ML25030A276

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
10-Public Forms
ML25030A276
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  
(NPF-087, NPF-089)
Issue date: 10/31/2024
From:
NRC/RGN-IV/DORS/OB
To:
Vistra Operations Company
References
Download: ML25030A276 (1)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER Chief: Kirkland Facility: CP 10/31/2024 U/I: Start of Op Test: 10/21/2024 10/26/2024 Due Date Date Complete Initials 2/19/2024 1/18/2024 3/25/2024 1/18/2024 3/25/2024 1/18/2024 3/25/2024 8/22/2024 3/25/2024 2/28/2024 4/8/2024 3/5/2024 5/20/2024 5/20/2024 6/3/2024 5/24/2024 7/15/2024 N/A N/A 8/5/2024 8/12/2024 8/19/2024 N/A N/A 9/2/2024 8/16/2024 9/16/2024 9/4/2024 9/16/2024 9/9/2024 9/16/2024 9/16/2024 9/23/2024 9/18/2024 9/30/2024 9/30/2024 10/7/2024 10/7/2024 10/14/2024 10/15/2024 10/14/2024 N/A N/A 10/14/2024 10/15/2024 10/14/2024 9/16/2024 10/14/2024 10/16/2024 10/21/2024 10/21/2025 11/9/2024 11/8/2025 11/20/2024 11/8/2025 11/28/2024 11/15/2025 11/28/2024 12/2/2025 12/5/2024 12/2/2025 12/12/2024 12/2/2025 12/19/2024 N/A N/A 12/19/2024 12/5/2025 12/19/2024 12/5/2025 1/9/2025 N/A N/A 1/16/2025 1/15/2025 1/23/2025 N/A N/A Rev. 12 Examiner's document op test results on ES 303's Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 12, Forms 2.1-1 and 5.1-1 Post exam operating test comments reviewed and ES-303-1 updated Signed ES 303's to BC produced by CE License/Proposed Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of results Ref Mat'l Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals Examination Report Issued 21 days after proposed denial letters mailed. Post exam comments and graded exams received Final Denial Letters mailed (if no request for informal review) RPS/IP number of examinees updated print Report-21 Waivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decision Post exam written comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC grading completed Chief examiner review of operating test and/or written exam grading completed Branch Chief review of exam results completed Date of Written Exam: Description Notes Examination administration date confirmed For NRC prepared exams, arrangements made for the facility to submit reference materials End of Op Test: Written Exam Developed By: NRC / Facility Operating Test Developed By: NRC / Facility Examination review results discussed between NRC and facility licensee NRC examiners and facility contact assigned Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due Forms 1.3-1, 2.3-1, 3.2-1, 3.2-2, 3.4-1, 3.3-1 Reference material due for NRC prepared exams ES-2.1.F Corporate Notification Letter sent Letter 2.1-1 produced by CE NRC developed written examination outline sent to facility contact Forms 4.1-BWR/PWR and COMMON Approved scenarios and JPMs distributed to examiners BC signs Exam Approval Letter (Form 2.3-1) Operating test outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee Form 2.3-1 signed by CE & BC Peer review of written exam complete Form 2.3-5 Proposed exams, outlines, supporting documentation, and reference materials due. Written exam and operating test reviews completed Document review on Forms 2.3-1 and 2.3-5 NRC-prepared examinations approved by the NRC supervisor and forwarded for facility licensee review Feedback approved by Branch Chief Final applications reviewed and audited; exam approval and waiver/excusal letters sent On-site validation & 10% audit of qual cards Administer Operating Test Preliminary license applications & waiver/excusal requests due NRC Forms 398/396 Final license applications & waiver/excusal requests due Form 2.2-1 Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee Preliminary license applications and waivers reviewed Facility licensee management feedback on the examination requested by the NRC supervisor Written exams and operating tests approved by Branch Chief

Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Facility: GPNPP Units 1 and 2 Date of Examination: October 2024 Item Task Description (Y)es / {N)o a-2 c#

a. The outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with the y

l-/ z Instructions In Section B of ES-4.1, and all knowledge and ability (KIA) categories are ~ appropriately sampled. a'.

b. The outline does not overamohasize anv svstems evolutions or aeneric tooics.

y y y s:

c. Justifications for deselected or reiacted KIA statements are acceotable.

y y y

a. Using Form 3.4-1, Events and Evolutions Checklist, verify that the proposed scenario set contains the required number of nom1al evolutions, reactivity evolutions, Instrument y

y y and component failures, manual control evolutions, technical specifications, and major transients. 0::

b. There are enough scenarios (and spares) for the projected number and mix of 0

~ applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule y y y without compromising exam integrity. Ensure that scenarios will not be repeated on

ii; subseouent davs.

en

c. Ensure that all scenarios ara new or slgn\1\cantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4 and that no scenarios are duplicated from the aoollcants' audit test(s).

y y '(

d. To the extent possible, assBSS whether the outllne(s) conforms with the qualitative *and y

y V quantitative simulator set criteria specified on Form 2.3-2.

a. Verify that the administrative outline meats the criteria specified in the instructions on y

y y Form 3.2-1 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s}. Cl)

b. Verify that the control room and in-plant systems outline meets the criteria specified in y

y ~ the instructions on Form 3.2-2 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' y

a.

audit testis\.

c. Determine whether the number of job perfom1ance measures {JPMs) and JPM types is y

y y sufficient for the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duollcated on subseauent davs.

a. Assess whether the appropriate exam sections cover plant-specific priorities (including y

y

  • 1 probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination Insights).
b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 10 CFR 55.43, and 10 CFR 55.45 sampling is y

y y ..J

1nnmririate.

~

c. Check whether KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are greater y

y y w z than or eaual to 2.5. w y y 'i C)

d. Check for duolication end overlan across the exam and with the last two NRC exams.
e. Check the entire exam for balance of coveraae.

y y 'I

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level {reactor operator or senior y

y y reactor ooerator). Printed Na~~ i lure Date e.. Author Jason Smith / c:J J.tA L_1 A k , of i.l ~

b.

Facility Reviewer (*} Anton Malsam / a ' ~ ~ J lo-:z.. ;a~

c.

NRC Reviewer (#) John Kirklan.9/vj?C r'-'f ~ 1-> _/ 10/15/24 NRC Chief Examiner John Kirkla~d.JC1.,,L(_ 1/4 * ~

.,.,, (;

/J // 10/15/24 NRC Supervisor Heather Ge.. ~ r,~/ k/lo//:.~;/y.4-hf,P"f 10/15/24 I I ./ / .. The facility licensee slgnature ls not applicable for NRe=clevelope= *t s.

  1. An lnderrendent NRC reviewer performs the steps In oolumn "c."

may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the outf ne under review,

Form 2.3-2 Operating rest Quality Chec_klist Facilitv: CPNPP Units 1 and 2 Date of Examination: October 2024 Ooeratirn:i Test Number. CP-2024-10 General Criteria (Y)es/ (N o a b* ri'

a.

The operating test meets the criteria on the associated test outline. y y y

b.

There are enough test Items so that test items will not be repeated on more than 1 day of y y 'I the operating test C. The operating test does not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). y y y

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is y y y minimized.

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and y y y less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. Walkthrough Criteria

a.

Each job performance measure (JPM) includes the following, as applicable: y y y task standard . initial conditions . initiating cues . references and tools, Including associated procedures . reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion} and specific designation If the facility licensee deems It to be time critical . alternate path JPMs are labeled as "alternate path* operationally important specific performance criteria that Include the following: detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing lmportsnt observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the JPM task standard identification of critical steps and their associated perfonnance standards restrictions on the SAClUence of steps, if aoolicable

b.

Ensure that any changes from the previously approved JPM outlines (Forms 3.2-1 and 3.2-2) y y y have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms. Simulator Scenario Set Criteria for Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3/4 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be y

y ~ out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

y y v

3.

Each event description consists of the following: y y 'I the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to Initiate the event the symptoms/cues that Will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (continued) (Y)es I (N)o a b* c#

4.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thennodynamics. y y '-I

5.

The sequencing and tlming of events is reasonable and alows the examination team to y y y observe and evaluate applicant performance.

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

y y Operators have sufficient lime to cany out expected activities without undue time y constraints. Cues are given.

7.

The simulator modeling is not altered. y y y

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator y y y perfonnance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Scenarios are new or significantly modified In accordance with ES-3.4. y y 'f

10. Scenarios (as grouped) allow each applicant to be significantly Involved In the minimum y

y y number of transients, events, and evolutions specified on the version of Form 3.4--1 submitted with the scenario set.

11. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks aaoss y

y y scenarios, when possible.

12. The level of difficulty Is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each craw position.

y y V Actual Attributes by (Y)es I (N)o TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES per Scenario (See ES-3.4) Scenario No. 1/2/314 a b* C#

1.

Malfunctions after emergency operating procedure (EOP) 3/3/2/3 y y y entry (1-2)

2.

Abnormal events (2-4) 4 / 3 / 4 / 4* y y 'I

3.

Major transients (1-2) 1/1/1/1 y y y

4.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions {1-2) 2/2/2/2 y y y

5.

Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions 0/1/1/0 y y v ~ 1 per scenario set; set is the entire set of scenarlos prepared for the scheduled exam)

6.

Preidentified critical tasks (~ 2) 2/2 /2/3 y y I/ ~ rinted Nan c Date

a.

Author Jason Smith/ I A A.. I ()'1 J "2.4 (I~ - l "--c-~/'.... I '

b. Facility Reviewer(*}

Anton Malsam/ I"- '2,.. 2'-\ ~ (A'rc.:-'~ - C. NRG Reviewer(#) John Kirkland 1 10/15/24 John KirklandV #<'T!-'-../ 4 /7 10/15/24 NRC Chief Examiner NRC Supervisor He~e C-..,,-v,Y,~/4A'/£/4&7£:L/ 10/15/24

  • The facility licensee signature is not aooli

'./. ~ RC-d~16ioped tests. 1

  1. An independent NRG reviewer perfonns the steps in col n c. This may be the NRG Chief Examiner if he/she did not develoo the oooratino test under review.

Form 2.3-4 Written Examination Quality ChE!cklist Facility: Comanche Peak Date of Exam: 10-21-2024 Exam Level: RO !XI SRO IZl Item Description (Y)es I (N)o a b* c#-

1.

Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to -the facility. Each question y y y includes a technical reference.

2.
a. All questions reference NRC knowledge and abilities (K/As) requirements.
b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

y y

c. All questions include an explanation of the correct answer explanation and a distractor

'-( analysis.

3.

Senior reactor operator (SRO) questions test at the SRO license level. y y y

4.

The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than four reactor operator (RO) or two SRO questions were repeated from the last two NRC licensing exams, including full y y y (100-question) retake examinations, consult the NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ooerator licensino oroaram office.)

5.

Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: _ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed. ~ The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started. y y y _ The examinations were developed independently. _ The licensee certifies that there is no duplication. Other (explain):

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the bank, at least Bank Modified New y y y 10% new (at the comprehension/analysis level), and the rest new or 34/,t modified); enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution > 2!r,. 20/3 '/"141 y y (

7.

Between 38 and 45 questions of the questions on the RO exam and Memory C/A y y ~ at least 13 of the questions on the SRO-only portion of the exam are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual 37/J j;__ 38/ y y y RO/SRO-only question distribution > 1'i 2t'J 11

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors. y y y

9.

Question content conforms to specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination y y y outline and is appropriate for the KIA statements' assigned tier; deviations are iustified.

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the instructions and guidelines in ES-4.2.

y y y 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple-choice items; the total is correct y y y and agrees with the value on the cover sheet. Prilnted Name/Signature Date

a. Author Scott Dimeler C$t0~.

I \) r "l r 2'f

b.

Facility Reviewer (*) Anton Malsam ( ;' 1\ ~ ~/(,, \O-J_ *21{ NRC Reviewer (#) John Kirkland qt,L~.~ 10/15/24 C. NRC Chief Examiner John Kirklandia,l,< -it: v,t;?' 10/15/24 NRC Regional Supervisor Heather r..,,.ofo~/.11}~4~ 1 ~1krA 10/15/24

  • The facility licensee signature is n6fapplfcable ir~

r

  • -develo~ttrntesti. I
  1. An independent NRC reviewer performs steps-i column c. T)J' may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the written examination under review.

Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist RO I U RX 0 1 0/1 1 0/1 0 NOR 0 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 3 2 3/2 4 2/2 2 MAJ 1 1 1/1 2 1/1 1 Man. Ctrl 0 1 0/1 1 0/1 0 TS 2 2 0 2 2 RX 0 1 0/1 1 0/1 0 NOR 0 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 3 2 3/2 4 2/2 2 MAJ 1 1 1/1 2 1/1 1 Man. Ctrl 0 1 0/1 1 0/1 0 TS 2 2 0 2 2 RX 0 0 1 0/0 1 0/1 0 NOR 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 3 3 3 3/3 4 2/2 2 MAJ 1 1 1 1/1 2 1/1 1 Man. Ctrl 0 2 2 0/2 1 0/1 0 TS 2 2 0 2 2 RX 0 0 1 0/0 1 0/1 0 NOR 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 3 3 3 3/3 4 2/2 2 MAJ 1 1 1 1/1 2 1/1 1 Man. Ctrl 0 2 2 0/2 1 0/1 0 TS 2 2 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1/1 1 1/0 0 NOR 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 I/C 2 4 3 2/4 4 2/2 2 MAJ 1 1 1 1/1 2 1/1 1 Man. Ctrl 1 0 0 1/0 1 1/0 0 TS 2 2 2 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1/1 1 1/0 0 NOR 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 I/C 2 4 3 2/4 4 2/2 2 MAJ 1 1 1 1/1 2 1/1 1 Man. Ctrl 1 0 0 1/0 1 1/0 0 TS 2 2 2 0 2 2 S R O SRO-I11 S R O A T C B O P SRO-I9 S R O A T C B O P S R O A T C SRO-I1 SRO-I3 SRO-I5 SRO-I7 B O P Facility: CPNPP 1 and 2 Date of Exam: 8/21/24-8/31/24 Operating Test No.: CP-2024-10 A P P L I C A N T E V E N T T Y P E Scenarios 1 2 3 4 (SPARE) T O T A L M I N I M U M A T C B O P POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION

Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist RO I U RX 1 1 1/1 1 1/0 0 NOR 0 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 4 4 4/4 4 2/2 2 MAJ 1 1 1/1 2 1/1 1 Man. Ctrl 2 0 2/0 1 1/0 0 TS 3 3 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1/1 1 1/0 0 NOR 0 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 4 4 4/4 4 2/2 2 MAJ 1 1 1/1 2 1/1 1 Man. Ctrl 2 0 2/0 1 1/0 0 TS 3 3 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1/1 1 1/0 0 NOR 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 I/C 4 4 3 4/4 4 2/2 2 MAJ 1 1 1 1/1 2 1/1 1 Man. Ctrl 2 0 0 2 1 1/0 0 TS 2 2 2 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1/1 1 1/0 0 NOR 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 I/C 4 4 3 4/4 4 2/2 2 MAJ 1 1 1 1/1 2 1/1 1 Man. Ctrl 2 0 0 2 1 1/0 0 TS 2 2 2 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1/1 1 0/1 0 NOR 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 I/C 4 3 4 4/3 4 2/2 2 MAJ 1 1 1 1/1 2 1/1 1 Man. Ctrl 0 1 1 0/1 1 0/1 0 TS 3 3 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1/1 1 0/1 0 NOR 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 I/C 4 3 4 4/3 4 2/2 2 MAJ 1 1 1 1/1 2 1/1 1 Man. Ctrl 0 1 1 0/1 1 0/1 0 TS 3 3 0 2 2 POSITION S R O B O P Facility: CPNPP 1 and 2 Date of Exam: 8/21/24-8/31/24 Operating Test No.: CP-2024-10 A P P L I C A N T E V E N T T Y P E Scenarios 1 SRO-I2 SRO-I4 SRO-I6 2 3 4 (SPARE) T O T A L M I N I M U M POSITION POSITION POSITION S R O A T C B O P SRO-I8 B O P SRO-I10 A T C B O P S R O A T C S R O A T C SRO-I12

Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist RO I U RX 1 0 1 1 1 0 NOR 0 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 3 4 7 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 2 3 5 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2 RX 1 0 1 1 1 0 NOR 0 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 3 4 7 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 2 3 5 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 NOR 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 I/C 3 3 4 6 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 2 1 1 3 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 NOR 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 I/C 3 3 4 6 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 2 1 1 3 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2 RX 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 NOR 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 4 3 3 7 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 3 2 2 5 1 1 0 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 NOR 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 4 3 3 7 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctrl 3 2 2 5 1 1 0 TS 0 0 2 2 M I N I M U M POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION S R O B O P Facility: CPNPP 1 and 2 Date of Exam: 8/21/24-8/31/24 Operating Test No.: CP-2024-10 A P P L I C A N T E V E N T T Y P E Scenarios 1 2 3 4 (SPARE) T O T A L S R O A T C A T C B O P S R O A T C RO-5 RO-6 B O P RO-1 RO-2 RO-3 RO-4 S R O A T C B O P

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 07/01/2024 to 12/31/2024 Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 By Date

  1. Candidates Exam Start Exam End Site Docket #

Insp Rpt Cac # RO LSRO SROI SROU Type Exam Author Chief Examiner Examiner 10/20/2024 10/26/2024 Comanche Peak 05000445-1, 05000446-2 2024301 000500 6 0 10 0 FB-OR-INITIAL LICENSE EXAM ADMINISTRATI ON (EXAD) NFF

Kirkland, John Kirkland, John; Hernandez, Nick; Harrington, Chris; You, David; Clayton, Kelly Prepared on 1/30/2025 10:39:23 AM Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD Exam Author: ALL Orgs: ALL Sites: CP

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Region/Site Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 4 12 20 0 0 32 Region/Docket Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 4 12 20 0 0 32 Exam Date/Site Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 10/20/2024 12 20 0 0 32 Exam Date/Docket Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 10/20/2024 12 20 0 0 32 Prepared on 1/30/2025 10:39:23 AM Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD Exam Author: ALL Orgs: ALL Sites: CP

Form 1.3-1 Examination Security Agreement - N,R L. l-.C 3 () (1) Preexamination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 21-31 ocr24 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until the completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations, an enforcement action by the NRC against me or the facility licensee, or both. I will immediately report to facility licensee management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. (2) Postexamination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered duling the week(s) of 21-31 OCT 24 From the date that I entered into this examination seculity agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Print Name Job Title Signat4re (1) Date Si D<tui:.e (2) Date Note

1.

ScottDimeler Exam Author ~( .U. SMAR24 k, \ I u IO*il-Z. '1

2.

i>n.JTo,-l 1'1\IU"f\""' i=Ac..tL,1"'1-~ \ -t-z:: <[,, __ 11 Mf\t.1!-1 (,, ..,... l.._ LIO*"l.\*'H J-,-:c.,- !,, "T"c,,..,lo.,r-, C n Ii:~ ~ L- ~ ... -" A __..-.i._ 'l/ q/ ').,'-I

3.
4.

AC,\A L.SMi~/. ' El<Xm '"'".,/ ,~ {3NllfeVI 1 .. / J(/~. (6/: l ::.s'f

5.
  • nnr, ~,Lri, **, \4-M

-<~ '(....... "' 1'!1 11' ... 110 111'"'** 111., 11' ,,,-/,,. 7'. .{,,..,- ~ V ,, ~* >.. L.

  • "* L.
6.

~- cf'"'r'l,:::._

7.

'-77 ~IJ"\A i.':'.":11L..t.., Siz:.o:;, ~,~- ~ 'I. Iv.I I,,... r.,,.. -.. ft .,,u,...., ' 61<//. ,,._r.o,...... ~(

8.

.3 =--(- ,;/.,,/ 5-,~o /'£.,-.....,

  • .,/ dtl7,.,,q <'/9/ t. '(

/I,,,,,, i(I., '-'I V l

9.

1/.,/4.*...-+.--- , '.fl.,,, jf..,,,;> {'--5, 1-1,f,, ,I/ t1/cl21 . o.ff--~ A L-,-

10.
  • C,.(,-1-t J....:.,_!,

12.rr /;/,,.. ~I I .{_ f..l 7 _ r,_e.""' 'l*'f-;J..'I 1. '1r.-,t-*I ci~-J.. n-e, --~*J

11. _j-

.,~\., '"",....,t--..J.0:- r,,,v\ 4;,-- ~f{-</z.4 I '4P,IL"-" 11-'1-.:J<t c:.._,,.-.,. 1 A.. I.

12.

/I f p,,., r 'u,Jz,: - ~.t:~ J::fc' " /<;/1,<t -

13. _;,,,-,s-f,h $"1,-.,.d.

/?_o / .5/;i,J./--,,_ // IJ. ,;/,gfa., ~---' ~

11... i

-*~ r.,/ NOTES: 7 v I ComanchePeakLC30Exam1sscheduledfor21 31 OCT2024 /;

m en * ~ _c,, 7J !lJ cc CD 0, 8, 0, Form 1.3-1 Examination Security Agreement (1) Preexamination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRG) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of tl-!.f o t,i.~ as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until the completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations, an enforcement action by the NRC against me or the facility licensee, or both. I will immediately report to facility licensee management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. (2) Postexamination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) ofit-3i o,t-z~. From the date that I entered into this examination security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Print Name Job Title Signature (1) Date , Sign ~ture (2) Date Note

1.

M1tL-,f 11vL-

  • v~

/7-Z,,61/2 -s/z.,,h,c, ! l, ' _,,L /1.;k,,_ /1/5. *- r, ~-..,,)#'- -..... -

2.

,,,1, /,(1, L,.1.-"' ~o Ai'J""L s,w>z..'t ~:., ',,._ n * ,, l7 7 'f <:

  • I ti.' - i
3.

jof,1.- ".P,4M.P,.A.....J f!.o ).I,~ r/ fJ-J.u-;.lf II '".I.. 'J. !;d nn***.,e/ t, J,3 :;,; {;,,V I 'I. 1-.e/' -

4.

R'<llfV s~ LIS 7-~-2'{,

  • I'.. ~- \s,,, f,-4 ;,/..,

~~ L~{":'. ' .J ,I. ~-I

5.

L.......~- ,~, ~ >-~ 7/"'I I 2.'f,,. I.,, l,,..~ Ji I.?/.%v ~., -1,--- L

6.

iZ-~/lr,J L1f)~l<v/ 51..... -,/ 1 1--, IJJ1l-z.4, A wt,/.-,? -

N Viz~ "'

I v

7.

-:,~.,1,1;*n.-' ) i"l -r;.,\ - I,.!"~A,-,~-.._ (. l.u ,,, 1, o r.;,. /I 1/I.J J...<1

8.

R'i"" L,lv'""' V.,, M-/- 7-1,-z</I U.A, ~ &, J.. ,, f.f /ou &-- _,.. f'P- - e*

9.

Jou_ P1 * ** * = t-1 ~ / .J'a 1,-/l,-Z-{f,,.,,_ -/J I. /., ::s,;..,( ,.1~1~,, si"-~~i1fl!---

10.
z.Ji " ltv Ro t-../ I\.

7 -J3-1-4' 'IL~, ~ Fw 11/ql:H ~r..: - C..Jb....-:.....,

11. '. 1£Ssiut.. I ~_.win'UJnJ /?P !, '

,, l,,,r ~J.-~ 7-l.'~-"iL r/\....1, ~.- I 11 Gh:-f V I

12. -r.MISfJY( y,1ye,q.,n-v.S
~,"'T 7-30-,A'{ l '; /I'-

J.. 1'.- I. *1.,14,,.. ~ <-- I -~ **,

13.
...l~k,.. '

1'"1'1-- .G. t'I ',. g-:1,-~11 I. ~.,{µt !t,~1/j,lt V NOTES: V I C/

t
  • t i'l

. ' ( . --1 I

  • 1

~

"U., co CD a:, s, a:, Form 1.3-1 Examination Security Agreement fi/~C l. C :3C> {Z-02'-/) (1) Preexamination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledg~about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of l.1-:, I G"'-f""M; °M4he date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until the completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations, an enforcement action by the NRC against me or the facility licensee, or both. I will immediately report to facility licensee management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. (2) Postexamination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorize.s;I persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of,Jt-3/ C,at-4-fcifhYthe date that I entered into this examination security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Print Name Job Title Signat, re (1) Date Signature (2) Date Note

1.

--.""'v ;.., 1-(-,_.r J //.A"T ~--, ;,6- / I/ It /U['<of

  • v,,. =

t0 h./vt

2.

) lQ.,.-.1 r.. r r-t..o,,q-'~ b"' /./ 1-s-z..* L?'.,,,:;; /t/S/~e.

3.

i ~w..-1/_c,,12.(l..AS' LOtt.J-- I"--'~~ 0,-'>-?.>-{ II /5/t-'--( ~

4.

t_i,}"'- ';',-..-,:,P,,~A h~C,~ ;(.C/ ... ~ "1/;&/-1... ~ H 1;.. I, L -"11-.,_ It I 7 /.;?'f IC......i n-KL-L!_,,.. --

5.

j1r5otJ Pt!#V /2.0 -J 9111/z.'( _0 /I {,;/-;I/ IJ I

6.

l::i,.--......... D \(.0 ~-- <ot,-,1r'1 (

  • .,n I I t.,,J i'-1
7.

//. I.

  • ft/.*.I-. I

. '-- _/ - I ~ 10/e, 1 <.( 7'i /I ',II,.,. I ~=-

8.

/os!.. """" /,M-*,c,---r,.11.

a/If,, w lr/'f/21

~

9.

I... r... L?AA as I.. II "'-!, <.Af1r'Lll'i/'2 ,. "" :.! ¥.1:s tD/tll~'r r.. I '"1. '!,tJz_&/.

10.

~ *All'n,/)-,, 1At,,#) -,--; or :t:--/1/S-,--

fe--< J /tJ.;,.,., /_? /I "}'},. /,

./.../ I,/-, I I 1--4

11.

Cmm\~ L. 'jbt,rn!l,=1

r 1-J)--r P,c.-r

( ,7';,..,. /1)/11.l"'LI ll ' lof-s, G,E,

12.

I,. rt' \.tu, t An, ' 1 all 'IJ.J ID

  • t( !/,il. 1 I i < I.U

/) ii* J ' 'ffl-V 1'4-lrw,._,,,. I, '

13.

t,J I___,. L ' /J-, --=:J::(..,.~ ~ Y. i Ii,. '.. /~ ltn/.'.: 1 /-,,,,,, 1';?' L /,_,, ,o/'J,t/14 ~ ,~ NOTES: V [ I I

m en ~ w ""[J (0 (1) CXl Q, CXl Form 1.3-1 Examination Security Agreement NR. C, LC30 C 7.-0Z.4) (1) Preexamination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRG) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) oQf-J I OcftM bf the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRG chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until the completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRG. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations, an enforcement action by the NRG against me or the facility licensee, or both. I will immediately report to facility licensee management or the NRG chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. (2) Postexamination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unautho~iifed persons any information concerning the NRG licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of,;}J-3I Od.ol"'!=rom the date that I entered into this examination security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRG. Print Name Job Title Signature (1) Date ,. Signature (2J Date Note

1.

'J.1Av,p ~)C fur 1,-IJTYZ="- ~-) LO 10/tt/2.; aLlff. /1,J,., IL. I**~ 1,~-'- c-1~ --~/

2.

/ V

3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.

NOTES: cp-zoZ'-1-10}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML25030A276&oldid=5554286"