PNO-III-97-013, on 970226,licensee Reported Possible Radiation Overexposure to Radiographer,Although Preliminary Info Suggests Radiation Exposure May Have Been Received by Radiographer TLD & Not by Radiographer Himself

From kanterella
(Redirected from PNO-III-97-013)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
PNO-III-97-013:on 970226,licensee Reported Possible Radiation Overexposure to Radiographer,Although Preliminary Info Suggests Radiation Exposure May Have Been Received by Radiographer TLD & Not by Radiographer Himself
ML20138F443
Person / Time
Site: 03012825
Issue date: 02/27/1997
From: Caniano R, Madera J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
References
PNO-III-97-013, PNO-III-97-13, NUDOCS 9705050393
Download: ML20138F443 (2)


._

February 27, 1997 PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION OF EVENT OR UNUSUAL OCCURRENCE PN0-III-97-013 This preliminary notification constitutes EARLY notice of events of POSSIBLE safety or public interest significance. The information is as initially received without verification or evaluation, and is basically all that is known by Region III staff (Lisle, Illinois) on this date.

Facility Licensee Emergency Classification LONGVIEW INSPECTION, INC.

Notification of Unusual Event Longview Inspection. Inc.

Alert Brookfield, Wisconsin Site Area Emergency License No: 48-17480-01 General Emergency X Not Applicable

Subject:

POSSIBLE RADIOGRAPHY OVEREXPOSURES On February 26, 1997, the licensee reported a possible radiation overexposure to a radiographer, although preliminary information suggests

{

that the radiation exposure may have been received by the radiographer's l

thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) and not by the radiographer himself.

l The radiographer had worked at a temporary job site in Indiana.

l l

The TLD used by the radiographer, when processed, showed a dose range of j

240 to 510 rems (2.4 to 5.1 sieverts [Sv]). The TLD processor indicated that the dose measurement was considered to be a valid exposure to the badge.

The licensee has. investigated the possible overexposure and believes that it may not be valid for several reasons:

The radiographer worked for 9 days. January 2-9, 1997, and his self-reading dosimeter doses indicated an exposure of about 45 millirem (,45 millisieverts [mSv]) during that period.

The radiographer was interviewed and reported that there were no incidents or problems that might account for the high exposure, and that he has not felt any ill effects or symptoms since his work in January 1997.

The radiographer's helpeca@ rata 90 Bet /DhW1 deceived a radiation dose 050054 of about-70 millirem (.70 millisieYerts [69 ]) during the time period mSv involved.

ZE ( W L 0334 The licensee also intends to hheMkaNxamination and blood evaluation performed on the radiographer to determine if there is any medical evidence of an overexposure.

g.2g 9705050393 970227 PDR I&E O[I PNO-III-97-013 PDR

l PNO-III-97-013,

A Region III (Chicago) radiation specialist will conduct an inspection at the licensee's site on February 27, 1997, to review the circumstances surrounding the possible overexposure. Regional personnel will interview i

the radiographer, who was a temporary employee and lives outside the region.

j i

The States of Indiana and Wisconsin will be informed. The information in this preliminary notification has been reviewed with licensee management.

1 The licensee reported this incident to the NRC Operations Center at 4:32 p.m. CST on February 26. 1997. This information is current as of 9:00 a.m. on February 27, 1997.

Contact:

JOHN MADERA ROY CANIANO (630)829-9834 (630)829-9801 i

,