ML23089A028
| ML23089A028 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07201026 |
| Issue date: | 03/10/2023 |
| From: | NRC/OCIO |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML23089A026 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-2023-000071 | |
| Download: ML23089A028 (1) | |
Text
Paul M. Blanch Energy Consultant Tuesday, February 14, 2023 FOIA Office United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington D.C. 20555-0001
Subject:
FOIA for documents related to 72 CFR 122(l)
I was not able to register on your NRC FOIA website and never received a password.
See enclosed SER dated January 25, 2002 and titled :
SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT Docket No. 72-1026 FuelSolutionsTM Spent Fuel Management System Certificate of Compliance No. 1026 Amendment No. 2 January 25, 2002 Within this NRC document are the following statements:
Item 1 2.0 STRUCTURAL "The NRC staff reviewed the proposed changes in the W74 canister TS, Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.3.2 and LCO 3.3.3. Specifically, BFS requested to change the required action from "Return CANISTER to the Fuel Building and remove all fuel assemblies" to Return CANISTER to TRANSFER CASK.
Please provide a copy of the NRC staff review cited above.
Item 2 "This cask system is being used at the Big Rock Point (BRP) Plant, which is being decommissioned. As part of this process, the spent fuel pool will be taken out of service.
As an alternative to moving the fuel to the spent fuel pool if there is a problem with a storage cask, the applicant has proposed to move the fuel canister to the transfer cask (within 30 days) and to return the canister to a repaired or replacement storage cask (within 270 days). To justify this approach, the applicant stated that the current and revised thermal and structural evaluations demonstrate that the transfer cask would provide acceptable storage of the canister for the proposed extended time."
1
Paul M. Blanch Energy Consultant Please provide a copy of the NRC of the "current and revised thermal and structural evaluations demonstrate that the transfer cask would provide acceptable storage of the canister for the proposed extended time as stated above.
Item 3 These changes are similar to the changes analyzed in TS 3.3.2, and are supported by the same thermal and structural evaluations. All of the evaluations discussed in that review apply to this change request also. Therefore, these changes are acceptable. Please provide a copy of these thermal and structural evaluations.
Provide a copy of the above thermal and structural evaluations if different from Item 2.
Item 4 Please provide a copy of Revision 0 (or original) to ISG 2, which its on the same topic. I was not able to locate this revision within ADAMS Very truly yours, Paul M. Blanch (b) (6)