NUREG-0066, Forwards Response to Comments Contained in C Kepford Ltr Re Costs/Benefits Info Presented in Draft suppl,NUREG-0066
| ML19220B870 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 10/14/1976 |
| From: | Cleary D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Moore V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7904270544 | |
| Download: ML19220B870 (3) | |
Text
.
0 DISTRIBUTION Decket No. 50-320 NRR r/f DSE r/f CBAB r/f OCT I4 579
.,cc<et ho. SG-32G
- 'E.Gi'JX i;M FCx: Vcss A. Ficore, Assistant uirector for Envirenc. ental irejects FELN:
Donald P. Clean, Section Leader, Regicnal Ic;act Analysis Section, Cost-i.enefit Anal sis cra:.ch
/
SU5 JECT:
TH.~,EE i,ILE ISLUJ, UNIT c P1).;!T Mr.E: Three Mile Island, Unit 2 LICENS! M STAGE: CL ECCKET lit:EER: 50-320 FESFCNSISLE TJAUCH: Environcental Projects.',0.
3 P.@ JECT WASCP.: Jan riorris SESCRIPTION OF RESTCfiSE: Cccr.ents on Ti.ree Islar.d, Unit 2 REVIE!f STATLS: Restonse to cc: rents of part of letter from Chauncey Kepford completeo.
Attachec are the res;:enses to car.nents concerning costs tresented in tne Craf t Su;;ple. cent, 7,U'lEr,-CC66.
Tr.c sttacracnt was prepared by Lcuis Eykeski, Cost-l'enefit Ar.alysis 3rancr., C 2-7506.
Ocnala F. Cleary, Sectitn Leader i.eS onal I. i;act Analysis acticn i
Cost-senefit Analysis Eranc:,
Division of Site :afety anc 79042705@r Envircrnental Analysis
".I
'l cc: w/o enclosure cc: w/ enclosure
. :oya
'. 7eran
,,. c2cnalc
.:. 2crris
. Erist
- e. Fine
.'. C l e a r L.
'esxi DSE:ET:CSAB DSE:ET:CSAB i:jme DCp. ;/
S,'3
~., j
...s.-
- ! 1-6 10-if-76 S ATE 9 s
T2.m A2C.313 t Rev. 9 9)) AI O i 0240 2 v. s. eovs m a n s**v **,= vine orwie ss n ote-sas.i es
ESPONSE TO CC"ME!1TS OF LETTER FRCM CHAUNCEY KEPFORD 1.
Comments on pages 2 and 3 which relate to the Price-Anderson Act.
This consideration is beyond the scope of this case. The Environmental Project Manager should turn to the Antitrust and Indemnity Group, wnich has lead responsibility for a general statement of policy.
2.
Comments on pages 4 and 5 which relate to the cost comparison of nuclear and coal units presanted in Table 8.2.
Table 8.2 has been clarified by (1) labeling the investment cost and fixed operation and maintenance costs as " annual costs $/KW rather than $/kW-yr (these costs are incurred regardless of level of output); and (2) by inclusion of a footnote to explain how to obtain costs per kilowatt hour of output.
3.
Comments on bottom of page 5 which rclate to coal operation and maintenance costs relative to nuclear operation and maintenance cos ts.
The coal operation and maintenance costs included estimates for operating scrubbing equipment and are therefore higner than present oceration and maintenance costs for clants using high sulfur coal without such equipment (See ER, Section 8.4).
e P.
83 755
~vw i
ll t
i e
I TABLE 8.2
'l EC0h0HICS OF ALIERNATIVE EliERGY SOURCES AS A FUNCTION OF CAPAtlIY FACT fi (h0 CLEAR UNIT AND COAL UNIT 880 11W. CPERATION IN 1978)
Base Coal 9
Nuclear
~6 80 7
~ CO 60~
70 80 50 Q
Capacity factor i
Costs
- 1.
Investment Cost. -$h l+-ya 107.40 107.40 107.40 107.40 69.75 69.75 69.75 69.75 w.lGNu fyJ
~ ~ ~ ~
11.76 11.76 11.76 11.76 7.35 7.35 7.35 7.35 G m.< l f:. Jn gjkJ j
2.
Ilmed 0 & H. -5/W'7P
??
5.39 6.46 7.54 8.62 16.12 19.34 22.57 25.79
,f 3.
Variable 0 & H. $/kW-yr 14.10 16.92 19.75 22.57 64.65 77.58 90.51 103.44 4.
f uel.1/W-yr C
138.65 142.54 146.45 150.35 157.87 174.02 190.10 206.33 BASE BASE BASE DASE 19.22 31.48 43.73 55.98
{
Toial Cost. $/6W-yr Differential Cost. 3/kW-yr 31.25 35.14 39.05 42.95 88.12 104.27 120.43 136.58 lotal Operating Cost.
$/6W-yr (2
- 3
- 4) C RASE BASE BASE BASE 56.87 69.13 81.33 93.63 Dif ferential Operating Cost.
1/6W-yr Calculated from revised data in ER. Table 8.4-1.
500RCE:
'All costs are 1978 estimated values.
eased on leveltzed fixed charge of 15 percent.
b Q
- h W M %fL p 15A n t.$swv, & de & hf ld Ausa. g opty gst, w M
dt bb.
[:'
yet%d fmth oh cg 7
e
... - -