ML24205A020

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
5 - RG 1.59 - Appendix K - Consideration for Applying Guidance to Advanced Reactor and Small Modular Reactors - Stakeholders Meeting 07/24/2024
ML24205A020
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/23/2024
From: Jacqueline Thompson
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
Download: ML24205A020 (8)


Text

DG-1290, Revision 1 - Proposed Revision 3 to Regulatory Guide 1.59 Appendix K - Consideration for Applying Guidance to Advanced Reactors and Small Modular Reactors Presentation to Advanced Reactor Stakeholders Meeting July 24, 2024 Jenise Thompson NRR - Division of Engineering and External Hazards 1

Overview

  • RG 1.59, Revision 2, issued in 1977
  • Revision 3 initially issued for public comment as DG-1290 in 2022, reissued for public comments July 15, 2024
  • Appendix K adapts methodology from RG 4.26 to use a flexible stepwise approach to leverage PRA and site characteristics in flood evaluations for advanced reactors and SMRs 2

Adapting from RG 4.26

  • Leverage existing site characterization information
  • Screen hazards and consider risk insights
  • Allow for evaluation of SSC performance and mitigating actions in addition to or in place of detailed hazard analysis RG 4.26, Figure 3 3

RG 4.26, Figure 3 DG-1290, Figure K-1 4

Appendix K Flowchart

  • Step 1 - leverage site characterization information
  • Step 2 - determine which, if any, flood-causing mechanisms affect plant performance
  • Step 3 - determine if there is adequate engineering for SSCs to withstand the hazard Figure K-1, DG-1290, Rev. 1 5

Appendix K Flowchart

  • Step 4 - evaluate mitigating actions for adequacy
  • Step 6 - reassess design features and/or consider PRA
  • Step 5 - assessment is complete and results are documented Figure K-1, DG-1290, Rev. 1 6

Appendix K Summary

  • Focus on flood causing mechanisms of importance to the design
  • End the flood evaluation at the earliest possible point in the process.
  • Consider PRA or comparable analysis
  • Iterate between evaluation of SSCs performance and mitigating actions and design reassessment to achieve satisfactory result.

Figure K-1, DG-1290, Rev. 1 7

Next Steps

  • DG-1290, Revision 1, public comment period open.
  • Disposition of first set of public comments - ML23320A026