ML24212A130
| ML24212A130 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palisades  |
| Issue date: | 07/29/2024 |
| From: | Jacobs K - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Administration |
| References | |
| NRC-2024-0076, 89FR53659 00070 | |
| Download: ML24212A130 (1) | |
Text
PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 7/30/24, 7:58 AM Received: July 29, 2024 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. lz7-c2ou-bvra Comments Due: July 29, 2024 Submission Type: API Docket: NRC-2024-0076 Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare an Environmental Assessment Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC and Holtec Palisades, LLC; Palisades Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 Comment On: NRC-2024-0076-0001 Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC, and Holtec Palisades, LLC; Palisades Nuclear Plant; Notice of Intent To Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare an Environmental Assessment Document: NRC-2024-0076-DRAFT-0070 Comment on FR Doc # 2024-14112 Submitter Information Name: Kristen Jacobs Address:
Covert, MI Email:Jacobskp@gmail.com Phone:5742720345 General Comment
Dear regulatory persons,
When the Palisades plant finally closed, the entire SW Michigan coastline dodged a Chernobyl bullet an environmental disaster that would have wiped out the entire Great Lakes basin. The safety record at Palisades and its glaring facility issues were among the worst for all power plants in the country. The facility is aged and brittle, and in the years prior to closing, maintenance was minimal. It was a ticking time bomb. Who knew that Holtec, a company with no experience operating a power plant, had no intention of following through with their contracted duty to oversee the permanent shut down and ongoing security of this fossil. When federal money became available to extend the life of currently operating plants, Holtec decided to get in on the gravy train by pretending Palisades was still in operationand not closed down prematurely and permanently for safety and cost reasons.
Now Holtec is doubling down on the pretense that Palisades is an operating facility by trying to deceive the NRC and DOE to allow a limited environmental impact study. This is disingenuous in the least and criminal to allow! NRC and DOE should require an environmental review that is at least as comprehensive as what the NRC requires for an operating plant applying to renew its license (SLR). The NRCs recent rulemaking on the scope of the review required for SLR confirms that Section 102(2) of the National Environmental Policy Act, implemented through 10 CFR Part 51, requires the preparation of an full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
Holtecs application should require the highest level of environmental review - an EIS that is directed to the unprecedented circumstances of this plant and the outlandish request before the NRC to restart a permanently shut down nuclear facility. Please strenuously question the highly risky venture they propose.
7/30/24, 7:59 AM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/2eef0d20-0087-42c0-acdc-fda40028a18c blob:https://www.fdms.gov/2eef0d20-0087-42c0-acdc-fda40028a18c 1/2 SUNSI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD: Laura Willingham, Mary Richmond, Antoinette Walker-Smith, Marlayna Doell, Mary Neely Comment (70)
Publication Date:6/27/2024 Citation: 89 FR 53659
Please require the highest level of environmental impact evaluation to arrive at a realistic assessment of a potential Great Lakes disaster should they move forward with pretending a 60 year old defunct nuclear facility is good as new. Please treat this proposal as if its happening in YOUR back yard!
Thank you, Kristen Jacobs. Covert, Mi 7/30/24, 7:59 AM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/2eef0d20-0087-42c0-acdc-fda40028a18c blob:https://www.fdms.gov/2eef0d20-0087-42c0-acdc-fda40028a18c 2/2