|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARNRC-2014-0257, Comment (3) of Katherine Mendez on PRM-50-109, Improved Identification Techniques Against Alkali-Silica Reaction Concrete Degradation at Nuclear Power Plants2015-01-24024 January 2015
Comment (3) of Katherine Mendez on PRM-50-109, Improved Identification Techniques Against Alkali-Silica Reaction Concrete Degradation at Nuclear Power Plants
ML15026A3382015-01-16016 January 2015
Comment (2) of Lynne Mason on PRM-50-109, Improved Identification Techniques Against Alkali-Silica Reaction Concrete Degradation at Nuclear Power Plants
ML15026A3392015-01-12012 January 2015
Comment (1) from Josephine Donovan Regarding PRM-50-109, Improved Identification Techniques Against Alkali-Silica Reaction Concrete Degradation at Nuclear Power Plants
ML12122A1062012-04-30030 April 2012
Comment (19) of William R. Harris on Behalf of Foundation for Resilient Sociieties Regarding Station Blackout
ML1125211062011-09-0909 September 2011
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 ESBWR Design Certification Amendment
ML1125210392011-09-0909 September 2011
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment
NRC-2010-0135, Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment2011-09-0909 September 2011
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment
NRC-2010-0291, Comment (1) of Mark Strauch, Earth Day Commitment/Friends of the Coast Et. Al. PRM-54-6 Regarding Request to Amends Its Regulations on 10 CFR 54.172010-10-25025 October 2010
Comment (1) of Mark Strauch, Earth Day Commitment/Friends of the Coast Et. Al. PRM-54-6 Regarding Request to Amends Its Regulations on 10 CFR 54.17
ML1020700442010-07-22022 July 2010
Comment (6) of Scott Boggs, on Behalf of Nextera Energy, on Proposed Rule PR-50, Regarding American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Codes and New and Revised ASME Code Cases
L-2009-230, 2009/10/19-Comment (41) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Co., on Proposed Rules PR-50 & PR-52, Re Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations2009-10-19019 October 2009
2009/10/19-Comment (41) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Co., on Proposed Rules PR-50 & PR-52, Re Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations
ML0929406172009-10-19019 October 2009
2009/10/19-Comment (41) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Co., on Proposed Rules PR-50 & PR-52, Re Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations
ML0615600232006-05-26026 May 2006
Comment (13) Submitted by Florida Power & Light Company, J. A. Stall on Proposed Rules PR-1, 2, 10, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 72, 73, 75, 95, 140, 170 and 171 Re Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants
ML0614600392006-05-25025 May 2006
Comment (1) Submitted by Thomas G. Haynes, on Proposed Rule PR-72, Regarding List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: NUHOMS-HD Addition
L-2006-076, Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power and Light Company, J.A. Stall on Proposed Rule PR-50, Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant-Accident Technical Requirements2006-03-15015 March 2006
Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power and Light Company, J.A. Stall on Proposed Rule PR-50, Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant-Accident Technical Requirements
L-2005-266, Comment (71) Submitted by Florida Pwr & Light Co. and FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC, J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs2005-12-27027 December 2005
Comment (71) Submitted by Florida Pwr & Light Co. and FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC, J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs
ML0504004022005-01-20020 January 2005
Comment (241) Submitted by Kristie Conrad Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-73-12, Upgrade the Design Basis Threat Regulations
L-2003-115, Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power & Light Co., J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rules PR-170 & 171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 20032003-05-0202 May 2003
Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power & Light Co., J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rules PR-170 & 171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2003
ML0230300082002-10-18018 October 2002
Comment (9) Submitted by North Atlantic Energy Service Corporation, James M. Peschel, on Proposed Rule PR-50 and PR-52 Re Combustile Gas Control in Containment
ML0211200892002-03-29029 March 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on Draft Regulatory Guides DG-1091 & DG-1112 for Seabrook Station
ML0203100362002-01-25025 January 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Nrc'S Enforcement Program 66 Fed. Reg. 64890, December 14, 2001 from North Atlantic
2015-01-24
[Table view] |
Text
PRM-54-6 (75FR591 58)
MARK STRAUCH 10 130 SOLEDAD CANYON RD. DOCKETED USNRC LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO 880 1 October 27, 2010 (4:00pm)
OFFICE OF SECRETARY October 25, 2010, RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.
Reference:
Docket Number NRC-2010-0291 I would like to offer the following comments on docket NRC-2010-0291:
By petitioner's logic, the proposed 10 year renewal limit should be 5 years, since there will be people born and commercial interests affected after 10 years that are "yet unable or unprepared to speak for themselves." This is nonsense. One could argue that having a licensee apply more than 10 years out actually gives residents, potential residents, or commercial interests greater opportunity not to locate in the area of the plant if they so desire.
Petitioner would have one believe that the NRC is powerless once a renewal is docketed to address any of the potential safety or aging-related issues enumerated in the petition. This is more nonsense.
Petitioner would have one believe that a 20 year renewal window somehow circumvents or frustrates NEPA. It does no such thing. This assertion is predicated on the (misguided) belief that somehow there will be dramatic changes in how solar, wind, or other renewables penetrate the grid. When employed, I watched the California Altamont wind farm in dismay every day. I look forward to Cape Wind being litigated over the next decade. Consumers and energy regulators need certainty in the near, mid, and long-term horizon. Early nuclear power plant license renewal injects more certainty, not less, in that process.
Petitioner's conclusions convey no demonstrable safety, security, or environmental concerns regarding Seabrook; just their ideological opposition. This petition needs to be rejected.
Sincerely, Mark Strauch T~r9 oVsec-4o0 DS 10
Page 1 of 1 As of: October 27, 2010 Received: October 25, 2010 Status: PendingcPist PU BLICTracking No. 80b7678b Comments Due: December 13, 2010 ISubmission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2010-0291 Earth Day Commitment/Friends of the Coast, Beyond Nuclear, Seacoast Anti-Pollution League, C-10 Research and Education Foundation, Pilgrim Watch, and New England Coalition Comment On: NRC-2010-0291-0003 Earth Day Commitment/Friends of the Coast, Beyond Nuclear, Seacoast Anti-Pollution League, C-10 Research and Education Foundation, Pilgrim Watch, and New England Coalition; Notice of Receipt of Petition for Rulemaking Document: NRC-2010-0291-DRAFT-0003 Comment on FR Doc # 2010-24132 Submitter Information Name: Mark Strauch General Comment Comment attached as PDF Attachments NRC-2010-0291-DRAFT-0003.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-24132 https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterlnfoCoverPage?Call=Print&Printld... 10/27/2010
Rulemaking Comments From: Gallagher, Carol Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 11:22 AM To: Rulemaking Comments
Subject:
Comment on PRM-54-6 Attachments: NRC-2010-0291-DRAFT-0003.pdf
- Van, Attached for docketing is a comment on PRM-54-6 (75 FR 59158) that I received via the regulations.gov website on October 25, 2010.
- Thanks, Carol I
Received: from HQCLSTR01 .nrc.gov ([148.184.44.76]) by TWMS01 .nrc.gov
([148.184.200.145]) with mapi; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:21:47 -0400 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary From: "Gallagher, Carol" <Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov>
To: Rulemaking Comments <Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:21:49 -0400
Subject:
Comment on PRM-54-6 Thread-Topic: Comment on PRM-54-6 Thread-Index: Act16qzp8ba8ker3QMudkaQd13OCmQ==
Message-ID:
<6F9E3C9DCAB9E448AAA49B8772A448C5469C1 92419@HQCLSTRO01. nrc.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
<6F9E3C9DCAB9E448AAA49B8772A448C5469C1 92419@HQCLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
