ML23075A072
| ML23075A072 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/23/2023 |
| From: | Mauricio Gutierrez NRC/RES/DE/CIB |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML23075A054 | List: |
| References | |
| RG 1.22, Rev 0 | |
| Download: ML23075A072 (1) | |
Text
Periodic Review - RG 1.22 Revision 0
Regulatory Guide Number: 1.22, Revision 0
Title:
Periodic Testing of Protection System Actuation Functio ns
Office/division/branch: RES/DE/ICEEB Technical Lead: Mauricio Gutierrez
Staff Action Decided: Reviewed with no issues identified
- 1. What are the known technical or regulatory issues with the current version of the Regulatory Guide (RG)?
No technical or regulatory issues were identified. RG 1.22 was issued in February 1972 and is still acceptable. The regulatory guide describes design criteria and preferred methods for including actuation devices in the periodic tests o f protection systems. The regulatory positions in the guide use a performance-based appro ach to equipment testing parameters by describing the desired performance levels while allowing the licensee to develop site-specific methodologies to meet regulat ory requirements.
- 2. What is the impact on internal and external stakeholders of not updating the RG for the known issues, in terms of anticipated numbers of licens ing and inspection activities over the next several years?
As no technical or regulatory issues were identified, there is no impact to internal or external stakeholders resulting from these activities.
- 3. What is an estimate of the level of effort needed to address identified issues in terms of full-time equivalent (FTE) and contractor resources?
As no technical or regulatory issues were identified, no resour ces are required.
- 4. Based on the answers to the questions above, what is the sta ff action for this guide (Reviewed with no issues identified, Reviewed with issues identified for future consideration, Revise, or Withdraw)?
Reviewed with no issues identified.
- 5. Provide a conceptual plan and timeframe to address the issu es identified during the review.
This is not applicable since no issues were identified during t he review.
NOTE: This review was conducted in March 2023 and reflects the staffs plans as of that date. These plans are tentative and subject to cha nge.