ML23045A223
| ML23045A223 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/28/2022 |
| From: | Rachel Johnson NRC/NMSS/DMSST/ASPB |
| To: | |
| References | |
| Download: ML23045A223 (15) | |
Text
The IMPEP Basics
Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
Periodic Review Direction and Guidance https://scp.nrc.gov/
MD 5.6 SA-100 TI-003
Performance Indicators COMMON NON-COMMON
- Technical Staffing and Training,
- Legislation, Regulations, and other Program Elements (LROPE) [formerly known as
- Status of Materials Inspection Program Compatibility],
- Technical Quality of Inspections
- Sealed Source and Device Evaluation Program
- Technical Quality of Licensing Actions
- Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Program
- Technical Quality of Incident and Allegation
- Uranium Recovery Program Activities
Performance Indicator
- Satisfactory Ratings
- Satisfactory but Needs Improvement
- Unsatisfactory
Recommendations Constructive feedback to promote improvement This can serve as the basis for developing recommendations for corrective actions.
The team should seek to identify and understand the root cause(s) of the programmatic performance issues.
Criteria and Examples of Recommendations can be found in the IMPEP Toolbox on the state communications portal Web site.
Overall IMPEP Review Findings ADEQUACY COMPATIBILITY
- Adequate to Protect Public Health and
- Compatible Safety
- Not Compatible
- Adequate, but Needs Improvement
- Not Adequate to Protect Public Health and Safety
Elements of an IMPEP Review B E FO R E T H E O N - S I T E ON-SITE REVIEW WEEK REVIEW AFTER THE ON-SITE REVIEW
IMPEP Mantra Preparation On-Site Member Conduct
- Be courteous, professional, honest, and prepared
- Minimize impact on the Program
- Use time wisely - time is very precious
- Be ready to assist other team members, if necessary
- Focus on health and safety and performance
- Avoid the appearance of conflicts of interest, personal agendas and/or opinions
Timeline Draft IMPEP Report issued for Proposed final report to MRB at Final IMPEP report issued 30 factual comment 45 days after least 7 days prior to the MRB days after the MRB Meeting exit meeting. Meeting. (CBJ metric).
Proposed final Draft final report Comment period MRB meeting Issue final report report State or Region comment MRB meeting 90 - 105 days response to NRC 28 days after after exit meeting.
issued Draft Report.
Summary Thank You