Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARNL-16-0432, Comment (125) of Charles R. Pierce on Behalf of Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc., on ANPR-26, 50, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors2016-03-17017 March 2016 Comment (125) of Charles R. Pierce on Behalf of Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc., on ANPR-26, 50, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors ML14022A2822013-12-21021 December 2013 Comment (00930) of Michael Keegan on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13346A2142013-12-0404 December 2013 Comment (00366) of Roger Emmons on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13339A2982013-12-0404 December 2013 Comment (00330) of Lee Roscoe on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML13336B4712013-12-0101 December 2013 Comment (00306) of Charles Bagwell on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel NRC-2010-0135, Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment2011-09-0909 September 2011 Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment ML1125210392011-09-0909 September 2011 Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment ML1125211062011-09-0909 September 2011 Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 ESBWR Design Certification Amendment NL-09-1658, Comment (15) of M. J. Ajluni, on Behalf of Southern Nuclear Operating Company, on ANPR 50 Regarding Performance-Based Emergency Core Cooling System Acceptance Criteria2009-10-27027 October 2009 Comment (15) of M. J. Ajluni, on Behalf of Southern Nuclear Operating Company, on ANPR 50 Regarding Performance-Based Emergency Core Cooling System Acceptance Criteria ML0929406192009-10-20020 October 2009 2009/10/20-Comment (42) of Christopher E. Boone on Behalf of Southern Nuclear Operating Company, on Proposed Rules Pr 50 & 52, Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations NL-09-0513, Comment (9) of Mark J. Ajluni, on Behalf of Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., on Pr 170 and 171 - Revision of Fee Schedule; Fee Revovery for Fy 20092009-03-31031 March 2009 Comment (9) of Mark J. Ajluni, on Behalf of Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., on Pr 170 and 171 - Revision of Fee Schedule; Fee Revovery for Fy 2009 ML0907003322009-02-10010 February 2009 Comment (155) of Moanica M. Caston, on Behalf of Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Re Pr 51, Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation and Related Waste Confidence. ML0904802662009-02-0505 February 2009 Comment (141) of Elizabeth Adams on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update NRC-2008-0482, 2009/02/04-Comment (136) of Joan Mumaw on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update2009-02-0404 February 2009 2009/02/04-Comment (136) of Joan Mumaw on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update NRC-2008-0404, Comment (136) of Joan Mumaw on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update2009-02-0404 February 2009 Comment (136) of Joan Mumaw on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update ML0904800492009-02-0303 February 2009 Comment (122) of Randy Kehler Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update ML0904804002009-02-0202 February 2009 Comment (88) of Sally Shaw on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update ML0904402452009-01-29029 January 2009 Comment (44) of Scott Ainslie on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update ML0904403152009-01-28028 January 2009 Comment (37) of Sally Newton on Pr 51 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation, and Pr 51 Waste Confidence Decision Update ML0813402842008-05-0808 May 2008 Comment (22) of Ronald W Gaston on Behalf of Detroit Edison on Proposed Rules PR-20, 30, 40, 50, 70 and 72 Regarding Decommissioning Planning NL-08-0751, Comment (28) of David H. Jones, on Behalf of Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Supports Nei'S Comments on Proposed Rules PR-20, 30, 40, 50, 70 and 72 Regarding Decommissioning Planning2008-05-0808 May 2008 Comment (28) of David H. Jones, on Behalf of Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Supports Nei'S Comments on Proposed Rules PR-20, 30, 40, 50, 70 and 72 Regarding Decommissioning Planning ML0736105962007-12-19019 December 2007 Comment (30) of Dale M. Lloyd on Behalf of Southern Nuclear Operating Company Re Proposed Rules Pr 52, Consideration of Aircraft Impacts for New Nuclear Power Reactor Designs. ML0719201582007-06-27027 June 2007 Comment (23) of Charles A. Tomes on Proposed Rules Pr 50 Regarding Industry Codes and Standards; Amended Requirements NL-07-1232, Comment (21) of L. M. Stinson on Behalf of Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., on Proposed Rule Pr 50 Regarding Industry Codes and Standards; Amended Requirements2007-06-22022 June 2007 Comment (21) of L. M. Stinson on Behalf of Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., on Proposed Rule Pr 50 Regarding Industry Codes and Standards; Amended Requirements ML0717702482007-06-15015 June 2007 Comment (16) Submitted by Charles A. Tomes on Proposed Rule Pr 50 Regarding Industry Codes and Standards; Amended Requirements NL-07-1229, Comment (16) Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company, L. M. Stinson, on Pogo and Ucs PRM-50-83 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 50 Concerning Design Basis Threat2007-06-12012 June 2007 Comment (16) Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company, L. M. Stinson, on Pogo and Ucs PRM-50-83 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 50 Concerning Design Basis Threat ML0716300542007-06-11011 June 2007 Comment (5) Submitted by George L. Fechter on Proposed Rules PR-50 Regarding Industry Codes and Standards; Amended Requirements NL-07-0681, Comment (40) Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company, L. M. Stinson on Proposed Rulemaking PR-50, PR-72 & PR-73 Re Power Reactor Security Requirements2007-03-26026 March 2007 Comment (40) Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company, L. M. Stinson on Proposed Rulemaking PR-50, PR-72 & PR-73 Re Power Reactor Security Requirements ML0708100202007-03-20020 March 2007 Comment (2) Submitted by Matt Kirkland on Proposed Rules Pr 40, 72, 74 and 150 Regarding Regulatory Improvements to the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System NL-07-0010, Comment (3) Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Jeffrey T. Gasser on Proposed Rules PR-2, 30, 40, 50, 52, 60, 63, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76 & 150 Regarding Protection of Safeguards Information2007-01-0202 January 2007 Comment (3) Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Jeffrey T. Gasser on Proposed Rules PR-2, 30, 40, 50, 52, 60, 63, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76 & 150 Regarding Protection of Safeguards Information NRC-06-0081, Comment (7) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Ronald W. Gaston, on Proposed Rules PR-2, 30, 40, 50, 52, 60, 63, 70, 71, 73, 76, and 150, Regarding Protection of Safeguards Information2006-12-29029 December 2006 Comment (7) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Ronald W. Gaston, on Proposed Rules PR-2, 30, 40, 50, 52, 60, 63, 70, 71, 73, 76, and 150, Regarding Protection of Safeguards Information NRC-05-0087, Comment (68) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Ronald W Gaston on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs2005-12-27027 December 2005 Comment (68) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Ronald W Gaston on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs ML0536203092005-12-27027 December 2005 Comment (60) Submitted by Andrew V. Antrassian, on Behalf of the Utility Workers Union of America, on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs L-HU-05-029, Comment (51) Submitted by Nuclear Management Company, LLC, Edward J. Weinkam on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs2005-12-22022 December 2005 Comment (51) Submitted by Nuclear Management Company, LLC, Edward J. Weinkam on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs NRC-05-0028, Comment (2) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Norman K Peterson Supporting Proposed Rule 170 & 171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 20052005-03-22022 March 2005 Comment (2) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Norman K Peterson Supporting Proposed Rule 170 & 171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2005 ML0414501742004-05-20020 May 2004 Comment (2) Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating, John O. Meier, Re Proposed Interim Enforcement Policy for Pilot Program on the Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Enforcement Program Request for Comments ML0410602122004-04-0808 April 2004 Comment (6) Submitted by Detroit Edison, Norman Peterson, on Proposed Rules Pr 19, 20 & 50 Regarding Collection, Reporting, or Posting of Information; Availability of Draft Rule Language NL-04-0317, Comment (4) Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company, J. B. Beasley Jr., on Proposed Rules PR-170 & PR-171 Regarding Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for FY20042004-03-0202 March 2004 Comment (4) Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company, J. B. Beasley Jr., on Proposed Rules PR-170 & PR-171 Regarding Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for FY2004 NL-03-1751, Comment (16) Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Co., J. B. Beasley on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors2003-08-28028 August 2003 Comment (16) Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Co., J. B. Beasley on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors NRC-03-0058, Comment (10) Submitted by Detroit Edison ,Norman K. Peterson, Supporting Sander C. Perle Petition for Rulemaking PRM 20-25, Re Requirements That Dosimetry Used as Primary Dosimeter Shall Be Accredited2003-07-15015 July 2003 Comment (10) Submitted by Detroit Edison ,Norman K. Peterson, Supporting Sander C. Perle Petition for Rulemaking PRM 20-25, Re Requirements That Dosimetry Used as Primary Dosimeter Shall Be Accredited NL-03-1017, Comment (8) Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Jeffrey T. Gasser, on Proposed Rules PR-170 & PR-171, Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 20032003-05-0202 May 2003 Comment (8) Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Jeffrey T. Gasser, on Proposed Rules PR-170 & PR-171, Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2003 NRC-02-0068, Comment of Norman K. Peterson Re Response to Requests for Comment on Model Safety Evaluation on TS Improvement to Modify Requirements Regarding Mode Change Limitations Using Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process2002-09-0404 September 2002 Comment of Norman K. Peterson Re Response to Requests for Comment on Model Safety Evaluation on TS Improvement to Modify Requirements Regarding Mode Change Limitations Using Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process ML0213701042002-05-16016 May 2002 Comment (2) Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Co., D. N. Morey, on Petition for Rulemaking PRM 50-75 Regarding Amendment of the Nrc'S Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) Regulations to Allow the Use of Anl Alternative Maximum Pipe Br 2016-03-17
[Table view] |