ML23213A228

Rulemaking-Final Rule-GAO Forms Increase in the Maximum Amount of Primary Nuclear Liability Insurance

ML23213A228
Person / Time
Issue date:	01/01/2024
From:	De Jesus M Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
To:
References
RIN 3150-AL02, NRC-2023-0130
Download: ML23213A228 (1)

Text

41217 Submis s i on of Fe d e ral Rule s Unde r the C o n g ressional Review Act President of the Senate Speaker of the House of Representatives GAO Please fill the circles electronically or with black pen or #2 pencil.

1. Name of Department or Agency 2. Subdivision or Office US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguard

3. Rule Title Increase in the Maximum Amount of Primary Nuclear Liability Insurance

4. Rule Identification Number (RIN) or Other Unique Identifier (if applicable)

5. Major Rule Non-major Rule

6. Final Rule Other

7. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency solicit public com m ents? Yes No N/A

8. Priority of Regulation (fill in one)

Economically Significant; or Routine and Frequent or Significant; or Informational/Adm inistrative/Other Substantive, Nonsignificant (Do not complete the other side of this form if filled in above.)

9. Effective Date (if applicable) January 1, 2024

10. Is a concise Summary of the Rule provided? Yes No Submitted by: (signature)

Eugene Dacus Name: ___________________________________________

Director, Office of Congressional Affairs

Title:

For Congressional Use Only:

Date Received:

Com m ittee of Jurisdiction:

11/09/99

41217 Yes No N/A A. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?

B. W ith respect to this rule, at the final rulemaking stage, did your agency

1. certify that the rule would not have a significant econom ic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?

2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?

C. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under

§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?

D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?

E. Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?

F. Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?

E.O. 13132, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify) 11/09/99

41217 Submis s i on of Fe d e ral Rule s Unde r the C o n g ressional Review Act President of the Senate Speaker of the House of Representatives GAO Please fill the circles electronically or with black pen or #2 pencil.

1. Name of Department or Agency 2. Subdivision or Office US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguard

3. Rule Title Increase in the Maximum Amount of Primary Nuclear Liability Insurance

4. Rule Identification Number (RIN) or Other Unique Identifier (if applicable)

5. Major Rule Non-major Rule

6. Final Rule Other

7. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency solicit public com m ents? Yes No N/A

8. Priority of Regulation (fill in one)

Economically Significant; or Routine and Frequent or Significant; or Informational/Adm inistrative/Other Substantive, Nonsignificant (Do not complete the other side of this form if filled in above.)

9. Effective Date (if applicable) January 1, 2024

10. Is a concise Summary of the Rule provided? Yes No Submitted by: (signature)

Eugene Dacus Name: ___________________________________________

Director, Office of Congressional Affairs

Title:

For Congressional Use Only:

Date Received:

Com m ittee of Jurisdiction:

11/09/99

41217 Yes No N/A A. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?

B. W ith respect to this rule, at the final rulemaking stage, did your agency

1. certify that the rule would not have a significant econom ic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?

2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?

C. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under

§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?

D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?

E. Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?

F. Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?

E.O. 13132, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify) 11/09/99

41217 Submis s i on of Fe d e ral Rule s Unde r the C o n g ressional Review Act President of the Senate Speaker of the House of Representatives GAO Please fill the circles electronically or with black pen or #2 pencil.

1. Name of Department or Agency 2. Subdivision or Office US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguard

3. Rule Title Increase in the Maximum Amount of Primary Nuclear Liability Insurance

4. Rule Identification Number (RIN) or Other Unique Identifier (if applicable)

5. Major Rule Non-major Rule

6. Final Rule Other

7. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency solicit public com m ents? Yes No N/A

8. Priority of Regulation (fill in one)

Economically Significant; or Routine and Frequent or Significant; or Informational/Adm inistrative/Other Substantive, Nonsignificant (Do not complete the other side of this form if filled in above.)

9. Effective Date (if applicable) January 1, 2024

10. Is a concise Summary of the Rule provided? Yes No Submitted by: (signature)

Eugene Dacus Name: ___________________________________________

Director, Office of Congressional Affairs

Title:

For Congressional Use Only:

Date Received:

Com m ittee of Jurisdiction:

11/09/99

41217 Yes No N/A A. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?

B. W ith respect to this rule, at the final rulemaking stage, did your agency

1. certify that the rule would not have a significant econom ic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?

2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?

C. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under

§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?

D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?

E. Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?

F. Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?

E.O. 13132, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify) 11/09/99