ML25272A104

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Public Meeting Slides - Potential Force-on-Force Inspection Enhancements
ML25272A104
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/29/2025
From: Jeffrey Bream
NRC/NSIR/DSO/SOSB
To:
References
Download: ML25272A104 (9)


Text

Potential Force-on-Force Inspection Enhancements Jeff Bream, Senior Security Risk Analyst Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response Division of Security Operations jeffrey.bream@nrc.gov

Security Inspection Program Rebaseline

  • On August 19, 2025, the NRC held a public meeting to discuss an assessment of the security baseline inspection program to:

- Enhance efficiency

- Improve resource utilization

- Reduce unnecessary burden

- Maintain a strong risk-informed regulatory presence

  • The assessment includes a review and development of potential changes to the NRC Force-on-Force inspection program.

Potential Enhancements to the Force-on-Force Inspection Program

  • Exploring improvements to the scenario development process to identify procedure efficiencies.
  • Development and implementation of scenario scoring methodology.
  • Increased licensee engagement in the exercise scenario development process.
  • Three potential paths under consideration

- Database of Industry-Developed Generic Exercise Scenarios

- Database of Licensee-Developed Site-Specific Scenarios

- Licensee-Developed Inspection-Specific Exercise Scenarios

Public Engagement

  • NRC introduced this topic on July 23rd and discussed in more detail on August 19th
  • Comments received during the public meetings and after have been reviewed

- NEI Letter: Industry Recommendations on Force-on-Force Program Modernization in Response to August 19, 2025, Public Meeting (ML25245A250)

Scenario Scoring Methodology

  • All options under consideration will include a scenario scoring methodology
  • Design basis threat (DBT) attributes would be assigned a numerical value
  • An upper and lower threshold would be established to bound complexity
  • Scoring would ensure the developed scenario does not exceed the adequate protection standard

Potential Path 1: Database of Industry-Developed Generic Exercise Scenarios

  • Industry would develop high-level generic exercise scenarios based on general attack methodologies.

- External assault, land vehicle assault, waterborne, coordinated, etc.

  • Scenarios would include the core DBT elements and base scoring value for the mission profile.
  • NRC would choose one of the generic scenarios, a target set, and the attack vector. Additional DBT attributes could also be chosen.

- Additional attributes would be bounded by the scoring threshold

  • Licensee would develop the detailed mission narrative based on the NRC input.

Potential Path 2: Database of Licensee-Developed Site-Specific Scenarios

  • Licensees would develop a database of scenarios based on site-specific conditions and configuration.
  • NRC would choose a pre-developed scenario.
  • NRC could alter the route and DBT attributes due to conditions that are perceived to be advantageous to the adversary.

- Changes would be bounded by the scoring threshold

  • Licensee would then develop the detailed mission narrative based on NRC's input.

Potential Path 3: Licensee-Developed Inspection-Specific Exercise Scenario

  • NRC would review licensee protective strategy and site-specific conditions.
  • NRC would select target set, attack vector, DBT attributes, and any other necessary starting conditions.

- Conditions would be bounded by scoring threshold.

  • Licensee would develop the detailed mission narrative based on the NRC's input.

- Licensee development of the narrative as opposed to MAF director in current process.

Key Messages

  • Per the requirements of the Atomic Energy Act, the NRC FOF inspection program will mitigate potential conflicts of interest that could influence the results of the exercise.
  • The options under consideration can still change as internal and external feedback is assessed.
  • The NRC will engage with internal and external stakeholders to develop any necessary inspection and implementation guidance following the Commission decision.

Questions?