PM-91-036, Forwards fitness-for-duty Performance Data for Jul-Dec 1990
| ML20029A829 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 02/26/1991 |
| From: | Calone L LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| PM-91-036, PM-91-36, NUDOCS 9103040336 | |
| Download: ML20029A829 (6) | |
Text
'
p
_ w -wew
! / Mg*O j LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COM PANY i uuTtManstgraf f
m; SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION
- P.O DOX 02f
- WADING RIVER NEW YORK 11792 TEL ($161929 8300 IN-91-036 Pebruary 26, 1991 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Camission Dacument Control Desk Washincton, DC 20555 Attn: Office of NRR Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Re:
Fitness for Duty Program Perfomance July - Decanber,1990
Dear Sir:
In accordance with 10CFR26.71(d), enclosed is the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station's Fitness for Duty Program performance data for the reporting period of July - Decenbor,1990.
Sincetely,
'}
J )C <
(
s L. J. Calone Plant Manager IJC/IMG/mp Enclosure cc: Thcmas T. Martin Reglonal Administrator b
1
.3 9103040336 9102:26 PDR ADOCK 05000322 0,
CB R
(
CO p
FC 8682.2 k
~_
n 1.
Initiatives Taken a)
Revision 1 to the Shoreham Fitness for Duty (FFD) Program was issued in November, 1990. The following items were included in this revision:
Fol cu-up test program was stipulated for personnel rettrning from disciplinary action for alcohol abuse.
15 minute mandatory waiting period prior.to alcohol
~
testing was eliminated.
Dehavioral observation program was better defined.
In recognition of Shoreham's dafueled status, and in accordance with NRC Exmption dated 8/21/90, the scope of personnel subject to randcm testing was reduced to only those personnel th unescorted access to the Reactor Building, Control Rocm, Relay Ibcm, Battery Roca C, or Central Alarm Station, b) An audit of the Shoreham Fitness for Duty Program was conducted by Nuclear Quality Assurance in December,'1990. The audit concluded that the Shoreham Fitness for Duty Program was being adequately implemented. In order to improve administrative control of the pIr> gram, meetings are being held at approximately nonthly intervals between the FFD Program Manager, the MRO, and the Medical Administrator, l
One specific finding involved the laboratory used to analyze urine samples.
10CFR26 Appendix A Paragraph 2.7(k) (2) states in part, "HHS certified -
laboratories shall have the capability, at the same laboratory premises, of performing _ initial tests for each drug and drug nutabolite -for which service is offered, and for performing confirmatory tests for alcohol 1and for each drug and drug metabolite for which service is offered." In i
addition, Paragraph 2.7(m) states in part, prior to the award of'a l
contract, the licensee shall carry out pre-award inspections and evaluation of the procedural aspects of the laboratories' drug testing operation.
-*---r y
yg*
w p-
-3
Contrary to the above, the Employee Health Cet _r and Walk-In Medical, the two collection centers utilized by Liloa, were sending specimens for drug testing to Roche Labs at their North Carolina, Research Triangle Park facility instead of the Lilco-approved Roche Lab facility in Dublin, Ohio.
This resulted based on a suggestion frun Roche Labs in an effort to improve service.
In addition, the Federal certificatic'1 for amphetamines at the North Carolina facility had been suspended; on this basis the facility would be ineligible to perform testing per NBC regulations. Lilco had been-informed of this condition and continued to send specimens to this location. The North Carolina lab has since had the suspension lifted.
It was determined that none of the randan samples analyzed by_ Roche Labs _
in Research Triangle Park had been positive for any drugs, including amphetamines.
The point was stressed to Health Center personnel that the SNPS Fitness for Duty Program is in compliance with 10CFR26 and, as such, contained certain requirenents that were above and beyond the requiremnts of the DCfr Fitness for Duty Program.
The Employee Health Center was advised not to implanent changes without first consulting the Fitness for Duty Program Manager.. As noted above, meetings will be held, at approximately monthly intervals, between the FTD Program Manager, Medical Administrator, and MRO, to facilitate this.
Health Center personnel have been briefed on the two specific requirements noted:
1.
Samples can be analyzed only at laboratories which have had a pre-award inspection and evaluation performed by l
NOT.
I 2.
If a laboratory loses its certification, it cannot be used for analyzing samples.
l Lilco NO\\ obtained an audit, and approved for use, the Roche facility located in Research Triangle Park, NC. = Additional audits were scheduled in February for the Roche facility in Raritan, NJ and the Metpath facility in Toterboro, tU.
This will provide back-up capability if certification is lost in the future, c) Two surveillances were conducted by Nuclear Quality Assurance to ensure satisfactory implenentation of the FFD Program at the two specimen collection facilities -((1) Walk-In Medical Center and (2) Lilco's Corporate Health Center).
Collection Center personnel were found to be knowledgeable and cognizant of their responsibilities. As a result of these surveillances, the FFD Program was revised to delineate requirements for background checks for collection site personnel.
.s 2.
Effectiveness Evaluation f
Based on the lcw number of positive test results, Lilco's Fitness for Duty.
Program has been effective in meeting its objective of " maintaining a safe work environment by ensuring a drug and alcohol-free kork force." This determination of effectiveness is reinforced by other indications such as, no instances of finding drugs or alcohol on premises, no for-cause-impairmnt tests, and the low number of allegations involving Fitness for Duty concerns.
1 3.
Data Analysis and Actions a) The low number of positive test resulta indicate -that drug.
and/or alcohol abuse is not a problem at Shoreham. Actions'taken for the positlve tests results were as follows:
re-employment drug test positive - person was denied' o
employmnt.
The employee wa:: remved Randcm drug test positive
~
from the Protected Area in accordance with regulations and referred to an EAP. A rehabilitation program was established, and a follow-up test progra-
.as been implemnted, consisting of one (1) test a inonth for four (4.) months, and then one (1) test per: quarter for the following 2 years and 8. months. Access no_the protected area has been restored for this individual, 4.
List of Events Reported l
l No events were reported during this reporting period, s
i
~
- ..,,...~-,
Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 Long Island Lightihg Company December 31, 1990 compay awnmines Shoreham Nuclear Power Station P.O.
Box 628 Locanon i
Robert W.
Grunseich (516)-929-8300 Ext. 3206 Contact Mme Phone (include area code) -
Outoffs: Screen / Confirmation (ng/ml)
U Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana
/
Amphetamines
/
/
Cocaine
/
Phencyclidine
/
/
Opiates
/
Alcohol (% BAC)
-/
Long Term-Short Term Testing Results Contractor Contractor Ucensee Employees Personnel Personnel Average Number with
^
Unescorted Access
- 458 N/A 246 y
Referred Access Categories Tested Positive to EAP Restored Tested Positive Tested Positive 1
i Pre employment N/A N/A p
N/A N/A N/A N/A Pre badging *
- 51 1
- / [-
.37 0
Periodic o
o
_}
0 0
x Forcause o
o R
4
-- O O
Post accident 0
0 ki
,0 0
l l -*
^}'-2
't [-: )-
t Random 252 1
a" 129 0
s Follow up o
o-h o
o Other 0
0
'y 0
0 t
Total 303 2
1 1
166 0
- Includes personnel assigned to the EOF /TSC as appropriate..
Pre-badging numbers also-include pre-employment tests.
\\
I 7
I I I I
I I
1 i i I i
!i i
I i i
iI I
ij i i i
i I
Q lIIi i
l I~
I iiI I i _ i 1
I i i i I ii i ! I Iiii!
ii !
ii!
I I I is iii i
i i i I i i !
i ~M i ii i j i I i
i )
Tf, I i I 'I I
- i i i i r
i ri i !
i iii i
~
l i i Ii I
i N
Il l l I I I I
li1 !
I Ii i i i
I II i i bI it i f iif i
y Ii!i Iiili C
'I f~I. ~!
C I'
i i
w i
i I~
iiiii M
l iI i
III I i k
g i I I
!!Ii!
m i i i
iil iI Q
li i
i iTM~
U i
g r-m i r,-
8, C
iiii i 1 Fi 1
(f) t4 hiI iiiI i i
b FiI
- i. l ~i i I i
d w
^~
f i:
i i ii i
i ;
i i iI tIfl 3
N H
C i ii l i i i i ii W
.Z N
n i I Ij i n G
t b
w m
Z H
illi i i i i Fi d
H s
o o
o o
i iiIi! I~i h
i
!iIi i i i I~i
- c 3
lIIi l I TI~.
'In C
e co i i i i i i i Ft~i' C
T H
v 1i i l I I 1 } I~
1 4
I a
s o
o o
N iiiil i i i l' h
w I~
,i i 1 e g
I!
E t i i
I t i i w
i i i i i i I7 Y Z
!i i i i i ii i
O I i i I II~i l l I
h
( ii I I I ! FIT i ii ii i i i iii O
i ii i i i i i iiI i ii iiiiI i ii TiI iI l Iiii
~Iii iiil ii i~l Iiii i ilI !i iil i i i iiii i
l i
i I
W T M N v-V t
2 2
N w
h o
e 4
m
.9
.9 E
S o
o m
E 9
n 3
9 OE c
m t
m 3
7 8
i8 d?.
'iB i
8 2
m 3
x e
e c-c e-m 8
a.
e 2
.8 s
x 3R e Bt 5
o O
c.
<