ML25363A135

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
January 5 2026 Letter to M Mckinley Re Kentucky Periodic Meeting Scheduling Letter and Agenda
ML25363A135
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/05/2026
From: Shawn Seeley
Decommissioning, ISFSI, and Reactor Health Physics Branch
To: Mckinley M
State of KY, Cabinet for Health and Family Services
References
Download: ML25363A135 (0)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 475 ALLENDALE ROAD, SUITE 102 KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-1415 Matthew W. McKinley, Administrator Radiation Health Program Cabinet for Health & Family Services 275 East Main Street Frankfort, KY 40621-0001

SUBJECT:

KENTUCKY PERIODIC MEETING SCHEDULING LETTER AND AGENDA

Dear Matthew McKinley:

To help the Agreement States and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) remain knowledgeable of each others program and to initiate planning for the next Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program (IMPEP) review, the NRC conducts one-day periodic meetings with Agreement States in between IMPEP reviews.

In accordance with the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards (NMSS) Procedure SA-116, Periodic Meetings between IMPEP Reviews, and after previous coordination with you, we have scheduled the periodic meeting for March 4, 2026. The meeting will be held virtually.

Based on our previous discussions, the likely topics for discussion at the meeting are listed on the enclosed agenda. If there are any additional specific topics you would like to cover, or if you would like to focus on a specific area, please let me know. If you have any questions, please call me at 610-337-5102, or via email at shawn.seeley@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, Shawn W. Seeley Regional State Agreements Officer Division of Nuclear Materials Safety

Enclosure:

Kentucky Periodic Meeting Agenda January 5, 2026 Signed by Seeley, Shawn on 01/05/26

Periodic Meeting Agenda with Kentucky Radiation Health Program March 4, 2026 Topic areas for discussion during the meeting may include:

1.

Program reorganizations:

Discuss any changes to the program organization, including program/staff relocations and new appointments.

2.

Changes in program budget/funding.

3.

Status of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) or States program, including:

a.

Technical Staffing and Training - 2024 Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program (IMPEP) - Satisfactory i)

Number of staff in the program and status of their training and qualifications.

ii)

Any program vacancies.

iii) Staff turnover since the last IMPEP review.

iv) Adequacy of full-time equivalent for the materials program.

v)

Status of implementation of Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) IMC 1248 Recommendation: NONE b.

Status of Materials Inspection Program - 2024 IMPEP - Satisfactory i)

Number of Priority 1, 2, and 3 inspections completed on time and overdue since the last IMPEP review.

ii)

Number of initial inspections completed on time and overdue since the last IMPEP review.

iii) Number of reciprocity inspections completed each year since the last IMPEP.

iv) Inspection frequencies (changes to or those that differ from NRCs inspection frequencies).

Recommendation: NONE c.

Technical Quality of Inspections - 2024 IMPEP - Satisfactory i)

Status of inspector accompaniments.

ii)

Management review process iii) Significant inspection activities/challenges Recommendation: NONE d.

Technical Quality of Licensing Actions - 2024 IMPEP - Satisfactory i)

Number of licensing actions and types performed since the last IMPEP review.

Recommendation: NONE e.

Technical Quality of Incident and Allegation Activities - 2024 IMPEP - Satisfactory i)

Status of allegations and concerns referred by the NRC for action.

ii)

Significant events and generic implications.

iii) Number of reportable events received since the last IMPEP and event reporting, including follow-up and closure information in Nuclear Material Events Database.

Recommendation: NONE f.

Legislation, Regulations, and Other Program Elements - 2024 IMPEP - Satisfactory i.

Regulations a.

Compatibility requirements b.

Discuss status of States regulations and actions to keep regulations up to date, including the use of legally binding requirements and sunset requirements.

ii.

Legislative changes affecting the program.

iii. Sunset Requirements iv. Other Program Elements Recommendation: NONE g.

Sealed Source and Device (SS&D) Evaluation Program - 2024 IMPEP - Satisfactory i)

Technical Staffing and Training a.

Number of qualified SS&D reviewers and their signature authority.

b.

Number of current or anticipated program vacancies.

c.

Staff turnover since the last IMPEP review.

ii)

Technical Quality of the Product Evaluation Program a.

Number of cases since the last IMPEP review to include new cases, amendments, inactivations and transfers.

iii) Evaluation of Defects and Incidents Regarding SS&Ds a.

Any cases noted involving manufacturing defects since the last IMPEP review?

Recommendation: NONE 4.

Information Exchange:

a.

Current program initiatives; b.

Emerging technologies; c.

Large, complicated, or unusual authorizations for use of radioactive materials; d.

Major decommissioning and license termination actions; e.

Mechanisms to evaluate performance such as self-audits; f.

Operating/strategic plan metrics and outcomes, if applicable; and, g.

Current NRC initiatives.

5.

Schedule for the next IMPEP review (~2 years).

6.

Next Steps/Meeting Summary/Q&A.

7.

Exit with Senior Management if requested by the NRC or Agreement State.

ML25363A135 OFFICE R-I/DNMS/MLAB NAME SSeeley DATE Jan 5, 2026