ML23240A525

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2023 RIC Commissioner Plenary - Bradley R. Crowell - Remarks
ML23240A525
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/15/2023
From:
NRC/OCM
To:
Shared Package
ML23240A518 List:
References
Download: ML23240A525 (1)


Text

1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

+ + + + +

35TH REGULATORY INFORMATION CONFERENCE (RIC)

+ + + + +

COMMISSIONER CROWELL PLENARY

+ + + + +

WEDNESDAY,

MARCH 15, 2023

+ + + + +

The Plenary Session convened at the

Bethesda North Marriott Hotel and Conference

Center, located at 5701 Marinelli Road, North

Bethesda, Maryland and via Videoconference, at 9:15

a.m. EDT, the Honorable Bradley R. Crowell,

Commissioner, NRC, presiding.

PRESENT:

BRADLEY R. CROWELL, Commissioner, NRC

ANDREA VEIL, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation, NRC

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 2

P-R-O-C-E-E-D-I-N-G-S

9:16 a.m.

MS. VEIL: All right. It is my distinct

honor to introduce the final Commission Plenary and

our newest Commissioner. The Honorable Bradley R.

Crowell was sworn in as a Commissioner of the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission on August 26th, 2022,

and is currently serving the remainder of a five-year

term ending June 30th, 2027.

Commissioner Crowell has more than 20

years of experience in the fields of energy,

environment, natural resources, climate change, and

national security including executive leadership

positions in the federal and state government. Prior

to beginning his tenure as Commissioner he served as

Director of the Nevada Department of Conservation and

Natural Resources as an Assistant Secretary of the

U.S. Department of Energy.

Please welcome Commissioner Crowell.

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: Thank you, Andrea.

So, as the fifth and final Commissioner to speak at

the conference, I'm going to go off script here a

little bit at the beginning, taking that liberty.

I wanted to let you know that one of the

big differences for me pre-COVID versus post-COVID is

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 3

I now have to wear reading glasses, but I'm going to

try to do the speech without my glasses. And I may

or may not be successful, so bear with me.

(Laughter.)

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: Second, despite

the fact that Commissioner Caputo and I ran into each

other late last night in the office as we were putting

-- making changes and putting finishing touches on

our remarks, we had not discussed the content of our

remarks at all, but I too am going to talk with the

theme of, what does success look like? And she stole

my joke.

(Laughter.)

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: So another

difference for me pre-versus post-COVID is that I'm

now a father and I'm full of bad jokes and I'm going

to attempt to insert one. So again, bear with me,

and charitable laughter is appreciated.

So, with that, again, Andrea, thank you

for the very nice introduction. I'm delighted to be

here today with so many distinguished guests at the

Nuclear Regulatory Commission's 2023 Regulatory

Information Conference, otherwise known as the RIC.

In this conference, NRC has once again gathered

nuclear professionals involved in the safe and secure

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 4

use of nuclear energy and other uses of radioactive

materials.

While this is my first RIC, I appreciate

that for 35 years now the NRC has hosted this meeting,

a diverse gathering of professionals from the NRC,

other government agencies, non-governmental

organizations, academia, and industry, all to discuss

topics of mutual interest.

I'd also like to extend a special welcome

and thank you to our international partners

participating in this conference, both in person and

virtually. It is my distinct privilege to address

all of you today.

So, I'm told that the RIC has a history

of good humor, and we're getting back to it this year

after a pause from humor during the COVID pandemic.

Humor is difficult in a virtual setting, so again for

those attending virtually, bear with us here.

I'll offer you this: If you disagree

with some or all of my remarks today, or if I make

any factual areas, it's not my fault. I used ChatGPT

to write my speech.

(Laughter.) COMMISSIONER CROWELL: Ahhh,

Commissioner Caputo. Our offices adjoin and I'll

have to see if there's a hole in the wall or a

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 5

listening device, because this wasn't even that good

of a joke to steal, but here we are.

(Laughter.)

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: So I'll fall back

on my other joke and try to spin it into something

positive. I'd like to say that the only reason NRC

Commissioners' offices have a private bathroom in the

office is so that you don't create a quorum in the

men's room.

(Laughter.)

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: Happens to be

true. Also, it is a valid commentary on a statement

Commissioner Caputo raised of the need for diversity

from top to bottom, from bottom to top, at the agency.

So, while humorous, it's also something we need to

address. And I appreciate the charitable laughs.

All right. Back to the script. As many

of you know, I'm the last NRC Commissioner to offer

a plenary speech at this year's RIC because I'm the

newest member of the Commission. As Andrea

mentioned, I began my tenure on the Commission late

-- in late August of last year. I was honored to

navigate the Senate confirmation process in tandem

with my colleague Commissioner Caputo, who has

returned to service on the Commission. And I'd like

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 6

to express my deep appreciation to all of my fellow

Commissioners for their guidance and insights as I've

settled into my role on the Commission over the last

six months.

Thank you.

I will also take a moment to introduce to

you my staff, my A Team, for those who haven't had a

chance to meet them yet. Candice Trummell is my chief

of staff and is a friend and colleague from my time

at the Department of Energy. Maxine Keefe is my legal

counsel. Dave Brown is my technical assistant for

materials. And Janet Lepre is my executive

assistant. Brian Anderson, who recently retired from

the agency, was my reactor TA. And I am now looking

to fill that spot, but one hurdle at a time. So I'll

get through today hopefully first. I cannot

overstate my gratitude for the professionalism of my

staff, their expertise, and perhaps more importantly

their tireless enthusiasm and support.

So the title of this year's RIC,

Navigating the Nuclear Future, is an appropriate

theme for this point in history, however if I could

rephrase that title slightly I would change it to

Navigating our Nuclear Future. I say "our" because

the nuclear future -- I believe our nuclear future is

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 7

-- I believe that the path forward for civilian

nuclear energy is one that we must share if we are to

succeed.

And if you're participating in this

conference, then you're all on the front lines of

sharing this collective responsibility to try to path

forward to a true and enduring nuclear renaissance.

We can either share in the success of navigating our

way to a responsible nuclear future or we will share

in the failure to do so. Like many of you, I prefer

success.

So this begs the question what is

success? I'm sure each of us has a different

definition of success depending on your professional

and personal perspective. My version of success,

which I will share with you today, reflects my view

as just one Commissioner among the five-member

Commission of the NRC. And my views are shaped by my

understanding of the NRC's purpose, mission, and

goals.

My views are also shaped from my personal

and professional experiences prior to joining the

Commission. And since I'm the new guy around here,

I'll take a minute to briefly share with you some

things about me so you can better understand my

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 8

perspective. And I'll reiterate a little bit of what

Andrea said, but try not to duplicate it too much.

I was born and raised in Carson City,

Nevada. My father, Robert Crowell, was a Vietnam

veteran, long-term member of the Navy, and also

three-term mayor of Carson City until he passed in

2020. I mention him in part because he devoted his

life to public service and he is the inspiration for

my commitment to public service.

My public service career began after

graduating from Santa Clara University in California,

when I drove from California to Washington, D.C.,

stopping in my hometown of Carson City to purchase a

1985 Cadillac from a pawn shop for $1,900.

After barely making it across the

country, I cut my teeth answering the phone and

writing constituent letters for former Nevada

Governor and U.S. Senator Richard Bryan until he

retired. I later worked for Senator Sheldon

Whitehouse of Rhode Island during his first term in

the Senate. And from there I moved to a role in the

Obama-Biden Administration at the Department of

Energy, including as Assistant Secretary for

Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs.

At DOE, I gained insights on many

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 9

nuclear-related topics including advanced nuclear

reactor technologies, consent-based siting for spent

nuclear fuel, nuclear weapons modernization, and

cleaning up America's Cold War era environmental

legacy.

My tenure at DOE coincided with both the

2011 Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan and the 2014

radioactive waste incident at DOE's Waste Isolation

Plant in New Mexico.

In late 2016 I left DOE and I left D.C.

altogether to return to my home state of Nevada to

serve as a cabinet member for two Nevada governors;

one Republican and one Democrat, where I led the

Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. In

that role, I led a state-level cabinet agency of 1,000

employees responsible for a broad range of issues

including hard rock and critical minerals mining,

hazardous and low-level radiological waste disposal,

water rights, land management, and many other issues.

Having served in leadership roles at both

the federal and state levels of government, I have a

unique understanding and appreciation for how public

agencies can impact our daily lives. These past

experiences inform my thinking on success. For

example, these experiences taught me that success in

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 10

the operation of a public agency necessitates

balance, transparency, efficiency, and fact-based

decision making.

These are values I know the NRC shares as

well, but these values deserve constant polishing and

reevaluation to ensure they are being implemented

effectively. Organizational values of every kind

lose their meaning if your stakeholders and the

public for whom we ultimately serve do not experience

the benefit of these values when put in practice.

So today I will share my views on what I

believe constitutes success over the next five years;

what our shared nuclear future can and should

accomplish in that time. I've chosen five years

because I see that period as a critical window of

time that will determine whether nuclear energy can

establish itself as a lasting meaningful part of our

country's energy portfolio. Conveniently, five years

also corresponds to the length of time I have on my

current term at the NRC. So as of today, about six

months, I've got 1,568 days remaining for me to do

my job to successfully navigate our nuclear future,

to which I say game on.

So how do I define success in the context

of navigating our nuclear future? In short, I believe

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 11

successfully navigating our nuclear future will be

measured by the progress that we make in three

fundamental areas: (1) health and safety; (2) climate

change; and (3) energy security. I'll address each

of these in turn.

First, the NRC must remain vigilant in

its commitment to adequately protecting the public

health, safety, and security of the American public

and the protection of our environment. These

concepts are at the core of NRC's mission and must

never be compromised.

This commitment requires the NRC to

maintain a strong safety culture and ensure continued

focus on learning, innovation, diversity, inclusion,

and the adoption of technologies. And the NRC must

continue to build trust as a capable, independent,

transparent, and objective regulator. But this trust

must be earned. It necessitates consistent proactive

engagement.

Second, to achieve success I believe the

NRC must execute its mission on a timeline that

supports the U.S. Government's energy and climate

goals. Today nuclear energy provides approximately

20 percent of our electricity generation in the

United States and 50 percent of our carbon-free

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 12

electricity. Nuclear will play a prominent role --

nuclear will likely play a prominent role in meeting

our country's collective carbon reduction goals.

This means our regulatory decisions at the NRC must

be technically sound to maintain adequate protection

of public health and safety and protection of the

environment.

But equally as important these decisions

must also be made on a timeline commensurate with the

urgent realities of climate change. At risk of

putting too fine a point on it, we are facing the

urgent imperative of climate change and the need to

realize significant reductions in carbon by the end

of this decade.

The science shows clearly that in order

to divert the worst impacts of climate change and

preserve a livable planet we must take global action

to limit the increase in global average temperature

to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Currently temperatures are

about 1.1 degrees Celsius since -- warmer than the

late 1800s. Emissions are continuing to rise. To

have a chance at keeping global warming to no more

than 1.5 degrees Celsius as called for in the Paris

Agreement, emissions need to be reduced by 45 percent

by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050. No small task.

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 13

The United States has a moral obligation

to do its part meeting this goal as a responsible

steward of our shared environment, but also to

maintain our global leadership role and capture the

economic benefits of the clean energy economy. As

President Biden's climate, envoy former Senator and

Secretary of State John Kerry, said in a recent

reference to nuclear energy in the context of climate

change, quote, I don't think we can get there without

it. I think he's right.

There is a need for secure reliable

energy for our low or zero carbon energy future.

Nuclear energy is a critical option for on-demand

base load power to complement the expansion of

renewable energy and energy storage that must replace

our current reliance on fossil fuels.

A perfect case in point of this

imperative is demonstrated by recent events like the

State of the California reversing course to maintain

a carbon-free power from the Diablo Canyon Nuclear

Power Plant. In fact, we are seeing more states

across the political spectrum increasingly consider

new nuclear power and/or overturning existing state-

level bans on nuclear energy. Whether states are

moving in this direction to meet state-level clean

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 14

energy goals for enhanced energy security or both,

what is becoming abundantly clear is that nuclear

energy will be needed to achieve either objective.

While the NRC is not in the driver's seat on climate

change and energy security, we must also not be a

hindrance to success in these areas.

Finally, the third fundamental area for

which I'll -- I should mention measures of success is

energy security. The realities of climate change and

the necessities of energy security go hand in hand.

Working with our internationals partners to allow for

the safe expansion of the use of nuclear energy across

the globe is part of becoming -- is part of forming

the foundation of a reliable, safe, secure, and

decarbonized domestic energy sector here at home.

As regulators from across the world,

we're all responsible for making technically sound

decisions that are in the best interest of our

respective sovereign nations, but we will also all

benefit from continued collaboration particularly as

we review novel technologies and operational

approaches.

As Canada's Rumina Velshi said recently,

who I haven't met yet but who I look forward to

meeting, this process -- quote, this process will be

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 15

smoother and easier if we are willing to share our

experiences as we go through it and learn from others

along the way. I very much agree with her.

This point is underscored by the newly

emergent geopolitical realities of energy supply and

energy services following Ukraine's invasion --

Russia's invasion of Ukraine. For nuclear energy

this reality has shone a spotlight on a long overdue

need for the U.S. to establish an adequate reliable

domestic supply of nuclear fuel and related

enrichment services.

These geopolitical challenges are

obviously much larger than just the nuclear fuel

conundrum in the U.S. And I thank our special guests

here today and this week, including Ambassador

Holgate and Director General Grossi for their

steadfast attention to the full spectrum of energy

and other security-related challenges triggered by

Russia's actions in Ukraine. And I join my fellow

Commissioners in applauding our Ukrainian

counterparts for their steadfast vigilance in the

face of unimaginable adversity.

So that's our outlined goals for a

successful, responsible, and lasting nuclear

renaissance. But how do we get there? I believe

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 16

that the recipe and ingredients for success exists

today more than at any time -- more than at any one

time since the advent of commercial nuclear power

over 70 years ago.

While much has been slowly percolating in

the commercial nuclear energy sector of the past 10

to 15 years, the momentum we are seeing today began

truly accelerating in just the past few years. In

the United States the Nuclear Energy Innovation and

Modernization Act of 2019, or NEIMA, set the stage

for modernizing the commercial nuclear energy

regulatory process in preparation for a new era of

advanced nuclear power technologies.

While the NRC has been working to fully

implement NEIMA's requirements the White House and

Congress came together again in 2021 to enact new and

enhanced incentives to help maintain the viability of

our existing nuclear fleet while also supporting the

development of new advanced reactor technologies that

promise to deliver more carbon-free nuclear energy to

our grid through safer and more cost-effective

nuclear reactor designs and advanced fuels.

Two landmark bills, the Bipartisan

Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act,

each included what Congress determined to be

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 17

essential support to help secure the future of

carbon-free nuclear energy in the United States. The

nuclear-related provisions of both bills received

bipartisan support in the House and the Senate, a

fact in of itself that shouldnt be notable, except

that in today's political environment, it is a

rarity, especially on a topic like energy policy.

And Congress took action again just last

year to fill another critical gap necessary for

navigating our nuclear future by providing needed

direction and investment to establish a secure long-

term domestic nuclear fuel supply chain.

So here we are in 2023 with the makings

of a modernized regulatory pathway and significant

federal financing incentives for new and existing

nuclear power plants and nuclear fuel supplies,

coming together at the same time advanced nuclear

technologies are on the cusp of commercialization.

This confluence is noteworthy and it should not be

taken for granted. It's an all too uncommon

occurrence in the less-than-perfect world of policy

making to have all of these things coming together at

the same time.

Now while we have all of the elements

converging as crucial ingredients in the recipe for

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 18

success, the cake is not going to bake itself.

Everyone attending the RIC this week has one or more

roles to play in helping this recipe come together to

ensure nuclear energy can be a safe, secure, and

reliable part of our clean energy future. And the

Nuclear Regulatory Commission itself is no exception.

Indeed, the NRC's role is not only critical, but

perhaps the most daunting as well.

The NRC will need to shift the way it has

traditionally operated to accommodate an anticipated

workload that is larger and broader in scope than

ever before and it must do so on a timeline and

continued pace unlike at any point since the agency's

inception. But I am confident that with clear

direction and sustained leadership from the

Commission and NRC senior career staff we can keep

the agency true to its mission while not losing sight

of the bigger picture imperatives of climate change

and energy security.

I'm confident that the expert dedicated

staff throughout the NRC are up to the task. In fact,

I think they're hungry for the challenge. Or as my

colleague Commissioner Wright would say, they're

ready to meet the moment.

As the newest Commissioner on the NRC I'm

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 19

committed to helping facilitate the agency's success

to transform the NRC into a modern, risk-informed,

and efficient regulator. In doing so, I intend to

question the status quo through leveraging my prior

leadership roles in federal and state government. I

will endeavor to maintain my external perspective to

ensure the NRC's transformation achieves -- is

achieved not through words, but through tangible and

common-sense actions.

So how do we do this? It's not going to

be easy, but I will share with you some of the ongoing

and necessary reforms that I believe are the most

important for the NRC to do its part.

First, reinvigorating the heart of our

agency, the NRC staff. One of the NRC's current

strategic goals is to continue to foster a healthy

organization. To do that we must reinvigorate the

NRC with a renewed and expanded sense of purpose.

In 1962 President John F. Kennedy visited

NASA for the first time. During his tour of the

facility he met a janitor who was carrying a broom

down the hallway. When the President asked the

janitor what he did for NASA, the janitor replied I'm

helping put a man on the moon.

At the NRC all employees should

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 20

understand how important their respective roles are

to ensuring the safety and security of nuclear

technology and that the agency's mission is integral

to meeting our collective climate and energy security

goals.

We must always maintain a strong safety

culture. This requires that all employees feel free

to raise concerns all the way up to the Commission

level if needed and that they know their concerns are

heard and addressed. Good ideas and questions can

come from any person at any level in the organization.

We must be vigilant in breaking down silos throughout

the agency that impede effectively working together

and we must avoid the temptation of thinking

myopically, speaking in bureaucratic terms rather

than in human ones and never losing sight of the big

picture or forget our shared sense of purpose as

public servants.

The NRC must be innovative, become more

diverse and inclusive, and be a learning organization

that values continuous improvement. The NRC has a

tremendous track record of ensuring safety and

security, but I don't think everyone knows that.

Moving ahead we must maintain that record at a scale

and on a timeline unlike ever before. But in doing

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 21

so we must also not be afraid to try and fail

occasionally along the way.

To build on Chair Hanson's quoting of

Albert Einstein in his remarks yesterday, Einstein

also said, quote, failure is success in progress. We

must remember that true and lasting transformation is

an iterative process. We will stumble along the way.

We will learn from it and we will become better. And

it will all start with having the right workforce

that reflects today's challenges.

The current NRC workforce is world class,

but increasingly retirement-eligible. I'm on the

younger half of the age -- median age line at the

NRC, as more than 50 percent of the agency is

currently over the age of 50. Factoring in attrition

rates we will need to hire between 100 and 200 new

employees every year just to maintain current

staffing levels. Not easy in any environment, much

less today's economic environment and with the

technical skills we need.

So if a lasting nuclear renaissance takes

hold beyond the next five years, then we will need to

continue to grow even further to meet our increasing

workload. We need to attract, develop, and maintain

a high-performing, diverse, engaged, and flexible

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 22

workforce, and we must do so in an environment where

we are competing with each of your organizations for

a very specialized and limited talent pool. We are

not only thinking about the workforce we need in the

future, but also the regulatory processes that the

workforce is currently developing and will navigate

in the future.

The amount of hugely important work to be

done at the NRC cannot be overstated. For example,

Congress directed the NRC with developing a risk-

informed technology-inclusive regulatory framework

for advanced reactors, Part 53. It's just one of the

many rulemakings that is an enormous undertaking

currently at the NRC.

But none of this will be possible without

public trust. And I'm glad that public trust is

another one of the NRC's current strategic goals

inspiring the confidence -- inspiring the public's

confidence in the NRC.

To do this well means we must double down

on current efforts to engage in proactive and

meaningful interactions with states, tribes, and

other governmental and non-governmental

organizations as well as with industry, international

bodies, and the public. The NRC must provide fair

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 23

and timely opportunities for public involvement in

its decision making. I recognize the challenges

around public communication in a large governmental

organization, but regards to those challenges clear

understandable communication must always be one of

the agency's highest priorities.

From the big picture context I doubt the

majority of the public in the United States has heard

of the NRC, and even less know what the NRC does.

And of those that are familiar with the NRC it's very

possible that their impression of us is not a positive

one. This needs to change, but it will not change if

we remain in the shadows.

Another thing I like to say in previous

organizations I've led and worked for is that you

will be -- if you don't celebrate your successes,

you'll be defined by your failures. And we need to

do a better job of celebrating our successes and

communicating that with a wider audience.

But this will not change without every

NRC employee doing their part to improve the

narrative in the course of their role at the agency.

We must also be working from the same common theme

and sense of purpose.

We must develop new communication

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 24

strategies, get better at explaining what we do in

the plainest language possible such that our friends

and neighbors can understand and appreciate the

important role that the NRC plays in our daily lives.

We must always strive to provide high-

quality information to the public in an accessible,

comprehensive, and clear manner. We must ensure any

person or organization who wishes to participate can

understand and navigate the regulatory process.

We must also focus on the full fuel cycle

from mining to waste. To build trust we must reassert

commensurate focus on the full fuel cycle. Over the

years there have been several studies and polls that

have shown the support for nuclear energy would

increase if the waste disposal issue was resolved.

While the NRC is not in charge of siting a permanent

nuclear waste repository, that doesn't mean we should

ignore the reality that one is needed and that a

consent-based process is the best route for doing so.

We need to approach technical and

regulatory decisions related to decommissioning with

the same rigor as we do with new reactors. The same

goes for life extension requests for the existing

fleet. Basically we can't afford any foot faults as

we look to submit the foundation for - a hope for a

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 25

nuclear renaissance.

We know spent fuel and high-level waste

is and can continue to be stored safely for the

foreseeable future. And I agree with Bill Gates who

recently noted that nuclear waste is not a reason to

not deploy more nuclear energy, but we must not ignore

it either.

I believe our regulatory decisions will

have broader public acceptance if the public knows we

are considering the entire fuel cycle and if there is

proactive engagement on used fuel management and

waste disposal by the commercial and public entities

involved.

As the nuclear power industry continues

to transform from large light water reactors in a

once-through fuel cycle to what may be future small

and advanced reactors powered by recycled fuel, the

NRC just recommit itself to keeping apace.

The opportunities for diversification

within the U.S. nuclear industry are nothing less

than breathtaking. New fuels, new enrichment

processes, new reactors, and yes, possibly even new

ways to manage waste by recycling and reusing spent

fuel. And fission isn't the only game in town anymore

either. Dare I say it? Fusion could make an

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 26

appearance on just the other side of the five-year

window I focused on today.

I just mentioned managing waste among

other things, that will be part of a revitalized

nuclear power industry. As we move forward I think

it will also be important to successfully manage

decommissioning of all kinds of facilities. Nuclear

facility decommissioning and radioactive waste

management, safely managing waste throughout the

entire fuel cycle, weighs heavily on people's minds,

the legacy of contaminated sites including abandoned

uranium mines, uranium milling and mill tailing

disposal sites and low-level waste disposal

facilities. Remedying and not repeating the mistakes

of the past will require proactive engagement with a

broad array of stakeholders.

In five years I believe that NRC's

reputation must transform into the following: (1)

The NRC is known for making sure civilian nuclear

power is safe for everyone now and for future

generations; (2) because the NRC makes nuclear power

possible, it plays an indispensable role in averting

climate change; (3) the NRC is essential to our long-

term energy security by facilitating the safe

adoption of reliable, advanced nuclear energy

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 27

technologies.

If we have another false start in a hope

for a nuclear renaissance it will spell doom for the

future of the advanced -- of advanced nuclear energy.

Neither policy makers nor the public will have the

patience or belief that widespread nuclear energy is

feasible. Five years from now nuclear energy is

either in the game as a safe, reliable part of our

energy supply or it will become a stagnant, declining

part of our energy portfolio for the remaining life

of the existing plants.

The table is set for a true renaissance

this time like never before. Legislation,

geopolitics, climate change, energy security,

technological readiness are all there. The NRC needs

to be part of the solution by making data-driven and

risk-informed decisions that enable the deployment of

safe and secure nuclear technologies on a timeline

commensurate with our shared climate and carbon

reduction goals. As Energy Secretary Granholm

recently said, these next few years offer a can't-

miss opportunity to harness nuclear's full potential.

And I couldn't agree with her more.

Each of you play a role in making this

opportunity a reality. I thank you all for allowing

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 28

me to share my perspectives with you today and I

welcome any questions you may have.

MS. VEIL: Well, first of all,

congratulations on the milestone of your first RIC

speech. I know how it feels to be up there with those

lights. So congratulations.

So the first question is as you aptly

pointed out, it is our nuclear -- our -- this is

capitalized -- it is our nuclear future. For the NRC

to do its part to meet the demands of the most

important moment in our energy future, leadership

courage and accountability will be needed to adhere

to the NRC's five principles of good regulation.

What is being done to address this aspect

to ensure the agency is positioned to meet the

timeline demands to achieve climate change and energy

security goals?

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: Thanks for passing

that question along, Andrea. It's a great question

and quite honestly it's -- the answer to which is

something I'm trying to figure out as well.

There are lots of things happening in the

transformation space to modernize the agency and make

it more reflective of current needs, but I don't think

we've looked at it in terms of how we're doing our

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 29

transformation modernization in the context of a

timeline to meet larger policy goals. And so I think

we need to start looking at those things in the

context of broader-held societal objectives, climate

change, energy security.

MS. VEIL: Okay. Second question:

Health physicists are greatly needed in the agency

and in the industry. What can the NRC do besides

fellowships to draw them to the agency and to retain?

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: Also a great

question. So I don't know specific to health

physicists, if there is something that is unique we

can do to recruit and retain them other than what I

think we can do to recruit and retain employees of

all stripes, which, one, is to have a more flexible

nimble hiring process and work environment. And I

think even more importantly is communicating well the

unique nature of the work that you can do at the NRC

and the difference you can make in making the world

a better place. I mean, this is the trade-off for

some of the traditionally lower salary in a

government position is the fact that you get to be

involved in so many cool things and you get to make

a difference. And if that's not of interest to you,

then government probably isn't the place for you to

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 30

be. But if it is, it can be a really cool and special

place to be. And the NRC can be at the heart of that.

And I think in the past it really has and we just

need to reclaim that mantle.

MS. VEIL: Okay. Next question: How do

you think DOE and NRC can overcome NIMBY, not in my

back yard -- I'm sure everybody knew that, but just

in case -- for either siting a high-level nuclear

waste site or reprocessing plant?

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: Lots and lots of

proactive engagement. Looking for support that can

then help put the meat on the definition of what

consent-based siting could be. I also think we should

look at to our neighbors to the north in Canada and

some of our international partners: Finland, France,

Switzerland, and others, that are further along the

line in establishing repositories and see what worked

for them. But the way not to do it is through the

non-engagement process. I think if we repeat the

mistakes of the past, we're going to fail. Even a

consent-based process is going to take time. And

it's not going to be fun, but it's the only way that's

going to be lasting.

MS. VEIL: Okay. Given your desire to

see the NRC more engaged on the back end of the fuel

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 31

cycle, do you support revisiting the NRC's decision

not to engage in rulemaking for risk-informed

reprocessing regulation?

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: So I like to say

that I'm not in my honeymoon period anymore, but there

was a lot of reading I had to do, and I'm still doing

since getting to the agency. And I have not delved

in on that one yet, so I can't fully answer it, but

I will take it for my homework.

MS. VEIL: All right. Next question:

Given the Commissioner's speech can you provide three

specific achievements that will meet his vision? I

guess they're talking to you because they're

certainly not asking me to give you -- so let's

rephrase this. Given your speech can you provide

three specific achievements that you -- that will

meet your vision within the time frame of your tenure?

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: I could probably

give you more than three, but I'll just throw some

out there. One, meeting our hiring and retention

goals, meeting our diversity and inclusion metrics,

integrating and updating environmental justice into

what we do at the agency, and radically improving

project management.

MS. VEIL: Right. That actually rolls

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 32

into the next question. That's a good one.

How do you feel environmental justice

will impact timeliness for reviews?

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: I don't think it

has to lengthen the duration of timely reviews. It

will require more work in the course of doing our

reviews, but if we're adequately staffed and we're

taking the environmental justice mission seriously,

then we'll fill the gaps where we need staffing on it

and get it done on a timeline that is appropriate

rather than lengthening it because of that. We're

already overdue in addressing environmental justice

and we shouldn't allow ourselves to drag our feet any

further.

MS. VEIL: Now, the next two questions

will be about newness. Thats the theme. So is there

anything you would like to say to engage our newest

employees?

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: Come up and talk

to me. Im new, too. Id love to share your

experience, understand where you came from, why you

chose the NRC, what you like and dont like. And

Ill share my views in return. Ive spent the

majority of my career in public service in government

agencies and like I love the family fel of the NRC,

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 33

but it is a challenging place to figure out and

navigate. And Im still learning. And I know how to

do this stuff and Im still learning.

MS. VEIL: And thats actually a great

segue to the next question. As the newest

Commissioner and a new NRC employee what are the

biggest challenges that youve seen and what

surprised you about the NRC that you didnt know when

you werent here?

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: I think one of our

biggest challenges is that were such a technically

and focused agency that weve lost our ability to

talk in plain language to everyday people, be it

acronyms or technical speak, and we need to get out

of that habit. And it doesn't mean that if that's -

- if you're a scientist or engineer and you don't

want to talk to the public that you're the one that

has to do it, but then we need to give you the support

around you to help you translate what you do in the

appropriate forum to reach a broader audience. We

overuse acronyms and science and technical speak way

too much. What was the other half of that question?

MS. VEIL: Well, just challenges. And I

think you rolled it into kind of that that is a

challenge. And I hope I got credit for talking about

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 34

NIMBY and --

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: Yes, yes, yes.

Well, I was going to say like we should have a rule

that there's no acronyms more than four letters.

NIMBY would break that, but everyone knows NIMBY.

But I mean, I've never -- I mean, so I'm just going

to say this straightway and praying the DOE folks in

the audience -- the NRC has made the DOE look easy to

navigate. That's been my experience. Okay? So let's

-- we ought to learn from that. A book this thick of

acronyms is bananas. It does not help us get where

we need to go.

MS. VEIL: I agree.

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: Yes.

MS. VEIL: And I think we have time for

one more question, and it may be a multi-part. So we

enjoyed your technical session yesterday on

transforming and modernizing the environmental review

process. Are there any questions that you didn't get

to answer? What's one thing that you think of that

we can do to transform environmental reviews?

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: I think the big

takeaway I was hoping was part of yesterday is that

the environment review process does not have to be

looked at in the strict confinement of NEPA or the

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309 www.nealrgross.com 35

act or regulation that you're working on. It can and

should be a broader ongoing conversation from the

pre-application stage throughout.

Yes, there's going to be guardrails here

and there depending on what kind of process is

happening on a given statute, in adjudications,

things like that, but we need to stop being afraid of

talking about protection of the environment and

communicating as appropriate with communities so they

have trust that what we're doing, while technical, is

right. And I think that's the secret sauce to doing

what we're going to do for the years to come.

MS. VEIL: Well, again, congratulations

on the milestone. It feels great, doesn't it, being

done?

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: Yes. It's pretty

good, yes.

MS. VEIL: Yes.

COMMISSIONER CROWELL: I'll be at the bar

if anyone wants to meet me. Thanks, Andrea.

MS. VEIL: And with that, we close the

session.

(Whereupon, the above-entitled matter

went off the record at 9:57 a.m.)

NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1716 14th STREET, N.W., SUITE 200 (202) 234-4433 www.nealrgross.com WASHINGTON, D.C. 20009-4309