ML24086A366
| ML24086A366 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 02/07/2024 |
| From: | Schulte E Ameren Missouri |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Document Control Desk |
| References | |
| EIP-ZZ-00201, Add C, Rev 40 | |
| Download: ML24086A366 (1) | |
Text
PROCEDURE REVIEW FORM (PRF) 1.0 Initiation Initiator: Eric Schulte Date: 02/07/2024 Procedure Dept:
EP Document #: EIP-ZZ-00201 Addendum C Nev Rev. #
040
Title:
EOF Notification Package Level of Use:
I::continuous UReference Information JvIu1tip1e QN/A 2O Reason for Change/I)escription of Change Uct coinmitinents (kc. eB change Requests, OERs, P/ant Mods etc. and record numbers iiere)
CR 202305695. Changed several steps for clarity See SOC for more details.
3.O Document I)isposition ElTemp Change flNew Document 1Major Revision Minor Revision Ocancellation QAdrninIstrative Correction N/A
I )
I j ad or Design ted ruquirui for \\dminitr iti C orr%LUons (Sinaturc/PIN/Date no othu si.rntun.s required 4M Interim Approval (Temp. Change only)
Temp. Change #:
Expiration Date:
C ()gnL/ flt SUpLfllSOr (SLgnaturePlN/I)atc)
SKO Sgnatur N\\ I) te
- 5...0 Comments:
Continued: El 6O Reviews and Sigiiatu res (NOT requiredjor Administrative Corrections)
RellL
!? tjtUfL(!
I)L/)t PMI Signature Date (AOl 9 Attached Pi eparel 0
IL(q?r C/L/Zi I
f )c;Lü1 (7?
N/A Technica1Riew
-(2 C\\_
-i.-(
LYe, No ftchnia1 Review
-t---.
/C ---
o z. z z Li es No Add I Reiew
//5 c iL1 L Yes No I Re tew Yes EINo EIAdditionalReviews (See Attached (Z4OJ39forms).
Number of additional CAt) I 39s:
Tpt Coordinalor - PIN Sigttature Date CA0139 Attached DValidation El Yes El No 5O59 Review CA25 10 EICA25 I 1 EICA25 1 2 / EIN/A (perAPA-ZZ-O()143) ti Ai\\1
.S,eeiier Jnttial/PI:V I?evtewer In,tial / PIN (Dept head o; Designited Approvei) Is a Change Management Plan required EIYes 1No (IT \\ FS tt h CA2773 or t A2??4)
Is a Cross-Disciplina ry review requ I red ? 0Yes jNo 7.0 Approval (EIther approval must be pii1(/Ied as PATAPVI? or 1 I tLIPR o ç)!:ihcfcr Senior Director Nuclear Operations Approval (per APA-ZZ()t1 01 i (iRt is rtijuired in accordance with APA-ZZ-0009 I 1 Ikp rtn LfltIl Review and Approa1 ORC Meeting ZflO
?jj%
I)ept. Ilead or F)esignated Appro er (Signature/PIN/Date)
N()Ie. Page 2 provides instiuctions to complete tins form and may he c/icdd A190000I, 2, 5, 35
- A2100062, 65, 69 M190000I Page I of 2 APA-ZZ-OO I 01 rnntrnhd fl 4 /t:t6 i* 2-Senior 1) rector Nuclear Operations (Signature/PIN/I)ate)
CA0033 Rev. 002
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION Address the questions below for all aspects of the activity. If the answer is YES for any portion of the activity, apply the identified procedures to that portion of the activity. Note that it is not unusual to have more than one process apply to a given activity. Refer to Section 4 ofthe 10 CFR 50.59 Resource Manual (RM) and the instructions on pages 5-6 for additional guidance.
I.
Activity/Document Number: EIP-ZZ-00201 Addendum C Revision Number: 040
Title:
EOF Notification Package Brief Description of activity (what is being changed and why):
II.
Does the proposed activity fall within the scope of an activity that has been previously approved by the NRC or for which a 50.59/7248 Screen or evaluation has afready been performed?
(See Section 4.2 ofthe RM.)
III.
Does the proposed activity involve a changeto the:
1.
Technical Specifications or the Renewed Operating L cese9 (c 7
CR 50 90) 2.
Quality Assurance Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.54(a).)
3.
Security Plan which also includes the Cyber Security Plan?
(See 10 CFR 50.54(p).)
APA-ZZ-OO I 43 A170.OO1O IfYES, no further 50.59 (or 72.4$)
review beyond this Applicability Determination (AD) is required, but
Response
complete the remainder ofthis form.
Identify the applicable 50.59/72.48 NO L YES Evaluation Log No., License Amendment No., or applicable document number.
Document #
Response
See Section 4.2.1 ofthe RM.
ici NO i:i YES If YES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 lN and FDP-ZZ-00103.
- If YES, process per APA-ZZ-001 08 U YES and GDP-ZZ-00600 and related facility or procedure change prograti:is.
IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 i:i YES and SDP-ZZ-00030 for Security Plan and related facility or procedure change programs.
All the changes listed below are based off CR#202305695.
Page 2, Step 9-Added verbiage stating, begin timer counting down 60 minutes since last notification for next follow up message to be sent Page 3, Step 6-Changed step from Upon direction of the RM, advise CR Communicator that the EOF is assuming responsibility for Off-Site Notifications including to read, When Steps 1-5 are complete, request approval from the RM to transfer responsibility for Off-Site Notifications including:
Page 3, Step 7 Bullett 3-Changed step from, Add to the next required notification the note The EOF has Responsibility for Communication to now state, As part of the next follow-up 1notificationicIudethenoteTheEQF_hasResponsibilityfor Coiuniçation NO Page 1 CA2510 Rev. 005
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued) 4.
Radiological EmergencyResponse Plan (RERP) or Emergency Action Levels (EALS)? (See 10 CFR 50.54(q).)
Note: Ifyour proposed change alters a RERP IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 implementing procedure [any EIP-ZZ-XXXXj, equipment NO YES and KDP-ZZ-00400 for RERP and identified as important to emergency response [refer to related faci1itr or procedure change KDP-ZZ-00013J, or could alter response time, staffing, or
)programs.
other items covered in the 16 Planning Standards or in Appendix E to Part 50.47(b) [refer to KDP-ZZ-00400J, answerthis estion YES.
IIfYES, process APA-ZZ-00356 for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure change programs.
5, 1ST Program Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.55a(f).)
7.
Fire Protection Program? (See Operating License Condition 2.C(5).)
8.
Storage Cask Certif;cate of Compliance (CoC), including appendices?
(See 10 CFR 72.244.)
9.
Does the proposed activity impact other programs (e.g.,
the ODCM) that are controlled by regulations, the Operating License (including Orders and License Conditions) or the Technical Specifications? (See Section 4.2.1 oftheRM.)
Iv.
Does the l)t0P0Sed activit involve:
I. Maintenance which restores SSCs to their original (as designed) condition?
(See 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4).)
Note: Ifthe maintenance is on 1$FSI or cask-related items, the Maintenance Rule does NOT apply, and the activity is subject to a 10 CFR 72.48 Screen on a CA3 145.
NO EYES NO LjYES See fP Screening questions in EDP ZZ-04044. If any ofthe screening D YES questions are answered YES, a Fire Paotection review is needed in accordance with EDP-ZZ-04044.
IF YES, then contact Regulatory i:i YES Affairs/Licensing to determine next steps.
If YES, indicate the applicable NO EJ YES program in Brief Description Section.
Response
See Section 4.2.2 ofthe RM IfYES, process change per M NO LI YES APA-ZZ-00101 for procedure changes or APA-ZZ-00320/330/340 for Maintenance activities.
APA-ZZ-OO 143 A170.OO1O CA2510 Rev. 005 6.
151 Program Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.55a(g).)
If YES, process per EDP-ZZ-0 1003 for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure change programs.
NO NO Page 2
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued) 2.
A temporary alteration (to procedures or the facility) supporting maintenance (TASM) that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less?
V Does the pi tpuscd cict iE involve a ih ing. to the 1.
FSAR NO EYES If the above response is NO, check N/A in the Response column at right.
Ifthe above response is YES, does the proposed activity involve an FSAR change that may be excluded from the requirement to perform a 50.59 Screen/Evaluation by NEI 9607 or NEI 9803? (Provide a YES or NO response to this question in the Response column at right.)
Note: In lieu ofthe exclusion criteria of RM Section 4.2.3, a YES response may also be provided if the FSAR change requires no ftirther 5059 review based on a YES response to the question in Section II of this Applicability Determination form.)
2.
Technical Specification Bases?
NO E YES Ifthe above response is NO, check N/A in the Response column at right.
If the above response is YES, does the proposed activity involve a TS Bases change comparable to that which may be excluded from the requirement to perform a 50.59 Screen/Evaluation by NEI 9607 or NEI 98 -O3 (as described for an FSAR change)? (Provide a YES or NO response to this question in the Response column at right.)
Note: in lieu ofthe exclusion criteria ofRM Section 42.3, a YES response may also be provided ifthe TS Bases change requires no further 5059 review based on a YES response to the question in Section 11 of this Applicability Determination form.)
VI.
Does the Pr0POSCd activity involve a change to:
1.
Managerial or administrative procedures, controls, or activities (including software used only for the implementation of administrative procedures, controls, or NO activities) governing the conduct of facility operations (ub1Lu to the control of 1(K I 1t] 1)pd\\ B) 2.
Regulatory commitment not covered by another regulation NO based change process? (Sec NEI 99O4.)
APA-ZZ-OO 143 A170.OO1O If YES, process per APA-ZZ-OO 101 for procedure changes or APA-ZZ-00605 for facility changes NO E YES or Procedurally Controlled Temporary Modifications or
- MDPZZFSOO 1 for Freeze Seals.
Evaluate risk using APA-ZZ-003 15, Appendix A.
, See Section 4.2.3 ofthe RiM Process the FSAR change per APA-ZZ-00108 and FDP-ZZ-00 103 for revising License Documents.
Note:
A NO response in the Response LI NO LI YES column at left means that the IFSARJTS Bases change is one that N/A reqiiire; further 50.59 review (i.e., is not excludable from further review).
A YES response means that the FSAR does NOT require further 50.59 review.
Process the TS Bases change per APA-ZZ-00108 and FDP-ZZ-00103 for revising License Documents.
Note:
A NO response in the Response column at left means that the T$
U ro 0 YES Bases change is one that requires further 50.59 review (i.e., is not N/A excludable from further review).
A YES response means that the TS Bases Change does NOT require further 50.59 review.
Response
See Section 4.2.4 / 4.2.6 ofthe RM.
E YES YES, process per APA-ZZ-00 101 or APA-ZZ-00109.
E YES IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-00540.
Response
Page 3 CA2510 Rev. 005
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)
VII i)os the. proposed act vity powntial ly iflct the des, t)1)eratic)1L (W maintenaice oi thu isjs.I flici1i described in NO YES the dry cask storage FSAR or the 72.212 Report? (See FDP ZZ-00105 and Attachment 1 ofAPA-ZZ-00143j IfYE$, perform a 72.48 Screen per APA-ZZ-OO143 unless the change is comp1ete1y covered by the response to Section II.
Note:
Editoria1 or administrative changes are excluded from the requirement to p.ifonn a 72.48 Review.
APA-ZZ-OO143 A17OMO1O Page 4 CA2510 Rev. 005
APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)
VIII. Justification/explanation for Response(s) (as needed):
Revision ofthe RERP Implementing procedure is covered solely by 1OCfR 5054(aj and controlled by KDP-ZZ-00400.
Therefore, 10CFR5O.59 is not required.
Ix.
Conclusion:
All aspects ofthe activity controlled by one or more ofthe procedures above, therefore a 5059 Screen required.
U A portion ofthe activity jjçt controlled by one or more ofthe procedures above, therefore a 50.59 Screen j required.
- x. $ignoffs:
Qualified Preparer E:2;/L Date O4j /g3L (Print mllne)
(S.ign:P1Ni Qualified Reviewer nv i
Date
/
(Prmtname)
Sifl:iiN)
Ensure that once signed, this record is loaded into EB with the Activity/Document Number listed above or submit this form to either the Regulatory Affairs clerk or another member ofAdministration in accordance with APA-ZZ-00220.
APA-ZZ-00143 Page 5 CA2510 A170.OO1O Rev. 005
50.54(q) Screening Form Document #, Rev #, &
Title:
EIP-ZZ-00201 ADD C, Rev. 040, EOF NotificatIon Package EP Tracking #:
2024005 Activity Description and
References:
EIP-ZZOO2O1 ADD c (CR 202305695)
Page 2, step 9 revised to start countdown timer for 60 minutes since the ast notification as a reminder for the next foIIowup notification.
Page 3, step 6 carified guidance of transfer of OffSite Notification responsibility from Control Room to EOF.
Page 3, step 7 updated guidance of when to add note The EOF has responsibility for Communication.
Activity Scope:
YES NO Does this act;ityievsetheRaaicaIErneenResponse Plan (RIRP) o; IrnpIernentin Piocedures ChangeType; YES NO Is this actlvlt3 editorial oi typographical9 L
Previously Approved Change:
YES NO Is this activity being processed to conform to a previously approved activity?
... U IfYES, what is the previously approved activity?
Planning Standard Determination:
Does this activity impact any of the 5047(b) Planning Standards or Part 50 Appendix E:
YES NO 50.47(b)(1)
- Assignment ofResponsibility (OrganizatIon Control)?
U 50A7(b)(2)
- Onsite Emergency Organization?
Li 50A7(b)(3)
- Emergency Response Support and Resources?
- ...LI so 47(b)(4)
Emergency Classification Systern Li 50A7(b)(5)
- Notification Methods and Procedures
. (X2 50.47(b)(6)
- Emergency Communications?
Z,.........
.... Li 50.47(b)(7)
- Public Education and Information?
+.........
. D 50A7(b)(8)
- Emergency Facility and Equipment?
fl E
50.47(b)(9)
- Accident Assessment?
. El 50A7(b)(10)
- Protective Response?
LI 50.47(b)(1 1)
- Radiological Exposure Control?
.... El 5047(b)(12) - Medical and Public Health Support2
- LI 50.47(b)( I 3)
- Recovery Planning and Post Accident Operations?
LI 5047(b)(14)
Drills and Exercises7 50A7(b)(15)
- Rmergency Responder Training?
5047(b)( 1 6) - Emergency Plan Maintenance?
Part5OAppendixE?
L Commitment Impact Determination:
YES NO Does this activity impact a Site Specific EP Commitment not associated with a Planning Standard or Element?
.. El IfYes, record the Commitment number:
Explanation of Determination: (Enter an explanation to each determination-answer that needs clarUlcation.)
Page 2, step 9 revised to start countdown timer for 60 minutes since the last notification as a reminder for the next follow-up notification.
Page 3? step 6 clarified guidance of transfer of Off-Site Notification responsibility from Controt Room to EOF.
Page 3, step 7 updated guidance ofwhen to add note The EOF has responsibility for Communication.
These changes do not result in a reduction in effectiveness of the Callaway notification methods or procedures.
Screening Evaluation Results:
Based on the results ofthe information above, can the activity be implemented without performing a YES NO full 50.54(q) Effectiveness Evaluation?
LI Review/Approval:
/
Preparer(Sign/PIN):
?
Date:QZ IIUt! i Ufned Emrgeiity Response Coordinator Reviewer (Sign/PIN):
1@i_L1
. 5.
Date:
21 t1/4 Reviewer iiiti.,i hjitfiiw/ An Response Coordtnator Emergency Preparedness Manager (Sign/PiN):
File#A210.0038 Page 1 ofl CA1523 KDP-ZZ4)0400 Rev. 002