ML24201A037
| ML24201A037 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palisades |
| Issue date: | 07/15/2024 |
| From: | Public Commenter Public Commenter |
| To: | NRC/NMSS/DREFS |
| NRC/NMSS/DREFS | |
| References | |
| 89FR53659 | |
| Download: ML24201A037 (2) | |
Text
From:
Dietmar Detering <ddetering@gmail.com>
Sent:
Monday, July 15, 2024 6:14 AM To:
PalisadesRestartEnvironmental Resource
Subject:
[External_Sender] We need a timely restart of the Palisades Nuclear Plant
Dear Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Thank you for the opportunity to voice my support for the timely restart of the Palisades Nuclear Plant.
For this, I am advocating for an expedited environmental review process. This facility has strong support from both the local community and the broader public due to its significant role in our energy landscape and environmental stewardship.
There is currently no established regulatory framework for repowering a nuclear plant that has rendered its operating license. Antinuclear groups argue that the plant should undergo the regulatory process from scratch. However, considering the sites unchanged conditions since its shutdown in May 2022, a streamlined review process is both logical and necessary.
The environmental conditions at the Palisades site remain the same as when the plant was operational.
This stability underscores the importance of a prompt environmental review. The ecosystems along Lake Michigans coast are thriving, and repowering Palisades will ensure we continue to protect this ecological balance. Nuclear energy, as a clean and reliable source of power, is vital for reducing Michigans carbon footprint and preserving our natural environment.
While no human activity is risk free, delaying (or even preventing) the restart of the Palisades Plant will result in significant harm to climate, the environment, grid stability, and electricity consumers, as discussed in the July 11 hearing. Bipartisan support and substantial financing are in place to facilitate the plants restart. This support is driven by the need to lower CO2 emissions and prevent potential energy shortages in Michigan. The NRCs consideration of the plants status at its closure should guide the review process, avoiding unnecessary delays advocated by antinuclear groups.
Failing to repower Palisades would exacerbate the impact of closing 6 GWe of coal production by 2033 and reducing natural gas power production. Michigans energy demand is rising, and without Palisades firming power, the state faces scheduled blackouts, increased electricity costs, and potential deindustrialization, similar to challenges seen in Germany and California.
In conclusion, a timely environmental review is critical for the swift restart of the Palisades Nuclear Plant. This step is necessary to meet the energy needs and environmental goals of Michigan and the United States. I urge the NRC to expedite this process in response to the clear demand from the public and the local community.
Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.
Sincerely, Dietmar Detering, PhD
Federal Register Notice:
89FR53659 Comment Number:
46 Mail Envelope Properties (CAD1vPnunox4NYXi9rpNeE4pY+YidgVa1bBeS4fFswjGPb5psgA)
Subject:
[External_Sender] We need a timely restart of the Palisades Nuclear Plant Sent Date:
7/15/2024 6:14:06 AM Received Date:
7/15/2024 6:14:26 AM From:
Dietmar Detering Created By:
ddetering@gmail.com Recipients:
"PalisadesRestartEnvironmental Resource" <PalisadesRestartEnvironmental.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
mail.gmail.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2629 7/15/2024 6:14:26 AM Options Priority:
Normal Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date: