ML23045A223
| ML23045A223 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/28/2022 |
| From: | Rachel Johnson NRC/NMSS/DMSST/ASPB |
| To: | |
| References | |
| Download: ML23045A223 (15) | |
Text
The IMPEP Basics
Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
Periodic Review
Direction and Guidance https://scp.nrc.gov/
MD 5.6 SA-100 TI-003
Performance Indicators COMMON
- Technical Staffing and Training,
- Status of Materials Inspection Program
- Technical Quality of Inspections
- Technical Quality of Licensing Actions
- Technical Quality of Incident and Allegation Activities NON-COMMON
- Legislation, Regulations, and other Program Elements (LROPE) [formerly known as Compatibility],
- Sealed Source and Device Evaluation Program
- Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Program
- Uranium Recovery Program
Performance Indicator Ratings
- Satisfactory
- Satisfactory but Needs Improvement
- Unsatisfactory
Recommendations Constructive feedback to promote improvement This can serve as the basis for developing recommendations for corrective actions.
The team should seek to identify and understand the root cause(s) of the programmatic performance issues.
Criteria and Examples of Recommendations can be found in the IMPEP Toolbox on the state communications portal Web site.
Overall IMPEP Review Findings ADEQUACY
- Adequate to Protect Public Health and Safety
- Adequate, but Needs Improvement
- Not Adequate to Protect Public Health and Safety COMPATIBILITY
- Compatible
- Not Compatible
Elements of an IMPEP Review BEFORE THE ON-SITE REVIEW ON-SITE REVIEW WEEK AFTER THE ON-SITE REVIEW
IMPEP Mantra
Preparation
On-Site Member Conduct
- Be courteous, professional, honest, and prepared
- Minimize impact on the Program
- Use time wisely - time is very precious
- Be ready to assist other team members, if necessary
- Focus on health and safety and performance
- Avoid the appearance of conflicts of interest, personal agendas and/or opinions
Timeline Draft final report Draft IMPEP Report issued for factual comment 45 days after exit meeting.
Comment period State or Region comment response to NRC 28 days after issued Draft Report.
Proposed final report Proposed final report to MRB at least 7 days prior to the MRB Meeting.
MRB meeting MRB meeting 90 - 105 days after exit meeting.
Issue final report Final IMPEP report issued 30 days after the MRB Meeting (CBJ metric).
Summary
Thank You