ML25063A245

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
March 4 2025 Letter to J Wood Re Washington Periodic Meeting Scheduling Letter and Agenda
ML25063A245
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/04/2025
From: Farrah Gaskins
Decommissioning, ISFSI, and Reactor Health Physics Branch
To: Jeffery Wood
State of WA, Dept of Health
References
Download: ML25063A245 (1)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 475 ALLENDALE ROAD, SUITE 102 KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-1415 Jill Wood, Director Office of Radiation Protection Washington Department of Health P.O. Box 47827 Olympia, WA 98504-7827

SUBJECT:

WASHINGTON PERIODIC MEETING SCHEDULING LETTER AND AGENDA

Dear Jill:

To help the Agreement States and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) remain knowledgeable of each others program and to initiate planning for the next Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program (IMPEP) review, the NRC conducts one-day periodic meetings with Agreement States in between IMPEP reviews.

In accordance with the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards (NMSS) Procedure SA-116, Periodic Meetings between IMPEP Reviews, and after previous coordination with you and your staff, we have scheduled the periodic meeting for April 15, 2025. The meeting will be held at the Radiation Control Program offices in Olympia, Washington.

Based on our previous discussions, the likely topics for discussion at the meeting are listed on the enclosed agenda. If there are any additional specific topics you would like to cover, or if you would like to focus on a specific area, please let me know. If you have any questions, please call me at 610-337-5143, or via email at Farrah.Gaskins@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, Farrah C. Gaskins Regional State Agreements Officer Division of Nuclear Materials Safety

Enclosure:

Washington Periodic Meeting Agenda March 4, 2025 Signed by Gaskins, Farrah on 03/04/25

Periodic Meeting Agenda with Washington Department of Health April 15, 2025 Topic areas for discussion during the meeting may include:

1.

Program reorganizations:

Discuss any changes to the program organization, including program/staff relocations and new appointments.

2.

Changes in program budget/funding.

3.

Status of the NRC or States program, including:

a.

Technical Staffing and Training i)

Number of staff in the program and status of their training and qualifications.

ii)

Any program vacancies.

iii) Staff turnover since the last IMPEP review.

iv) Adequacy of FTEs for the materials program.

v)

Status of implementation of IMC 1248 Recommendation: Washington should review, revise, and update the training and qualification requirements for all aspects of its Agreement State Program to ensure the essential objectives of the IMC 1248 appendices A, B, E, H, and I are adopted.

b.

Status of Materials Inspection Program i)

Number of Priority 1, 2, and 3 inspections completed on time and overdue since the last IMPEP review.

ii)

Number of initial inspections completed on time and overdue since the last IMPEP review.

iii) Number of reciprocity inspections completed each year since the last IMPEP.

iv) Inspection frequencies (changes to or those that differ from NRCs inspection frequencies).

Recommendation: Perform a root cause analysis of the cause for overdue inspections and provide a list of corrective actions with a schedule to complete the implementation of the corrective actions within 6 months.

Recommendation: Implement an effective management tool to track the status of the inspection program. Include a schedule of actions to complete implementation within 6 months.

c.

Technical Quality of Inspections i)

Status of inspector accompaniments.

ii)

Management review process iii) Significant inspection activities/challenges

d.

Technical Quality of Licensing Actions i)

Number of licensing actions and types performed since the last IMPEP review.

Recommendation: Washington should revise their licensing procedure to be compatible with NRCs NUREG-1556 licensing guidance and to include a periodic assessment or audit to ensure proper issuance of licenses in accordance with the appropriate NUREG-1556 volume.

Recommendation: Washington develop and implement a process to ensure that financial assurance mechanisms are received and maintained for each licensee subject to financial assurance, and that the mechanisms meet the criteria of NRCs NUREG-1757, Volume 3, Revision 1, Financial Assurance, Recordkeeping, and Timeliness. Perform an assessment to identify issues with financial assurance with existing licenses.

e.

Technical Quality of Incident and Allegation Activities i)

Status of allegations and concerns referred by the NRC for action.

ii)

Significant events and generic implications.

iii) Number of reportable events received since the last IMPEP and event reporting, including follow-up and closure information in NMED.

Recommendation: Washington should revise its allegation and incident procedures to include necessary follow-up actions (e.g., ensure proper and complete documentation of the closure of incidents and allegations, ensure that follow-up inspections are scheduled and completed, ensure that management is consulted in follow-up and closure activities), and to assure that the updated procedures are implemented and followed.

Recommendation: Washington should locate all allegation records received during the review period and assess whether appropriate closure actions were taken; and verify that the allegation files were complete, accurate, and documented in the tracking system, including management oversight and approval of any audits of the electronic allegation files and tracking system.

f.

Legislation, Regulations, and Other Program Elements, if applicable i.

Regulations a.

Compatibility requirements b.

Discuss status of States regulations and actions to keep regulations up to date, including the use of legally binding requirements and sunset requirements.

ii.

Legislative changes affecting the program.

iii. Sunset Requirements iv. Other Program Elements Recommendation: Washington should perform a review of all their license conditions, identify non-standard license conditions, and submit the non-standard license conditions to the NRC for a compatibility review.

g.

Sealed Source and Device (SS&D) Evaluation Program, if applicable i)

Technical Staffing and Training a.

Number of qualified SS&D reviewers and their signature authority.

b.

Number of current or anticipated program vacancies.

c.

Staff turnover since the last IMPEP review.

ii)

Technical Quality of the Product Evaluation Program a.

Number of cases since the last IMPEP review to include new cases, amendments, inactivations and transfers.

iii) Evaluation of Defects and Incidents Regarding SS&Ds a.

Any cases noted involving manufacturing defects since the last IMPEP review?

h.

Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Program (LLRW), if applicable i)

Technical Staffing and Training ii)

LLRW Status of the Inspection Program iii) LLRW Technical Quality of Inspections iv) LLRW Technical Quality of Licensing v)

LLRW Technical Quality of Incident and Allegation Activities Recommendation: Washington should review, revise, and update the training and qualification requirements for all aspects of its Agreement State Program to ensure the essential objectives of the IMC 1248 appendices A, B, E, H, and I are adopted.

i.

Uranium Recovery Program (UR), if applicable i)

Technical Staffing and Training ii)

UR Status of the Inspection Program iii) UR Technical Quality of Inspections iv) UR Technical Quality of Licensing v)

UR Technical Quality of Incident and Allegation Activities Recommendation: Washington should review, revise, and update the training and qualification requirements for all aspects of its Agreement State Program to ensure the essential objectives of the IMC 1248 appendices A, B, E, H, and I are adopted.

4.

Information Exchange:

a.

Current program initiatives; b.

Emerging technologies; c.

Large, complicated, or unusual authorizations for use of radioactive materials; d.

Major decommissioning and license termination actions; e.

Mechanisms to evaluate performance such as self-audits; f.

Operating/strategic plan metrics and outcomes, if applicable; and, g.

Current NRC initiatives.

5.

Schedule for the next IMPEP review. (~April 2026)

6.

Next Steps/Meeting Summary/Q&A.

7.

Exit with Senior Management.

ML25063A245 OFFICE R-I/DNMS NAME FGaskins DATE Mar 4, 2025