ML25118A306
| ML25118A306 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/02/2025 |
| From: | Stacy Prasad Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response |
| To: | |
| References | |
| RG.5.74 | |
| Download: ML25118A306 (1) | |
Text
Regulatory Guide Periodic Review Regulatory Guide Number: 5.74
Title:
Managing the Safety/Security Interface Office:
NSIR/DPCP/RPPB Technical Lead:
Stacy Prasad Recommended Staff Action: Reviewed with no issues identified
- 1. What are the known technical or regulatory issues with the current version of the Regulatory Guide (RG)?
There are no known technical or regulatory issues with the current RG. The current version provides sufficient guidance to licensees to assess and manage their safety and security program activities in a manner that ensures that there are no adverse impacts on safety and security activities as required by 10 CFR 73.58.
- 2. What is the impact on internal and external stakeholders of not updating the RG for the known issues, in terms of anticipated numbers of licensing and inspection activities over the next several years?
No impact on stakeholders not updating the RG at this time. Licensees may use the information in this RG for actions that do not require NRC review and approval (such as changes to a facility design under 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Tests, and Experiments.)
Licensees may also use the information in this RG or applicable parts to resolve regulatory or inspection issues.
- 3. What is an estimate of the level of effort needed to address identified issues in terms of full-time equivalent (FTE) and contractor resources?
There are no identified issues; therefore, no need for FTE or contractor resources.
- 4. Based on the answers to the questions above, what is the staff action for this guide There is no planned action for updating this regulatory guide at this time; therefore, there will not be any need for FTE or contractor resources.
- 5. Provide a conceptual plan and timeframe to address the issues identified during the review.
The staff concludes that the document is acceptable as is. There is no need for a plan to address issues.
Note: This review was conducted in April 2025 and reflects the staffs plans as of that date. These plans are tentative and subject to change.