ML25343A322
| ML25343A322 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 04/02/2025 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-III/DORS/OB |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co |
| Gregory Roach | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML23202A155 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML25343A322 (0) | |
Text
Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Facility: Dresden Nuclear Station Date of Examination: 4/14/25 Task Description (Y)es/ (N)o Item a
b*
c#
- a. The outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with the
- '/
z instructions in Section B of ES-4.1, and all knowledge and ability (KIA) w I:=
categories are appropriately sampled.
a:
- b. The outline does not overemphasize any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
'{
s:
y y
- c. Justifications for deselected or rejected Kl A statements are acceptable.
- a. Using Form 3.4-1, Events and Evolutions Checklist, verify that the proposed scenario set contains the required number of normal evolutions, reactivity
'I f evolutions, instrument and component failures, manual control evolutions, technical specifications, and major transients.
cc
- b. There are enough scenarios (and spares) for the projected number and mix of 0
~
applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation
,, i
..J schedule without compromising exam integrity. Ensure that scenarios will not be
=>
- E repeated on subsequent days.
u5
- c. Ensure that all scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-y 3.4 and that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test{s).
y
- d. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative y y and quantitative simulator set criteria specified on Form 2.3-2.
- a. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified in the instructions on Form 3.2-1 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' y y audit test(s).
- b. Verify that the control room and in-plant systems outline meets the criteria t
- iii specified in the instructions on Form 3.2-2 and that no tasks are duplicated from '(
- a.
the applicants' audit test(s).
C. Determine whether the number of job performance measures (JPMs) and JPM types is sufficient for the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure y y that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- a. Assess whether the appropriate exam sections cover plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination
'i y insights).
- b. Assess whether the 1 O CFR 55.41, 10 CFR 55.43, and 10 CFR 55.45 sampling is
'I y
..J appropriate.
c(
- c. Check whether KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are a:
y y w
greater than or equal to 2.5.
z w
- d. Check for duplication and overlap across the exam and with the last two NRC C,
'I y exams.
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
y V
- f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (reactor operator or senior y y reactor operator).
I
- .. Aidhor Printed fgNitUM /
n-.ar Rl1wt~ I.. * *_;x..:;,_ 7/
A
,~het
- b. Facility Revktwer M I.UH~
\\J/itliit
- c. NRCRevfeWlt(#)
(/
NRCChtef--
NRC SupervlJDr
- The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-cleveloped tests.
- An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column "c." This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the outline under review.
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Gregory M. Roach, Jr.
Gregory M. Roach, Jr.
3/27/25 3/27/25 PAUL ZURAWSKI Digitally signed by PAUL ZURAWSKI Date: 2025.04.02 06:42:41 -05'00'