ML23235A213

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 1, Control Room Habitability at Light-Water Nuclear Power Reactors - Periodic Review
ML23235A213
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/13/2023
From: Derek Scully
NRC/NRR/DSS/SCPB
To:
Shared Package
ML23235A174 List:
References
RG-1.196, Rev 1
Download: ML23235A213 (2)


Text

Regulatory Guide Periodic Review Regulatory Guide Number: 1.196, Revision 1

Title:

Control Room Habitability at Light-Water Nuclear Power Reactors Office/Division/Branch:

NRR/DSS/SCPB Technical Lead:

Derek Scully Staff Action Decided:

Reviewed with issues identified for future consideration

1.

What are the known technical or regulatory issues with the current version of the Regulatory Guide (RG)?

No significant issues were identified, and the following minor issues were identified for future consideration:

Update the following references:

o #3 Regulatory Guide 1.52 to Revision 4, September 2012 o #7 Regulatory Guide 1.78 to Revision 2, December 2021 o #8 NUREG 1431 to Revision 5, September 2021 o #9 NUREG 1430 to Revision 5, September 2021 o #10 NUREG 1432 to Revision 5, September 2021 o #11 NUREG 1433 to Revision 5, September 2021 o #12 NUREG 1434 to Revision 5, September 2021 o #14 RG 1.140 to Revision 3, August 2016 o #15 RG 1.194 date to June 2003 Add - NUREG-2194, Standard Technical Specifications, Westinghouse Advanced Passive 1000 (AP1000) Plants, Volume 1, Revision 0, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, April 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Number ML16110A277) as Reference #13:

o Renumbering current References 13-15 o Add Reference 13 to the list of STSs in Section 2.7.2 The prior periodic review (ML17047A180) was considered and this review is an update to the issues previously identified.

2.

What is the impact on internal and external stakeholders of not updating the RG for the known issues, in terms of anticipated numbers of licensing and inspection activities over the next several years?

No significant impact noted.

3.

What is an estimate of the level of effort needed to address identified issues in terms of full-time equivalent (FTE) and contractor resources?

Not applicable (see response to Question 5).

4.

Based on the answers to the questions above, what is the staff action for this guide (Reviewed with no issues identified, Reviewed with issues identified for future consideration, Revise, or Withdraw)?

Reviewed with issues identified for future consideration.

5.

Provide a conceptual plan and timeframe to address the issues identified during the review.

The staff has no plans to revise this guide.

NOTE: This review was conducted in August 2023 and reflects the staffs plans as of that date. These plans are tentative and are subject to change.