MN 02-017, PSEG Nuclear LLC - NRC Annual Assessment Meeting Slides

PSEG Nuclear LLC - NRC Annual Assessment Meeting Slides

ML020870584
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	03/26/2002
From:	Meyer G Division Reactor Projects I
To:
References
MN 02-017
Download: ML020870584 (36)

Text

NRC FORM 658 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (9-1999)

TRANSMITTAL OF MEETING HANDOUT MATERIALS FOR IMMEDIATE PLACEMENT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN This form is to be filled out (typed or hand-printed) by the person who announced the meeting (i.e., the person who issued the meeting notice). The completed form, and the attached copy of meeting handout materials, will be sent to the Document Control Desk on the same day of the meeting; under no circumstances will this be done later than the working day after the meeting.

Do not include proprietary materials.

DATE OF MEETING The attached document(s), which was/were handed out in this meeting, is/are to be placed hY ).k I in the public domain as soon as possible. The minutes of the meeting will be issued in the near future. Following are administrative details regarding this meeting:

Docket Number(s)

C--o S'2*(

Plant/Facility Name

( i 4

TAC Number(s) (if available)

Reference Meeting Notice f')Thi-1 Purpose of Meeting (copy from meeting notice)

NAME OF PERSON WHO ISSUED MEETING NOTICE OFFICI)

DIVISION BRANCH Distribution of this form and attachments:

Docket File/Central File PUBLIC NRC FORM 658 (9-1999)

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER This form was designed using InForms

Safety Reliability

&Cost LThrough People!

PSEG NUCLEAR, LL C - NRC ANNUAL ASSESSMENT MEETING March 26, 2002

SSafety Reliability

&Cost Trough People!

Safety Reliability

.&Cost Through People!

AGENDA Safety Reliability L & Cost Through People!

0 Introduction Harry Keiser

• 2001 In Review Dave Garchow 0 Reliability Improvements 0 2002 Business Tim O'Connor Dave Garchow Plan

• Conclusions Harry Keiser

SSafety Reliability

&Cost 2001 In Review Thou°Pople!

• Results

"* Safety

"* Reliability

"* Cost

"* People

• Gaps to Top Quartile

Reliability Improvements Safety Reliability

&Cost LThrough People!

• Successes

• Focus Areas Improving Equipment Expertise Engaging Workers to Reduce Human Errors v

2002 Business Plan Safety Reliability IL &Cost nThrough People!

e 2002 Focus Areas

- Plant Performance

- Business Plan

° Security

Conclusion Safety Reliability S&Cost LThrough People!

• The Plants are Operating Safely

• Our Plan is Working

• Challenges Face Us

• We Will Adjust and Continue on Our Journey to Achieve Top Quartile

Annual Assessment Meeting Reactor Oversight Program - Cycle 2 Nuclear Regulatory Commission -Region I King of Prussia, PA

Agenda

"* Introduction

"* Reactor Oversight Process

"* Plant Performance Results

"* PSEG Nuclear Remarks

"* NRC Closing Remarks NRC will be available to address questions from the public afterward

NRC Representatives

"* Glenn Meyer, Chief Reactor Projects Branch

- (610) 337-5211

"* Robert Fretz, Project Manager - Salem, NRR

- (301) 415-1324

"* Richard Barkley, Senior Project Engineer

- (610) 337-5065

"* Ray Lorson, Senior Resident Inspector - Salem

- (856) 935-3850

"* Joseph Schoppy, Senior Resident Inspector -Hope Creek

- (856) 935-5151

"* Fred Bower, Resident Inspector - Salem

"* Chris Cahill, Resident Inspector - Hope Creek

NRC Activities

"* Ensure nuclear power plants are designed, constructed, and operated safely

"* Issue licenses for the peaceful use of nuclear materials in the U.S.

"* Ensure nuclear facilities are prepared to respond to emergencies

NRC Performance Goals

"- Maintain safety and protect the environment

" Enhance public confidence

" Improve effectiveness, efficiency, and realism of processes and decision making

" Reduce unnecessary regulatory burden

NRC Oversight Activities

"* Provides assurance plants are operating safely and in accordance with the regulations

"* Risk informed process

"* Objective indicators of performance

" Inspections focused on key safety areas

"* Defines expected NRC and licensee actions

NRC Response to 9/11

"* Highest Level of Security Maintained

"* Comprehensive Review of Security

"* Closely Coordinated Response With:

-- Licensees

-- FBI

-- Military, State, and Local Agencies

-- Intelligence Communities

"* Security Advisories

-- Increased Patrols

-- Augmented Security Capabilities

-- Added Barriers and Posts

-- More Limited Access

-- Enhanced Security Awareness

"* February 25th Order on Security

"* NRC Monitoring Enhanced Security

Reactor Oversight Process Strategic Performance Areas Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection

[ Results Regulatory Response

Examples of Baseline Inspections Hours Per Station

"* Equipment Alignment

"* Annual Fire Protection

"* Trienniel Fire Protection

"* Operator Response

"* Plant security

"* Emergency preparedness

"* Rad release controls

"* Worker radiation protection

"* Corrective action program

"* Corrective action program S70 hrs/yr

- 35 hrs/yr 200 hrs every 3 yrs 125 hrs/yr 40 hour4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br />s/yr 60 hrs/yr 100 hrs every 2 years 125 hrs/year 10% every inspecton S200 hr every 2 yrs

Action Matrix Concept Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Degraded Unacceptable

Response

Response Cornerstone Cornerstone Performance Increasing Safety Significance Increasing NRC Inspection Efforts Increasing NRC/Licensee Management Involvement Increasing Regulatory Actions I

C::::ý

National Summary of Plant Performance End of Calendar Year 2001 Licensee Response 74 Regulatory Response 24 Degraded Cornerstone 4

Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone 1

Unacceptable 0

Total Plants 103

National Summary I

Ill I *l

........tju-1 iN ll,,

1*-L 1 1 M-O N-*

l l m Performance Indicator Results 4th Qtr Calendar Yr 2001 Green White SYellow SRed:

• Total Inspection Findings (April 2001 Green SWhite SYellow Red

- December 2001) 660 23 2

0 1834 8

0 0

Salem and Hope Creek Inspection Activities (Jan 1 - Dec 31, 2001)

"* Approximately 6,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of inspection-related activity

"* Four on-site inspectors performing resident inspections

"* Numerous inspections by regional inspectors o Includes several team inspections

"* Inspection Findings 18 findings of very low safety significance at Salem 18 findings of very low safety significance at Hope Creek

Salem Annual Assessment (April 1 - Dec 31, 2001)

"* Operated safely

"* Fully met all cornerstone objectives

"* Licensee Response Band of Action Matrix

"* All Performance Indicators require no additional NRC oversight (Green)

• NRC plans to conduct baseline inspections

Salem Unit 1 Performance Indicators 4Q/2001 WWW.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/SALM1/sail 1chart.html Performance Indicators

Performance Indicator - Salem Unit 1 111111 11, 1 MINIM UM FI I WE.....

Unplanned Scrams per 7000 Critical Hrs 0fC 0a 0

5M 2.7 2.4 2.7 2.89 5-10 15 20 25 Thresholds: White > 3.0 Yellow > 6.0 Red > 25.0

Performance Indicator - Salem Unit 1 Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hrs 0

2 4

6 N

0 0

0*

0 0,

8 A f"lU Thresholds: White > 6.0

Salem Unit 1 IIIIII

• w 11111 g..

...."I'l-H.

IIIII I '

Inspection Finding Summary Most Significant Inspection Findings 4Q/2001 3Q/2001 2Q/20l01 1Qr2001I[~~~

ýozo 2Qs1g Additional Inspection & Assessment Information 1 Assessment Reports/Inspection Plans:

4Q/2001 3 Q/2001 2Q/2001 I Q/2001 C

Cross Reference Of Assessment Reports 1 List of Inspection Reports List of Assessment Letters/Inspection Plans E

Salem Unit 2 Performance Indicators 4Q/2001 WWW.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/SALM2/salm2-chart.html Performance Indicators liýwi

-%,-I vln

Salem Unit 2 Inspection Finding Summary Most Significant Inspection Findings 4Qr2O01 3Q/2001 2Q/2001 I W2001 I

M/.sceI/eneou8 frndin3 Additional Inspection & Assessment Information

Hope Creek Annual Assessment (April 1 - Dec 31, 2001)

"* Operated safely

"* Fully met all cornerstone objectives

"* Licensee Response Band of Action Matrix

"* All PIs require no additional NRC oversight (Green)

"* NRC plans to conduct only baseline inspections

Hope Creek Performance Indicators 4Q/2001 WWW.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/HOPE/hope-chart.html Performance Indicators 71 - -FIP I

111, U, Etp

Performance Indicator - Hope Creek Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hrs CY 0-0 0

N 0

2 4:

0Y M

0 0

0 8

10-Thresholds: White > 6.0 N

0t-0

'ej*

Hope Creek III

'1N I~~~~~~~~~~~l I

' w....

..I......

= L * '

Inspection Finding Summary Most Significant Inspection Findings 4Q/2001 3Q/2001 2Q/2001 1WQ2001 l sp ceti an e

s I

t Additional Inspection & Assessment Information

• Assessment Reports/nspection Plans:

40/nlflln List of Inspection Reports

• List of Assessment Letters/inspection Plans I

Reference Sources I11 1m g 1

II Jilln ii i i i I

i I '

"* Reactor Oversight Process o ttp://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/AS SES S/index.html

"* Public Electronic Reading Room http ://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

"* Public Document Room S 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free)

NRC Action Matrix Licensee Response Regulatory Response Degraded Cornerstone Muitiplel Repetitive Unacceptable Column Column Column Degraded Cornerstone Performance

__,,Column Columnj All Assessment Inputs One or Two White One Degraded Repetitive Degraded Overall Unacceptable (Performance Inputs (in different Cornerstone (2 White Cornerstone, Multiple Performance; Plants Indicators (Pis) and cornerstones) in a Inputs or I Yellow Degraded Not Permitted to J

Inspection Findings)

Strategic Performance Input) or any 3 White Cornerstones, Multiple Operate Within this Green; Cornerstone Area; Cornerstone Inputs In a Strategic Yellow Inputs, or I Red Band, Unacceptable w

Objectives Fully Met Objectives Fully Met Performance Area; Input; Cornerstone Margin to Safety Cornerstone Objectives Objectives Met with Met with Minimal Longstanding Issues or Reduction in Safety Significant Reduction In "Margin Safety Margin Regulatory None Branch Chief (BC) or DD or Regional RA (or EDO) Meet with Commission meeting Performance Meeting Division Director (DD)

Administrator (RA)

Senior Licensee with Senior Licensee Meet with Licensee Meet with Licensee Management Management Licensee Action Licensee Corrective Licensee Corrective Licensee Self Licensee Performance w

Action Action with NRC Assessment with NRC Improvement Plan with z

Oversight Oversight NRC Oversight IL NRC Inspection Risk-Informed Baseline Baseline and Baseline and Baseline and Inspection supplemental supplemental supplemental Program inspection procedure inspection procedure inspection procedure 95001 95002 95003 Regulatory Actions None Supplemental Supplemental

-10 CFR 2.204 DFI Order to Modify, inspection only inspection only

-10 CFR 50.54(0 Letter Suspend, or Revoke I'_

-CAL/Order Licensed Activities Assessment Reports BC or DD review/sign DD review/sign RA review/sign RA review/sign assessment report (w/

assessment report assessment report assessment report Inspection plan)

(w/ inspection plan)

(w/ inspection plan)

(w/ inspection plan)

__Commission Informed 0

Annual Public Meeting SRI or BC Meet with BC or DD Meet with RA (or designee)

EDO (or Commission)

Commission Meeting U

Licensee Licensee Discuss Performance Discuss Performance with Senior Licensee with Licensee with Senior Licensee Management I ---

1Management

W PN*

0

?p

Simplified Pressurized Water Reactor Containment Throttle Valve Main Turbine

_1 Feecwater Pump Ge RCP Reactor Svsl em rt Int A'