ML22280A181
ML22280A181 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Comanche Peak |
Issue date: | 02/01/2022 |
From: | Dennis Galvin NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL4 |
To: | |
Galvin D, NRR/DORL/LPL4 | |
Shared Package | |
ML22277A832 | List: |
References | |
EPID L-2022-LRO-0015 | |
Download: ML22280A181 (238) | |
Text
0-1{~,,~l~;i;~!~~j:..: ;:_;:"; \JV,, r lt\J!t*ON ao.un ...,.H.
OKLAHOMA NEW Mqrco co 0 '0 tr:
0-......_.
t-0 AO Mdes SCALE 10 0 10 20 30 40 so 60 70 MILES 8 AA A A E::--:::--3 E::--:::--3 SITE COORDINATES UNIT NO. UNIT NO. 2 TEXAS GRID Y=229,723.96 Y=230,010.86
( FEET) X= 1 , 911 , 921 . 11 X=l ,911 ,951.27 U.T.M. GRID N=3,573,903 N=3,573,991 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
(METERS) E=614,393 E=614,401 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (ZONE 14)
UNITS 1 and 2 LATITUDE 32°17 1 52.02 11 32°17 54.85 1 11 LONGITUDE 97°47 06.15 1 11 97°47 05.79 1 11 SITE LOCATION FIGURE 2.1-1
~,-i r,***
j / /
/
~- (/' /
~ ',__./'
/
/ ..
{ ~
'; *. ~ , ROA[, fASEM(NT CEMETAAY )
CREEK RESERVOIR /(,;
. . ~ \\
NO' PART(), S!Tf ( .
PROPlRTY *
~lf_,;
~
I
[ ~_/-. __ _v )
~v --..J
/
TOl.l.lS.F RV , CO. *IN TIIAC, - ~ ,
AMENDMENT 89 AUGUST 20, 1993 y COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S
---HCLUSION AREA FI\IAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PLANT ACC[SS ROAD UNITS 1 and 2
- - * - - - - ROAD [A$[MENT
- - HOOD/S~ERVELL COONTY l!HE SITE AREA FIGURE 2. I 2
/
r- -- --
/
/
/
/
SQUAW CREEK RESERVOIR ALL EXCLUSION AREA SURFACE RIGHTS ARE OWNED BY THE APPLICANTS \
\
(
I I \....
I I
I
\
/
/
/
/
TO ~- 1, l l,f. /
RL CO. *I* TIW:,K /
AMENDMENT 87 DECEMBER 18, 1992 LUOD
- - - - UCLV~IO!I AA!:~
COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 lCAU o ,oo 1200 ,toe 2~ rur OWNERSHIP OF SURFACE RIGHTS IN THE EXCLUSION AREA FIGURE 2. I - 2 A
/
/
/
/
/
~l=t
~\
l( ~TAl'f SQUAW CREEK RESERVOIR
"-*t',
....,/ 1 I
I
(
I TO l.T. I l,F.
In'. co. ,-iiir~~
~----=----'~
AMENDMENT 87 DECEMBER 18, 1992 LEGEND EXCLUSION AREA COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
PLANT ACCESS ROAD FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- - - - - - - - - LONE STAR GAS 6" PIPELINE UNITS 1 and 2
- - - - - - - WEST TEXAS GULF 26" Oil PIPELINE t200 , &oo HOO fE£T EASEMENTS WITHIN THE EXCLUSION AREA FIGURE 2.1-2 8
.'\ -~ #~
-~,,.
\ \ "\ '\
IMM'.U ,011t ..... IIIIAL EX"-.OlltATION MAY K - - - - ,
Al.LOWl:D SQUAW CREEK RESERVOtR UTBML MAZMD \
AfE ZONE
\
/ \_
/ ----
(
I I
I ll A.T. I S.F.
M. Cl. IN11.ac AMENDMENT 89 AUGUST 20, 1993 LUIIII IMMSS '°" llt!N("AL EXltLOtlATION MAY IE - - ~
- - - - ucu111* ~
ALLOWED COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
l'lMT .-ca:ss - FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- S S A"O EGA[ SS IIIGHTS fOII Mltt[IIAL IIITU!t:HS UNITS 1 and 2 OUTITANOIIIG KALI 0 - IHC 1111 J . . . ,.fT EXCLUSION AREA MINERAL RIGHTS F!Cilff 2.1-2 C~
i
)
\\ i 1/i/ <*.)/to
)
)40
- y*~_
, \ ,,,
~ p lJECTED KEY:
,jMATED 1976 POPULATION CTED 1980 POPULATION 2000 POPULATION iJ~ ~
\ )
.._:,.i,._ *NOTE. 1970 AND PROJECTED 2020 POPULATION
'""\ \ ...) FROM O TO 1 MILE IS NIL *
- _j/
67
\
CLESURN
_,,\:TATE PARK
\
\ ".~~y
'X~ IN MILES
\(
0 2 3 4 5
',~-,: ~--c*,.s:..**
98 106 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
117 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION BY SECTOR-AREA s 1--------:--::-- O TO 10 M,_1_:1I~L=ES'='.__.------..
FIGURE 2.1-3
N GRAFORD*
DALLAS ENE WNW
~
RANGER WAXAHACHIE w E
~ITALY HILLSBORO r ESE KEY:
20
~T 60 ESTJMATE!.i 1976 POPLLAT10f.
1/){i;; POFl,l,ATION 2000 P-OPutATl ON
REFERENCE:
THE BASE fOR THlS MAP WAS ?RE PARED FROM PORT IONS OF THE FOLLOWING U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY I 250,000 MAPS ABILENE, 1954, REVISED 1965 COMANCHE BROWNWOOD, 1954, REVISED 1964 DALLAS. 1954. REV I SEO 1963 SHERMAN, 1954, REVISED 1963
\ WACO, 1954, REVISED 1963
\
\
SW \
\
\
\
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 0 tO 20 MILE;S
!!!!'~"lii***~iil""l----iiiiiil'~~~~~lllllj UNITS 1 and 2 POPULATlctl DiSTRIBlTTON BY SECTOR-AREA 10 TO 50 Ml LES s
FIGURE 2.1-4
\
\
, -I LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EXCLUSION AREA
- it..._' ' t
'\ .t 1[,*\ .
__;;r** 4< * ,;,1, '
- \ ) '-\,'
-'*-1" -'f
- /.
r-*:)',
,\, ,,*r j '. <\. * * ~-* *(. .
.~-:**** :, ***** ./. (, .. ;~; : ~--~:: : : COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
,,.,..:,r-;--"""'-' ( FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
/i.
.. ! ,i,'! * -: ; *i
- UNITS 1 and 2
'****** ... ~
'it~""'~ . ,.J(. ~ ~\V t' ..
I IIILI LOW POPULATION ZONE
,1 ~ ~ d,
,_i _;;_;,,-..,.._Jr * ,.--\-4;;..
,. _c
.("'
97°47. JO" \ /
r*~-
. 0-4 111 LES FIGURE 2,1-5
10,000,000 ------------------r----..-------,----
5,000,000 1------4-----l------+-------+-----+------------ll------------l 0
1/
1,000,000 ASSUMED UNIFORM POPULATION DENSITY OF 500 PEOPLE/ SQUARE MILE 0/j 500,000 z
0 j:::
c,:
c..
0 0..
WJ
> 100,00 s
- i:
u 50,000 0
I ~ CPSES CUMULATIVE POPULATION CURVE, 1980 I
I 0 f
10 5,000 l--------4-----lJ-------1-----1------+-----+---------l------------l
(:)
I I
- 0 1,000 ...___ __..!...___.__---1,.
I _ _ _........_ _ _..J.__ _ _,.___ _ ____,1_ _ ___,
0 10 20 30 40 50 MILES FROM CPSES SITE COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 1980 CUMULATIVE POPULATION FIGURE 2,1-6
10,000,000 . - - - - - - , - - - - - , - - - - - . . - - - - - . . - - - - - . - - - - . , . - - - - - - - - ,
S,OOO ,OOO ~-AS-SU-M-ED_U--J-N-1F-O-RM_P_O-PU--4LA_T_IO_N_D_EN_S_IT+-Y-----;-i-/
91* i OF 1000 PEOPLE / SQUARE MI LE 0 : i
/j I/
~ / !
0 1,000,000 l - - - - - - + - - - - + - - - - - F - - - + - - - - - - + - - - . 0 - - - - - - + - - - - - - I 500,000 0
- z 0
~
0.
0 0..
u.J
> 100,000
~ 0 I
....l 1------1--i u 50,000 0 CPSES CUMULATIVE POPULATION CURVE, 2020 0
I 5,000 1 - - - - - + + - - l - - - + - - - - + - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - + - - - - + - - - - - - - 1 0
0 1,000 ,..__ ____.,.___..___--'-_ _ __.__ ____.__ _ _ _ _ _ _....___ ____.
0 10 20 30 40 50 MILES FROM CPSES SITE COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 2020 CUMULATIVE POPULATION FIGURE 2,1-7
/ ....
. o*
. ~
-I
- 0
- :D :
'ADO..___'\:'. *v,c,o~ \~:s KEY
- AIRPORTS STATUTE MILES 0 10 20
- : : :~~ REFUELING TRACKS COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
VICTOR AIR LANES FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 AMENDMENT 82 JULY 31, 1991 AIR TRAFFIC OTO 20 MILES REFERENCE; This map was prepared from portions of sectional oeronoutiecl charts, Son Antonio a Ft.Worth. FIGURE 2. 2-1
0 K LAH OM A.
0 STUDY REG ION - I =-TA LIMITS ~
- Ml DLAND TEXAS SAN ANTONIO STATUTE MILES 0 100 200 iw-----t e----1 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 CLIMATOLOGICAL STATIONS AND REGION FIGURE 2. 3-1
_)
0
/
r---+---
7 0
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 AIR POLLUTION POTENTIAL NUMBER OF DAYS IN 5 YEARS
Reference:
Holzworth, G.C., 1972 FIGURE 2. 3- 2
FORTWORTH DALLAS SITE CLEBURNE DU TEPHENVIL SCALE IN MILES 0 20 40 60 80 100 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOCAL METEOROLOGICAL STATIONS FIGURE 2. 3-3
t~\J SCALE IN Ml LES 0 0.5 1 2 8 00
\..
COMANCHE PEAK S. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHY OF THE COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION AREA s FIGURE 2, 3-4
1000 1000
_j
(/)
2 900 NW SITE SE 900
":J
(/)
2 GRADE i,--:
i,--: LL LL 800 800 z z 0 0 I-
.:= <:(
<:(
700 700 w w ..J
_j w w
600 600 5 4 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) 1000 1000 NNW SSE _j
(/)
(/)
-2 I-'
LL 900 SITE GRADE 900 2 t-=
LL z
0 800 RESERVOIR 800 z0 I- -
<:( I-
<:(
> 700 700 >
w w
_j _J w w 600 600 5 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DI STANCE FROM STATION {MILES)
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN IN FIGURE 2.3-4 FIGURE 2. 3-5
1000 1000
....J E -
....J
(/)
, SITE 900
~~ 900 ~
Cf)
~ GRADE I-
~ LL LL z 800 800 z0 0
I-I- <(
<(
> 700 700 >
w w ....J
....J w w
600 600 5 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) 1000 1000
....J
(/)
~ 900 SITE ESE -....J
(/)
900 ~
WNW GRADE
.,_: ~
LL RESERVOIR-I--- SQUAW CREEK LL z 800 800 z 0
.::<(
> 700
--~---::J DAM 700 0
I-
<(
w >
w
....J w ....J w
600 600 5 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES)
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN IN FIGURE 2. 3-4 FIGURE 2.3-6
1000 1000 SW NE :J
_J (/)
(/)
~
900 SITE GRADE 900 i--:
LL i--:
LL RESERVOIR 800 800 z z0 ~*W*:W.:*W~*..,.....; 0 f-f- <i
<! 700 700 >
w w
_J
...J w
w 600 600 5 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) 1000 1000
- JCl)
WSW ENE -...J
(/)
~ 900
~
s: ~
900 ~
i--: s:
LL ci: ~
z0 800 RESERVOIR V) 800 z f- ~ ~ 0 w
...J 700 ~
Qj
~
Qj 700 f-w
...J w w 600 600 5 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES)
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN
_ _ _I_N_EIGURE 2.3-4)
FIGURE 2. 3- 7
1000 1000 s ':J
..J (/)
~
(/) SITE ~
900 GRADE 900
~
- s:: r=
r=
LL ii: LL 800 800 z z 0 0 I-I- <!
<! 700 700 >
w w
..J
..J w
w 600 600 5 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) 1000 1000
':J
(/)
SSW NNE -. .J
(/)
~
I-LL 900 SITE GRADE 900
-~
~
LL z- 800 800 z 0 0 I-
<( r-w 700 700 >
..J w w ..J w
600 600 5 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES)
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN IN FIGURE 2.3-4) _ _ _
FIGURE 2. 3-8
N WAXAHACHIE
/'A"'-~
a--..._ /
- ~EFrlENVILLE ~'
SCALE I~ MILES 0 10 20 30 40 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 GEilERP.L DPOG RAP~ IC FEri TU RES TO 50 r'.ILES FIGURE 2.3-9
NE WNW w 21°/o
\--- --
wsw\
s 10 METER 60 METER COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS AT CPSES FIGURE 2.3-10
N NE W 20% E ESE s
-DALLAS LOVE FIELD (1 MAY 1972 - 31 DEC. 1972)
---COMANCHE PEAK (15 MAY 1972 - 31 DEC. 1972)
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS FIGURE 2. 3-11
~Vl
...JP
,-:z:
,-o N 23Cl,000 .,,
we..
/BOo~~*/-
1
/EVAPORAT!ON POND NO.
.. TO BE CLOSED AND ABANDONED IN PLACE
~-
/
\
\I ,// .,
£QIJ/\Ll~*';:,0,
- H c
,;£ I ; ;\tiD SP LLL-"'
/ . CRtY ELE~
. / / ____
//
i ...
J<
/ (_1~ AMENDMENT 87 DECEMBER 18, 1992
\(/
I~ ,
"---- RECREATIONAL FACILITY AND COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
SECURITY TRAINING AREA
\ FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FACILITY PLAN INCLUDING LOCATION OF METEOROLOGICAL TOWER 0 50(
FIGURE 2, 3-12
CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-13 This Figure has been deleted. 94 Amendment 94 August 1. 1996
CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-14 91 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994
CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-15 91 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994
CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-16 91 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994
CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-17 91 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994
N COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DILUTION FACTORS-LONG TERM (x 10-7 SECONDS/METER 3) 0 TO 5 MILES FIGURE 2. 3-18
s COMANCHE PE AK S E. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DILUTION FACTORS-LONG TERM (x 10- 8 SECONDS/METER3) 0 TO 50 MILES FIGURE 2. 3-19
LEGEND
--CATCHMENT BOUNDARY
- - - SUB-CATCHMENT BOUNDARY
- * *
- SPECIAL SUB-CATCHMENT FOR SAFE SHUT-DOWN DAM UN-I SUB-CATCHMENT IDENTIFICATION (WHERE NO STREAM IDENTIFICATION GIVEN)
A USG S STREAM GAUGING STATION NOTE RESERVOIR LEVEL SHOWN AT 780' THIS IS A FLOOD STAGE ONLY NORMAL OPERATING LEVEL IS BETWEEN 770' AND 775' SQUAW CREEK DAM 0 2000 4000 6000 FT
!""l""'l"iiii-~"iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~""'"""""""'!i REFER::NCE THE BASE FOR T>i!S MAP WAS PREPARED FROM PORTIONS m THE: ~OLLOWING USG S QUADRANGLE MAPS NE.IVO, 196\; PALUXY, !9GI; 11ILL CITY, 196 1; TOLAR, 1961; GRANBURY, i96! COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SQLA'./ CREEK REilf(/01 R :A TCIWENT FIGURE 2,4-1
Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 C FR 2 .390 COMANCHE PEAIC S.E.S.
flW. StffTY NW.'VSS AEPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ROOF CftAINS OF SAFEGUARD, MJXI..JNff 81 FUEL. llll.OING R(UIE 2.4-2
~ t-+'-~**____ --~ '31'- e+ ~ '1.9*-.o" r* 8 i
- . I 1":*:*~~~c".--~~-~-~-,---"'------------------------------~-.....,.,.------1*"
- .:~',*;:~: ,',.,;*.*.*;: (' *.*, :.',*"*.*. ..* ..... ~- ~31'.*.*:I_*,~.*.,.~: ~I..~~
.. f{:.;)
b
~.:..1.1.. i I ,-.> 0!
- 1. .:i
<"I 18 I i 11 I
SWITCHG,EAR 6cJILDINC, PART ?LAN - OPi::RATlfsG FLOOR.
@ E'L 83:,'7l0" UNIT,. '2 ':o<<i!TCf<iGt;:-t..R BcJllD1N<'.,
PA'?T ~LA."1 - OPERATING FL;'.>OR
~ G-1... e>?.i:!>'-10~
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SWITCHGEAR BUILDING ROOF DRAINS FIGURE 2.4*:3
Information Withheld in Accordance with 1'o CFR 2.390 COMANCHE PEAK S.E. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF SITE FIGURE 2 . 4 -4
- _....,\
\
\ _____ -1...,,
~~""'-
- ---\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\--- - \ -
\ \
\ \ 1 \
\
\----- --
l-- --,
\
\
\ ---
\
\\
+--_ -
\
\ \
-3/4-_
\
__ -\-----
\
\
I ---------
\
\-
\
\
\
\
\
---.Y" -- \ ------1..---
\ ...>---
\
\
..J.--
\
\--.....--
0 10 20 30 40 50Mrles
"'l--'l""l.....c+/-ii.l'
.....11111,....;,1oo;~ . . _ _ ,
REFERENCE The base for !his mop was prepared from o port ion of the Texas Hig hwoy mop, prepared for COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
Gulf Oil Corp by Rand Mc Nally, 1971 edition, o nd the Surface *Wot er Development map of the Texas Water FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Development Board, November 1968. UNITS 1 and 2 TEXAS PORTION OF BRAZOS RIVER BASIN FIGURE 2, 4-5
- P/JSSUJI K!NCOOJI l5Jl!LES UPSTNEAII (fl/ST/NC)
PARKER TARRANT JOHNSON STf PHENVlllf ERATH
/\ /
\
\ //
\ /
\ HAMILTON
\ \
\ \
Q 5 IQ i5 20 '/I
~i,,,,'l.***:,;-.-5**--""",.----~"""'"""'.._""""""""'"' COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PCSSIBlt 'UIURE Lm UNITS 1 and 2 REFERENCE The base fer this map was prepared from pcr!iors
... SELECTED STREAM GAGING STATIONS of US.G,S 1*2501 000 quadro:--~ mops of Abi'.ene 1 Co!los*For1 Worth, SELECTED PRECIPITATION Brownwood ond Woco sect,ons, GAGING STATIONS FIGURE 2,4-6
Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2 .390 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SURFACE l/ATER USER :*iAP Of BRAZOS RI VER FIGURE 2.4-7
400-----------------,---------.-----------.--------r----------,
a z
0
(..)
w
(/)
0::
w a..
1-w z w (!)0 u.
(..) 150 §~ - - - - - - + - - - - - - - -
<( 1-co (!)(f)
- )
tl} 0 0
(.) a)
(\j C1>
(Z) a)
LI..
0 '° 0 0 0 (J) a) '
OJ 00 Cl z
<{
(/)
0 80 1----**-***-
- r:
I- 70 >------
~
w
(!)
0::
<{ 501--------
- c
(.)
(/)
Cl "TI 40 z
- O ro C)
- r: rn C
- 0
>-t)::,
V>Z U) :s:
m -j OOJ:;,, cl>
- Z;:o;z
>-<Z z- rii--1 0 z
r-:i o::, (") C
.f:>, ::0::X,.J:;,, --1 -( I J::>rr ro I
N ~ UJ m 0-0 U') IT1 u, -' z 7J 201...._ _ _ _ _ _ _......_ _ _ _ _ _ _...1..._ _ _ _ _ _ __.__ _ _ _ _ _ __,__ _ _ _ _ _ _........___ _ _ _ _ ___,
)>0
....<-n -<
- or: O.l m
- i ~ 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 mr:i:,
IT1 Cl.
U) ;;,:::
- 0 0 :::0 0 N V5 OJ:;,,
v,z :::0 U) CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IN THOUSANDS OF SQUARE MILES 0 m m 7J 0 U)
- 0
-I
160 PEAK INFLOW = 149,000 cfs 2200'8ROAD CREST 152 EMERGENCY SPILL~~ I I I I J AT. 78=!
140 790 100' UNCONTROLLED OGEE *-*- **----~ [..-+-- 1 PEAK OUTFLOW = 131,150 Cfs ~CREST SERVICE SPILLWA~- ---- !
788 ' AT 775.0 --- : i I
~
I-786 I _L-- __... L---f? __. I 120 I 0 ~ '-.. I I V) u.
u I I I _; _l, l..---" l..---" i
'- COMBINED TOT AL ,DISCHARGE
... I l
I ~
784
/ '/
~/
0 I l Vl I 130 0 100 782 z I z J Q V) INFLOW I-780 5 ..,>
- c j!!;
80 120 792 181 780
_J w 778 l
... 784 783
~
I.>
0::
\
785 Vv --- 1----- .l- ~ L---- 776 u
!!l 0
60 110
-78# 7B6A
,._ 100 774 0 20 40 6G 80 100 120 140
\--OUTFLOW 788~
II~! SPILLWAY DISCHARGE IN THOUSANDS OF CFS t
40 100 90 20 I
I
\\\ \_
90 7BSV' I
I 80 SPILLWAY RA TING 0
' , .... ,_ r---_
--- -- 60 I i
I(; ~
1/)
u.
V
... - 70 AREA IN THOUSANDS OF ACRES
//:
0 0 10 20 30 0 50 60 70 80 6 4 0 2
~g-789.7 A1 36.4 Hr-s.
820 TIME IN HOURS HYDROG RAPHS 70 60 800
-........ L--- ..--
-- i--
'I1;I~lt 789 j!; ~
780 r----....
. r<, ~ i--
C, 60 -~ 50 760
~ --1'---
788
~ CAPACITY-;;>
~7t I l ~ 740
,,V "'I'....
ij I/"ii
- 40 z 720 50 0 V ARE~~ V
~
ii: i==
I -'
4 100 I 786 ei ~ I
(
t;
"'u.
~
40 1 785 784 I
V/'i.J'/
30 w -'
680 660 I
TOP OF CONSERVATION STORAGE: ELEV.
AREA: 3,272 ACRES CAPACITY, 150,953 ACRE-FEET I I I I 1
I I
ns.o
"' \
DRAINAGE AREA, 64 SQUARE MILES DESIGN STORM RAINFALL: 39.1 INCHES 0 30 183 J 20 640 I I I I I 1//;1/2 DESIGN STORM RUNOFF, 34.1 INCHES <II O 20 40 60 80 100 :20 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 V 782 I....
20
-r 781 Ii 1?
/ ~ i - ~ ~780-81 781-82 10 CAPACITY IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET AREA - CAPACITY CURVE
- i:;
,. ~"" 9 ~~ l=:J7JHO
"'" I L7f8 79
...~
~<<
10 778 0
~
L'.=777-78 716-17 775 - SPILLWAY DISCHARGE I I I COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 TIME IN HOURS FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNIT I and 2 MASS CURVE SQUAW CREEK RESERVOIR FLOOD ROUTING AMENDMENT 78 JANUARY 15, 1990 FIGURE 2.4-9 0S158'3027 ,OGN
5,000 I I
- 6. 14 Hrs.
I I 4,680 cfs
- 3. 45 Hrs. I IK I I I
I I \
I 4,370 cfs r, J I \
4,000 I
I "\ / \
3,600 cfs I
I I
I
~
\ ......._ UPPER WATERSHED 3,000 I \
(38. 0 SQ. Ml.)
I I
I I
I I
~
V)
\ a. MAX. 6 HOURS
-z 0
...J LL
'\ '\
2,000 r AREAS ADJOINING\
THE LAKE (20. 3 SQ. Ml.)
\\
2 1,000 T
Ii \ \ '
J \ \ \_
j
~~
I
~
- '\ ~ .............. ....__
0
/ ....__
0 3 6 9 12 15 TIME IN HOURS COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 and 2 SQUAW CREEK WATERSHED UNIT HYDROGRAPHS FIGURE 2.4-10
- ~
- ~
~
790 scR ot E\e-1. ?89 --
~
~
..,.,,.--- _,..,,,,,,- ~
- ~
-Ji-- - 788_ ~
- - I I - - ----
1s1 _ - ~
~
~
~
_,. - - '/
- E 0
'"Cl
--' _ 786 :,.....,---
~
~
_.,,,,. ~ _.
~
~
-- ~
fl)
E 18~-- ...,. .....
~~ / Crest at 769.5
_J w 785 w
_J
_,___i---
s4 J.;;.--,~ --
I,/
/
~
...- - ............... i--..
Lr--,....._
I.._
.........,1 -- ~
3 3
- - - -1s'!>
- - l,...-/ ,,,,,,,
a:
w ~-- .-/1/ l - 40
- -.:- -----~
~
I-
<t - - - - 1si. / -
~ __...---~ /"' [ ..
- ---- s' - ~ ./
1...,..
~~~v
(/)
(/)
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
~V' 780 -----~9 / / FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
_,..,,,,,,- ~ ~ UNITS 1 and 2
- p
- ?~
__. 11 . Safe Shutdown Impoundment
~/ Spillway 5(/ Discharge Characteristics FIGURE 2.4-11 776 0 5 10 15 20 DISCHARGE IN l .000 CFS
1,400 l ,300 l, 200 l, l 00 '\
1,000 \'
900 \
V)
LL 800 \
u z 700 \
3:
0
.....J LL 600 \
500 \ 2 400 \
300
' I\
200 I ~ .........
I ~
100 0
0
~
2 3 4 5
6 TIME IN HOURS COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 and 2 SAFE SHUTDOWN IMPOUNDMENT UNIT HYDROGRAPH FIGURE 2.4-12
95-------.------.-----,-1------.---,-----,---.---,----,...-.
25 YEAR RETURN PERIOD FLOOD POST POSSUM KINGDOM 0
z 0
(.)
w
(/)
0::
w a.. BEFORE COMPLETION OF 1- MORRIS SHEPPARD DAM w
w LL.
u ro u
LL.
0
(/)
0 z
<t
(/)
0
/L
- c AFTER COMPLETION 1- OF MORRIS SHEPPARD
- DAM ,
z 3:
0
...J LL
- le::
<t 251-------+-----1-+-----I---+--------+---+--------,---+----~
w a..
...J
<t Z 15~-----+-~'---l-+----+-------+---+------t--+--~
z
<t 5 L------~----..1....---_.____ ....L..-_...,L__ _ _ ._ _. . _ _ _ " " " "
98 90 70 50 30 20 10 5 2 PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDENCE OF ANNUAL PEAK FLOW ON THE BRAZOS RIVER AT STATION 8-0910 NEAR GLEN ROSE FIGURE 2. 4-13
COSINE RAO !AL LENGT>!
OF PAPJ\LLEL TO ANGLE CENTRAL RAO!Al (STI\TUTE MILES)
(3) (4) (5) (6) 420 . 743 . 756 .562 .42 36° .809 . 795 .643 . 52 30° .866 .814 . 705 .61 240 . 914 l.4C 1.280 1. l 7 130 . 951 1. 32 i. 255 1.19 120 . 978 1.31 l. 282 60 .995 l.27 l.264 QC l.OOG 2. 01 50 . 995 2.01 2. 00 1.99 10 120 . 978 1. 78 !. 74 11 180 . 951 l .63 l. 55 1.47 12 24° . 914 1.51 : . 38 1. 26 13 3c;o .866 1.46 1. 26 1.09 l4 36° .809 .3C l. 18 , 96 420
- 743 .80 1J.::: 0.0
- 13. 512 16 .94 EFFECTIVE Ft1Cfl ( Fel " L 25 ~ILES LOCATIOH: SGUA'a OW 420 360 300 240
. 743
.8G9
. 866
.914 1.33
.61
. 99
.65
. 70
. 56
- 74
- 53
.61
. 51
\0
..?so,
, __ jI t
f'-.__/~J 18° .951
- 57 . 54 . 51 120 . 978 . 59 . 58 . 57 50 oo
.995 1.000 4.43
. 57 4.43
. 56 4.43 "Oo~1/2 60 .995 I. 74 !.73 l. 72 10 120 .978 1.55 L, 11 J80 . 951 l. 36 1.29 l. 73 12 240 . 314 1.28 1. JI 13 300 . 866 1.82 1. 58 l. 36 14 36° .809 I. 59 I. 29 L04 15 42° . 743 I. 34 1.00 . 74
- 13. 512 17. 24 EFFECTIVE FETCH (Fe) 1. 28 HlLES REFERE~CE:
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 1/Z \ MILE UNITS 1 and 2
..,,._,...,__,,,._.,,,_"""'_,o...,,...,,!!!!!!!!!...,,...,,.,.,,,,.1 KlLOMTE~
FETCH DIAGRAM PLANT S!TE AND SQUAW CREEK DA"i FIGURE 2, 4-14
NSTREAM OF DAM (3) (4) {5)
ANGLE CCS1t-<'E U:NGTU RAtU\.L LENG'l'H :.tx;LE COSINE Ll'.f'iG'l'H RADil\L LENGTH FR0:-0: o,* er PARlJ,:.Xt., 'l'O FHOM. Of' ~;' l?Afu\Ll,I.;L TO CENTAA.L ANGLE AA.DIAL CU.J'!'RAL RADIAL CENTR/-.1. ANG::.£ FM!AL CENTRAL RADIAL
!SA:)!J\.L (FT) AADlAL (FT)
- 743 371 276
- 743 1200 892 663 n .8C9 551 446 .809 1200 971 795 3 .866 563 563 JCO .866 uoo 1126 975 4 .914 750 685 686 .9~4 1280 1170 s 180 .951 950 903 859 . 951 1450 1379 lJll 6 120 .97S 1000 978 956 6 ,978 47()0 4600 4499 7 60 .995' 1900 lB90 1080 7 .995 41SO 4129 4108 8 oo 1.000 1750 1750 B 1.CDO 3()00 3900 3'?00 9 60 .995 1691 1Gfl2 9 ,995 ,(,,22') 4208 10 120 ,978 l6CQ 1565 1530 10 2543 2487 11 180 .951 JOOQ 951 904 11 ,951 600 543 12 240 .914 650 594 543 12 .914 ;,vo 418
)QC ~866 500 375 13 .866 400 346 300 36° .809 400 324 262 14 .000 400 :tf.,2 420
- 743 350 260 193 15 193
'roTAL 13.$12 TOTAL lL905 'JX/l'AL ::..3.512 T'C"tl'AL 25fi2.!
TO BE CLOSED ABANDONED IN PLACE J
<.!)
- z:.
-v,
--' 0 1-Z 1-0
,, 230,000 we..
V)
~~~-;- ~ ' s-~-._
j B
\
ti 227 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FETCH DIAGRAM SAFE SHUTDOWN IMPOUNDMENT DAM 0
FIGURE 2.4-15
/ !I/' l!f '
Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 I
I COMANCHE PEAK SES FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT U NITS 1 and 2 LAYOUT OF S.C.R. DAM
Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2 .390 r---
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 S. C.R. DAM EMBANKMENT SECTION AND DETAILS Fl(,URE 2. 4 -17
Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2 .390 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
Fl'IAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SPILLWAY PLAN AND PROFILE FIOJIE 2. 4
- 18
Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2 .390 COMANCHE PE AK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SPLLWAY DISCHARGE CHANNEL GRADING I FIGl,flE 2 . 4 -19
Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2.390
_ ! COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SPILLWAY UNO(RORAIN SYSTEM FIQJRE 2. 4
- 20
Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 COMANCHE PE AK S E. S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UN ITS 1 and 2 SAFE SHUTDOWN IMPOUNDMENT DAM CROSS SECT FIGURE 2 . 4
- 21
Surface 90 80 70
- 1.,...*
60
.J
- I '>**- - **~**
C 60-~
C uJ I-W-~-1.-.I. "-' .;.___.__e-,._._._.c., --'-**-"---'- h-----.-++ *-+ HS4-h+ +-**-++*-+ H-~+ * +'~-,-+ * -*-+-+ W-,.+.....++-!-~-'+,.-,-1-+~,,+l-,a-++++-+-++-+-+-*++-l ---4-++,. ,_,_. i--.4-+~-+-h-+ + ,.._,~...,- ._ _ _,_ ______,_,_-+++~,-i L,
COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 1
!1 lJ '.
iii UNITS 1 and 2
- 1) ,.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __._
' AMENDMENT 10 Area and Capacity Characteristics of the
- " MARCH 31. 1980 Safe Shutdown lmpoundment lnHially and --++**H--,
- , After 40 Years of Service 100 200 400 Storaoe
Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 C FR 2.390 COMANCHE PEAK SE S FINAL SAFETY AI\IALYSIS REPORT UN ITS 1 anti 2 LAYOUT Of S.S.I. DAM A ND RELATED FACILITIES r C'-WE 2. 4
- 23
100,000---------------------------------
I0,000 1----+-----+----i-..-------------'-----..---+---+------'----+-----+----+-------1/4 AVERAGE DISCHARGE a
z OF 1,555 CFS
_J--f------4------+- ~
0 u
w CJ) 1,000 .__--+----4 4-- ~ - - - I - - - - -
tl'.'.
I w
n.
1-1..Ll w
LL u
CD I 00 ~---+---+---+---+----1-----------1---+----1k----+---+-----+---1
- J u
z
~
0
_J LL 1----'-_.......__.......__ _....__ _...____._--1r,_ ____.,________...._______
0.01 .I .5 2 10 30 50 70 90 98 99.5 99.9 99.99 PERCENT OF TIME INDICATED DISCHARGE WAS EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Flow Probability Curve For The Brazos River At Station 8-0910 Near Glen Rose FIGURE 2. 4-24
20,000---------------------.....---..----...-----...--
I0,000 1----+-1,---------l---------+----~---+---+---+---+-- ---+---+------1--------1 1,000 1 - - - - - - - - + - l l - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - - - - i - - - - - - - - ! - - - - + - - ~
a z
0 u
w en 0:::
w I00 1-------+---+---+-------"'------+----+------+---+---- - - - - - - - - + - - - - - , 1 - - - - - - 4 a..
~AVERAGE DISCHARGE 1-- 70.8 CFS w
w I.I...
u co u
z
- =
0
..J lL O.l'----.....1...--1--.....1...--...._---i....--i....-...i....--.,___-__.L.-_"-_..i.....----1 0.01 .I .5 2 10 30 50 70 90 98 99.5 99.9 99.99 PERCENT OF TIME INDICATED DISCHARGE WAS EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Flow Probability Curve For The Paluxy River At Station 8-0915 Near Glen Rose FIGURE 2. 4-25
A B C D E F G H
\
JJ~ i
..,r:v. :1:.,;:;*,
J_ 2 3
I 4 .
~YA"'CPJ.. i,*;=-
05';.E'::
AMEIIDIIEl!T 87 DECE!IBER 18, 1992 6 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFE TY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 AND 2 ________,
8 C D t G L PLANT WATER SYSYTEM GENERAL: TWO UNI TS FIGURE 2.4-26 H
A B C
. --' D G 7
- o*-> ~. c ~~~j
- =;:,~
r 2
\
\
5 5
~87 CEll8ER l8. 1992 6 COMANCH FINAL SAFET yE ANA PEAK S.E *S
- UNITS 1 A~YDS1S REPO~T
. 2 UNlfl~NT WATER SYSTEM UN IT 2 *I'. NORMAL OPERATION
- ORMAL 0 ?ERA Ti ON
_i 'IGURE 2,4*27 A B C D G H
A B C D
- £ F H 19.682 1,000.000 EVAPORATIVE
1 LOSSES ANO SEEPAGE MAiN CONDENSERS NOTES
- l. FLOWS lN GPM.
32,607 2. 9ZO GPM OURINC EMERGENCY TANK FILL MAKE-UP fROM LA~E GRANBURY 1,100.000 28,000 FROi..
SQUAW CREH A£SEA'IOIR ,....----1------------------------.------------4! f~d:iu** RESERVOIR 2
2 16,000 TURB PLANT SHUTDOWN 1 - - - -......-. COOLING WATER ' - - - - - ' IMPOUNDMENT HEAT EXCHANGER; OVf:RfLOW CANAL 260 ,-------------! AUXILIARY F£EOWATER PUMPS :s 12,882 SHUTDOWN IMPOUNDM£NT 0 (NOTE 2J MAKE. UP FIR£ 1 - - - - - - - - - 1 Pf<<)TE.CflON SYSTEM NON-RAO!OACT)VE PLANT l----,
4 FROM SAfE UQUlO WASTE SHUTDOWN EVAP0RATIV(
!MPOUNOMENT LOSSES 68,000 SANITARY WASTE TR£ATME,NT SERVICE ::M!!RGENCY JJUER O!ESEL GEN PUWPS r'.EAT EXCH TO SQUAW CREEK RESERVOIR 12.5 MAli:E-UP 11 W4TER RECDVER8l Oil TR(AHAE.NT IOFFSlT(
WASTE O!SPOSAU 5
5 PLANT MAK( -U? OEM<NERAU ZED TO PLANT WATER WATER '-----< USE AS TREATMENT SYS STORAGE TANK NEEDED FROM ONSITE WATER WE'...LS MIEmEJITtfl 111Er:a11D 18, 1992 Fl~E GENERATED FOR FSAR ONLY 6
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. 6 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 AND 2 PLANT WATER SYSTEM UNIT 1- NORMAL OPERATIONS UNIT 2 - SHUTDOWN AT 4 HOURS IflG002428,DCN A B C D t E G H
A B D G NOTES MAL'J 1JLOW'.:, IN Gf-'M.
CONOf:_NSt.RS
- 2. 920 GPM DUR I NG EMERGENCY TANK FI LL.
~ PC 1,. t,
- 1r11 WATER PLMPS ,--------+-----
2 2 CANAi 3 3 N-0N-RA010A', T1V~, 4 Pi..4.'H ,----,
L (lUIG 11,'A':. ll 1
FROl,I SAFE
';HI JT C, ~,'l'I~<
M;::ryJ*,nwc=_**J'
- JANI TART ill'AS l!
- . WA it.R
'lo'.STE I.IANJ.GEMENT TR~~Tl.lP*iT SlSTEIJ
~Al::E-UP WA TfP rnur1.1lNT WASTE 5 5 H.'.11-.:T ~Hf-11P (' C,EMl~JERAL 1z:::o', r~, PLM'T
'ffAll:J--1 WATER , - - - - - , \ JSE AS,,
TREATI.IENT SYS i ':-TORAGE TM~ j~N_E_Ec_rn _ _~* /'
1 I FROM \
ON'.:>' 1 t:
WA TEP Wlll ':,
I Al4£NDMEIIT III DECEMBER 18, 1992 f- 'GURl:. GlNl:.RA rc_D FOR FSAP ONLY 6 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. 6 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS I AND 2 PLANT WATER SYSTEM UNIT I - SHUTDOWN AT 4 HOURS UNIT 2 - LOCA AT RECIRC FIGURE 2.4-29 I , :cuU242J.DVN A B D G
N 0 20 MILES LEGEND
~ OUTCROP OF PALUXY AQUIFER COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
@ AREA WHERE AQUIFER IS CONFINED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 OUTCROP OF PALUXY FORMAT I ON REFERENCE The bose mop for this iltustro11on was prepared from portions of U.S.G S. quadrangle mops. for Abilene, Brownwood, Dallas and Waco.
FIGURE
0 ro 20 MIL£S
~ii""'!5iiiii!!!!5iiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~ ~~
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 OUTCROP OF GLErl ROSE FORMATION REFERENCE, The base map for this il!ustraf1on was prepared from portions of U,S G.S quadrangle mop5 for Abilene, Brownwood, Dallas and Waco.
FIGURE 2, 4-31
~ 5 O !!'."'iii~5iiiiii"""§iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!!I 0~!"!!"'!"!!"'!"!!"'~~!"!!"'~~20 MIL ES LEGEND
___,-roe-- ELEVATION CONTOUR COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
~ AQUIFER OUTCROP FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELEVATION TOP OF rnrn MOUNTAINS FORViATI ON REFERENCE The bose rr,ap tor th<s 1i!ustraflon wos pr,epa,ed from portions ot U.S.G.S. quodror,gle maps for Abilene, Brownwood, Dallas orid Waco. FIGURE 2, 4-32
0 10 20 MILES Wtll llffORMAiJO~ PRESL~TED IN ~il!"'5iiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~~~
TA8L£ 2.2-13
~ COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
-@- PUBLIC SUPPLY WELL FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ij INDUSTRIAL WELL UNITS 1 and 2
© IRRIGATION WELL PUBLIC SUPPLY, INDUSTEIAL
.~@ IRR! GATI ON WELLS R£FRE.NCE' The base mop for this il!u-stroHon was pre:po,e:d from portions of U,$,G,$, quadrangte maps for Abilene, 0 TO 2:J MILES Brownwood, Dellos and Waco.
FIGURE 2, 4- 33
0 10 20 MILES LEGEND COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
- 6 0 0 Pl EZOMETRIC SURFACE
,,.,- ELEVATION CONTOUR FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PlEZO:URJ C StJ'.<.FACE, TWIN MOUFAWS FORMATION, REFERENCE n,* bo .. mop !or tni* ,11u,1rohon wos propored from S!TE REG I Oil portions of U.S,G.S. quodrang!e maps for Abilene, Brownwood, Dallas ond Woco.
FIGURE 2,4-34
I 04~~
\
47/i
\
\
140 17A
~
15A 040 21A 0 II 10 0
330
</SITE 7
0.28 0.27 KEY 0 2MI.
0 DOMESTIC WELL A STOCK WELL 250 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 REFERENCE THE BASE FOR THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING U.S.G.S.
QUADRANGLE MAPS*
WATER WELLS, HILL CITY, 1961 S!TE VI CltHTY NEMO, 1961 FIGURE 2. 4-35
@SITE 0 2Mi, COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PIEZO!'.ETRIC SURFACE, REFERENCE THE BASE FOR THIS MAP WAS PREPARED TWIN MOUNTAINS AQUIFER, FROM THE HILL CITY, 1961, U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE SITE VICINITY FIGURE 2, 4-36
j N
-:::",-:-._ \(,...........,_ . .
I *
/2.p 08-3 0
\
z r:>
(/)
z
- :i:::
.J:;
- PW (CPSES Production wells)
- OB (CPSES Observation wells)
- S0-402 (TWDB Observation wells)
._ Plant Site 0 SCALE IN MILES 5 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOCATION OF PRODUCTION AND OBSERVATION WELLS FIGURE 2. 4-37
10 9
8 ---
7 ---
6 5 ---
4 ---
3 2 ---
0 0
0 0
Q ____
9 --
8_
7_
6 -- ~
u..
_J 5 _
_J w
Cl LO Cl.. I 3 4 __ ~ 0 Cl
...... ::E: ---~---~
w 0 Cl..
0 X ~
Cl..
- E: 0
- , 0 0 3 -- N 0 Cl.. ...... L() ......
- E:
0 a::
u..
2 __
\ I- V) 0-I-
w w
u..
0 0
o_
0 9 -
8 -
7 6_
5_
4_
3 2 -
0 0
0 N
(133.:l) NMOOM\fHO COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DISTANCE-DRAWDOWN CURVES TRINITY SAND (TWIN MT,)
FIGURE 2. 4- 38
~
f!lt!Jllllli I 4Q ,..__.__...........__.._ 0BS ERV ATIO N WELL NO
- 1 +--1-+-+--+--1f----+---+--+-+-+---+--+-+-1--+--+--+--11----+-+-+-+-+-+---i ~--+-+---+-4--+--+---,f-+-+--1--+--+----1--1--1--+-+--+-+---1-+---1---1--i-----..----1---1------' 4 Q g EL. 660 FT.
I [ i-,,...,-....i-,,...,...._..._. i.--- ..... - - ~I""-, ...... ~ -.
u.
o l-LL.
l---++~H---+++----1-+-+tiH++-l-----+-+++-+'-+-~~-~µ++-t--+++-H---+~+~-+--+-kt-+++-l-i+++----1+++-l--+++-t---++++-+--+----t--4---i--l--,-I I -~
3 u.1-
- c ............ I O ,::_
l- ,....... ::c a..
LJ..l 50 1----1--+-+-+---+---+-+----l--f--+-+---il-+-I-+-+-+-+--+-+-l---+--l--t-1---1--+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+--f-+-+--+---,f--+--+-+--l-+--t-+-,i--"1"-i- ...-+--f-+-+--+--,f-+-+--l--+--+--+-+--1---1---+--+--i---l--+-+--1 50 ~
C)
LJ..l 0:::
t I
- - +-----','--+--+- -
- i-19 0 1--1---+--+--+--+--+--+-+-----+- OBSERVATION WELL NO
- 2 +*-+-.,-~-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+--+-+--+-+-+------+--+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+__.__+-+-+--+---+---.i-+--+,-+-++--+-+--+-+-++--+--1 19 0
--1 ~,- n-- o LJ..l
. .J...... ,...............
0:::
1-
<C EL. 831 FT. , ~i.,, ..... , j i I, I: Lu 1-3 ---- t--+--t-+----l-+--+--+-+--+-+--+-+----11f---+--+---+-t-+~~~~-+-~-+---t-1-+~'-+-i~r-.....-+......_-+-~~'.-..I:-:.~~~ ,~,~
- I 1 <C LI.. iu.
--.: ! ~ : ....- ,* -....... I I 3..---.
I I i--.:
~~~
0 LL.
I I 0 u..
200 l---+-+-+--+-+---+---l--+-+-+--+-+--+-+-+-ll-+---+--+--+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+--+--+-+--f---+-+-+--+-+--+-----1--11--+-+-+--+-+-+l~..... +-"'+-L+-+--+-+-!--+--!--+-+--'---+-l-+-+--.-1~--+--+-+---+-+-+~ 200
- c I l-a.. :c .........
Lu l-a..
11ri-t-t-t-r--~-+-+--U-.L...L i Cl LJ..l
- I , Cl I ]--+-+-+-
1 1 I ! I I I l 210 l---+--+-+-+-+-1-1---11-+---+-+--+-I-+-+-+;-+-ll-+---+--+---4-----+---+-+--+-+-+----+--+--+-+--'-1-+-+--+-+--+-+----+-f-+--+-+---+--+-+-+-+-+-+--+------+---l--+-~+-+--+--l-+--~i-+---+-+~210
-f-i . n-,ttt+/--1-H-31 1
OBSERVAT ION WELL NO.
H - 1 ,~ ' -
t ... ,-
~I,_i-,,...._..__~ ..... *-*- ___t-1----t-11~1H-+-"'-l--.C.
j *
-*11 --** . - -7I ---' ' - "1 0- t-i-0:::
- c I.LI ...........
n--- , , .
L- ---
EL. 890 FT. -
nTrn:Trrn,rrn,~n,rrnTrrnTr:
Cl u.. -
220 rrn:!: n--r:+-T, r-r-n~ff+:f'=F+:+~:t:P::J:tct:=---m 1 1 1 0
220 1
, ~
I ; I I. I I I I 90 J-..-l---1--4--+-~-+--+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+--+--l-+---+--1----1-+--+--1--+--1-_._+---+-+-+-+-+-f--l---+-.......+---+--+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+--+----+--+-+-___,--+-+--l-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-1--1 I 90
! i I I 1 1 1 1
1
--l--+--l--+-+--1-+--+-+--+-+--t--+--+--+--lf-+l-+-+--l--+-+-~+---1-,.--+--+-+--t--+-~
ii 11,,~~I '
~~-+-.-+--<f-+--1--+-'---+---+--+-+--t---+--+-+-l-+--+-~l-+-~+--+-+--+-+-,jc--+--l-+-+--l--l 1
i r,,....i'-.,._ I I 1
i OBSERVATION W:EL L NO. 4 ;~ j i 200 l--+--+---+---1---------+--+--+--+--+--+----+----+--+---........i---+--+-- EL. 84 8 FT. 200 11
+-+---l-+--+--+--+--+---+--+--+'l,\....+----,---+-4-+-+-+-1--"--+--+--+---+-+----+---+--+-+---+--<--+---,-+----+--+----l 1--1----+-~+-+'-+-+-+--+-+--+-I'._ ,! __ +_ f----+~-+----+- L~-1---+-:. . . . . 1 ----1-- . '*--+---+--*-""*-1k\""l"<<*-f----*t---*l*** I ... ' I I 1
2I O l--i--+--l--+--l---+----1---+---4-- -+--+--+l-+--+----!--+-.,..._.__+---t---1------+--+--+---i----+--+--+-+-+-+-+---l----f--+--i--,'--+-'l-----+--+--+--+-+*..:>"1--\-+-+'-+-+--+-+~1--+--+--+-+---+--+-+--+--+--+--+--+---+-+-+--1 2I0 1
- i I I i I I \.
I / I ' 1I I '11 i !
l I Ii I'
_iL__ I ! I I I 220 LLJ_J__J_.J_J__LJ___LJ_J__j____.__j_j__J_J--!-_l__l~_J__LJ.__J_.J_J_LJ__LJ_J_JLL__J__L_J_J~L.J__LJ_LL_L-!-J~~~~~~~_..,_..,J..~-L._j___L_L_I I i i 220 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER 1975 COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 HYDROGRAPH OF OBSERVATION WELLS FIGURE 2. 4-39
Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2 .390 6
COMANCHE PEAK S E.S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PLOT PLAN DRAINAGE DITCHES LAYOUT FIC'.o(.JfiE 2 ,4 - 4 0 A 8 C I., i i E F G
Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 6
COMANCHE PEAK S.E S.
FNAL SAFETY AN.AlYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PLOT PL AN DRAINAGE DITCHES L AYOUT flQ,Jl( 2-~- 4 1 B C D f
- - -- --~-
,I.ju. (p'-o' *4*
(,~ t ,: f~N~i:;"f' .~(_(-, *, ,,,- f~p t ----*~;'t~---*- ~-~-~~--~l~-~~ ..I..,... ~--*!:
....-...,..,,~--i t
,~
t~b" \\/(X)fl ~K;~~L_j
_tA.d~ PF' c~~lr WALL _ _ ___.
1011 w... 100
" <~A~),.....,_,~
IA:1A.L OF FLA'!IH!h4 PLAN
......--------~JW":-"'7'---
0P'Si"'-l l Ne; SECTION i
1 T.?P 0F CG-i"'tC,
~ L.A e,.,
( \.. .)
-t>l!ttJIZ.E "1TTER "It? ~G.,,_,..C JULY 31, 1979 B.LOC.Kt t--l <:, A.S.
eel'Qo.
COMANCH~ PEAK S.E.S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ELEVATION UNITS 1 and 2 ROOF DRAINS DETAIL OF RELIEF AND DRAINAGE OPENING FIGURE 2. 4-42
0
-f_;~ o<'
--~
eslon Eagle Poss SCALE IN MILES 0 50 100 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2
REFERENCE:
RAISZ, ERWIN, 1957, 11 LANDFORMS OF THE UNITED STATES PHYSIOGRAPHY FIGURE 2.5.1-1
Approximate
/J)
Ero Sy5tem Serie* Group Strntigrophic Units Thickness Character of Rocks 0 1/) (Feet)
C
- 0
()
0 g
Ouoternory - - - 0-100 Silt, 1ome 1and ond grovel l'l Cenozoic Tertiary - - Not PreHnl in Sile Region -
-l l>
Cl-0 1/)
- Navarro 0-550 t 0-1100+/-
Shale, marl and sand
.. Mori and limy shale
)(
"O Taylor 0 0 C.
- Austin 0-600 +/- Chalky limestone
- E 0 Gulf D
- , Eagle Ford 0-300 .+/- Shale
~ 0 (Upper 0
3 Cretoceoui Woodbine 0-200'+/-
Ferruginous sand, sandstone, shale, sandy shale, clay and some lignite and gypsum 0
Buda Formation 0-50 +/- Limestone 3 Del Rio Formation 0-100+/- Shale
~ Washita 0
to Georgetown formation 0-150:t Limestone 0
_o..
-0 Kiomichi 0-50 +/-
Hord, fossiliferous limestone (often honey-Edwards Formation 0-175+/- combed), reel material, sh ale, chert and
"' Fredericks-burg dolomite Cretaceous Comanche Peak Formation 0-150+/- Limestone and limy shale Mesozoic Walnut Formation 0*200 +/- Shale and calcareous clay t-,ne to medium grained sand, shale, Paluxy Formation 0-200.:!: .,, sandy and calcareous shale, some C pyrite and iron nodules
< * ~ l e n Rose Formation 0-1500+/- ..
0 Limestone, shale and anhydrite Comanche
~
0
- Conglomerate, fine to coarse
~
(Lower grained sand, sandstone, si It-0-175+/-
..0 stone, shale, sandy shale, clay, K"
Creto ceous) Hensel member C
0 Cow Creek +I 0 C
limy cloy and limestone 0 member 0-130:!: u 2 Shale inter- Limestone E Pears al I "'0 -
00
!; .," bedded
'T1 Trinity C 0 ...
0 member Hammett member -+i 4l 0 0-140+/- c;: -
E with sand Shale
- o 0 -.,
f1'1 z)> E C
N 0
a) ~
C
,, G)
..... r
(")
0 0
lL i:":,
~ Sligo member N
0 0 0-1 30:t C
0
..! Limestone ci 0 z .; :;f 0
.,,~ -;
0 C (/) ~ ..
- 0 m
- t::-
r )> )> -r,)::,,
ro 3 C
- '~= "C C
£ Sand a,,d Conglomerate, C
(./')
z
'Tl m z rr ro
<( I- Sycamore 41 0 0 0, 4.n t
0 conglomer* fine to coorse-
-i - -I (") member 0 ate with sand ond sand-N Ul
~
-i
(/)
-< Im
)>
C ll> 3 0..
ro 0..
0 Hosston member V) 0-0 1550+/- o-
~ _§ o-u 0
~
E 0)
C 0
calcareous cement, shale and stone, siltstone, shale, sandy and calcareous. shale,
.....I G) ---4 z -u u, c+ *:;:" 0
~-" "0 ,i u
limestone cloy and limestone
)> ~
~ OJ m ~
en I- "
C I> C N
~ ....... 0
- i LL ';
)> ...... </)
- I: Q_ (/) :;;i;:
(/)
\.0 co Cotton ? ?
n N co Jurassic Valley Sands, conglomerate and shale
(/)
n :0 0 m m Pennsylvanian Mineral Wells Formation 0-601: Shale wiH limestone seams and layers r -u Shale, limestone, dolomite, sandstone, C 0 (/) Paleozoic Most of Paleoro,c rocks undlfferentla led, Including Ouachita Facies ? evoporites., and metamorphics 3: :0
- z -;
\ ARKANSAS ANDARKO ~/~~ASIN BASIN
- HARDE MAL.
BASIN r
0 I
INE S:
CJ)
~ UPLIFT
\ !
~
Ll.
..J w 1, '**
- I:
1411 (I) z cc w
....u,
<(
w UPLIFT
~~
ct
,_"f-~'o
~~*KERR BASIN
~~
\~--1/
0
- - -AMENDMENT 7 l00 IIO JULY 31, 1979
- ALSO KNOWN AS "STRMN BASIN" COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
SOURCES:T*ctonic Mop of Tu,n, G*ologicol Highway Jhp FI\IAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT of Tuos, Dollu G*olo9icol Socl*ty, 1963.
Tectonic Mop of th* Mid-Co.,tifl*nt R*gioi,, UNITS 1 and 2 GHlogico! Highway Mop of th. Mld-Contli,ent Region, A.A.,:>,G., 1966 Modified with data REGIONAL TECTONIC STRUCTURE from Turner (Ref. 129)
LEGEND Scaie in Kiles QU~TERNARY Qt Recent 50 100 Qp ~ Pleistocene TERHAR¥ Tp - Pliocene undiv.
Tm-To Miocene-01igocene undiv.
T:; - Eocene, Jackso.n Tel - Eocene, C1aiborne T;m,,, - Eocene, 1'1'1dway-Wilcox MESOZOIC AME1~DMENT 2 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
Ku K:
tipper Cretaceous lower Cretaceous. JULY 27, 1978 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PALEOZOIC P Pet'11ian UNITS 1 and 2 Pennsylvanian
~ Missippian-Cambrian PR£-CAM8~!AN p - Igneous and me-tamorphics REGIONAL GEOLOGY FIGURE 2.5.1-4
- 3000 YOUNG I
I STCPHENS Ni P1NTO
\
I MC LENNAN Seal liflMt-.1 L 1-ae ae JO
=1 BELL LLMO WILLIAMS()tj
\
AMENDMENT 7 JULY 31, 1979 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT REFER TO FIGURE 2.5.1-23 FOR DETAILED UNITS 1 and 2 ELLENBURGER IN THE SITE VICINITY.
ELLENBURGER STRUCTURE MODIFIED AFTER: TURNER (REF.129)
FIGURE 2.5.1-4a
A A' LOVING WINKLE_R ( C TOR COr-_f RUNNfl 12,000 10,000 8,000
'\,l'," 1 B :,
6,000 I-l&J w 4,000 IL
~
I.I.I
...J LOCATION OF CROSS*SECTION cl SEA 0
"'...J cl
....Q:~
l&J 4,00
_, All ~
I A' I
I CALLAHAN I cASTLANO w
I u
2 (RATH 0
0 0
I w
IX w
IJ 1g l JOHNSON El L 15- KAUFMA?-. Vl:,,N ZANDT $Mi TH woou
- z Ir z
0 a
0
"'oc- I 7
0
(!C CJ 1~
V)
- ~ SANDSTONE
[Hlttl SALT 0
u r ;:.
0 II l
<c
<t re
<l I
<t '- ~
1':;
- - SHALE METAMORPHOSED ROCKS 12,000
~¢;]* DOLOMITE 10,000 f 0 8,000 U~~~~~zj LIMESTONE ~ NORMAL FAULT SITE 6,000 I-
~
u.l l&J IL ANHYDRITE THRUST FAULT 4,000
(, ..t;,.
2,000 u.l
...J io o 4() ~Q cl SEA 0 r-::-:::-i ;;:j (I)
LEVEL ...J PAT :ON ?OX cl 2,000 u I-Q:
4,000 u.l 6,000 AMENDMENT 7 JULY 31, 1979 e,ooo 10,000 COMANCHE PEAK E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 MODIFIED AFTER: Geo1ogica1 Highway Map of Texas, The American Association of REFER TO FIGURES 2.5.2-30 AND 2.5.1-31 REGIONAL EAST-WEST Petroleum Geologists, 1973, FOR CROSS SECTIONS IN SITE VICINITY. GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION FIGURE 2.5.1-5
MONTAGUE IWISE\ JACK I PALO PINTO I ERATH !HAMILT()NI MILLS ILAMPAi BURNET BLANCO s
N PROJECTED SAS MUENSTER *FORT IIORTH TUSI SITE LAMPASAS LLANO OUACHITA BA..CJIN ARCH UPLIFT FRONT ARCH 0
t.a e -2000 -2000 ?i1-1 z
1-1 ~
~
-4000 -4000 tn
-6000 -6000 E
~
H
- z:
H >wJ
! -8000 -8000 g
-10,000 -10,000 SCALE IN MILES VERTICAL BXAGGZRATIClf 40X
.->aTH-IOUTB GEOI.001C SECTION M0IITMlm QAlll'ff-PI IJICO COUifl i I TEXAS "TI MUBNS'rD AIICll TBN)(JG11 LLUIO UPLIFT z
)> ('") *ALSO DIOIIII AS STRAIIN BASDI Tl c5 ~ ::0 ro C...
C om CJ) ~ C:3;:
- 0 r- rrn m
s-
-~
Ci)
C z
)> )>
"TI m nz
-<Z W:3:
CJ INIJEX STRUCTURAL MAP DATUM: TOP ELLENBURGER N
u, n~
n
-i CJ)
~I
)> m
~
~
~
JTI z
-j CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1000 FT.
MKlDIPil:D FIOt TURNER (M:F .129) i3
.....I V, ~ ..... z "'O
\.0 --..J
--..J
~~
- 0 V, --i Q) \.0 0\ :x :J MODIFIED FROM FIGS 8 AND 14, V, I Q..
fT1 V, no N
~ r- TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD, APPIWJXIMATE REPORT 157, VOL.l, 1972 SCALE
- ! =i
- x
- 0 V>
mm 0
- z a
- 0 CJ)
DPD TO PIOODS 2.5.l-4a AND 2.5.1-23 TBIIJ 2.S.l-31 POa MORE 0 SONI.
-i DBTAILJ!D STltOCTUU MPS
DENSITY FORMATION LITHOLOGY 2,2 2.4 2.6 2.8
,_; 0 ~O..!.;"' shale, green, sticky, orogonite concretions a: w MIDWAY FM . *=*.:-;. shale, buff-colored, papery wit~ sandy lamination w
...J
< *-'=
0 - and concretions shale sand on d louconi!ic a.
shale, gray, sticky sandstone and sondy shale NAVARRO GROUP sticky with sond lentils TAYLOR GROUP chalk, white, hard
- u. shale, $andy
..J
- , shale, dork marly, fossiliferous ray, calcareous, fossl liferous AUSTIN GROUP ite; marl with glouconite d chalk one EAGLE FORD GROUP s shale
"'::, stone an sandstone strea s ot bose 0
w green, bentonitie; shale, red u WOODBINE GROUP brown & white, shaly partings w shale, gray-black, calcareous with limestone Q:
u W.\SHITA GROUP stringers, oolitic, dense FREDERICKSBURG G. shale, black, calcareous; limestone, fossi !iferovs sandstone, with re bed$ & minor s a e PALUXY FM. t e c lcareous w sandstone
- c sondstone & si Its tone with shaly p<>rtings u sandstone, calcareou* and sihy z
< GLEN ROSE FM. sond,tone with anhydrite and limestone stringers
- I: anhydrite, mottled, pure, mas$ive 0
u limestone, oolitic, sandy, shaly
$andstone, colcareous, shaly aly, oss, i erous groy; sholy sandstone TRAVIS PEAK FM.
(TWIN MTSJ basal conglomerate with chert pebbles shale, red, green & gray, waxy COTTON VALLEY FM mudstone, varicolored u shale with dense limestone stringers & minor vi V') anhydrite
°'-,
BUCKNER FM.
shale, maroon, red with anhydrite, salt & silty sandstone strln ers I imeston& brown is gray, cry sta i ne, 1
SMACKOVER LS. fossiliferous, dolomite stringers NORPHLET-LOUANN" redbeds, evaporites, conglomerates EAGLE MILLS FM.? shaie and redbeds, arenaceous shole 1 limestone, dolomite, sandstone, evopori!es, OUCHITA FACIES and metomorph ic rocks Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 SOURCE: Crosby, 1971 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ROCK DENSITY VARIATION WITH DEPTH FIGURE 2.5.1-7
M A I. C u I .\1 E X 0 F IJ SCALE
'" r.J:LES COMANCHE PEAK S.ES.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 REGIONAL BOUGUER GRAVITY MAP FIGURE 2.5.1-8
~
0 I\
~
0 0
0 I
fi' 0
,fl ,
,/
\
\
I
{ INDEX MAP DENTON COUNTY, 1
co. ':
,, \o)'
,, 5'> EXPLANATION
\ Q I~
\
\ \ 400. 600 Aerorodioocti vi ty belt
\ \
' 450- Narrow band of high or low oeroradioocti vi ty.
600 Solid where well defined; dashed where not well defined. Boundaries not drawn through areas of poody defined levels.
Numbers indicate general range of aero*
radioactivity levels in counts per second.
/
/
.I' I
\
I I
I I I 0
~
I I I I ~
')
I ci I
0 0
'l;f, 0
IQ It) l ' %J ,
SOURCE: From Geophysical Investigations 0 \ hj Mop GP-696, by U.S.G.S. in cooperation 0 l'Q
- ? ' ' 'I
'I with Division of Biology and Medicine, U.S.
Atomic Energy Commission, 1970
\
\
\ I \ i' I I
I
/
,' g I
1")
o,
- g \
, \
\
\
-- .,,, I "J
, I' J
0
%1 I
I
/
/
I I
I
- ERATH ',COUNTY ILL CO. ELLIS I COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
0 10 15 20 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 REGIONAL NATURAL GAMMA AERORADIOACTIVITY FIGURE 2. 5.1-9
LEGEND ALLUVIUM QUATERNARY TERRACE EDWARDS LIMESTONE COMANCHE PEAK LIMESTONE LOWER CRETACEOUS WALNUT FORMATION PALUXY SAND Kgr GLEN ROSE LIMESTONE OE SOTO OIL CO.
S.W. WANN NO. I f5tl~ 9 ofPTH 50112 co**
DRY a ABANOONEO 8119/5Z I
Kgr "
CO**
r:;;~~! 0
! ~im O 2 :3 Ml.
~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Siiaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii;;;;;;;;;;;l,!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I 4
- i Kpx .
AMENDMENT 2 JULY 27, 1978 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PLYMOUTH (M.E. DAVIS)
T.H. COUSINS NOi f5t:L 0 if..PTH 6&!0 co**
DRY II ABANDCJIED 11/23.'4! VICINITY GEOLOGIC MAP FIGURE 2.5.1-10
LOC.Al GEOLOGIC:
COLUNI TYl"I CAL ! .. n,1cAL THICKNESS IN FEET I.. ; =
...: THICKNESS IN f'EET QVATt*~A*Y 30
<l*I (lt K*d ALLUVIAL DEl"OSITS ALLUVIAL TERAAC£S EDWARDS LIM£STOM£ i
! I
.:: JI
...s u
1 Boo
]I ......
C I
100 Kcp CO~CHE PEAK LIMESTONE
~
I
- C u
...... r--.....- --
l X
WALNUT FORMATION (SHALE)
':t 100 Kw*
I J I 100 Kpx PALUXY SAND ! :;; ~
,,,. ...3 ~ i.aoo
.... I. LIHESTONE AND SHALE ~ >
~
-0 z
OR CLAYSTONE LOW£*
CRETACEOUS I 80-90
-- ----- J
- II. MASSIVE LIHESTONE '-lw z
..,z CL.
~;1 ... ~
vt:i CCMlNCM£ II 60-70 LIMESTONE ANO SHALE HRl£S GLEN ltOSE
-- ~---- ) Kgr LI ME STONE I 111. Olt CLAYSTONE; 0-1 o., ...
..., ;i 111 60-65 MASSIVE LIMESTONE ...~"' g I
-- ~---- IV. LIMESTONE ANO SHALE C 0..
ii I IV 30-40 j OR CLAYSTONE "'
f ,:.. .... --
~
i jl w
,w ..,
i l+OO
=' --
Ktm TWIN MOUNTAINS SANDSTONE 250
.. z C
i I '-l
~
j g 2500 c:,
PENNSYLVANIAN t'
1 SERIES Pmw MINERAL WELLS CLAYSTONE STRAWN
- (65 FEET OF THIS FORMATION PENETRATED IN SITE BORINGS)
TII
~i :;;i.;:
w u 111 1tE*CAf11 NOT TO SCALE Amendment 67 KEY: x EXPOSED FORMATION WITHIN 5 KILES OF SITE February 5, 1988
.t. STATION SITE POSITION COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOCAL GEOLOOIC COLUMN FGJIIE 2
- 5 . 1- 11
\
\ '
J
\ I !
\ I I I
I
\\ I I {
I I I
I I r l l I
I I I I I r
I I \ I I I \ I I I
\
\
I
'\
\ I I
I
\ I \ I
\ I r
\ Kgr I I
( I
\
\ t I
\ I I
\ I I f I
\ I I I
'.._,_ I I
,;,',...., ,, / 1 I
' ,, / {
',.,... I I
I I
I I
I I
Qal I I
I I
I t
,....,,.,. J Kgr I
I Kpx Kgr
(
i \
/
I (
l_)
I PEAK S.E.S.
I I I COMANCHE NALYSIS REPORT I I FINAL SAFETY A d 2
/ / UNITS 1 an Kpx ,_,
I ,;
SITE GEOLOGIC MAP
!GOO ENDMENT 87 AM DECEMBER 18, 1992 2.5.1-12
- c GAMMA l-o.. RES ISTI VITV RAY Li.I Cl 0
I ZONE I 50 UPPER 58 LOWER 74 u.J z:
0 100 I-V, ZONE II u.J
- E
..... I
...J 139 150 ZONE IIIA I 158 200 201 ZONE IV I
233 CJ) z
-z 250
~ ~ ...........--.---.....
z 1- TWIN MOUNTAINS
- J <t FORMATION 0~
~ 0::
~~
~
I- L - - - - - L - - L . . __ _ J __ ____.__ __.294 300 0 40 80 0 100 200 300 400 (COUNT/SEC/IN) (OHMS PER INCH)
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT BASED ON BORING P-10 UNITS 1 and 2 LITHOLOGIC SECTION Amendment 67 AT PLANT SITE February 5, 1988 FIGURE 2. 5, 1-13
Water Well N~Bt;v Son to Fe RR
-~
~
Cleburne I
- 011 test - Dr Y ond abond oned L.rne of Section - -
Note* Borin revealed gs at CPSES f cloystone vonoble ( quantities 0
shale) wI*th* instead of in the GI limestone en Rose and T
- tains for . wm Moun*
motion PALUXY SAND Elev 7 71 _
Elev. 70S _
Elev. 6 46 _
Elev. 61S _
,, ~per Water Sand
.c a.
z
)> ("') 0
'1)
(./) ro *-
-I (j') ~
(./) ~ C )> )> ..., )::>
(=Trinity or Trav1s. p
...... -I
-I ....... z rii z ro cr ro 3 Lower Water Sand 0f water eok Sand well drillers) mm - -I ("') -s
~ -I -< I C. 0.
- I Ol <)::,,
.... -0 (J') )> m p., 3
.....I n...........
- c _.z -s ro
'< ::I
..... OJ )> 7J ,.+ TO 508 WELLS
-r::,.
z<> :::i ~ m <.Tl TO !l!H7 TO 4!104 Q. (j') )>
~ O'\ TOIU!l
-.I N (/) 7' .,_.
I.D
- JJ (j') CD a rn m*
- JJ (J) co 0 10 15 t<ORIZONTAL SCALE IN MILES 20
-I
ll 230, ooo
~
--,. ,. ' trso.
- ~
..... ___ _,660
--*-670
- soO \
~
AMENDMENT 87 DECEMBER 18, 1992 LEGEND: 1 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
e BORING LOCATIOH , FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
,,,. - -. BEDROCK CONTOURS UNITS 1 and 2
~ G'OUNO SURFACE COPURS VICINITY BEDROCK CONTOUR MAP 0 IOOOFT FIGURE 2.5.1-15
G
- 72)
/
Information Withheld in' Accordance with 10C FR 2 .390 J
I COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 NATURAL GAS AND OIL DJPELINES AND WELLS WITHIN FIVE MIL ES OF C:P~F~
FIGURE 2 . 5 . 1- 17
><00D ANO SOMl AV( l l COUNTI ES, TEXAS SC ALE +N I tE 1
- O~ ...
~ - *O:QL__ $~ - *000 Cl(Cf;M8[1'{ 31, 1100 111tv , u G, T[XAS H.J GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
N A 0 oo
- 10. _,.--,---,....~1.0° 90° NUMBER OF SEGMENTS MEASURED -o 5 10 15 20 25 30 - 900 DIRECTIONS AND FREQUENCIES OF STRAIGHT STREAM SEGMENTS w IN LOWER HALF OF PALUXY BASIN E N
B 900 w NUMBER OF FRACTURES MEASURED - 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 E 900 STRIKES AND FREQUENCIES OF STRUCTURAL TRENDS IN LOWER HALF OF PALUXY BASIN COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
Reference:
Howell, 1967, Unpublished senior thesis, Bay,lor University. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 RELATIONSHIP OF STREAM CHANNEL ALIGNMENTS TO STRUCTURAL TRENDS IN LOWER PALUXY BASIN FIGURE 2 , 5, 1-18
A' I I I
-+*-*-*+-*-*-i*
. . i AREA MAP AREA COVERED BY THIS FIGURE A
0 25 50 Miles 1!!!!!5iiiiiiiiii1!!!!5iiiiiiiiil~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~
A Meridian -
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT SOURCE: Boone, P., 1963 UNITS 1 and 2 PRE-CRETACEOUS PALEOTOPOGRAPHY FIGURE 2.5.1-19
0 K L A H O MA
~ No swelling, granitic Q Low swelling, little or thin montmorillonite
~ Medium swelling, montmorillonite cloy High swelling, montmori llonite cloy 0 100 200 MILES COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Modified ofter Corter,' The Soils of Texas',
Texos Agric. Exper. Sta. Bulletin No. 431, 1951.
DISTRIBUTION OF EXPANSIVE SOILS FIGURE 2.5.1-20
PRESSURE IN LBS / SQ. FT.
0 8 g
.01
,02 u
~
(./)
UJ a ,03
- 5 z:
0
,04
~
\:
Ei \
(./)
- z: \
8 .05
,06 DEPTH DRY DENSITY BORING MOISTURE CONTENT FEET LBS/FT3 P-lOA 265.2 105,4 13,4 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA FIGURE 2,5,1-21
U !STING GROUND SORfACt 800 '-
GLEN ROSE LIMESTONE 750 ,_ lltT UNIT WEIGHT
- 155 LS./FT. 3 700 -
EL.670' l..!'. EXISTING PIEZOMETRIC LEVEL IN THE TW!N MOUlffAINS FORMATION 650 ,_
Et.610'-
600 ~ ASS UMPTl Cl;S
.....,.., TWIN MOUNTAINS FORMATION l. WATER LEVEL IN GLEN ROSE LIMESTONE
.... WET UNIT WEIGHT
- 135 LBS./FT. 3 REMAINS CONSTJ\llT AT EL. HD' *
- "; 2. P!EZOMETRlC LEVEL IN THE Tl/IN l>KJUNTAINS 550 ~ FORMATION DROPS FROM EL.670' TO EL.SO',
~
160'
~
POINT A LAYER l El .530' 500 -
450 ~ l..!'. P!EZOMETRIC LEVEL AFTER ASSUMED DRAWOOWN 400 '-
150' LAYER 2 350 ~
300 L---------------------------....L-SETTLEMENT CALCULATIONS USE THE fOLll)\,/JNG EQUATION:
Where S
- Settlement 1n feet H
- Layer of thickness 1n feet Cc~ Slope of conso1idation curve on strain vs log pressure plot
? 1 f= Effective stress after drawdown in psf P' = Effective stress before drawdown in psf 0
~ filLl Di vi de Twin Mountains two 1ayers anC find Calculate settlement in each la.yer effer.tiv~ stresses in layer at midpoint (A & B) 3;!~*
1 At~ P' 0 * (200' + (80' x !J5 lb/ft3) - Layer l S * (160')(,034) lo910 (~ 0,55
{140 X
- 33,064psf P' f * (200' x 155 1h/ft3 ) + (80 x 135 ]b/ft3)
- 41,800 psf Layer 2 s* (150')(.034) Lona l~~:iU1,o,61 At _11, P' 0 * (200' X 155 + (225' X 135 1b/ft3) - TOTAL SUBS !DENCE 1.16' (295 62.4 42,964psf X
Ai1ENDMENT 4 JAtWARY 31. 1979 P' f * (200' x 155 lb/ft3) + (150' , 135 1b/ft3) +
{75 (135 lb/ft3. 62.4 lb/ft3)l *56,695psf COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SUBSIDENCE CALCULATION FIGURE 2,5,1-22
l r
I COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 lEGENO Ellenburger-Structure Map PRODUCING GAS WELL
- PRODUCING OIL WELL ORY ANO ABANDONED WELL FIGURE 2.5.1-23 PERMITTED LOCATION NL NO LOG ONP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SCALE IN FEET 32000 0 32000 64000 4189' TOP OF STRUCTURE (SUBSEA) y ***-......- ... t
I I I
/
I I
I
\
\\
r,
[
LE6£Nfl lenburger-Structure Map PRODUCING GAS WELL DRY All!() ABANDONED WELL PLUGGED WfLL JULY 27, 1978 FiGURt 2.5. f;:23a PERMITTED LOCATION CONTOUR INTERVAL* 100 FEET NI. NO LOG ONP 010 NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES, TEXAS
-4!J$2' TOP OF STR*,CTURE (SUBSEAl NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1- And aooc, SCALE IN FEET o aooo Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections A-A' And 8-8 1
, pectively MAY, 1978
"*V'il'il""---- ...
LINE OF CROSS SECT,ON,, DALLAS, TD.AS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC
- l.
-4000
/
,)91*
\ .fli
\
\
! \
c;o-¢
\
.,,fl/ ;. I
.I§ Z, ~ ,' f>I f 0 r
- , qov -
';", ~9 ~e~ -, _ : />,,
~*- "",..,' *,#;;-<. . .
p39(>Q , ., >~ .is**.,,
- l .
-~~;t.,j:)
- )9
'JSO(y
--~ .
\
-\
I
.****\'\,,'.
\
\
\'
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 I
LEGEND Marble Falls-Structure Map D PRODUCING GAS WELL DRY AND ABANDONED WELL 0 PLUGGED WELL AMENDMENT 2 FIGURE 2
- 5. 1-2 4 PERMITTED LOCATION JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 100 FEET NL ONP NO LOG 010 NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SOMERV~LL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES. TEXAS SCALE IN FEET
-3841' TOP OF STRUCTURE (SUBSEAI
_NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And 8000 Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections MAY, 1978
~-=-0 8000 16000 LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS A-A And B-B ResoectivP.lv 1 1
- DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
+
20N INl 8 00 0 0 8,000
~
16,000 24,000 S CALE: lii'-==--==----c::===1----
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 NOTE: Marble Falls Structure THE GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION REPRINTED HEREIN rs THE PROPERTY OF THE GEOMAP COMPANY. AND AMENDMENT 16 Geo Map HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM THEIR MAP NO. MBFL- MARCH 31, 1981 T29A, Horizon A, (Notice 1/23/81). FIGURE 2.5.1-24 0
\
.: I Ii N: ,..: I Ne f-----_L_~'-'!i_
QlvL
/II(.
-t ;c
., :t<J.. -.~
r COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 I
V Marble Falls-Net Hydrocarbon LEGEND v PRODUCING GAS WELL Isopachous Map DRY AND ABANDONED WELL FIGURE 2.5.1-25 0 PLUGGED WELL 0 PERMITTED LOCATION AMENDMENT 2 CONTOUR INTERVAL* 10 FEET NL NO LOG JULY 27, 1978 SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES, TEXAS ONP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SCALE IN FEET E6' NET THICKNESS OF PlllY NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 and 8000~1"1~!'Jii"'"l~~O~~iiiiiiii~8000~~"1iiiiiiiiiiiiil~6000 Figure 2.5.1-31 for Cross Sections MAY, 1978 LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS A-A 1 and B-8 1 ' respectively. DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
\ i N,
~~, ~::,
It.'\, "
~ >>~ I
\ 1--r
\
\ J,~
-J
\ ~,
\I
\ J, COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 I
LEGEND Big Saline-Structure Map
-0 PRODUCING GAS WELL 0 ORY ANO ASANOONEO WELL 0 PLUGGED WELL AMENUMEIH 2 FIGURE 2.5.1-26 c, PERMITTED LOCATION JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL= 100 FEET NL NO LOG DNP OIO NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES. TEXAS SCALE IN FEET
-$652' TOP OF STRUCTURE (SUBSEA) NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 and 8000 0 8000 16000 Figure 2.5.1-31 for Cross Sections MAY, 1978
~.+/--:':---***- iii]
LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS A-A 1 and B-8 1 , respectively. DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
COMANCHE PEAKS.ES.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LEGEND Big Saline-Net Hydrocarbon PRODUCING GAS WELL Isopachous Map ORY ANO ABANDONED WELL FIGURE 2.5.1-27 PWGGED WELL AMENDMENT 2 PERMITTED LOCATION JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL* 10 FEET NL NO LOG ONP 010 NOT PENETRATE MAPPEO HORIZON SOMERVE;LL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES, TEXAS SCALE IN FEET 15' NET THICKNESS OF PAY NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And 8~&:::: 8000 16000 Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections MAY, 1978 LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS A-A' and B-8 1 , Respectively DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
i
.I
/
\
COMANCHE PE Jl.K S. E. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS *1 and 2 LEGEND Strawn-Structure Map PRODUCING GAS WELL DRY ANO ABANDONED WELL PLUGGED WFLL AMrnDMEIH 2 FIGURE 2.5.1-28 PERMITTED LOCATION JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL, 100 FEET NL NO i..OG SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUl"-JTIES, TEXAS DNP OiO NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON
- 1980' 10P OF STRUCTURE (SU8SEA) rWTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And 8000 SCALE IN FEET 0 8000 ,6000 Figure 2.S.1-31 For Cross Sections WaV"'>>1 - . !
A-A' and 8-t3' , Resµect i ve ly MAY, 1978 DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC _ _ J
---*-*- LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS
I ,.,:
0 NL 0 N, _l_
NL1, NL 1---}
r COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 I
Strawn-Net Hydrocarbon
..!:..f.6£NO PRODUCING GAS WELL Isopachous Map
- >RY AND ABANDONED WELL FIGURE 2.5.1-29 0 PLUGGED WELL AMENDMENT 2 0 PERMITTED LOCATION JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL* 10 FEET NL NO LOG DNP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD C8UNTIES, TEXAS SCALE IN FEET 43' NET THICKNESS OF PAY 1~0TE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And aooo~P'I~~~~o~~iiiiiiiiiieooo~~~~l6000 Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections MAY, 1978 LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS A-A' and B-~ Respectively 1
, DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCl~TES, INC.
LOCAL GEOLOG,C NORTHWEST SOUTHEAST COLUI.'!',
A A'
'J '... COAP MID *CO~-..;Nf;,.T PfTRfJ,_('.JM CORP "fHE BARON CO M E OAVlS Mcit<if:;1h No Sauo"" ,: eeli ,:,,ctLi, No! *B Ne*¢:/\ No \ T 11 Cousm1
... oh11 Ect1<1is SJt'HY SOW£RYE:.;o ~~~tp' ru AS
)<1tf LMj<;fJ 1-1>4-B~St: L0WE"1. CA:ETACEOL.:S SJO '.1-1
'S
~I I l C) 0 i
~ i z
' OATUM 2000 SUBSEA 0 4 Mties
- ---;-,., 3. 3 M1ifi i I 3 2 Miles
';=, i 5 Mile, 6 3 Mile$ :!, ~~
"' ~ z
. ~._,_I' 1
{ ~
(
. ,.*"' i I <(
'/~..~
..J
)-
_....- _ r
"'z
)
e-I z
w CL z.:;,_1)
I
.-re; 2.
~ ~
I
- l
?"'
7::
1 t' - ~
- ~
~- ?--
r I;.l 0
- r
- 1-..:c:'
Ur
_j t
~
I t' U)
,.. u 01
}- wW
- II"'" i TOP er ifia
- :
~ 0~
rWTE: See Figure 2.5.l-23A for location of cross section.
z
"'" ~
"'§ a"'z u u,
0 COMANCHE PEAK SE.S. <,:
X > :
- 0 a
~ 0 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ~
I-z UNITS 1 and 2 ::,
0 u
_, 1-1000 ANO SOMERVELL COUNTIES , TEXAS V£RTCA,. SCA.;..E *"I FEET Northwest To Southeast ,>
._J UJ ")G ?*)C .',00 -=,r;o
§l~
i a:
l\MErWMENT 2 Structural Cross Section A-A' HORIZONTAL AS i'iOTED
~ ,~
z CD JULY 27, 1978 31: ;;~e ~
Mt.> ,p~
DO ::.*t, ;,~ *t* 4s h J GRUY ANO ASSCCATES INC
- r: (/')
(,)
FIGURE 2.5.1-30 -PRE-CAMB
SOUTHWEST NORTHEAST B B' 011_ CORP WE soro OIL COMPA.tfY D Al;,.e'.N/ THE BARON (0 8 M FiTZG~AALD No.I 8 W Wonr, '\lo I* A Brone-n Ror,ch Nol-8 Nel!:l:i W1 l,01"'1 Monr, Sur,e)
,-.c,oo TEXAS GUL;:- ENERGY ANO MlNERALS CO.US
!J
'i I
I, 1000 1500' 0
0
- z
<i 2' ;z DATUM 28Mres 2 Miles l <(
?i' ~
l ~ ~
z
<(
...J
)-
1!
l "';z
< z i-
< ;: '_;, w
- 2500' a.
3000' 3500' 4000'
! ~4500'
(/')
(.f)
>- 'L t;_j 2'
t;:i
<{<f
~
,. v;n:
~ ow ID >,
NOTE: See Figure 2.5.l-23A for i
' 5000' location of cross section.
z
<(
'I u
0 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. 0 rr I 0 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 5500' UNITS 1 and 2 HOOD AND SOMERVELL COUNTIES , TEXAS Southwest to Northeast AMENDMENT 2 0
I JULY 27, 1978 Structural Cross Section B-b,. , I I! 6000' FIGURE 2.5.1-31
C o ff c C \i A
- - - PALUXY SANO/GLEN ROSE CONTOUR GLEN ROS£ MARKER BED N
I
"' I
/
I A DATUM: BASE PALUXY SAND/TOP GLEN ROSE LIMESTONE CONTOUR INTERVAL 25 FT.
X=OUTCROP POINTS 0
======"' 2 Ml.
' .. C
'\
/
- ~ /
Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRUCTURE MAP OVERLAY UPPER GLEN ROSE MARKER BED ZONE I/ZONE II FIGURE 2.5.1-32
JACK GRYNBERG &ASSOCIATES HOOPER N0.2 r i A GULF 01 L CORP.
C.L.CAMPBELL NO.I GULF OIL CORP. '-,
D.McINTOSH N0.1 '-
I '-'
B
' ~ W.
rJ8;S 0 tlJr:N2Ai{~f 0f5~~5?fp./ /
I. D. #2 1' "'BM
-V ... FITZGERALD INDEX TO STRUCTURAL CROSS-SECTIONS V / VAN MORRISON NO.l PALEOZOIC I / W.I.D. #3 I / A - A' FIGURE 2.5.1-30 GULF ENERGY AND MINERALS CO.U.S.
OTIS ROLLINS N0.1 I ~ B - B' FIGURE 2.5.1-31 I ,,/ DALLAS PROOUCTI ON CO.
BEN J. TAYLOR I / / HUBBARD NO .1 CRETACEOUS WIGGINS NO. l I / W. I. D. #1 4 C - C' FIGURE 2.5.1-34 w.r.o. #12 /
I / D - D' FIGURE 2. 5. 1- 33 0 I //
GULF OIL CORP. (R.D.ALLEN) 1,.. /
4,,,-- --+ VICINITY GEOLOGIC MAP r I FIGURE 2.5.1-10 AND BRATTEN RANCH N0.1-A - --0 CPS::S
~ - - - THEBA;JVRON co.\ [IT[ l
+-
I
- OUTCROP STRUCTURAL MAP FIGURE 2. 5.1-32 NELON N0.1-B ,,
GULF ENERGY A~D MINERALS co.u.s./M WI D # 21 \ DI AND RELATED CRETACEOUS MAPS BRATTEN RANCH. 7 / * * * \
/ SINGER-LAYNE TEXAS
/ ,, \ \TEXAS UTILITIES WW NO .1 I \ C' I / \
DE SOTO OIL CO. / e,O. e,O. \ OIL PROSPECTORS {C.H.KADANE ET AL)
B. W. WANN NO. 1 / '(>~~~vv \ M.M.BUNT ET AL NO.l
~<:P \
\
\
/" ',,
0 2 SCALE IN MILES 3 4
\< ,,
5 MI LE RAD I US
\
\ \
AMENDMENT 4 JANUARY 31, 1979 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
NUCLEAR PLANT
\
\ PLYMOUTH (M.E.DAVIS) 1/2_
T.H. COUSINS N0.1
\
V A'
UNITS 1 and 2 STRUCTURAL CROSS-SECTION LOCATIONS FIGURE 2.5.1-33
10 5 0 5 MILES MILES GULF ENERGY &MINERALS CO. U.S. SITE OTIS ROLLINS NO. 1 W.I.D.#12 C BEN J. TAYLOR C' WEST 0 WIGGINS NO. 1 EAST 0
1000 GAMMA RAY p SINGER-LAYNE TEXAS 100(
0 G1._ctv~I.J-ky TEXAS UTILITIES 0
Ros/':--!:'ltvlJ 0 WATER WELL NO. 1 l1fi1£:~
~ sro"'c 0
900 900 0 RESISTIVITY 0 0 OIL PROSPECTORS (C.H.KADANE ET AL)
N 0
SELF POTENTIAL M.M. BUNT ET AL NO.l
' ' 0
' ' ' <'Otv,'I:
C 800 GAMMA RAY
< 800
<'o~ ~
0 0 0 'I:,,
M 0 N '---
1-
~
_J w 0
> 0 w
_J M SELF POTENT 1AL 0
0 RESISTIVITY
<C w
V) 0 N \>r -
0 c::(
w w
600 k: <'otv, 600 V1
'I: I L
!Jr 0
co c::(
0 0
<'o4'c I I/lb
'a w 0
co
...:r- c::(
z 0
..... 0 z 1-c::(
0 M 0 N
- 0 I-
> 500 <C w 500 s:
~
_J w w 0 _J 0 w
'°
' LINE-OF-SECTION: INDEX MAP FIG. 2.5.1-33 400 400 GAMMA-RAY AND RESISTIVITY LOGS CORRELATED AMENDMENT 4 300 WITH LOGS OF CORE BORING P-10 AT SITE. JANUARY 31, 1979 300
{FIG. 2.5.5-17)
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
0 NUCLEAR PLANT 0
'° UNITS 1 and 2 200 200 CRETACEOUS STRUCTURE WEST TO EAST CROSS-SECTION C-C' FIGURE 2.5.1-34
15 10 5 0 MILES NORTHWEST SITE SOUTHEAST JACK GRYNBERG &ASSOCIATES HOOPER NO. 2 D D' GULF OIL CORP.
GAMMA RAY C.L. CAMPBELL NO. 1 0
W. I. D. #2 MID-CONTINENT PETROLEUM CORP.
SQUAW CREEK CATTLE CO. NO.l 800 800 0
0 o.... - SINGER-LAYNE TEXAS TEXAS UTILITIES WATER WELL NO. 1 700 GAMMA RAY 0 700 0
0 SELF POTENTIAL RESISTIVITY 0
1-w SELF POTENTIAL 0 1-0 w
~ 600 600 ~
.....J RES IST l VITV w .....J
> w w >
.....J w
.....J c;::
w er:
v, 500 w w 500 (/")
> 0 w 0
cc 0 >
CV"\ 0 c;:: co z Cf?Er, c;::
0 -1c8 z Pc;yJY. Dus .....
0 I-iw 400 0;z 400 1-w
_J 1/41V14/V w
.....J 0
0 w l(\
LINE-OF-SECTION: INDEX MAP
' FIG. 2.5.1-33 300 0
" C 300 0
I.(\
200 GAMMA-RAY AND RESISTIVITY LOGS CORRELATED WITH LOGS OF CORE BORING P-10 AT SITE.
(FIG. 2.5.5-17) c S,----_
200 AMENDMENT 4 JANUARY 31, 1979 COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
NUCLEAR PLANT 0
UNITS 1 and 2 0
'° CRETACEOUS STRUCTURE NORTHWEST TO SOUTHEAST CROSS-SECTION 0-0' FIGURE 2.5.1-35
3
"'Tl z)> 0 "Tl )::,
r c5 G"> ro C rr, (/)~
- lJ ;:o (/')
m 3: rr, C )> )>
(/')
z ri:J z ZONE O- NO DAMAGE
(/')
- -I 0 ZONE 1- MINOR DAMAGE N
(/')
l'Tl 3:
...... -I -< I
)> m ZONE 2- MODERATE DAMAGE
<.Tl :z
)::,
('"')
- o (I) z)> -u ZONE 3- MAJOR DAMAGE
- z ......
~
N I
0 (/') OJ m 1--'
'"CJ
- ,,;
- ::::, !=2 )>
0.. (I) ;;,:::
rr, 3:
- o )
- :, N (/)
- ,,;
- '"CJ
...... :0 ~ SOURCE:
- z mm Algermissen and Perkins, 1973 (64)
(/') -u .
0 (/)
- 0 .
-I
019'6 f:T- rv 0
~ 1963 38 1970 0 N -'ll 1974 "'
I ,, 0 V "-.,
n l.._.*19.:_:4 "-.,
(
I V ""' Q, '-'
cc, OUACHITA PROVINCE C WICHITA DURo BAS l N 056 RED RIVER V ARCH CENTRAL TEXAS SHELF
() II E S T CENTRAL 196.5 ff TEXAS PROVINCE EASl SUBPROV!NCt I
I; "'~
"' \
0
\ 1353 y
~/
I 0
!S!'.11
,., >,, I ,Mc ,215\)lY 382 1_11- n, I 11, 1 c1l GU L F COA S T PROVINCE
- PROVINCE BOUNDARY SUBPROVINCE BUUNDARY COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
LARGE STRUCTURAL ARCHES PREDOMINANT SURFACE FAULT TRENDS FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PREDOMINANT SUBSURFACE FAULT TRENDS UNITS 1 and 2
()
TECTONIC PROVINCES AND EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER MAP FIGURE 2.5.2-2
100°
---r---+--+-----1-L/_L,____Ltri I l *N l
/ : I - I I II-,,) (
- I ~ I '
\
30°*-f--+--t--__J__ _l_ _l_ _J_ _J_ _ j___+---+--+---r-30° I
0 100 200 SCALE IN MILES LEGEND
....--..,soSEISMALS
- LOCATION OF INTENSITY REPORTS COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT o EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER UNITS 1 and 2 I-XI I INTENSITY (MODIFIED MERCALLI) 1882 BONHAM (PARIS) TEXAS Doceka l ( 69) EARTHQUAKE ISOSEISMAL MAP FIGURE 2. 5. 2-3
92°
(? '"' "' l.__ ,
LIMIT OF FELT AREA MISSISSIP:I Marksville
- ; ~o o--- 3 0
~-*
1)1
- - * - * - * - * ~-........0 * ~. 0 3
i St, Francisville I _ IV
- 3 4 4 0 2
0 IV - V ** ** 3
- ovingt
- * ** 4
~laqueminE:
- le 0
courtvil sonv JOO 0 V_ VI f"'l.3*4 *
!apole,mville l ** Alleman kli~ 3-4 *,. City 4
- y_ l. 5 ***
3-4 Thibodaux 0
0
(;VLF OF MEXICO LEGEND:
4 Denotes Rossi-Forel intensity at reporting location I-IV Denotes range in Rossi-Forel intensities intensities reported in contoured area 0 20 40 60 Mites SCALE COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 1930 DONALDSONVILLE, LA.
REFERENCE:
Neumann (24) EARTHQUAKE ISOSEISMAL MAP FIGURE 2.5.2-4
110* 10s* 100° 98 *
(./)
C)
C
- 0 C'")
o Ve:fu II Ill z
CD C
3 p,
- I
- I p,
- I 0..
oela.irem
- l'*
t co 0
0..
CD
- 0
- 0 V)
-I
)>
-I 0
o o.-* _!lA 0 Ode sa.
C: 2~~* / I N -I V1 T
-...J J'TI
- x 0
--1.~~JT_*______;t--+----.-13 r- ....
0 J'TI V) 0 30° AUG. 16 VIII
-n ):>
@ ~
- lJ ::x::
m .o C
):>
'° w
28' __
f[_
I --+----- I 0 hihuahua N rn
- e::
- I 3abina~o 01 N
(./)
~ -i
(./)
- I JMf E C u I oJimineJ 01 rn -i
..... rn
(./) ~
$ (./)
r 108° 106° 104
- 102' 100* 98'
960W
_,/', I
~
' ELLIS ///'
/'/ '-*
~ HENDERSON I
\ _,,,,,, / ?___(, '
\ V\_./
CORSICANA -
HILL 32°N-~--;:-~~-=-7-~--------~J__ _ _ _ _~
NAVARRO R ,
,/
/ /. 1./ P-*-- , \
Sellards (33)
)
LIMIT OF FEL.T AREA~
\/ ).,
., - u~/'
_. _ / .
\
ANDERSON
\,'{Z/1{ k~'\*
TEHUACANA' \. -'1-...
z~XI,~
NOAA EPICENTER(1191)
'\ ~ J I ~
6 \
PRAiiIE HILL r
\ \ 0 TEAGUE FREESTONE "' _
,/,
' \ LIMESTONE \ I /-
- ~L 1 * ,,,..,.,
MC /
LEN N A N 'GROESBECKO
- OOCEKAL EPICENTER (69) 1
-I ,,,,- _/
y 1 ,, '
\
\
'--o"'
THORNTON
,,,,--iI
/"
'\ /'
\
FALLS
~-/ ~. LEON
\ \
/,, ~
\' / .. ~ * ' RO BERTSON '\
_,,-,_L-____j
/ . z-3lON-7~r-'-~-~--j.J'-~------~*"r-~L_,,_
,k-
\v\ I ,,,,,/ },
MADISON I \
MILAM I -~ / i COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
. , , , OIL OR GAS FIELD UNITS 1 and 2 FAULT, HACHURES ON D0WNTHR0WN SIDE 1932 WORTHAM-MEXIA EAR1'HQUAKE LOCATION MAP FIGURE 2. 5. 2-6
AFTER BRAZEE (1972}
Ref. 2.5-88 v11,---,----,.---r---,---,--""T-"--r--""I:::::=--I L..----'~
~-
~/"'
i:: ,,,,
~ v11--........l--~--.£.+.---I----+--~--+--+-----'
r Vl,.._ /
~i V j V
V 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 ARE.A OF MMIV OR GREATER (1000 SQ MI)
A. Felt Area - Modified Mercalli Intensity Relationship for Eastern and Central U. S. Earthquakes AFTER FLAWN (1970)
Ref. 2.5-89 35
,1 I
30 t I MEXIA FIELD I I I I OIL PRODUCTION HISTORY 25
......6 t I
l u I Q.-.. 20 I
~!'.:!
""l:Q I
I
\
\
g! 15 I
l I
I
\
\.
\
- cl
~
~ 10 '
I
\
I I ' \
\
'v 5 , ... ,.
,./
I ...... _ ...
0 1920 1922 1924 1926 1928 1930 1932 TIME YEARS B. Mexia Field Oil Production History COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 MEXIA EARTHQUAKE OBSERVATIONS FIGURE 2
- 5
- 2- 7
102* 98° 96° 94* 92*
- L* I 38*1---+"G;;:i;;;i'l3/4-----,4""~='----+-!.!..-+---:-;:,,q..-::--J--4---t--,c,;;-
r'ltoll,,. r oll KA OKLA o,; t o11 rex. ..,._
&w..,.
36°1---t--Jf--H ---l~~---!.-1~~
.~~J
~i 0 31 32° 1--t---l---l-~ ,._l-----,l--- --t---k--- -=~f-'-:~-- 32° Statute Miles lln.dyo 6- st Tho 8
98° 95* 94* 92° COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 1952 EL RENO, OKLAHOMA SOURCE: Murphy,L.M. and Cloud,W.K. (27) EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY MAP FIGURE 2. 5, 2-8
100' 99' 98" 97* 96' KANSAS 37*
36" 36' OKLAHOMA Limits of Felt Area 35* 35*
TEXAS a:,* 33' 3
0 100* 99*
17 June 1959, 04:27:07 CST 0!020 40 60 80 100 32*
E3 F:--::-:::-3 E-----------3 Scale of Miles 96' COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SOURCE: Eppley,R.A. and Cloud,W.K. (93) 1959 SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA EARTHQUAKE ISOSEISMAL MAP FIGURE 2.5.2-9
OKLAHOMA ARK.
NEW MEXICO TEXAS NOTE: Other gypsum and/or onhydrito strata ore known* to exist in the subsurface.
LEGEND
,:;f!j Outcrops of gypsiferous formations x Anhydrite uplift 20"...,... ldohytetal-mean annual precipitation Subsurface Salt-Anhydrite deposition (j) Balcones Fault Zone 100 200 Mexia-Talco Fault Zone COMANCHE PEAK S.ES SOURCES: A. A. Meyerhoff, W. Paine; "Interactions among Tectonics, Sedimentation and Hydro- FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT carbon Accumulation", in Gulf Coast Assoc. UNITS 1 and 2 of Geol. Socs. Trans., 1970.
Brune, 1965. U.S.Weather Bureau, 1965. DISTRIBUTION OF GVPSIFEROUS FORMATIONSJ ANHYDRITE UPLIFTS AND LOUANN SALT FIGURE 2.S.?-]f)
WEST EAST V) j-.--BALCONES FAULT ZONE-..-j 0 WACO 1000' ~
.=
l.lJ
- ~~~%IJ O' a::
u a:
~;~~~i)
LU a..
a..
1000' V')
0 l.lJ
(...)
2000' t==
l.lJ a:
u a::
LU 3000' :31:
0
....J
,, 4000' z
)> (")
"Tl ci 0:,
ro 0 5 10 Miles C )::, C/) ~
- 0 r m C )> )> Horizontal Scale
("')
- o 0 oz
("')
z- i+l z
-l (")
N 01 u, rrJ u, u, -l -< I Cl) )> m N
u, .,,
("') C:
)::, -" z -0 I
...... w )> m
..... I-I'
- ) ~ )>
- a. Cl) :r;:
§t~ N C/)
z :0 '!)
l'T1 mm Modified after Baylor Geological Society
-0 .
0 C/)
- 0 .
Guidebook (1964), Fig. 3
-l
CONTROL WELLS GROUND EAST WEST SURFACE TERTIARY 1000' t-LU LU I.&..
-z
- x:
t-o.
UPPER CRETACEOUS LU C
2000' AUSTIN CHALK ii~:::=:::: :::;::::::::: ::::: .......... .. ~ *
!iii WOODBINE SAND ti ...........
3000' ..................... : : : :::::::: .... ,.
LOWER CRETACEOUS 0 1000 Feet Horizontal Scale COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
Modified after Lahee, Fig. 29 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Structure of Typical American Oil Fields UNITS 1 and 2 Vol. 1, 1929 MPG.
MEXIA FAULT ZONE CROSS SECTION FIGURE 2. 5. 2-12
INDEX MAP AREA *coVERED BY THIS FIGURE 0 50 MILES SOURCES: Structural Mop of Texa,11, N. E. Quod., l:500,000, 1946 Basement Rocks of Texos cmd Southeast New Mexico; 1:250,000, 1956 Geologic Atlas of Texas, Waco Sheet; 1:2,50,000; 1970 Weeks, A.W., 1945, p. 1735 Reaser, D.F., 1961, p. 1760 Domes & Moore Earthquake Epicenter Mop of Texas; 1:2,500,000; 1972
- COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
LEGENO FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
/ Contour on Basement Surface
/ (mean sea level datum) UNITS 1 and 2
/ Fault, downthrown side indicated 1950 FAULTS AND A Earthquake Epicenter BASEMENT CONFIGURATION
- Well penetrating basement rocks, used for control FIGURE 2. 5. 2-13
HOWELL ANO SCHULTZ (197!5) 2 ill z:
11,1 GUPTA AND z: - NUTTLI { 197ts) 3
- IC
.J ...
..J I
<I(
u 0 IC M C
lE 4 0
11,1 II.
0 0
a SAFE SHUTDOWN II EAIITHQUAK[
[VALUATION - - - - - ,
1 1'-o_ __..2.__o_...1,o_....1.40----,,i5o.,....---1..1.oo.,....-.1---2.1...oo--,,-s.1...oo,...4.,...o....o-aoo.L...,---1~00.__o.___.i....,2000 It
- KILOM!'.Tlltl 0 10 20 JO 50 100 200 300 400 100 1000 It- MILES EPICENT[II DISTANCE NOTES: BASIS FOR INTENSITY DATA INTENSITY VI I I - VALENTINE, TEXAS, 1931 INTENSITY VII - BONHAM, TEXAS, 1882
- EL RENO, OKLAHOMA, 1952 BASIS FOR COMPARISON (121,122,123)
Io - EPICENTER INTENSITY I(R) - INTENSITY AT DISTANCE R COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EARTHQUAKE ATTENUATION F6URE 2.5.2-14
U'1 .... aa*s a.
IS:I ISi N
01 lt1 ISi
- r ll I
ISi \ t ae*h l'5il
- r V
...a..
- c U'1 a:
...J w :z I-L,J c:::a I
a..
t..
C U'1
- i
...J t a*t w
V a::
w 0..
- i c:::a Cl I z Cl :c
- z
-a:z:
-gj :z- ~ t--~
U'1 L!l
- z L!l 0::
- l I-Cl I.Il ta >-
aa*,
11*1
~ ~ 14 ~ ~
I I I !!!
15d NI 553~15 II et ~
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN Pwr Sheet 1 of 25 FIGURE 2. 5 .4-1
BORING N .: P-1 DEPTH= 90.0-90.7 YOUNG'S MODULUS Dr ELASTICITY= ~00000 PSI llll.U nm.u 2'1111.U 2IU.U IBIIIJ.U lil 0.
z 1m.u l.J1 l.J1 120.D w
~
i-
'"Tl l.J1 9111.U z
,, )> (')
ro C)
C {/)
CJ) ~
- 0 m
.N
~i ffi {/)
C ~ )>
zmZ
- --l (')
61111.U u,
rt I
{/) --l -< I Nt-:1 (f) )> m ]Ill.Ill
~!z
.i:,.
I _. z -0 f---' ru )> m N ::, ~ )>
u, tu 0.. (f) A !l.D
§ N (f)
- ti 1/)
I 1:1 I. II et.
N ISi llil N mm
-0 .
0 (f)
- ti .
--l STRAIN lN PERCENT
BORING N.: P-~ OEPTH: ~9.6-60.3 YOUNG'S MOOULUS or ELASTICITY= 200000 PSI lBll!J.118 BIii.iii IJl 0..
z mm.111 IJl U1 w
0::
,, .t- 'Im.BIi U1 z)> n "Tl C)
,o en C
- lJ rn N
~;
IB en z
(/)
C )> )>
- -; n
- R
~
z a.mi U7 rt en I -; -< I w 1-3 (I) )> m
... z z~
~
I -0 I-' 0 Cl.l )> m t-h N :J ~ )>
U1 'O Cl. (f) ;;r;:: ii.ml
§ N (/)
0 I. 1.,1 N
et r:"'151 ISi ISi
- 0 mm
-0 .
0 (/)
IU m m -
- 0 .
-; STRRlN lN PERCENT
U1 0.
r mrz ISi ISi N
N L1 r,
11 I
ISi I-N V
t-Ul
\ + r.15* t
- c
..... a:
-1
- a. 1.iJ I-w z c:'::I Li.. w Cl V ct:
m tn
- J w
0.' -1
- J CL.
z C
. c:'::I CJ
- c aa*r z
-z
-z
~
1ll Ul n::
- a
- z n-:
CJ L!l ct:
I-U1 r:::a >-
~ I as*a mnr II II Ill Ill Ill ~ I!
Pl Ill Jlt Id ~ tl'f Sl tSd Nt 553~15 COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN FUJI' Sheet 4 of 25 FIGURE 2 .5 .4-1
BORING ND.: P-9 OEPTH: 36.1-36.B YOUNG'S t10ULUS or ELASTICITY= 320000 PSI H1111.81 ISIIB.1111 121111.1111 lil a..
z !1:111.ml lil lil w
a:;
J-
-n Ul z)>
., ro
("')
ci C Cf)
(/) ~
- 0 m
N gi
(!)
c z- ~ z
-i ("')
Cf)
U1 rt I Cf)
-i -< I m
~!
.i:,. Cl) )>
I I-' ...... z 7J H) z a., )> m N ::::i ~ )>
lT1 ltJ C.(/)7' l.l!lil
§ N (/)
- u (J) I l4l ct ~ ffl mm 7J .
0 (/)
- u
-i
_ _ _ _ _ _ _1.,___ _ _ _-_*- * - - - - - - *_ _ s~~-AI!_ ;_P_E_R_c_EN_r__r.i _ _ _ _ _-_*_ _ j
Lil ll"h a..
8 l{)
ID
. I'- a*t f.11 ll I >-
r-ISi
. t-V L,1 ll t 0
- I:
t-Lil a:
t- ..J I-a.. L&J z
L&J 0 1£. a*t w C V D'l Ul a::.
LJ I
a.. =-..J a..
. =-
0 n*t z C
C s:
z L!J z -z Lil L!J
-ca::.zc
[t:
=-C m*, I-C I.fl tD >-
11*1 a**
I ISd NI SS3M1S COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN PI.Or Sheet 6 of 25 FIGURE 2.5.4-1
lJ1 Cl.
nn* a N
01
,,,L1.
- r LO r---
11 Sl.' t I
- r. >-
N Li1 V
IIJS" r lJ1
- c a:
..... ...J t.,J I-IL t.,J :z c::::a LL. se* r w Cl V a::
en lJ1 w 1
Cl.
- J
...J a..
- J
- z
. 0 Cl l!H I Cl ~
- z L!l
- z -
lJ1 l!l
-a::z
- z a::
a:: :::J SI. "ll I-Cl Cl lI1 co >-
!Hf" ll Ii ti I!
ffl I
' lSd Ni 553tll5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN PI.Or Sheet 7 of 25 FIGURE 2 . 5. 4-1
lJ1 n.
N N
N N
lt1 lt1
. N N
lC 11 l >-
- r. 18"1
- r LO V
t-
- r:
t-lJ1 a:
a- .J t-a.. tJ z
l.aJ 0 I.&.. w Cl u*a V a,
a::
lJ1 LJ l :::> n..
a.. ..J 0
Cl z
Cl X:
z z lJ1 L!J z -LO a:
-a::
0 1h 1 a::
z t-
- > Ln Cl Cl ta >-
ar:.*a
~
I
~ ~ I I
I IN
=
- m =
Pl 15d NI 553M!5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN PLOI' Sheet 8 of 25 FIGURE 2
- 5 . 4-1
U1 a..
n*t ISi ISi Lt1 N
lD
. M
.S(. t
,.... II I >-
ISi ISi V-I-
11.s-r
- c I-U1 a:
I- ...J I-a.. lJ z
w 0 l.t.. .si: 1 w C V ct:
a, U1 w
..., a..
I ::I a.. ...J
- I z
. 0 C
C s:
z z U1 L!]
z -LC a:
ct:
z .s1.*1 I-a:: ::I U1 Cl C tQ >-
m*a I
I i
- Ct I.
lSd Nl 553Hl5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN PWI' Sheet 9 of 25 FIGURE 2. 5 .4-1
U1 Q.
n*,
1D ISi
+
LJ
- r N
. :r a, 11 l
V a,
..:c ....cc U1
....a.. ...I LJ w z 0 I.&.. w V
Cl a** 0:::
a, l
U1
- I w
Cl..
a.. ...I
- J z Cl
. 0 Cl 2::
- z: z L!J -
U1 a:
z 0:::
Cl LO z
- J Cl lh"I
.,_0:::
Ln to >-
n*a
~ I ~ I ~
a
.... I I ; I I.
15d NI 553Hl5 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN Pwr Sheet 10 of 25 FIGURE 2
- 5 . 4-1
1.11 a.
r,
- r LC
- r
. ltl r,
- r l II r,
r, t- 11*1
- r V
- c t-1.11 t- a: lt.."I
- a. .J t-w w z 0
t... I.a.I Cl a** V ISi a::
1.11 w
.::i c..
- a. .J
.::i 0 a*, z c:t Cl :c z z l!J z -z Ul L!'l
- cc ct:
a:: .::i t-Cl Cl Lil ta >-
at*
11*1 I.
~
I
- tSd NI 553Hl5 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STPAIN PWT Sheet 11 of 25
U1 N"h n.
l"1
- r tD a,
. I"'-
m*t
- r 1 II I"'-
tD t-
- r V n*t
- c t-U1 t- a:
- n. ...J I-LaJ L,J Ca z LI. a*z w Cl V tsl a::
U1 LJ I
n.
- J
...J a..
=:J z Cl
. 0 Cl
- I::
n*z.
z z l!l -
U1 a:
z a::
Cl LO z
- J Cl ll" f a::
t-u, r:a >-
n* I lll"I n**
II II I
~ I fSd Nf 553Hl5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN PWT Sheet 12 of 25 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4-1
U1 a..
n*,
151 151 151 UJ
. lSl l5l lt1 lt1 Ul
- r l
lt1 II t-V
- c t-U1 t- a: 11.*1 a.. ...J I-laJ laJ 0 z t... w ISi C
U1
- V a::
w I
a..
- J
...J a..
- J z Cl
. 0 C
z:
11*1 z
z l!J z -z U1 L!l a:
a::
tt: ::J I-Cl Cl U1 ta IE*I If .*
n**
I i I ISd Nf 553cf.LS COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN Pwr Sheet 13 of 25 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4-1
U1 ff"h a..
ISi ISi Ltl
- r EJ'l
. [I]
as*t lt1 I II lt1
[D t-lt1 V
- c t-U1 11"£ t-a.. _,
a:
~
L,.J L,J 0 z La.. a*t w C V ISi a::
Lil w I
a.. _,
=:J IL
=:J z
Cl
. 0 C
2::
n*i z z L!l z -UJ U1 a:
a::
z as*r ~
a: =:J U1 Cl C tC >-
n*r n*a
~ ~ I
~ ~
- ISd NI 553M15 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN PWT Sheet 14 of 25 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4-1
1.11 a..
n*r UJ ISi
+
ISi ID
. w ***
r--
lD l
- r r-- -
I-V
- c I-I-
1.11 a; ,,. ..
a.. ...J I-l,.J t,J Ca z I.a.. l,J ISi C
1.11
- V ct:
l,J I ::I Cl.
a.. ...J
- I z Cl
. 0 C
- c m-a z
l!]
1.11
- -az:
z a::
l !]
z
- I
- ct:
I-Cl C U1 l:Q >-
lt"I "IfSd NI 553Hl5 I
a I COMANCHE PEAK S. E. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN PIJJI' Sheet 15 of 25 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4 -1
I.II
- a. **z ISi ISi ISi ISi m
. ISi ISi s,.:,
,.... lt1 II IT'1 >-
I-
,.... V
.. I-a*'
- c I.II I- a:
a.. ...J I-l.,.J l.,.J 0 :z l,J La.. st* I CJ V l5l a::
I.II
- J w
l a.. ...J a.
- J
- z C
. 0 CJ s::
z I.II z
L!J
- z - a:
-a::
C L!J z
- J CJ n:1 a::
I-U1 ta >-
I II I! I I i I a I fSd NI 553~l.5 COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
FINAL SAFET*: ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 16 of 25 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4 -1
U1 a.. n*t 151 151
,.... ISl lD lt1 .Sf.. t N
l 11 N
lD N
V-I-
IS" I I-
- c U1 I- a:
a.. ..J I-t&J La.I c::::a z I.,.. n:1 w Cl V ct::
U1 w a..
l ::::J
..J a...
- J n*r z
. c::::a Cl Cl s:
- z z l!l z -:z U1 a:
-a:::
Cl L!l
- l C
s1.*1 ct::
I-lJ1 m >-
as**
.sz.*1 II! I.
a
- I5d N r *553~15 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 17 of 25 FIGURE 2 . 5
- 4-1
1.11 CL. ***i ISl ISl ISl
[IJ ISl ae*t lD lt1 fT'1 I II
- m. >-
...... es* t
- r fT'1 V
- x:
1.11 I- a: 1h. I a.. _J I-w w z Ca Lr.. LJ CJ It. I V a:::.
1.11 LJ
... , a..
l ::i a.. _J
- i z Q
CJ Cl ::c z
1.11 z
l!]
z -
L!l ae** cc a:::.
z I-0::: ::i Cl CJ Ln tll >-
es**
lh"I IZ.'I 11*1 I! = *II!
- =
m m m
=.
ISi ISi m
=
- *m m ISi
=*
1\1 ISi Ill 15d NI 553~15 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 18 of 25 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4- l
Ul D..
n*r Lr1
- r Lr1
- r Lr1
- r r,
I II r,
n**
to r, -
a-V
- c a-Ul a- a: 11.*1 D.. ...J t-w LJ z
0 LL. w CJ n*1 V ct:
Ul
.::s w l
a.. a..
... ...J
.::s 0
CJ IS"I z Cl s:
z I.!]
Ul
- -az:
z ct:
l.!l z
- J
- ct:
t-Cl CJ 1.11 tD lt"I II *1
~ ~
~
ffl I
- ISd NI SS3Ml.5 COMANCHE PEAK E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 19 of 25 FIGURE 2. 5. 4-1
Ln a.
n*,
LD ISi
+ lli"I M
. La.I lt1 lt1 l ll M
. >- n*
- r lt1 t-V
- c t-Lil .,...
l- a:
a.. ..J t-LiJ La.I z Ca
- u. l.tJ C as*
V Ct:
Lil l.tJ l ::i Q.
a.. ..J
- i z
. 0 C
as*
Cl s:::
z z Lil l!]
z - *** cc
-a:=
Cl L!J z
- i Cl Ct:
t-1.11 ta >-
at*
ll."I 11*1 n*
~ ~ ~ ~ 14 I.
I I I I a
- tSd NI 553M.l5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 20 of 25 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4-1
lJl CL.
o*i ISl ISi ISi ISi
. ISl LD 1a* I N
lD l ti N >- 19* I lD I-V I-
- c lJl .... t I- a:
0.. ...J .I-4J ~
0 z I.A.. LJ Cl 1z: t V a::
lJl LJ
- i a..
0.. ...J
- i z 0 11* I Cl Cl ::I:
z z l.!l z -
lJl l.!l 11&"1 a:
ct:
z .I-Ct: ::i Cl Cl U1 to >-
1s*a az:a
~
.
- . .= ~
ISIL Ill I
- - = = * .
Ill
~
I Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill In m r-- 11'1 'Z l"'I N 15d NI 553Hl5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 21 of 25 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4-1
t.n a.. aa*s ISi ISi
- r
. N
- r 1 11 111rs VI M
t-V
- c t-t.n t- a:
a.. -1 111*h 1:-
w w z 0
t... w Cl V M a::
t.n w I
a..
- J
-1 a..
Cl
- J 0
Cl
- c
- t z z z t.n l!J z -l!l a:
a::
z 1:-
a:: ;:J Lf1 Cl tfl Cl
>- ***i I
Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill D1 I
I I
. I.
m 151
~
,- =-
Ill m
m re I .
!:??
Ill Ill 1111 15d NI 553tll5 COMANCHE PEAK S. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 22 Of 25 FiGURE 2. 5. 4-1
U1 a..
n*z ISi ISi ISi
. :r 11* I
- r m
N I n lt1
. as*,
CD N
)-
V
- c
)-
U1
)- a: Ith.'
Cl. ..J w l.,J I-0 z t.&.. w Cl It" t V r, ct:
U1 w I
Cl.
=i
..J a..
=i z
. 0 Cl
... t Cl X:
z z U1 l!]
z -
l!] 18"1 a:
ct:
z I-ct: :::i Cl Cl Ul t:ll as**
lt'I n*a I! =! 111 I!
- = . I! I!
- =
. I! I! I
=
- m m Ill Ill
~
~
- r m
- r
- C"I E ltl ~ ~
ISd NI S53M15 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 23 of 25 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4-1
ll1 u*h a.
m m
m r-. a, m as*t lD I II ISi m
t-lD V
- c t-ll1 n*t t- a:
a.. ...J t-1aJ 41 z
°' la..
Cl as*, w V
- r Ct:
ll1
- a w I
a.. ...J a..
- a 0
Cl
, z Cl s::
z z L!J z -z ll1 L!J a:
Ct:
ct: ;::a as*, t-Cl Cl U1 m >-
a*,
n**
~ ~
15d NI 553H.l5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 24 of 25 FIGURE 2 . 5 . 4-1
U1 a..
ISi ISi ISi ISi ISi ISi
,s.. ,
lD ll1 N
I II N
I- aa*a ll1 N V I-
- c U1 at.*a I- a:
CL. .J w t.iJ t-0 z Li.. L.J C 19*1 V lD a::
U1 L.J CL.
l :::J
.J a..
- J z 0 15"1 C
C %:
z z U1 l!J - a:
-a:z L!l z
- J lh*r a::
t-Ln Cl C tll >-
at**
n*a
= ~
=
=
Ill Pl
~
Ill
=
N -
Ill N
Ill
=
=
=
~
15d NI 553~15
~
et -
l!l l!l COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY .~NALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 25 of 25 FIGURE 2
- 5 * -1
ci u
z ,(
[!)1/1 N.
I- ::J
!!!z o-w~
z*
.._, l Cl
- i w
KOLO$,...
Samples Saturated With 200 PSI Back Pressure Saturated, Undrained Test CLAYSTONE s:::.
(.>
rm MOHR STRESS DIAGRAM
-C:
G) 0
- , H=f EI a
(/)
'CD
'0 C
- , V 0
/
a.. - -
J I
.,. /
- I I i
(/)
' I' CJ) w a:
- ~
r l/
2 30°
.... l JI I tffi ......
.... I-t- I I I c,, ,._ \
ti) 16° f, I/ V I
[..-
....... ... t I
I I,, ~
1---
I' ,, I ijI I l\
=
rs. '
~,~....
Cf
~
r..
V " 2~ 4 -' 6 I I&
, COMANCHE PEAK S.ES.
30 psi \ ' \
5--
i 1l 3 I I
I I FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 1
100 200 300 400 UNITS 1 and 2 500 600 MOHR DEA.GRAMS STRESS - Pounds /Square Inch CIAYSTONE SAMPIBS FIGURE 2.5.4-3 IHOH:UI
rt£ . . _J '-* ' r I I
...1 I
--*-* **-**** -* - --~1-* :
+-*-*- i L ' I t- I .I-
' : i
+ I t*
I
--r-: ._... .. t*: .. ***-- -+-- *---- r*- **-
-~-'" :
i i I
I H~ r-
! : I I :p I
- -t ,
- L. .L.l t - -- '*- i- "**
- 1 t- - ... -
i i
+-
I i i I
+ I ft_
i i i I i ..I J i""/
m#
I
'-->- 4000 *r i
~-*--
f I : i I
t-+- - "[1----1--' /
- £+*
I I I
---**-* t- - : i :
I
- -l- I ...
! I II :[
+-'
I :i I ti*
C- *.*.
1 i I I
+
I -i--
' \ I 7" I : I
-7 ',--l-i I I I i I I I r I
- YI I I I I t
/+tl' I
-; 'I '
I I
I I i +: . r : /
I
- =*-'_ i-t i L+--
l .;. r-* L I I
I I I I ;
' I -
._ __ >-+
i ' :
I I I
I .
I , __
+- Z.1 ...... !/ - -- ~t-
- l ,_
I - -~-- - .. *- ' l ..
t/ -ij -r1 ' i--
I
~-+-- , _._
I
-+t_ : :
-- t*: *- ****- /t-:/1 ->-+ ,_ I
--* f...-,_
3000 + ****,- ~,*- I 1 I ./
I I
I I '
L
- ' I I
+r -++-+ - -+*
' ' +-:-+! -l-t
~****~ww}
lI -1 l,-* !l 4+-
I
,I
- - j
}
l
/j_
' I I.
--f -
i
-- *t 7 - I
-- --U "'t_j_,_ ---1!
I r- ,;
I I
t +r +-) - it t- ~~= I j I
'Ee,--
I , __ f- --- t* -** ! ,_ l-f I I I
'---rL: I I : I I I
.f
/1
~j-
rI i ;
-L+-L -1
-~--+-t-H
-1 ... ,..*
I t --~- 1+ '
l..
I
-1 V I...
¥, -
-+-
' +
I
- I
-+- *+-
~-
-- (/) j- 1, l I 7 !~
-- P.. .
-- z .. L .1 i
- I i
' I i I
I
~- ~ -
r-
,_ H 2000 I
==:.. + I I
I I
I i,
I/ I I I
I I H (/)
(/)
t+-i-+ :
I i j I .J
-r-- I I I i
I I
i
-j µ.:J p::: r~Jl ' I I i J 1' I i I L-
-L~H--
- ztit+
I I I i/
8 i I
I .; i :
(fJ , __
~--.-,,,,,,.,.,. I I
I I
- I I I I' ~
,, r1 I I i
I L_. I '
I I
~ '
l
. +--.. ,-
f--
! I
i
-1, J I
~: (
.-- - -*-::- I I
.. 'I: I I
,.. I ,. "---
1 I I ! "j I r I :
,__L - . .;..
~-H-ffl I !
I I
l' r 111 I
I
, ...... ... l ... t I . l I
' -++- I+
r ,+ -
' j ,1 I ' !
- -H- ->-
i '
- + Boring No. 9 1000 I j/j Depth
- 32.6'-33.5'
-+ *- LIMESTONE, VERY HARD I
i *t .iffl: -- +
I f '/'/
--~
rt1 =~l I
r *--'-* 11 '
l COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
_, t FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
+1 f--
1-, *r+-~t
- I t-
-I-
/
UNITS 1 and 2
--t - -
- tI *f- :
ff
,i'f, 'I STRESS vs. "VERTICAL STRAIN
-+ -+7-t I 1*,
I ._..i t ,I ,
J'
-ff
'/
-+--+-+ ++*-'
T r
USING SR-4 STRAIN GAGES T! I l ,
I FIGURE 2.5.4-4
+o !
I/ I /i I i l"
I
' I
. 04 -
c-*+--t
- 06 .08 .10
-W- -.02
- 0 I I
.02 I I I
t
'T I I I .L I "'TTT: ! l I I I I I
I I i
-+ i
- --tt--r I
- STRAIN IN PERCENT--
I
- I I
I t -- --*
-r I
I I I I
I
- -- - I l T I I
i I I
1 Trw-
- 1 I I I I I
Boring No. P-9 Depth=32.6'-33.5' LIMESTONE VERY HARD COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS VS. LATERAL STRAIN USING SR-4 STRAIN GAGES
l i; l
~ ~
ti L *t~
- _
- __ 1- f l~* :
f ,
-: ~ ]
j -*'
~
~. '1' t
! +
--:-r_-:- . l '
- t - .._
I ---i..--.-'-+---+---+->----+--+--+-+-,-.-+---i.-:_...__
+-+
7"*+ .
,- t --t
~-_:_.'. ,-L *---'- ,~- '
-t**+ .--t ----;.- ~- * !-t-L-r _,._i-~~*+-+-,
Boring Noo P-9 Depth: 60o0'-62.,7' CLAYS TONE
+--i-
.:_;* -,--,-- COMAl\lCHE PEAK S.E.S .
_; .j} ~--:*-*-
-t---:-
t-4-+-
FiNl\L SAFETY Af\lA.LYSIS REPORT
- + *i-. --r~ +-*
. : ~ t-+ ~ - UNiTS 1 ~,1'd 2 r _; l-+---r-
+ ~ '--ti-+ STRESS vs VERTICAL S'J.'};,,>,IN
~J~
C USING SR*-4 STRA.IN :::.~ACES 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ - - *-
4 __ , ..4 .*..., +-;-+-*+, **++ t
, *. 1 . ..L..L..LJ__L.C-L..-)...._;..-L-.l.-i.....l....i...J...L.L.J.j_l.-
Boring No. P-9 Depth: 60.9'-62.7' CLAYSTONE COMANCHE PE AK S. S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 VS. IATERAL STRAIN
/ USING SR-4 STRZUN GAGES FIGURE 2.5.4-7
- ,i.--.
+f
-+- I +-- ++-f-+-+-l--+-+-+-l-+--+---<-+--+-l--+-i-+-l---+--+-+-+--+--1..+-i-+-+-L....L....l......L...:I
. ..._;_+_._ .........,__.__,_ 1-- L-.. --+--
I
+
-+-,-+-+--f-+-+-, -+--+--+ ,-+-+-,
-r t ~---r- --+ - I +-l-+-+--4-1--+-+-+-+ - - - -
rt - --+-+--+--+-+-+--+-+-+--+-+--,
.i_ __ .___ -
1-+--+-+-+-++. I- .__ I- -+*-+---'-+-+-+--+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+--+-if-+-+-1--+-+--+-+-+-+--+-+-l-l--,__.j_._. j ...........-+--..-+--+--... - ._
...L 8000
--+-1--+--+->--1--i-+-l-+--+---<-+--+-1--+-i-+-l---+--+-+-+--+--1--+-i-+-+-L-+--->-L-i--~1- +-+--+-+-H-+-+-i~-,--+--....+-+-+-+-+~- >-..-+-+-+
I I
I
--t
+-+-+-+-l--+-f-+-+--1--+-i-+-+*-+---+---<-+--+-->-+-+-+-l---+--+-+-+--+--1--+-+--+-l-'--'--'---'- .L...L..L..L.+-+
I l lo-- ~-- ,1. **** ~.I- ~~-- *--- --+-1--+-+-+I *---; f-- ~- - --- t--1-rf-- - l-I I_,$
I 7000 i I I I I
I I I I
--+--+---~-+-+--+-+-+-+-+--1--+--+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+--+--1---l-+-'-+....-+-+--+-*
-+--+-1-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+--+-+-+--+-+-+--4 -+-,-+**+-+--+-+--f .1-
---41-+-+-+--+--li'I/'-+--+-+--+-+---+-+-+--+-+--+- t- ~
r H-H- I
+--+-+-+--1-.--+--1--+--+-l--+---+--+-l-+--+-if-+-+--l--+-i-+-l-+--'---'--'--'--+-+-'-.L.-'-
I t-- ,- *- -
f-+-1--+..-i.-+-+--+-+--+-1*-+---1-+-+--+-+--+-+-4--++-4
~ ~ _._......,.J_..j_..j. __.__. H-+--+--+---+--+-
I I
_._ I Tf-
~
I I
-t f--+-+-+--+--+-+-+--+-+---++-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-t-+--<-f--+-+-+--+-+- +--l -l-+-A--+- +--l---l--+-l-i--t--1--+-+--+--+-+-+-1--+--+--t--1 I
6000 T +--+-+--+-->-+-+--+--+--+--+....-+--+-<-+--+--l--+--+--+-l-+-+-+-+--+--L+-J._(_j_ __ l+-4f--+-+-+-+-+-+4-+-+--f--+-i-*f--+--+-+-l-+--+-,
j__*
,:=:::~. .
I I I I ) I
>-+-+-+-+-+--+s1_o._o.._.o_._ __....\-_,;.....
t-+-+-f-+-+ -
___~:=::*===t-
-l~-:. .
,_-+-1---++-:-..+.... +....
'--:-_:',: : : : : : : : : : + :-l:_4',..1
/ :o 1
- ~-::_.L.---;_-+~-=-~'~.:+.--.:~:--++-~-+,_++-~-
- - 7---t"-+-+-i-+,+---1--++--+-+-++-i
+**-+-+-++-+~--+.~-+----::::::
--- H
. - -- ~--** ++--1/4 ,-+---.--+--+-+-:-+-*-+1-+-+-4-+-+-..-l---+--+-+-+-+--+---f-+-+--+--+-+--+-+,--+-(~7t-l-- ~-- ~-1--t ~;--r H. - * -+--+-t-+-
--*-+-- Cf) ct-+--*f-w+.-j,-+--+--f--+-+--+-+1-+ -+-+,-+--+-i-+--+---1---+-+--+--+--+-+-+-+-+-l--+-+--+-t -41/-A--++-+ --'- i '-t-t--+-+-l--t-+-1--++--+-+-++-i-+t- ~~-
__ : ~ - ___ , -i -+--+-+-*-1--+--+-,*-+--.--+--<---l---l-l--+-+--+--+-+-+-+-+--+-*-+-<- - -
->--->--- Z H-t--+-t-t--+-,--+-+--+--+-+-t--+-++-i-++-r+-+-t--+-+-+--t-+--+-,--++-hA--1 1/iy-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-1--+-+-....+-+-+-+-++-1-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-l
- H ~ -* - - ~ _ _j__ --+--.+- - +-+-1--+--+-1-+-+--+--+-+-+-1--+-+-.-+--,--+--+-t---hl'-+-+-c.-+--+-1---+-+-+-+--+-+-,-+--+--1---+-+--+-+--+-+-,1--+-+ i-+-+-1---+-+.-+,-j
--~- +--+-+--*,- - i - -l- +--+'-+--+-+-+-+--+-t .+-i---j--j-+--+-+-+--+-+-+-,i--,l,.-4-.4-I ~
+ - L- -
=:== i2 I I 4 00 0 f-+-<--+- *, -+--<--+---,__._+,--! - 0
/ I .L-I
->---, li::i I I ~-++-,,--+-+-+--t--+-+-+-+--+-l--++-1--++-+-+-+-+--t-H<\---i-+-+-l-+-+-+-+-i-+-l-+-+-l-+-+-+---!-++-<H---+-l-+-+-+---!-+-+--<H--+-l I
->----, o::; +-+,-l-+-+-1--+-l--+-+,--+--+-+--+--+---+-+--+-+--+-+*-++*+**+-+-J- 7*-- I
--1--4-+--+-l--+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+--t--+-+-t*-+ - * - -
-i E-,i t-+*-+-+-t-l-+-1--t-*+--r-+-+-t-+--+-+-+-++---+--+-+--+-+-+-+-+--Y-l--t--t--f--+-+--+--+--,,-+....--+-+--l--+-+-+-+-+-+-,-+--+---1--+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+--+---+-+-l U) - ;__+- - -~-- - L - -+--1--l* -.+ *l--11---+--+--+-+-+--+-+-+-+-4--+- -+-+A-+-+-i--+-+--H*-+* : r +-++ ,-+-+--~ +-l-+-+-+-+1-*+*-+--l +-+-l,..++-l-+-l-+--1-1 1
t G I
/, i
>-+--+-t--+--+-t--+--+--ll--l---l---l--+-l-+--+--+--'--l--l---l---f--+-+-+-+-+--+-+--+--++1-0+--+-+--+-i--+-+---l-l-+-+--+--l-+-l-+-t-+--t--+-1---+-+--+-+ 1-+--f--j--+-+-+--+-+--+-+-+-+-j I-+-+ --+-+--+-+ -+ *+ *l-* *--+-+-+-t- l ** -f** -+--1--+-+--l--+-+--t- - f.- 1-- - - / ~- ,.;:.. +~-*, -- -- - ~*+-+-+-+-+-+-+-*-+ -l--+-- +-l--+--+-f-+-+,-+-+-1--++-i---+-+- __ *-** *-.,_ ,_
-+-+--+--+-+---+-+--1--+-+-+-+--+--+-if-+-+-+-
1-+- 3 0 Q O+---<--+--+-t-+-+-~--'>-+-+-+--+--+--+-+-++-h4--t--+-+-+-+-+ -+--r-+-+-1--+-1--+-+-1--+-+ *+-+-++-1-+-+-+--+-+--+-+-+-+-I--+-+-- , - - - -
1 1
>-+--+->---+-
I I/
I '
I I I !
- I I !
I/
I Boring No. P-10
-+-
Depth: 80'-81. 3' LIMESTONE WITH VERY MINOR I
I J QUANTITY OF CLAYSTONE ll'i I
I :/
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
i d FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
~*~ ->--+- l OOO ........-+--'+-+-+-+I/-.4-+-+--+-+---+-+--+-+-+-+
i UNITS 1 and 2 1-+--+-+--+-t--+--+--+-+....--+*-+*+* +,,I-++ *+--1--+-1--1---+-+-+-1-- L-H-t-+--t--t-+-,--t--t-iH-+-+/--D,::V-H+, S'I'RESS VS. VERI'ICAL STRAIN USING SR-4 STRAIN GAGES 1-+-+-+-+-t -+--+ ~ t
...-+-+-+--+--+****+--'-"*--1--,1-1-Y+--+....-+-+---.--+*+-*+--+--+--+--1-+-+-f--+
11 FIGURE 2. S. 4-8
+--+-+-+--+--+--++o '" .~~~~-~~--~-er ,~""!"'---*,*.---------~,--,111'!""'!"'"!'1"!'~--~
1-+--+-+-,--+-t--f--+-jf O +--+--+-+-+--+-+-+
ST RA I N I N PE RC ENT -:-4-+--+---+--+-4-+--+---1----1--+-+-+--1----1--+-+-+--+f--+-+
+--+-+--+-+-+-*+....--+--+-t-+-+--+-+-+-~-+--t--11--t---t--+--+-+-+-t-+-+-;1-+-+-1-+-+--+-+-+-~--+--+--r-t- ++-+-+-+r-++-1~+--H--l-+-+-+-+--+-+--H--+-+--l
+--+-+--+-+--+-+---+--+-+---1---+-+--+--+-+-+-+-+-+....f--+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+-+-1-+-+-1---+-+--+-+-+-..L-j-+--+---+-+-+--+-+,-+-+7-+-+-+-+--+-if-+-+---l--+-l-+--+-+--+-il-+-+-~-1--
l
~-+-+-+-+- +-+-jl--+-+-~+-+-+-+-++-+-++-r++-+-+-+-+-+-++-il--+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+--+-l~+-H--l-+-+1-++1-+--+-+-++-11--++-l---i + -+-+-+-+-+-+--+-.........
~-~- H-tJ~ r-t ! !
I I l I
I 1 fr
)
- -- +-
t- l -
~t-+ e-I i l
I
"-1-------r--
~tI
-+--+--+---t-t-+-+-+--+-+-+-;-t--f-t--+-+-++ -+-+ ++-+--+-+-i-+ -,+-+---+-,f--4-+-t- ' - __ ._,
--+--+-+--+--+---i-+---+---t-+-+--+--+--+--t----1--+--+---+--4--+--+--+-+---+-,f-+-+-+-+--+-t---+---t-i--+-+11-+-..__.-.__._,~
--+--+--4-+-+-l-t---t-f-+--+--+--+-+-+-+--+-+- -)-+* +-+--+-+ --+---+ -+-t -+->-+--+--I- +- + -*--+-----i i *- ' *
--+--+--4--t--+-l-t---t-t-+-+-+-+-+-+-i-t---t-;--+*++++i-+-f--f-l-+i~_f--+-+-+-J-f--f--f-+--t-++----i--
! I I I
-~+-+-+-+-1-+--+--i-+-+-+-+-+-+-1-t---t-;--+-+-"-+-t-- --+-+-1-+-+-+-+-t-+-s--+-+-1-+-+ 1 +--+--+--,~-~
+-+-t-1-+---+-+-+-*-++-+-+-+-+-+-+ +--+-+ + t- l
+-+-+--+--1-+---+-+-+-+-+-+-l-+-l--+---+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+*-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+--+---+--+-+-+--+-+->f-+-+--t-+-+--4
-+--;--+--t-+-1---r-t r- - -t--t---<-+-- -t-t--
+_tt+- 1*-~-u--+-+--<-+-1 1--+-+-+-l-++-,t-+-+--1--+-+--+--l-+--+-l--+-+-t-+--+--+--+--+-+-l-+-+-lt-+-+-+-+-+--+-l--t---t-ir+--f--
1--+-+-+-<-++--+-~1-+--+--+-+-+-+-+-+--+-1---+-+-t--+-+-+-1---+-+e---+--+-t--+--+--+-+---t-l-t---<-+--+--+-+--, . .,.,.
1 :
I
-i- _j_
--+ ++ f- ~->--r-tt * - ~tt+-_,___,__,__
,-f-+-i----- -
I ' I
+
i
-t t _
l- -1 I . -
I
-+-~i -
_._._,,__,_--+--.__._-+--+--+
t--+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+-+-+--1
~~~ ~+- --+--+--<-+ --+---+--+-+- +--+-4--+--+--<e--t--
- r-+-t--+-~
- --+-+-+-l--t--+e---+--+-+--+--t--+---t---t--~r-!--~-
- -t-+-
+
-l-
+ +--,i--t---+--,-+-r
! I I
-i--+-1---
1 f--l--+-+-t-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+-+l--+-+-1,--+--+--t-+--+--+-+-+-+--l-t--+'-1-+-l'--+-+ - +- -t- r- -1--l- '--7-t- l-+--+---1--+--+-,---+-+-+--+---+-l l-+--++-+--+6000 t : -t---~
t1:tt1~L-Il-rL,ll~~itt1:tl~~-tt~~Lt--,t
-r--~-
1 1l~w-~tJJ1Jj~JJjlJj~JJj~~j~_tJ,~tJtwtw~U~~~~a=--~i-ii-l~P=~
...... 1---1---.
-~-~- - t-+-*--+-+- *-
"-i-- - j t - +-- .
- -H-** --+- :-
,,--t-rl-~ -
-t +- f--i-I
-+-+-+-+-+-+:-+---+--<,-++--, +-+-----!-*+1-+--+*--+-+--.--+-t--+-~-+-+,-.-
-+-,--+- ,--i-t-+,-.--+---++ ,~ -~+-L-i I
-+-+-+-+-+--+ +-"--+-+--t---t--+--t-*---t---+--<c-+--+--+--+-t--+--.-.-,-r-1--,---.---,---+-
-+-+--+--t-1,-+-t--+--f-+--+-t- :;;-...--T -
t--
+-t-i i ,_,_
-*j,,...,-'-+-....-~,"'+-+-+-l l--l--
i
-t-+_._*+-+---+--+1-+--+,--+-~--+-'
- -i--L-. +-- ~~~
1----i--l-+l+-+--+--+-1/4---+-+-+-iH---+-l-+~-+-+-+-+-l--t+-r- COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S_
,_ -t-1-+-+-1--+**-~
-t -L - -- - -+---i--1-*---+---,*--+
2 0 OO -_,_ t
---<1-+-_._.._._....,._
-,ltJ_,-+ -i -t--+-+-+-l--1-+
".+
__.._._ _,_,-+-_ ___
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
._.__.._..__._ ,r- I H-+--1-+..,l,H---+-+ -+-+---+H--+-+--+--!.- UNITS 1 and 2
-- -~ - -- i- '- f-h-i--..1'*--**-+-+ -t--t- --~- -+--'1--1--+-+-,-+-+-,-+-+--+-+--+--'
STRESS VS. IATERAL STRAIN USING SR-4 STRAIN GAGES FIGURE 2.5.4-9 I
I I
I
' I I
I I I
--r-
+- ' I
+- 1--+ I l++ + : + +
i I--.__+,--.--+-_+,__+ - ,__ ~+- - +- ._,__ i I
_.__._-+--._.._-+-I--+--+_,:~+--+-+---+-+-- ---*- - --*---+-+--+-+-1-++-+-+-+-+-t-1~ i--~~ *-
1-+-+-+ +--+ -,-*--4--,1rr7-
'- ,__ - + ~-._ Q
--1--~-- +-+1* -I *1 I
--f--i-t-+-+--+-+-+-+--+-+- . . -r-
--n--+--+-,!t-+-+-+-+-+--+-+--+-+-1e-+-t--+-+-+--+--+-+--+-1-+---t-+-+--+--+
-r -'"-- -*t--
--t--t
~---~-r----*- -1*-t--"-_,___,_~_,_~__.
,i
- +-.___1,.,,_1.--
I
""-~+.................++++-+-!-+-f
~fl..4...-!-l--!-4-H-4-1-1-+++++-+-H-+-t++++++-+---1-1-..+++++-H-+-t-+--+-++
+t-+_+t_ o _
-_ -+*.*_- +~I--++-+-+-+-
t
- o2sI t-+--+-+--t--t- . oI so:::=:=:=:::=
l I ____ ,_ J J 1 l _
.01s Hf ,
'l+f.100 I I
-+--+--++""+
f-+-,11-+-+-+--t-+-+-!-+
~*- .12s 1 +-1-+-f
=._.: .1so
'-+-Hf-+-f-1--
'-'+-~--*-+- t - -+->-+-+-+-r+-+---+--+*+-+--.. *+---*-r- ---,- STRAIN IN PERCENT, ++-+--t--i'-+-+-+-+++-+-t-+--+-,r-+-t--ti-1
~~ ~ --t- .' +-*t, -
- +*--H-1-+l - f- -+
1 r 1 1 1 r--t-, "~ 1-_~J~t::!=t1~~-tj=t1~~t 1::!=.+-1-_+_....;_,f-+_i--+L--H.__
- I- - H- j I---+ - 1
-+- -W---i-+-1, --l-+-H-+--1--+-+-+-1--+-+-H-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-I-+-+-+-+
0 l
[-+-+-+--+-+-f-+-+-t-+-+-+-!i-+-t-i-++-H--1 J
.......~~-1. :
]+t1
+ -+1-+-+-+-+--++-+-+I+--+--+-,!-+--+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+-i-+--+-+-+-+--+--+---1-i: -+--+---t---l-i'--+---l 1
1-+-+-lf-++-t-+-+-+-+-+--Hl'-++-t-++-t-+--i 1
, i
- I-
.. _I
+-t- ~-
I
-t*
,_,___ ,n(
i' 1-1 t t it *--
>--L-t- ~ t- t- t-I/
~t1. ~tr-'--l l
I ,__
L ...
- -- - -t ; !--
11 t -i~~- u*--
i/
- -++ '
I I
1--t- ~ t _,_ - I/
-t r} . .
t I--*-. +- -j--
l.. 4 '+ -
- J I
- t---t+
-- - - -t- -- 200 - -- - +-
ri r ~ -t- ,-- +-t r - +--*-
'l:i= ,
+
I - e--l-- +-- - - - ~ -
--+r r i f-- I I I 1/ l-
. t~-jL-tr~+- _J_t~ +-y v:-+ ~l+--tl - ,- 1-*-t--
I - -t I
I I
1 I I
t- +-' --
'~ttt-- t +-+-- *-._--+-... L-I-
L rf-.... -+ - I I -t-I Vt- dt L !- tt-*-+-
1
,--l l
'-->- --~ ,:
I.__ - .........
I c:I 175 I !
-+-
I l 1- - r 1 , 1 ;-+'
L-Sample m*Htl I
' ' ' i ' ' I/
-,__i_ --L- L > - If-µ Started I
I I -t I
I
! - 1-l--,:__
-t -
t-++/-m*- ++-
- --i-Tt- -- - l 1--
I/
I -!->-Yielding Plastically
-- - --+
I I
I I + ,_ --L-t-7 t-~ _,_
- Tj ;lt
.1.
-41 ' -rl-------------+
I I
' -r---i-;...-t -+- ,.j, r--
+-rt-t--... -+,..-t l-,
-->--1----.,___ __
I ! - 7'
,150 '
I i~
' : -t :
~---L-- --~--
t--f-+
---r- -+ -r I
I I
t--
I I
--+- ..
-r ,_--J...j...
)_ l--1--
l i
--1--
-*-- l ,____
'1 I
+-*
I I
i 1 ~-tr:~ "~
I I
-~~-Lt f+
'""-!-1--L--
+ -
t- L_ --
~tt 1--J--l-.l--t
.. -+~ --l--
-r!
I I
+-t+ -- - - t--f--
I
.__,_ - -l-- -+- ,-.+-t* ___ , __ ,_
+
I -*--
'-~1 t+ --- *-'t- ..
+- + -
I - * - + - t--4
,- I __ .,___ --
I- 125 I I I I
- ++ if --l _J__ I I I
-t-I
-f+-* ;~r -t-+-_,_
- l- ! ' ! j ; !
' 1 +- -- -
d: f- 1-f I I
- t .....
I-t---1---
>-t t--1-- . 0- I -
-- t - -
I 1
f .
}f+/-r l 1 _,_
--- -H ,__ -t1--- ! -
- - >---P-l -t
_,_ -z c-C/}
- 100 I I I
I
-~--T-
,J
/~ C. w
~--
-T
- -+-
I I-I I
_,_ - U)
-H i l I I /
I/
I I l ..'; .. ---+- -+- -t I
I l
I
_,_ -Cf} += I IJ --+ t I
I
,__ -1'.:4
-o::; I ! : j I
'I I
~-t I
t+ . .
I !
1--C- -
I 0 '
- E-1
-Cf}
I 75 I
~
I I/
I
'/
-,-t7"-
t+-t-1 -+- i I
I _,___
Bi -- ~t-I
!-'- --l-- L-+--,l......._ ' '--*
I
+r I II D !
-- ---~--
.L l
I
--+
I I
I/
I/
,!/ ~
-l --
I I i
I I ! I !
I/ I/
-+- ...... ,
I/ 11 I/
Boring No. P-11
+- 50 -
I h' Depth: 73.0'-75.0'
' I/ I/ CLAYS TONE
*t*
I I/
],< I 1/Z.
I/
1/1, I/ J COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
- I/ II
.... t-t-25
,_+ __ ,_ - ,_,... v f
'I ' FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I
I
!-,(
'J' I
'I UNITS 1 and 2 l/ I' I I/
I/
I,,
fl STRESS vs. VERTICAL STRAIN I/ I /I
-~- !/
}
1, V
I/
If I USING SR-4 STRAIN GAGES 0
'J' V
,,,, FIGURE 2.5.4-10 I.J l.-.1 I
0 .05 .10 I ; .15 c
.20 .25 I I I I I ' i I - - r-+-- -i-- I I I I I I I I I I I STRAIN IN PERCENT ...
I l l
I- - -
l- H
! I I I
Boring No. P-11 Depth: 73.0 1 -75.0' CLAY STONE COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS VS. IATERAL STRAIN USING SR-4 STRAIN GAGES FIGURE 2.5.4-11
I-+-+-+-+
- - *- fl~-- -+- - --
-+
l
+-
t
-1
- t ITTTT!--
I : I '. i t t t* +
- *- - - *+- *+- +**+- ++ +-'-***-
- +- - - ~
I-+-*+- +-+--1-- - -- f-+++-+-+-++~-1--+--+-+-i-++-+-+-+--++-l*-+-..+--+. J.- t t- : +-+-+-+-+*+--l-+-+-+--1--l-l--H--l----- - -
1--+-+-+-+-+ --J.--f-+-++-l-!-++-f-t--!-+-+-1*--l--+--l---t- *t* l--J.-+ *- '**.. I f j t t t . ~ ~- *-- ,~-
t-+-t-t-t--+-+-H-t-+-+-+-1-+-+-+--t-H-+-+-t-+-+-H-+-+-+-+-!-+++-~+-+-H-+-+-+-.--* ~ tt-H~-+-H-++-+-+-+-H-+-+--++-1-++-+-+-+-1 I
t-++-l--+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+-t-++-t1-+-+-+-H'-+-+--++-1-+-++-+-+-+-H-++--+-+-i-+--+--1-_
1-+-+--+-+++-~-+-+-+-+-+ ...* .. **
1-1--t-t--+-+-+-+-1-+-+-+..+-+--+-*+--i-1-+-++-1-+-+-+-+-l-+-+-+-+-+-+-H-+-+--+-I- ~ * ,- 1 jIi i I 1* 1
! r t I 1 j
- f [
...... ----* i *-* .
- --*- - * ~-+--i-+ ..+-+ +-+-l t, +-+--+,* t---+--+-+-+~1-l t-. 1 - i t- I
(~-r-* ::
~- ~+-- I+-+
l+-.+--i--f--+-1-+-+-+--+-..jl*-*'- ++-+--+-+-+-I t-++-t-+-+-+-H-+-++--t-H-++-+-+-+-H-++--++-i-++1-H-+-+--+-+-i-++--+-+-!-+-~-l--l-.itu'-: ~ -+-~ ~
1 I I* -- - -'-+-t- - -+-1-~
t-++-+-+-+-+-H-+-++-+-+-+-++-+-+-+-H-++--+-+-,H-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+-+--+--+-+--+-i- . 1-..+r , , ~
~ +-+-+-1-+- -- ~- - *- +- f- -+-+-+--+---1
..C..
1-1-+-t-+-+--+--t-t-+-+-+-+*-+-+-+--+-+~*
I
~t=t=!=;t:!=:t::t=:;:t::t=t=!=tt!=tj-_t-1--*t1~~t.t1-=1~t.t-:t"1~~t.t1j~t.t-:t"1~~--.1-..
+-+---+-1-+--'-*t+--+*-j i...1-**. . *.;...**.~,- *
- +' ..++
~
~~
-t t l+ ,
H--+- '
1
- r*t+. ~- -+---
- ' - .. - - ~
r+--+-+-+--t--l
/
I
!. - + . f-+
-- H-+ . H l t ~;--i- +-4 -+1/4:.. 1 / l-t-*l--+-t-+-t-+-1-+-t-+-t-+-l-+-.. J-+-~'--l--l I-+ -L*. -t - ~ - - -+-++--+-+-li--t--+-+-l-+--+-+-!--1--+-t--
+
-r--i--t-,--- -+1 .
1 t* -+ ..---r-i- .J .. -~ .. +1- h- -+
H ..
~ 40 00
(/)
.. _J__
I L--C-
' ---1---1----t--+-
-+-t- *'--4--+--+--+-+-t--+-f-~ t -L-+
' i '
.._......_1 r--~ ;..___.... ~~ -
--,..--.+--i---1--+-1--~-+--i- +-1..
t . +-+-
i
. -+--f-+-+-f--i-./-.+-+
i I I
-+- ++-1--l
+-,
-./---1--1-+-l---f-+--l-.+-+-I I
i ' '
I I
I i ..;_.f ,/
' /
2000 1-+-+-H-++-+-+-++-+-+-+--++~~Y+--+A-A-Boring l
No. P-11 I Depth : 81 . 3 ' - 8 2 '
i t-+-+-l-+*+-+-+ +--l--+--+-+--+-+-+--+-+-+-+--l-+--1,\/4--1--+-+-t I
I /
/
y LIMESTONE WITH CLAYSTONE INTERBEDDINGS
-*--~ **- ----------------- COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
V / :
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2
,_.__,__._ _,__..._._.. + _,.-4---1--+-+--+-- .. -r-.4 I I
/ I/ / I --r-'-t STRESS VS. VERTICAL STRAIN USThG SR-4 STRAIN GAGES FIGURE 2.5.4-12
COMANCHE PEAK S.ES.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS VS. I.A.TERAL STRAIN USING SR-4 STRAIN GAGES FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4-13 I I.
r .10*
- -+-'"*4--1-4 *
....,_1-....-1.-i.
0, :) ** t++c .075
+-+-+++++-++-,-+.t-H....+-1HSTRAIN
(
' \ ,,
\ '"
"' ......0
---~
230,000
'""'~
UNITS 1 &2 CLASS I
\ \
0+00 5+00 \ I 20+00
\ \
P-8*
UPHOLE SURVEY AND',
SEISMIC PROFILE 2 CROSSHOLE SURVEY p SERV~CE WATER DISCHARG~"',
CLASS I,,...___
SERVICE WATER INTAKE :-"7"+-----:;""-1--A'-...;..i CLASS I "
/
CR CIRCULATING WATER) 00
.'*. \ '" ., ---~-
- -VI SCHARGE 00 m
I 0 '\
N N
I
~;~~OOWN \NOME~ DAM
. N 228,000
\
100 2'00 n1 COMANCHE PEAK S. ES.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 NOTE: PLOT PLAN SEISMIC PROFILES AND UPHOLE SURVEY DATA ARE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS ILLUSTRATED ON FIGURES 2,5.4-15 THROUGH 2 FIGURE 2, 5, 4-14 Amendment 67 February 5, 1988
(
N SLOPE
. .-----?
T PLANT
. CCRUSHE~
STONES)*.*
NORTH .. . l------
N 9900.00 *...
--******r*-*-- * * * * - * - - - - - - - - - - - - - * * - - * * * * - .<:: ':: * - * - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - 1
?>
L-26f TURBINE
.___.......--* TOE OF :**
BUILDING SLOPE SLOPE
.\ i: 0 0
- ...: 0 0
.. " 0 N 9800.OJ .. : ::_ w I *.
CONCRETE PAD .*. >*
I I
0 0
0 0
0 Amendment 67 0
0 g February 5, 1988 (J)
(]) SCALE 0 w r w COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
0 20 40FEET FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
REFERENCE:
LEGEND UNITS 1 and 2 TEXAS UTIUTES GENERATING COMPANY, FIGURE 2.4 40, "PLOT PLAN, DRAINAGE DITCHES 8 _ 1 AO SOURCE BORING PLAN AND LOCATION OF LAYOUT", MODIFIED FOR: AMENDMENT 1, POST-CONSTRUCTION CROSSHOLE L-i ~ LISTENING BORING JUNE 15, 1978 SURVEY BORINGS FIGURE 2.5.4-14A
070 TIMF - iSlAr*.;Ci;. PLCJS-S .':,t10W ir,r;::,fH,l,H*C,t.,
COLLE 1tl} q;,:[, 1'11 5**Vi:* PC !IFS t,.*t,'JF .1 SfV;:-R l. UJ-'.'t,TsOf\S A._ONG A SEi'S\UC C6C l INF FOR ClAR1frCA"'flQN, 'WO :..[ Cl""
+ /r---APPIIRENT 5YM8(iL.(: .Jf,.-E ':;';,__ E'l y;_E:._:,._-_ -~D.-'t'f_ ,,~!.".'/,,,,~f*
rlc.,C_:~;::*,r/, '*It* '>Jni';.l'J ;;: l c'*.f-;,,_y b~*-.;*,
I . f"~!,\" Tf,i- _\:f'"T (, ,, fh:'.r,; ~~:,_ '- ,;tJ I+)
'----t-,-+-
12, 500 FT/SEC T:-\F SLl~SV~~A'.:"'.E SET ONS 'iH[lWN PR:Sf.\1 DIRECTION OUR t:VALUtl.TlON ,::F T,-,1:. MJST PH,.::Bt.BLf CHANGE I SUBS~ihFA::C ,:c~\[:, l"i')NS 8A-SED ur<'N (., JO,:
(SEF SITE MAP) !~Tf;F?F><ETATIO~; :)F f'l'fSOiH.Y 4VA.U.8c.-f DATA. SC\'lE VAR:/',TJ.:>i*.J$ F"WJM THfSE
(/J o.aa CONDITIONS M1J$.T fl[ EXPECTED 0
z ALL VELOCITIES SHQWN ARf t.DPARf.NT 0 COMPRESSIONAL WAVE VE:LOCl~!ES u
~ ,( 3,:
-- - - 030 8600 ' f TISEC-..
LW 2 \
,~,~--
\_8600 FT/SEC:
17'. l 0 i I o
- ic 0 .-o 1 i -I - 2700 I
[ __ , ___ : 2900 FT/S£C , 24GO fl/SEC--
.--' ______ l _____
I SP SP STATIONS 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 I 6+00 7+00 8+00 10+00! 11+00 12+00 13+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 NORTH I BORING P-9 BORING P-7 SOUTH I
.---:--==t~~,::-i=-+==-=-=-L~f-~£=-_it-~,;iEISM-1(=:P-l_R=EOFILE==---2--+/-;_r;br=ri*-~ 1 INTERSECTION WITH i 850 850 11 7
__;_.- 2 00 FT, sec :
f-w uJ
- 2.700 FT/SEC SURFACE 2:2Jl~~=j~========~~~3/4:::::~L=-:l_-=:::::
LL b?~, j z
0 I
li,COC FT /S[C
---7 ----"-- 1 I I
<! EC:C _J ______ ~
> 800 w I
_J uJ l-- -
I I 2,SCO FT JSFC __j___j
- 1-.~,~:-~------------' /-_- _- _ ._-_ [_~-~------~I_~ ~~
I I
j __,___.c_____.__ 11 _ _
_I 750 COMANCHE FINAL SAFL TY ANALYSIS REPorn UNITS 1 illlcf 2 PEAK S E.S
s*
I I
' 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 13+00 14+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 STATl0NS 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 12+00 15+00 I i WEST B0R!NG P-6 BORING P~!~ EAST I i i i i I L] I :'
i l
I i
I
. i ;
I i
I INTERSECTION
- SEISMIC I
WITH PROFILE I i
I
........... I,. ******** - -
1--1--1-=+
--~
I ,
I 1 - - - - ...
i I I
I' i '
I i
i i
I I I '
i' I I I I I
I '
I i I I I
i I 2700 ' ~T/SEC I I I i I
i 1
I 2700 I
f"JSEG ' l I.
I i
I I 1
.,-~,.---GROIJND SURFACF I
i I '
_L i '
j ;
j i I
---.-- -- i ,. I '
I ' '
I
?60C* fT/S;::-c I I l .. j I 4- 2I0() fT fSEC i
I' ' I I I I i I I '
1 1 II
! II, 80 FT/SEC ~ f IS!::.C
- ~.200 I" f; Sf.C 12 ,60 i'
- i i I I
I I I I i' I I I I COMANCHE PEAK S.ES FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 S[ISi'C PHCFlLL
.060 .060 040 10, 700 FT/ SEC
+------+--+~~~----+-----0---+-----
--+--0_/'I ___, 0/1 .030 o7T ~
+~
71
. 020 0
.010 .010 2200 FT/SEC STATIONS 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 10+45 WEST EAST BORING M-5 750 750
INTERSECTION WITH SEISMIC PROFILE 4 I I I I I I I I 1 2000 FT/ ~EC I I -- I - - - ~5000- - -FT-/SffC I - --=-=-=--=,,-'-_______
l __._l_____---1 725 z _ _ __,!-
0
~ ,----_.:..--
~ 700 l - - - - - - - - - ! - - - - - + - - - - + - - - - - + - - - - - + - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - + - - - - - t - - 700 w
_J 11,800 FT/ SEC 11,800 FT/SEC w
625 675 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SEISMIC PROFILE 3 FIGURE 2.5.4-17
.050 .---------~---~-------.-----r----~---~----r------.. .050
.040 fl)
~ .050 .050 0
(.)
w
(/)
.010 .010 1700 FT/ SEC o ~s=p:--_ ___.__ _ ___.__ _ _.,__ ____.__ _--"'-=!::---,..-,__ __.__ _ __.__ _ _.._----'lsf STATIONS t
5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 9+74 l
NORTH I RORING M*3 I. SOUTH BORING MO 775 775 I I 1-w w
INTERSECTION WITH SEISMIC PROFILE 3 I I
/GROUND I
SURFACE LL 750 I 750 z ', , .... l I I /
0
~
> 725
~....
1'~~~---~------~~~~-~~~-------- -
2000 j_
FT/SEC I 5000 I
FT / SEC I
I I 1
~
~ " 725 w
....I w 11,800 I
FT/SEC
- ~
700 I 700 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SEISMIC PROFILE 4 FIGURE 2,5,4-18
r----------------------------------------------------,,
TIME (SECONDS) 0 ,005 .010 .015 .020
...;.._---....;..,..---~....;;..;,
BOTTOM OF 10 l - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 CASING CLAYSTONE ZONE GRADES TO CLAYSTONE 20 - - - -
301----
40---- CLAYSTONE ZONE CLAYSTONE LENSES 50 CLAYSTONE ZONE 9600 FT/SEC CLAYSTONE ZONE
-t--
w w 60 w CLAYSTONE ZONE u
<I'.
lL a::: CLAYSTONE ZONE
(/) 70 Cl z
- )
0 0::
(!)
3:
0 80
..J w
(D I
t--
a..
w Cl 90 CLAYSTONE LENSES I 00 1 - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - + -
110 l - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - + - - 1 , - - - - - - - - - - - 4 0
120 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CLAYSTONE ZONE CLAYSTONE ZONE 140 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1
TIME (SECONDS) 0 .005 .010 .015 .020 10
~OTTOM OF CASING 20 ~
30
\
\~
40 1 I
I-w w 50
)
10,600 FT/SEC LL.
w
(.)
<(
LL.
0::
)
(/) 60 0
z 0 '
0::
<.!)
3: 70 0
_j w
fD
- r:
I-
- n. )
w 0 80 ,
90
\0 100 110 Tl z
l> (")
"Tl ci C ro 120 C "'C (/) ~
J:J C l> l>
117 ::J:
- E:o Tl z 0:, )::,~
o<
z- m o N
- 0 rr, ('"') -; ~I
(.J1
+:>
...... <a
- z rr, :s::
Ci) ,-c
(/) l> m
_. z N
I
- s:: 0~ Ill l> 7Jm 0 I ("")U'l :::::, ~
(.J1 ...... U') l>
a.. (/) ;;;,;::
-I....,.
-<o N (/)
- z :::0 <:n
)::,
m m
' 7J 0 (/)
- 0
TIME (SECONDS}
0 .010 .020 .030 .040 .oso 0 ----...----...-,---"T,-----.7-----,,
10 BOTTOM OF CASING i TRENCH
\
0 e Jaor1ng \ve,t1cal 20 Mj5 Face) 30 0
\
Vertical~
Face I- 5'-1 r- 11 I
~
l-5 -I 1
11 '-11
\ \
PLAN VIEW 1..1.!
1..1.!
IJ...
0 Vertical Face 40
\
1..1.!
u \'i£.\\=1\\\'=\\~\\<:§,\>,,2&@&.1
<t u..
\
c::
Ground V) Surface Q
2:
e TRENCH {CROSS SECTION) 0 0
c:: 50
\
u:,
3: TEST SETUP FOR PRODUCING HORIZONTALLY
\
0
..J 1..1.!
GENERATED WAVES QO
- i::
Q.
0 e 60 l \
1..1.!
C e
70 ..
Shear Wove
\..- Compressio!al \..- Velocity wave veloc1ty 4,200 Ft./Sec.
o 11,000 Ft./Sec. e 80 90 ..
\
0
\ e Amendment 67 100 .. February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 UPHOLE SHEAR WAVE SURVEY (PRIMACORD METHOD) BORING M-5 FIGURE 2, 5, 4-21
GAMMA RAY ISTIVITY (COUNTS/SECOND/INCH) (OHMS PER INCH) 0 40 80 120 160 200 0 100 200 300 400 500 50 I-w w
-z w
u
<(
LL 100 0:::
- =i VI 0
z
- =i 0
0:::
0 3
0 150
.....I
- r:
I-a..
uJ 0
200 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELECTRICAL AND GAMMA RAY LOGS BORING P-1O FIGURE 2. 5. 4-22
GAMMA RAY RESISTIVITY (COUNTS/SECOND/INCH) (OHMS PER INCH) 0 40 80 120 160 200 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 --,.-----,----.-----.----r----.
_r- Ii-
_;;.;1r,,.
I<:;;;;__
I-w w
L_._
50
_;)
o;:;::__
z 1c:._
w u
<(
.r--
-~
L_._
a:: 100
- )
(f) 0 z
- )
0 a::
0 3
0 150
..J w
0 200--------+---+----,f---
250__.__ __.__ _....__ ____.__ __.__ ___,
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELECTRICAL AND GAMMA RAY LOGS BORING DI-2 FIGURE 2. 5.4-23
GAMMA RAY RESISTIVITY (COUNTS/SECOND/INCH) ( OHMS PER INCH) 0 40 80 120 160 200 0 100 200 300 400 500
""r=>
z
~
Z"'
~
w
~~
L)
<( 100 Li..
0::
~
(j) 0 z ~;-
- > .'".i 0
0::
0 150 I
I-Q_
w 0
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELECTRICAL AND GAMMA RAY LOGS BORING DI-8A FIGURE 2.5.4-24
GAMMA RAY RES I IV I TY (COUNTS/SECOND/INCH) (OHMS PER INCH) 0 40 80 120 160 200 0 100 200 300 400 500 50 I-w w
LJ_
z w
L)
<( 100 LJ_
e:::
- .)
(f) 0 e:::
<..J 3 150 0
....I w
co I
I-0....
200 250_,__ ___.__ _...,___ _.__ ___.__ ___.
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELECTRICAL AND GAMMA RAY LOGS BORING DI-9 FIGURE 2. 5. 4-25
GAMMA RAY RESISTIVITY (COUNTS/SECOND/INCH) ( OHMS PER INCH) 0 46 80 120 160 200 0 100 200 300 400 500 50 I-w w
l.J..
z w
u
<(
l.J..
100 a:::
(/)
0 z
0 a:::
0 150 w
aJ I
I-0...
w 0
200 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELECTRICAL AND GAMMA RAY LOGS BORING M-1 FIGURE 2. 5. 4-26
798' I 749' 802' 805' I" 78d3" 794*11*
EJE]
806' 1*
aoa 794*7* 767'1*
754*7*
c.t.ncou 1 STIDCT'll'UL UCD'ILL 772' 7*
D SD.IJCTUIAL FOUJmATIOII UC.AVATIOlt f10349.0 191§9,0 SUVIa VATU Pin tu*CB.
(CA'RCORY I IA.aJ'IIJ.)
CJ cuss 1 ILl:CTUCA.L DUCT IA.NU
( CATl:COllY 1 IA.CD'ILL)
Amendment 67 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
February 5, 1988 FNAL SAFETY ANAL'Y'SIS fEflCl{T UNITS 1 and 2
~ ,o ICM.L PLY YU:V PLAJIT UCAYATIOJ 11'11'1'1
I- :c z
<[
..J a.
+.;;;
It:
0 z
\
llmi ~...__,
',, - ' -' - - ~/, /.,.,
- ~-
(:) /
A'lfFER ro 1/ FIG 2!i.4-27
-ffli
-~~
/ / *
/ REFER TO 1,,, FIG. 2.5.4-2
\
)'
~.=:.~/
~
fXTENSOMETER CUT OR FILL ELEVATION DRAWING TAKEN FROM Gl8BS a SCALE COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
100 0 I I 100 200 Fe.ET FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 CUT 8 FILL AMENDMENT 87 PLANT SITE DECEMBER 18, 1992 FIGURE 2 54-28
t- r 2
j' t2 D
§ l'c." 5r.l.~CTE.O ~t';,\e,1ANi WE.LL ~~OE.O LIMEe,TONE
~ z 0 M.A':J.\MUM. t>IZ.E. 4 11 UI (T"(P.)
TOP OF OOMPe1E.Ni IC..~K ,-~~~-=--
_a_.~_5_5'______2_G ~~LITI~~K~
TO tiE. VE:.t..lf lc:O E:>'f GjE.OL~151 IN F1f:.LO, N ~,000 \13,'j' SECTION A-A iTA'TION 0+00 TO ~TATtON i+50 NT.'$.
112 ~E.Lc.<JTcO J..e:.e1eTANT W~Ll ~~OE.O LIMf:.~iONE i.AA'l.l~tA ~IZ. 'i: 4-"
t-l ~)e,15.00 f?I. E. 10,7, \. '25 SECTION 8- B
~TAT ION 1 + 50 TC 51A.110N '2+1C N.1.S, COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PLAN UNIT 1 and 2 SERVICE WATER INTAKE CHANNEL
'OC,ALe.
f\t-, I I i CUT & FILL MARCH 31, 1980
"° 0 ZO 4Q <.O FE.E.T FIGURE 2.5.4 - 28A
COMANCHE FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
., , .
- r1 UNITS 1 and 2 CLASS I BACKFILL
- D MATERIAL QUARRIES FIGURE 2.54-29
TEXAS UTILITIES SERVICES, INC COMANCHE PEA~ STEAM ELECTRiC STATION TEXAS UT I LIT If S SERVICES, INC COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION TEXAS UTILITIES SERVICES, INC COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION MASON-JOHNSTON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC DALLAS, TEXAS MASON-JOHNSTON !I ASSOCIATES, INC DALLAS, TEXAS MASON-JOHNSTON a ASSOCIATES, INC DALLAS, TEXAS t,,,1 w
Q A,
15
- COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PLANT SITE GEOLOGIC SECTION 25+*30
ELEV. OEPTli .,..,-,co i:
FOAM- SEISMIC WAVE VELOOTY lFEETtsECONOl OEPTli ELEV.
GENERALIZED UTHOLOGY
- GEOPHYSICAL LOG FT.MS.l IFErn ATlON I IOAINQ l*\4 I IFEETI FT.MSL 2000 000 1000 1000 10000 12000 '4000 c:::::x:::-"-:=: LNUTONI INTtAIIEOOEO Wmi ~ -..: r.- ..;;::. ~r.:: *::. ..:-_, *
.....oo- .. Cl.ATSTC><< ~ --t t-- - - -
. .... _.... aoo-
-.** =*
- - _1,.
?
... 20 --~~- .i 6
'4 4
~ It.A 20 -
- -*-- ....-- Ct.AY'ITCNE l(T(IIIIEDOEO Wini ~ G 4 ' A /;.
- :;::::~..=- LMESTONE ...,
- 40 LMESTONE II'
.. 4-
& d~
.. . ~
40 -
~
j) Cl 4
- ~ :.:.-..:=-~...:. ~ .. -:.:..: ?- E
- ** *+-- :!J:..::::-::
6 ~
-*--=*-=r:-i=
---........~-
- ISO 60 -
- -:..::~. **¥:== ;=,-:.Ji~i g
4 j) /l
- ao :t
- 4 A . - ..
80 -
5u.
6 4 4 /l
... 100 - :<-:<-: Cl.AYSTOHE HnAIIEOOEO WITH lX Al /;.
100 -
>-700-,-
LIMESTONE 0 a:
- IWIIII
- 4 4 .:~ 4 O.z
' --700-z
- 120 LMESTONE
~
0
- 4 ~ 4 120-
- ) 4
- ~
.... \40 140 -
-
- 6
.... 160 160 -
- LMESTONE l'iTERBEOOEO WITH CI..AYSTONE
- 4
- 180
- ** A A
-600--
- 2 0 0 - - SANDSTONE
-220 NTEABEOOEO WITH CI..AYSTONE AHO LMESTOHE 6
I I
4' tu
.. _____ I-
~
- 4 4
-240 ------ ~ In i *-
4 4
>-2110
- A 260-A A ....~ ~ ~ ~ :.::. :t.~ =-::: ~~:;; .:..~ .... .-::-f.. ~ ~!- ; ~ :.?.:
... *-*--- z
- ~ ~ ;_::: *::= :;* ~]-~: :.i_i: ~t- .}:~t~: ~).: :::; .~ ;~
,... 280 3:
I-
- /l 4 280-
.... **
- r.:i --*=i 1!;_-=-* T"~ =*** :s=2~ ~~ t~~~~~~ ~:*:J:]i~::~: ~a~
- 4 ._ -- ..;:; ~ . -~.:J ~~ -z-4 ;.i:}:::;_ .-:rr~:~ ***:~ .
0 250 1 3 EXPU.NATDH GAMMA, API APPARENT, G/CC 3 13 0 12
- SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY October 14, 1988
.. CCMPRESSOHAL WAVE.
VELOCITY CAL.FER, IN. RESISTMTY, OHM NOTES: COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
11J SEISMIC WAVE VELOCITY PROFll:E IS FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT THE DATA PLOTTED IS THE AVERAGE VELOCITY. UNITS 1 and 2 I2J NO CORRECTIONS ARE APPLIED FOR REFRACTION PHENOMENA.
(3.) THE OBSERVED SCATTER IN P-WAVE VELOCtTY ABOVE 1115 FT. MAY BE DUE GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PROFILE TO REFRACTION PHENOMENA AS THIS ZONE CONTAINS SEVERAL THIN LAYERS AND SEISMIC WAVE VELOCITIES OF CLAY STONE.
( THIS F'IQ-US:U~ AC:>APTED P-R0"1 Re.I': 1~1) FIGURE 2.5.4-30A (SH 1 OF 2)
ELEV. DEPTH IAVCI i: GENERAUZEO l.ffiO.OGY F<:AM- SEISMIC WAVE VELOOTY IFEETtSECONOI DEPTH ELEV.
FiJ,CSL: tFEEll - - ATION GEOPHYSICAL LOG
- tooo 4000 1000 1000 lOOOO 12000 uooo I IORINQ S-V. I tFEEll tFTJ,,B.
S,ANOS?OC t(ftAIIEOOED WITH a.Ant0HE
-r:-:
360-380 ii1ti
- ::~::::::::
,... 400
-I Cl.AY STOl'E I II)
...I I -
...I~
~~
r 1-I
<:l: I
- ~ - 480-
- E
- I 4
soo-
-300- -
- --300 -
.,. 520*- - 520-0 250 t 3 EXPLANATX:)N GAMMA. API APPARENT, GICC 3 13 0 12
- SHEAR WAVE VELC:X::tTY CAL.PER, N. RE~TMTY, CHM October 14, 1988 CCMPRESSOW. WI.VE A
VELOOTY NOTES: COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
11.l SEISMIC WAVE VELOCITY PROFILE IS FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT THE DATA PLOTTED IS THE AVERAGE VELOCITY. UNITS 1 and 2 12.l NO CORRECTIONS ARE APPLIED FOR REFRACTION PHENOMENA.
13.l THE OBSERVED SCATTER IN P-WAVE VELOCITY ABOVE t 95 FT. MAY BE DUE GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PROFILE TO REFRACTION PHENOMENA AS THIS ZONE CONTAINS SEVERAL THIN LAYERS AND SEISMIC WAVE VELOCITIES OF CLAYSTONE.
FIGURE 2.5.4-30A (SH 2 OF 2)
VIEW LOOKING EAST 1 11
- * * * * * * * * ************ -810 0
...~... .. ...*......
....... ....... ... .. ... ..*. ~* ...... *..
- * * ***********************o******
- * * * * ****** 0 ***
- * ****** 0 ********* * ********
- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
- SERVICE WATER
- * * * ******************* 0 *****
- * * * * * * * * * * ****** 0 ******
- *
- t * * * *
- t O O t
- t t * *** * * * * *
- * * * * *
- 0
- o O ** *
- * * ** *** * * * ' * ** * * * * * *o o * * * * **
t **
INTAKE
- =
- =:=t=:=:=::=:=:=::::=:=:=:=:=:=:- -.:. *: .... : : ::- *:.-: :.-.~ \** :-: ::.*:.::::
-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-::-:-:r.. * * * * * * * * * * *********************
STRUCTURE
...... *.**:*****=:~~-***:*********
- =:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:::==:=::::::=:=:=:=:=:=t=:=:=:=_
. . ......... . -1ao' a*
LEGEND
- UMESTQl,E COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S .
-- CLAYSTONE FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- - UNITS 1 and 2 SERVICE WATER INTAKE CATEGORY I BACKFILL Amendment 67 CATEGORY I BACKFILL February 5, 1988 FG.R: 2
- 5
- 4- 31
I D PLANT GRADE 2' a* MINIMUM J_ ELEVATION VARIES VARIES SERVICE WATER PIPE TRENCH J J PLANT GRADE
.*; *:: ~:*.
...*.:~.
- ..*=*:
. .*.f'O"**.....
.....MIN.....*
- f'O" MJN 2'0~ r LEGEND o:
2' MINIMUM b... . ~MIH1 . * . l_ CATEGORY I 8ACk'.FILL *
- . ELEVATION VARIES CATEGORY I VARIES D. CATEGORY I 8EODING ELECTftlCAL DUCT BANK Amendment 95 February 2, 1998 COtilANDE P£Al U.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORl lNTS land 2
- TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS CAlEGORY :I BACKFILLED EXCAVATIONS I D -------=*~-----'------.::.*:._____ I
ELEVATION 805 .5 CONTAINMENT ELEVATION 793' 3"
\
REACTCR ELEVATION 768'11" N
_(_ s LEGEND (F COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S FRAC TUR£ FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FRACTURE MAP UNIT I FOUNDATION 10 FIGURE 2.54-330 Amendment 67 February 5, 1988
N s
REACTOR ELEVATION 768' ti"
/ CONTAINMENT ELEVATION 793' 3" TOE OF SLOPE ELEVATION 784' 7" LEGEND
\._p FR~CTURE IN~:CA TOR COMANCHE PEAK S E S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FRACTURE MAP UNIT I 10 FOUNDATION SCALE
!FTT1 F'Gl.'RE 2 5 4-33b Amendment 67 February 5, 1988
I
1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * - - - - - - - - - - -------- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -*
180" s
.F I
I i I I I l I LEGEND
~--~_-J1 CLAYSTONf
-*-- - **-- --***-* --==-**__-=-*:__*:__= -:_____ _:_*.::_:__-*:____*:_____:_-::-=-=-*-_:_**=-=-=-**-==--==--=====::::::j
---=-..::*_:_:_____:_-:_= m LIMESTONE 180 270° FRACTURE w INDICATOR COMANCHE PEAK S. ES FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FRACTURE MAP UNIT 10 REACTOR WALL SCALE (FEET) FIGURE 2.5.4-34
LEGEHD CUYSTONt teo* 270° s w LIMESTONE 0£NTAL C -
D BACKFILL I D ROCK REllKMII PER DESIIIII l f FRACTUII£ I-TOIi 210*
360° COMANCHE PEAK S.ES.
w N FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS FEPORT UNITS 1 and 2
.5 FRACTURE MAP UNIT 10 CONTAINMENT WAU.
SCALE FIGURE 2.5.4-35
!FEET]
UNIT I PHOTO GRIDS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 281 Zl I 26 I 25 I
24 23 I 22 I 21 I 20 I
19 I 18 I 17 16 I 15 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I i j I I I I I I I I I o* 90* 180° CONTAINMENT BUILDING I
!CBH-28}
I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I !
41 13 12 I II I
10 I 9 I 8 I
1 6 I 5 I 4 I ~ 2 I I I
28 I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I
1ao* 270° 360° CONTAINMENT BUILDING I (CBH-28)
I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6 1 !l 9 10 I II 12 13 14 1:, I 16 11 Ill 19 I 20 21 I 2 3 4 I I s I I I I i I I i I I I I I I I 5 I$! Lift I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I
,_ I I I
! I I
-, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I 14 13 12 II 10 9 8 7 I 6 5 4 I 3 2 I I I I I i I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I 2nd Lift I I I I I I I I I I I I o* 90° 1eo* 270"
' 3,so*
REACTOR CAVITY I
- st Lift (Cl-RC- l-21) 2nd Lift (Cl-RC- 1-14)
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PHOTO GRIO UNIT I CONTAINMENT ANO REACTOR WALLS FIGURE 2.5.4.- 36
CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-1 CONTAINMENT WALL
' PHOTO #CB-1-2 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO #CB-1-3 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 1 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4- 3 7
CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-4 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-5 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-6 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 2 of 21 REFERENCE FIGUR~ 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2. 5. 4-37
CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-7 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-8 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO#- CB-1-9 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 3 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4- 3 7
CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-10 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-11 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-12 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATI-ON PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 4 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2. 5. 4-37
CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-13 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-14 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-15 COMANCHE PEAK S.ES.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 E~CAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 5 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36
CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-16 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-17 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-18 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 6 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2 . 5
- 4 - 3 7
CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-19 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-20 CONTAINMENT WALL WALL# CB-1-21 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 7 of 21 REFERENC,E .FIGURE 2. 5. 4- 3 6 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4- 3 7
CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-22 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-23 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-24 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 8 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4- 37
CONTAINMENT WALL l PHOTO# CB-1-25 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-26 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-27 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 9 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGt)RE 2 *5
- 4- 37
CONTAINMENT WALL PHOT O# CB-1 -28 REACTOR WALL PHOT O# Cl-R C-1 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOT O# C1-R C-2 1st LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Shee t 10 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4 -36 FIGURE 2
- 5 . 4- 3 7
REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl- RC- 3 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl- RC- 4 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC- 5 1st LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 11 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2 . 5 . 4- 36 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4 - 3 7
REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-6 1st LIFT
- ~fer - ', ,. ~
1/4)
~ -
~ . ~--
-~-
,.:r~
REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-7
- .-.;;:::,, 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-8 1st LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 12 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2 . 5
- 4- 3 7
REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-9 1st LIFT
~ACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl- RC-lO 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl- RC-11 1st LIFT COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 13 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4- 3 7
REACTOR WALL PHOT O# Cl-RC -12 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOT O# Cl-RC -13 1st LIFT REACTOR i\f ALL PHOT O# Cl-Rc -14 1st LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 14 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4 -36 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4- 3 7
REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-15 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-16 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl- RC-17 1st LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 15 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4- 3 7
REACTOR WALL PHOT O# Cl-R C-l8 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOT O# Cl-R C-19 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl-R C-20 1st LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Shee t 16 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4 -36 FtGURE 2
- 5
- 4- 3 7
REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-21 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl-RC-.1 2nd LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-2 2nd LIFT COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2
.' 1, .
.~ :~--~~<*~:~1:,--
- . 1 '
EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 17 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4 - 3 7
REACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl-RC- 3 2nd LIFT
~*I
- ,.;..- -~
- ~ *'~
r.:~*-
r,r,*tlJ t !
, .. - *..," ,. * ~_ I'
- ,' I lr t-'.* 't ' ,' ..... ' \..._ ,, ...:- t.., "' .- "
- l .;Jf t .. -ti -:", . -,/_ .
"' 1* -~:i ~ . ¥'! 1- 1
- l . ~ - - ~ : - ;'" 'L,..~*....:--'<- ',I
~ i '.t-1...*"' ,. ' ' . . - ..f~,~ ~"';t:._. :;;.~ *:J .. -';, ~
1*- *"**;:;;:-i . ':",-.)0';- ., ,..*,,.~ :-,.,,* . _ __,,,.-;'41i** .,, .. ~1-~"'-1/2';~
~ -*~ ;.~
1~-;;~*~-~~1;**'2 ~;.flof.*: .; _;_ {-'~ : * .- *:..:_-t.*~*~:**,t.t~.:::::~~ ~ .~.- -<.*"J 0:-- ~~-~l/~!;.J1.
REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl- RC- 4 2nd LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-5 2nd LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S. E. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 18 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5 .4- 36 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4- 3 7
REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-6 2nd LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-7 2nd LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-8 2nd LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 19 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2 *5 * -
REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-9 2nd LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-1 0 2nd LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-1 1 2nd LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 20 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-3 6 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4- 37
REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-12 2nd LIFT
'~ REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-13 2nd LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl-RC-14 2nd LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1.and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 21 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4 - 3 7
810 802 799.5 810 WEST WALL r,o
~t:
U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 0
I0 20 ....
- c:
C!)
30 w 3:
40 >-
CD
- - er 50 l.iJ V,
n::
-=:I GO 0 0 I-70 z
w
(.)
a:
w 80 0..
90 100 0.002 o,oo
.,.,,.----------,-!*======:GR:,:t.v:E:L:======-------,----S;...A_N.;;...D--.---------1 COBBLES Cccrse Ftno I Cccr~o r.~Gd:um Fine SILT or CLAY I , L.----!----+--+-~-+---+------1------,---------:l L----*.1
- ~*~L,~-~-......___.__~~--i-------
-+ I
-: I '
I 0
- u ;
,__, :i
-~'! J lO
- .
- 1- !'
-I~-:-~-+- 20 !-
J , ,LL-. :t:
-*~Lf. 'l
- 30 C!)
W
--i--*--:1
- I 1 I
~
+--*l ,_ L.. ,. 40 >-
_l il m r
i-'
__;L__r-:!-- -JL . _ a:
$0 UJ
~ I . I I ~
~'. --:-l - I i I <t:
8
- ~}-*--1---r~ :r 60 1-
--,--~--T .r . . . -
\I \ . - 70 ~
~-c*,-*
--; \-+-~l iL.
I I
tJ 0:
w i \l .j T. 80 ll.
- -\, -
- --11J!t1 -,_j_
r-,;._ -nnn-
-r---,i*-,. I I 90
.,. " f 1! , I ,
-H- ._. ._L,.________ !CO 01 005 00~ 0.01 0.005 0.002 o.oo COBBLES
STANDARD SIEVE SIZES N,-~1 ;!1;1~1
~1
-- Q
- il' 6 ;; ;
- I6 10 16 ,() 100 200 3f," 24' :a" 12" a" 8 i 14 i 18 50 I 70 I 140 100 I 30° :21°! 15°: 10" I I I I I
I 5**
I . I
~
. I 1r,
-... ~ \, I ' I 0
. i ' ' 1:
"\. '\'JlI'., . ' .
. :'\ ~
I 90
,;I I
. -. I I0
- 1 I:'-. \ r *
- t-- --* *\ti:~ .--:}i
'I
- -+: '
I 80 I J ,- 20 1-1- . I ' ' ~I I
- t:
£2 70 . . I
- * '\' f !'\ ' l
- C:
~
tfff bJ ' !* ,- \ . ' ' 30 lJJ
~ . .
I I I
'~\-+~-* r I
I i
3:
., : -i--;* 40 >
i r ' I ' \ i \ I al 50 I
r- ..
' \ '*' i\ il 50 bJ a::
I
' .. \ i ! h I. ,--: '
. (I)
!t:
' <(
J I
i l i
. ..ii
- ' ! I t so 8
! ! !, ;-:, i '* \ \ I L i'
i 1-
. ' i \ \ \ I ffiu I
0 I 70 I.I.I I
\. \ I
- a. I. I r-, a::
.. *\
- ~
j\ I_ UJ ft-~-i-2 ' t - ~F ( ' \.' 80 a.
. \ '\
I
- ~ --,~f-I'\ r'-.. \ ;I I
\.
0 **
LL .
i '
. ~+-+-- -;-r ~ "- ~ rr 90
,.,,lJ'~ . I I
I, ..1..-* .l..... *
- I I I i'~ i 100 o.,.,..,r '!~1.0 ~.r.u *.:r.~fTFRS I I
'*'1000 100 '.jQ iO Go~i!\' 2 C.!l o.zs 01 0.05 0.02, 0.01 0.005 0.002 o. OOI GRAVEL I SAND SILT or CLAY COBBLES i Co~rse 1 Fine I Coars0 I M0dkim Fine JULY 27, 1978 AMENnMENT 2 Kme
- ** ,,,,, - ~- ,~,., ,,.~.,.,,.,._
Sp!3 No.
No. Depth ! Le;o:-id LL ?L Pf LS C!e:c:fc::1Ca:i II SUBJECT COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT l UNITS 1 and 2 i CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST PROGRAM SAMPLE .;i:2
__ ,_.;,..._. L_L___ . ., .. ~ --* --*~
- y_ C-33 FINE GRADATION AGGREGATE i
l ,~ ! i i I FIGURE 2. 5.4-388
- -,. j( ~. 'f' . *n*"'""*
~"""-'.'"' .** e* ~,
i
914
/62-610 0
(")
0 305 0 a:,
?.54 0 c.o r- 20.3 2 rr:
(/) 152 4 101,6 76 20 50.80
~
25 40
~
15 B8
-~
~5 C
6 .350
(/)
4 760 CJ)
--f 2,362 l>
'1,951 z I. 39 7 0
)>
1.168
_Q.;~ ::0 0
I
-~~ CJ)
I , ~
I
~1_7 (Tl
(/) !
C m _.Q:.?.t5 (Tl c.. .9 246 1'11 ..Q.3Q!!_
()
-I CJ)
_9,147, N
l Q.104 (Tl CJ)
~74 z
- t> n ro c_
C (J)~ r
)> )> -<
C z- ~ n ""Tl z N
--J
-i -< :c (J) )> rn c..o
--.J
_. z (X)
)> --0 DJ rn
- i ~ )>
- 0. (J) ;;x;: :::r:,,
3:
N (J) f77
- z
(/)
- 0 CJ m rn 3 rr1 7J z 0 (J)
-I
- 0
-i N
-I PERCFJ'-rr COARSER BY WE iGdT
U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES
~
'°"'"1~-
0
. ;e Q "'tf'lN 0 0 ,-.: <t ,t
~I IO N ie Q
0
,xi ai ~I '<t N--
00 '<1' d
2 0
36" 24" 1a" 12 a" 2" I" 5/8" 3/8" 1/4" 19 IG ~o 40 60 100 200 1 ~o" :21": ,~ .. : 10* 1 e" I I 1/£ I 31,4° I 1/t".
I I 4 8 1 14 : 18 ; 35 j 50 I 70 140 I I
' I 0
I0 I
20 I-
-*-*- ::r:
,:.!}
-- 30 w
~
40 m >-
a::
50 w VJ a:
4 60 00 l-
~-~-- 70 l.d z u
- a::
w 80 0.
go
!00 0.002 o. 00!
COBBLES SILT or CLAY Coarse Fine I Coarse Medium Fine JULY 271 1978 AMENDMENT 2 Ii-;.S.,!;.p_!s_!'
Hole No. Depth J..;.o.--+-_ _ _ _+-_ _ _
---t-_-t-_ 1r----
I I C!assl1iectkm ---1--------------~ SUBJECT 1
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST PROGRAM i-----+------4----f---t--t-+--+-----;--------------+I SAMPLE.tt4 GRADATION
________ ~CROWDER- QUARRY CRUSHED STONE
---"'*--~ h F~GlJRE 2 .5.4- 38 D
0 8
~
~
Cl) u a::
I-u w
..J ID w 'It d <I)
- E ti 0 L&J a:::
<{
w I- ..J
(/)
0 _,J
(..)
(/)
<{
a:: 0 w
- ii:: I-
<{ c:t w :E flt 0.. (.) Q. LL 0.
0 0 0
w :<{ ID 0
- r:
u a::: N 0 CJ) z c:t W I-
-II II a:
L&J
- E 0
u ~,; \~ (:)__
al 2 I 0 z
~
~
0 0 I() 0 It) 0 0
I()
,.._ 0 IO ,.._ It') N 0 N
0 0 I()
0 N
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 q 0 0
(U!/U!) Nl'i~lS 30nll1dW'i 31enoa Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TYPICAL CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST RESULTS FIGURE 2. 5 .4 - 39 Sl-£ET I OF 4
0 8
z 0
...ti (I) 0 a:
I-0 w
...I w Wi--
~ rt')
~w~ 0
< $ en LI.I
.... (!)
0 ccII -
0 LaJ
.J
(/) < (/) 0 llC;W >-
0
< z
~ i.L -
rt')
Lu'?,-...
()
Q. -Ill Q,,
u..
0 u:C u ~o
- 0 Z -0 0::
<1: ~ II 0::-
~ t- LaJ 0 -cs II a:,
u <
U')
)o ,tf ~
=>
0 z 0 0 I()
0 N
I()
t,...
0 ti')
l()
N 8 IO 0
N 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 ci 0 (U!/U!) Nl\f~!S 3an111dW\f 31enoa Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TYPICAL CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST RESULTS FIGURE 2. 5.4*39 SHEET 2 OF 4
0 0
0
~
~
I-(/)
u 0:
I- C\I u
4J
..J u
IJJ 4J
~ ~
I()
(/)
0 IJJ 2
ct:
- II 0 _J 4J z
0::
0 u 4J I-(/)
0 I-(/)
(..)
(/)
4J lll:
ct:
4J a..
2
- -IA Q. LL 0
IJJ 8. 0
(/) 1'- 0 w 0 0
- .r u 0::
z --
(X)
~
II a::
ct: z II
~
w IJJ 0
u ~ ~lb -~ 0 CD z
b V
0 0 0 ,._
I() 0 I() 0 I()
I()
80 C\I 0
0 in 0
C\I 0
0 0
0 0
I()
0 0
C\I 0
0 0 fJ!/U!) Nl~lS 30nll1dW'I 31snoa Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TYPICAL CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST RESULTS FIGURE 2.5.4-39 SHEET 3 OF 4
8
~
F r!(/)
uu ii: ~
I- (/)
u LtJ
..J
- t.O LtJ LtJ 0 -
z 0
2 I- Q:
II ~ ~- 0 en L&J ct (/') (/) 0 w ..J
~
LtJ I- ~ 0 0
(/) ..J x>-
ct 0::
LtJ 0::
ct ... -u, ~
8 0..
LtJ
- o
(.I
,-..; 0 Q.
0 Q 0:: N 0 z ~ -
ct ;t 2 0 II i:.,
(\J 11 0
0 a:
L&J 8 5)c lo CD
- E
- )
z A
0 0 0 0 I()
~
~ ~
I() I() C\I 0
N ,-.. (\I 0 I()
0 0 8 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 (U!/U!) Nl't~lS 30nll7dW't 31enoa Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TYPICAL CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST RESULTS FIGURE 2,5.4-39 SHEET 4 OF 4
SOUTH NORTH BORING P-25 BORING P-10 860 EX1ST11'lG GROUND SURFACE: i OORl~IGP q i r--.... j j
BORING P - IS
- MODERATELY TO SEVERELY I --- ~r---._ SOR INS P-9 WEATHERED ROCK OCCA so1~1
- .LL '(
840t------------
---t=c.\-:::...._-_--++--c::--?--,.-,,...;;=-**- -- I-
~, r - -:!:-. :----:_ - --::::::--. l__
-80R11"Nf-'"':;-- - -------
I
_ WEA THEREO !9 A SOIL (ON_SISTEC.C.N"'-'CY~_
~
~ro, .:::~:ti~----~/
tf::1/4----l!!f---:-:--;,--.....JJ ----...., -..__
a20 1 --------------------1??1--- OVERBURDEN
---t;S--=- t.>!L),NG "-
8001---------------------- \
780f-----------
UL.
7 4 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----***--*- --*---t;e-----** - ~ * - -- = ------.-+------- -
I
.c IC 720t---------------- '"
~
¥ 700 1 - - - - - - - - - * - ~
680t-----------------*---- --
=
5 GLEN ROSE ~ FORMATION Ill ..* ,.**. - **
le 6001-------------------t~8;_______,a________.f1
~~i 5aoi-----------------------
~ TWIN
{ctt-,_ _ _ _ _ ,,__
MOUNTAINS
---** "**-***--*******-**¥A FORMATION Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 560 1-------- - - - - - - - - - -------1~ ;r
*********----*-**-lr,ii-------
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
540 KEY FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ifj LIMESTONE (f]sHALE
~CLAYSTONf-BOTTON OF FOUNDATION MAT CROSS SECTION A-A 1
UNITS 1 and 2 200 0 200 400 LJSANO'.>TONE- - UPPER LIMIT OF WEATHERED-TO-FRESH 1
ROCK WHICH DOES NOT CONTAIN SOIL LIKE ZONES.
scale feet CROSS SECTION A-A Refer to Figure 2.5.5-5 fot Location of Cross-Section FIGURE 2. 5. 4- 40
800t----------
780 T.G.PE 760 740 I-w w 720 LL
~
70 z
0 j:::
~ 680 w
_J w
660 640 620 TWIN MOUNTAIN 600 ~--- -*---- FORMLU'.ION Amendment 4 January 31, 1978 500t-------
560 i - - - - - - ~ COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 5 LEGEND 1
UNITS 1 and 2 KEY:
~ LIMESTONE 0 SHALE CROSS SECTION B- 8 200 0 200 400 1
~ CLAYSTONE ....,.. BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION MAT CROSS SECTION B-8 Refer to Figure 2. 5. 5-5 for TTrn W'&1-rwll~IJ o8bw~~1rfb~;;~0to~t~H scale fl.
Location of Cross-Section t..2J SANDSTONE LIKE ZONES.
FIGURE 2 .5. 4 - 41
24.9 KSF MAX.
Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FOl.NDATICN PRESSURE DISTRIBurICN UNDER CONTAINMENT DURING SSE FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4- 4 2
I I I I I I j i I i I i I f I I ;
I I I I I I I i I I
.. I I I I I :
r '
- [ I I I
I I t r '
I I I l I I I I I
TOTAL SWELL (INCHES)+-+---HH-H-+--+--++++---+-+---+---,-+---...--w 1
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,+-+-+-----H-+-+-i-++-+--+--+-+*+ri-0
- 4 ......._....._,_..__.__ 0
- 6 O
- 8 -+--+-+-4-+---1->-+--,_---'-~ ~~1 ~
0 I O* 2 j i l l I 1 j I I
0 f I J.,,
I
- I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I
SLAB l I
' i I I I I I I I I I
2 1 I : I I
I
~~-t-+~~1--=t~ti~~1--;t--z,t-;_f--tt---+-t1~t-i-~+:_t+~ti-=++:_i-+~ti~1=-l-+~ti~:..t+~ti~tt+~i.~~t.ij~:~~ti::_{j1=-:--:i~t-ij :
1 1 4 : I I H-++-1r++-.--+-r1- L I I
I I I I I i
' . I I I I I 1 i I I I I I
- I ! I I I I l I I ! I ! i I
' ! J : I I ! I
' I +-
EXAMPLE (Hypothetical) :
! I . ! I i
- i::: I I ( l) Equivalent slab thickness= 2' 8 I
( 2) Claystone layer is 1.0' below p... 6 r I I I !
I li:i.
Cl I I bottom of slab and is 1.5' thick I 1 I
LIMESTONE I
( 3) Total heave at top of slab=
! i heave at "A" minus heave at "B" I =0.17"-0.08" I
i I =0.09" 8 i I I I I I I I i I I I I ' I
- I I I I i
I : I i I I I I i I I I I J I
' I i
I 10 I
I I
, I I 1 I I I I I l I I I
, i I I T
I I I I I I I
_l___ I I Amendment 67 I I February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
I FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EFF'.ECI' OF CJMSTCNE I rn FOUNDATION I 7 i I FIGURE 2
- 5
- 4 4 3 I I
TYPE MATERIAL - BEDDING SAND 5 --
- KEAN RELATIVE DENSITY= 90.551 STD. DEV. = 7 .11 N = 18 4 - ....
lZi 801 RELA TIVE DENSITY
- MINIMUM ALLOWED 1 - ...
0 48 50 52 5'1 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 e2 81\ 86 PB 00 ~2 ~4 % ~8 100 102104 1C6 RELATIVE DENSITY COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 RELATIVE DENSITY TEST
SUMMARY
Amendment 67 FOR BACKFILL AR~UND ~tEi~~y I ELEC. MANHOLES ND OU K February 5, 1988 FIGURE 2.5.4-44
25 - TYPE MATERIAL - CRUSHED STONE
< 2" SIZE MEAN COMPACTION = 102.51%
STD. DEV. = 4.76 N .. 108 20 ....
--* ... 95'.t COHPACTION MINIHUH ALLOWKD 5
0 I 88 90 'J2 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110 112 114 116 118 PERCENT COMPACTION COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PERCENT COMPACTION TEST SU"'1A.RY FOR BACKFILL AROUND CATEGORY I Amendment 67 CONDUIT February 5, 1988 FQff 2.5.4-45
10 TYPE MATERIAL - BEDDING SAND 9
-- MEAN RELATIVE DENSITY= 90.104 STD. DEV.= 6.85 8
-- N = 40 7 ....
- r.
Cl.I 6 .... 80% RELATIVE DENSITY
~
Cl.I MINIMUM ALLOWED
~ 5 _,..
~
0 Ai::
fz.:i 4 - ,..
I 3 ....
2 ,..
1 _,_
0 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 ')4 96 100 102 104 106 RELATIVE DENSITY COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 RELATIVE DENSITY
SUMMARY
FOR BEDDING AROUND CATEGORY I Amendment 67 PIPELINES February 5, 1988 FIQff 2.5.4-46
10 - TYPE MATERIAL - CRUSHED STONE
< 2" SIZE MEAN COMPACTION - 102.10%
9 ... STD. DEV. = 3. 94 N = 29 8 _,_
7-95'1 COMPACTION MINIMUM ALLOWED 6 .
3 s -..
rn E,-1 ti.)
~4 r-i:,,.
0 i:1111 f;:l 3 -,..
I:z: 2 1 -~
0 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110 112 PERCENT COMPACTION COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PERCENT COMPACTION TEST
SUMMARY
FOR BACKFILL AROUND CATEGORY I PIPELINES Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 FIGl.ff 2.5.4-47
40 -.. TYPE MATERIAL - CRUSHED ROCK
< 2* SIZE MEAN COHPACTIOH
- 101.251 STD. DEV.
- 4.46 N
- 134
-e 30
- I- 951 COKPACTIOR MINDtUN ALLOWIID
~
fl)
~
t
=
I 20 ..
10 -~
0 C4 86 88 90 ')2 94 96 93 I r I 100 102 104 106 108 110 112 114 116 PEUCENT COMPACTION COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FNAL. SAFETY ANALYSIS REPON'T UNITS 1 and 2 PERCENT COMPACTION TEST SUMMAR FOR BACKFILL AROUND THE SERVIC Amendment 67 WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE NOTE: Accepted Values Are~ 95% February 5, 1988
CELL 40 CELL 40 CELL 20 courn courn 36 C0UNT 18 32 16 28 14 24 12 20 10 16 16 8 12 12 6 8 8 4 4 4 2 0 ....__ _ _ _ _ _ __j____J'---==i...-
0 0 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 25 90 95 100 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
% PASSING f~ SIEVE % PASS ING #8 SI EVE % PASSING #16 SIEVE SPECIFICATION LH'ITS 95-100% SPECIFICATION LHUTS C0-100% SPECIFIC,\HON UliITS 50-8!i%
CELL 22 COUNT CEtl 20 CELL 20 40 COUNT f'.l)'JIH 18 18 36 16 16 32 14 14 25 12 12 24
~,,
10 10 ~,J 8 8 16 6 6 12
~
4 4 "
2 2 4 0 0 0 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 ES 7G 75 0 s 10 1s 20 2s 30 35 ~o 45 50 (i 10 15 20 25 30 35 4{' ~'i 50
% PASSING #3C SW'[ PAS<H:G f/51' :'.:IEE % PASSING #100 SIEVE SPECIHCI\TION ur:rcs 25-60% SP[CIF'CATIC:' LIIT~ 10-~~& SPECIFICATION LIMITS 2-10%
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
,::;TE: .\LL (10(;%) P.1SSillG 3/8" SIEVE UNITS 1 and 2 JULY 31, 1980 BACKFILL - HISTOGRAM OF GRADA*
TION LIMITS FOR BEDDING SAND FIGURE 2. 5. 4-49
CELL CELL 10 CELL 10 COUNT COUNT COUNT 9 9 8 8
'1 l i---7 7 7 6~ 6 6 sl 5 !
5 11 4 ; 4 ! 4 1L.
3 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
% PASSING #4 SIEVE 85 90 l
95 100' 2
l 0
50 55 I I 60 65
' I 70 75 I J --,--1 80 85 90 95 100
% PASSING #8 SIEVE lJ l 50 55 ' I.
60 65 70 75 I
80 85 90
% PASSING #16 SIEVE I I I I 95 100 SPEC I FI :ATIOl'I LIMITS 95-100% SPECifICATION LIMITS 80-100% SPECIFICATION LI~lTS 50-85%
CELL CELL 10 -, CELL 10 -
'il courn COUNT COUNT !
9 9 8 - 8 7 7 6 6 6 5-4-
-- 5 4
3 5
4 3
1--
3-2- 2 2 1
0 I 25 30 35 40 45 iI 50 I
55 60 I I 65 70 75 I
1 0
0 5 I
10 I
I 15 20 25 30 JS 40 45 50 1
0 0
7 5 10 15 20 25 I
30 35 40 45 50
% PASSING #30 SIEVE PI\SSH!G #50 sri:v:: % PASSING 11100 SIEVE SPEC I FIC,'\TION LIMITS 25-60% SPCCIFICATr'.)N LIMIT:; 10-30't SPEC I FrcATIOM LliHTS 2-10% COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DUCT BANK BACKFILL rlOTC: .\LL (100%) l'/\SSH:G 3/8" SIEV'.:
JULY 31, 1980 ~6 ~rR~§B~N8FsR~BDATION LIMITS FIGUflE 2.5.4-50
CELL 10 CELL 10 :
COUNT CELL 10 9 COUNT g COUNT \'.)
8 8 8 7 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 l i 1
i 0 +---,----,------1,** ... ., .L .. 0 +*****~-* I 0 +--t--+~+---t----+~t---+---r---i~
50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 10 15 20 25 3'0 35 40 45 50 55 PASSING l" SIEVE % PASSING ',/ SIEVE % PA'.;SING #4 SI EVE SPEC I Fl CATION Lil!ITS 50-85% SPECIFICATION LrnITs 25-65% SPECIFICATION LitlITS 15-50%
CELL 14 COUNT 13 12 11 10 CELL CELL COUNT 18 9
8 7
COUNT u
u 13 6
5 trg 4 8 3
2 1
i 3
2 0
1 0
0 50 5 10 45 50 PASSING #10 SIEVE % PASSING /1100 SIEVE SPECIFICATiON LIMITS 5-40% SPECIFICATION LIMIT~ 0-10% COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 NOTE: ALL (100%) PASSING 2" SIEVE JULY 31, 1980 FIGURE 2.5.4-51
CELL n
20 CELL 10 CELL COUNT 19 COUNT COUNT n
15 14 9
8 16 15 7 14 13 12 6 H 11 1 5 lb9 4 8 7
3 g 2
~
OJ.-------+------+---+----+-----1-+--+~
I 0 _,_____,_--I--+--+-...._-+--+-+---
50 55 60 65 70 75 BO 85 90 95 100 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 15 20 2 5 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
% PASSING l" SIEVE % PASSING 1/2" SIEVE % PASSING #4 SIEVE SPEC! FI :ATION LIMITS 50-85% SPECIFICATION LitHTS 25-65% SPECIFICATION LIMITS 15-50%
CELL COUNT ii 25 CELL 24 COUNT 23 CELL re COUNT 13
~~
19 17 16 o-16 -
15 15 14 H
12 13 12 lb 9
i~
i
~1 g
4 3
2 -
6 J____J_-----+-------1-----+-~~~~ i -'---'---l---l-------------
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 0 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5() 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
% PASSING #100 SIEVE
% PAS,ING #10 SIEVE % PASSING #40 SIEVE SPECIF!C,'\T!QN LIMITS 0-10% ~-------------1 SPECIFICATION LIM!TJ 5-40% SPECIFICATION LIMITS 0-20% COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 NOTE: ALL (100%) PASSING 2" SIEVE DUCT BANK TRENCH & MANHOLE JULY 31, 1980 BACKFILL - HISTOGRAM OF GRADA-TION LIMITS FOR CRUSHED ROCK FIGURE 2. 5 .4-52
ELL 10 CELL 10 CELL COUNT 10 COUNT OUNT 9 I 9 9 8 "~
8 8 7 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 5 ~
4 4 I- -
4 --
3 3 "-" 3 2
1 0 * *-- ~c wI 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
% PAS3ING 1" SIEVE 2
1 0
25
~7-,
30 35 n
40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
% PASSING ';" SIEVE 2
1 0
0 5 i- n 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
% PASSING #4 SIEVE 50 SPECIFICATION LIHITS 50-85% SPECIFICATION Llr!TS 25-65% SPECIFICATION LIMITS 15-50%
CELL 10 l CELL 10 CELL 10 -
COUNT 9--i COUNT COUNT 9 9
8 8 -*- 8 7 7 7 -
6 6 6 5 5 5 4 4 4 nrill7 3 3 3 2 2 '-"""'
I I I I 1 .
0 0 5 n
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 1
0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 I
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
% PAS;ING #10 SIEVE % PA~SING #100 SIEV[
% PASSING #40 SIEVE SPECIFICATION LIMITS 0-100%
SPECIFICATION LIHITS 5-40% SPECIFICATION LIMITS 0-20% COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 t!OTE: ALL (100%) PASSING 2" SIEVE SURFACE WATER PIPE TRENCH 3ACK-JULY 31, 1980 FILL - HISTOGRAM OF GRADATION LIMITS FOR CRUSHED ROCK FIGURE 2.5.4-53
s::z He, y
He 2
~y O(h BACKFILL ROCK 1S't = tO pcf 1't = 10 pcf LOAD/LIN.FT. SOIL* SURCHARGE* WATER COMPACTION OF WALL 1S'w = 62. pcf Ko= 0. 7 1'w = 62. pcf Ko= 0.33 STATIC ,
<H11S'cH2 1 lS'.,
1 Ko4Hs 1/2H:lS'w 1/2 CTcHc 1
<Tc= 400 psf 6KAE : 0.04 (SSE)
DYNAMIC <~ ~-H:lS'wl 1/2AK" 6K**H1 O. 1(-L 12 O(hlt H1*,] -
O(h = 0.12 O (SSE)
COMBINED 1/2<H~ ~t-H~lf1)(1(0 +6*> <<o*AK.>H1 ¥~HI '1+0.820(h) 1/2<TcHc1 He,= 2 FT 6 0 03 Hc2 = FT K.a. * (oae)
- APPLICABLE FOR Hz 'SH11 IF Hz> H,. Hz SHOULD BE TAKEN TO BE EQUAL 6KAE = 0.10 (SSE) och
- 0.069 (oBE) TO H1 SINCE STANDING WATER DOES NOT AFFECT THE MAGNITUDE OF EFFECTIVE STRESS. COMANCHE PEAKS ES O(h : 0.12 0 (SSE) *
- FOR UNIFORM SURCHARGE ONLY. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 6K.e a 0.05 (OBE)
UNITS 1 AND 2 O(h
- 0.06 9 (OBE)
STATIC ANO DYNAMIC LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES October 14, 1988
CIRC. WATER 7 B' 0
0 0
O>
~-----\ --------------------
~
~\
-EVAPORATION POND NO.
TO BE CLOSED AND ABANDONED IN PLACE 1-00 0
lNIOOOO 2D
- 1
- 17 TURBINE BUILDING AUXILIARY L ;- BUILDING 10
_j A **5 a I A' 2: *"
0 Ji ~I 0
Q 2: I 0
q a:
Q
~
lU lc.q 11.u
- s 0
[]
AOMIN t
BLDG
_J AMENDMENT 87 DECEMBER 18, 1992 NOTE: PERMANENT PIEZOMETERS NUMBERED COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FROM 9 TO 25 //\:STALLED DEC. 1987 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOCATION OF PIEZOMETERS FIGURE 2.5.4-55
(
3~ <S"TE.e.L C.A.'5lt.J6.
~- _,-..
CEMENT/ BENl"CN\TE uR:::MJT s) t
"" ~
- J tz. t.D, 'SCHED. 4o PV~ RISER CJ l
1* eENTc~1-re. 'SEA\..
\[) ..\> l
~
u..1 e-r
§ s" &RE.HOLE..
....._-+--- ID'Cl" SI..Cii'E.D ( O\Q 1~)
~HE.0. 4o PVC..
- 1==::::m-..-+--- E. ND f>\..Uu 9
~-----~----~---~COLOAAOOµ 6A.~D 2Q-4c MES\.\
PlE.ZOME.TER DE..1AlL Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSlS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PIEZOMETER DETAIL FIG. 2.5.4-56
fl N
- Ill °'* -I *
- 0 1* .
SPEC.IFIC.ATION
.LH-++--+ GS-& c.R\TEq:,1.,c,,.
HO &TR-Att-.lS ct t:>E!VELCPE.o IX Ol.)RJN&
1/)
(/) o.?,,
TEST--\@
1--4-!-+++-+--H-+-H+H++++++++
...,Vl~
COMANCHE PEAK S E.S.
FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Ol....l_._,.1...L...L..L.J..1...1..J...L...u......,_
I 6 10 !iO 100 UNITS 1 and 2 NUMSE:R OF C.. '(C.LE.S {N)
- Cyclic 'Jriaxial Testing rr iut:.e1,ort Limestone Amendment 75 November 18, 1988 IL)', u re **
- 5 . 4- 5 7