ML24347A050

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
11-27-2024 Email from D White to J Semancik Requesting Additional Information on Connecticut Final Agreement State Application
ML24347A050
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/27/2024
From: Duane White
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
To: Semancik J
State of CT, Dept of Energy and Environmental Protection
References
Download: ML24347A050 (1)


Text

From:

Duncan White To:

Semancik, Jeffrey Cc:

Graber, Brandon; Firsick, Michael; Huda Akhavannik; Jackson Barth (He/Him); Emma Duncan; Adelaide Giantelli; Farrah Gaskins (She/Her); Shawn Seeley

Subject:

Request for Additional Information Date:

Wednesday, November 27, 2024 12:00:50 PM Jeff:

As we discussed earlier today, we have completed our review of Connecticuts final application for an Agreement. We appreciate the programs effort to address the items in our comment letter for the draft application. However, there are a few items we need additional information.

1. The draft Agreement provided in Section 4.1 of the application did not follow standard language in Management Directive (MD) 5.8. We have attached a revised version of the Agreement that aligns with MD 5.8 and includes a signature block for the planned signing ceremony. In your response, please resubmit the revised version of the draft Agreement.
2. The discussion in procedures 900.2 and 900.3 regarding actions to be taken for expired licenses do not appear to be aligned. Please revise section 5.11.1.1 of procedure 900.3 to align with section 6.1.4 of procedure 900.2. Specifically, section 5.11.1.1 should serve as a continuation of section 6.1.4. In your response, please provide the revise section(s) to the procedure(s) you have updated and provide a commitment that these procedures have been updated with the revised section(s).
3. Please provide a list of radiation detection instrumentation possessed by program and a discussion of your overall program to ensure that sufficient radiation detection equipment is maintained calibrated and in good working order.

We also discussed the number of workdays used by Connecticut in your workload analysis and that you would evaluate the basis for the number of workdays. If you need to make any changes to your application because of this evaluation, please include those changes in your response.

We would appreciate your written response by the week of December 9. Please contact me if you have any questions.

Happy Thanksgiving, Duncan