoil soil previously undiscovered (either previously undiscovered (either radioactive radioactive or or hazardous hazardous material material contamination), variations in plant inventory contamination), variations inventory or or configuration configuration not not indicated by the as-built as-built drawings. drawings.
<<I Regulatory changes (e.g.,
Regulatory changes (e.g., affecting affecting worker worker health health and safety, safety, site site release criteria, waste waste transportation, transportation,and anddisposal). disposal).
<<I Policy decisions Policy decisionsaltering altering national national commitments commitments (e.g., (e.g., in in the ability to to accommodate accommodate certain certain waste waste forms forms for for disposition disposition or or in in the the timetable for such, for for such, for example, example, in in the the start start and and rate rateofofacceptance acceptance spent fuel by the of spent the DOE).
DOE).
<<I Pricing changes Pricing changes for for basic basic inputs, such as as labor, labor, energy, energy, materials, materials, and burial.
This cost This study does cost study not add does not any additional add 'any additional cost to the estimate cost to estimate for for financial risk since financial since there is is insufficient insufficient historical data from from which which to project future project future liabilities. Consequently, Consequently, the areas of of uncertainty uncertainty or or risk risk are revisited periodically periodically andand addressed through repeated revisions revisions or updates of the base estimate. 3.4 SITE-SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS SITE-SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS There are aa number number of of site-specific site-specific considerations considerations that that affect affect the the method method for for dismantling and dismantling and removal removal of of equipment equipmentfrom fromthe the site site and the the degree degree of of restoration required. The The cost impact of the considerations considerations identified identified below below is included in this cost study. 3.4.1 Spent Fuel Management cost to The cost to dispose dispose ofof spent spent fuel fuel generated generated from from plant operations is not not reflected within reflected within thethe estimates estimates to to decommission decommission the the Clinton Clinton site. site. TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
Station Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Document E16-1640-006, Decommissioning Cost Analysis Decommissioning Section 3, Page 77 of of 22 Ultimate disposition Ultimate disposition of of the the spent spent fuel fuel is within within the the province province of of the the DOE's Waste DOE's Waste Management System, as defined by the NWPA. NWPA. As As such, such, the disposal cost is financedfinanced by by aa 1 mill/kWhr milllkWhr surcharge paid into the the DOE's waste DOE's waste fundfund during during operations. operations. However, However, the NRC NRC requires requires licensees to licensees to establish a program program to to manage manage and and provide provide funding funding for for the the management of management of all all irradiated irradiated fuel fuel at the reactors until title title ofof the the fuel fuel is transferred transferred to to the the Secretary Secretary of of Energy. Energy. ThisThis funding funding requirement requirement is is fulfilled through fulfilled through inclusion inclusion of of certain high-level high-level waste cost cost elements elements within the estimate, estimate, as asdescribed described below. below. The total inventory The inventory of of assemblies assemblies that that will willrequire require handling handling during during decommissioningisis based decommissioning based upon upon several assumptions. assumptions. The The pickup pickup of of commercialfuel commercial fuelisis assumed assumed to to begin begin in in the the year year 2025. 2025. The The maximum maximum rate at which rate which the the fuel fuel isis removed removed from from the commercial commercial sites is based based upon an annual capacity upon capacity at at the the geologic geologic repository repository ofof 3,000 3,000 metric metric tons tons of uranium uranium (MTU).(MTU). Any Any delay delay in the the startup startup of of the the repository repository or or decrease in the decrease the rate rate ofofacceptance acceptance will willcorrespondingly correspondingly prolong prolong the the process and result in the fuel remaining at transfer process at the the site site longer. longer. In all all three three scenarios, scenarios, the the ISFSI ISFSI willwill continue continue to to operate operate until until such such time time that the the transfer transfer of ofspent spent fuelfuel totothe theDOE DOEcan canbe becompleted. completed. Assuming that that the theDOE DOE commences commences repository repository operation operation in in 2025, 2025, fuel fuel is projected projected to to be removed removed from from thethe Clinton Clinton site by the year year 2064. 2064. In In the Delayed Delayed DECON scenario,the DECON scenario, the ISFSI ISFSI is is only only used used to to store store fuel fuel placed during plant plant operations. operations. Spent Spentfuelfueloff-loaded off-loaded fromfrom the the reactor reactor after operations cease,cease, remains in the the pool pool during the the transfer transferperiod. period. The inventory The inventory of of fuel fuel assemblies assemblies locatedlocated in in the the spent spent fuel fuel pool pool is is preferentially preferentially off-loaded off-loaded as the allocations permit. permit. Operation Operation and maintenance maintenance costs costs for for the storage storage facilities facilities (the (the ISFSI ISFSI and the the pool pool for the Delayed Delayed DECON scenario) scenario) areare included within the the estimates estimates and addressaddress the the cost cost for for staffing staffing the facilities, facilities, as well well asas security, insurance, and and licensing licensing fees. fees. The The estimates estimatesinclude include the thecosts costs to purchase (DECON (DECON and SAFSTOR scenarios), load, SAFSTOR scenarios), load, andand transfer transfer the the fuel storage canisters. Costs Costs are are also also provided provided forfor the the final final disposition disposition of the facilities once the transfertransferisiscomplete. complete. Repository Startup Repository Startup The The current current administration administration has cut cut the thebudget budgetfor forthe thegeological geological repository program, but but has has also alsoappointed appointedaaBlue BlueRibbon RibbonCommission Commission on America's America's Nuclear Future Future to to make make recommendations recommendations for for aa new new plan plan for nuclear nuclear waste waste disposal. disposal. That That Commission's Commission's charter includes includes aa TLG TLG Services, Inc.
Station Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Document E16-1640-006, Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 8 ofof 22 requirement that thatthetheCommission Commission consider consider "options "options for for safe storage storage ofof used nuclear fuel used fuel while while final disposition disposition pathways pathways are selectedselected and deployed."For deployed." For example, example,itit is is possible possible that that the NRC NRC couldcould license an interim storage facility, facility, such as that that proposed proposed by by Private Private Fuel FuelStorage, Storage, within a relatively short short time time frame, frame, at at least least by by 2025. 2025. Spent Fuel Management Management Model Model The Exelon The nuclear fleet Exelon nuclear fleet consists consistsof of21 21 units units at at 11 11 sites sites in in Illinois, Illinois, Pennsylvania,and Pennsylvania, and NewNew Jersey, Jersey, including including the the inactive units at inactive units at Dresden, Peach Dresden, Peach Bottom Bottom and and Zion Zion (Zion (Zionisis stillstill included included in the spent spent fuel analysis model fuel since the fuel model since fuel transfer to to DOE DOE willwill still be be done done asas part of of the Exelon allocation). The ability the Exelon allocation). The ability to complete the to complete the decommissioningofofthese decommissioning theseunits, units, particularly particularly for for the DECON DECON and and Delayed DECON Delayed DECON alternatives, alternatives, isis highly highly dependent dependent upon upon when when the the DOE is assumed to remove spent DOE spent fuel fuel from the sites. sites. The DOE's The DOE's repository programassumes repository program assumesthat that spent spent fuel fuel will will bebe accepted for accepted for disposal disposal from from the the nation's nation's commercial commercial nuclear nuclear plants in in the order order (the(the "queue")
"queue") in in which which ititwas wasremoved removedfrom fromservice service("oldest
("oldest fuel first").[23] first")J23] A A computer computer model model developed developed by by Exelon Exelon Nuclear Nuclear was was used used to determine determine when the DOE would provide allocations in the when the DOE would provide allocations in the queue for queue for removal removal of of spent spent fuel fuel from from the the individual individual sites. Repository Repository operations were based upon annual annual industry-wide industry-wide receipt receipt ofof 400 400 Metric Tons Heavy Tons Heavy MetalMetal (MTHM) (MTHM)ininthe the first first year year of of operation, operation, aa total of of 3,800 MTHM 3,800 MTHMin in years years 22 through 44 and and 3,000 3,000 MTHM MTHM for for year 55 and and beyond.[24] beyond.[24) ISFSIs ISFSls are are constructed constructed as as necessary necessary to tomaintain maintainfull-core full-coredischarge discharge capability capability at at the the individual individual sites.sites. Once Once the theDOE DOEbegins beginsrepository repository operations, queue allocations allocations are used used to to ship ship spent spentfuel fuelfrom from Exelon's Exelon's operating sites. Spent Spent fuel fuel shipments shipments are are thenthen mademade from from decommissioning sites in the order order of retirement. of retirement. Canister Canister Design Design The The design design and capacity capacity of of the the ISFSI ISFSI is is based based uponupon thethe Holtec Holtec FW FW vertical cask system, with with anan 89 89 fuel fuel assembly assembly capacity. capacity. A unitunit cost cost of of
$1.256 million is
$1.256 million is used used for for pricing pricing the dry dry storage storage caskcask system.
system. TheThe DOE DOE is assumed to to provide provide the the MPC MPC for for fuel transferred transferreddirectly directlyfrom from the pool pool to the DOE,DOE, withwith thethe same same 89 89 fuel fuel assembly assembly capacity, capacity, atat no no cost to the owner. the owner. TLG TLG Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640- 006, Rev. Rev. 0 Cost Analysis Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page of 22 Page 99 of Canister Loading and Transfer An average An average cost cost ofof $250,000
$250,000isis usedused forforthe the labor labor toto load/transport the spent fuel spent fuel from from the the pool pool toto the the ISFSI ISFSI pad, pad, based basedupon uponExelon Exelon experience. For For estimating purposes,50%
estimating purposes, 50%ofofthis this cost cost isis used used to to estimate the cost cost to transfer transfer the the fuel fuel from from the ISFSI ISFSI to to the the DOE. DOE. Operations and Maintenance Annual costs costs (excluding (excluding labor) of approximately $777,243 $777,243 and $91,366
$91,366 are used for operation and maintenance of the spent spent fuel fuel pool pool and thethe ISFSI, respectively.
ISFSI Design Considerations A multi- purpose (storage multi-purpose (storage and transport) transport) dry shielded storage storage canister canister with a vertical, vertical, reinforced concrete storage reinforced concrete storage module moduleisis used used as as a basis basis for the cost analysis. for analysis. TheThe final final core core off off load, load, equivalent equivalent to to 88modules, modules, are assumed are assumed to have have some some level level of ofneutron -induced activation neutron-induced activation as as a result of the long- term storage of the fuel (i.e., to levels long-term levels exceeding exceeding free-free-release release limits). limits). The The cost of the disposition disposition of of this material, material, as wellwell asas the demolition of the ISFSI facility, is included in the the estimate. estimate. Vessel and Internal 3.4.2 Reactor Vessel Internal Components Components The NSSSNSSS (reactor (reactor vessel vessel and and reactor reactorrecirculation recirculation systemsystem components) will components) will be be decontaminated decontaminated using chemical chemical agents prior to the start of of cutting cutting operations operations (for (for DECON DECON alternative alternative only).only). A A decontamination factor (average reduction) decontamination factor (average reduction) of 10 is of 10 is assumed for the for the process. The The reactor pressure pressure vessel vessel and and internal internalcomponents components are are segmented segmented for for disposal disposal inin shielded, shielded, reusable reusable transportation casks. Segmentation Segmentation is performed in the dryer-separator pool, pool, where aa turntable turntable and and remote remote cutter are are installed. installed. The vessel vessel is segmented segmented in place, place, using aa mast-mast-mounted cutter supported mounted cutter supported off off thethe lower head and lower head and directed directed from from aa shielded work work platform platform installed installed overhead overhead in the the reactor reactorcavity. cavity. Transportation cask cask specifications specifications and transportation transportation regulations regulations willwill dictate segmentation segmentation and andpackaging packagingmethodology. methodology. The The dismantling dismantling of the the reactor reactor internals internals will willgenerate generateradioactive radioactive waste considered unsuitable for shallow land disposal considered unsuitable for shallow land disposal (i.e., GTCC). (i.e., Although the material material is notnot classified classified as as high-level high-level waste, waste, thethe DOE DOE TLG Services, Inc. TLG Inc.
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Cost Analysis Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page Page 1010 of of 22 has indicated it will will accept accept this waste waste for disposal disposal at the futurefuture high-high-level waste repository.[25] waste repository.l25] However, However, the the DOE DOE has not been been forthcoming forthcoming with an acceptance acceptance criteria or or disposition disposition schedule schedule for for this material, material, and numerous questions remain numerous questions remain as as to the ultimate ultimate disposal cost disposal cost and and waste form waste form requirements. requirements. As As such, such, for for purposes purposes of of this this study, study, the GTCC has GTCC has been been packaged packaged and disposed of of as as high-level high-level waste, waste, at at a cost equivalent to equivalent to that envisioned envisioned for for the the spent fuel. fuel. It isis not not anticipated anticipated that the that the DOE DOE would would accept accept this waste prior to completingcompleting the the transfer of spent of spent fuel. fuel. Therefore, Therefore, untiluntil such such time time the DOE DOE is ready ready to to accept accept GTCC waste, GTCC waste, itit is is reasonable reasonable to to assume assume that that this this material materialwould would remain in storage at the the Clinton Clinton site. site. Intact disposal Intact disposal of the the reactor reactor vessel vessel and and internal internal components components can can provide savings provide savings in in cost cost and and worker worker exposure exposure by by eliminating eliminating the the complex segmentation requirements, complex requirements, isolation of the GTCC GTCC material, and transport/storage and transport/storage of of the the resulting resulting wastewaste packages. packages. Portland Portland General Electric General Electric (PGE) (PGE) was able to dispose dispose of of the the Trojan Trojan reactor reactor as as an an intact package. However,However, its itslocation locationon onthetheColumbia ColumbiaRiver River simplified simplified the transportation analysis analysis since: since:
~ the reactor reactor package package could could be be secured secured to to the transport transport vehicle for vehicle for the the entire journey, journey, i.e.,i.e., the package package was was notnot lifted during transport,
!II there were were no no man-made man-made or or natural natural terrain terrain features features between the plantplant site site and and thethedisposal disposal location location that thatcould could produce a large drop, and
.. transport speeds speeds were were veryvery low, low, limited limited by by the the overland overland transport transport vehicle vehicle and and the the river river barge.
barge. As As a member member of the Northwest Compact, Compact, PGE PGE had a site site available available forfor disposal of the package -- the the USUS Ecology facility in Washington State. Ecology facility State. The characteristics of this and aridsite siteproved proved favorable favorable in in demonstrating demonstrating compliance compliance with land disposal regulations. regulations. It is is notnot known known whether whether thisthisoption optionwill willbebeavailable available when whenClinton Clinton ceases operation. Future viability ceases operation. viability of this option option will will depend depend uponupon the the ultimate ultimate location location of of the the disposal disposal site, site, asas well well as as the the disposal disposal sitesite licensee's licensee's ability to accept accept highly highly radioactive radioactive packages packages and and effectively effectively isolate isolate them them from from the theenvironment. environment. Additionally, Additionally, with with BWRs, BWRs, the the diameter of of the reactor reactor vessel vessel maymay severely severely limit limit overland overland transport. transport. Consequently, Consequently, the the study study assumes assumes the the reactor reactor vessel vessel will will require require segmentation, segmentation, as as aa bounding boundingcondition. condition. TLG TLG Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, PagePage 11 of 22 11 of Primary System 3.4.3 Primary System Components Components Reactor recirculation Reactor recirculationpipingpipingisis cutcut from from the reactor reactor vessel vessel onceonce the water level in the vessel (used for personnel shielding during water level in the vessel (used for personnel shielding during dismantling and dismantling and cutting cutting operations operations in in and and around around the the vessel) vessel) is is dropped below the nozzle nozzle zone. The piping is is boxed boxed and and transported transported by shielded van. The The reactor reactor recirculation recirculation pumps pumps and motors motors are lifted lifted out intact, packaged, packaged, and and transported transportedfor for processing processing and/or and/or disposal. disposal. 3.4.4 Main Turbine and Condenser The main turbine will The will be be dismantled dismantled using using conventional conventional maintenance maintenance procedures. The turbine rotors rotors and shafts will be removed to aa laydown and shafts will be removed to laydown area. The The lower lower turbine turbine casings casings willwill be be removed removed from from their their anchors anchors by by controlled demolition. controlled demolition. The The main condensers will also be be disassembled disassembled and moved and moved to to aa laydown laydown area. area. Material Material is is then then prepared prepared for for transportation to transportation to an anoff-site off-site recycling recycling facility where it will be surveyed and designated and designated for for either eitherdecontamination decontamination or or volume volume reduction, reduction, conventional disposal, conventional disposal, or or controlled controlled disposal. disposal. Components Components will will bebe packaged packaged and and readied readied for for transport in in accordance accordance with with the intended intended disposition. Transportation Methods 3.4.5 Transportation Methods Contaminated piping, Contaminated piping, components, components,and andstructural structural material material other than the the highly highly activated activated reactor reactor vessel vessel andand internal internalcomponents components will will qualify as LSA-I, LSA-I, II or III or Surface Contaminated ContaminatedObject, Object, SCO-I SCO-I or or II, II, as as described described in in Title Title49.[26] 49)26] The The contaminated contaminated material material will will bebe packaged packaged in in Industrial Industrial Packages Packages (IP (IP 1,1, IP-2, IP-2, or or IP-3, IP-3, as defined defined in subpart 173.411) 173.411) forfor transport transport unless demonstrated to qualify qualify as their their own own shipping containers. The reactor reactor vessel vessel andand internal internalcomponents components are expected to be be transported in in accordance accordance with §71, §71, as TypeType B. B. It It is is conceivable conceivable that that the reactor, reactor, due due toto its itslimited limitedspecific specific activity, activity, could could qualify qualify as as LSA LSA II II or III. III. However, However, the high high radiation radiation levelslevels on on the the outer surface surface would would require that that additional additional shielding shielding be be incorporated incorporated within the packaging packaging so so as as toto attenuate attenuatethe thedose dosetotolevels levelsacceptable acceptable for transport. Transport Transport of of the highly highly activated activated metal, metal, produced produced in in the the segmentation segmentation of the reactor reactor vessels vessels andand internal internalcomponents, components, will will bebe by by shielded shielded truck cask. cask. Cask Cask shipments shipments may mayexceed exceed95,00095,000 pounds, pounds, including including vessel vessel segment(s), segment(s), supplementary supplementary shielding,shielding, cask cask tie-downs, tie-downs, and and tractor-trailer. The The maximum maximum level level of activity activity per shipment assumed assumed TLG TLG Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Document E16-1640-006, Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 12 of 22 12 of permissible was based upon the license license limits limits ofof the the available available shielded shielded transport casks. casks. The Thesegmentation segmentation scheme scheme for for the vessel vessel and internal internal segments is designed to meet these limits. The transport of The of large large intact intact components components (e.g., (e.g., large large heat heat exchangers exchangers and other other oversized oversized components) components) will will be be by by aa combination combination of of truck, truck, rail, and/or and/or multi-wheeled transporter. Truck multi-wheeled transporter. Truck transport costs costs were were estimated using estimated usingpublished publishedtariffs tariffsfrom fromTri-State Tri-StateMotor MotorTransit.[27] TransitJ27] Low-Level Radioactive 3.4.6 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Disposal To the To the greatest greatest extent extent practical, practical, metallic metallic material generated generated in in the the decontamination and decontamination and dismantling dismantling processes processes isis treated treated to reduce reduce thethe volume requiring total volume requiring controlled disposal. The controlled disposal. The treated material, material, meeting the meeting the regulatory and/or site regulatory and/or site release release criterion, criterion, is is released released as as scrap, requiring scrap, requiring no no further further cost costconsideration. consideration. Conditioning Conditioning and and recoveryofofthe recovery the waste waste stream stream is is performed performed off off site site at aa licensed licensed processing center. The massmass of of radioactive radioactive waste waste generated generated duringduring the the various various decommissioning activities is reported decommissioning reported by by line-item line-itemin inAppendices AppendicesC, C,DD and E, andand summarized summarized in in Section Section 5. 5. The The Section Section 5 waste summaries summaries are consistent consistent with with 1010 CFR CFR §61§61 classifications. Commercially Commercially available steel containers are used used for for the the disposal disposal of of piping, piping, small small components, components, and concrete. concrete. Larger components components can can serve serve as their theirownowncontainers, containers, with proper closure of all openings, openings, access access ways, ways, and penetrations. penetrations. The The waste volumes volumes are calculated on the the exterior package dimensions for exterior package dimensions for containerized material or containerized material or aa dimensional dimensionalcalculation calculationfor forcomponents components serving as their their own own waste containers. containers. The The moremore highly highly activated activatp-d reactor reactor components components are are transported transported in in reusable, reusable, shielded shielded truck casks casks with with disposable disposable liners. liners. InIn calculating calculating disposal costs, costs, thethe burial fees fees are applied against the the liner liner volume volume and and weight, weight, with surcharges surcharges added for for the special special handling handling requirements requirements and and thethe radiological radiological characteristics characteristics of of the the payload. payload. Packaging Packaging efficiencies are lower for the highly activated efficiencies are lower for the highly activated materials materials (greater than than Type A A quantity waste), where where high high concentrations concentrations of of gamma-emitting gamma-emitting radionuclides limit the the capacity capacity of of the shipping shipping canisters. canisters. Disposal fees are Disposal fees are calculated calculated using current disposal disposal agreements, agreements, with with surcharges surcharges addedadded forfor the the highly highlyactivated activatedcomponents, components, for forexample, example, generated in in the the segmentation segmentationof ofthe the reactor reactorvessel. vessel. The Thecost cost to to dispose dispose of of the majority majority of of the the material material generated generated from from thethedecontamination decontamination TLG Services, Inc. TLG
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Section 3, Page Page 13 of22 13 of 22 and dismantling activities is based and dismantling upon activities Exelon's is based current upon Exelon's disposal current disposal agreement withwith EnergySolutions EnergySolutions for for its its facility facility in Clive, Clive, Utah. EnergySolutions facility EnergySolutions facility isis not not able able to accept accept the higher activityactivity waste waste (Class B (Class B and C) C) generated in the decontamination decontamination of of the reactor reactor vessel vessel and segmentation segmentation of of the the components components closestclosest to to the thecore. core. As As aa proxy proxyfor for future disposal future disposal facilities, facilities, waste waste disposal costs for disposal costs for the higher higher activity activity waste (Class B and C) C) are based upon the last last published published raterateschedule schedule for non-compact for non-compact waste waste forfor the the Barnwell facility, facility, adjusted for escalation the Atlantic Compact rates. of the Material exceeding Class C exceeding Class C limits limits (limited (limited to to material closest closest to to the the reactor reactor core core and comprising comprising aa small small percentage percentage of the the total total waste waste volume) volume) is is generally generally not not suitable suitable for for shallow-land shallow-land disposal. disposal. ThisThis material is packaged material packaged in the the samesamemultipurpose multipurpose canisterscanisters used used for for spent fuel storage/transport storage/transportand anddesignated designatedfor forgeologic geologicdisposal. disposal. 3.4.7 Site Conditions Conditions Following Following Decommissioning Decommissioning The NRC The will terminate NRC will terminate (or (or amend) amend) the site site license license ifif it it determines determines that site site remediation remediation has has been beenperformed performed in in accordance accordance with with thethe license termination license termination plan, plan, and and that the the terminal terminal radiation radiation survey survey andand associated documentation associated documentation demonstrate demonstrate that that the facility facility is suitable suitable forfor release. The NRC'sNRC's involvement in in the the decommissioning decommissioning process process will will end at this this point. point. Building Buildingcodes codes and andenvironmental environmental regulations regulations willwill dictate the next dictate next step step ininthe thedecommissioning decommissioning process, process, as wellwell asas the the own future owner's own future plans for the site. Non-essential structures or buildings severely damaged damaged in in decontamination process decontamination process are removed removed to to aa nominal depth of of three feet feet below grade. Concrete below grade. Concrete rubble rubble generated generated from from demolition demolition activities activities is is processed processed and and made made available available as cleanclean fill. fill. The The excavations excavations will will bebe regraded regraded suchsuch that the the power power blockblock area will will have have aa final final contour contour consistent with adjacent surroundings. estimates do The estimates do not assume assume the the remediation remediationof of any any significant significant volume volume of contaminated soil. This assumption may be of contaminated soil. This assumption may be affected by continuedaffected by continued plant plant operations and/or future operations and/or future regulatory regulatory actions,actions, such such as as thethe development of site-specific site-specific release release criteria. TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev.Rev. 0 Decommissioning Decommissioning CostCost Analysis Analysis Section Section 3,3, Page Page 14 of of 22 3.5 ASSUMPTIONS The following The followingare are the the major major assumptions assumptions made made in the the development development of the estimates for decommissioning the site. 3.5.1 Estimating Basis The study follows The follows the principles principles of of ALARA through the use ALARA through use of ofwork work duration adjustment duration adjustment factors. factors. These These factors factors address address the the impact impact of of activities such as radiological protection instruction, mock-up mock-up training, and the and the use use ofofrespiratory respiratoryprotection protection andandprotective protective clothing. clothing. The The factors lengthen factors lengthen aa task's duration, duration, increasing increasing costs costs and and lengthening lengthening the overall overall schedule. schedule. ALARA planning is ALARA planning is considered considered in in the costs costs forfor engineeringand engineering and planning, planning, and and inin the thedevelopment development of of activity activity specifications and specifications and detailed procedures. procedures. Changes Changes to to worker worker exposure exposure limits may may impact impact thethe decommissioning decommissioning cost cost and and project project schedule. schedule. 3.5.2 Labor Costs The craft labor required to to decontaminate decontaminate and dismantle dismantle the the nuclear nuclear unit will be acquired through standard site contracting practices. acquired through practices. The The current cost cost ofof labor labor atat the the site site is is used used asas an estimating basis. basis. Costs Costs for site for site administration, administration, operations, operations, construction, construction, and and maintenance maintenance personnel personnel are are based based upon upon average average salary salaryinformation information provided provided by by Exelon or fromfrom comparable comparable industry industry information. Exelon Exelon will hire hire aa Decommissioning Decommissioning Operations Operations Contractor Contractor(DOC) (DOC) to to manage manage the the decommissioning. decommissioning. The The owner owner will provide provide site site security, security, radiological radiological healthhealth andand safety, safety, quality quality assurance assurance and and overall overall sitesite administration administration during during thethe decommissioning decommissioning and and demolition demolition phases. phases. Contract personnel will provide provide engineering engineering services services (e.g., (e.g., for for preparing preparing the the activity activityspecifications, specifications, work work procedures, procedures, activation, activation, and and structural structuralanalyses) analyses)under underthe thedirection directionofofExelon. Exelon. 3.5.3 Design Conditions Conditions Any fuel fuel cladding cladding failure failure that occurred occurred during the lifetime lifetime of the plant plant is assumed assumed to to have have released releasedfission fission products products atatsufficiently sufficientlylow low levels levels that thatthethebuildup buildupofofquantities quantities of of long-lived long-lived isotopes isotopes(e.g., 137Cs, (e.g., 90S r , or 137CS,90Sr, or transuranics) transuranics) has hasbeen beenprevented preventedfrom fromreaching reachinglevels levelsexceeding exceeding those those that that permit permit the themajor majorNSSSNSSS components components to be shippedshipped under current current transportation transportationregulations regUlationsand anddisposal disposalrequirements. requirements. TLG TLG Services, Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 3,3,Page Page 15 of 22 22 The curie The curie contents contents of of the the vessel vessel and and internals internals at finalfinal shutdown shutdown are are derived derived from from those listed listedininNUREG/CR-3474.[25] NUREG/CR-34 7 4,[28] Actual Actualestimates estimates areare derived derived from fromthethe curie/gram curie/gram values values contained contained therein therein and adjusted adjusted forfor the the different mass of of the the Clinton Clinton components, components, projected projected operating operating life,life, and different and different periods periods of of decay. decay. Additional Additional short-lived short-lived isotopes isotopes werewere derived CR-0130[29] and derived from CR-0130129 CR-0672,[30] and and CR-0672,[30] andbenchmarked benchmarked to to the long-lived values long-lived values from CR-3474. CR-3474. The disposal The disposal cost cost for for the control blades removed removed from from the the vessel vessel with the core load was included the final core included within the the estimates. estimates. Disposition Disposition of of any blades stored any blades stored in in the thepool pool from from operations operations was was considered considered an an operating expense and therefore not not accounted accounted for in the estimates. estimates. Activation of of the the reactor building structure structure isis confined confined to to the the sacrificial sacrificial shield. 3.5.4 General Transition Activities Transition Activities Existing warehouses Existing warehouses will will be cleared of be cleared of non-essential non-essential material material and and remain for use by Exelon Exelon and and its its subcontractors. subcontractors. The The plant's plant's operating operating staff will perform the following following activities at no no additional additional costcost oror credit credit to the project during the transition transitionperiod: period:
- Drain Drain and and collect collect fuel fuel oils, oils, lubricating lubricating oils, oils, and and transformer transformeroils oilsfor for recycle and/or sale.
sale.
- Drain and and collect collect acids, acids, caustics, caustics, andand other other chemical chemical storesstores for for recycle and/or and/or sale.
sale.
- Processes operating waste Processes operating waste inventories, i.e., the estimates inventories, i.e., estimates do do not not address the address the disposition disposition of of any any legacy legacy wastes; wastes; the the disposal disposal of of operating wastes during operating wastes during this initial initial period period is is not notconsidered considered aa decommissioning decommissioning expense.
expense. Scrap Scrap and and Salvage Salvage The The existing existing plant plant equipment equipment isisconsidered considered obsolete obsolete and and suitable suitablefor for scrap scrap asas deadweight deadweightquantities quantitiesonly. only.Exelon Exelonwill willmake makeeconomically economically reasonable reasonable efforts efforts to to salvage salvage equipment equipment following following final final plant plant shutdown. shutdown. However, However, dismantling dismantling techniques techniques assumed assumed by by TLGTLG forfor equipment equipment in in this this analysis analysisare arenot notconsistent consistentwithwithremoval removaltechniques techniques required required forfor salvage salvage (resale) (resale) of of equipment. equipment. Experience Experience has has indicated indicated TLG Services, Inc. TLG Services, Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev.Rev.00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Section Section 3,3,Page 16 of Page 16 of 22 22 that some buyers that some buyers wanted wanted equipment equipment stripped stripped downdown to to very veryspecific specific requirements requirements before before they would consider they would consider purchase. purchase. This required This required expensiverework expensive reworkafterafter the the equipment equipment had had been been removed removed from from its installed location. Since installed location. Since placing placing aa salvage salvage value value on on this this machinery and equipment would equipment wouldbe be speculative, speculative,and and thethe value value would would be be small small in in comparison to comparison to the overall overall decommissioning decommissioning expenses, expenses, thisthis analysis analysis does does not not attempt attempt to to quantify quantify the possible possible salvage salvage value value that that an owner may realize based upon those efforts. may It is is assumed, assumed, for for purposes purposes of this analysis, analysis, thatthat any anyvalue value received received from from the scrap generated in the the sale of scrap the dismantling dismantling process process would would be more more than offset offset byby the the on-site on-site processing processing costs. costs. The The dismantling dismantling techniques techniques assumed in the the decommissioning decommissioning estimatesestimates do do not include include the additional cost cost for size size reduction and preparation preparation to to meet meet "furnace "furnace ready" conditions. For example, ready" conditions. example, thethe recovery recovery of of copper copper from from electrical electrical cabling cabling maymay require the removalremoval andand disposition disposition of of any any contaminated contaminated insulation, insulation, an added added expense. expense. WithWith a volatile volatile market, market, the the potential potential profit margin in scrap scrap recovery recovery is highly highly speculative, speculative, regardless of of the the ability ability to free release to free release this material. material. ThisThis assumption assumption is an an implicit implicit recognition of recognition of scrap scrap value value inin the disposal of clean clean metallic metallic waste at no no additional additional cost cost to the the project. project. Furniture, tools, Furniture, tools, mobile mobile equipment equipment suchsuch as as forklifts, forklifts, trucks, trucks, bulldozers, bulldozers, and other and other property property will will bebe removed removedatat no no cost cost or credit to or credit to the the decommissioning decommissioning project. project. Disposition Disposition may may include include relocation to other other facilities. Spare partsparts will will also also be be made made available available forfor alternative alternativeuse. use. Energy Energy estimating purposes, For estimating purposes, the the plant plantisisassumed assumedtotobe bede-energized, de-energized, with with the exception the exception of of those those facilities facilities associated associated with with spent spent fuelfuel storage. storage. Replacement power power costs are used used for for the thecost costofofenergy energy consumption consumption during during decommissioning decommissioning for tooling,tooling, lighting, ventilation, and and essential essential services. services. Insurance Insurance Costs Costs for for continuing continuing coverage coverage (nuclear (nuclear liability liability andand property property insurance) insurance) following cessationof following cessation of plant plant operations operations and and during during decommissioning are decommissioning are included included and based upon and based upon current currentoperating operating premiums. Reductions premiums. Reductionsininpremiums, premiums,throughout throughoutthe thedecommissioning decommissioning process, process, were wereprovided providedby byExelon. Exelon. TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Section 3, Page Section 3, of 22 17 of Page 17 Taxes Property taxes Property taxes are are included included forfor all alldecommissioning decommissioning periods. periods. Exelon Exelon provided aa schedule provided schedule of of decreasing decreasingtax tax payments payments against against the current current tax assessment. These reductions continue until reaching aa minimum reductions continue minimum property tax payment property payment of $1 million of $1 million perper year; year; this level is maintained maintained for the for the balance of the decommissioning program. Site Modifications The perimeter The fence and perimeter fence and in-plant security barriers will will be be moved, moved, as appropriate, to appropriate, to conform conformto to the the Site Site Security Security Plan in force force during the various stages stages of of the project. project. 3.6 COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
A schedule of expenditures for each scenario A schedule of expenditures is provided for each scenario is providedin Tables in Tables3.1 3.1 through 3.3. through 3.3. Decommissioning Decommissioning costs costsareare reported reported inin the the year year of ofprojected projected expenditure; however, expenditure; however, thethe values values are provided provided in thousands thousands of of 2012 2012 dollars. dollars. Costs are not inflated, escalated, or discounted over the period of Costs are not inflated, escalated, or discounted over the period of expenditure. The The annual expenditures expenditures are are based based upon upon the the detailed detailed activity activity costs reported in Appendices Appendices C C through through E, along with the schedules discusseddiscussed in Section 4.4. TLG Services, Inc. TLG Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 3, 3, Page Page 18 of 22 22 TABLE TABLE 3.1 DECON DECON ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL SCHEDULE ANNUAL EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2012 dollars) (thousands, Equipment & Equipment & Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 1 2046 17,328 17,328 3,108 824 11 11 3,537 24,808 2047 1 72,522 15,915 15,915 4,021 2,111 2,1111 21,635 116,205 i,...........2048 2048!
-.-.... -.. -~-
! 82,398 30,222
.....- - . - -........ -.-.-...........- ...-.. -.-.-.+--.-....... 3,865 .
3,865.
--.-~.--.-._
27,911......_.
- 25,575 169,972 I 2049 i 80,423 31,147 31,1471 3,038 34,186 19,431 168,22!
168,224 2050 I 74,912 21,280 2,453 9,0051 9,005 10,072 117,721 2051 74,400 20,364 2,398 6,6671 6,667 9,204 113,033 I 2052 I 54,352 9,808 1,555 5,6881 7,050 78,453 I 2053 I 45,486 4,263 642 642.. 4951 49511 4,938 55,823 I 2054 2054 II 30,768 30,768 14,665 320 001I 4,497 50,24:~ 50,249 I 2055 30,768 14,665 320 001I 4,497 50,249 I 2056 I 7,151 1,446 32 0 [I 4,237 12,866 2057 4,553,1 0 0 0 4,196 8,7491 2058 2058 4,553 1 0 0 0 4,196.~._8J49 4,196 8,749 2059 4,553 0 0 0 4,196 8,749 2060 4,565 0I 0 0 4,208 8,773 2061 4,553 0 0 0 01 4,196 8,749
! 2062 4,553 0 0 0 4,196 8,749 I... _?Q~~
2063 5&~r-_.___~}234 5,631 3,234 0 00 _ _4,196 4-,-,_196 1~10~~ 13,062 I 2064 5,852 4,569 0 22 12,740 12,740 23,163 I 2065 2,117 565 5651 0 251 2,543' 2,543 5,476 iT~tal Total
,* *
- 6* *
- 1* *-1-** ,* *4. .-3. . .6.-..1- -..-..- . . -.1.....7-.-5....,. 51-. . l--*---**i 9*-,* *4* * *6..****7****+--****--*--8-6****-,**3*****2-**8****+--**_*1-5-***-9***,**3***_***4****2****+--**1**--,-0****5-*1-*-,-8***2******4
......_..._............_..._..._.____...3........ _..... __......... _..... .._..
611,436 _..__.._._._.._._..._..__.___._.._. __.__`.____.._..._...__...__.._.___I 175,251
.._...._._.__....__.._........_.._._.L_._........_.._..._.__...._._._...__...1 ._.._._.____.._.__.__ ................
19,4671 86,328 159,342 1 1,051,824 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev.00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 3, 3, Page Page 19 of 22 22 TABLE TABLE 3.2 3.2 DELAYED DECON DELAYED DECON ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL SCHEDULE ANNUALEXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2012 dollars) (thousands, Equipment & Equipment & Year Year Labor Labor Materials Materials Energy Energy Burial Burial Other Other Total Total
! 2046 2046 ! 13,638 13,638 316 316 824 824 11 11! 1,9971 1,997 16,785 16,785 1I 2047 I 62,743 6,925 3,198 766 23,413 97,045 7661 1'--~6!~-+-~t~i1-+- - . --!,:~~ 1,~}~L.--_-1ii 1~:~~~L---~i~~66 10,127 2048 23,061_ . 1,405 1,258 488 1 6-33. 8 2049 13,811 435 640 171 6,698 21,600 I 2050 I 13,811 13,811 435 640 17 1711. 6,698 21,600 I 2051 13,811 435 640 17 i 6,698 21,600 I 2052 13,848 436 641 17 171 6,717 21,659 I
li:'~" 222053 13,811 0 5 3 II 1133 ',881111 435 435 640, 640 17 17 6,698 6,698 21,600 21,600 2054 054 . 13,811 435 43511 640 171 17 6,698 _ _____g17690 21,6QQ r 2055 I 13,811 435 640 171 6,698 21,600 I 205f?2056 J 13,848 436 641 17 6,717 21,659l 21,659 I 2057 13,811 435 640 17\ 171 6,698 21,600'1 21,600 l_~_~8 I 13,811 2058 13,811 E 435 435 664400"~ 640 ! 171 ___§6,698 17..J . 6~§..f-~1&QQ. 21,600 I 2059 I 13,811 13,811 435 640 I 17\ 17 6,698 21,600 i 2060 13,8481 13,8481 436 641 171 17 6,717 6,717, 21,659 I 2061 I 13,811 13,811\ 435 640 17 17 6,698 21,600 21,600 I 2062 I 13,811 13,811 1 435 640 171 17 E 6,698 21,600 21,600,
\__~O~~ 15,967 2063 15,967 _6,!~94 r--___..§.4,Ql_____17 _~~
6,904 640 17 6,698 ___~Q1.~_~Q~ 30,225 2064 i, 2064 I' 11,456 11,456 5,870 5,870 462 4621 1 12 12 5,446 5,446 23,245 23,245 i 20652065 44,043 44,043 1,631 1,631 3,198 3,198 38 38 2,432 2,432 51,340 51,340
~--~-6-~*~-. ~~:~~:-- i-~~-6~-~+ . . --~:6-~*~l--*. -~~,~~: 1i:~~~ . -----i~i.~~!.
2066 65,594 _._._.....__-.._..__.._._., ._.___.....__..._.__...__. 14 ,715 ....__...._._.......__3,11. _._...__.10,838! 7,138 101,402 2067 ----i - 68,629 .. * ..--- .. 18,005 3,038 21,574; 11,818 123,064 l_.. ~.Q§~ 2068 63,676 63,676_ __ 9,798 9, 798 _ _2,482 2A~2 7,892 7,892 §., 75lj! ___89598 5,751 ~_~59~_1 I 2069 2069 ! 62,801 62,801 8,646 8,646 2,398 2,398 5,998 i 5,998 4,9041 4,904 84,747 84,747 2070 I 2070 54,091 54,091 5,152 5,152 1,516 1,516 3,008 3,008, 3,787 3,787 67,555 67,555 t--}6~-}----\---.~~~~-~~t-----. . -*i-!:~-~!1----. ---------~~i-I-------*-----. --6+--------i:~~~1------- . :~::~~ 2071 31,630 _ _ ...... ...... 11,618. 398 8 1 781 45 43 2072 27,254 14,864 1 321 0 1,496 43,936 2073 i 13,776 I:---------*--T--*---, 2073 13,776 7,513 7,5131i - - - - - -162 1621 00 I 7561 756 t - - - - - - - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - -
- r - - * -22,208 22,208
~_ ! I I -l-------i-------+------i ! Total Total I 751,821 751,8211 119,452 119,452 1 31,969 31,969 50,886=
50,886 181,373 181,373 1,135,501 1,135,501 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev.Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 3,3, Page 20 of Page 20 of 22 22 TABLE TABLE 3.3 SAFSTOR SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL SCHEDULE ANNUAL EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2012 dollars) Equipment & & Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2046 I 14,530! 14,5301 2,992 824 111 11 3,537 21,894 2047 I 66,210 17,326 3,198 7661 27,853 115,353 ir.- 2048 i 26,597 12,015 1,258
..........---.---l---- . -.-----. _-------.----.- .__._____._..L___.__________________ 488 4881 i 13,021 13,02111
. --*---------+-------------*-----T--*-----** 53,380 i 2049 I 17,364 17,3641 11,093 640 171 10,499 39,612 1 17,364 I 2050 I 17,364 11,093 640 17 10,499 39,612 i 2051 . 17,364 11,093 11,093, 640 17 10,499 39,612 2052 12'052 9,159 1 3,149 398 10 5,989 18,705 2053 6,428 6,_428 319 320 88\ 4,540_~_11,61~
4,540 11,615 __ 2054 6,428 319 320 81 4,540 11,61~_ 11,615 2055 6,428 319 320 8 4,540 11,615 11,615 i 2056 6,445 320 3201 321 881 4,553 4,5531 11,647
- 2057 ! 6,428 31~
319 320 81 4,540 11,615 11,615
! 2058 I 6,428 319 31911 320 81 4,540 11,615 11,615 I r--2059--6A2sr--3i91 2059 6,428 319 320 8 8T 4,540 4,540 11,6151 11,615 2060 12060 6,445 6,4451 320 320 321 321 881 4,553 11,647 11,647 2061 6,428 6,428 319 319 320 320 88 4,540 4,540 11,615 11,615 2062 I 6,428 2062 6,428 319 319 320 320 88 1 4,540 ,
4,540 11,615 11,615 Ie- 2063 Iy - -7,506 2063 7,506 3,554 3,554
- - - f--------------f-------
320 320 . 81 81 4,540 4,540 15,928 15,928 I 2064 I 7,732 12064 7,732 4,201 4,201 321 321 88 4,547 4,547 16,809 16,809 i 2065 2065 I 3,721 3,721 313 313 320 320 771 2,319 I 2,319 6,680 6,680 313 1
- ig~~---+------~~i~i-- ------ ----**--*--~-i~L--------{~-6-1--------------*~-*l--------~:~i~ .-----~:'~~g!
2066 320 7 2067 __--3,721 ... _.__.._. 3,721 313 320 7 2,319 2,319
.- - 6,680 6,680 1_20§_~_L~7~LL 2068 3,731 314 314 321 _____77_L_~1_32~
321 2,325 6,~~1 6,698 i 2069 2069 i 3,721 3,7211 313 313 320 320 7' 71 2,3191 2,319 6,680 6,680 r 2070 2070 I 3,721 3,721 313 313 320 320 71 7 2,319 2,319 6,680 6,680 2071 I 3,721 ........-.. ..... 313 1 I 2071 --...._:_......___3,721 313 320 320 7\ 2,3191 7.._..._--_...._._.2, 319 6,680 6,680 r-'20-72---'r'---3':7Si-1 2072 3,731 1 314 314 321---'--'---iI'-------2-:S25r-'-------'-'-6,-69S-321 7 2,325 6,698 i---~-Ql~----t-~~~l-1-------~J&J-- 2073 3,721 ! 313 1 320 320 7 L___~~!Q.L_-_-§J.68~, 2,319 6,680 2074
! 2074 : 3,72111 3,721 313 i 313 320 320 , I 771 1 2,3191; 2,319 6,680J 6,680 TLG TLG Services,Services, Inc.
Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006,Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 3, 3,Page Page 21 21 of of 22 22 TABLE TABLE 3.3 (continued) SAFSTOR SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURESEXPENDITURES (thousands, 2012 dollars) (thousands, 2012 dollars) Equipment Equipment & & Year Year Labor Labor Materials Materials Energy Energy Burial Burial Other Other Total Total 2075 1 2075 3,721 3,721 313 313 320 320 771 2,319 2,319 6,6801 6,680 2076 I 3,731 314 321 717 2,325 6,698 j 2077 2077 3,721 3, 721 313 1 320 __ ._.____._. __ .. _}71L.. ..__.~, 2,319 . ._. ____
~L~L ._. ____....._..._6,680_
._.§1§§gj 2078 2078 3,721 313 320 717 2,319 6,680 L~}~--l--?-1-Z~
2079 3,721 _. 313 313 320 320 7 L~,31Q 2,319 ..1 _ _6,680 I 2080 i 3,731 314 321 7 71 2,325 2,325 6,698 ! 2081 i# 3,721 313 320 7!71 2,319 6,680 2082 I 3,721 2082 313 320 7 71 2,319 6,6~QJ 6,680 2083 ! 3,721 313 320 71
- 71. 2,319 6,680 l 2084 I 3,731 2084 314 321 7 2,32~ ______j?1.6~~
2,325 6,698 2085 I 3,721 ! 2085 313 3320 7711 2,319 6,680 i 2086 ! 3,721 313 320 7 2,319 6,680 6,680, 208 ! 2087 ,---_ 7 _----j!_ _3,721 _ _ _ e---_ 313 320 71 7 2,319 6,680
- 2088 I 3,731 314 321 7 71 2,325 6,6981 l__20~~_1---QJ21 2089 3,721 J-_____ ~_Q _____~~~~--_--_--------
313 320 ______l_L--~l~l~ 7 2,319 ___- .i?&§Q_
---------- -- 6,680 ._
I 2090 ! 37211 3,7211 313 320 71 7\ 2,319 . 6,680 2091 I 3,72113,7211 313 320 7 1i 2,319 6,680 L-
- 2092_ 3,731 2091_-1_ 3,7?1 314 _ _ _9_?J 314 321 717 _L_~L?1§_r-2,325 _____§,698., 6,698 ,
! 2093 2093 I 3,721 3,721 313 313 320 320 7171 2,319 2,319 6,680 6,680 U~~:l ~:~~~I.___~lll ~~~I ~I _t~~L __1: 2094 3,721 313 320 7! 2,319 ' 6,680 2095 3,721 313 320 7 2,319 6,680 i 2096 2096 I 3,731 3,731 314 31411 321 321 77\ 2,325 2,325 6,698 6,698 2097 3,721 2097 .U12!___ 313 313 320 320 77 2,31~ 2,319 6,~~~ 6,680 2098 2098 I 3,721 3,721 313 313 320 320 77 2,319 2,319 6,680 6,680 2099 2099 I 3,7213,721 313 313 320 320 77 2,319 2,319 6,680 6,680 2100 2100 16,519 16,519 723 7231 1,234 1,234 17 17 2,355 i 2,355 20,849 1 20,849 I 2101 2101 49,887 49,887 4,719 4,71911 3,198 3,198 39' 39! 2,432 2,432 60,275 60,275
~-{l~~-'-~~%~ ------~~*}t-- ~:~~~ -lt~!t_~~:~~-~it~~~t 2102 69,056 18,204 3,067 17,612 10,357 118,297 2103 67,580 15,503 2,794 15,624! 9,398 110,8991 TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc.
Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Section Section 3, 3, PagePage 22 of 22 22 TABLE TABLE 3.3 (continued) SAFSTOR SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL SCHEDULE ANNUAL EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2012 dollars) (thousands, Equipment & Equipment & Year Year Labor Labor Materials Materials Energy Energy Burial Burial Other Other Total Total 2104 2104 62,972 62,972 8,651 8,651 2,405 2,405 5,9851 5,9851 4,9-54~--~96~1 4,954 84,966 2105 I 2105 62,753 8,608 2,393 5,9521i 5,952 4,934 84,640 2106 I1--*****--******-***-** !r*-----**-*--- J 40,805 1-**--**--****-**.-..
. 5,083 557 251 25 i 2,371,
- ......-..-......- - - - - - -....- -......-.-...- -....- -..-.-.-.--........;-.-...- . -......-._....2,.37.1 48,842 i 2107 I1 27,471 14,904 320 0I 1,492 44,187 2108 2108 27,546 14,945 321 00___ L __.1....t!~§_ 1,496 44,308_
44,308 2109 2109 151 151 82 2 01 88 2421 242 I I Total Total I1803,188 803,188 182,094 38,925 46,938 46,9381 257,427 1,328,572J 1,328,572 TLG TLG Services, Services,Inc.Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev.00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Section Section 4,4, Page Page 11 of of 77
- 4. SCHEDULE
- 4. SCHEDULE ESTIMATE The schedules for The for the decommissioning scenarios considered in this this study studyfollow follow thethe sequence presented sequence presented in AIF/NESP-036 study, in the AIF/NESP-036 study, withwith minor minor changes changes to to reflect reflect recent experience recent experience and and site-specific site-specificconstraints.
constraints. In addition, the the scheduling scheduling has has been been revised to reflect revised to reflect the the spent fuel management plans described in management plans described in Section 3.4.1. Section 3.4.1. A schedule A schedule or or sequence sequence of of activities activities is is presented presented in Figure Figure 4.1 4.1 for for thetheDECON DECON decommissioningalternative. decommissioning alternative.The Theschedule scheduleisis also also representative representative of of the the work work activities identified activities identified in in the the delayed delayed dismantling dismantling scenarios, absent any spent scenarios, absent spent fuel fuel constraints. The The scheduling scheduling sequence sequence assumes assumes that fuel fuel is removed removed from from the spentspent fuel pool fuel pool within within the first first five five and and one-half one-half years years after afteroperations operations cease.cease. TheThe key key activities listed activities listed in thethe schedule schedule do do notnotreflect reflecta aone-to-one one-to-one correspondence correspondence with with those activities in the cost cost tables, butbut reflect reflect dividing dividing some activities for for clarity and combining others combining others for for convenience. convenience. The The schedule schedule was was prepared using using the the"Microsoft "Microsoft Project 2010" Project 2010" computer computersoftware.[311 softwareJ31] 4.1 SCHEDULE ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS The schedule reflects reflects the results results of ofaaprecedence precedence network networkdeveloped developed for for the the site decommissioning decommissioning activities,activities,i.e.,i.e., aa PERT PERT (Program (Program Evaluation Evaluation and and Review Technique) Software Review Technique) SoftwarePackage. Package.The The work work activity activity durations durations used used in in the precedence network reflect precedence network reflect the actual actual man-hour man-hour estimates estimatesfrom from the thecost cost tables, tables, adjusted adjusted by stretching certain activities activities overover their their slack slack range and and shifting the start start andand end enddates datesof ofothers. others. The Thefollowing following assumptions assumptions were were made in in the the development development of of the the DECON DECON decommissioning decommissioning schedule:schedule:
.. The fuel fuel building building is is isolated isolated until until such time that all such time all spent spent fuelfuel has has been been discharged discharged from fromthe the spent spent fuelfuel pool pool to to the the DOEDOE or or to to thethe ISFSI.
ISFSI. Decontamination Decontamination and and dismantling of of the the storage storage poolpool are are initiated initiatedonceonce the the transfer transferof ofspent spentfuel fuel totothe theISFSI ISFSIisiscomplete. complete.
.. AllAll work work (except vessel and internals (except vessel internals removal) removal) is is performed performed during duringan an8 hour hour workday, workday, 55 days days per per week, week, with with no no overtime.
overtime. There There are are eleven eleven paidpaid holidays per year. holidays per year.
** Reactor Reactor and internals internals removal removal activities activities are are performed performed by by using using separate separate crews crews forfor different different activities activities working working on different shifts, on different shifts, withwith aa corresponding backshift charge for the corresponding backshift charge for the second shift. second shift.
<II Multiple Multiple crews crews workwork parallel parallel activities activities to to the themaximum maximumextent extentpossible, possible, consistent consistent with withoptimum optimumefficiency, efficiency, adequate adequate access access for for cutting, cutting,removal removal and and laydown laydown space,space, and with with thethe stringent stringentsafetysafetymeasures measuresnecessarynecessary during duringdemolition demolition of of heavy heavy components components and and structures.
structures. TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev.Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 4,4, Page Page 22 of of 77 For plant systems ~ Forremoval, plant systems theremoval, systems the with systemsthe with the longest longest removal removal durations durations in in areas on the critical areas on critical path are are considered considered to to determine determine the the duration of duration of the the activity. activity. 4.2 4.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE PROJECT The period-dependent The period-dependentcosts costspresented presentedin in the the detailed detailed cost cost tables tables are basedbased upon the durations upon durations developed developed in in the theschedule schedulefor fordecommissioning decommissioning Clinton. Clinton. Durations are established Durations established between between several several milestones milestones in in each each project project period; period; these durations these durations are are used used to to establish establish aa critical critical path path for for the the entire entire project. project. In turn, the turn, the critical critical path path duration duration forfor each period isis used each period used as as the basisbasis for for determining the period-dependent period-dependent costs. A A second second critical critical path path isis also also shown shown for the for the spent spent fuel fuel cooling cooling period, which determines period, which determines the the release release of the fuel fuel building forfor final final decontamination. In Figure 4.1,4.1, the schedule schedule isis based based upon upon years years following following the finalfinal shutdown shutdown date of September date September 29, 29, 2046. 2046. Project timelines are Project timelines are provided provided in FiguresFigures 4.2 4.2 through 4.4;4.4; the milestone dates are based based on on this this same same shutdown shutdown date. date. The The start of start of decommissioning decommissioning activities in in the the Delayed Delayed Decommissioning Decommissioning scenario scenario is concurrent with the the end end of of the the fuel fuel transfer transferactivity activity(i.e. (i.e. to toan anoff-site off-site DOEDOE facility). TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Section Section 4, 4, Page 3 of Page 3 of 7 7 FIGURE FIGURE 4.1 ACTIVITY ACTIVITY SCHEDULE SCHEDULE ID ITask ID Task Name Name l Y y~°Iysl lY-ilYl1 Y3 Y4J Y Y5 Y51 Y6 Y61 Y7 Yil Y8 ysl Y91YlolY'Y9 10 111 11Y1212 11 Clinton schedule IClinton schedule il Ilfit,MkB,H/:fIJJjTKKtIT1'K:15If;;:;/T\I;;:Q;iM'tlSm:tirttlimElitlit1BIi 22 I Shutdcrvvn Vmt `nit 1 1 3l 3 oJ,4 55 66 77 Period Period i la la Unit
.x ..r_ of Certificate 11 - Shutdown Shutdown through ct pl?rmanent through transition permanent cessation.
Fuel storage pool operations Dry fuel storage operations cessation transition submitted f;; r 88 99 Prepare activity specifications Perform site characterization r 10 10 P',I)A1' !-submitted PSDAR ut,i-ixitted 11 11 Written certIflCate of permanentpermanent removal removalofof#:,fuel submItted
,a}>ii,^t ce.l
~
~
12 12 `^ Site _ _^ifx^.^ecoxnnussioning cost estimate estimate sUltlmlltted 13 13 DOC DOC staff , n u.;obilized
;:11 llJ.VUU1L"' ...
14 14 Period Period Ib Unit 11 -- Decommissioning lb Unit Decommissioning preparations preparations 15 15 Fuel Fuel storage storagepool poolopera n.ons operations 16 16 17 17 Dry Dry fuel fuel storage operation operations 18 18 Prepare detailed detailedwork work procedures procedures
~I t
19 19 Decon DeconNSSS NSSS 20 20 Isolate Isolate spent spentfuel fuel pool pool
~
21 21 Period Period 2a Unit Unit 11 -- Large component component removal removal 22 22 Fuel Fuel storage storage poolpool operations operations
~
23 23 Dry Dry fuel fuel sstorage torage operations operations 24 24 J^f l.IC ,l r-rp"Hr,,, k,lli=_i
.nn fo1' reactor v",sse! removal 25 25 Reactor ves~el & internals "
26 26 NSSS components U.lo'P05UiOIl UL 2" 27 n e,. _ntial svsystems Non-essential stems ~ TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Analysis Cost Analysis Section Section 4, 4, Page Page 4 4 of of 77 FIGURE FIGURE 4.1 4.1 (continued) (continued) ACTIVITY ACTIVITY SCHEDULESCHEDULE ID Task ID Task Name Name
-1 Y11 IY~)2 Y3 IY-l Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y IY77 Y8 Y3 Y9 Y YIO 1Q~11 11~12 12 28 28 Main turbineJgenerator Main turbinelgenerator `....::.,.
29 29 30 30 Main condenser Main condenser License termination pl,.fi submitted iiiiiat.r.tecl (" i",,':,;,
~
31 31 Period 2b Unit 11 -- Decontamination Decontamination (wet fuel) 3222 Fuel Fuel storage Cl t l"1
^ I d 33 33 Il-, fuel storage ~k'~L~w.vL1S 34 34 Remove 11:
systems not 1c .c t]^Jporting
^i ,a': L^ "vet fuell """v~gP
`.'^ ^1 i us^awwv,^na*^wnn 30 35 Decon 'ilrli'1g:" not C:!!uppvHulg \vet fuel storage s^wbwa^:.
~
36 36 License terminahon approved. .1'1 i1~" 37 37 Fuel stor.t, storage i-,^l sati azl;,ljl, for available for <3,-ccznznissiorun-
..], ;"', ..,.
38 38 Period 2d Period 2d Unit Unit 11 -- Decontamination Decontamination following wet fuel fuel storage storage 39 39 40 40 41 41 42 42 Dry fuel storage operations Remove Remove remainizT Ilecor, Decon Y.. Period. Period 2e remainingsystems wet-tfuel 2e Unit "a systelll.5 storage ai areaa Unit 11 -- Plant license license termination termination
~
Iii. 43 43 Dry Dry fuelfuel storage storage operations operations I~ 44 44 B. .._t Final Site S ..u. ""Y ~ 45 45 review & A l41l0> 46 46 Pi Part 50 f=it,._u license inated terminated 47 47 48 Period Peliod 3b 3b Unit Unit 11 -- Site Site restoration restoration 48 Dry fuel storage operations Dry fuel storage operations
; ";:;'; ,:J;;;;
9 tIding ,-l"'mAlitinn<< backfill and l"nf~"t>Smin" 49 4jj y' 50 END
'or -c r
TLG Services, Inc. TLG Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 4, 4, PagePage 55 of 77 FIGURE FIGURE 4.2 DECOMMISSIONING DECOMMISSIONING TIME TIMELINE LINE DECON DECON (not to scale) (not (Shutdown September September 29, 29,2046) 2046)
-< ........................... ..................................................................................................................................................... ~
_.................................................................................. ~..................................................................................................................................................... 31-Pool and Pool and ISFSI ISFSI Operations ISFSI Operations Period 11 Period . Period 3 Transition and Period 2 . Pen?d.2 Site ISF~I ISFSI ISFSI Decommissioning R Site
~~~~----~~~-Fi~-1~~1 Preparations I Operations D&D 09/2046 09/2046 03/2048 03/2048 1112053 02/2056 12/2064 06/2065 Storage Pool Pool EmptyEmpty 03/2052 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Section 4, Page Section 4, Page 6 of 7 FIGURE 4.3 DECOMMISSIONING TIME LINE TIMELINE DELAYED DELAYED DECON (not to scale) (Shutdown September September 29, 29,2046) 2046)
~ ..............................................-....................................... .............................................. _..................................................y Storage Pool Operations (pool empty: 06/2064)
(pool Period 11 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 Period Period 55 _ _" __+~~~i~~~j_______ "__j~:~:.~::j Transition and Dormancy Delayed Decommissioning Site Site Preparations
~-"~"
Preparations Restoration 09/2046 03/2048 12/2064 07/2066 03/2071 07/2073
~ .................................................................... -
*.ISFSI ISFSI Operations (ISFSI empty: empty: 12/2064) 12/2064)
All Spent Fuel Fuel Off site TLG TLG Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev.Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Section Section 4,4, Page Page 7 of 77 FIGURE FIGURE 4.4 DECOMMISSIONING TIME DECOMMISSIONING TIMELINE LINE SAFSTOR SAFSTOR (not to scale) (not (Shutdown September 29, 29,2046) 2046)
~
Spent Fuel Storage Period 11 Period Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 Period Period 55 Transition and Dormancy Delayed Decommissioning Site Site Preparations
~" "-+::~~~t~~+ "_"_+~~~~~1 Preparations Restoration ............................................... ................ ..................................... F.....................................................................................
I 09/2046 09/2046 03/2048 03/2048 09/2100 03/2102 09/2106 01/2109 Storage Pool Pool Empty Empty 03/2052 03/2052 ISFSI Empty Empty 12/2064 12/2064 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc. Inc.
ClintonPower Clinton PowerStation Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning CostAnalysis Analysis Section Section 5,5, Page Page 11 of of 55 5.
- 5. RADIOACTIVE RADIOACTIVE WASTES The objectives The objectives of of the the decommissioning decommissioning process processare are the the removal removal of of all all radioactive radioactive material from material fromthe the site site that that would restrict its future use and the would restrict the termination termination of of the NRClicense(s).
NRC license(s). ThisThis currently currently requires the remediation of all radioactive radioactive material at the site at site in inexcess excessof ofapplicable applicablelegallegallimits. limits.Under Underthe theAtomic AtomicEnergy Energy Act,[321 Act,[32] the NRC is NRC is responsible responsible for for protecting protecting the public from sources of ionizing radiation. Title Title 10 of 10 of the the Code Code ofof Federal Federal Regulations delineates the production, Regulations delineates production, utilization, utilization, and and disposal of radioactive disposal radioactive materials materials and processes. In particular, and processes. particular, §71 §71 defines defines material as radioactive material as itit pertains pertains totopackaging packaging and and transportation transportation and and §61§61 specifies its specifies its disposition. Most Most of of the the materials transportedfor materials being transported for controlled controlled burial burialare arecategorized categorizedas asLow Low Specific SpecificActivity Activity(LSA)(LSA)ororSurface SurfaceContaminated Contaminated Object Object (SCO) (SCO)materials materials containing Type Type A A quantities, quantities, as defined in 49 49 CFR §173-178.
§173-178. Shipping Shipping containers containers are requiredrequired to Industrial Packages to be Industrial Packages (IP-1, (IP-1, IP-2 IP-2 or IP-3, IP-3, asas defined defined in in subpart subpart173.411).
173.411). For For study, commercially available steel containers are this study, commercially available steel containers are presumed to be used for the for disposal of piping, piping, small components, and and concrete. concrete. Larger Larger components components can can serve serve asas their own their own containers, containers, with with proper proper closure closure of of all all openings, openings, access access ways,ways, and and penetrations. The volumes volumes of radioactive radioactive waste generated generated during duringthe thevarious variousdecommissioning decommissioning activities activities at the the site site isis shown shown on on aa line-item line-item basis basis in inAppendices Appendices C, C, D,D, and and EE andand summarized summarized in Tables Tables 5.1 5.1 through through 5.3. 5.3. The The quantified quantified wastewastevolumevolume summaries summaries shown shown in these these tables tables are areconsistent consistentwith with§61 §61classifications. classifications. The The volumes volumes are are calculated based calculated based on on the exterior dimensions for containerized exterior dimensions for containerized material and on the on the displaced volume of components components servingserving as as their own waste containers. containers. The reactor reactor vessel and internals internals are are categorized categorized as as large large quantity quantity shipments shipments and, and, accordingly, accordingly, will will bebe shipped shipped in in reusable, shielded truck casks casks with with disposable disposable liners. liners. In In calculating calculating disposal disposal costs, the burial burial fees fees are are applied applied against againstthe theliner linervolume, volume, as as well well as the the special special handling handling requirements requirementsof ofthe thepayload. payload.Packaging Packagingefficiencies efficienciesare are lower lower for for the highly highly activated activated materials materials (greater (greater than thanType Type AAquantity quantitywaste),waste), where where highhigh concentrations concentrations of of gamma-emitting gamma-emitting radionuclides radionuclides limit limit the thecapacity capacityofof the the shipping shipping canisters. canisters. No No process process system system containing/handling containinglhandling radioactiveradioactive substances substances at at shutdown shutdown isis presumed presumed to to meet meet material materialrelease releasecriteria criteriaby bydecay decayalone, alone, i.e., i.e., systems systemsradioactive radioactive at at shutdown shutdown will will still still bebe radioactive radioactive over over thethe time time period period during during which which the the decommissioning decommissioning is accomplished, accomplished, due due toto the thepresence presenceofoflong-lived long-livedradionuclides. radionuclides. While While thethe dose dose rates ratesdecrease decreasewith withtime, time,long-lived long-livedradionuclides radionuclides will willstill stillcontrol control the disposition requirements. the disposition requirements. TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev.Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Section Section 5,5, Page Page 2 of 55 The waste The waste material generated in the the decontamination decontamination and and dismantling dismantlingof of Clinton Clinton is is primarily generated primarily generated during Period 2 of the the DECON DECON alternative alternative and Period 4 of the the deferred alternatives. Material deferred Material that is is considered considered potentially potentially contaminated contaminated when when removed from removed from the the radiologically radiologically controlled controlledarea area isis sent to to processing processing facilities facilities in Tennessee for Tennessee for conditioning conditioning and disposal. disposal. Heavily Heavily contaminated contaminated components components and and activated materials activated materials are routed routed forfor controlled controlled disposal. disposal. The The disposal disposal volumes volumes reported in the tables tables reflect reflect the the savings savings resulting resultingfrom fromreprocessing reprocessingandandrecycling. recycling. Disposal fees Disposal fees are are calculated calculated using current current disposal disposal agreements, agreements, with with surcharges surcharges added for added for the the highly highly activated activated components, components, for for example, generated in example, generated in the the segmentationof segmentation ofthe the reactor reactor vessel. vessel. The The cost cost to to dispose dispose ofof the majority majority of of the the material generated material generated fromfrom the decontamination decontamination and dismantling dismantling activities activities is based based upon Exelon's upon Exelon's current disposal disposal agreement agreement withwith EnergySolutions for for its facility facility in Clive, Utah. Clive, Utah. facility is EnergySolutions' facility is not able to accept accept the the higher activity waste (Class B and Band C) generated C) generated in the decontamination decontamination of the reactorreactor vessel vessel and and segmentation segmentation of of the the components closest to the components closest to the core. As core. As a proxy for future disposal facilities, proxy for future disposal facilities, waste waste disposal costs disposal costs for for the the higher activity waste (Class B and C) C) are based upon the last last published published rate schedule schedule for for non-compact waste for non-compact waste for the Barnwell Barnwell facility, facility, adjusted adjusted for escalation of the the Atlantic Compact rates. TLG TLG Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Analysis Cost Analysis Section Section 5,5, Page Page 3 of 5 TABLE 5.1 TABLE 5.1 DECOMMISSIONING DECOMMISSIONING WASTE WASTE
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
DECON
! Waste Volume Mass Waste
- Cost Basis Cost I Class Class [1]
[I] I (cubic (cubic feet) feet (pounds) [______(pounds) II I, II I Low-Level Radioactive Energy Solutions EnergySolutions Waste (near-surface (near- surface Containerized A A I 219,548 13,142,220 disposal) EnergySolutions Bulk A 59,509 3,452,391 I I Future Disposal I I Facility Future Disposal B I I 2,180 I 253,736 Facility C I 1,320 110,235 Greater than Class C Spent Fuel (geologic repository) Equivalent GTCC .t 1,7851 351,100 I I Total [2] 284,343 17,309,682 I I Processed/Conditioned Recycling I (off-site recycling center) Vendors I A 487,391 I 20,285,930 II I I Scrap Metal Scra 151,932,000 151,932,000 [1] [1] Waste is classified classified according according toto the the requirements as delineated delineated inin Title Title 10 CFR, Part Part 61.55 61.55 [2] [2] Columns may not add add due due to to rounding. rounding. TLG TLG Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Decommissioning Analysis Section 5, Page Section 5, of 5 Page 4 of TABLE 5.2 DECOMMISSIONING DECOMMISSIONING WASTE WASTE
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
DELAYED DECON DELAYED Waste Volume 1 Mass Waste Cost Basis Cost Class[1]
'Class [I] (cubic feet) (pounds) ounds)
I Low-Level Radioactive EnergySolutions Waste (near-surface Containerized A A 126,122 7,772,117 disposal) EnergySolutions Bulk A A 54,048 2,934,429 Future Disposal I B Facility B I 751 97,700 Future Disposal Facility Facility__ I C II 1,0751 I 102,750 C_ I II I 1 I Greater than Class C (geologic repository) Spent Fuel Equivalent GTCC I 1,7851 351,100 I I Total[21 Total [2] I 183,781 11,258,096 I I ProcessedlConditioned Processed/Conditioned Recycling (off-site recycling center) center Vendors A 582,901 582,9011 I 24,179,990 I L Scrap Metal I Scrap Metal I 1 151,932,000 151,932,000 ['] [1] Waste is classified classified according to the according to the requirements as delineated delineated inin Title Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55 CFR, Part 61.55 [2] [2] Columns may not add due due to to rounding. rounding. TLG TLG Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton PowerStation Station Document Document E16-1640-006, E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Analysis Cost Analysis Section 5, Page Section 5, Page 5 of 5 TABLE 5.3 DECOMMISSIONING DECOMMISSIONING WASTE WASTE
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
SAFSTOR 1 Waste Volume Mass lYHlSS Waste ! Cost Basis I Class Class [1] [1] I fee (cubic feet) nds) pounds I Low-Level Radioactive Low-Level Radioactive I EnergySolutions I Waste (near-surface I Containerized A 125,048 7,617,500 7,617&QQ~ disposal) I EnergySolutions I Bulk A 55,969 1 ! 2,972,850 i Future Disposal Future Disposal I I Facilit Facility B 751 7511 97,700 r Future Disposal I I Facility C 1,038 100,425 I Greater than Spent than Class C Fuel Class C Spent Fuel i (geologic repository) (geologic repository) Equivalent GTCC 1,785 1,7851 351,100 Total [2] [2] 184,591 184591 11,139,575 11,139,5751 ProcessedlConditioned Processed/Conditioned Recycling off-siterecycling (off-site rec clip center center) Vendors A I 584,403 584,4031 24,323,490 i Scrap Metal l ! 151,932,000 151,9320001 [1] [1] classified according Waste is classified according to to the the requirements as delineated delineated inin Title Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55 CFR, Part 61.55 [2] [2] Columns may not add due due to to rounding. rounding. TLG TLG Services, Inc.Inc.
Clinton Power Station Clinton Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Document E16-1640-006, Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, 6, Page 1 ofof 6
- 6. RESULTS The analysis The analysis to estimate estimate thethe costs costs to todecommission decommission Clinton Clinton relied relied upon upon the the site-site-specific, technical specific, technical information information developed developedfor foraa previous previous analysis analysis prepared in in 2007.
2007. While not While not anan engineering engineering study, study, thethe estimates estimates provide provide Exelon Exelon with with sufficient sufficient information to information to assess assess their their financial obligations, as financial obligations, as they they pertain pertain to the the eventual eventual decommissioning of decommissioning ofthe the nuclear nuclear station. The estimates The estimates described described in in this report report are are based basedon onnumerous numerousfundamental fundamental assumptions, assumptions, including regulatory regulatory requirements, project contingencies, low-level requirements, project contingencies, low-level waste disposal radioactive waste disposal practices, practices, high-level high-level radioactive radioactive waste waste management management options, and site restoration requirements. options, requirements. The Thedecommissioning decommissioning scenarios scenarios assume assume continued operation of of the plant's plant's spent spentfuelfuelpool poolforfor aa minimum minimumof offive five and andone-half one-half years following following the cessation of of operations for for continued continued cooling cooling of the assemblies. assemblies. For the DECON DECON and and SAFSTOR SAFSTOR scenarios, the the ISFSI ISFSI isisexpanded expandedtotoaccommodate accommodate the spent spent fuel, fuel, once once sufficiently sufficiently cooled, until such time that cooled, until that the theDOEDOEcan cancomplete complete the transfer the transfer of of the the assemblies assemblies to its its repository. repository. The The spent fuel fuel remains remains in the the storage pools in the Delayed-DECON Delayed-DECON alternative. The cost projected to promptly promptly decommission decommission (DECON)(DECON) Clinton Clinton is is estimated to be be $1,051.8 million. $1,051.8 million. The The majority of this cost cost (approximately (approximately 69.7%) 69.7%) is is associated with the physical the physical decontamination decontamination and and dismantling dismantlingofofthe the nuclear nuclear unit unit soso that the the license can be license be terminated. terminated. Another Another 20.7% 20.7% is is associated associated with the the management, management, interim storage, storage, and and eventual eventual transfer transferof ofthe thespent spentfuel.fuel.The Theremaining remaining9.6% 9.6% isisforfor the demolition of of the the designated designated structures structures and and limited limited restoration restoration of of the the site. site. The primary cost contributors, identified in Tables 6.1 through 6.3, are either either labor-labor-related or associated related or associated with the management and disposition of the radioactive the management and disposition of the radioactive waste. waste. Program management is Program management is the largest largest single single contributor contributor to the the overall overall cost. cost. TheThe magnitude of the expenseexpense is aa function function of of both thethe size size of of the the organization organization requiredrequired to manage manage the the decommissioning, decommissioning, asaswell wellasas thethe duration duration of of the the program. program. It is is
- assumed, assumed, for for purposes purposes of of this this analysis, analysis, that that Exelon Exelon will will oversee oversee the the decommissioning program, using using aa DOC DOC to to manage managethe thedecommissioning decommissioninglabor laborforce force and the the associated associated subcontractors.
subcontractors. The The size size and andcomposition composition of of the themanagement management organization varies with the the decommissioning decommissioning phase and associated associated site site activities. activities.
- However, However, onceoncethethe operating operating license licenseisisterminated, terminated, the the staff is substantially substantially reducedreduced for for the conventional demolition and restorationrestoration of of the site, site, and and the thelong-term long-termcare careof of the the spent spent fuel fuel (for (for the DECON DECON alternative).
As As described described in in this this report, report, thethe spent spent fuelfuel pool pool willwill remain remain operational operational for for aa minimum of of five and and one-half one-half years years following following the the cessation cessationof ofoperations. operations.The Thepoolpool will will be be isolated isolated and an an independent independent spent spent fuel fuel island island created. created. ThisThis will will allow allow TLG Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Document E16-1640-006, Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, 6, Page 2 ofof 6 decommissioningoperations decommissioning operationstotoproceed proceedininand andaround around thethe pool pool area. area. Over Over the the five five and one-half year period, one-half year period, the spentspent fuel fuel will will be be packaged packaged into into transportable transportable steel steel canisters for loading into into aa DOE-provided DOE-provided transport transportcask cask(DECON (DECONand andSAFSTOR SAFSTOR alternatives). The The canisters will be be stored in concrete overpacks at concrete overpacks at the the ISFSI until the DOE is able to receive them. for waste disposal includes only The cost for only those those costs costs associated associated with with thethecontrolled controlled disposition of disposition of the the low-level radioactive waste low-level radioactive waste generated from from decontamination and dismantling activities, dismantling activities, including including plant plant equipment equipment and and components, components, structural structural material, filters, resins resins and anddry-active dry-active waste. waste. As Asdescribed describedininSection Section5,5,disposal disposalof of the majority of the the radioactive radioactive material is at EnergySolutions facility in Clive, Clive, Utah or some or some alternative alternative facility. facility. Highly Highly activated activated components, components, requiring requiring additional additional isolation from thethe environment, environment,are arepackaged packagedfor forgeologic geologic disposal. disposal. Disposal Disposalof ofthese these components is based upon a cost equivalent equivalent forfor spent spent fuel. fuel. A significant A significant portion of the metallic metallic waste waste is is designated designated for for additional additionalprocessing processing and treatment treatment at atan anoff-site off-sitefacility. facility. Processing Processing reduces reduces the the volume volume of of material material requiring controlled disposal through controlled disposal through such techniques techniques and processes processes as as survey and decontamination,and sorting, decontamination, and volume volume reduction. reduction.The The material material thatthat cannot cannot be be unconditionally unconditionally released is packaged for controlled disposal controlled disposal at one of the currently currently operating facilities. facilities. The cost identified in the summary cost identified summary table table for for processing processing is all- all-inclusive, incorporating the ultimate ultimate disposition disposition of of the the material. material. Removal costs Removal costs reflect reflect the the labor-intensive naturenatureof ofthe thedecommissioning decommissioning process, process, as as well well as the management management controlscontrols required to to ensure ensure aa safe safe and andsuccessful successful program. program. Decontamination and Decontamination and packaging packaging costscosts also also have have a large large labor labor component component that that isis based based upon upon prevailing prevailing union union wages. wages. Non-radiological Non-radiological demolitiondemolitionisis aa naturalnatural extension of the decommissioning process. The methods employed employed in in decontamination decontamination and and dismantling are generally destructive and indiscriminate are generally destructive and indiscriminate in in inflicting collateral damage. With With aa work work forceforce mobilized mobilized to to support support decommissioning operations, non-radiological decommissioning operations, non-radiologicaldemolition demolitioncan canbe be anan integrated integrated activity and aa logical activity and logical expansion expansion of the work work beingbeing performed performed in the the process process of of terminating terminating thethe operating operating license. license. Prompt Promptdemolition demolition reduces reduces future liabilities liabilities andand can be more more cost cost effective than deferral, effective than deferral, due to the the deterioration deterioration of of the the facilities facilities (and therefore the the working working conditions) conditions) with with time. time. The reported cost for for transport includes includes the tariffs and and surcharges surcharges associated associated with with moving large components components and/or overweight shielded casks overland, as as well well asas the the general general expense, expense, e.g.,e.g., labor labor and and fuel, of transporting fuel, of transporting material to the the destinations destinations identified in this report. For Forpurposes purposesof ofthis this analysis, analysis, material materialisisprimarily primarilymoved moved overland by truck. truck. TLG Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Document E16-1640-006, Cost Analysis Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, 6, Page of 6 Page 33 of Decontamination is Decontamination is used used toto reduce reduce thethe plant's radiation radiation fields fields and and minimize minimize worker exposure. Slightly exposure. Slightly contaminated contaminated material or material located within aa contaminated contaminated area is sent sent to to an an off-site off-site processing center, i.e., processing center, i.e., this this analysis does not assume that does not that contaminated plant contaminated plant components components and and equipment equipment can can be be decontaminated decontaminated for for uncontrolled release uncontrolled release in-situ. in-situ. Centralized Centralized processing processingcenters centers have have proven proven to to be be aa more economical more economicalmeansmeans of ofhandling handling the the large volumes volumes of material producedproduced in in the the dismantling of aa nuclear unit. License termination License termination survey survey costscosts are are associated associated with with thethe labor labor intensive intensive and and complex activity complex activity of ofverifying verifyingthat that contamination has been been removed removed from from the the site site toto the levels specified levels specified by the regulating agency. This process involves regulating agency. This process involves a systematic a systematic survey of survey of all all remaining remaining plant surfacesurface areas areas andandsurrounding surroundingenvirons, environs, sampling, sampling, isotopic analysis, isotopic analysis,andand documentation documentationofofthe the findings. findings.The Thestatus status of of any any plant plant components and components and materials not not removed removed in inthe thedecommissioning decommissioning process process will will also also require confirmation and and will will add add to to the theexpense expense of of surveying surveying thethefacilities facilities alone. alone. The remaining The remaining costs costs include include allocations allocations for for heavy heavy equipment equipment and and temporary temporary services, as services, as well well as as for for other other expenses expenses suchsuch asas regulatory feesfees and the premiums for for nuclear nuclea!" insurance. insurance. While While site operating operating costs costs areare greatly greatly reduced reduced following following the the final cessation final cessation ofof plant operations, operations, certain administrative functions functions do do need to to bebe maintained maintained either either at ataabasic basicfunctional functional or or regulatory regulatory level. level. TLG Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Section 6, Page 44 of 6, Page of 6 TABLE 6.16.1
SUMMARY
OF DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS
SUMMARY
OF DECOMMISSIONING ELEMENTS DECON (thousands of (thousands of 2012 dollars) Cost Element Total Decontamination 25,126 1 2.4 Removal 191,180 18.2 27,715 Packaging 1 2.6 Transportation 13,229 1.3 Waste Disposal 80,391 Off-site Waste ProcessL *n 14,4641 1.4 Pro am Mana ement ^^^ 421,449 40.1 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 12,176 1.2 Spent Fuel (Direct Costs) [21 144,4491 13.7 Insurance and Re ulator Fees 19,482 ! 1.9 Energy 19,4671 1.9 ~-,~---" Characterization/Licensing Surveys 27,9111 2.7 Property Taxes_ 44,649 j - - - - - - - - - -4.2 Miscellaneous Equipment ui ment 6,738 0.6 Site 0&M 3,3971 0.3 Total Total [3^ [3] 1,051,82 1,051,824 100.0 Cost Element Total NRC License Termination NRC License Termination 732,894 69.7 S ent Fuel Sent Fuel Mana ement ement 217,632 20.7 SiteRestoration Site Restoration
*, ____ , _ _ _ '*_m' __ *_ _ _ .' _ _ _ _ *, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ** __ M _ _ _ " _ _ _ ** -
I t " - - - 101,298 101,298
. ~ - - - , ~ - -
9.6 I Total [31 1,051,824 1 1,051,824 100.0 Ill [IJ Includes security and and engineering engineering costs costs 121 [2J Excludes program management managementcostscosts (staffing) (staffing) but but includes includes costs costs for for spent spent loading/transfer/spent fuel fuel loading/transfer/spent fuelpool pool O&M O&M and and EP EP fees fees [31 [3J Columns may not add due to rounding TLG TLG Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6,6, Page 55 of of 6 TABLE 6.2 6.2
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
OF OF DECOMMISSIONING DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS ELEMENTS DELAYED DECON (thousands of (thousands of 2012 dollars) r~~- stElement Cost Element .~~---- Total Percenta~e Percentage Decontamination 32,855 2.9 Removal 185,721 J 16.4 Packa ' 'n n 17,477,1 1.5 Transportation _________ 9,194 0.8 Waste Disposal 42,172 1. 3.7 Off--site Waste Processinj 17,240 1.5 Program Management M 578,327 50.9 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 12,176 1.1 Spent Fuel Direct Costs [21 74, 6.5 Insurance and Regulatorv Fees 27,9421 2.5 31,9691 2.8 2.6 Characterization/Licensing Characteriza tionlLicensin Surveys 29,549 1 2.6 _J::)~():Re~¥ Property Taxes_ __ 53,4731 4.7 MiscellaneousEE ui Miscellaneous ui ment ment 13,600 1.2 Site O&M O&M 9,7181 9,718 0.9 Total [3] I 1,135,501 100.0 Cost Element ostElement Total 1 Percentage I Percent NRC License Termination 666,212 58.7 Spent Fuel Management 367,871 32.4 . Site Restoration 8.9 [3] Total [31 1,135,501 100.0 111 [lJ Includes security and engineering engineering costs [21 [2J Excludes program management management costs costs (staffing) (staffing) but but includes includes costs costs for for spent spent fuelloading/transferlspent fuel pool fuel loading/transfer/spent fuel pool O&M O&M and and EP EP fees fees [31 [3J Columns may not add due to rounding TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station DocumentE16-1640-006, Document E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Section 6,6, Page of 66 Page 66 of TABLE 6.3
SUMMARY
OF DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS
SUMMARY
OF DECOMMISSIONING ELEMENTS SAFSTOR (thousands (thousands of of 2012 dollars) 2012 dollars) I []'ost Cost Element Tot Total .1 T10 Percentage ent~a.,. I Decontamination Decontamina tion 32,644 32,644 2.5 I Removal I 187,109 14.1 Packaging 16,3491I 16,349 1.2 r" Tran Tr~nsportation ortation __ - -- - 7,9891
--~--*~'
0.6 Waste Disposal i 38,122 2.9 __Qlf~~!te Off-site W l:l_ste~!:Qce~§inJL Waste Processing ______J 17,343 1.3 Program Management[1] Pro am Management [1] i 609,045 609045 45.8 Spent Fuel Fuel Pool Pool Isolation 12,176 0.9 Spent Fuel Fuel Direct (DirectCostsCosts)[21 [2] I 140,812 10.6 Insurance Insurance and and Regulatory Re ulator Fees Fees !
` 57,273 4.3 Energy
~~E-..!:l:~gy~__ 38,925 2.9 Characterization/Licensing Characterization/LicensinSurveys Surve s ! 29,549 2.2 "O_"J~~!:QP~rt.y Proerty Taxes Tax~~ _ _ _ _o_._ _ _ _ _L_~,510 92,510 7.0 Miscellaneous MiscellaneousEquipment E ui ment I 26,121 26 121 2~6-2.0
- . Site O&M O&M 22,606 1.7 Total al [3]
- 1,328,572 100.0
~ost Cost Element Total Percentage Percentage NRC License Termination 949,951 71.5 Spent Fuel Management 277,213 ' 20.9 Site Restoration
---"-.-...--"-.. ~---.--"-->>--.----.----.-'-.--.'--.-.- . _-._. __.__._--_. ___191,4~
101,4081 _ . 7.6 _ _ _ 0 _ _* *
- _ " -
I Total Total [31 [3] 1,328,572 1.328.572 ( 100.0 [11 [lJ Includes security and engineering engineering costs costs 1'] [2J Excludes program management managementcosts costs (staffing) (staffing) but but includes includes costs costs for for spent spent loading/transfer/spent fuel fuel loading/transfer/spent fuel poolpool O&M O&M and and EP EPfees fees [31 [3J Columns may not add due to rounding TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Document E16-1640-006, Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 11 of 7, Page of 3
- 7. REFERENCES
- 1. "Decommissioning Cost "Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis for for the Clinton Power Power Station,"
Station," Document Document No. No. E16-1555-005, Rev. Rev. 0, 0, TLG Services, Inc., October 2007
- 2. U.S. Code U.S. Code of of Federal Federal Regulations, Regulations,TitleTitle 10, 10, Parts Parts 30, 30, 40, 40, 50, 50, 51, 51, 70 70 and and 72, 72, "General Requirements "General Requirements for for Decommissioning Decommissioning Nuclear Nuclear Facilities,"
Facilities," Nuclear Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Commission, Federal Register Volume Volume 53, 53, Number 123 (p 24018 et seq.), June 27, seq.), 27, 1988 1988
- 3. U.S.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Regulatory Commission, Commission, Regulatory Regulatory GuideGuide 1.159, 1.159, "Assuring "Assuring the Availability of Funds for for Decommissioning Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors," Reactors," Rev. 2, 2, October October 2011
- 4. U.S.
U.S. Code Code ofof Federal Regulations, Title 10, Regulations, Title 10, Part Part 20, 20, Subpart SubpartE,E,"Radiological "Radiological Criteria for License Termination" Criteria 5.
- 5. U.S.
U.S. Code Code of of Federal Federal Regulations, Title 10, Regulations, Title 10, Parts 20 20 and and 50, 50, "Entombment "Entombment Options for Power Reactors," Advanced Notice of Proposed Proposed Rulemaking, Rulemaking, 66 Fed. Reg. 52551, October October 16, 16, 2001 2001
- 6. U.S. CodeCode of of Federal Regulations, Federal Regulations, Title10,10,Parts Title Parts2,2, 50 50 and and 51,51, "Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 61 Fed. Reg. 39278, July July 29, 29, 1996 1996
- 7. Waste Policy "Nuclear Waste Act of Policy Act of 1982 1982 andand Amendments,"
Amendments," U.S. U.S. Department Department of of Energy's Office of of Civilian Civilian Radioactive Radioactive Management, Management, 1982 1982
- 8. Settlement: Exelon Settlement: and the U.S.
Exelon and U.S. Department Department of of Justice, Justice, in in close close consultation consultation with the the DOE, DOE, under under which which thethegovernment government will will reimburse reimburse Exelon Exelon forfor costs costs associated with storage of spent associated spent fuel fuel at the company's company's nuclear stations pending pending DOE fulfilling DOE fulfilling its contractual contractual obligation obligation toto accept accept commercial commercial spentspent nuclear nuclear fuel. Additional amounts reimbursed fuel. reimbursed annually annuallyforforfuture futurecosts. costs.August August5,5,2004 2004
- 9. U.S.
U.S. Code Code of Federal Federal Regulations, Regulations, Title Title 10, 10, Part Part50,50,"Domestic "DomesticLicensing Licensing of of Production and and Utilization UtilizationFacilities," Facilities,"Subpart Subpart54 54(bb), (bb),"Conditions "Conditionsof of Licenses" Licenses"
- 10. U.S.
U.S. Code Code of of Federal Federal Regulations, Regulations, TitleTitle 10, 10, Part 72, 72, Subpart Subpart K, K,"General "General License for for Storage of Spent Spent Fuel at Power at Power Reactor Sites" Sites" TLG TLG Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Page 22 of Section 7, Page of 3
- 7. REFERENCES (continued)
- 11. "Low-Level Radioactive "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Waste Policy,"
Policy," Public Public Law Law 96-573, 96-573, 1980 1980
- 12. "Low-Level Radioactive "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Amendments Act Act of of1985,"
1985," Public PublicLaw Law99 240, January 240, January 15, 15, 1986 1986
- 13. U.S. Code Code of of Federal Federal Regulations, Title 10, PartPart 61.55 61.55 "Waste
Waste Classification" Classification"
- 14. U.S. Code U.S. Code of of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Regulations, Title 10, Part Part 20, 20, Subpart SubpartE,E,"Radiological "Radiological Criteria for for License Termination," Federal Federal Register, Register, Volume Volume 62, Number 139 139 (p(p 39058 et seq.), July July 21, 21, 1997 1997
- 15. "Establishment of "Establishment of Cleanup Cleanup Levels Levels for for CERCLA CERCLA Sites Sites with withRadioactive Radioactive Contamination," EPA Contamination," EPA Memorandum MemorandumOSWER OSWERNo. No. 9200.4-18, 9200.4-18, August August22, 1997 22,1997
- 16. U.S. Code Code of of Federal Federal Regulations, Regulations, Title Title 40, 40, Part Part141.16, 141.16,"Maximum
Maximum contaminant levels for for beta particle particle and and photon photon radioactivity radioactivity from from man-made man-made radionuclides in community community waterwater systems" systems"
- 17. "Memorandum of
Memorandum of Understanding Understanding Between Between the the Environmental Environmental Protection Protection Agency and Agency and the Nuclear Nuclear Regulatory Regulatory Commission:
Commission: Consultation and and Finality Finalityon on Decommissioningand Decommissioning and Decontamination Decontamination of of Contaminated Contaminated Sites,"Sites," OSWER OSWER 9295.8-06a, October 9, 2002 9,2002
- 18. "Multi-AgencyRadiation
Multi-Agency Radiation Survey Survey and Site Site Investigation InvestigationManual Manual(MARSSIM),"
(MARSSIM)," NUREG-1575, Rev. Rev. 1,1, EPA EPA 402-R-97-016, 402-R-97-016, Rev. 1, 1, August August 2000 2000
- 19. T.S. LaGuardia et T.S. et al.,
al.,"Guidelines "Guidelines for for Producing Producing Commercial Commercial Nuclear Nuclear Power Power Plant Decommissioning Plant Decommissioning Cost Cost Estimates," Estimates,"AIF/NESP-036, AIF/NESP-036, May May 1986 1986
- 20. Manion and W.J. Manion and T.S.T.S.LaGuardia, LaGuardia,"Decommissioning "Decommissioning Handbook,"
Handbook," U.S. U.S. Department of Department ofEnergy, Energy,DOE/EV/10128-1, DOE/EV/10128-1, November November 19801980
- 21. "Building Construction "Building Construction Cost Data Data 2012,"
2012," Robert Robert Snow Snow Means Means Company, Company, Inc.,Inc., Kingston, Massachusetts Kingston, Massachusetts
- 22. Project and Cost Project Cost Engineers' Engineers' Handbook, Handbook, Second Second Edition, Edition, p.p. 239, 239, American American Association of Cost Cost Engineers, Marcel Marcel Dekker, Dekker, Inc.,
Inc., New New York, York, New New York, York, 1984 1984 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Page 33 of Section 7, Page of 3
- 7. REFERENCES (continued)
- 23. DOE/RW-0351, "Civilian DOElRW-0351, "Civilian Radioactive Radioactive Waste Management Management System System Waste Waste Acceptance System Requirements RequirementsDocument",
Document",Revision Revision5,5,MayMay31, 2007 31,2007
- 24. "Civilian Radioactive Radioactive WasteWaste Management Management SystemSystem Requirements Requirements Document, Document, DOE/RW-0406, Revision 8, September DOEIRW-0406, Revision 8, September 2007 2007
- 25. "Strategy for "Strategy for Management Management and and Disposal Disposal ofofGreater-Than-Class Greater-Than-Class CCLow-LevelLow-Level Radioactive Waste,"
Radioactive Waste," Federal Register Volume Volume 60, Number Number 48 48 (p (p 13424 13424 et etseq.), seq.), March 1995 1995
- 26. U.S. Department Department of of Transportation, Transportation,TitleTitle49 49of ofthe theCode Codeof ofFederal FederalRegulations, Regulations, "Transportation," PartsParts 173 173 through through 178 178
- 27. Tri-State Motor Motor Transit Company, Company, published published tariffs, tariffs, Interstate InterstateCommerce Commerce Commission (ICC),
Commission (ICC), Docket No. MC-427719 MC-427719 Rules Rules Tariff, Tariff, March 2004, March 2004, Materials Tariff, Radioactive Materials Tariff, August August 2011 2011
- 28. Evans et J.C. Evans et al.,
aI.,"Long-Lived "Long-Lived Activation Activation Products Products in in Reactor Reactor Materials" Materials" NUREG/CR-3474, NUREG/CR-3474, Pacific PacificNorthwest Northwest Laboratory Laboratory for for the Nuclear Nuclear Regulatory Regulatory Commission, August 1984 1984
- 29. R.I.
R.I. Smith, G.J. G.J. Konzek, Konzek, W.E. W.E. Kennedy, Kennedy, Jr., Jr., "Technology, "Technology, Safety and and Costs Costs ofof Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized Water Reactor Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station," Power Station," NUREG/CR-0130 NUREG/CR-0130 and and addenda, addenda, Pacific Pacific Northwest Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Nuclear Commission, June Regulatory Commission, June 1978 1978
- 30. H.D. Oak, et et al.,
aI., "Technology, "Technology, Safety Safety and and Costs Costsof of Decommissioning Decommissioning aa Reference Reference Boiling Water Reactor Reactor Power Power Station," Station," NUREG/CR-0672 NUREG/CR-0672 and addenda, addenda, Pacific Pacific Northwest Laboratory Laboratory for for the the Nuclear Nuclear Regulatory Regulatory Commission, Commission, JuneJune1980 1980
- 31. "Microsoft Project "Microsoft Project 2010,"
2010," Microsoft Microsoft Corporation, Corporation, Redmond, WA
- 32. "Atomic Energy Act of 1954," (68 (68 Stat. 919) 919)
TLG TLG Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix A. Page Appendix A, of44 Page 11 of APPENDIX APPENDIX A DEVELOPMENT UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix A,A. Page of 4 Page 2 of APPENDIX APPENDIX A UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT Example: Unit FactorFactor for for Removal of Contaminated Heat Exchanger<< 3,000 Heat Exchanger 3,000 lbs. lbs.
- 1. SCOPE Heat exchangers exchangers weighing weighing << 3,000 3,000 pounds pounds willwill be be removed removed inin one one piece piece using using aa crane or small hoist. They will be disconnected disconnected from from the the inlet inlet and outlet outlet piping.
piping. The heat exchanger exchanger will be sent sent to the the waste waste processing processing area. area.
- 2. CALCULATIONS Activity Critical Act Activity Duration Duration ID Description (minutes) (minutes)*
a Remove insulation Remove insulation 60 (b) b Mount pipe cutters 60 60 c Install contamination Install contamination controls controls 20 (b) d Disconnect inlet Disconnect inlet and outlet lines 60 60 e Cap openings 20 (d) f Rig for removal 30 30 g Unbolt from from mounts 30 30 h Remove contamination Remove contamination controls 15 15 Ii Remove, wrap, Remove, wrap, send to waste processing area area 60 60 Totals (Activity/Critical) 355 255 Duration adjustment(s): adjustment(s):
+ Respiratory protection adjustment adjustment(50% (50% ofof critical duration) duration) 128 + RadiationlALARA Radiation/ALARA adjustment adjustment (37%
(37% of critical duration) duration) 95 Adjusted work duration 478
+ Protective clothing adjustment adjustment (30%(30% of adjusted duration) duration) 143 work duration Productive work 621 + Work Work break break adjustment adjustment(8.33 (8.33 %% of of productive duration) duration) 52 Total work duration (minutes)
(minutes) 673
***Total
*** Total duration =
duration = 11.217 11.217 hr hr***
- alpha designators indicate activities that that can can be be performed performed in parallel parallel TLG TLG Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station DocumentE16-1640-006, Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Appendix A. Page Appendix A, of 4 Page 33 of APPENDIX APPENDIX A (continued)
- 3. LABOR REQUIRED Crew Number Duration Rate Cost (hours) ($/hr)
Laborers 3.00 11.217 $46.15 $1,552.99 Craftsmen 2.00 11.217 $55.37 $1,242.17 Foreman 1.00 11.217 $58.54 $656.64 General Foreman 0.25 11.217 $60.07 $168.45 Fire Watch 0.05 11.217 $46.15 $25.88 Health Physics Technician 1.00 11.217 $70.20 $787.43 Total labor cost $4,433.56
- 4. EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT & & CONSUMABLES CONSUMABLES COSTS COSTS Equipment CostsCosts none none Consumables/Materials Costs ConsumableslMaterials Costs Blotting paper5050@@$0.59 Blotting paper $0.59sqsqft ft{1}
{I} $29.50 Tarpaulin 12 Tarpaulin 12 mils, mils, oil oilresistant, resistant,fire fireretardant retardant 5050
@@$0.27/sq
$0.27/sqftft(2)
{2} $13.50 Gas torch torchconsumables consumables1 1@@$10.56/hr
$10.56/hrx x1 1hrhr {3}
{3} $10.56 Subtotal cost of equipment and materials materials $53.56 Overhead & profit on equipment equipment and and materials materials@ @ 16.25 16.25% % $8.70 Total costs, equipment & material $62.26 TOTAL COST: Removal of contaminated heat exchanger <3000 < 3000 pounds: pounds: $4,495.82 Total labor labor cost: cost: $4,433.56 equipment/material costs: Total equipment/material costs: $62.26 Total craft labor man-hours required per unit: 81.884 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix A,A, Page of 4 Page 4 of
- 5. NOTES AND AND REFERENCES REFERENCES
" Work difficulty Work factors were difficulty factors were developed developed in conjunction conjunction with with the theAtomic Atomic Forum's (now Industrial Forum's program to (now NEI) program to standardize standardize nuclear nuclear decommissioning cost decommissioning costestimates estimates and and are delineated delineated in in Volume Volume 1, 1, Chapter Chapter 55 of the of the "Guidelines "Guidelines for for Producing Producing Commercial Commercial Nuclear Nuclear Power Power Plant Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates,"
Estimates," AIF/NESP-036, AIF/NESP-036, May May1986. 1986.
" References for References for equipment & & consumables costs:
www.zncmaster.com online catalog, McMaster Carr Spill Control
- 1. www.mcmaster.com Control (7193T88)
R.S. Means (2012)
- 2. RS. (2012) Division 01 56, Section Section 13.60-0600, 13.60-0600, page page 22 22 R.S. Means (2012)
- 3. RS. (2012) Division 01 54 33, Section 5433, Section 40 - 6360, page 674 40-6360,
- Material and and consumable consumable costs were adjusted using using thethe regional regional indices indices for for Bloomington, Illinois.
TLG Services, Inc. TLG Inc.
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Appendix B, Page Appendix of 7 Page 11 of APPENDIX B APPENDIXB UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING LISTING (DECON: (DECON:Power Power Block Block Structures Only) Structures Only) TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 2 of of 7 APPENDIXB APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING LISTING (Power Block Structures Structures Only) Only) Unit Cost Factor CostlUnit Cost/Unit Removal of of clean cleaninstrument instrument and and sampling samplingtubing, tubing,$/linear
$Ilinearfoot foot 0.50 clean pipe 0.25 Removal of clean 0.25 to 2 inches inches diameter, diameter, $/linear
$Ilinearfoot foot 5.32 clean pipe >2 Removal of clean >2 to to 4 inches diameter, diameter, $/linear
$Ilinearfoot foot 7.51 clean pipe >4 to Removal of clean to 8 inches diameter, diameter, $/linear
$Ilinearfoot foot 14.41 clean pipe >8 to Removal of clean to 14 inches diameter, diameter, $/linear
$Ilinearfoot foot 28.05 Removal of clean clean pipe >14
>14 to to 20 20 inches diameter, diameter, $/linear
$Ilinearfoot foot 36.41 clean pipe Removal of clean pipe >20
>20 to to 36 36 inches inches diameter, diameter, $/linear
$Ilinearfoot foot 53.58 clean pipe >36 Removal of clean >36 inches diameter, diameter, $/linear
$Ilinearfoot foot 63.69 Removal of clean clean valve >2 to 4 inches 95.96 Removal of clean clean valve >4 to 8 inches 144.07 Removal of clean valve >8 to 14 inches 280.50 Removal of clean valve>
valve >14 14 to 20 inches 364.08 Removal of clean clean valve >20 to 36 inches 535.81 Removal of clean valve >36 inches 636.90 Removal of of clean clean pipe pipe hanger hanger for for small bore piping 32.02 clean pipe hanger Removal of clean hanger for for large large bore bore piping piping 117.22 clean pump, <300 pound Removal of clean 241.72 Removal of clean clean pump, 300-1000 300-1000 pound pound 666.04 Removal of clean pump, 1000-10,000 1000-10,000 pound pound 2,649.79 clean pump, > Removal of clean >10,000 10,000 pound 5,120.32 clean pump motor, 300-1000 pound Removal of clean 279.86 clean pump motor, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of clean 1,103.10 clean pump motor, >10,000 pound Removal of clean 2,481.96 clean heat Removal of clean heat exchanger <3000 pound 1,420.74 clean heat Removal of clean heat exchanger exchanger >3000
>3000 pound pound 3,570.42 Removal of ofclean cleanfeedwater feedwaterheater/deaerator heater/deaerator 10,080.07 Removal of ofclean clean moisture moisture separator/reheater separator/reheater 20,743.01 clean tank, Removal of clean tank, <300 gallons 311.12 clean tank, Removal of clean tank, 300-3000 300-3000 gallon 983.41 Removal of of clean clean tank, tank, >3000 gallons, gallons, $/square foot foot surface surface area 8.15 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Appendix B, Page Appendix of 77 Page 33 of APPENDIXB APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING LISTING (Power Block Structures Structures Only)Only) Unit Cost Factor CostlUnit Cost/Unit clean electrical equipment, <300 Removal of clean <300 pound pound 132.25 Removal of clean clean electrical equipment, equipment, 300-1000 300-1000 pound pound 455.66 clean electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 Removal of clean 1000-10,000 pound pound 911.31 clean electrical equipment, >10,000 Removal of clean >10,000 pound pound 2,157.46 clean electrical Removal of clean electrical transformer transformer < 30 tons 1,498.33 Removal ofof clean clean electrical electrical transformer> transformer > 30 tons 4,314.91 clean standby Removal of clean standby diesel generator, <100 kW 1,530.41 clean standby diesel generator, Removal of clean generator, 100100kWkWto to 11MW MW 3,415.99 Removal of clean clean standby diesel generator, generator,>1 >1 MW MW 7,071.76 clean electrical Removal of clean electrical cable cable tray, $/linear
$Ilinear foot foot 12.34 Removal of clean electrical conduit, $/linear
$Ilinearfoot foot 5.39 Removal of clean Hemoval clean mechanical mechanical equipment, equipment, <300 pound 132.25 clean mechanical equipment, Removal of clean equipment, 300-1000 300-1000 pound pound 455.66 clean mechanical equipment, Removal of clean equipment, 1000-10,000 1000-10,000 pound pound 911.31 clean mechanical equipment, Removal of clean equipment, >10,000
>10,000 pound pound 2,157.46 Removal of clean HV HVAC equipment, <300 pound AC equipment, pound 159.92 Removal of clean HVACHVAC equipment, equipment, 300-1000 300-1000 pound pound 547.50 Removal of clean HVACHVAC equipment, equipment, 1000-10,000 1000-10,000 pound pound 1,091.18 Removal of clean clean HVAC HVAC equipment, equipment, >10,000 pound pound 2,157.46 Removal of clean HV HVAC ductwork, $/pound AC ductwork, 0.52 Removal of ofcontaminated contaminated instrument instrument and andsampling samplingtubing, tubing,$/linear
$Ilinearfoot foot 1.71 contaminated pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter, $/linear Removal of contaminated $/linear foot foot 22.81 Removal of of contaminated contaminated pipe >2 >2 to to 4 inches inches diameter, $/linear
$Ilinear foot foot 38.91 Removal of of contaminated contaminated pipe >4 to 88 inches inches diameter, $/linear
$Ilinear foot foot 61.96 Removal of of contaminated contaminated pipe >8 to 14 inches diameter, $/linear $Ilinear foot foot 121.25 Removal of of contaminated contaminated pipe >14 >14 to to 20 20 inches inches diameter, $/linear
$Ilinear foot foot 145.70 Removal of of contaminated contaminated pipe >20 >20 to to 36 36 inches inches diameter, $/linear
$Ilinear foot foot 201.88 Removal of of contaminated contaminated pipe >36 inches diameter, $/linear $Ilinear foot foot 238.74 contaminated valve >2 to 4 inches Removal of contaminated 478.50 contaminated valve >4 to 8 inches Removal of contaminated 569.79 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station DocumentE16-1640-006, Document E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Appendix B, Page Appendix of 7 Page 44 of APPENDIXB APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Block Structures Structures Only) Only) Unit Cost Factor CostJUnit Cost/Unit Removal of contaminated contaminated valve valve >8
>8 to to 14 14 inches inches 1,162.49 contaminated valve Removal of contaminated valve >14
>14 toto 20 20 inches inches 1,477.66 contaminated valve Removal of contaminated valve >20
>20 toto 36 36 inches inches 1,968.80 contaminated valve Removal of contaminated valve >36
>36 inches inches 2,337.37 Removal ofof contaminated contaminated pipe hanger for small bore piping 157.65 Removal of contaminated contaminated pipe hanger hanger forfor large large bore bore piping piping 504.04 contaminated pump, <300 Removal of contaminated <300 pound pound 1,014.32 contaminated pump, 300-1000 Removal of contaminated 300-1000 pound pound 2,299.75 contaminated pump, 1000-10,000 Removal of contaminated 1000-10,000 pound 7,348.76 contaminated pump, >10,000 Removal of contaminated >10,000 pound pound 17,897.28 contaminated pump Removal of contaminated pump motor, motor, 300-1000 300-1000 pound 978.26 contaminated pump Removal of contaminated pump motor, motor, 1000-10,000 1000-10,000 pound 2,992.60 contaminated pump Removal of contaminated pump motor, motor, >10,000
>10,000 pound pound 6,718.78 Removal of of contaminated contaminated heat heat exchanger <3000 pound exchanger <3000 pound 4,495.82 contaminated heat Removal of contaminated heat exchanger exchanger>3000 >3000 pound pound 13,023.67 Removal of of contaminated contaminated feedwater heater/deaerator heater/deaerator 31,565.43 Removal of Removal ofcontaminated contaminated moisture moisture separator/reheater separator/reheater 68,525.37 contaminated tank, Removal of contaminated tank, <300
<300 gallons gallons 1,686.40 contaminated tank, Removal of contaminated tank, >300
>300 gallons, gallons, $/square
$/squarefoot foot 32.27 contaminated electrical equipment, Removal of contaminated equipment, <300 <300 pound pound 788.85 contaminated electrical equipment, Removal of contaminated equipment, 300-1000 300-1000 pound pound 1,870.74 Removal of of contaminated contaminated electrical equipment, equipment, 1000-10,000 1000-10,000 pound pound 3,602.26 contaminated electrical equipment, Removal of contaminated equipment, >10,000
>10,000 pound pound 6,977.40 contaminated electrical cable tray, $/linear Removal of contaminated $Ilinear foot foot 38.03 Removal of contaminated contaminated electrical electrical conduit, conduit, $/linear
$Ilinearfoot foot 17.94 Removal of of contaminated contaminated mechanical equipment, equipment, <300
<300 pound pound 877.99 contaminated mechanical equipment, Removal of contaminated equipment, 300-1000 300-1000 pound pound 2,067.28 contaminated mechanical equipment, Removal of contaminated equipment, 1000-10,000 1000-10,000 pound pound 3,974.28 Removal of of contaminated contaminated mechanical equipment, equipment, >10,000
> 10,000 pound pound 6,977.40 contaminated HVAC Removal of contaminated equipment, <300 HVAC equipment, <300 pound pound 877.99 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Document Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 55 of of 77 APPENDIXB APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING LISTING (Power Block Structures Structures Only)Only) Unit Cost Factor CostJUnit Cost/Unit contaminated HVAC Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, 300-1000 pound 2,067.28 Removal of contaminated contaminated HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound pound 3,974.28 contaminated HVAC Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, >10,000 pound 6,977.40 Removal of contaminated contaminated HVAC HVAC ductwork, $/pound $/pound 2.38 Removal/plasma arc cut of contaminated thin thin metal metalcomponents, components, $/linear
$Ilinearin.
in. 4.06 Additional decontamination decontaminationof ofsurface surface byby washing, washing, $/square
$/squarefoot foot 8.71 Additional decontamination decontaminationof of surfaces surfaces byby hydrolasing, hydrolasing, $/square
$/squarefoot foot 35.59 Decontamination rig Decontamination rig hook hook up up and andflush, flush, $/$/250 250 foot foot length length 7,431.42 Chemical flush of components/systems, components/systems, $/gallon$/gallon 17.64 clean standard Removal of clean standard reinforced reinforced concrete, concrete, $/cubic
$/cubic yard 138.42 Removal of grade slab concrete, concrete, $/cubic yard 185.40 Removal of clean concrete floors, $/cubic yard 362.29 Removal of sections sections of of clean clean concrete concrete floors, floors, $/cubic yard 1,077.74 Removal of clean heavily heavily rein rein concrete concrete w/#9 wl#9 rebar, rebar, $/cubic yard 233.53 Removal of contaminated heavily heavily rein rein concrete concrete w/#9 wl#9 rebar, rebar, $/cubic yard 2,155.48 Removal of clean clean heavily rein concrete w/#18 wl#18 rebar, $/cubic
$/cubic yard yard 295.12 Removal of contaminated contaminated heavily rein concrete rein concrete w/#18 rebar, $/cubic
$/cubic yard 2,851.79 Removal heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar & steel embedments, wl#18 rebar embedments, $/cubic
$/cubic yard yard 449.06 Removal of below-grade below-grade suspended suspended floors, floors, $/cubic
$/cubic yard yard 362.29 clean monolithic concrete structures, Removal of clean structures, $/cubic
$/cubic yard yard 892.75 contaminated monolithic concrete structures, Removal of contaminated structures, $/cubic
$/cubic yard yard 2,150.15 Removal of clean foundation concrete, concrete, $/cubic
$/cubic yard yard 701.09 contaminated foundation Removal of contaminated foundation concrete, concrete, $/cubic
$/cubic yard yard 2,003.09 Explosive demolition of bulk concrete, $/cubic yard
$/cubic yard 30.36 Removal of clean hollow masonry masonry block wall, $/cubic yard
$/cubic yard 101.08 Removal of contaminated contaminated hollow hollow masonry masonry block block wall, wall, $/cubic
$/cubic yard 368.53 Removal of clean solid masonry masonry block block wall, wall, $/cubic
$/cubic yard yard 101.08 contaminated solid Removal of contaminated solid masonry masonry block block wall, wall, $/cubic
$/cubic yard yard 368.53 below-grade voids, $/cubic yard Backfill of below-grade 32.64 Removal of Removal of subterranean subterranean tunnels/voids, $/linear
$/linear foot foot 115.34 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station E16-1640-006, Document E16-1640- 006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis Appendix B, Page Appendix of 77 Page 66 of APPENDIXB APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING LISTING (Power Block Structures Structures Only) Only) Unit Cost Factor CostJUnit Cost/Unit Placement of Placement of concrete concrete for for below-grade below-grade voids, voids, $/cubic
$/cubic yard yard 123.83 Excavation of clean clean material, $/cubic
$/cubic yard 3.20 contaminated material, Excavation of contaminated material, $/cubic
$/cubic yard 42.17 Removal of clean clean concrete rubble (tipping (tipping fee included), $/cubic yard 23.59 Removal of contaminated contaminated concrete concrete rubble, rubble, $/cubic
$/cubic yard yard 26.58 Removal of building building byby volume, volume, $/cubic
$/cubic foot foot 0.30 Removal of clean clean building building metal metal siding, siding, $/square
$/squarefoot foot 1.21 contaminated building Removal of contaminated building metal metal siding, siding, $/square
$/squarefoot foot 4.66 standard asphalt Removal of standard asphaltroofing, roofing, $/square
$/squarefoot foot 2.32 Removal ofof transite transite panels, $/square
$/square foot foot 2.13 contaminated concrete Scarifying contaminated concrete surfaces surfaces (drill & spall),
(drill & spall), $/square
$/square foot foot 13.35 Scabbling contaminated contaminatedconcrete concretefloors, floors, $/square
$/squarefootfoot 8.23 contaminated concrete Scabbling contaminated concrete walls, walls, $/square
$/square foot foot 21.84 contaminated ceilings, Scabbling contaminated ceilings, $/square
$/square foot foot 75.05 structural steel, Scabbling structural steel, $/square
$/squarefoot foot 6.74 clean overhead Removal of clean overhead crane/monorail crane/monorail < 10 10 ton ton capacity capacity 629.42 contaminated overhead crane/monorail Removal of contaminated crane/monorail << 10 10 ton ton capacity capacity 1,926.24 Removal of clean clean overhead crane/monorail>
crane/monorail >10-5010-50 ton capacity capacity 1,510.62 contaminated overhead crane/monorail Removal of contaminated crane/monorail >10-50
>10-50 ton capacity capacity 4,622.18 Removal of polar crane>
crane > 50 ton capacity capacity 6,291.22 gantry crane> Removal of gantry crane > 50 ton capacity 26,968.26 Removal ofof structural structural steel, $/pound 0.20 Removal of clean clean steel floor floor grating, $/square
$/square foot foot 4.38 contaminated steel floor grating, $/square Removal of contaminated $/square footfoot 13.62 Removal of clean clean free free standing standing steel liner, $/square foot
$/square foot 12.22 Removal of Removal of contaminated contaminated freefree standing standing steel liner, $/square
$/square foot foot 37.75 Removal of clean clean concrete-anchored steel liner, $/square
$/squarefoot foot 6.11 contaminated concrete-anchored steel liner, $/square Removal of contaminated $/square foot foot 43.98 Placement of Placement of scaffolding in clean areas, areas, $/square
$/squarefoot foot 14.56 Placement of Placement scaffolding in of scaffolding in contaminated contaminated areas, areas, $/square
$/squarefoot foot 26.23 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
Clinton Power Station DocumentE16-1640-006, Document E16-1640-006, Rev. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, B, Page 77 of of 7 APPENDIXB APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only) Structures Only) Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit CostlUnit Landscaping with topsoil, $/acre
$/acre 27,956.74 Cost of CPC B-88 LSA LSA box & & preparation for use 2 ,023.74 2,023.74 Cost of CPC B-25 LSA LSA box & & preparation for use 1, 850.93 1,850.93 CPC B-12V Cost of CPC B-12V 12 12 gauge gauge LSA box &&preparation LSA box preparation for for use 1 ,507.79 1,507.79 Cost of CPC B-144 LSA LSA box & & preparation for use 10,334.90 LSAdrum Cost of LSA drum & & preparation preparation for use 192.28 cask liner Cost of cask liner for CNSI 8 120A cask (resins) 8,191.87 cask liner for CNSI Cost of cask CNSI 88 120A 120A cask cask (filters)
(filters) 8,033.05 Decontamination of surfaces with vacuuming, $/square $/square foot foot 0.79 TLG TLG Services, Services, Inc.
Station Clinton Power Station Document E16-1640-006, Rev. 0 Document E16-1640-006, Decommissioning Cost Cost Analysis Appendix C, C, Page 11 of of 11 APPENDIXC APPENDIX C DETAILED COST ANALYSIS DETAILED COST ANALYSIS DECON TLG TLG Services, Inc. Inc.
Clinton Pourer Clinton Power Station Station Document DocumentE16-1640-006, El6-1640-006. Re".Ret'.00 Decommissioning Cost Decommissioning Cost Analysis Analysis AppendixC, Appendix C.Page Page22ofof11 11 Table CC Table Clinton Power Clinton Power StationStation DEC ON Decommissioning DECON Decommissioning Cost Cost Estimate Estimate (thousands (thousandsof of2012 2012 dollars) dollars) Off*Site OiT--Sate LLR LLRW NRC NEC Spent Spent FFuel uel Site Site Prnrr0aed Proces5ed. Bartel BurinlVolumes Volumes Burinlf Burial / ------- Utility Utilityand and Activity Activity Decon De.eon Removal Rettmvsl Packu.ging Packaging Transport Transport Proceuing Proce ing Disposal Dispoml Ollter Other Total Total Total Total Lic. Lie. Term. Term. Management Management Restoration ReJitoration Vnlmne Volume Cass A Clll5sA Class B CIIl58B Close ClaDC C 0GTCC CC Processed Proceued Craft C,.rt Contractor Contructor lndrox Index Activit~ Descriptimt Activity Descriedon COlit Coat CO!fjt Cost COSt8 Co.,. Costs Coat. Costa Costs Cristo COIIt8 Costs Costs Cnutingroey Conting:nct C~.. Costs Cnatn co.t3 Co.. COMS c~ .. Costs Co. Cu. Feet Feet Cu. Cu. Feet Feet Co. Feet Cu. Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Feet Cu. Cu. Feet Feet Wt., Lbs. WL,Lbs. Moon nurs MnnhouOi Munhourn.._ Manhuurl'l PERIOD la PERIOD 1. -- Shutdown Shutdown through througb Transition Tramdtion P~nod 1a Forted toDin'Ct Dio.eDt"CommitllllOning Ikco,nmi.--ing Aaiviti,w Ali.lvitlll:l'I 11l.1.1 lu.i.l preliminaryde<<omminniuning Pr1.'jlafC preliminary Prepare tk',;:ommwioninucost fOljl 162 162 24 24 187 187 187 187 I,avo 1,:08) la.1.2 1".1? NolificationofofCvoantian Notilcntion Cl"slMllinn of ofOpemttonu OawrnlloR.\l 1n.1.3 in.l3 RI~ntove fud Remove fool & lIOurt"e mnterinl
& nrurco In&\t!fJal nI.
N. In.l.4 101.4 NohflClJtion Nolif lion of()fPertnsnent PermanentDefueiing Dcfllding In.1.5 tn.t.5 Dl'activote plant Deoetlvste aysh!tn"&&pea planttyst,mn p~_ Yl'l\>!-h' aaaa waste In.U\ 1" .1.6 Prulmre and Preporv and nuhmit SUOOlitPSDARPHDAR 200 250 :17 37 2ri7 287 287 287 2,)X0) In.l.7 Rl'vit:'w plant Review plantdwgs dwgs&&apses. II-l)OClS-.
- 7.
574 86 661 661 661 661 4,100)
.1 7 la.l.8 10.1.8 Perform detail Perfun. detnil ....ddrod flulaurvuy survey la.1.9 &timall' by by.pnx:lucl Inventory 125 185 10 19 1+1 144 1+1 144 1,106) t,(JO(l In.1.9 E44-1, tnod-t.n-nony In.1.10 in 11) End 11I"odud End productrn..'>I-('fiption d., iption 125 125 16, 19 19 H.
144 1+1 144 1,10X) 1,000 Ja.1.11 Ddnih>d by.pmdurttnventoey Detnibd by.produd Inventory 162 2. 24 187 167 187 187 1.:00) 1,:100 10.1.11 1Il.1.12 Define tm,jor Irnljof work work quan,e I<<'"qucn("'c 937 937 140 140 1,077 1,677 1,077 1,077 7.&0) 7,500 In.1.12 Define 3,100 lR.U3 1".1.13 Perform SER Perform HER and nnd EA EA :m77 .6 58 4.. 445 445 445 3,10(1 In.t.14 10.1.14 In.1.15 1..1.15 Pt,nOfill Site Perform Site Sjll,(,lfic Sp-the Cost PrcpJlln.J"ubmit Ltven.c Preponfnubuat CIMlI Study Study Liroost, Tl,nlllnaliOil Tam,inuton Plan Plnn 6'2-1 624 512 512 94 94 77 77 "8 718 5811 588 "8 718 58!1 588 5,b 5,000 4,10)6
",096 o) la.l.Hi ta.1.16 Rt~'iVtl NRC Rtnxeve NRCIljlPfUVfll nppeovnloftvrminnlioo of tennin,liaa plan plan AcllvllySI~,(:lficfttion$
Activity Sino ,Oeo)v.na In.l.17.1 1 n.1.i7.1 PInn1 Plnnt & & temlwrnry It'mpornryPnciiities fm:;llihes 614 614 IIi 92 707 707 ,;.;m 626 71 71 4,010
--I,!t.W In.I.17.2 Plonlny.Wmu 10.1.17.2 T'lnnl "yll-lpllUI 520 620 78 598 539 no 60 4,167
",Wi In.1.17.3 10.1.17.3 N&<;HDoconliulllnllliouF1u"h In.1.17A 1..1.17.4 Reactor NS.SS Ducontaminntivu Flu..sh Rt'ACtor internals internal" 887
""7 62 la:1 13:1 9 72 I,O'lO 1,020 1,020 72 5161 500 7,100 7,100 In.l.17 10.1.17.5 . 5 Rt'ariorvemwl Reactor vessel 812 122 .,'!"
9.33 933 6,5)0) 6,50() In.l.17.6 lu.7.17.6 Sacnfinalshidd 1,100) In.l.17.7 1..1.17.7 Mrnsture Snerifie,oi shield gcpaflltonJreru.fltl!NI Mointon...r1'.mtors/n!t,c"tarn 62 125 9 19 I' 72 144 144 72 144 144 rdw flOO 236 In.1.J7.8 i++.1.178 Rt'mftlrredooncrcle Rrtnfonvtleoncrat. 200 2)10 30 2aO 115 115 115 115 1. 600 In.1. 17.9 :\Inill In.1.17.9 Turbine Main Turbine 261
"'1 39 300
- 100 3101 300 In.1.17.10 1x.1.17.10 Mnin Alain Condt'lIl<t!rs 11-- 261 :19 3911 300 3011
- JOO 2,1)98 2.{i88 In.l.17.11
..1.1.11 Pn>oI\1:Illnll:lUPjlf'CAAItJllsleueture 7 Peeanur,nuppreanion l:Itrudun" 25{l 250 37 287 287 - 2,100) 2,O(jO In.1.17.12 Drywell 1 x.117. i2 Drywnil 200 ao 30 230 230 1,300) 1,60n 111.1.17.1:1 11.1.17,13 Plant la.l.li.l4-1..117.14 WMle atrudurt's && building.
Plantutrveturen Wanto managt!ml'nt nurnogement building" 390 396 574 58 1!6 86 448 run 661 224 6fil 661 224 224- 120
- 1,120 4,0)11
.,600 la.1.1715 FncililY&
1..1.17 15 Facility & !!itedOll(.l'Out it, via-nut 112 17 129 65 65 65 910)
!J(J()
10.1.17 lu.l.i7 Total Total 5.a:m 5,330 !lOO 600 6,130 5,596 - 534 Ii:!" 42,683 "2,683 P1"nnwg & Otto Promorssnrvr Prcpxredi.mnntling wrqucnee ,roo 45 345 34-5 345 2,401 2,-iOU Plan. pcep .& temp.ntver 2,900 4:15 435 :1,335
- 1,:1:15 3,:135 11 .1.2)1 Design water eie.n. up ay+lem 17.
175 2. 26 201 201 1,4)0) 1,40U 11.1 21 Rigging/C-1. Cold Envipsll, ulinglotc. 2,200 2,00) :130 330 2,5:0 2,5:10 2,530 I..t.22 Procure corkn/lim,eu & eonntinnra 154 23 177 177 1,2:0) 17,154 10.1 Subtotal Period 1, Activity Coutn 14,917 1",917 2,237 2,237 17,154 11),620 Hi,620 5:14 5:H 78,1009 Pt'noo Period 1. Ia Adklition.I Aciditlonai Ctffihj Costa 1n.2.1 i n.2.l ISFSI ISFSI r.,pan!4ltlll Esponnion 5,200 0) 780 5,980 5 5,9*' In.2 10.2 Sl.IbloUll Period til Snbtotol Period AddilumRI Costs la A+Idition,l Costs 5,200 6,p 0 780 5,lliMJ 5,980 5 5,980 Period Perim In 1. Collatcrnl COOl!l:I Cuil.lcrnl Costa In.:1.1 1x.3.1 Spent Sio,nt Fuel CalJltnlllnd NO Capital sad Tran",f"r Tnm.rer 12,051 12,051 1,b08 1,868 1:1,8.78 13,8.58 13,&58 l:I,&'l8 tn.3 1x.3 Suhtotfll Subtotal PcnooPureedInInCollult'rai C'11'4-1 Coots COl'-tl' 12,051 12,051 1,808 1,808 13,858 13,858 13,!)58 13,958 Pnrwd Period In PenIXI Dependent in Period D.'pendent Ctmto COl:Its In.4.1 1..4.1 IllSurnnl'e lumm^cv 2,178 218 2,396 2,393) 2,:iOO In 4-.2 1 u.4.2 Property Property ta:n'S tours la..,l.a ls,4.3 I1N~ltb 11-111, phY!4K-s phyuien !!uPlllwli\ nupj,lirs ,,:Ii 4x7 - - - 10. 109 547
.47 547 In.4..,1 1044 In..,l5 Heavy t."quipnwnt n:No) i tchyquipmamt omlnl "ro 4197 - - - 69 69 529 529 529 529 Iu.45 Dinp s^o1nfDAW Di"po!!ill afDAW generated gvnerutcd 1:1 13 2 36
- l6 11 11 61 61 61 61 3110 litO 12,190 U,I90 :m In.4.(\
I.. 4.)) Pllint Plant enc1'j.,'Y enertty budget budget 2,781 2,781 417 417 3,196 a,HlM :1,198
- 1,198 11'1.4.7 i..4.7 NRCFill1i9 NEC Fens 1,151 1,151 115 115 1,266 1,269 1,266 1,286 11l.4.8 I..4.8 Ena,rgency Plllnning EtmtfgL'OCY PI.nning F.l\'!!
Fees 2,-181 2,481 248 248 2,729 2,729 2,729 2,729 TLG TLC Services. Sereices, Inc. Inc.
Clillton Power Clinton Power Station Station Document Documellt EI6.1640-006, E1fi...1640~006. Rev.Rev. 00 Decommissioning DecornmiBllioning Cast Cost Analysis Analysis AppendixC, Appendix C. Page Page 33 of of 11 Il TableC Table C Clinton Power Station Clinton Power Station DECON Decommissioning DECON DecommissioningCost Cost Estimate Estimate (thousands (thousandsof of2012 2012 dollars) dollars) O Slte Off*Site LLRW LLI'W -_-- NRC NRC Spent Stwnt Feel Fuel Sit, Site Processed Processed Banal BuritdVotenws Volumes Bnrlni) Burial I Util tl and Utility ad I Activity Activity Decon Dec.. Removal R...-I Packaging: Pe kaging Transport Transport ProctWling Processing Disposal Disposal Other Other Total Total Total Tota) Lic. Lie. Term Term. Management Management Restoration RestoraHon Volume Volume Class) ClauA Class CJa88BB Class Cla..CC G CC GTCC Processed Processed Craft Craft Cont Contractor tar I lades Illdl'x Activit~ Dt'!:ICril:tiOll Activity D..criptinn C~t Cast Cost Cost CCosts sts Costll Casts Casu Co.. Costs Co.. Costs Cost COlltillliellC~ Contingency Costs C~" Co.,. Costs Cast. Costs Costs COSt8 Cu. Cu. Feet Feet Cu. Cu. Feet Feet Co. Cu. Peet Feet Cu.Cu. Feet Feet Co. Cu. Feet Feet Wt., Wt., Lbs. Lbs. Mar b urs Muuhours Ma 1 urs Muuhourlj Pllnod la Period Pcrxl - Dupoo hint COI!!~ 1, PCflud*D"peoo"ol Gals )rontinucd) (continued) 11l,*t9 10.4.9 Site O&M Coshl Gals 316 316 47 47 :163 363 363
- l6:J 10.4.10 la..&.10 Spt'otFool Stool FudPond Pool O&M O&M 777 777 117 117 893 893 89:1 893 1.1 4 .1)
If1A.1I ISFSI Operllhng ISFSI Operoling Gals Cmlw 91 91 14 14 105 105 105 195 10.4. InA.I:!12 .t;t'Cunly Stall Srknrity Co~l StofCost 7,158 7,158 1,074 1,074 8,232 8,232 6,232 8,2:12 157,471 lfii,471 10,4.13 1IlA.I:! Ullilty Staff Utility Slf Cafmt 33,037))
- 13,9.10 5,089 5,009 :m,019 30,019 :19,019
.19,019 4'23,415
*U:I,400 10.4 laA Suhtulal Period Sebtoutl Period to Penod.DclKmdeot 1aPeriod -Dulamdent Coots('Ollts 897 li97 13 13 2 36 36 50,862 50,862 7,528 7,528 69,aa7 59,:07 55,610 55,010 3,n7 3,727 610 610 12,1911 12,HlO 211 20 580,871 5till,871 lo.0 111.0 TOTAL PERJODPERIOD In lfi COST COST 8.7 897 1:1 13 36
- 3. 83,1729 83,O'l9 12,3.53 12,353 96,335 96,330 72,231 72,231 23,565 2:1,565 534 534 610 610 It,ISO 12,190 20 20 059,480 6f)9,480 PERIOD 16 PERIOD lb*- Decommissioning Decommissioning Preparutioll8Preparations P~'riod 11>
Parind lb Din.'<'t DiroctDt'C:Ommil'lJjwninl: Drrommiso,oniug Actlvilltl>! Ao604i,a Deteded Ddllllcd Work Work Pro<.'l..Jures P oxdureo Ib.l.l.1 16.1.1.) PlanllfY>ltcml! Plant nyn)cmn 591 8. 680 68 68 4,733 4,n:! 76.7.1.2 Ib.I.t.:.!: 16.7.1.3 Ib.1.1.:1 NSSS Drrantieveetson N&"lS Dt.'C:On!nminatlon Plush nl'm'lor internals Ram^ner internnin f1u"h 591 125 125 6(10 575 89 19 19 75 7' 144 144 574 574 012 612 144 144 574 674 1,109) I,UOO 4,)X5 4.f)OU 1,:1,511 Ih.1.U Remoining I>Ulldin~" R"IWlimng budding., 169 ICS 25 25 194 194 48 48 145 145 l,aSH th.U.S Ib 1.1.3 COD cno huulIin{.':!< hatningo && Nl" NI. 125 125 I. 19 144 144 144 144 L(Xs) I,noo lb.l.l.6 inrore ib-1.1.6 lnrore instrumentation instrunwntalion 125 125 I. 19 144 144 144 144 1,(X5 1,000 Ih.l.l.7 Rrznmvnl 16.1.1.7 HI'n1<1\'al pnmary cooillinnwni primary mmvrinnn-nt 250 25D 37 37 287 287 287 287 2,109) 2,llOO lb.1.1.8 lb R!~actorvf'","'1 I. !./:!. Ruocbrvrmmi 45:1 45:1 68 68 521 521 521 521 3,6:5 a,fhUl lb.1.1.0 Forility 111.1.1.9 CbwaooA FacilitydlMll1OU1 150 150 22 22 172 172 86 86 8. 86 1,115 1,tOO 16.1.1.10 Sacrificial xbiald Ib.1.1.10 Socnficinl llhidd 150 151) 22 22 172 172 172 172 1,2)91 1,20(J ll,.l. Ib.1.1.11i.ll Roinfor,odroncruto Reinfurccdconct'l'tc 125 125 I. 19 144 144 72 72 72 72 1.)101 1,000 Ih.l.l.12 Main lb.l.l.12 Moin Turbine Turbim! 260 260 3. 39 299 299 299 299 2)18)) 2,mm 16.1.1.13 Stoin 111.1.1.13 Conde-w" Main Condt'nlWf1'l 261 201 39 39 300 300 aoo 375 2,,1016 2,OMB 111.1.1.14 ~Iohutlre oreparnwl"# & ib.l.1.14 Meiotnrv,wporamn: &rohemero rohe-alt'rs 250 250 37 37 287 287 287 287 2,105 2,000 Ib.l.I.15 lb.1.1.15 Radwsnm Rndwa.d\' building bllilding 341 341 61 51 39'l 392 :153 353 3U 30 2,730 2,7:1Il 2,739 Ih.l.l.1fi Reartorbuilding 16.1.7.16 HCllflor building 341 341 61 61 aw..!; 3'92 353 a&:1 ;19 39 2,7:m Total :13,741 lb.l.l Ih.l.l 4,214 4,214 6:.12 632 4,&16 4,046 4,:t00 4,390 450 450 a3,74) 16.1.2 Ih.1.2 Doran De<<J1I NRSS NHSS 506 596 2118 208 .95 895 895 1,0077 th.1 16.) Sublntai Period Subtnb,l Penod Ib Ib Aetiv Achvily Ca.'!! .. 596 4,214 4,214 ~JO 9:10 5,740 5.740 5,290 5,215 4:w 450 1,007 1,067 :1:1,741 a:l,741 Pw'iod Ib Period IbAdditionot Additional Costs (AsU! 76.2.1 lh.2.1 Spout rud tipent fun! poolllwil1llOn pod ,solsbon 10,588 1,51!8 1,558 12,176 12,176 12,176 l1, 2 Ih.::!.2 Site Charactl'flUilloo Sittl Charsrtoricot,00 6,008 6,(018 1,1lli2 1,082 8.591 8,591 8,591 :ltl,500 10,852 to,H.'i:! lb.2 lb2 Suhtotal Subtotol Period Poriod IbIb Addih Addiuonal.. nal Coots C4:kll .. 17.100 17.196 .1,571 3,571 20,767 20,767 30,500 1)1,852 HI,KI}2 P.'nol 11, Cnllmornl I. W. P.'nf>!.! 16 .3.1 th:l.1 Dt~n D,.nn t"t)ulplY\cnl I,npment H41 841 - - - - 126 968 968 968
!l6I!
lb.3.2 DOC Batt rvlarnuon nxp,uixam 1,0aO 1,100 154
'64 1,184 l,lf1.1 1,104 1,184 Ib-3.3 Pr.... d... ring xmer 50570 16,657 54 16.3.4 Pan fun'&'! & mn iosioning rhemicol dt'COmmi-iooini: fhemirnl flu"hOuch wMle sooty 45 2 '"
19 49 260 711 3,123 3.123 93
- 60 825
""5 295 4,259 295 4,259 4,259
- 278 27M 751 751 Hi,657 80,156 tlO,OOO 5'
141 141 2 16.3.5 5,0,11 toil .ti,,.vorx*., Smallluolal1tlwfllK'll 22 0 0 2 2 Ih.:t6 16.3.6 Pll)!! Pilw cutting cutting e'luipment vvluip1mmt I,WO 1,1(5 - - - - 165 165 1,265 1,265 1.265 1,725 Ib.a.7 1b.3.7 D.oron Dora rig rig 1,500 1,533 225 1,725 1,725 1,725 It, 18 0,(Y25 th.as Slxmt Fud SPO:'111 Fwd Capital C.p,tol end Translcr And Tnll\"fl'f 6,trl5 904 6,029 6,9'l9 - 0,929 11,929 16.3 Ih.a SubtomlPeriod Suhtotal PenotIb ib CollakraJ Collol,'r.) C4JtIts C -t. 2,:>>18 2,388 1,ltrl 1,102 .6 68 :1:18 338 :1,216 7,0.')5 7,055 2,460 16,627 16,627 9,698 ti,tr19 6,929 278 278 751 751 96,662 96,662 195 195 Penal IbIhPermd.Dependrnt P\.~nod Perlod.DcpendentCones Co.. 1.Ii 76.4.1 lhA.l A.- n n.pphes.. DI'<XlI1IiUlI11Im :Ui 26 6 32 32 32 a2 IhA.2 ib-4.2 lll>1uTant't) Insurance - - - 812 81 HI 893 89:1 893 H"" IhA.:) 16.4.:) PmpcrtytaXt'll Proporty Into, 6,097 6]0 610 6,707 6,707 Ib.4.4 IhAA Ileollh physics Health supplies IJhYl'liCtlllUpplwlI 246 62 308 300 3{)8 308 16 .4.5 thA.5 Bevy equipveat nt'-uvy Il'lUiplTlI'nt mntm rentlll 2:n 231 - - - - - 35 266 266 265 266 16.4 .6 IbA.6 lb.-1.7 th4.7 Disposal ofDAW DWJlO#al Plant Plnnt of DAW glllll'ratc<i energy gonermul budget hudget 21 - 2,788 418 6 3,200 3,215 31. 3)1
- !,206 36 36 3,2(8'1 358 351! - - - 7,151) 7,1.')!) 12 12 IlI.HI 16.4.8 NRCFl't'S NRC Fwa 3:)5 335 34 360
- 169 369 369 7b.4.9 IbA.9 Emergency Planning Enwrgtlncy Planning Fros Fc<-'>' .54 954 95 1,049 1,049 - 1,049 l,W9 11,.4.1(7 IbA.to Site O&M fhuJ O&M CostsGals 158 24 1R2 1"" 182 Ill" IbA.li IhA.ll Spent Fuel Pad Srwnt Pool O&M O&M 38.
389 58 446 448 .. 4468 7'LG TLG Services" Sereices, Inc.
Clinton Power. Clinton Powe,* StationStation Document Document E16-EI6-164(J..006", llf!ll"R0 7640-006, lies. Decommissioning Caat Decamntieaioning Cost Analysis Analysis AppendixC, Appendix Page44of C. Page 0/11 11 TableC Table C Clinton Power Clinton Power StationStation DECON Decommissioning DECON DecommissioningCost Cost Estimate Estimate (thousandsof (thousands of2012 2012 dollars) dollars) OIT*Site O0Stte LLR LLRW NRC NRC Spent Spent Fuel Fuel Site Site Processed Processed Burisi Volumes BliriafVolumeli Burial Burinll / Utility Utilitymidand I Activity Activity Dl'con Dec.. Removal R,tnovnl Pnl'kaging Packaging Transport Transport ProcePlng Prot ing Dispos,al Disposal Other Other Total Total Total Total Lic. Lie. Term. Term. Msnngemeot Management Restoration Reatoration Volume Volume Cl-CliUUIA A Cl-CliUUI8 B Chas CliUUICC GT
"(;'1'CCC Processed Processed Craft Craft Contractor Contractor lndt>x Index Activitv Description Activity DNu*ription Cost Co., Cost Co., COlOts Co.,. Costlll Cots Costs C-1. Costs Costa Costs Costa COJltiuaenc Contingency Costa C~" Costa Costs Co..
Costs Coats Cos'" Co. Cu. Feet Feet Co. Cu. Feet Feet Cu. F....,t Cu. Cu, Feet Cu. Feet Feet Co. Cu, Feet Feet Wt., Lbt. Wt. Lb!!. Mootnurs Munbours Mouttnurs MuuhOlint PeriodIbIhPcri,d.Dvp.ndont Pori" PI>ritld*D"IM*o,kntC.mtx Co.!.lti. (continuod) {oontinuoo} IhA.l:! 16.4.1'2 ISFSt Opvra ISFSI Opcrallllg ti ng COSUI Coda 4" 46 7 53 53 - 5:1 5:1 IbA.l:l ib.413 Staff end Sl)l:lIrily StnfCnet Sv'ooly a,589 3,589 538 5,38 4,127 4,127 4,127 4,127 - 78,051 Ih...l.14 5,679 16.4.14 Ih...l.15 DOCStafTCost DOCSttICoot UlllityStafT(:o-..l 5,679 17,086 17,1186
""2 852 2.563 2,50 6,531 6,531 19,649 19,649 6,531 6,531 19,649 111,649 - -
63,789 213.:326 ib.4.15 Utility SIoR Coat Ih..& ib.4 Subtotal Penmi Subtotal Pcrirn.t It, th M Pilnod.Dt'Jlcndcnt nod-Depondvnt 2x,10 Co,,\.;;. 2. 26 477 477 , 1 21 21 :n,U34 37,934 5,:m~ 5,389 4:J.tUi5 43,865 42,305 42,305 1,549 1,.549 - 358 aSH - 7.159 7.159 12 H 356,066 a56,06H 103,822 th.O 16.0 PERIOD 11 TOTALS PERIOD PERIOD 2a PERIOD TOTAL PERIOD TOTAlS
- 2. ~- Large PERIOD Ib L.M. Comp Component COHT lb COST Rf'Ulovul onent Removal
- 1.010 3,010
- I,OW
- 1,0111 1,579 1,579 2,476 2,476 .
76 76 88 340 340 342 342 3,237 3,237 a,27:.!
- 1,972 66,399 86,399 149,428 149,428 12,:1*&9 12,349 24,702 24,702 86,981l 86,988 183,319 IH;I,319 78.061 79,061 150,291 150,291 8,479 8,479 32,044 32,044 400 4611 984
!lll4 636 n36 1,245 1,245 751 751 751 751 lOJ,H22 116,012 116,012 31 ,773 31,773 31,793
- 11,79:1 40 01,659 400,659 1,0&1,120 1.06U,I:19 P"rlod 2.
P,nod 2a Boot Dm*dDoornoosioning lli-commlsgiomngAetivittvaActivitilJIi! Nud.*JU SlmHu Nuvloxr SteamSIIl'ply SupplySY:!lh"{l\ Sy,uvn lfullloval Ito oval 2n.l.1.11 20.1,1. Rt'("Ift'ulllItmu Syaknn xemirculntiae, SY>'IINn Piping & Vnivex VnlvciI 57 57 54 II 11 15 15 - 79 79 - 65 65 282 282 282 282 5111 Mil - - 64,094 li4,094 1,943 I,H4;\ - 211.1.1.2 2n.1.12 2a.1.1.:1 CRD51n
?x.1.1.3 2a.1.1..&
62,323 1x.1.1.4 2a.l.I.5 ReoCI., 2x.1.1..5 RI't'Ift'ulation Pump Rrrirrolatioo CRDMo;! && NI" Rl'a('wrVIlAAeI Pump;) & Roocwr Vo,ovl Internsla Ht*aclorVIlIlSeI Vessel Hmnoval NI, Removal
& Mowry Internals Moton! 57 2:11 231 14H 94 49 191 191 04,100 4,104 7,IH9 7,879 53,5 lO,&m 161,880
- 1.222
- 1.222 14 14 5::1,,)
2,503 2,503 1,222 1,222 40 141 141 - 14 14 281 281 lfll 1111 25,186 25,188
- 1,827 3,827
- 16:1 363 363 363 120 120 278 278 HI,142 19,14 9,036 9,036 2
576 576 1.5::18 1,538 62,;)23
;.l5,644 25 ,644 576 576 1,538 1,538 62,323 fi2,323 25,644 25,644 50 2.'iO 2,473 2,473 6,985 7112 7112 14,388 14,:lliB 1,430 l,4aO 1,3211 l,a:tn 251,240 251,240 131,119 131,119 355,125 355,125 1,526,0150 1,5:!6.11'W) 1,998 l,rnm 8,471 8,471 411,7)0) 40,700 40,7161 040,700 1,7611 1,760 1,766 1.'i60 21l.1.1 90,363 20.1.1 Tumls Tolnle 587 112,274 2 ,274 14,66.1 14,663 3,9'12 3,922 14 14 29,6::14 29,634 721 727 28,642 28,642 101,362 90,:16.1 9O,3~1 50 250 25,169 25,1611 1,430 1,430 1,:1311 1,3:!O - 2,327,628 2,:127,628 93,813 9a,813 3,53)1 a,520 Removal of Motor Foio,y.," nt 20.1.2 \ lein Turbin.1;^ ^ eretar 4:11 431 324 324 7.
70 417 417 52 52 - 226 226 1,621 1,521 1,521 1,521 14,933 14,9:1;) 748 748 - - - 714,386 714,:186 7,802 7,1<<12 20.1.3 Moin Coo ,l.n ,o 1.:1:lB 1.338 1,118 1,118 242 1,437 1,437 180 180 - 743 743 5,058 5,058 5,058 5,958 51,490 51,490 2,581 2,581 - - 2,463,233 2,46:1,23:1 24,681 24,tiRl Coo od,og Coat, from Clean Bod,hng Demolition 20.1.4.1 Rmuto, Building 1,021 1,1)'11 - - - - - 15:1 158 1,174 1,174 1,174 1,174 11,4541 11,4fJJl 2x.1.4.2 Auxiliary Building 245 - - - 37 37 281 281 2!il 281 2,582 2,51:12 20.1.4. 3 Rndwo,ta Building 579 - - - 87 87 666 666 666 600 6,493 6,49;1 20.1.4.4 Tudone Ruild,ng &77 577 - - - 87 87 6ti4 1164 664 604 6,771 6,771 20.1.4 .5 Fuol Building 26M 268 - - - - - 40 40 309 309 309 3<J9 2,912 2,912 20.1.4 Total, 2,690 2,690 - - - - 404 404 3,094 3,094 3,094 3,094 30,209 30,209 Dlspo,;n1 Dinixnl of ufPIIlIIISy"lt'ms Plant. Syntoma 2a.1.5.1 2.1.5.1 Arid F,xd & Acid Fl'\ld & Handling handling :15
- 35 1 2 12 - - 11 II 60 60 00 493 4113 - - - - 20,012 20,012 573 57:l
- .l1l1.5.2 2n1.5.2 AuxilillfyStwun A,ixiiiory Stv.m 652 12 27 192 - 197 1,1180 1.IlHO 1,080 I,""" 7,613 7,61a - - - - 300,178
- I(W,178 111,682 ltl,il!tl ia.I.5.3 2x.1.5,3 Brt>lIthing Rrexlhing Air 44 - - 7 51 51 51 - - - 877 H77 21l.1.5'"
20.1.5.4 C02&GNltJmtnrPu'1W C02 & (n.nornwr Purge 19 19 3 2'2 :!2 22 - - 373 ai3 2n.l.55 1x.1.5.5 Cnu ..'!tic I1nndhng Cmtwlic Ilondling I. 18 0 1 5 - 5 "" 29 29 186 IH6 - - - - 7,571 7,571 285 285 2a.. 1.5,6 1.5.6 Ch~'m Rodwnxto n('p~"ing Chem Rl1Ilwali!to! Repnxw.v,ing & & DiollltMtll Dinpmol -479 479 508 68 58 50 .7 57 207 - 441
~ 1,811 l,tHl 1,611 1,811 2,244 2,244 3,043
- 1,04:1 - - 250,752 259,752 15564 15,fi6..I 2a.1.5.7 20.1.5.7 Chilled Chilled Water*Water RCA RCA - 1,395 24 58 407 - i421 ll 2,305 2,305 16,163 16,163 - - - - 656,386 656,386 22,847 22,8047
- la.!
Y0.75,8 5.1'1 Chillt'd Chiliad Wntcr WallJr Non-RCA Non-RCA 202 - - - m 30 232 232 232 - - - - 3,958 3,958
~fd.5,9 2..1.5.9 2a.l.a.to Chlormallon Chlortn,lion 20.1.5111 Cin-ulaling
('ovulating Water Wotor-RCA- RCA fit 51 207 14 34 237
- M 94 8 59 5Hli 585 585 5115 -
'9 59 -
9,4112 9,402 - - 381,817
- 1t1l,817 9""
988 3,5903 3,59() 2'a.l.5.1 ill. C,rcultting Wuh'r 2..1.5.11I Cu-culatmg 1 5.12 Cnlnmnt 20.1.5.12 Cntm-l Anx Watvr Noo* Aux&& Fool NonRCA Fuel Dldg nCA F.... jUlII Dram" Bldg Fototy Drxinn " 57 126 III 10 7 5
- UJ
- 10 -
a 42 8 65 220 2'20 220 220 6' 65 -
,04 204 427 427 32,517
- 12,517 1,093 t,Othl 2,127 2,127 2a.l.5.1:1 0,1.5,13 Cntnmn! Cntmm^l Aux & Fool FuO!i Bldg Dldi\ Floor Floor Droina Drain" 199 It, II. II 11 2tI 20 41 - 66 68 353 353 351 353 sua 803 584 5>14 - 65,560 65,560 3,408 3,408 2'a.I.5.14 Component Cooling
?x.1.5.14 Co.,W- t Cooling Wan, Non-RCA Water Non-RCA 137 - - - - m 21 158 168 158 158 - - - 2,681 2,681 2..1.5.15 ('ondt'nmtt" 211.1.5.15 Co.dxr. l,lti2 1.1 821 ato 320 2015 245 :147 347 97:1 973 - 659 3,726
- 1,726 3,726 3,728 - 1:1,775 1:1,775 13,946 1:J,!J4fi - - 1,350,699 l,:I50,fi99 21,288 21,268 2n.l 1,071 . 5.JIi OItldi>OlUlh'llotL"h'r 20.1.5.16 LonII,, t,r 1,071 fhl1 531 412 479 479 1.712 - ~
882 5,086 5,086 5,086 19,037 19,0:17 24,551 24,551 - - 2,164,864 2,Hl4,864 19,922 19,922
- la.I.5.17 2.-1.5.17 Conl, ('OOdl'oMle Polillhmg 9211 928 Il8 88 63 113 236 - ~6 376 1,755 1,71).')
1,755 4,485 4,485 3,4001
- 1,400 - - - 374,117 374,117 16,13:61 16,fl:lU
-=
211.1.5,18 2.15,16 Condenas ('ond"'Il$l!rVncuum Vxvuum 227 227 If. 17 36 255 - - 102 6:lli 61M 636 Il:IB 10,118 10,118 - - - - 410,897 410,897 3,912 a,912
- la.I.5,19 20.1-5 ,19 Conlainment Combu8Hbll' Ga>l 100 7 24 46,272 1,727 Contoiomvnt COmbnoltblu Con 1161 6 20 17 - 34 184 184 184 184 791 791 249 249 - - 46,272 1,727 21l.1.5.20 20.1.620 Cyd, 1,570 Cycit!dI 1-vodenaate CoodeoMtc 835 74 56 109 204 - 297 1,570 1,570 1,570 4,325 4,325 2,961 2,961 - - - :141,535
- 1041,5:15 14.418 14,418 2a.1.5.21 20.1.5. 21 DrywcllDrywall CodingCooling 634 32 36 144 7.
78 - ~ 208 1,132 1.132 1,132 1,132 5,706 5,706 1,113 1,113 - - - 294,892 294,H9"1 111,426 10,426 2n.1.5.22 20,1.5.22 Drywdl Drywall Purge Purge 181 19 21 70 5:1 53 - N 74 418 418 2,779 2,779 766 766 - - - 156,269 156,269 3,193 3,193
- la.1..1.2..1 20.1.5.23 ECCS ECCS Equipn~nt Cooling Euuipnnnt Cooling l!7 87 3 5 :10 30 4 - ~
28 vn 157 167 157 1,190 1,190 "4 54 - - 51,362 51,362 1.485 1.485 2a.l,5.24 20.1,5,24 Exlradlon Extrootioo Stcam St.xm 626 lOll 108 88 141 :141 341 - m 287 1,591 1.591 1,591 5,581 4,893 4,B93 - - 504,016 5(}.I,016 11,115 11,115
- !a.l,5.25 20.1.5.25 Ff'cdwnter Fovdwntcr 666 668 219 173 :t'l8 228 700 - 423 2,409 2,409 9,065 9,065 10,1133 lO,oa3 - - - 8:16,889 9!l6,989 12,138 12,taS 10.1.5.26 Fm>dwatcr 211.1.5.26 Pavdwator Iis0lvr Droine Tm)dnv Lyric 1,H36 1,(138 218 176 :.IU3 303 664 - ~
089 3,1186
- 1,666 3,_
3,666 12,026 12,0:28 9,536 9,536 - - - 1,028.074 1,0'.!8.074 28,824 28,824 2n.l.5.27 20.1.5.27 F('l'fiwnh'r Fc,dwatnrlinaivrMiae- 2i2 272 211 28 18 18 79 - 96 00 512 512 720 720 1,133 1,133 - - - 93.621 9;),621 4,674 04,674 23.1.5.28 2x.1.,5,28 Fllh'rod Fillerod Wah'TWator 56 1 5 5 90
!lO TLG Sem ites, lnc.
TLC SCM)ices. Inc.
ClintonPourer Clinton Station POWf!r Station Document El6-1640~006. Document EI6-I640- Rev. 60 606, Rev. Decommissioning Coat Decnrnmiasioning AllalysiH Cost Analyst. Appendix Appendix C, C. Page Page 55 of of II J1 Table CC Table Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station DEC ON Decommissioning DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate Estimate (thousands (thousands of of 2012 dol1ars) dollars) Off-S to orr-Site LLRW LLRW NRC NRC Spent Spent Fuel Fuel Site Site Processed Processed Borinl Burial V 1 men Volumf'l:l Burial Duriull I Utility Utility and and IA Activity t vily Decou Decnu Removal Removal Packaging Packaging TrAm"port Tronaport ProcessIng Prot slog Disposal Disposal Other Other Total Total Total Total Lt. Term. Lie. Term. Management Management Reatoratlon Restoration Volume Volume las, AA CIMS Cl-ClalUl BB C lass CC Class G CC GTCC Pro Proooued d Craft Craft Contractor Contractor Indt>x ln9ez Activity Description Activity Description Cost Cost Cost Cast CCosts
..t. Costs Costs CCosts "t, Costs Co.. Costs Costs Contin Contingency Costs Cns,ts Costs Costs Costs Coat, Coats Costs Cu.
Cu. Feet Feet Co. Cu. Feet Feet C Cu.Feet Feet C Cu.
. Feet Feet Co.
Cu. Feet Feet Wt Wt.,Lb Lbs.._ Munh.urs MllIlboul'ii M.nhuurs Mlluhuurs 01.."1_1I ()fPlunt Nxp*.-., 2a.1.fl.:m IGunerator 2a.10 211.1.5.31 2a.L5.32 1:ydrogon 20.1.5.32 20.1.513 Hydrogen Sysh'm.'I' (continued) of Plant Syxtcnss Generatorllydnrgnn 2a.l.$.29 .,,,orator
*rolor Stator Ih~h 2..1.5.31 high Prexnurn Corn SllfllY LaundfY Egoip 2a..l.5.:J3 Laundry aontinned3 nydroi,'l~n Sent Stator Cooling f'n'$a>urt,! Core Eiluip && F1,,
Seal Oil DKllIng Sproy Jolf Drams Oil DroinnRW Rqlro<.::l'ss RW Roprorrox 35 35 20 20
- 127 327
- J:.!
32 268 268 722 31 7:! 0 0 2:l 22
.4 54 2.
20 1 1 1 6 78 78 4 54 54 5 215 215 60 611 163 10 10 163 6 9 95 95 5:1
- 12 9118 90H 47 47 51.
519 5a 5:1 32 32 IIOll 9(38 47 47 519 519
~oo U_
253 208
- 1,100 2,132 m
178
~_
3,075 890 10,263 1O,!W:I 8,443 8,44:1 630,388 300,388 7,225 7,225 135,602 135,602 5,657 49) 5ri} 5531
- N3 a4a 5,857 4,6821 4,682 2a.1.5.a~ lA'ak 20.1.5.34 2a.I.5.35 20.1.5. 35 larcn IWtl.'Ction lk Detection Local In$tnllllentPonoln ool Innt"=.t Pandll 52 5'2 6
22 1I 1I a 3 14 14 1I n 72 77 72 72 7 30 49 4,0511 4,050 9:13 9:13 119 119 2a.1.5.ao Ion 20.1.5.36 Low Ptt'SJlllrtlCoro Pn'oonro CornSprnySptllY rn 125 4a 43 :10 30 :19 30 1122
'22 77 77 4~
437 -&:17 437 1,544 1,544 1,749 1,749 162,1178 162,(J78 2,2iO 2,270 2n.l.1i37 MonhtneMachine Shop Shop Equip,"I'flt u o 11 66 a 23 , 225 9,119 9,119 216 216
= 225 20.1.5.37 Equipmrmt 13 0 4 23 23 -
211.1.5.:18 Machin 20.1.5.38 Mttchim*Shop Shop Ventilation Vlmlilatlon 277 6 II 11 67 67 8 - 84 84 4~ 453 453 453 665 22,665 121 121 115,071 115,071 4,251 4.251 2u. 1. 5.:l9 51010 20.1.5.38 2u.l.5AI) 51010 2a1.5.40 Main Stt'am MilinSteam Strom Slvflmrmintion lsolution Volvo Vuh'll 1,116 1,118 M 31 14', 141 2 113 113 1 178 178 1I 4.'. 438 6
- 447 447 10 10
~441 2,441 60 50 2,441 2,441 5.
.50 7,Oln 7,087 28 28 6,277 6,277 81 81 644,1123 644,023 5,723 5,723 19,541 19,fi41 515 515 2o.1.5.41 211.1.5..12 Make 20.1.5.42 Muku*up Dt*minefllhwr* RCA 2n.l.5Al Mnke-upDemineralirxr.RCA Mllkt~.Uil 3.5.43 Mah'lIl1 22a.1.5.43 2a. L5A~ Mies.
20.1.5.44 IlokeupCondensate Dt'lluneraiiu!r N op Denline..liorr Co-le. Storage MiS(', Building Drains Ntm*RCA Storage
-RCA 2M 255 2:34 355 n
19 32 32 4 19 19 9 62 62 14 14 86 86 7. 75 3S 35 118 118 33 455 269 625 a 22 405 405 625 625 269 269 22 22 2,-174 2,474 576 576 1,223 1,2'2;' 100,400 100,485 92,952 92,952 4,(501 4,()6(; 4,440 4,4-10 5,964 5,gew 372
- 172
~liiICdlnllt!Outi V 2a.1.5 45 Mixrcllaneoun 20.1.5.45 t 'nli18tlOll Ventilation 35 - - 5 a 41 41 41 688 2n.l.5.46 Nocleer 20.1.5-46 Nucivnr OoilerIkdler 0 R 21 1 1 0o 4 7 ~
34 34 34 18 18 51 51 3,604 a,604 378 378 2a 15Ai Oil 20.1-5.47 OilTrllnsfer Transfer 115 115 4 9 61 61 - 40 40 229 229 229 2,442 2,442 99,182 99,182 3,945 1,!145 m 90.1.5.48 RClldor Cow 211.1.5.48 Rro,'tnr 2a.1.5.49 Refrigrrolon 20.1.5.49 1%OIlitioo Galling Con, lvarlotion Refrif,!erall.on Pildng PilHng Coullng 279 a 22 - 2tl 26 21 21 46 46 71 71 - 100 100 3
~
548 35 25 543 543
- :!5 1,8t5 1,815 1,039 1,030 131,581 tal,581 4,901 4,9m 4:35 4:15 2a.15.50 Snnitory 20.15.5))
211.1.551 20-1.5 Sanitary Scfl'1!!l1 Ilousr 51 Sttaan Hoth":' & MU MU Pump (louse Ventilation P\Ill\ll 110404 Ventilation 16'9
~
36 25 25 fi5 195 42 195 95 42 42
- 3,2(1'2 a,20'l 751 751 2a.1.552. Standby 1040,d 20.1.5.52 Liqtud Control Control 35
- 15 1 2 II 11 II 11 ~
58 58 58 417 417 16,953 16,!J53 569 fi69 2n.1.5.53 SwilchKcar 20.1.5.53 Swit('hg"f\f heal Rt~m\lval Hl'IllRelrurvsl ~
- 2 - 3 35 25 - 25 25 4_M 426 2n.1.5.54 Turbine Building 20.1.5.54 7tiddn, Bonding Closed Gsding Wntnr CIO$('d ('oollng Willer 254 3 8 54 54 60 60 ~
329 :1:.m 319 2,149 2,149 87,291 87,291 3,298 a,298
- la.l.5J;5 20.1.5.55 Turbine Ehrl E1I'('lrohydrtlulir.
mhydrmdio Control Control II 0o 0o - 3 17 17 84 3,425 3,425 189 Hi!.1 20.. La.flU 20.1.5 2a.1.5.57 Tud,ine Turb!nt) Oon
,50 Turhinv Turbine Oland Gen MillC Gland So.l Drnin... && Vonvo Mix Drnlno Seal Steam Sh'arn Vlmls 11 76 55 3 2
4 II 11 - 23 23 m 17 123 17 123 123 "' 152 152 161) 16a 15,482 15,482 586,794 1,2)01 1,21)0 717!0) 25.1.5.57 2a.l.5.58 20.1.5 Turbine Oil
.58 Torhine 441
.4 64 '"
65 8 71 8 269 269 22 22 164 164 2:1 23 - 209 209 27 27 1,219 1,219 m 152 1,219 1,219 152 152 10,670 10,610 866 H66 2,35:1 2,35:1 330 330 566,794 53,846 5a,8411 7,790 1,157 1,157 tn 1.5.59 Turbine (inn 2..1.5.50 (lcn AnxAux & &M6, Mi~ O<lVICO';! 0,-- 290 1M2 182 160 1611 287 287 501
'91 :JOO 306 1,816 1,816 1,816 1,816 11,408 11,408 8,487 8,487 944,575
!J44,075 5,509 5,ft69 2n.1.5
- 2. .1.5 Totals 479 17,086 17,086 2,435 2,435 2,070 2,070 4,462 4,462 7,142 7,142 7,414 7,414 n_
- 41. 088 39,869 39,889 1,218 1,218 177,229 177,2:!9 192,579 102,579 13,84,050 1:1,004:,050 101.5,455 30.'),455
- la.l.6 20.1.6 NaIToiding In i<Uilporl of dl~'ommi$ltomng Scotoldinginxopportofdorommisxloning 3,749 3,749 68 16 16 8" 83 22 22 964 004 4,902 4,90'1 4,902 4,90'.1 2,969 2,969 314 a14 151,:389 ISl,aM9 71,290 71,290 2n.l 20.1 Subtmal Suh)Mol Penlm Prnml 2n 2n Activity 0060110 Cmlh!
Contx l,(J6(i 1.006 :l1.568 37,569 IH,608 18,608 6,:120 6,320 6,413 6,4t:l 36,930 727 :18,393 a8,393 146,025 146,O'15 144,807 144,807 1,218 1,218 246,871 246,871 1:11,391 131,391 11,430
,430 1,320 1,320 - 18,660,690 18,660,690 533,311) 5:J::I,:110 3,5233 a,fi:W P--1202aAdditional Penod Additional (Into C~l ...hI 211 2.2.1 29,464 2.1 Di>l-~:>!\I'l D,np0u11 of of Slun'il Stored Turbine Holm ...
Torhine Rotors 21 27 246 10:1 103 822 812 - - 171) 170 1.368 l,a68 1,:168 1,360 29,464 - - - - 1,325,883) 1,:J25,1lliI) 46s
*HlH 2u.2
- 2. .2 Sublotal SnblAnl P,niod PeriodOn 21t Additional AdditionalConteCrn.tls 27 246 103 8'l2 822 - - 170 170 1,368 1,368 1,:168 1,368 29,464 29,464 - - 1,325,680 1,325,!i80 469 469 PI'nod P. m.1 211 :ill CoJlaterol
(,filar ,..1 CU!.<h! I'.* A. 1 :!n,;l
- la.3.:! d'::~:::::::::::~ .000.1 d(
ter wnxle 90x11 00x3,, 144 6:! 62 20
- /56 256 106 -
aoa 303 182 19'1 192 64 957 37:1 373 957 373 37:1 - 90a 8(13 aoo
;166
- 54, 209 54,209 32,629
- 12,629 176 176 57 57
- la.:l:1 20.:3.:)
2a 1 3.4 S,n0310001 olinwnnro Sv. of Fuel Capital 2 nd Tranxfer
- 514 - - - - -
22,595 22,585 77
- 1,:1&9
- 3,388 591 25,984 532 632
- 25,984 25,984 5'
59 . 1452n.3 20.3 Subtoml Perval 2. Cnllou
- rnl Conti 145 514 82 :162 362 - 485 22,595 22,596 3,72:1 3,723 21,906 27,906 1,862 1,862 25,984 25,9074 5.
50 1,210 1,210 86,8138 86,8:-18 233 233 Period Prnod 20 2a Perlo<!.Dcp.md"nl Prnod.Drinndrnt Como 211 .... 1 20.4.1 Dt.'u:m .mpplies Dunn xnppliea .5 95 - 24 118 11M 118 118
- 20. .... 2 t.1.2 In"urnnt'e Inn nm, 2,(1'):1 2,0,53 205 2205 2,258 2,258 2a .... :1 4,:1 Propl.'fiy Properly 10000 laxell 16,141 1,614 17,755 17,755 15,980 15.980 1,776 1,776 21l"'.4 2x.4.4 Health ph)'>!I!;!> n0pplirn Ilonlth phy600 !lupphcs 2,111'19 2,1189 - - - 747 3,737 3,737 3,737 3,737 211.4.5 2..4.5 III'lIvy t1'lUil'nwnt nmt H000y equipment rvnlol..d a,428 3,428 - - 514 3,94a 3,943 a,943 3,943 2nA.6 20.4.6 2aA.7 20.4.7 Di>!pooal Plant onrrgy ofDAW gvn~'rnh'(l DinpnnelofDAWgonerated cnel1;Y budget hodgrl 194 :17 552 562 -
4,871 163 7:11 731
!147 1147 5,601 947
.47 5,601 5,601 9,452 9,452 - - 189,048 189,048 :IOll 20.4.8 2n.4.8 NRC NRC Ft,llS Fcm 1,117 112 112 1,2i9 1,229 1,2i9 1,229 -
2n.4,9 211,4.9 Emergency Planning Planning Fvc Feco.. :I,5U7 3,507 351 3,857
- Ui57 8,857 3,8.'i7
- lnA.HI 20.4.10 Sill' SiloO&M (\mtll O&M Coats 582 M7 87 669 669 669 669 2n..l,11 20.4.11 Spent Spent Fuel Pod O&~I Foot Pool O&M I,4112 1,-t12 215 1,647 1,647 1,Ii47 2nA.12 9004.12 ISFBI 1tiFS1Op':'raling Opernhng COlltl! G.xtn I08 Hili 25 2S 194 194 1.4 21t .1.1 a
-2..4.13 Secunty Sorority Staff Slol ConlC{f:jl 11,158 11,168 I,fi74 1,674 12,8:1'.1 12,832 12,H..12 12,832 24:3,241 2-1:1.2-11 2aA.14 200.14 DOC DOC StaffCO>It Stag Coot 25,711 05,711 3,857 29,i)fl8 25,5138 29,568 292,274 292,274 TLG TLG Sen.jccs, Services, Inc. In,,.
CHilton Power Clinton P.trxr StationSlat;oll Document Documetlt 0116-1640-606,
£16-1640-006, Her. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Coat Decommiaaioning Cost Analysis Allal.vsis AppendixC.
Appendix Page 660111 C. Page of 11 TableC Table C Clinton Power Clinton Power StationStution DECON Decommissioning DECON Decommissioning Cost Cost Estimate Estimate (thousands (thousandsof of2012 2012 dollars) dollars)
-oft~Site OFF Stte LLkW LLRW NRC NRC Spent Spent Fuel Fuel Site Site Processed Proee5Sed Burial Voluntea BuriafVolunws Burial Burial /I Utility and Utilityund Activity Activity Df'con Dec.. Removal Removal Packaging Packaging Tran8pon Trannpnrt Processing Proc sing DispOStlI Disposal Other Other Total Total Total Total Lic.
Lie. Terns. Term. Management Management Reatnratian Restoration Volume Volume Cl-Cill$sAA Cl-Clll&5BB CI~~ Cl... C GTCC Processed ProcelJ8ed Craft Croft Contractor Contractor hul(')I. emlrx Activity Drxcripuno Activity Drscription Cost Cost Cost Cost Cor.u Costa Cosu Costa Costs C to Cmllta C.sta Costa Cotta Continuene Contingency Costa Costs Coats Costa Cotta Costs Costs Costs Cu. Cu. Feet Feet Cu. Cu. Feet Feet Cu. Cu. Feet Feet Cu. Cu. Feet Feet Co. Cu. Feet Feet Wt, Wt., Lbs. Lba. Manhnurs Manhours Manhonrs Manhonrs Period 2, Period Pefu;xi.Dl'l)(!nlh-nt 2iI P,-,d .Drizrndrnt Costa CQliih:l (ronlimwdl (rontimm,^d) 544,169 544.tH!I
-22a ...1.15 A5 UtilityStuITCmI(
Utility Stnt Cao 4a,9.14 43,&34 6,590 6,590 50,524 50,524 50,524 5(1,524 2aA 2a.4 Subtotal Period Subtotal Period 2a 2a Period-Dependant PeriOd.Dt-l>tmdcllt C CAlSls to 95 95 6,418 6,418 19-1 194 :J7 37 552 110,675 110,675 16,909 16,1819 134,879 134,879 127,406 127,4116 5,698 5,C198 1,716 1,776 9,-1.,)2 9,452 189,1148 U!9,t148 aog 308 1,079,684 I,079,6H4 2a1) 211.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2a COST 211 COST 1,:W5 1,305 44,527 44,527 19,1:10 10,130 6,822 6,822 7,2;)5 7,235 :l7,9m! 37,068 1:13,997 133,997 59,194 59,194 :110,178 310,178 275,443 275,443 31,6H2 31,682 :1,053
- 1,053 270,3:)5 276,385 142,05:1 142,05:1 11,<l:1tl
,410 1,:120 1,320 20,262,450 20,262,450 534,320 5:14,:120 1,0113,204 1,osa,204 PERIOD 2b*
PERIOD 26 - Site Site Decontamination Decontamination Period 21, Period :!b Direct Ik...~ommi.\{)ning Dil'"t'l:t Dc mmixnioning ActivitiesAdivitk'>l Di"poAAI of Dintoosl of Plant Plant Systems Hysh;lllS 2442b.I . I.1 26.1.1.1
- .':b.l.l.2
('ompommtCooilngWah!r Comiwnant C<<+ling Wninr-RCA r:ontainment },IollllonDg RCA 244 72 4 9 61 61 - 72 72 2. 3"" 389 to:l ' 389 103 103 2,412 2,412 101 75 76 97,965 97,96.') 8,389 B,3ll9 1,955
.1.955 1,281 1,281 72 26.1.1.2 Containment Alonitnnng 2 1 3 5 - 20 108 101 -
2b . l.l.:1 26.1.3 3 Control Rod Content Rod Drive 526 :19
- 0 27 35 35 111 111 172 172 009 909 909 fJ09 J,:l77 1,377 1,585 1,58S - - - 145,976 145,976 9.1)9:1 9,093 2b.l.1 A 26.1.1.4 Dit,*C1 Fu^1 Dl."'1 Fuel OilOil 67 - - - 10 10 77 77 - 77 77 - - - - - 1,276 1,276 1182b 1.1.5 26_1.1.5 Dil,,,dOt:'fH'ml De= ' I t. u. ml 59 - - 9 os 68 08 - - - - - 1,1:10 1,150 2h 1 1,6 Ili.., Dwwl . Genprnlnr Room Vunlilalion Vt-ntilslion 1,848 1,848 26-1.1,6 2b.l.l.7 Drains-I_,^mdry 26.1.1.7 l f^ i,. rotor R<<n, Drain1>.Laundry 10 to Radwl)><te Radoe.le ""
88 22 22 _ 1 1
- - 1:1 13 7
101 101 38 3B 36 38 101 101 36 36 1m 66 5,199 5,199 370 370
- ,!h.t.l.tI 2b-11.8 Ehdneal* Clean Non*HCA Non'IICA 1,735 1,735 - - - - 260 21)0 1.995 1,995 - 1,995 1,995 - - - - 33.545
- 1:1,545 2b.I.I.9 261.1.9 Ell'Clrical* ClllllnRCA F.l,'eAlllean RCA 7,6:!1 7,621 Ita 113 :no 270 1,884 1,884 - - 2,240 2,240 12,127 12,127 12,127 12,127 74,!:B4 74,814 - - - - 31038,244 a,naB,2",4 120,569 1:Mi,569
- lb.l 7,348 Lb.t.l.l0. 1.l0 Eq P..quip uip Dmm Radwll"teRepro tl mm Rado,aotr Rt'pron'>I>Img cooing 1,517 1,517 l:l2 122 94 W 185 185 3a8 338 - 518 518 2,774 2.774 2,774 2,774 7,348 4,917 4,1117 - 573,2/)3 573,204 2(1,185 26,185 2b . l.1.11 Ptro 26.1.1.17
- lb.l.l.l2 26.1.1.12 Pbntr Fu'c Prott.'1"tion Protavtion Non-RCA Floor Dmin Non .. RCA Radwal'te Repeucaoaing Drain Radneaxto Rt'procM>\l:iUlg
"'2 182
!KI:I 933 08 77 77 141 141 28;)
283
- a46 27 27 3`16 210 210 1,B78 1,678 1,878 1,678 210 210 -
5,587 5,587 4,102 4,102 -
- - 456,741 450,741
- 3,565 3,585 16,177 16,171 2b,I.I.I:1 IIVAC nVAt:* AtuiliarYAu~iliary Building BUIlding 44 la 7:1 540 112 - - - 25,419 664 2b,1.1.1:1 21>.1..1.14 IIVAC 26.7.1-14 nVAC. . Control ControlRoom Rtwm - 282 37 2 3 14 13 42 42 73
- 124
- 124 73 73
- 124
- 1:.':4 640 112 25,439
- 5,842 664 5,842 5,998 393:tb.LI.IS 21 1.1.15 IIVAC 21,1.1.tti 2h.1.1.17 26.1.1 nVAC*- Fuel 2b.1.!.!I; IIVAC-Ininrotnry nVAC.l.aooralory nVAC*- OR
.17 RVAC Put'! Building OfTOn>l Gen Building 3tKi fl31 631 167 167 It, 10 10 9
I ** 2.I. 16 26 10 10 152 152 95 95 3ll 38 1:1 13 21 21 23 23 119 191 191 56 56 645 645 11,0ilo
,036 304 304 645 645 l,naG 1,030 304
- 1114
- 3,783 3,7~3 6,038 6,038 1,510 1,510 182 IB2
- 307 a07 126
- !:.l6 163,9161 16a,9Hi 262,576 262,576 79,883 79,883 5,998 9,743 9,743 2,791
- '.,791 896:!h.l.l.18 IIVAC 91+.1.1.18 nVAC*- Radn,oxteRadwRl'h! Building 8... 27 43 2.14 2,34 46 46 2l!()
2861 1,524 1,524 1,524 1,524 9,277 9,277 661 661 - - 414,217 414,217 13,9161 1:1,900 M 1,266 2b.l.I.19 IIVAC 26,1.1.19 2b.I.1.20 IIVAC 26.1.1.21) IIVAC*S{'rvit'eDuilding
- Service Building IIVAC-- Turbine Duildint::
Turbine Building Cra01m & 736 66 7:Jtl 18 18
- 12 82 ,.7 187 2.
25 10 10 2'.&5 215 74 74 1,223 1,223 1,223 1,223 74 74 - 7,422 7,422 359
- 1fi9
- 321,762 321,762 1,266 11,269 11,2WJ 2b.I.1.21 Iioiata 26.1.1.87 Hoists Cramre & ml!\'atohl Elevnlorn 6 ri - 1I 77 - 7 123 12:1 Instrument At, 26.1.1.22 Inatrumunt Au -. RCARCA 556 566 4 10 10 71.
72 - 152 152 795 795 795 795 2,875 2,875 - - - 116,761 116,i61 8,528 H,5ts Instnllll",ntAir 26.1.1.28 Inntn,mant AirNon-RCA Non* RCA 22 - - - - - 33 25 25 - 25 25 - - - - - 429 4:l9 a8 7. 4,032 184 211.1.1.24 OROan x6.1,724 2b.I.I.Ui th. 26.1.1.2(1 OITGa>1-26.1. t. x5 Plant&'rviftlWawr* PlnntSrnin+ Water-RC:1 t.l.:.Ui Planl Serviw Wnler Plant Soevio, Water Non-RCA HC*\ Non*RCA 2:l7 237 2aS 2:18 1... 17 17 5 " 14 11 38 78 - 41 41
- 79 73 2.
28 426 426 405 212 426 426 405 406
- 212 1,521 1,521 3,090 3,090 591 591 05,329 95,:129 126,49:1 125,49::1 4,0:.12 a,HS-I 3,884 3,643
- 1,64:1 2782b.l.l.27 26.1.1.27 PFlXf:'$SProem Rmliation Monitonng Radiation Atonilnnng JaB 138 8 4 7 17 - 41 215 215 278 242 242 - - 25,1198 25,09:1 2,2115 2,295 Zh.l.1.28 26,1.1.28 Reoctor 21>.1.1.29 x6.1.1.29 RI)octor Reactor Watt'r Rocirculation RracterRorimulatinn Cloon-up Water Clean-up 295
- !4 24 300 67 39)1 41 8
ao 30 6 an 30 4 127 27
- 3B 38 2!10 290 174 1,2(rl 1,2112 174 174 1,202 1,202 14" 149 1,174 1,174 381 a81 1l,till4
,824 27,659 27,6&9 156,981) 150,000 1,576 1,576 9,432 9,432 2h.1.1.30 ROI:l.iduallk'tit 26.1.1.30 Rasid+nl heat Removal Removal 618 706 7116 1711 176 125 166 fiOB 508 - 674 2,974 2,974 2,974 6,580 6,580 7,268 7,268 - - - 680,643 6&1,04:1 15,173 15,173 26.1.1.31 ScrmmWnsh 26.1.1.3'2 Servke Scmm. Wash Srroico Air* RCA At, - RCA 325 77 4 9 64 - 93 1I 496 0 -
496 9 2,553 2,553
- - - - 103,1160 lO:l,fi66 146 5,156 146 5,150 2h.l.I,33 26.1,1.33 ServictJ Seri-, Air AirNonNon*RCA RCA 17 - - - - - 3 I.
19 - 19 19 - - - - - a:m 329 2b.1.1.~14 26.1,1.34 Shut m Service, Shuldown Water- RCA Servl......l Water RCA 125 2 5 3. 38 - - 38 2011 200 2011 200 1,565 1,505 - - - 61 ,135 61,135 2,(Y~5 2,0'15 21+.1.1.35 2h.l.1.:JS Shutdown Service Sen'l('e Water Wah-r NunFICA Non*RCA 119 Ito - - - - - 16 18 136 136 - 136 la6 - - - - `2,328 2,:1:.18 26.1.1.36 2h.1.I.:16 Solid Rndwasl\J Ralid R('pJ1.lCl~""lng &&Dill-POSHI Rode..tie Repmcv=.=e,ng Ditgaeud 52:1 523 751 6{) 60 47 94 165 - 517 2,156 2,156 2,166 :1,748
- 1,748 2,:ma 20)3 - 286,1511 286,150 21,627 21,027 26.1.1.37 211.1..1.37 Zh.l.l.38 21, 1.1.38 nupl Standby GAS, Treatment SuppressIOn Pool Treatment Prattr:loonupwasp & TrAnsfer Tranttor 146 14" 86 19 2
13 It3 13 16 5 64 25 66 134 134 3W 304 134 134 304 311 517 517 6ao 630 771 6fi 66 771 -
`24 ,74(1 24,740 69,389 69.:189 1,458 l,4lhl 2,544 2,544 2b.1.1.:m 26.1.1 39 Hllppnwmon Supt Pool I'.. 'I MllktHll' I' tka.ui 64 14 12 19 4.
45 - aa 33 188 188 188 188 747 747 652 652 - - - 67,245 67,245 1,156 1,156 2h . 1..1AO 26.1.1 411 TumTut), u.:OG:1W RW Caul Cnltl&& DO on Bldg nhlg Equip FAlUl!, Denton DrainS 8114 - 67,083 4,7.11 26.1141 211.1 26,1.1 2b.1.1
. 1.41 Tum Tutb OG Tote, Totals OG RW RW Cnlel Cnltt & & DO Bldg FlourFloor Drams Drains I,liiO 1,4)9)
- .':H6 286 421 21,166 .79 879 2:1 23 311 36 938 14 26 3,732 12 54 2,015 60
.3 93 93 144 7,030 487 467 775 775 37,221 487 467 77.
775 33,962 3,259 3,259 464 2,153 2,153 148,229 148,229 864 1,349 1,349 29,044 29,044 67,963 762,948 162.948 7,9.58,084 7,6-IJ8,0B4 4,790 77,273 373,854 273
- 173,8.')4 2b.t.2 26,1.2 Seaffohimg SaRoldtng m in !!-u!,port support d ofdecommissioning dt~OUlml!Ulionjllg 4,f)t\6 4,686 M 85 20 104 27 - 1,205 6,128 6,128 6,128 3,711 3,711 393
- 193 189,236 189,236 89,113 89,11:1 Dt~'Onlllnllnatton Drronn.ninat ion of 01 Sile Site Buildin!P' Buildings 2b.l.:l.l 26.1:1.1 Rt'octor Reactor DuildmgBuilding a,zgo 3,2811 4,147 766 629 195 2,3O-i 2,304 3,453 3,45:1 14.774 14,774 14,774 14,774 7,734 7,7:14 35,5,53
- 1S,5..,):I - - - 2,661 2,661,n:m,1121) 127,854 1:!7,tlfi-I 2b.1.:t2 16.1 :i.i Au.uliary Auxtliory BuildingDudding .197 220 42 SO 1,143 217,924 10,195 1,171
- lb.l,:t::J 2b .1,3,3 2b.l.3.-1 Control Control Building Die:wl Diewtt Gcrwrntor Buildwg 397 458 1;)3 164 4:1 4:1 43 50 50 '"
29 1 1117 113
- Ill7 297 310 sa 1,14:1 1,143 1,140 1,140 1140 1,171 56 66 1,116'8 196 8 2,074 2,074 217,924 184,549 184,549 49,962 10,195 10,270 10,270 2,913 26,1.3.4 Grncretor Building 133 41 12 14 - 31 88 321 321 321 - 568 66B - 49,962 2,!11:J 2b.l.:1.5
`16.1.3.5 Radwilsltl Radenanu,nuilding Building 1,55."1 1,555 6thl 661 156 184 27 4181 4011 1,090 I,09() 4,074 4,074 4,074 4.074 1,067 1,067 7,510 7,510 - - - 701,180 70l,ISO :m,;m.1 36,:193 2b.
2b.1.3CUiIi TurbineTurbine BuddingBuilding 1,:100 1,390 681 143 170 b1l 6'9 36. 369 - 1,{)10 1,010 3,842 3,842 2,736 2,7:15 6,765 6,765 - - - 699,593 6Ug,SUa :1,351
- l4,:l5t 2b.l.;)
2b.t.3 Totals 7,2t:J 7,213 5,919 1,161 1,097 a21 321 3,334 - 6,249 6,240 25,294 25,294 12,763 12,763 54,427 54,427 - - - 4, 515,127 4,515,127 221,976 221,f)76 TLG TLC Services. Services, Illc. Inc.
Clinton Power Poner Station Document El Document l:.'1fi...1640~O(}6, 6-1640-006, Neu. Rell. 0() Decommissioning Decontmiasioning Cost Coat Analysis Appendix C, Appendix C, Page Page 7 7 of of 11 it Table C Table C Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station DEC ON Decommissioning DECON Decommissioning Cost Cost Estimate Estimate (thousands (tbousands of of 2012 20}2 dollars) OIr-:site Off-Si t L NN'kC C spenfF'uel Spent act Site Presented ProcM&ed IIurial Burhal VMunren Volumes - Burial lI
- Bartat Utility and Utilityund Activity Decou Deean Removal R oval Packaging Pa kaging Transport Tra port Processing Pro as g Disposal Dispoaal Other Tatai Total Total Lie. Term.
Term Management Restoration Volume Volume Clil&sA Cl... A Class C t.. B n ClaM CC Class CTCC GTCC Processed Pmceued Craft Craft Contractor Contractor Indf'x Artivity Activity Df'lu'rlption Deeseipt!nn Cost C~t Cost Cat C ate {'oats Cate Costs C to Costs Costs C.- Costa Costs C ntinge y_ -_- Costa Continttcnc CM'" Canto Coats Cnxta COl>U CUlits Costa Cu. Feet Cu.F_t Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Feet Cu. Feet Feet Wt., Wt ** Lbe. Lbs. Manhoura Manhours Manboure Manhouno
- lb.}
2b.1 Subtotal Su6totolI'lwiod P' al 2b Activity Cw>ls
- lb Activity C is 8,67:1 8,637:3 31,771 2,125 2,125 2,065 2,055 4,151 4,157 5,31i 5,377 14,485 68,643 6!i,:l84
&5,:184 3,259 3,259 164,70a 164,703 BJ,863 83,863 12,362,450 12,362,450 r>84,94:1 684,943 Pori<<f 2% Collotersl C 2b.3.1 Pr.-^ <21, g water wnnU, 1711 170 7!l 79 325 825 :!86
- 186 - 24:1 243 1,211 1,211 1,211 1,150 1,150 fiH,!l96 1)8,1106 224 224 2b.:I.2 26.02 Pt,'. .I.,.
Procl'H$ oc"OJmmis.;;iomng
...rig rhemirni q ush wools ch.'mll:lll nu:ili WUrlll' 5 - 142 747 1,286 - 450 4110 2,a.:10 2,63311 2,6:10 2,630 2.159 2,159 2aO,11:)
2:!0,113 41J.1 404
- lb.:!.a 26.3 3 Small 1001 aliowancOJ all tool., - 027 627 - 94 721 721 2b aA 26.3.4 Spt~nl SI-t FUtll Fmd Capital I" Rod Tranltfl'r its) and Trnnsk,r - - 27,11-1 27,114 4,007 4,057 31,181 31,181 - al,lBl 31,181 2h.:I 26.3 Subtotol Subtotal PoiPI)noo 2b 2b CoUah~ral Cilaternl C CO>lI",
wts 184 627 220 1,07:1 1,078 1,672 27,114 27, 114 4,HM 4,854 :15,744 44,563
,561' :11,181
- 11,181 a,:l09 3,:1)9 29!1,110 209,110 628 Pe6,x121, Peri<<bD.pmdenl C- W 2,91:1 2,91:1 2h 4.2 26.4.1
,11 4.3 D<<vm nopplioa 1.-
Properly loon, 2,330 2,a:m 1.117 1,117 5,101 563 112 112 510 518 2,913 1,228 5,611 2,913 1.228 1.228 5,611 26.4 .4 tlvnllh ,hyxics x0PPOes a,7:11 11.1.1 1133 4,664 4, 664 4,664 26.4.5 Ba+tvy egnipmcnt nmmi a,97'l 5!16 506 44,561
,567 4,567 26.4.6 Disµewluf DAWln,nernt,d ::126 226 -Ia 43 - 642 190 1,101 1,1111 1,101 1,1111 lIJ,99ti 10,998 219,910 219,910 a59 26.4.7 Plant energy bodgal 4,50:!
4,502 675 5,178 5,178 5,178 26.4 8 NRCFL~'$ NRC F,- 1,a08 1,868 1:11 181 1,439 1,4:19 1,439 2b.4 '
- lbA.9 Emergnt y Planning Fees Enwrgtlncy F.'cs 4,lIl6 4,1116 4Il 411 4,617 4,517 - 4,517 26.4.10 2li.*UO O&MC(IoIts Site O&M Cts run 681 102 71<1 783 783 793 2h*Ul 211.4.11 Sit'. Fuel Spellt Spent Fuel Pool Pod 0&'"
0&M 1,671 1,677 252 1,9'18 1,020 - I,'928 1,9'lB
- lhA.l:.!.
II, 4.1_2 Redwosw Prwl'#>ling Liquid RadWR>llt' Prosenoit ElIUllmwIlIltiOJfVlt"CII 426 436 64 490 400 499 2bA.1:1 26.4.13 ISFHI OpOJrnting Coots ISFSI Operating Cw>ta lil7 1117 ao 30 227 2'l7 227 2h.*'-1-1 26.4.14 NJCunly StafT('AMt Snoonty 81111Caat la,oa.')5 13,1)6 1,!.I6O 1,980 15,024 15,024 15.524 284,66 2b..&.15 26.4.15 DOCStuITCru>t DOC SIof Coat 28,965 28,955 4,34a 4,343 :13,298 33,298 33,298 33,298 326,709 2b.*I.Hi 2b.4.16 Utility SlJlffCtMt Utility 5050 Coot 49,282 7,392 7,302 56,674 56,674 610,1:37 26.4
- Ib..& Subtotal Sublata) Pcritxl2b Period 2hPI!nOO* Dt'p'!ndcnt CostOl Periud-Dependent G,- 2,:1;10 2,330 7,70"1 7,701 226 43 - 1i4:!
1142 110,416 18,281 139,641 139,841 132,911l 130.070 6,672 6,072 - - 10,996 10,1016 219,lllll 21'9,9111 :JMI 1,22:1,651 1,_23,651
- lb,O 21, ,0 TOTAL PERIOD TOTAL PERIOD21, 2b COST 11,11n 11,187 -10,101 40,101 2,571 :1,171 3,171 4,151 4, 157 7,691 7.691 1:17,530 137,530 37,620 244,1l28 244,11'-28 2O'l,917 202,017 37,KSa 37,85:1 a,259 3,259 164,70:1 164,70:1 98,168 98,168 12,881,470 12,881 ,470 Hti5,9:YI 685,03(1 1.22:1.1i51 1,20:1,651 PERIOD2d*
PERIOD 2d -Derontaminution Deronmmiaatien Following Fallowing Wet wet Fuel Storage Period2d2dDlfl'<'t PCl'lod Di-t Dt'COlUmlMuming Activities Daxnmmissinning ActlvIIIC!:'I 211.1.1 2,1.1.1 Rcmovll spent fud Remove !:'Ipcnl radl.$ fuel racks 026 9:.!6 76 78 161 181 218 - 1,086 l,{lli6 - 696 1lO5 3,293 3,29.1 3,2943 15,5tU 15,584 - - 882,760 882,760 1,5:17 1,587 Disiwsal of Plant Systems 2.1 Gwtxmirml,d - 1,2-17 1.247 16 18 33 188 19M 25 354
- t54 1,876 1, 878 11,876
,876 - - 7,8f:i7 7,867 356 356 - - a:m,642
- 139,6341 21,:142 21,a-l2
- M~I.2.2 20.12 .2 Flw El' Proh'('lion*
Fin, Prot-lion
.1 - RCA 831 S:Il 14 33
- 13 2:11 1,358 1,358 9,172 a72,48-1 372,4 84 la,597 13,597 2d.l.2.:t 2d.1.2:t 211. J .2..1 28.1.2.4 Full!
Fuel llnndling & TraMf,', Pool Bundling Foal Pool Pool Coolmg Tronob,r
& Cleanup Caobng&Cloanup
- 1,IH4
- m 1,1114 30 "
I186 4
... 129 3
231 167 4 526 12 - 249 12 12 403 49:1 1,356 2,695 65 1,358 2,_ 2,895 85 65 9,172 174 174 6,629 6,629 1611 189 7,!H1 7,541
- 16,628 16,628 696,897 696,897 54:1 54:1 20,77!I 20,77!1 28.12 .6 2d.1.2.5
- M.L2.6 201.2.8 Funl Support Fut'!
HVAC* Support CootlUnment Duildlng IIVAC- Conminmunt0uilding 119 826 926 20 2U
.9 49 17 64 282 28
- !l!
Il7 117 66 - 55 317 304 354 1,755 1,755 304 1,755 1.755 l,WO 1.1(11 It,:.104 11,204 945 945 1,674 1,674
- 98,187 98,187 549,850 549,850 2,15:1
'2,151 1-1,882 14,892 2d.1.2.7 20.1.2.7 Powble Potob)o Water - 12 - - - - 2 14 14 14 14 - - - 2:18 2:10 20.7.20 211.1.2.8 20.12 2d.1.2 ProcaasSampling ProCt'!IS Tolaln Tolnis So-piing .,,"
602 5,051 aao 8311 40 4a 21
- 409
- l00 911 9Xl 6:n 831 6.
86 - 2135 205 7.687 1,SS1 1,066 1,0113 9,132 I,OfI6 1,006 9,118 74 37,037 891 691 a7,037 1,2'l8 1,220 11,912 17,972 1Il6,:J61 11)63,301 2,180,098 2,Uill,049 11,482 11,-IMt 8.5,(116 8.'1,1115 D<<nntaminntion nfeia, Dt"t'tlllhunmation of Slh' Buildings BUilding" 24.1,3,1 2& 20.1.3 2d.I.3 L:U FUt'l Fuol Duildmg TuwIn Totols Building 9,2 n/2 972 924 H:l4 924 48
.6 48 57 57 6Ii 65 6Ii 65 Uti IN 116 7.9 769 769 2,951 2,951 2,951 2,951 2,574 2,574 2,574 2,574 2,105 2,105 2,10.')
2,1&5 285,151) 285,159 285,159 285,159 32,714 32,714 32,714 32,714 2d.IA 2,1.4 Sosflold,ng in
&nffoJding suplwrt of d.>(~mnll>l"i(jning in "lIppurt inning - 937 9:J1 17 4 21 5 241 1,226 1,226 1,226 1,226 742 742 79 79 - - 37,847 37,847 17,82:1 17,823
- .ld.1 201 Subtotal Period 2d Sobbaal Perim! Activity C.-.:-
2d Activity C(fflV; 1,898 6,991 6,901 576 579 1,018 1,016 2,O:!9 2,039 - :1,502 16,603 16,603 16,5&1 16,588 - 14 14 40,:15-1 40,:154 29,679 29,679 - - 3,385,815 3,385,815 1:17,089 1:17,089 Purim! :M r"nod 2d Additional Addilonai CascoC-t);St"
- .ld.2.)
.12A License Torminntimt Survey [`loaning - - - 954 9,54 286 2S6 1,240 1,24) 1,2-10 1,240 6,2411 6,240 202
- .ld.:.! Subt,,m) Period 2d Addilinmd Coals - - 954 286 2l!6 1,240 1,240 1,240 6.240 6,2-10 Pcriad 2,1 PI'nod CRalornl Coma 211 CoHateml Cosis 2,1.:111 21i.a Pnx"\'"" d~>("(}mmi~ionmg water Prmnsx d,nnnmisaiontng Walt'f woxtu wal<lc 00 - 411 4(J 165 19.')
195 - 122 6,11 611 611 5S2 582 34,Hla 34,913 11:3 11:1
- !d :1 a 20.:1:1 Small Snmll tool tool Rllowanc.*
ollawonce - 140 1-10 - - - - - 21 161 161 1:11 28.:1.4 Dl'('Onllm~l(lJlIllg Dam00m000ming r"'llllllnwflt F luipmant DI"IlQ..-!ilIOIl Disix.. ilian l:lS 88 36 167 44 5. 56 444 444 6,008) 6,000 635 635 305,981 305,961 88 Il!l 303 &Ibintal Porkol Subtotal Pt.riod 2d Collalt'ral Culinteral Costs Cslo 91) 110 178 2113 167 239 - 1,216 1,216 34(1,875 140
"" 203 199 1,216 1,216 6,OnO 6,0)01 1,217 1,217 340,H76 202 20'2 TLG Seruicea, Inc.
TLC Services.
Clinton Peaoer Clinton Puwer StationStation DocumentE16-I640-006, Document EJ6-J640-IJIJ6. Rec. Rev. 00 Decommissioning Cost Decommiaaioning Cost Analysis Arlaiysis Appendix AppendixC, C. Page Page 88 of of II 1J Table CC Table Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station DECON Decommi6sioning DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate Estimate (thousands (thousandf' of of2012 2012 dollars) dollars)
'ff*Site Off-S"' LLRW LLRW NRC NRC Spent SpentFuel Fuel Site Site Processed ProceliMld Burial Volumes DuriulVoiuJllf'Jo Burial Buriull I Utility Utility andand Activity Decon Drrns Removal Removal Pw.ckaging Packaging Transport Transport PrOCCtPlng Process ing Disprnw.li Diap Other Other Total Total Total Total Lim Lie. Term.
Term. Management Management Restoration ReJltoration Volume Volume Class ClasaA A CI... ClassBB Class C CIItlUiC GTCC GTCC Processed Processed Craft Craft Contractor Contractor Indf'x Artivit" Drseription Aet:vity Uf'Hcril)tion Cfult Cost Cost Cost Costs Costa Costs Costa Cos'" C is Costs C... Costs Coats Continlenc~ Contingency Coats Cos" Coats Costs Costs COlits Costs Costs Cu. Cu. Feet Feet Cu. Cu. Feet Feet Cu. Cu. Feet Fret Cu.Cu. Feet Feet C Feet.. Cu. Feet Wt., Lb., Wt.,Lbs. Manhour Mllnhuufs Meuseurs MuuboUfS Period 2d Ponod 2dA.l 2d.A.l 2IU.:! 2' 4.2 2dA.3 2d.4.3
- MAA 2'.4.4
- ld Pcnod'~llimdcnt Period-Del-lo.
D('Wn suppli Demo 1--- lIuppliulI In.-Iurancu Pn>t~rly 151.01 Prupcrty tau'lli [:<'>>($ tIufllthllhys.iclIl:!UWilcl'l Ilomlth physics supptios 258 2511 8!X1 4:1M 438
&Ill 84(3
.65 65 44 85 85
- rla 223 a2a
- 123 481 481 931 931 1,116 1,116 32:1 32:1 481 481 931 931 1,116 1,116 22.4.5 Heavyvyl"qUipmenl Ilea equipmentrental mntd 1,557 2:t4 2:4 1,791 1,791 1,791 1,791 942 2'1 .4.6
- M.4.7 24.4.7 2'1 .4.8 24.4.9 2d.-t.1Il 24.4.10 DisllO><:lI of Dislxmnl Plant energy Plant NRCFl_
ofDAW Emcqwncy Plllnning Emergency Site O&M Sit,, O&MCUi!lta j:ll'nl'rall>lts ling Costs 11 77 12 12 89 89 8. 89 58,771(1 2dA.I:! 24.4.1:1 Sl'<:Urity Staff Security Cost StaffCoal 2,829 2,929 424 424 3,253 3,263 a,253 3,253 58,710 2d.4.14 2,.4.14 2dA.15 2d.A.15 DOCStnlTCmd DDC Stall Cast UtilitySlaffCA)st Utility Staff C" 7,814 7,814 14,155 14,155 1,172 1,172 2,123 2,123 8,988 16,278 16,278 B,_ 8,986 16,278 16,278 88,286 H8,2lifi 168,626 16t:1,1i26
- ldA 24.4 Subtotal Porio,l Subtotal Periml2d Pl'flod.DclJ';mdcllt 2d Period Cosls De:µmdnnt Costa 25M 258 2,450 2,450 00 90 17 17 256 256 29,741i 29,74(1 4,893 4,893 37,711 37,711 :16,851 35,861 1,860 1,860 -t,:l91 87,8211 87,S:!O 14:1 14:1 315,621
- 115,621 211.0 24.0 TOTAL PERIOD TOTAL PERIOD 2d 2d COST CO:-1' :!,:!46 2,246 9,5111 9,581 .44 844 798 799 1,185 1,185 2,5:15 2,535 30,700 311,7101 8,880 56,770 56,770 54,896 54,896 1,_
1.0110 14 14 46,554 46,:154 35,287 35,287 - - :1,814,510
- 1,814,510 137,434 1;17,4::14 321,8111
- 121,lml PERIOD if PERIOD 21-- Licellse Termination License Termination P,'nol 21Oin<'l D. otntsission,ng Adivitlt~
Ilomng Activities 211.1 ORISE o,ofrmakay tOf'Yl:!urvey survey 175 62 52 227 227 211.2 fllclict'fWU Tenninalelioensn 21.1 Subtotal Subtoal PanollPeriod 2f 2f Activity Activity Cons Costs 176 175 52 227 227 Porio,l :U P"rlod 2f Addltiooai Additional Costs Costs
- U2.1 21.2.1 I.ic,*fi>W LicenseTerminatIOn Termination SUf\
S" "Y 'y 13,7a::l 13,733 4.120 li,852 17,852 17,852 17,852 223,57:1 223,57:1 :1,1211
- I,I:W 2f.2 21.2 Subtotal Sub(olal PeriodPeriod 2f 2( Additional Additional CostsCO>lhl 13,7a:J 13,733 4,120 17,852 17,852 17,852 17,852 223,573 223,573 3,1211 a,12U PI'rlud Porosl 21:!f (,,,III1Ii'Tfll Collateral C{)sll~Costs 21.:1.1 DOC stall ndooMion esponwa 1,14311 1,OJU 154 154 1,184-1,184 1,184 1,184 21,3 Subtotal Poriad 21'Co11aleral Cools 1,030 154 1,184 1,184 1,184 Period 2f Peiissl.Dependent Cnata 21.4.1 Ira a~15
- 1e5 :19
- l9 424 424 2£.4.2 21.4,2 f'fopt'rtytIlXt'S Prnpr rly Issas 745 74 819 81!l 819 2f.4.:l 1,1124 21.4.3 11('Ullh Ilodth phynics ~lIpplil.lll llhYlliicssuppliers MIg 1119 - 205 1,024 1,024
- lrAA 27.4.4 Di.'lpOMi Dispossl ofDAWof DAW gtlnerah'ti gonernt,d 7 1 21l 20 6 a5
- 15 35
- \5 a51 7,1120 7,020 11 477irA.a 21.4.5 Plant Plant cneryy n
oergy hlldget budget 414 62 m m 477 2f.Hi 214.(3 NUCFI_ NRC Fe es 436 44 479 479 2f.4.7 21.4.7 Emcr)t,*wy Emergency PlanningPlanning Fees <<'.'t'll 1.417 1,417 142 1,559 - 1,51)9 7'559
- If,4,8 21.4,8 Sil~
Site O&M O&M CostaCosts 2:15 235 35 2iO 270 270 2f.4.9 21.4.9 ISFSI ISFSI0lwrlltmg O(-ling Casts Costs 68 to 10 7. 78 78 78 2f.4.10 2t.4.10 &'('unly Securely Staff Cost Staff Cost 2,+40 2,440 366 2,1ID5 2,805 2,805 2,800 5(1,514 50,514 2f.4.11 214.(1 DOC DOC SlaffC<.>>t Staff Carl 5,194 718 779 5,974 5,974 - - - - - 56,7:11
,'16,7:11 2f.4.12 214.12 Vhlity SI~ITCost Utility Staff Cost 7,251 1,_
1,1018 8.:139 8,:139 8,:939 8,:139 - - - - - 60,0413 HO,{Hfi 2fA 21.4 Subtmal Subl.al Pen7d Pcnod21' PI~n(.>t.l*Dl'p<'ru:I,'nt 21' Porool Cllst", Dafs,rulent Cants 819 810 7 1 - 20 18,585 18, 585 2,849 2.183 2'.U83 20,648 20,646 1,1137 1,637 - - 351
- 151 - 7,020 11 187,291 7,020 11 11'17,291
- U.O 20 TOTAL TOTAL PERIOD PERIOD 21' if COST COST 819 819 7 1 - 20 :l3,522
- 13,522 7,176 41,546 41.546 38,909 39,909 1,637 1,fi37 351
- 151 - - 7,020 7,020 22:1,595 22:1,5&'1 190,411 100,411 PERIOD PERIOD 22 TOTALS TOTALS J.l,7;m 11,730 H,,'i,028 162, 1128 :.12,552 22,552 10,79:1 10,79:1 12,577 12,577 48,214 3:15,750 335,75(1 112,871 112,871 652,523 573,105 57a,16/> 73,032 7:\,032 6,:126 0,326 487,391 487,391 275,859 275,859 1,430 l,-1aO 1,320 1,320 36,065,450
- W,965.450 1,581,269 1,581,269 2,819,129 2,811:1,129 PERIOD PERIOD 3b 31,- -Site SiteRestoration Restoration Ponod all Pllrlod 36 DII'1.!d DiroctDeI,'ommlMmning DecommissioningActiVIties Ad-1115 Donwlinon nfRl'llllliningSlit' Dcmolilu)fl of Renmining Site Buildings Ouildin!;,1'!
- lh.l.l.l
- 36.1.1.1 RcoctorBmld.mg Reactor Building 1i,7!H 5,791 - - - - 1l6.
869 0,659 ll,fl59 6,659 fl,659 - - 65,1011 11.."1,001 36.1.1.2 Auxiliary
- lh.\.1.2 Auxiliary Building Building <!,<!0'2 330 2,533 - 23,242 36.1.1.3 Cin:ulating ab.1.13
- lh.l.l.4 Circulating Water 36 .1.1,0 Contrul 1051701 Buildin" Wal~'r Srrnenhuusn Building St-fN'nhoulW 2,2172
- 1,61)9 8,8(19 5,265 5,265 Ml 541 790 790 2,5:13 2,5:13 4.1:01 4.150 6,Ol\4 6,054 2,53a 4,150 4,150 6.054 6,O!)4 - -
2:1,24::! 38,418
- l!:I,418 56,578 56,578 3b.U.S DiosciGt'Ocrnlof 36.1.1.5 DI\'$)I Oenemlor BuildingBuilding 1,858 1,858 - - - 279 278 2,1:16 2,1:16 2,1:16 2,1:16 - - - - - - 20,234
- W,234 TLG TLG Services.
Services, Inc. Inc.
ClintonPoorer Power StationStation Document Document616-1640.606, El6-16.JO.OU6.Het- Rev.0U Clinton Decommissioning Coat Decommissioning Cost Analysts AnaiysJIJI Appendix C Appendix Page 9 C. Page 9 0/11 of)) Table CC Table Clinton Power Clinton Power Station Station DECON Decommissioning DECON Decommissioning Cost Cost Estimate Estimate (thousands (thousandsof of2012 20}2 dollars) dollars) 01f.SIte-- off-sit. LL LLRW W NRC NRC Spent SpentFuel Fuel Site Site Processed Processed Burial Burha! Volumes Volumes BuNatl Burial I Utility Utilityandund Deeon Deeun Removal Rem 0val Packaging Portaging Trallsport Transport ProcNaing Processing Dililp0.8al Diaposni Other Other Total Total Total Total Lie.Term-Lie. Term. Management Management Restoration Rutoration Volume Volume Cl- A CIruJ5A CI-. B ClusB Class ClassCC tiTCC GTCC Peoroose.d P_d Craft Craft Contractor Contractor I Activity Activ ity Description Cost COlit Cosu Casu Costs c~" Costa cns. Continlenc~ Costs CWlt& Co.. Costa Coate Costs Costs C~ts Cu. Cu. Feet Feet Cu. Cu. Feet Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Feet Cu. Cu. Feet Feet Wt.. Wt ** Lbs. Lbl:i. Manhaurs Manhours Manhnurs Munhourli Index cant Coot casts enaw ctata casts Contingency Denmida+n oI Remaining Silo Duihliugs (mntinuod) aMO 67 437 437 437 437 5,1101 li,lOU 36.1.1.6 Mako.Up Walor Pump Ih,uoe 67 1,7H.') 268 268 2,053 2,063 2,053 2.05:1 21,227 21,227 3301.1.7 Miooollon -S.tyWorh 44,561 3b. .8 Mirelcllanauw 8100 0005 2,78:l 417 417 3,199 3,199 3,190 3,199 44,561 Jb.1.1.!1 Radso oolc Building 5,:H2 7g2 782 6,_ 6,994 5,994 5,994 58,4411 58,440 36.1,111
- lb.1.1.l0 Ib.l.l.lll Scrvio Buildmg St'fVlCC Building 40'1 411'1 60 60 462 462 462 462 5,.585 5,585
- lb.LI.l1I Tv+naloomoe 36.1.1.1 Trlln ..forlTltlrllndTllnk and Tank Pods Pads 17:1 17:1 26 26 199 199 100 19' 2,4113 2,4thl 36.1.1.12 Turbine Building 3b.l.1.12 Tudsino Building 5,:124 5,324 799 799 6,123 6,123 6,123 (i,123 63,415 63,415
- lb.1.1.1:1 Torbina 36.1.1.13 TurbinePr,h,olnl PI'&"&lal 1,223 1,223 184 184 1,41n 1,407 1,407 1,407 12,474 12,474
- th.U.I4 Fool 36.1.1.14 Pud BUilding Banding 2,442 2,442 366 366 2,808 2,13118 2,808 2,808 26,720 26,720 ah.l.I 36.1.1 Total\\.
Totals a8,447
- 18,447 5,767 5.767 44,215 44,216 44,215 44,215 443,457 44:1,457 Site Clomwul Silo CloA'Oul AchvltlC$
Arlivities
- lb.l.2 3b.i 2
- lh.1,;"1 RorkFill Grade &
Sih~ BackFill Situ
& land-i.`
landSl."oIw0,10 !lIte 109 1(10 2,154
- I" 16 323 323 12fi 125 2,477 2,477 -
125 125 2,477 2,477 201 201 4,449 4,449 36.1.3 Grade 2,154 aidA 330.1.4 Fillal relwrt Final rvport Is10 NEC NRC 195 195 2. 29 224 224 224 224 - aL.t Arh~'ily 448,106 36.1 &rMMUIPeriod Sublotal Poriod3b31, Cell$l!; Aki,,ily 0- 40,710 40,710 195 195 6,1:16 6,136 47,041 47,041 224 224 - 46,817 46,817 44t1,106 Pllnod :lh N-A31, AdditIOnalConte Additional ~t$ 31,.2.1 Cunrn.;tc Cru,.:hmg Conortdo Crushing 1,515 1,515 9 219 2'19 1,753 1,75:1 1,753 1,753 7,355 7,:15..; 3622 &r1'\lnhuww Sera mhausn Coffenillm Cam nlam 1,096 1,! 116 164 16, 1,260 1,260 1,2110 1,2110 10,159 10.159 614ab.:!.:! 3b. 2.3 Die A,atgeF1ulrn~ DUK:huI1l'l1 Thn'kfill Fl- Rackfill 4,096 4,0041 (i14 4,710 4,710 4,710 4,710 23,9:11 2:1,9:11 16.2.4 Unit 22 Eooavntion Unit E.\cavlltlon Bar:krill liackbll 1,a44 1,344 202 1,548 1,546 1,546 1,546 13,128 1:1,128 36.2 Subtotal Subtotal Period Frill 31,abAdditional AdditionalCost Costs 8,05t 8,051 9 1,209 1,299 9,269 9,269 9,269
- 54,57:1 54,57:1 Period :iil Period Collahrral C01!!ts 3b Collateral Coots
- ih.:l.l 31,3 1 ah Small Smalltool tadnlwwlll\<.'\t ally.. -e '48 448 67 515 515 36.5a Suhtotal Period ah Sobtmal Puriool Ccllnh'mlCoato lb Cdb+larai Cw;t.. 448 448 67 515 515 615 l°000.1 eb Pooioel Dulrondant 0-1,288 31,.4 .1 IWlunlnre Inoseaneu 1,171 117 1,288 1,288 1,288
;JbA.2
- 16.4,2 Prnp"rty Property tarestaM'>! 2,264 2,364 _226 16 2,491 2,491 2,491 36.4.3 Heavy tvluipmeni, rt'ntlll heavy l'<luipml'nt rental 5,95'J 5,959 - - - 1!lJ4 194 6,8fi.l 6,857 11,85:1 O,85a 3b-4.4 Plant energy badger Plant energy budgvt 6.10 630 95 9' 725 725 725
- lh.*U 3b.4.5 abA.6 NRC NEC ISFSIISFSIFl~'l'I Enwrgent"y Fr,, 544 54
'4 '99 589 599 599 330.4.8 PlanningFFe<<
6mcrgwxy PhmnlOl{ ...*" 4,309 431 4,740 4,740
- JhA.7
- 16.4.7 ISFSI O,mrlllmg ISFSI Olmra Crn<tll ling Coots 207 31 238 239 218 2:18 ah 4.8 36-4,8 Silt' O&M Costs Sit, O&M 0- 715 107 82'1 622 - 822 ab.*t9
- lb ,4.9 &'(:urity Soyorily Sod(StaffCoal CooIl 7,417 1,113 8,530 (0) 7,2.50 7,250 1,279 2153,5811 15:1.5tui abA.to 3" 4.10 DOC DOC S10RSlllrr('(l$t Cool 15,261 15,201 2,289 17,551 17,651 17,551 17,551 1311,674 1lJO,674
- 36.4.11 Utility Utility Staff Slab Cost Col 11,470 1,721 1:1,191 0 3,1134 a,lhl4 10,157 10,157 128,776 128,771i 3304 Subhllal Subht.] PerndPenod3b Pcriod.Dppl~ndt!lIt {'t)..~ts abPeriod-Dependent Cato 5,959 - 43,990 43,991 7,078 57,U:!7 57,027 0 19,11411 19,640 37,387 37,387 44:1,(1:1(1 44:I,O:m ah.O TOTAL PERIOD:1h TOTAL PERIOD :lb COHT COST M,I69 44,194 14,490 Ita,1iS2 118,662 22.,1 224 19,640 19,610 93,988 93,988 5(1'3.079 502,1179 444,5301 444,59ti 36A 55,169 PERIOD PERIOD 3c 3c ~- Fuel Fuel Storuge OperationtJShipping Storage Operntionnl` loipping Period Pen of 3c :k Din'(~llk>('ommiMionin!l Dire 1 D,.rommioioning Adivlllt'li Actioilios Purled :k Collol,rnl Cools
- 30.3.1 Sis'at Fuel Capital and Trsnu5,r 8,250 1,238 1,238 9,48M 9,498 9,488 9,4i!I!
- 30.3 Subtaat Porial 3c Collatoral Costa 8,250 1,~1li 1,238 9,488 9,488 Posool:k' 1'1~nod*Dl'pt'ndtml Pl,noti;k Peri.d.Dels'ndent C(lIIts
...45.
Cools
- k 4.1
- 30.4.3 In,.unmee Insoronco 4,5H2 4,582 458 5,041) 5,(14(1 6,114(1 5,()40 - - - -
- kA.2
- 30,4.2 I'fOpt-'rtylaXl-'fl Property 150,..5 8,857 856 9,74:1 9,743 9,743 9,74:1
- leAA 4.4 Nne ISFSI Flit'"
NRC ISFSI Foes 2,610 2,670 267 2117 2,937 2,9a7 2.937 2,937
- leA.S t4.5 EnlCllWnt"y Planning P,Fos EmergencyPlanning ..'" 16,856 16,856 1,61:1.6 106 18,542 18,542 18,542 18,542 - - -
- kA.H 4.6 ISf'SI 01..lingCosts ISFSIO,WrIlIHlg C- 80.
909 121 121 l}at 931 9:11 9:)1 499.114
- k.4.7 3 ,4.7 St'Cunty Slarr Barurity StaBCwl t:.:ml 24,610 24,610 3,692 3,692 28,31(2 28,aO'l 28302 28,:t02 - - 4\.1\1.114 30.4 88
- kA Utility Staff Cns!.
Utility S35(1 Cost lO,478 10,478 1,572 1,572 12,1150 12,{)5{J 12.(16(1 12,O5() - - I124,779 24,i79
- k.4 3e.4 Subtotal Period 3c Subtoal Period 3, Pl~nO\l*D"jll.'ndt!llt PorialDvpondout Coots Co"ts 68,86:1 68,86:3 8,681 8,681 77,544 77,544 77,544 77,544 - - - - - 62:1,89:1 62:1,89:1
;k R.00 TOTAL TOTAL PEnlODPERIOD ac 30 COS1' COST 77,113 77,113 !),919
!I,919 87,9:12 87.0:12 87.032 87,032 - - - - 112:1,893
()2:l,tma TLG TLGSert';ces, Seroices, Int!. Inc.
Clinton Posner Clinton Power Station Docuntettl Document E16-1640-006, 1:.'16-1640-006. Be,,. Ret'. 00 Decommissioning Decommissioning Coot Cost Anolyais Analysis Appendix}}