ML25132A176

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Standardization Recommendations for License Renewal Applications
ML25132A176
Person / Time
Issue date: 05/12/2025
From: Mark Yoo
NRC/NRR/DNRL/NLRP
To:
References
Download: ML25132A176 (1)


Text

Standardization Recommendations for License Renewal Applications Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Division of New and Renewed Licenses License Renewal Projects Branch May 2025

1 Table of Contents 1.

Background...........................................................................................................................2 2.

Formatting of the Application.................................................................................................4 2.1 Scoping and Screening Sections...................................................................................4 2.2 Table 1s: Formatting......................................................................................................5 2.3 Table 2s: Formatting......................................................................................................5 2.4 AMP and TLAA Summary Table....................................................................................6 2.5 Appendix A Commitments Table...................................................................................7 3.

RAI Responses and Supplements: Formatting.....................................................................7 3.1 General..........................................................................................................................7 3.2 Changes to Table 2s......................................................................................................8 3.3 Changes to Table 1s......................................................................................................8 3.4 Changes to the AMP and TLAA Summary Table..........................................................9 3.5 Changes to Appendix A Commitments..........................................................................9

2

===1.

Background===

To improve the efficiency of the license renewal review process, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff developed the License Renewal Roadmap in SECY-24-0026, Achieving Timely Completion of License Renewal Safety and Environmental Reviews (License Renewal Roadmap) (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS Accession No. ML24059A131) and SECY-24-0026A (ML24101A364).

The License Renewal Roadmap describes the staffs goal to conduct timely and predictable initial and subsequent license renewal reviews within 18 months, while reducing resources and providing reasonable assurance of adequate protection of public health and safety.

As described in SECY-24-0026, Appendix D, Historical and Current Efforts to Streamline License Renewal Safety Reviews, the staff is implementing a 3-phase approach to improve its efficiency and timeliness. Phase 1, Process Improvements and Phase 3, Additional Process Improvements, feature the modernization efforts related to the NRCs internal tool, the Technical Review Package (TRP) Tool. As indicated in Figure 1, the TRP Tool processes license renewal applications and bundles the items into numerous work assignments for the safety review.

Figure 1: Purpose of the TRP Tool Figure 2: License Renewal Roadmap - Safety Review: 3-Phase Approach

3 Phases 1 and 2 of the TRP Tool Modernization Effort improved the stabilization, user experience, and timeliness of the review process. In particular, Phase 1 involved stabilizing an antiquated system by remedying interruptions previously caused by system failures and unreliable networks. Phase 2 introduces automatically processing PDF submissions, which reduces the reliance on manual processing to input data. This new feature is expected to contribute to the efficiency, accuracy, and timeliness of making work assignments.

Standardizing application tables, nomenclature, and changes allows for automatic processing of the submittal. While standardization is not a requirement, it contributes to a more efficient staff review.

In order to fully leverage the automation feature of the TRP Tool, this guide provides the staffs recommendations for the standardization of initial and subsequent license renewal applications (LRAs/SLRAs). Applications that do not meet the standardization recommendations will require additional manual processing.

The recommendations were discussed at a public meeting conducted on February 12, 2025 (ML25063A179). Comments that were provided during the meeting have been considered in the development of these recommendations.

4 2.

Formatting of the Application 2.1 Scoping and Screening Sections a) Consistent numbering of the Section 2 subsections will allow the TRP Tool to automatically generate Scoping and Screening (S/S) packages.

b) The TRP tool will make S/S assignments based the following section numbering in the Table of Contents:

i.

2.1 ii.

2.2 iii.

2.3.X.Y-2.3.X.Z (All mechanical subheadings) iv.

2.4.X.Y-2.4.X.Z (All structural subheadings) v.

2.5.X.Y-2.5.X.Z (All electrical subheadings) vi.

2.X (All subheadings following 2.5 (If applicable))

c)

Figure 3 is an example of the Table of Contents for Section 2, Scoping and Screening.

Figure 3: Table of Contents, Section 2, Scoping and Screening 2.1 Scoping and Screening Methodology XX.XX-X 2.1.X (Subtitle)

XX.XX-X 2.1.Y (Subtitle)

XX.XX-X 2.2 Plant Level Scoping Results XX.XX-X 2.3 Scoping and Screening Results: Mechanical XX.XX-X 2.3.X (System/Component Category)

XX.XX-X 2.3.X.Y (Mechanical System Name)

XX.XX-X 2.3.X.Z (Mechanical System Name)

XX.XX-X 2.3.Y (System/Component Category)

XX.XX-X 2.3.Y.Y (Mechanical System Name)

XX.XX-X 2.3.Y.Z (Mechanical System Name)

XX.XX-X 2.4 Scoping and Screening Results: Structural XX.XX-X 2.4.X (System/Component Category)

XX.XX-X 2.4.X.Y (Structural System Name)

XX.XX-X 2.4.X.Z (Structural System Name)

XX.XX-X 2.4.Y (System/Component Category)

XX.XX-X 2.4.Y.Y (Structural System Name)

XX.XX-X 2.4.Y.Z (Structural System Name)

XX.XX-X 2.5 Scoping and Screening Results: Electrical XX.XX-X 2.5.X (System/Component Category)

XX.XX-X 2.5.X.Y (Electrical System Name)

XX.XX-X 2.5.X.Z (Electrical System Name)

XX.XX-X 2.5.Y (System/Component Category)

XX.XX-X 2.5.Y.Y (Electrical System Name)

XX.XX-X 2.5.Y.Z (Electrical System Name)

XX.XX-X 2.X (Add sections after 2.5 as Needed)

XX.XX-X

5 2.2 Table 1s: Formatting a) Format item numbers with dashes X.X.X-XX (rather than X.X.X.XX or X.X.X, XX).

b) For automatic identification by the TRP Tool, ensure consistent titling of Table 1s.

c)

For fewer errors, maintain consistency in column headings and column order.

d) Figure 4 is an example for Table 1s.

Figure 4: Formatting Table 1s 2.3 Table 2s: Formatting a) For simple identification by the TRP Tool, ensure consistent titling of Table 2s.

b) For fewer errors, maintain consistency in column headings and order.

c)

AMR ID column will be a numeric ID to individually designate lines in the Table 2s (an AMR ID will be unique to the corresponding line within the application).

i.

This allows the TRP Tool to identify and make correct edits when processing Supplements/RAI Responses.

ii.

Supplements/RAI Responses that include a new AMR will have a new AMR ID, and the Tool will be able to distinguish that line as new to the application.

iii.

AMR IDs cannot be reused in an application even if the corresponding line has been previously deleted via Supplement/RAI Responses.

iv.

The AMR ID allows for automatic RAI Responses/Supplement processing.

d) Each different combination of component/material/aging effect will be split out into an individual line.

i.

Multiple functions for a component on one line is acceptable (i.e.,

pressure boundary and structural support).

ii.

Multiple AMPs to manage one aging effect on one line is acceptable (i.e.,

Water Chemistry and One-Time Inspection). Lack of aggregation will help the TRP Tool to read lines accurately and consistently.

e) Table title cell and column headers should be present on every applicable page (i.e.:

if continued from the previous page, the table title and column headers will appear again)

6 f)

Text below the Table 2s (if the table is continued to the next page) should be limited to the page number. This prevents the tool from reading extra text as part of the Table 2s.

g) Figure 5 is an example for Table 2s.

Figure 5: Formatting Table 2s 2.4 AMP and TLAA Summary Table a) To aid the assignment of AMPs and TLAAs, a new table is recommended.

b) The table should be added to the end of Section 1 of the application.

c)

Use of the NUREG-2191 Number Column:

i.

If there is a corresponding GALL-SLR AMP, the designator (i.e.: XI.M20) would appear in this column.

ii.

If there is no corresponding GALL-SLR AMP, Plant Specific would appear in this column.

iii.

If it is a TLAA, TLAA would appear in this column.

d) Figure 6 is an example of a Summary Table.

Figure 6: Summary Table

7 2.5 Appendix A Commitments Table a) The header (including title cell) and column names should appear on each page of the Commitments Table.

b) If possible, embedded images/tables should be avoided in the Commitments Table.

c)

Numbering should be used in the implementation schedule block to indicate different implementation times for different portions of the AMP.

d) Figure 7 is an example for an Appendix A Commitments Table. Text levels shown in the Commitment column in Figure 7 should be utilized.

Figure 7: FSAR Commitments Table 3.

RAI Responses and Supplements: Formatting 3.1 General a) The TRP Tool cannot distinguish between text colors.

b) Changed - preceding the AMR ID (or the Table 1 item number) will show the result of the changes made in the Supplement/RAI response. This indicates to the TRP tool to replace all data associated with that AMR ID with what is in this line of the supplement. That means that this line must show a complete version of what should be associated with the line after the changes that have been made (all data in all columns are complete). This allows the supplement/RAI response to show the end result of the change(s).

c)

Lines starting with New - should be associated with an AMR ID that was not previously used in the application.

d) Deletions are detected by the tool using the Deleted - format, with all following cells left blank.

e) Deleted AMR IDs should not be reused in future Supplements/RAI responses.

f)

Table titles and column heading cells should appear in Supplements/RAI responses.

g) If tables are deleted, table numbers should not be reused. Tables should be deleted by applying the Deleted - format for each line in the table.

3.2 Changes to Table 2s a) Figure 8 shows the recommended formatting for changes to Table 2s. The changes depicted are:

8 i.

AMR 12345 is changed, adding new text and deleting old text from the Component field. The Changed - 12345 shows the final line following the changes.

ii.

AMR 12346 is a new AMR L/I. 12346 would not be an ID in the initial application previously. The New - designator would indicate creation of a new TRP line item.

iii.

AMR 12344 is deleted. The Deleted - 12344 row with blank cells tells the TRP Tool to remove the data for that AMR line item.

Figure 8: Changes to Table 2s 3.3 Changes to Table 1s a) Figure 9 shows a change to the Component column to a Table 1.

b) Changes should mimic the formatting of changes to Table 2s.

Figure 9: Changes to Table 1s 3.4 Changes to the AMP and TLAA Summary Table a) Figure 10 shows the recommended format for example changes to the AMP and TLAA Summary Table of an LRA/SLRA. This figure shows:

i.

The deletion of AMP XX.XX.

ii.

The addition of a plant-specific AMP.

iii.

The addition of a TLAA.

9 b) In Figure 10, the line beginning with Deleted - shows that AMP XX.XX has been deleted. The lines beginning with New - add a plant-specific AMP and a TLAA to the application. The TRP Tool will keep track of items in this table via the Appendix A designation in this table.

Figure 10: Changes to the Summary Table 3.5 Changes to Appendix A Commitments a) Figure 11 shows the recommended formatting for changes to the Appendix A Commitments Table. It shows additions and deletions to the wording of Commitment 1.

b) The TRP Tool would replace the data for Commitment 1 with what is in the row starting with Changed - 1.

Figure 11: Changes to Appendix A Commitments