ML24170A446
| ML24170A446 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello  |
| Issue date: | 06/13/2024 |
| From: | Public Commenter Public Commenter |
| To: | NRC/NMSS/DREFS |
| NRC/NMSS/DREFS | |
| References | |
| 89FR31225 | |
| Download: ML24170A446 (2) | |
Text
From:
Martha Booz <mlbooz@calnatives.com>
Sent:
Thursday, June 13, 2024 4:52 PM To:
MonticelloEnvironmental Resource
Subject:
[External_Sender] Do NOT EXTEND the life of the Monticello Nuclear Plant I urge you NOT to extend the life of the Monticello Nuclear Power Plant in Minnesota. Why? Because electricity from a nuclear power plant is too expensive in terms of global warming emissions. Yes, there is no pollution from the plants operation, BUT what about mining of the uranium or other isotopes.
There are lots of emissions from mining, and you have to problem of disposal of the mine tailing. You also have the problem of the disposal of the used uranium? Where you going to put all that highly radioactive waste? There is no safe way to dispose of this waste.
Therefore, DO NOT EXTEND the life of the Monticello Nuclear Power Plant.
Martha L. Booz, Ph.D.
3823 Valley Lane El Sobrante, CA 94803-3118 mlbooz@calnatives.com
Federal Register Notice:
89FR31225 Comment Number:
1092 Mail Envelope Properties (107A69A1-A891-40AB-BD38-B3C5E4D77FE8)
Subject:
[External_Sender] Do NOT EXTEND the life of the Monticello Nuclear Plant Sent Date:
6/13/2024 4:51:50 PM Received Date:
6/13/2024 4:52:05 PM From:
Martha Booz Created By:
mlbooz@calnatives.com Recipients:
"MonticelloEnvironmental Resource" <MonticelloEnvironmental.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
calnatives.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 742 6/13/2024 4:52:05 PM Options Priority:
Normal Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date: