ML22339A084

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LTR-22-0299 Letter to A. Christopher Bakken, III, Exec Vice President, Nuclear Operations and Chief Nuclear Officer, Entergy from D. Dorman, EDO Request for NRC Disclosure of Non-Discrimination Investigation Reports to Licensees at the Pre-
ML22339A084
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/19/2022
From: Dan Dorman
NRC/EDO
To: Bakken A
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Shared Package
ML22291A452 List:
References
LTR-22-0299-1-OE
Download: ML22339A084 (3)


Text

December 19, 2022 A. Christopher Bakken III Executive Vice President Entergy Infrastructure Entergy Nuclear 1340 Echelon Parkway Jackson, MS 39213

Dear Christopher Bakken:

On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your letter of October 12, 2022, (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)

Accession No. ML22291A451) concerning the release of investigation-based information prior to a pre-decisional enforcement conference (PEC). In your letter, you requested that the Commission reconsider the NRCs current practice of not releasing investigative reports for non-discrimination cases to licensees at the pre-decisional stage of the enforcement process.

The Commission originally considered the release of investigation-based information to licensees prior to a PEC in 1999.1 The staff and Commission weighed the potential benefit of making additional information available to improve communication at a PEC against the need to protect the federal investigative and fact-finding process. This issue was addressed not only in the 1999 review, but also, as you noted in your letter, in the 2002 Discrimination Task Group report,2 as well as a 2005 Commission paper.3 Each of the three previous reviews included a discussion of the pros and cons of releasing the Office of Investigations (OI) Report of Investigation (ROI) to a licensee prior to a PEC and recommended that providing a factual summary4 of the ROI would achieve the appropriate balance in non-discrimination cases. In each case, the Commission approved this recommendation.5 This decision remains as the Commission policy to provide factual summaries of an ROI only.

1 See generally, SECY-99-019, Release of Investigative Information from Office of Investigations Reports to Licensees and Subjects of Investigations for Purposes of Predecisional Enforcement Conferences, January 20, 1999 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12265A467) 2 SECY-02-0166, Policy Options and Recommendations for Revising the NRC's Process for Handling Discrimination Issues, Attachment 1: Discrimination Task Group Report, 59, April 2002 (ADAMS Accession No. ML022120514).

3 SECY-05-0213, Policy Options and Recommendations for the Release of Reports Prepared by the Office of Investigations, November 17, 2005 (ADAMS Accession No. ML060050271).

4 As described in the Enforcement Manual (ADAMS Accession No. ML22056A177), Part II, Section 1.7, Factual Summaries, factual summaries provide enough information to permit a licensee or individual to understand the basis for the violation and independently verify the facts of the case while also protecting the sources of the investigation.

5 SRM-SECY-99-0019, Staff Requirements - SECY 99-019 - Release of Investigative Information from Office of Investigations Reports to Licensees and Subjects of Investigations for Purposes of Predecisional Enforcement Conferences, May 27, 1999 (ADAMS Accession No. ML003752007); SRM-SECY-02-0166, Staff Requirements -

Policy Options and Recommendations for Revising the NRC's Process for Handling Discrimination Issues, March 26, 2003 (ADAMS Accession No. ML030850783); SRM-SECY-05-0213, Staff Requirements - Policy Options and Recommendations for the Release of Reports Prepared by the Office of Investigations, January 5, 2006 (ADAMS Accession No. ML060060088).

C. Bakken 2 The bases for the Commissions policy to not release investigation-based information prior to a PEC for non-discrimination cases remains valid. The use of factual summaries allows us to share key information concerning the case for the licensee to understand while allowing us to protect the identity of allegers and witnesses. Your letter did not provide additional information not previously considered by the NRC. Therefore, we do not plan to change our policy for non-discrimination cases.

Sincerely, Signed by Dorman, Dan on 12/19/22 Daniel H. Dorman Executive Director for Operations

C. Bakken 3

SUBJECT:

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR NRC DISCLOSURE ON NON-DISCRIMINATION INVESTIGATION REPORTS TO LICENSEES AT THE PRE-DECISIONAL STAGE OF THE ENFORMCEMENT PROCESS DATED:

December 19, 2022 DISTRIBUTION: LTR-22-0299 PUBLIC OE r/f RidsEdoMailCenter Resource RidsOEMailCenter Resource MLombard, OE JPeralta, OE DJones, OE THiggs, OI JPrichard, OI LBaer, OGC MSimon, OGC SMorris, RIV JGroom, RIV ADAMS Accession Numbers: ML22291A452 (Pkg); ML22339A084 (Ltr)

OFFICE OE/AEA OE/BC OI/DD OGC NAME NHilton JPeralta JPrichard MSimon DATE 12/1/2022 12/1/2022 12/1/2022 12/14/2022 OFFICE OE/OD NRC/EDO NAME MLombard D. Dorman DATE 12/14/2022 12/19/22 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY