ML22280A181

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

FSAR Certified Amendment 111, Chapter 2, Figures, Part 1 of 2 - Redacted
ML22280A181
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 02/01/2022
From: Dennis Galvin
NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL4
To:
Galvin D, NRR/DORL/LPL4
Shared Package
ML22277A832 List:
References
EPID L-2022-LRO-0015
Download: ML22280A181 (238)


Text

0-1{~,,~l~;i;~!~~j:..: ;:_;:"; \JV,, r lt\J!t*ON ao.un ...,.H.

OKLAHOMA NEW Mqrco co 0 '0 tr:

0-......_.

t-0 AO Mdes SCALE 10 0 10 20 30 40 so 60 70 MILES 8 AA A A E::--:::--3 E::--:::--3 SITE COORDINATES UNIT NO. UNIT NO. 2 TEXAS GRID Y=229,723.96 Y=230,010.86

( FEET) X= 1 , 911 , 921 . 11 X=l ,911 ,951.27 U.T.M. GRID N=3,573,903 N=3,573,991 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

(METERS) E=614,393 E=614,401 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (ZONE 14)

UNITS 1 and 2 LATITUDE 32°17 1 52.02 11 32°17 54.85 1 11 LONGITUDE 97°47 06.15 1 11 97°47 05.79 1 11 SITE LOCATION FIGURE 2.1-1

~,-i r,***

j / /

/

~- (/' /

~ ',__./'

/

/ ..

{ ~

'; *. ~ , ROA[, fASEM(NT CEMETAAY )

CREEK RESERVOIR /(,;

. . ~ \\

NO' PART(), S!Tf ( .

PROPlRTY *

~lf_,;

~

I

[ ~_/-. __ _v )

~v --..J

/

TOl.l.lS.F RV , CO. *IN TIIAC, - ~ ,

AMENDMENT 89 AUGUST 20, 1993 y COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S

---HCLUSION AREA FI\IAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PLANT ACC[SS ROAD UNITS 1 and 2

- - * - - - - ROAD [A$[MENT

- - HOOD/S~ERVELL COONTY l!HE SITE AREA FIGURE 2. I 2

/

r- -- --

/

/

/

/

SQUAW CREEK RESERVOIR ALL EXCLUSION AREA SURFACE RIGHTS ARE OWNED BY THE APPLICANTS \

\

(

I I \....

I I

I

\

/

/

/

/

TO ~- 1, l l,f. /

RL CO. *I* TIW:,K /

AMENDMENT 87 DECEMBER 18, 1992 LUOD

- - - - UCLV~IO!I AA!:~

COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 lCAU o ,oo 1200 ,toe 2~ rur OWNERSHIP OF SURFACE RIGHTS IN THE EXCLUSION AREA FIGURE 2. I - 2 A

/

/

/

/

/

~l=t

~\

l( ~TAl'f SQUAW CREEK RESERVOIR

"-*t',

....,/ 1 I

I

(

I TO l.T. I l,F.

In'. co. ,-iiir~~


~----=----'~

AMENDMENT 87 DECEMBER 18, 1992 LEGEND EXCLUSION AREA COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

PLANT ACCESS ROAD FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

- - - - - - - - - LONE STAR GAS 6" PIPELINE UNITS 1 and 2

- - - - - - - WEST TEXAS GULF 26" Oil PIPELINE t200 , &oo HOO fE£T EASEMENTS WITHIN THE EXCLUSION AREA FIGURE 2.1-2 8

.'\ -~ #~

-~,,.

\ \ "\ '\

IMM'.U ,011t ..... IIIIAL EX"-.OlltATION MAY K - - - - ,

Al.LOWl:D SQUAW CREEK RESERVOtR UTBML MAZMD \

AfE ZONE

\

/ \_

/ ----

(

I I

I ll A.T. I S.F.

M. Cl. IN11.ac AMENDMENT 89 AUGUST 20, 1993 LUIIII IMMSS '°" llt!N("AL EXltLOtlATION MAY IE - - ~

- - - - ucu111* ~

ALLOWED COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

l'lMT .-ca:ss - FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

- S S A"O EGA[ SS IIIGHTS fOII Mltt[IIAL IIITU!t:HS UNITS 1 and 2 OUTITANOIIIG KALI 0 - IHC 1111 J . . . ,.fT EXCLUSION AREA MINERAL RIGHTS F!Cilff 2.1-2 C~

i

)

\\ i 1/i/ <*.)/to

)

)40

  • y*~_

, \ ,,,

~ p lJECTED KEY:

,jMATED 1976 POPULATION CTED 1980 POPULATION 2000 POPULATION iJ~ ~

\ )

.._:,.i,._ *NOTE. 1970 AND PROJECTED 2020 POPULATION

'""\ \ ...) FROM O TO 1 MILE IS NIL *

_j/

67

\

CLESURN

_,,\:TATE PARK

\

\ ".~~y

'X~ IN MILES

\(

0 2 3 4 5

',~-,: ~--c*,.s:..**

98 106 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

117 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION BY SECTOR-AREA s 1--------:--::-- O TO 10 M,_1_:1I~L=ES'='.__.------..

FIGURE 2.1-3

N GRAFORD*

DALLAS ENE WNW

~

RANGER WAXAHACHIE w E

~ITALY HILLSBORO r ESE KEY:

20

~T 60 ESTJMATE!.i 1976 POPLLAT10f.

1/){i;; POFl,l,ATION 2000 P-OPutATl ON

REFERENCE:

THE BASE fOR THlS MAP WAS ?RE PARED FROM PORT IONS OF THE FOLLOWING U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY I 250,000 MAPS ABILENE, 1954, REVISED 1965 COMANCHE BROWNWOOD, 1954, REVISED 1964 DALLAS. 1954. REV I SEO 1963 SHERMAN, 1954, REVISED 1963

\ WACO, 1954, REVISED 1963

\

\

SW \

\

\

\

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 0 tO 20 MILE;S

!!!!'~"lii***~iil""l----iiiiiil'~~~~~lllllj UNITS 1 and 2 POPULATlctl DiSTRIBlTTON BY SECTOR-AREA 10 TO 50 Ml LES s

FIGURE 2.1-4

\

\

, -I LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EXCLUSION AREA

    • it..._' ' t

'\ .t 1[,*\ .

__;;r** 4< * ,;,1, '

  • \ ) '-\,'

-'*-1" -'f

  • /.

r-*:)',

,\, ,,*r j '. <\. * * ~-* *(. .

.~-:****  :, ***** ./. (, .. ;~; : ~--~:: : : COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

,,.,..:,r-;--"""'-' ( FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

/i.

..  ! ,i,'! * -: ; *i

  • UNITS 1 and 2

'****** ... ~

'it~""'~ . ,.J(. ~ ~\V t' ..

I IIILI LOW POPULATION ZONE

,1 ~ ~ d,

,_i _;;_;,,-..,.._Jr * ,.--\-4;;..

,. _c

.("'

97°47. JO" \ /

r*~-

. 0-4 111 LES FIGURE 2,1-5

10,000,000 ------------------r----..-------,----

5,000,000 1------4-----l------+-------+-----+------------ll------------l 0

1/

1,000,000 ASSUMED UNIFORM POPULATION DENSITY OF 500 PEOPLE/ SQUARE MILE 0/j 500,000 z

0 j:::

c,:

c..

0 0..

WJ

> 100,00 s

i:

u 50,000 0

I ~ CPSES CUMULATIVE POPULATION CURVE, 1980 I

I 0 f

10 5,000 l--------4-----lJ-------1-----1------+-----+---------l------------l

(:)

I I

0 1,000 ...___ __..!...___.__---1,.

I _ _ _........_ _ _..J.__ _ _,.___ _ ____,1_ _ ___,

0 10 20 30 40 50 MILES FROM CPSES SITE COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 1980 CUMULATIVE POPULATION FIGURE 2,1-6

10,000,000 . - - - - - - , - - - - - , - - - - - . . - - - - - . . - - - - - . - - - - . , . - - - - - - - - ,

S,OOO ,OOO ~-AS-SU-M-ED_U--J-N-1F-O-RM_P_O-PU--4LA_T_IO_N_D_EN_S_IT+-Y-----;-i-/

91* i OF 1000 PEOPLE / SQUARE MI LE 0  : i

/j I/

~ /  !

0 1,000,000 l - - - - - - + - - - - + - - - - - F - - - + - - - - - - + - - - . 0 - - - - - - + - - - - - - I 500,000 0

z 0

~

0.

0 0..

u.J

> 100,000

~ 0 I

....l 1------1--i u 50,000 0 CPSES CUMULATIVE POPULATION CURVE, 2020 0

I 5,000 1 - - - - - + + - - l - - - + - - - - + - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - + - - - - + - - - - - - - 1 0

0 1,000 ,..__ ____.,.___..___--'-_ _ __.__ ____.__ _ _ _ _ _ _....___ ____.

0 10 20 30 40 50 MILES FROM CPSES SITE COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 2020 CUMULATIVE POPULATION FIGURE 2,1-7

/ ....

. o*

. ~

-I

  • 0
  • :D :

'ADO..___'\:'. *v,c,o~ \~:s KEY

  • AIRPORTS STATUTE MILES 0 10 20
: : :~~ REFUELING TRACKS COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

VICTOR AIR LANES FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 AMENDMENT 82 JULY 31, 1991 AIR TRAFFIC OTO 20 MILES REFERENCE; This map was prepared from portions of sectional oeronoutiecl charts, Son Antonio a Ft.Worth. FIGURE 2. 2-1

0 K LAH OM A.

0 STUDY REG ION - I =-TA LIMITS ~

  • Ml DLAND TEXAS SAN ANTONIO STATUTE MILES 0 100 200 iw-----t e----1 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 CLIMATOLOGICAL STATIONS AND REGION FIGURE 2. 3-1

_)

0

/


r---+---

7 0

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 AIR POLLUTION POTENTIAL NUMBER OF DAYS IN 5 YEARS

Reference:

Holzworth, G.C., 1972 FIGURE 2. 3- 2

FORTWORTH DALLAS SITE CLEBURNE DU TEPHENVIL SCALE IN MILES 0 20 40 60 80 100 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOCAL METEOROLOGICAL STATIONS FIGURE 2. 3-3

t~\J SCALE IN Ml LES 0 0.5 1 2 8 00

\..

COMANCHE PEAK S. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHY OF THE COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION AREA s FIGURE 2, 3-4

1000 1000

_j

(/)

2 900 NW SITE SE 900

":J

(/)

2 GRADE i,--:

i,--: LL LL 800 800 z z 0 0 I-

.:= <:(

<:(

700 700 w w ..J

_j w w

600 600 5 4 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) 1000 1000 NNW SSE _j

(/)

(/)

-2 I-'

LL 900 SITE GRADE 900 2 t-=

LL z

0 800 RESERVOIR 800 z0 I- -

<:( I-

<:(

> 700 700 >

w w

_j _J w w 600 600 5 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DI STANCE FROM STATION {MILES)

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN IN FIGURE 2.3-4 FIGURE 2. 3-5

1000 1000

....J E -

....J

(/)

, SITE 900

~~ 900 ~

Cf)

~ GRADE I-

~ LL LL z 800 800 z0 0

I-I- <(

<(

> 700 700 >

w w ....J

....J w w

600 600 5 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) 1000 1000

....J

(/)

~ 900 SITE ESE -....J

(/)

900 ~

WNW GRADE

.,_: ~

LL RESERVOIR-I--- SQUAW CREEK LL z 800 800 z 0

.::<(

> 700

--~---::J DAM 700 0

I-

<(

w >

w

....J w ....J w

600 600 5 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES)

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN IN FIGURE 2. 3-4 FIGURE 2.3-6

1000 1000 SW NE :J

_J (/)

(/)

~

900 SITE GRADE 900 i--:

LL i--:

LL RESERVOIR 800 800 z z0 ~*W*:W.:*W~*..,.....; 0 f-f- <i

<! 700 700 >

w w

_J

...J w

w 600 600 5 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) 1000 1000

JCl)

WSW ENE -...J

(/)

~ 900

~

s: ~

900 ~

i--: s:

LL ci: ~

z0 800 RESERVOIR V) 800 z f- ~ ~ 0 w

...J 700 ~

Qj

~

Qj 700 f-w

...J w w 600 600 5 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES)

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN

_ _ _I_N_EIGURE 2.3-4)

FIGURE 2. 3- 7

1000 1000 s ':J

..J (/)

~

(/) SITE ~

900 GRADE 900

~

s:: r=

r=

LL ii: LL 800 800 z z 0 0 I-I- <!

<! 700 700 >

w w

..J

..J w

w 600 600 5 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) 1000 1000

':J

(/)

SSW NNE -. .J

(/)

~

I-LL 900 SITE GRADE 900

-~

~

LL z- 800 800 z 0 0 I-

<( r-w 700 700 >

..J w w ..J w

600 600 5 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES)

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN IN FIGURE 2.3-4) _ _ _

FIGURE 2. 3-8

N WAXAHACHIE

/'A"'-~

a--..._ /

- ~EFrlENVILLE ~'

SCALE I~ MILES 0 10 20 30 40 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 GEilERP.L DPOG RAP~ IC FEri TU RES TO 50 r'.ILES FIGURE 2.3-9

NE WNW w 21°/o

\--- --

wsw\

s 10 METER 60 METER COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS AT CPSES FIGURE 2.3-10

N NE W 20% E ESE s

-DALLAS LOVE FIELD (1 MAY 1972 - 31 DEC. 1972)

---COMANCHE PEAK (15 MAY 1972 - 31 DEC. 1972)

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS FIGURE 2. 3-11

~Vl

...JP

,-:z:

,-o N 23Cl,000 .,,

we..

/BOo~~*/-

1

/EVAPORAT!ON POND NO.

.. TO BE CLOSED AND ABANDONED IN PLACE

~-

/

\

\I ,// .,

£QIJ/\Ll~*';:,0,

  • H c

,;£ I  ;  ;\tiD SP LLL-"'

/ . CRtY ELE~

. / / ____

//

i ...

J<

/ (_1~ AMENDMENT 87 DECEMBER 18, 1992

\(/

I~ ,

"---- RECREATIONAL FACILITY AND COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

SECURITY TRAINING AREA

\ FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FACILITY PLAN INCLUDING LOCATION OF METEOROLOGICAL TOWER 0 50(

FIGURE 2, 3-12

CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-13 This Figure has been deleted. 94 Amendment 94 August 1. 1996

CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-14 91 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994

CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-15 91 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994

CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-16 91 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994

CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-17 91 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994

N COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DILUTION FACTORS-LONG TERM (x 10-7 SECONDS/METER 3) 0 TO 5 MILES FIGURE 2. 3-18

s COMANCHE PE AK S E. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DILUTION FACTORS-LONG TERM (x 10- 8 SECONDS/METER3) 0 TO 50 MILES FIGURE 2. 3-19

LEGEND

--CATCHMENT BOUNDARY

- - - SUB-CATCHMENT BOUNDARY

  • * *
  • SPECIAL SUB-CATCHMENT FOR SAFE SHUT-DOWN DAM UN-I SUB-CATCHMENT IDENTIFICATION (WHERE NO STREAM IDENTIFICATION GIVEN)

A USG S STREAM GAUGING STATION NOTE RESERVOIR LEVEL SHOWN AT 780' THIS IS A FLOOD STAGE ONLY NORMAL OPERATING LEVEL IS BETWEEN 770' AND 775' SQUAW CREEK DAM 0 2000 4000 6000 FT

!""l""'l"iiii-~"iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~""'"""""""'!i REFER::NCE THE BASE FOR T>i!S MAP WAS PREPARED FROM PORTIONS m THE: ~OLLOWING USG S QUADRANGLE MAPS NE.IVO, 196\; PALUXY, !9GI; 11ILL CITY, 196 1; TOLAR, 1961; GRANBURY, i96! COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SQLA'./ CREEK REilf(/01 R :A TCIWENT FIGURE 2,4-1

Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 C FR 2 .390 COMANCHE PEAIC S.E.S.

flW. StffTY NW.'VSS AEPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ROOF CftAINS OF SAFEGUARD, MJXI..JNff 81 FUEL. llll.OING R(UIE 2.4-2

~ t-+'-~**____ --~ '31'- e+ ~ '1.9*-.o" r* 8 i

    • . I 1":*:*~~~c".--~~-~-~-,---"'------------------------------~-.....,.,.------1*"
.:~',*;:~: ,',.,;*.*.*;: (' *.*, :.',*"*.*. ..* ..... ~- ~31'.*.*:I_*,~.*.,.~: ~I..~~

.. f{:.;)

b

~.:..1.1.. i I ,-.> 0!

1. .:i

<"I 18 I i 11 I

SWITCHG,EAR 6cJILDINC, PART ?LAN - OPi::RATlfsG FLOOR.

@ E'L 83:,'7l0" UNIT,. '2 ':o<<i!TCf<iGt;:-t..R BcJllD1N<'.,

PA'?T ~LA."1 - OPERATING FL;'.>OR

~ G-1... e>?.i:!>'-10~

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SWITCHGEAR BUILDING ROOF DRAINS FIGURE 2.4*:3

Information Withheld in Accordance with 1'o CFR 2.390 COMANCHE PEAK S.E. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF SITE FIGURE 2 . 4 -4

- _....,\

\

\ _____ -1...,,

~~""'-

- ---\

\

\

\

\

\

\

\--- - \ -

\ \

\ \ 1 \

\

\----- --

l-- --,

\

\

\ ---

\

\\

+--_ -

\

\ \

-3/4-_

\

__ -\-----

\

\

I ---------

\

\-

\

\

\

\

\

---.Y" -- \ ------1..---

\ ...>---

\

\

..J.--

\

\--.....--

0 10 20 30 40 50Mrles

"'l--'l""l.....c+/-ii.l'

.....11111,....;,1oo;~ . . _ _ ,

REFERENCE The base for !his mop was prepared from o port ion of the Texas Hig hwoy mop, prepared for COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

Gulf Oil Corp by Rand Mc Nally, 1971 edition, o nd the Surface *Wot er Development map of the Texas Water FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Development Board, November 1968. UNITS 1 and 2 TEXAS PORTION OF BRAZOS RIVER BASIN FIGURE 2, 4-5

- P/JSSUJI K!NCOOJI l5Jl!LES UPSTNEAII (fl/ST/NC)

PARKER TARRANT JOHNSON STf PHENVlllf ERATH

/\ /

\

\ //

\ /

\ HAMILTON

\ \

\ \

Q 5 IQ i5 20 '/I

~i,,,,'l.***:,;-.-5**--""",.----~"""'"""'.._""""""""'"' COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PCSSIBlt 'UIURE Lm UNITS 1 and 2 REFERENCE The base fer this map was prepared from pcr!iors

... SELECTED STREAM GAGING STATIONS of US.G,S 1*2501 000 quadro:--~ mops of Abi'.ene 1 Co!los*For1 Worth, SELECTED PRECIPITATION Brownwood ond Woco sect,ons, GAGING STATIONS FIGURE 2,4-6

Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2 .390 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SURFACE l/ATER USER :*iAP Of BRAZOS RI VER FIGURE 2.4-7

400-----------------,---------.-----------.--------r----------,

a z

0

(..)

w

(/)

0::

w a..

1-w z w (!)0 u.

(..) 150 §~ - - - - - - + - - - - - - - -

<( 1-co (!)(f)

)

tl} 0 0

(.) a)

(\j C1>

(Z) a)

LI..

0 '° 0 0 0 (J) a) '

OJ 00 Cl z

<{

(/)

0 80 1----**-***-

r:

I- 70 >------

~

w

(!)

0::

<{ 501--------

c

(.)

(/)

Cl "TI 40 z

O ro C)
r: rn C
0

>-t)::,

V>Z U) :s:

m -j OOJ:;,, cl>

Z;:o;z

>-<Z z- rii--1 0 z

r-:i o::, (") C

.f:>, ::0::X,.J:;,, --1 -( I J::>rr ro I

N ~ UJ m 0-0 U') IT1 u, -' z 7J 201...._ _ _ _ _ _ _......_ _ _ _ _ _ _...1..._ _ _ _ _ _ __.__ _ _ _ _ _ __,__ _ _ _ _ _ _........___ _ _ _ _ ___,

)>0

....<-n -<

or: O.l m
i ~ 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 mr:i:,

IT1 Cl.

U) ;;,:::

0 0 :::0 0 N V5 OJ:;,,

v,z  :::0 U) CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IN THOUSANDS OF SQUARE MILES 0 m m 7J 0 U)

0

-I

160 PEAK INFLOW = 149,000 cfs 2200'8ROAD CREST 152 EMERGENCY SPILL~~ I I I I J AT. 78=!

140 790 100' UNCONTROLLED OGEE *-*- **----~ [..-+-- 1 PEAK OUTFLOW = 131,150 Cfs ~CREST SERVICE SPILLWA~- ----  !

788 ' AT 775.0 ---  : i I

~

I-786 I _L-- __... L---f? __. I 120 I 0 ~ '-.. I I V) u.

u I I I _; _l, l..---" l..---" i

'- COMBINED TOT AL ,DISCHARGE

... I l

I ~

784

/ '/

~/

0 I l Vl I 130 0 100 782 z I z J Q V) INFLOW I-780 5 ..,>

c j!!;

80 120 792 181 780

_J w 778 l

... 784 783

~

I.>

0::

\

785 Vv --- 1----- .l- ~ L---- 776 u

!!l 0

60 110

-78# 7B6A

,._ 100 774 0 20 40 6G 80 100 120 140

\--OUTFLOW 788~

II~! SPILLWAY DISCHARGE IN THOUSANDS OF CFS t

40 100 90 20 I

I

\\\ \_

90 7BSV' I

I 80 SPILLWAY RA TING 0

' , .... ,_ r---_

--- -- 60 I i

I(; ~

1/)

u.

V

... - 70 AREA IN THOUSANDS OF ACRES

//:

0 0 10 20 30 0 50 60 70 80 6 4 0 2

~g-789.7 A1 36.4 Hr-s.

820 TIME IN HOURS HYDROG RAPHS 70 60 800

-........ L--- ..--

-- i--

'I1;I~lt 789 j!; ~

780 r----....

. r<, ~ i--

C, 60 -~ 50 760

~ --1'---

788

~ CAPACITY-;;>

~7t I l ~ 740

,,V "'I'....

ij I/"ii

- 40 z 720 50 0 V ARE~~ V

~

ii: i==

I -'

4 100 I 786 ei ~ I

(

t;

"'u.

~

40 1 785 784 I

V/'i.J'/

30 w -'

680 660 I

TOP OF CONSERVATION STORAGE: ELEV.

AREA: 3,272 ACRES CAPACITY, 150,953 ACRE-FEET I I I I 1

I I

ns.o

"' \

DRAINAGE AREA, 64 SQUARE MILES DESIGN STORM RAINFALL: 39.1 INCHES 0 30 183 J 20 640 I I I I I 1//;1/2 DESIGN STORM RUNOFF, 34.1 INCHES <II O 20 40 60 80 100 :20 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 V 782 I....

20

-r 781 Ii 1?

/ ~ i - ~ ~780-81 781-82 10 CAPACITY IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET AREA - CAPACITY CURVE

i:;

,. ~"" 9 ~~ l=:J7JHO

"'" I L7f8 79

...~

~<<

10 778 0

~

L'.=777-78 716-17 775 - SPILLWAY DISCHARGE I I I COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 TIME IN HOURS FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNIT I and 2 MASS CURVE SQUAW CREEK RESERVOIR FLOOD ROUTING AMENDMENT 78 JANUARY 15, 1990 FIGURE 2.4-9 0S158'3027 ,OGN

5,000 I I

6. 14 Hrs.

I I 4,680 cfs

3. 45 Hrs. I IK I I I

I I \

I 4,370 cfs r, J I \

4,000 I

I "\ / \

3,600 cfs I

I I

I

~

\ ......._ UPPER WATERSHED 3,000 I \

(38. 0 SQ. Ml.)

I I

I I

I I

~

V)

\ a. MAX. 6 HOURS

'1 LL u - b. REST OF STORM

-z 0

...J LL

'\ '\

2,000 r AREAS ADJOINING\

THE LAKE (20. 3 SQ. Ml.)

\\

2 1,000 T

Ii \ \ '

J \ \ \_

j

~~

I

~

'\ ~ .............. ....__

0

/ ....__

0 3 6 9 12 15 TIME IN HOURS COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 and 2 SQUAW CREEK WATERSHED UNIT HYDROGRAPHS FIGURE 2.4-10

- ~


- ~

~

790 scR ot E\e-1. ?89 --

~

~

..,.,,.--- _,..,,,,,,- ~

- ~

-Ji-- - 788_ ~

- - I I - - ----

1s1 _ - ~

~

~

~

_,. - - '/

- E 0

'"Cl

--' _ 786 :,.....,---

~

~

_.,,,,. ~ _.

~

~

-- ~

fl)

E 18~-- ...,. .....

~~ / Crest at 769.5

_J w 785 w

_J

_,___i---

s4 J.;;.--,~ --

I,/

/

~

...- - ............... i--..

Lr--,....._

I.._

.........,1 -- ~

3 3

- - - -1s'!>

- - l,...-/ ,,,,,,,

a:

w ~-- .-/1/ l - 40

    • -.:- -----~

~

I-

<t - - - - 1si. / -

~ __...---~ /"' [ ..

- ---- s' - ~ ./

1...,..

~~~v

(/)

(/)

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

~V' 780 -----~9 / / FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

_,..,,,,,,- ~ ~ UNITS 1 and 2

p
?~

__. 11 . Safe Shutdown Impoundment

~/ Spillway 5(/ Discharge Characteristics FIGURE 2.4-11 776 0 5 10 15 20 DISCHARGE IN l .000 CFS

1,400 l ,300 l, 200 l, l 00 '\

1,000 \'

900 \

V)

LL 800 \

u z 700 \

3:

0

.....J LL 600 \

500 \ 2 400 \

300

' I\

200 I ~ .........

I ~

100 0

0

~

2 3 4 5


6 TIME IN HOURS COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 and 2 SAFE SHUTDOWN IMPOUNDMENT UNIT HYDROGRAPH FIGURE 2.4-12

95-------.------.-----,-1------.---,-----,---.---,----,...-.

25 YEAR RETURN PERIOD FLOOD POST POSSUM KINGDOM 0

z 0

(.)

w

(/)

0::

w a.. BEFORE COMPLETION OF 1- MORRIS SHEPPARD DAM w

w LL.

u ro u

LL.

0

(/)

0 z

<t

(/)

0

/L

c AFTER COMPLETION 1- OF MORRIS SHEPPARD
DAM ,

z 3:

0

...J LL

le::

<t 251-------+-----1-+-----I---+--------+---+--------,---+----~

w a..

...J

<t Z 15~-----+-~'---l-+----+-------+---+------t--+--~

z

<t 5 L------~----..1....---_.____ ....L..-_...,L__ _ _ ._ _. . _ _ _ " " " "

98 90 70 50 30 20 10 5 2 PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDENCE OF ANNUAL PEAK FLOW ON THE BRAZOS RIVER AT STATION 8-0910 NEAR GLEN ROSE FIGURE 2. 4-13

COSINE RAO !AL LENGT>!

OF PAPJ\LLEL TO ANGLE CENTRAL RAO!Al (STI\TUTE MILES)

(3) (4) (5) (6) 420 . 743 . 756 .562 .42 36° .809 . 795 .643 . 52 30° .866 .814 . 705 .61 240 . 914 l.4C 1.280 1. l 7 130 . 951 1. 32 i. 255 1.19 120 . 978 1.31 l. 282 60 .995 l.27 l.264 QC l.OOG 2. 01 50 . 995 2.01 2. 00 1.99 10 120 . 978 1. 78  !. 74 11 180 . 951 l .63 l. 55 1.47 12 24° . 914 1.51  : . 38 1. 26 13 3c;o .866 1.46 1. 26 1.09 l4 36° .809 .3C l. 18 , 96 420

  • 743 .80 1J.::: 0.0
13. 512 16 .94 EFFECTIVE Ft1Cfl ( Fel " L 25 ~ILES LOCATIOH: SGUA'a OW 420 360 300 240

. 743

.8G9

. 866

.914 1.33

.61

. 99

.65

. 70

. 56

  • 74
  • 53

.61

. 51

\0

..?so,

, __ jI t

f'-.__/~J 18° .951

  • 57 . 54 . 51 120 . 978 . 59 . 58 . 57 50 oo

.995 1.000 4.43

. 57 4.43

. 56 4.43 "Oo~1/2 60 .995 I. 74  !.73 l. 72 10 120 .978 1.55 L, 11 J80 . 951 l. 36 1.29 l. 73 12 240 . 314 1.28 1. JI 13 300 . 866 1.82 1. 58 l. 36 14 36° .809 I. 59 I. 29 L04 15 42° . 743 I. 34 1.00 . 74

13. 512 17. 24 EFFECTIVE FETCH (Fe) 1. 28 HlLES REFERE~CE:

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 1/Z \ MILE UNITS 1 and 2

..,,._,...,__,,,._.,,,_"""'_,o...,,...,,!!!!!!!!!...,,...,,.,.,,,,.1 KlLOMTE~

FETCH DIAGRAM PLANT S!TE AND SQUAW CREEK DA"i FIGURE 2, 4-14

NSTREAM OF DAM (3) (4) {5)

ANGLE CCS1t-<'E U:NGTU RAtU\.L LENG'l'H  :.tx;LE COSINE Ll'.f'iG'l'H RADil\L LENGTH FR0:-0: o,* er PARlJ,:.Xt., 'l'O FHOM. Of' ~;' l?Afu\Ll,I.;L TO CENTAA.L ANGLE AA.DIAL CU.J'!'RAL RADIAL CENTR/-.1. ANG::.£ FM!AL CENTRAL RADIAL

!SA:)!J\.L (FT) AADlAL (FT)

  • 743 371 276
  • 743 1200 892 663 n .8C9 551 446 .809 1200 971 795 3 .866 563 563 JCO .866 uoo 1126 975 4 .914 750 685 686 .9~4 1280 1170 s 180 .951 950 903 859 . 951 1450 1379 lJll 6 120 .97S 1000 978 956 6 ,978 47()0 4600 4499 7 60 .995' 1900 lB90 1080 7 .995 41SO 4129 4108 8 oo 1.000 1750 1750 B 1.CDO 3()00 3900 3'?00 9 60 .995 1691 1Gfl2 9 ,995 ,(,,22') 4208 10 120 ,978 l6CQ 1565 1530 10 2543 2487 11 180 .951 JOOQ 951 904 11 ,951 600 543 12 240 .914 650 594 543 12 .914  ;,vo 418

)QC ~866 500 375 13 .866 400 346 300 36° .809 400 324 262 14 .000 400 :tf.,2 420

  • 743 350 260 193 15 193

'roTAL 13.$12 TOTAL lL905 'JX/l'AL  ::..3.512 T'C"tl'AL 25fi2.!

TO BE CLOSED ABANDONED IN PLACE J

<.!)

z:.

-v,

--' 0 1-Z 1-0

,, 230,000 we..

V)

~~~-;- ~ ' s-~-._

j B

\

ti 227 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FETCH DIAGRAM SAFE SHUTDOWN IMPOUNDMENT DAM 0

FIGURE 2.4-15

/ !I/' l!f '

Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 I

I COMANCHE PEAK SES FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT U NITS 1 and 2 LAYOUT OF S.C.R. DAM

Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2 .390 r---

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 S. C.R. DAM EMBANKMENT SECTION AND DETAILS Fl(,URE 2. 4 -17

Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2 .390 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

Fl'IAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SPILLWAY PLAN AND PROFILE FIOJIE 2. 4

  • 18

Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2 .390 COMANCHE PE AK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SPLLWAY DISCHARGE CHANNEL GRADING I FIGl,flE 2 . 4 -19

Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2.390

_ ! COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SPILLWAY UNO(RORAIN SYSTEM FIQJRE 2. 4

  • 20

Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 COMANCHE PE AK S E. S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UN ITS 1 and 2 SAFE SHUTDOWN IMPOUNDMENT DAM CROSS SECT FIGURE 2 . 4

  • 21

Surface 90 80 70

  • 1.,...*

60

.J

  • I '>**- - **~**

C 60-~

C uJ I-W-~-1.-.I. "-' .;.___.__e-,._._._.c., --'-**-"---'- h-----.-++ *-+ HS4-h+ +-**-++*-+ H-~+ * +'~-,-+ * -*-+-+ W-,.+.....++-!-~-'+,.-,-1-+~,,+l-,a-++++-+-++-+-+-*++-l ---4-++,. ,_,_. i--.4-+~-+-h-+ + ,.._,~...,- ._ _ _,_ ______,_,_-+++~,-i L,

COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 1

!1 lJ '.

iii UNITS 1 and 2

1) ,.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __._

' AMENDMENT 10 Area and Capacity Characteristics of the

" MARCH 31. 1980 Safe Shutdown lmpoundment lnHially and --++**H--,
  • , After 40 Years of Service 100 200 400 Storaoe

Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 C FR 2.390 COMANCHE PEAK SE S FINAL SAFETY AI\IALYSIS REPORT UN ITS 1 anti 2 LAYOUT Of S.S.I. DAM A ND RELATED FACILITIES r C'-WE 2. 4

  • 23

100,000---------------------------------

I0,000 1----+-----+----i-..-------------'-----..---+---+------'----+-----+----+-------1/4 AVERAGE DISCHARGE a

z OF 1,555 CFS

_J--f------4------+- ~

0 u

w CJ) 1,000 .__--+----4 4-- ~ - - - I - - - - -

tl'.'.

I w

n.

1-1..Ll w

LL u

CD I 00 ~---+---+---+---+----1-----------1---+----1k----+---+-----+---1

J u

z

~

0

_J LL 1----'-_.......__.......__ _....__ _...____._--1r,_ ____.,________...._______

0.01 .I .5 2 10 30 50 70 90 98 99.5 99.9 99.99 PERCENT OF TIME INDICATED DISCHARGE WAS EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Flow Probability Curve For The Brazos River At Station 8-0910 Near Glen Rose FIGURE 2. 4-24

20,000---------------------.....---..----...-----...--

I0,000 1----+-1,---------l---------+----~---+---+---+---+-- ---+---+------1--------1 1,000 1 - - - - - - - - + - l l - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + - - - - + - - - - + - - - - - - - i - - - - - - - - ! - - - - + - - ~

a z

0 u

w en 0:::

w I00 1-------+---+---+-------"'------+----+------+---+---- - - - - - - - - + - - - - - , 1 - - - - - - 4 a..

~AVERAGE DISCHARGE 1-- 70.8 CFS w

w I.I...

u co u

z

=

0

..J lL O.l'----.....1...--1--.....1...--...._---i....--i....-...i....--.,___-__.L.-_"-_..i.....----1 0.01 .I .5 2 10 30 50 70 90 98 99.5 99.9 99.99 PERCENT OF TIME INDICATED DISCHARGE WAS EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Flow Probability Curve For The Paluxy River At Station 8-0915 Near Glen Rose FIGURE 2. 4-25

A B C D E F G H

\

JJ~ i

..,r:v. :1:.,;:;*,

J_ 2 3

I 4 .

~YA"'CPJ.. i,*;=-

05';.E'::

AMEIIDIIEl!T 87 DECE!IBER 18, 1992 6 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFE TY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 AND 2 ________,

8 C D t G L PLANT WATER SYSYTEM GENERAL: TWO UNI TS FIGURE 2.4-26 H

A B C

. --' D G 7

o*-> ~. c ~~~j
  • =;:,~

r 2

\

\

5 5

~87 CEll8ER l8. 1992 6 COMANCH FINAL SAFET yE ANA PEAK S.E *S

  • UNITS 1 A~YDS1S REPO~T

. 2 UNlfl~NT WATER SYSTEM UN IT 2 *I'. NORMAL OPERATION

- ORMAL 0 ?ERA Ti ON

_i 'IGURE 2,4*27 A B C D G H

A B C D

  • £ F H 19.682 1,000.000 EVAPORATIVE

1 LOSSES ANO SEEPAGE MAiN CONDENSERS NOTES

l. FLOWS lN GPM.

32,607 2. 9ZO GPM OURINC EMERGENCY TANK FILL MAKE-UP fROM LA~E GRANBURY 1,100.000 28,000 FROi..

SQUAW CREH A£SEA'IOIR ,....----1------------------------.------------4! f~d:iu** RESERVOIR 2

2 16,000 TURB PLANT SHUTDOWN 1 - - - -......-. COOLING WATER ' - - - - - ' IMPOUNDMENT HEAT EXCHANGER; OVf:RfLOW CANAL 260 ,-------------! AUXILIARY F£EOWATER PUMPS :s 12,882 SHUTDOWN IMPOUNDM£NT 0 (NOTE 2J MAKE. UP FIR£ 1 - - - - - - - - - 1 Pf<<)TE.CflON SYSTEM NON-RAO!OACT)VE PLANT l----,

4 FROM SAfE UQUlO WASTE SHUTDOWN EVAP0RATIV(

!MPOUNOMENT LOSSES 68,000 SANITARY WASTE TR£ATME,NT SERVICE  ::M!!RGENCY JJUER O!ESEL GEN PUWPS r'.EAT EXCH TO SQUAW CREEK RESERVOIR 12.5 MAli:E-UP 11 W4TER RECDVER8l Oil TR(AHAE.NT IOFFSlT(

WASTE O!SPOSAU 5

5 PLANT MAK( -U? OEM<NERAU ZED TO PLANT WATER WATER '-----< USE AS TREATMENT SYS STORAGE TANK NEEDED FROM ONSITE WATER WE'...LS MIEmEJITtfl 111Er:a11D 18, 1992 Fl~E GENERATED FOR FSAR ONLY 6

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. 6 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 AND 2 PLANT WATER SYSTEM UNIT 1- NORMAL OPERATIONS UNIT 2 - SHUTDOWN AT 4 HOURS IflG002428,DCN A B C D t E G H

A B D G NOTES MAL'J 1JLOW'.:, IN Gf-'M.

CONOf:_NSt.RS

2. 920 GPM DUR I NG EMERGENCY TANK FI LL.

~ PC 1,. t,

  • 1r11 WATER PLMPS ,--------+-----

2 2 CANAi 3 3 N-0N-RA010A', T1V~, 4 Pi..4.'H ,----,

L (lUIG 11,'A':. ll 1

FROl,I SAFE

';HI JT C, ~,'l'I~<

M;::ryJ*,nwc=_**J'

JANI TART ill'AS l!
. WA it.R

'lo'.STE I.IANJ.GEMENT TR~~Tl.lP*iT SlSTEIJ

~Al::E-UP WA TfP rnur1.1lNT WASTE 5 5 H.'.11-.:T ~Hf-11P (' C,EMl~JERAL 1z:::o', r~, PLM'T

'ffAll:J--1 WATER , - - - - - , \ JSE AS,,

TREATI.IENT SYS i ':-TORAGE TM~ j~N_E_Ec_rn _ _~* /'

1 I FROM \

ON'.:>' 1 t:

WA TEP Wlll ':,

I Al4£NDMEIIT III DECEMBER 18, 1992 f- 'GURl:. GlNl:.RA rc_D FOR FSAP ONLY 6 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. 6 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS I AND 2 PLANT WATER SYSTEM UNIT I - SHUTDOWN AT 4 HOURS UNIT 2 - LOCA AT RECIRC FIGURE 2.4-29 I , :cuU242J.DVN A B D G

N 0 20 MILES LEGEND

~ OUTCROP OF PALUXY AQUIFER COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

@ AREA WHERE AQUIFER IS CONFINED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 OUTCROP OF PALUXY FORMAT I ON REFERENCE The bose mop for this iltustro11on was prepared from portions of U.S.G S. quadrangle mops. for Abilene, Brownwood, Dallas and Waco.

FIGURE

0 ro 20 MIL£S

~ii""'!5iiiii!!!!5iiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~ ~~

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 OUTCROP OF GLErl ROSE FORMATION REFERENCE, The base map for this il!ustraf1on was prepared from portions of U,S G.S quadrangle mop5 for Abilene, Brownwood, Dallas and Waco.

FIGURE 2, 4-31

~ 5 O !!'."'iii~5iiiiii"""§iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!!I 0~!"!!"'!"!!"'!"!!"'~~!"!!"'~~20 MIL ES LEGEND

___,-roe-- ELEVATION CONTOUR COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

~ AQUIFER OUTCROP FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELEVATION TOP OF rnrn MOUNTAINS FORViATI ON REFERENCE The bose rr,ap tor th<s 1i!ustraflon wos pr,epa,ed from portions ot U.S.G.S. quodror,gle maps for Abilene, Brownwood, Dallas orid Waco. FIGURE 2, 4-32

0 10 20 MILES Wtll llffORMAiJO~ PRESL~TED IN ~il!"'5iiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~~~

TA8L£ 2.2-13

~ COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

-@- PUBLIC SUPPLY WELL FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ij INDUSTRIAL WELL UNITS 1 and 2

© IRRIGATION WELL PUBLIC SUPPLY, INDUSTEIAL

.~@ IRR! GATI ON WELLS R£FRE.NCE' The base mop for this il!u-stroHon was pre:po,e:d from portions of U,$,G,$, quadrangte maps for Abilene, 0 TO 2:J MILES Brownwood, Dellos and Waco.

FIGURE 2, 4- 33

0 10 20 MILES LEGEND COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

- 6 0 0 Pl EZOMETRIC SURFACE

,,.,- ELEVATION CONTOUR FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PlEZO:URJ C StJ'.<.FACE, TWIN MOUFAWS FORMATION, REFERENCE n,* bo .. mop !or tni* ,11u,1rohon wos propored from S!TE REG I Oil portions of U.S,G.S. quodrang!e maps for Abilene, Brownwood, Dallas ond Woco.

FIGURE 2,4-34

I 04~~

\

47/i

\

\

140 17A

~

15A 040 21A 0 II 10 0

330

</SITE 7

0.28 0.27 KEY 0 2MI.

0 DOMESTIC WELL A STOCK WELL 250 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 REFERENCE THE BASE FOR THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING U.S.G.S.

QUADRANGLE MAPS*

WATER WELLS, HILL CITY, 1961 S!TE VI CltHTY NEMO, 1961 FIGURE 2. 4-35

@SITE 0 2Mi, COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PIEZO!'.ETRIC SURFACE, REFERENCE THE BASE FOR THIS MAP WAS PREPARED TWIN MOUNTAINS AQUIFER, FROM THE HILL CITY, 1961, U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE SITE VICINITY FIGURE 2, 4-36

j N

-:::",-:-._ \(,...........,_ . .

I *

/2.p 08-3 0

\

z r:>

(/)

z

  • :i:::

.J:;

  • PW (CPSES Production wells)
  • OB (CPSES Observation wells)
  • S0-402 (TWDB Observation wells)

._ Plant Site 0 SCALE IN MILES 5 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOCATION OF PRODUCTION AND OBSERVATION WELLS FIGURE 2. 4-37

10 9

8 ---

7 ---

6 5 ---

4 ---

3 2 ---

0 0

0 0

Q ____

9 --

8_

7_

6 -- ~

u..

_J 5 _

_J w

Cl LO Cl.. I 3 4 __ ~ 0 Cl

...... ::E: ---~---~

w 0 Cl..

0 X ~

Cl..

E: 0
, 0 0 3 -- N 0 Cl.. ...... L() ......
E:

0 a::

u..

2 __

\ I- V) 0-I-

w w

u..

0 0

o_

0 9 -

8 -

7 6_

5_

4_

3 2 -

0 0

0 N

(133.:l) NMOOM\fHO COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DISTANCE-DRAWDOWN CURVES TRINITY SAND (TWIN MT,)

FIGURE 2. 4- 38

~

f!lt!Jllllli I 4Q ,..__.__...........__.._ 0BS ERV ATIO N WELL NO

  • 1 +--1-+-+--+--1f----+---+--+-+-+---+--+-+-1--+--+--+--11----+-+-+-+-+-+---i ~--+-+---+-4--+--+---,f-+-+--1--+--+----1--1--1--+-+--+-+---1-+---1---1--i-----..----1---1------' 4 Q g EL. 660 FT.

I [ i-,,...,-....i-,,...,...._..._. i.--- ..... - - ~I""-, ...... ~ -.

u.

o l-LL.

l---++~H---+++----1-+-+tiH++-l-----+-+++-+'-+-~~-~µ++-t--+++-H---+~+~-+--+-kt-+++-l-i+++----1+++-l--+++-t---++++-+--+----t--4---i--l--,-I I -~

3 u.1-

c ............ I O ,::_

l- ,.......  ::c a..

LJ..l 50 1----1--+-+-+---+---+-+----l--f--+-+---il-+-I-+-+-+-+--+-+-l---+--l--t-1---1--+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+--f-+-+--+---,f--+--+-+--l-+--t-+-,i--"1"-i- ...-+--f-+-+--+--,f-+-+--l--+--+--+-+--1---1---+--+--i---l--+-+--1 50 ~

C)

LJ..l 0:::

t I

- +-----','--+--+- -
  • i-19 0 1--1---+--+--+--+--+--+-+-----+- OBSERVATION WELL NO
  • 2 +*-+-.,-~-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+--+-+--+-+-+------+--+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+__.__+-+-+--+---+---.i-+--+,-+-++--+-+--+-+-++--+--1 19 0

--1 ~,- n-- o LJ..l

. .J...... ,...............

0:::

1-

<C EL. 831 FT. , ~i.,, ..... , j i I, I: Lu 1-3 ---- t--+--t-+----l-+--+--+-+--+-+--+-+----11f---+--+---+-t-+~~~~-+-~-+---t-1-+~'-+-i~r-.....-+......_-+-~~'.-..I:-:.~~~ ,~,~

  • I 1 <C LI.. iu.

--.:  ! ~  : ....- ,* -....... I I 3..---.

I I i--.:

~~~

0 LL.

I I 0 u..

200 l---+-+-+--+-+---+---l--+-+-+--+-+--+-+-+-ll-+---+--+--+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+--+--+-+--f---+-+-+--+-+--+-----1--11--+-+-+--+-+-+l~..... +-"'+-L+-+--+-+-!--+--!--+-+--'---+-l-+-+--.-1~--+--+-+---+-+-+~ 200

c I l-a.. :c .........

Lu l-a..

11ri-t-t-t-r--~-+-+--U-.L...L i Cl LJ..l

I , Cl I ]--+-+-+-

1 1 I  ! I I I l 210 l---+--+-+-+-+-1-1---11-+---+-+--+-I-+-+-+;-+-ll-+---+--+---4-----+---+-+--+-+-+----+--+--+-+--'-1-+-+--+-+--+-+----+-f-+--+-+---+--+-+-+-+-+-+--+------+---l--+-~+-+--+--l-+--~i-+---+-+~210

-f-i . n-,ttt+/--1-H-31 1

OBSERVAT ION WELL NO.

H - 1 ,~ ' -

t ... ,-

~I,_i-,,...._..__~ ..... *-*- ___t-1----t-11~1H-+-"'-l--.C.

j *

-*11 --** . - -7I ---' ' - "1 0- t-i-0:::

c I.LI ...........

n--- , , .

L- ---

CL <C I-I.LI 3: LL.

EL. 890 FT. -

nTrn:Trrn,rrn,~n,rrnTrrnTr:

Cl u.. -

220 rrn:!: n--r:+-T, r-r-n~ff+:f'=F+:+~:t:P::J:tct:=---m 1 1 1 0

220 1

, ~

I  ; I I. I I I I 90 J-..-l---1--4--+-~-+--+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+--+--l-+---+--1----1-+--+--1--+--1-_._+---+-+-+-+-+-f--l---+-.......+---+--+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+--+----+--+-+-___,--+-+--l-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-1--1 I 90

! i I I 1 1 1 1

1

--l--+--l--+-+--1-+--+-+--+-+--t--+--+--+--lf-+l-+-+--l--+-+-~+---1-,.--+--+-+--t--+-~

ii 11,,~~I '

~~-+-.-+--<f-+--1--+-'---+---+--+-+--t---+--+-+-l-+--+-~l-+-~+--+-+--+-+-,jc--+--l-+-+--l--l 1

i r,,....i'-.,._ I I 1

i OBSERVATION W:EL L NO. 4 ;~ j i 200 l--+--+---+---1---------+--+--+--+--+--+----+----+--+---........i---+--+-- EL. 84 8 FT. 200 11

+-+---l-+--+--+--+--+---+--+--+'l,\....+----,---+-4-+-+-+-1--"--+--+--+---+-+----+---+--+-+---+--<--+---,-+----+--+----l 1--1----+-~+-+'-+-+-+--+-+--+-I'._ ,! __ +_ f----+~-+----+- L~-1---+-:. . . . . 1 ----1-- . '*--+---+--*-""*-1k\""l"<<*-f----*t---*l*** I ... ' I I 1

2I O l--i--+--l--+--l---+----1---+---4-- -+--+--+l-+--+----!--+-.,..._.__+---t---1------+--+--+---i----+--+--+-+-+-+-+---l----f--+--i--,'--+-'l-----+--+--+--+-+*..:>"1--\-+-+'-+-+--+-+~1--+--+--+-+---+--+-+--+--+--+--+--+---+-+-+--1 2I0 1

i I I i I I \.

I / I ' 1I I '11 i  !

l I Ii I'

_iL__ I  ! I I I 220 LLJ_J__J_.J_J__LJ___LJ_J__j____.__j_j__J_J--!-_l__l~_J__LJ.__J_.J_J_LJ__LJ_J_JLL__J__L_J_J~L.J__LJ_LL_L-!-J~~~~~~~_..,_..,J..~-L._j___L_L_I I i i 220 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER 1975 COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 HYDROGRAPH OF OBSERVATION WELLS FIGURE 2. 4-39

Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2 .390 6

COMANCHE PEAK S E.S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PLOT PLAN DRAINAGE DITCHES LAYOUT FIC'.o(.JfiE 2 ,4 - 4 0 A 8 C I., i i E F G

Information Withheld in Accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 6

COMANCHE PEAK S.E S.

FNAL SAFETY AN.AlYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PLOT PL AN DRAINAGE DITCHES L AYOUT flQ,Jl( 2-~- 4 1 B C D f

- - -- --~-

,I.ju. (p'-o' *4*

(,~ t ,: f~N~i:;"f' .~(_(-, *, ,,,- f~p t ----*~;'t~---*- ~-~-~~--~l~-~~ ..I..,... ~--*!:

....-...,..,,~--i t

,~

t~b" \\/(X)fl ~K;~~L_j

_tA.d~ PF' c~~lr WALL _ _ ___.

1011 w... 100

" <~A~),.....,_,~

IA:1A.L OF FLA'!IH!h4 PLAN

......--------~JW":-"'7'---

0P'Si"'-l l Ne; SECTION i

1 T.?P 0F CG-i"'tC,

~ L.A e,.,

( \.. .)

-t>l!ttJIZ.E "1TTER "It? ~G.,,_,..C JULY 31, 1979 B.LOC.Kt t--l <:, A.S.

eel'Qo.

COMANCH~ PEAK S.E.S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ELEVATION UNITS 1 and 2 ROOF DRAINS DETAIL OF RELIEF AND DRAINAGE OPENING FIGURE 2. 4-42

0

-f_;~ o<'

--~

eslon Eagle Poss SCALE IN MILES 0 50 100 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2

REFERENCE:

RAISZ, ERWIN, 1957, 11 LANDFORMS OF THE UNITED STATES PHYSIOGRAPHY FIGURE 2.5.1-1

Approximate

/J)

Ero Sy5tem Serie* Group Strntigrophic Units Thickness Character of Rocks 0 1/) (Feet)

C

0

()

0 g

Ouoternory - - - 0-100 Silt, 1ome 1and ond grovel l'l Cenozoic Tertiary - - Not PreHnl in Sile Region -

-l l>

Cl-0 1/)

Navarro 0-550 t 0-1100+/-

Shale, marl and sand

.. Mori and limy shale

)(

"O Taylor 0 0 C.

Austin 0-600 +/- Chalky limestone
E 0 Gulf D
, Eagle Ford 0-300 .+/- Shale

~ 0 (Upper 0

3 Cretoceoui Woodbine 0-200'+/-

Ferruginous sand, sandstone, shale, sandy shale, clay and some lignite and gypsum 0

Buda Formation 0-50 +/- Limestone 3 Del Rio Formation 0-100+/- Shale

~ Washita 0

to Georgetown formation 0-150:t Limestone 0

_o..

-0 Kiomichi 0-50 +/-

Hord, fossiliferous limestone (often honey-Edwards Formation 0-175+/- combed), reel material, sh ale, chert and

"' Fredericks-burg dolomite Cretaceous Comanche Peak Formation 0-150+/- Limestone and limy shale Mesozoic Walnut Formation 0*200 +/- Shale and calcareous clay t-,ne to medium grained sand, shale, Paluxy Formation 0-200.:!: .,, sandy and calcareous shale, some C pyrite and iron nodules

< * ~ l e n Rose Formation 0-1500+/- ..

0 Limestone, shale and anhydrite Comanche

~

0

- Conglomerate, fine to coarse

~

(Lower grained sand, sandstone, si It-0-175+/-

..0 stone, shale, sandy shale, clay, K"

Creto ceous) Hensel member C

0 Cow Creek +I 0 C

limy cloy and limestone 0 member 0-130:!: u 2 Shale inter- Limestone E Pears al I "'0 -

00

!; .," bedded

'T1 Trinity C 0 ...

0 member Hammett member -+i 4l 0 0-140+/- c;: -

E with sand Shale

o 0 -.,

f1'1 z)> E C

N 0

a) ~

C

,, G)

..... r

(")

0 0

lL i:":,

~ Sligo member N

0 0 0-1 30:t C

0

..! Limestone ci 0 z .; :;f 0

.,,~ -;

0 C (/) ~ ..

0 m
t::-

r )> )> -r,)::,,

ro 3 C

  • '~= "C C

£ Sand a,,d Conglomerate, C

(./')

z

'Tl m z rr ro

<( I- Sycamore 41 0 0 0, 4.n t

0 conglomer* fine to coorse-

-i - -I (") member 0 ate with sand ond sand-N Ul

~

-i

(/)

-< Im

)>

C ll> 3 0..

ro 0..

0 Hosston member V) 0-0 1550+/- o-

~ _§ o-u 0

~

E 0)

C 0

calcareous cement, shale and stone, siltstone, shale, sandy and calcareous. shale,

.....I G) ---4 z -u u, c+ *:;:" 0

~-" "0 ,i u

limestone cloy and limestone

)> ~

~ OJ m ~

en I- "

C I> C N

~ ....... 0

i LL ';

)> ...... </)

I: Q_ (/) :;;i;:

(/)

\.0 co Cotton  ?  ?

n N co Jurassic Valley Sands, conglomerate and shale

(/)

n :0 0 m m Pennsylvanian Mineral Wells Formation 0-601: Shale wiH limestone seams and layers r -u Shale, limestone, dolomite, sandstone, C 0 (/) Paleozoic Most of Paleoro,c rocks undlfferentla led, Including Ouachita Facies  ? evoporites., and metamorphics 3: :0

z -;

\ ARKANSAS ANDARKO ~/~~ASIN BASIN

  • HARDE MAL.

BASIN r

0 I

INE S:

CJ)

~ UPLIFT

\ !

~

Ll.

..J w 1, '**

I:

1411 (I) z cc w

....u,

<(

w UPLIFT

~~

ct

,_"f-~'o

~~*KERR BASIN

~~

\~--1/

0

- - -AMENDMENT 7 l00 IIO JULY 31, 1979

  • ALSO KNOWN AS "STRMN BASIN" COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

SOURCES:T*ctonic Mop of Tu,n, G*ologicol Highway Jhp FI\IAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT of Tuos, Dollu G*olo9icol Socl*ty, 1963.

Tectonic Mop of th* Mid-Co.,tifl*nt R*gioi,, UNITS 1 and 2 GHlogico! Highway Mop of th. Mld-Contli,ent Region, A.A.,:>,G., 1966 Modified with data REGIONAL TECTONIC STRUCTURE from Turner (Ref. 129)

LEGEND Scaie in Kiles QU~TERNARY Qt Recent 50 100 Qp ~ Pleistocene TERHAR¥ Tp - Pliocene undiv.

Tm-To Miocene-01igocene undiv.

T:; - Eocene, Jackso.n Tel - Eocene, C1aiborne T;m,,, - Eocene, 1'1'1dway-Wilcox MESOZOIC AME1~DMENT 2 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

Ku K:

tipper Cretaceous lower Cretaceous. JULY 27, 1978 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PALEOZOIC P Pet'11ian UNITS 1 and 2 Pennsylvanian

~ Missippian-Cambrian PR£-CAM8~!AN p - Igneous and me-tamorphics REGIONAL GEOLOGY FIGURE 2.5.1-4

  • 3000 YOUNG I

I STCPHENS Ni P1NTO

\

I MC LENNAN Seal liflMt-.1 L 1-ae ae JO

=1 BELL LLMO WILLIAMS()tj

\

AMENDMENT 7 JULY 31, 1979 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT REFER TO FIGURE 2.5.1-23 FOR DETAILED UNITS 1 and 2 ELLENBURGER IN THE SITE VICINITY.

ELLENBURGER STRUCTURE MODIFIED AFTER: TURNER (REF.129)

FIGURE 2.5.1-4a

A A' LOVING WINKLE_R ( C TOR COr-_f RUNNfl 12,000 10,000 8,000

'\,l'," 1 B :,

6,000 I-l&J w 4,000 IL

~

I.I.I

...J LOCATION OF CROSS*SECTION cl SEA 0

"'...J cl

....Q:~

l&J 4,00

_, All ~

I A' I

I CALLAHAN I cASTLANO w

I u

2 (RATH 0

0 0

I w

IX w

IJ 1g l JOHNSON El L 15- KAUFMA?-. Vl:,,N ZANDT $Mi TH woou

z Ir z

0 a

0

"'oc- I 7

0

(!C CJ 1~

V)

  • ~ SANDSTONE

[Hlttl SALT 0

u r  ;:.

0 II l

<c

<t re

<l I

<t '- ~

1':;

- - SHALE METAMORPHOSED ROCKS 12,000

~¢;]* DOLOMITE 10,000 f 0 8,000 U~~~~~zj LIMESTONE ~ NORMAL FAULT SITE 6,000 I-

~

u.l l&J IL ANHYDRITE THRUST FAULT 4,000

(, ..t;,.

2,000 u.l

...J io o 4() ~Q cl SEA 0 r-::-:::-i  ;;:j (I)

LEVEL ...J PAT :ON ?OX cl 2,000 u I-Q:

4,000 u.l 6,000 AMENDMENT 7 JULY 31, 1979 e,ooo 10,000 COMANCHE PEAK E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 MODIFIED AFTER: Geo1ogica1 Highway Map of Texas, The American Association of REFER TO FIGURES 2.5.2-30 AND 2.5.1-31 REGIONAL EAST-WEST Petroleum Geologists, 1973, FOR CROSS SECTIONS IN SITE VICINITY. GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION FIGURE 2.5.1-5

MONTAGUE IWISE\ JACK I PALO PINTO I ERATH !HAMILT()NI MILLS ILAMPAi BURNET BLANCO s

N PROJECTED SAS MUENSTER *FORT IIORTH TUSI SITE LAMPASAS LLANO OUACHITA BA..CJIN ARCH UPLIFT FRONT ARCH 0

t.a e -2000 -2000 ?i1-1 z

1-1 ~

~

-4000 -4000 tn

-6000 -6000 E

~

H

z:

H >wJ

! -8000 -8000 g

-10,000 -10,000 SCALE IN MILES VERTICAL BXAGGZRATIClf 40X

.->aTH-IOUTB GEOI.001C SECTION M0IITMlm QAlll'ff-PI IJICO COUifl i I TEXAS "TI MUBNS'rD AIICll TBN)(JG11 LLUIO UPLIFT z

)> ('") *ALSO DIOIIII AS STRAIIN BASDI Tl c5 ~  ::0 ro C...

C om CJ) ~ C:3;:

0 r- rrn m

s-

-~

Ci)

C z

)> )>

"TI m nz

-<Z W:3:

CJ INIJEX STRUCTURAL MAP DATUM: TOP ELLENBURGER N

u, n~

n

-i CJ)

~I

)> m

~

~

~

JTI z

-j CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1000 FT.

MKlDIPil:D FIOt TURNER (M:F .129) i3

.....I V, ~ ..... z "'O

\.0 --..J

--..J

~~

0 V, --i Q) \.0 0\ :x :J MODIFIED FROM FIGS 8 AND 14, V, I Q..

fT1 V, no N

~ r- TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD, APPIWJXIMATE REPORT 157, VOL.l, 1972 SCALE

! =i
x
0 V>

mm 0

z a
0 CJ)

DPD TO PIOODS 2.5.l-4a AND 2.5.1-23 TBIIJ 2.S.l-31 POa MORE 0 SONI.

-i DBTAILJ!D STltOCTUU MPS

DENSITY FORMATION LITHOLOGY 2,2 2.4 2.6 2.8

,_; 0 ~O..!.;"' shale, green, sticky, orogonite concretions a: w MIDWAY FM . *=*.:-;. shale, buff-colored, papery wit~ sandy lamination w

...J

< *-'=

0 - and concretions shale sand on d louconi!ic a.

shale, gray, sticky sandstone and sondy shale NAVARRO GROUP sticky with sond lentils TAYLOR GROUP chalk, white, hard

u. shale, $andy

..J

, shale, dork marly, fossiliferous ray, calcareous, fossl liferous AUSTIN GROUP ite; marl with glouconite d chalk one EAGLE FORD GROUP s shale

"'::, stone an sandstone strea s ot bose 0

w green, bentonitie; shale, red u WOODBINE GROUP brown & white, shaly partings w shale, gray-black, calcareous with limestone Q:

u W.\SHITA GROUP stringers, oolitic, dense FREDERICKSBURG G. shale, black, calcareous; limestone, fossi !iferovs sandstone, with re bed$ & minor s a e PALUXY FM. t e c lcareous w sandstone

c sondstone & si Its tone with shaly p<>rtings u sandstone, calcareou* and sihy z

< GLEN ROSE FM. sond,tone with anhydrite and limestone stringers

I: anhydrite, mottled, pure, mas$ive 0

u limestone, oolitic, sandy, shaly

$andstone, colcareous, shaly aly, oss, i erous groy; sholy sandstone TRAVIS PEAK FM.

(TWIN MTSJ basal conglomerate with chert pebbles shale, red, green & gray, waxy COTTON VALLEY FM mudstone, varicolored u shale with dense limestone stringers & minor vi V') anhydrite

°'-,

BUCKNER FM.

shale, maroon, red with anhydrite, salt & silty sandstone strln ers I imeston& brown is gray, cry sta i ne, 1

SMACKOVER LS. fossiliferous, dolomite stringers NORPHLET-LOUANN" redbeds, evaporites, conglomerates EAGLE MILLS FM.? shaie and redbeds, arenaceous shole 1 limestone, dolomite, sandstone, evopori!es, OUCHITA FACIES and metomorph ic rocks Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 SOURCE: Crosby, 1971 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ROCK DENSITY VARIATION WITH DEPTH FIGURE 2.5.1-7

M A I. C u I .\1 E X 0 F IJ SCALE

'" r.J:LES COMANCHE PEAK S.ES.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 REGIONAL BOUGUER GRAVITY MAP FIGURE 2.5.1-8

~

0 I\

~

0 0

0 I

fi' 0

,fl ,

,/

\

\

I

{ INDEX MAP DENTON COUNTY, 1

co. ':

,, \o)'

,, 5'> EXPLANATION

\ Q I~

\

\ \ 400. 600 Aerorodioocti vi ty belt

\ \

' 450- Narrow band of high or low oeroradioocti vi ty.

600 Solid where well defined; dashed where not well defined. Boundaries not drawn through areas of poody defined levels.

Numbers indicate general range of aero*

radioactivity levels in counts per second.

/

/

.I' I

\

I I

I I I 0

~

I I I I ~

')

I ci I

0 0

'l;f, 0

IQ It) l ' %J ,

SOURCE: From Geophysical Investigations 0 \ hj Mop GP-696, by U.S.G.S. in cooperation 0 l'Q

? ' ' 'I

'I with Division of Biology and Medicine, U.S.

Atomic Energy Commission, 1970

\

\

\ I \ i' I I

I

/

,' g I

1")

o,

g \

, \

\

\

-- .,,, I "J

, I' J

0

%1 I

I

/

/

I I

I

ERATH ',COUNTY ILL CO. ELLIS I COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

0 10 15 20 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 REGIONAL NATURAL GAMMA AERORADIOACTIVITY FIGURE 2. 5.1-9

LEGEND ALLUVIUM QUATERNARY TERRACE EDWARDS LIMESTONE COMANCHE PEAK LIMESTONE LOWER CRETACEOUS WALNUT FORMATION PALUXY SAND Kgr GLEN ROSE LIMESTONE OE SOTO OIL CO.

S.W. WANN NO. I f5tl~ 9 ofPTH 50112 co**

DRY a ABANOONEO 8119/5Z I

Kgr "

CO**

r:;;~~! 0

! ~im O 2 :3 Ml.

~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Siiaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii;;;;;;;;;;;l,!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I 4

i Kpx .

AMENDMENT 2 JULY 27, 1978 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PLYMOUTH (M.E. DAVIS)

T.H. COUSINS NOi f5t:L 0 if..PTH 6&!0 co**

DRY II ABANDCJIED 11/23.'4! VICINITY GEOLOGIC MAP FIGURE 2.5.1-10

LOC.Al GEOLOGIC:

COLUNI TYl"I CAL  ! .. n,1cAL THICKNESS IN FEET I.. ; =

...: THICKNESS IN f'EET QVATt*~A*Y 30

<l*I (lt K*d ALLUVIAL DEl"OSITS ALLUVIAL TERAAC£S EDWARDS LIM£STOM£ i

! I

.:: JI

...s u

1 Boo

]I ......

C I

100 Kcp CO~CHE PEAK LIMESTONE

~

I

C u

...... r--.....- --

l X

WALNUT FORMATION (SHALE)

':t 100 Kw*

I J I 100 Kpx PALUXY SAND  ! :;; ~

,,,. ...3 ~ i.aoo

.... I. LIHESTONE AND SHALE ~ >

~

-0 z

OR CLAYSTONE LOW£*

CRETACEOUS I 80-90

-- ----- J

  • II. MASSIVE LIHESTONE '-lw z

..,z CL.

~;1 ... ~

vt:i CCMlNCM£ II 60-70 LIMESTONE ANO SHALE HRl£S GLEN ltOSE

-- ~---- ) Kgr LI ME STONE I 111. Olt CLAYSTONE; 0-1 o., ...

..., ;i 111 60-65 MASSIVE LIMESTONE ...~"' g I

-- ~---- IV. LIMESTONE ANO SHALE C 0..

ii I IV 30-40 j OR CLAYSTONE "'

f ,:.. .... --

~

i jl w

,w ..,

i l+OO

=' --

Ktm TWIN MOUNTAINS SANDSTONE 250

.. z C

i I '-l

~

j g 2500 c:,

PENNSYLVANIAN t'

1 SERIES Pmw MINERAL WELLS CLAYSTONE STRAWN

- (65 FEET OF THIS FORMATION PENETRATED IN SITE BORINGS)

TII

~i :;;i.;:

w u 111 1tE*CAf11 NOT TO SCALE Amendment 67 KEY: x EXPOSED FORMATION WITHIN 5 KILES OF SITE February 5, 1988

.t. STATION SITE POSITION COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOCAL GEOLOOIC COLUMN FGJIIE 2

  • 5 . 1- 11

\

\ '

J

\ I  !

\ I I I

I

\\ I I {

I I I

I I r l l I

I I I I I r

I I \ I I I \ I I I

\

\

I

'\

\ I I

I

\ I \ I

\ I r

\ Kgr I I

( I

\

\ t I

\ I I

\ I I f I

\ I I I

'.._,_ I I

,;,',...., ,, / 1 I

' ,, / {

',.,... I I

I I

I I

I I

Qal I I

I I

I t

,....,,.,. J Kgr I

I Kpx Kgr

(

i \

/

I (

l_)

I PEAK S.E.S.

I I I COMANCHE NALYSIS REPORT I I FINAL SAFETY A d 2

/ / UNITS 1 an Kpx ,_,

I ,;

SITE GEOLOGIC MAP

!GOO ENDMENT 87 AM DECEMBER 18, 1992 2.5.1-12

c GAMMA l-o.. RES ISTI VITV RAY Li.I Cl 0

I ZONE I 50 UPPER 58 LOWER 74 u.J z:

0 100 I-V, ZONE II u.J

E

..... I

...J 139 150 ZONE IIIA I 158 200 201 ZONE IV I

233 CJ) z

-z 250

~ ~ ...........--.---.....

z 1- TWIN MOUNTAINS

J <t FORMATION 0~

~ 0::

~~

~

I- L - - - - - L - - L . . __ _ J __ ____.__ __.294 300 0 40 80 0 100 200 300 400 (COUNT/SEC/IN) (OHMS PER INCH)

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT BASED ON BORING P-10 UNITS 1 and 2 LITHOLOGIC SECTION Amendment 67 AT PLANT SITE February 5, 1988 FIGURE 2. 5, 1-13

Water Well N~Bt;v Son to Fe RR

-~

~

Cleburne I

  • 011 test - Dr Y ond abond oned L.rne of Section - -

Note* Borin revealed gs at CPSES f cloystone vonoble ( quantities 0

shale) wI*th* instead of in the GI limestone en Rose and T

  • tains for . wm Moun*

motion PALUXY SAND Elev 7 71 _

Elev. 70S _

Elev. 6 46 _

Elev. 61S _

,, ~per Water Sand

.c a.

z

)> ("') 0

'1)

(./) ro *-

-I (j') ~

(./) ~ C )> )> ..., )::>

(=Trinity or Trav1s. p

...... -I

-I ....... z rii z ro cr ro 3 Lower Water Sand 0f water eok Sand well drillers) mm - -I ("') -s

~ -I -< I C. 0.

I Ol <)::,,

.... -0 (J') )> m p., 3

.....I n...........

c _.z -s ro

'< ::I

..... OJ )> 7J ,.+ TO 508 WELLS

-r::,.

z<>  :::i ~ m <.Tl TO !l!H7 TO 4!104 Q. (j') )>

~ O'\ TOIU!l

-.I N (/) 7' .,_.

I.D

JJ (j') CD a rn m*
JJ (J) co 0 10 15 t<ORIZONTAL SCALE IN MILES 20

-I

ll 230, ooo

~

--,. ,. ' trso.

      • ~

..... ___ _,660

--*-670

soO \

~

AMENDMENT 87 DECEMBER 18, 1992 LEGEND: 1 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

e BORING LOCATIOH , FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

,,,. - -. BEDROCK CONTOURS UNITS 1 and 2

~ G'OUNO SURFACE COPURS VICINITY BEDROCK CONTOUR MAP 0 IOOOFT FIGURE 2.5.1-15

G

- 72)

/

Information Withheld in' Accordance with 10C FR 2 .390 J

I COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 NATURAL GAS AND OIL DJPELINES AND WELLS WITHIN FIVE MIL ES OF C:P~F~

FIGURE 2 . 5 . 1- 17

><00D ANO SOMl AV( l l COUNTI ES, TEXAS SC ALE +N I tE 1

  • O~ ...

~ - *O:QL__ $~ - *000 Cl(Cf;M8[1'{ 31, 1100 111tv , u G, T[XAS H.J GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

N A 0 oo

10. _,.--,---,....~1.0° 90° NUMBER OF SEGMENTS MEASURED -o 5 10 15 20 25 30 - 900 DIRECTIONS AND FREQUENCIES OF STRAIGHT STREAM SEGMENTS w IN LOWER HALF OF PALUXY BASIN E N

B 900 w NUMBER OF FRACTURES MEASURED - 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 E 900 STRIKES AND FREQUENCIES OF STRUCTURAL TRENDS IN LOWER HALF OF PALUXY BASIN COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

Reference:

Howell, 1967, Unpublished senior thesis, Bay,lor University. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 RELATIONSHIP OF STREAM CHANNEL ALIGNMENTS TO STRUCTURAL TRENDS IN LOWER PALUXY BASIN FIGURE 2 , 5, 1-18

A' I I I

-+*-*-*+-*-*-i*

. . i AREA MAP AREA COVERED BY THIS FIGURE A

0 25 50 Miles 1!!!!!5iiiiiiiiii1!!!!5iiiiiiiiil~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~

A Meridian -

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT SOURCE: Boone, P., 1963 UNITS 1 and 2 PRE-CRETACEOUS PALEOTOPOGRAPHY FIGURE 2.5.1-19

0 K L A H O MA

~ No swelling, granitic Q Low swelling, little or thin montmorillonite

~ Medium swelling, montmorillonite cloy High swelling, montmori llonite cloy 0 100 200 MILES COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Modified ofter Corter,' The Soils of Texas',

Texos Agric. Exper. Sta. Bulletin No. 431, 1951.

DISTRIBUTION OF EXPANSIVE SOILS FIGURE 2.5.1-20

PRESSURE IN LBS / SQ. FT.

0 8 g

.01

,02 u

~

(./)

UJ a ,03

5 z:

0

,04

~

\:

Ei \

(./)

z: \

8 .05

,06 DEPTH DRY DENSITY BORING MOISTURE CONTENT FEET LBS/FT3 P-lOA 265.2 105,4 13,4 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA FIGURE 2,5,1-21

U !STING GROUND SORfACt 800 '-

GLEN ROSE LIMESTONE 750 ,_ lltT UNIT WEIGHT

  • 155 LS./FT. 3 700 -

EL.670' l..!'. EXISTING PIEZOMETRIC LEVEL IN THE TW!N MOUlffAINS FORMATION 650 ,_

Et.610'-

600 ~ ASS UMPTl Cl;S

.....,.., TWIN MOUNTAINS FORMATION l. WATER LEVEL IN GLEN ROSE LIMESTONE

.... WET UNIT WEIGHT

  • 135 LBS./FT. 3 REMAINS CONSTJ\llT AT EL. HD' *
"; 2. P!EZOMETRlC LEVEL IN THE Tl/IN l>KJUNTAINS 550 ~ FORMATION DROPS FROM EL.670' TO EL.SO',

~

160'

~

POINT A LAYER l El .530' 500 -

450 ~ l..!'. P!EZOMETRIC LEVEL AFTER ASSUMED DRAWOOWN 400 '-

150' LAYER 2 350 ~

300 L---------------------------....L-SETTLEMENT CALCULATIONS USE THE fOLll)\,/JNG EQUATION:

Where S

  • Settlement 1n feet H
  • Layer of thickness 1n feet Cc~ Slope of conso1idation curve on strain vs log pressure plot

? 1 f= Effective stress after drawdown in psf P' = Effective stress before drawdown in psf 0

~ filLl Di vi de Twin Mountains two 1ayers anC find Calculate settlement in each la.yer effer.tiv~ stresses in layer at midpoint (A & B) 3;!~*

1 At~ P' 0 * (200' + (80' x !J5 lb/ft3) - Layer l S * (160')(,034) lo910 (~ 0,55

{140 X

  • 33,064psf P' f * (200' x 155 1h/ft3 ) + (80 x 135 ]b/ft3)
  • 41,800 psf Layer 2 s* (150')(.034) Lona l~~:iU1,o,61 At _11, P' 0 * (200' X 155 + (225' X 135 1b/ft3) - TOTAL SUBS !DENCE 1.16' (295 62.4 42,964psf X

Ai1ENDMENT 4 JAtWARY 31. 1979 P' f * (200' x 155 lb/ft3) + (150' , 135 1b/ft3) +

{75 (135 lb/ft3. 62.4 lb/ft3)l *56,695psf COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SUBSIDENCE CALCULATION FIGURE 2,5,1-22

l r

I COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 lEGENO Ellenburger-Structure Map PRODUCING GAS WELL

  • PRODUCING OIL WELL ORY ANO ABANDONED WELL FIGURE 2.5.1-23 PERMITTED LOCATION NL NO LOG ONP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SCALE IN FEET 32000 0 32000 64000 4189' TOP OF STRUCTURE (SUBSEA) y ***-......- ... t

I I I

/

I I

I

\

\\

r,

[

LE6£Nfl lenburger-Structure Map PRODUCING GAS WELL DRY All!() ABANDONED WELL PLUGGED WfLL JULY 27, 1978 FiGURt 2.5. f;:23a PERMITTED LOCATION CONTOUR INTERVAL* 100 FEET NI. NO LOG ONP 010 NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES, TEXAS

-4!J$2' TOP OF STR*,CTURE (SUBSEAl NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1- And aooc, SCALE IN FEET o aooo Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections A-A' And 8-8 1

, pectively MAY, 1978

"*V'il'il""---- ...

LINE OF CROSS SECT,ON,, DALLAS, TD.AS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC

- l.

-4000

/

,)91*

\ .fli

\

\

! \

c;o-¢

\

.,,fl/  ;. I

.I§ Z, ~ ,' f>I f 0 r

  • , qov -

';", ~9 ~e~ -, _ : />,,

~*- "",..,' *,#;;-<. . .

p39(>Q , ., >~ .is**.,,

  • l .

-~~;t.,j:)

)9

'JSO(y

--~ .

\

-\

I

.****\'\,,'.

\

\

\'

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 I

LEGEND Marble Falls-Structure Map D PRODUCING GAS WELL DRY AND ABANDONED WELL 0 PLUGGED WELL AMENDMENT 2 FIGURE 2

  • 5. 1-2 4 PERMITTED LOCATION JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 100 FEET NL ONP NO LOG 010 NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SOMERV~LL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES. TEXAS SCALE IN FEET

-3841' TOP OF STRUCTURE (SUBSEAI

_NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And 8000 Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections MAY, 1978

~-=-0 8000 16000 LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS A-A And B-B ResoectivP.lv 1 1

  • DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

+

20N INl 8 00 0 0 8,000

~

16,000 24,000 S CALE: lii'-==--==----c::===1----

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 NOTE: Marble Falls Structure THE GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION REPRINTED HEREIN rs THE PROPERTY OF THE GEOMAP COMPANY. AND AMENDMENT 16 Geo Map HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM THEIR MAP NO. MBFL- MARCH 31, 1981 T29A, Horizon A, (Notice 1/23/81). FIGURE 2.5.1-24 0

\

.: I Ii N: ,..: I Ne f-----_L_~'-'!i_

QlvL

/II(.

-t ;c

., :t<J.. -.~

r COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 I

V Marble Falls-Net Hydrocarbon LEGEND v PRODUCING GAS WELL Isopachous Map DRY AND ABANDONED WELL FIGURE 2.5.1-25 0 PLUGGED WELL 0 PERMITTED LOCATION AMENDMENT 2 CONTOUR INTERVAL* 10 FEET NL NO LOG JULY 27, 1978 SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES, TEXAS ONP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SCALE IN FEET E6' NET THICKNESS OF PlllY NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 and 8000~1"1~!'Jii"'"l~~O~~iiiiiiii~8000~~"1iiiiiiiiiiiiil~6000 Figure 2.5.1-31 for Cross Sections MAY, 1978 LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS A-A 1 and B-8 1 ' respectively. DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

\ i N,

~~, ~::,

It.'\, "

~ >>~ I

\ 1--r

\

\ J,~

-J

\ ~,

\I

\ J, COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 I

LEGEND Big Saline-Structure Map

-0 PRODUCING GAS WELL 0 ORY ANO ASANOONEO WELL 0 PLUGGED WELL AMENUMEIH 2 FIGURE 2.5.1-26 c, PERMITTED LOCATION JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL= 100 FEET NL NO LOG DNP OIO NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES. TEXAS SCALE IN FEET

-$652' TOP OF STRUCTURE (SUBSEA) NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 and 8000 0 8000 16000 Figure 2.5.1-31 for Cross Sections MAY, 1978

~.+/--:':---***- iii]

LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS A-A 1 and B-8 1 , respectively. DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

COMANCHE PEAKS.ES.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LEGEND Big Saline-Net Hydrocarbon PRODUCING GAS WELL Isopachous Map ORY ANO ABANDONED WELL FIGURE 2.5.1-27 PWGGED WELL AMENDMENT 2 PERMITTED LOCATION JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL* 10 FEET NL NO LOG ONP 010 NOT PENETRATE MAPPEO HORIZON SOMERVE;LL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES, TEXAS SCALE IN FEET 15' NET THICKNESS OF PAY NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And 8~&:::: 8000 16000 Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections MAY, 1978 LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS A-A' and B-8 1 , Respectively DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.


i

.I

/

\

COMANCHE PE Jl.K S. E. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS *1 and 2 LEGEND Strawn-Structure Map PRODUCING GAS WELL DRY ANO ABANDONED WELL PLUGGED WFLL AMrnDMEIH 2 FIGURE 2.5.1-28 PERMITTED LOCATION JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL, 100 FEET NL NO i..OG SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUl"-JTIES, TEXAS DNP OiO NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON

  • 1980' 10P OF STRUCTURE (SU8SEA) rWTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And 8000 SCALE IN FEET 0 8000 ,6000 Figure 2.S.1-31 For Cross Sections WaV"'>>1 - .  !

A-A' and 8-t3' , Resµect i ve ly MAY, 1978 DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC _ _ J

---*-*- LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS

I ,.,:

0 NL 0 N, _l_

NL1, NL 1---}

r COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 I

Strawn-Net Hydrocarbon

..!:..f.6£NO PRODUCING GAS WELL Isopachous Map

>RY AND ABANDONED WELL FIGURE 2.5.1-29 0 PLUGGED WELL AMENDMENT 2 0 PERMITTED LOCATION JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL* 10 FEET NL NO LOG DNP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD C8UNTIES, TEXAS SCALE IN FEET 43' NET THICKNESS OF PAY 1~0TE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And aooo~P'I~~~~o~~iiiiiiiiiieooo~~~~l6000 Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections MAY, 1978 LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS A-A' and B-~ Respectively 1

, DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCl~TES, INC.

LOCAL GEOLOG,C NORTHWEST SOUTHEAST COLUI.'!',

A A'

'J '... COAP MID *CO~-..;Nf;,.T PfTRfJ,_('.JM CORP "fHE BARON CO M E OAVlS Mcit<if:;1h No Sauo"" ,: eeli ,:,,ctLi, No! *B Ne*¢:/\ No \ T 11 Cousm1

... oh11 Ect1<1is SJt'HY SOW£RYE:.;o ~~~tp' ru AS

)<1tf LMj<;fJ 1-1>4-B~St: L0WE"1. CA:ETACEOL.:S SJO '.1-1

'S

~I I l C) 0 i

~ i z

' OATUM 2000 SUBSEA 0 4 Mties

  • ---;-,., 3. 3 M1ifi i I 3 2 Miles

';=, i 5 Mile, 6 3 Mile$  :!, ~~

"' ~ z

. ~._,_I' 1

{ ~

(

. ,.*"' i I <(

'/~..~

..J

)-

_....- _ r

"'z

)

e-I z

w CL z.:;,_1)

I

.-re; 2.

~ ~

I

l

?"'

7::

1 t' - ~

  • ~

~- ?--

r I;.l 0

r
1-..:c:'

Ur

_j t

~

I t' U)

,.. u 01

}- wW

II"'" i TOP er ifia
:

~ 0~

rWTE: See Figure 2.5.l-23A for location of cross section.

z

"'" ~

"'§ a"'z u u,

0 COMANCHE PEAK SE.S. <,:

X >  :

0 a

~ 0 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ~

I-z UNITS 1 and 2  ::,

0 u

_, 1-1000 ANO SOMERVELL COUNTIES , TEXASRTCA,. SCA.;..E *"I FEET Northwest To Southeast ,>

._J UJ ")G  ?*)C .',00 -=,r;o

§l~

i a:

l\MErWMENT 2 Structural Cross Section A-A' HORIZONTAL AS i'iOTED

~ ,~

z CD JULY 27, 1978 31: ;;~e ~

Mt.> ,p~

DO  ::.*t, ;,~ *t* 4s h J GRUY ANO ASSCCATES INC

r: (/')

(,)

FIGURE 2.5.1-30 -PRE-CAMB

SOUTHWEST NORTHEAST B B' 011_ CORP WE soro OIL COMPA.tfY D Al;,.e'.N/ THE BARON (0 8 M FiTZG~AALD No.I 8 W Wonr, '\lo I* A Brone-n Ror,ch Nol-8 Nel!:l:i W1 l,01"'1 Monr, Sur,e)

,-.c,oo TEXAS GUL;:- ENERGY ANO MlNERALS CO.US

!J

'i I

I, 1000 1500' 0

0

z

<i 2' ;z DATUM 28Mres 2 Miles l <(

?i' ~

l ~ ~

z

<(

...J

)-

1!

l "';z

< z i-

<  ;: '_;, w

- 2500' a.

3000' 3500' 4000'

! ~4500'

(/')

(.f)

>- 'L t;_j 2'

t;:i

<{<f

~

,. v;n:

~ ow ID >,

NOTE: See Figure 2.5.l-23A for i

' 5000' location of cross section.

z

<(

'I u

0 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. 0 rr I 0 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 5500' UNITS 1 and 2 HOOD AND SOMERVELL COUNTIES , TEXAS Southwest to Northeast AMENDMENT 2 0

I JULY 27, 1978 Structural Cross Section B-b,. , I I! 6000' FIGURE 2.5.1-31

C o ff c C \i A

- - - PALUXY SANO/GLEN ROSE CONTOUR GLEN ROS£ MARKER BED N

I

"' I

/

I A DATUM: BASE PALUXY SAND/TOP GLEN ROSE LIMESTONE CONTOUR INTERVAL 25 FT.

X=OUTCROP POINTS 0


======"' 2 Ml.

' .. C

'\

/

  • ~ /

Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRUCTURE MAP OVERLAY UPPER GLEN ROSE MARKER BED ZONE I/ZONE II FIGURE 2.5.1-32

JACK GRYNBERG &ASSOCIATES HOOPER N0.2 r i A GULF 01 L CORP.

C.L.CAMPBELL NO.I GULF OIL CORP. '-,

D.McINTOSH N0.1 '-

I '-'

B

' ~ W.

rJ8;S 0 tlJr:N2Ai{~f 0f5~~5?fp./ /

I. D. #2 1' "'BM

-V ... FITZGERALD INDEX TO STRUCTURAL CROSS-SECTIONS V / VAN MORRISON NO.l PALEOZOIC I / W.I.D. #3 I / A - A' FIGURE 2.5.1-30 GULF ENERGY AND MINERALS CO.U.S.

OTIS ROLLINS N0.1 I ~ B - B' FIGURE 2.5.1-31 I ,,/ DALLAS PROOUCTI ON CO.

BEN J. TAYLOR I / / HUBBARD NO .1 CRETACEOUS WIGGINS NO. l I / W. I. D. #1 4 C - C' FIGURE 2.5.1-34 w.r.o. #12 /

I / D - D' FIGURE 2. 5. 1- 33 0 I //

GULF OIL CORP. (R.D.ALLEN) 1,.. /

4,,,-- --+ VICINITY GEOLOGIC MAP r I FIGURE 2.5.1-10 AND BRATTEN RANCH N0.1-A - --0 CPS::S

~ - - - THEBA;JVRON co.\ [IT[ l

+-

I

- OUTCROP STRUCTURAL MAP FIGURE 2. 5.1-32 NELON N0.1-B ,,

GULF ENERGY A~D MINERALS co.u.s./M WI D # 21 \ DI AND RELATED CRETACEOUS MAPS BRATTEN RANCH. 7 / * * * \

/ SINGER-LAYNE TEXAS

/ ,, \ \TEXAS UTILITIES WW NO .1 I \ C' I / \

DE SOTO OIL CO. / e,O. e,O. \ OIL PROSPECTORS {C.H.KADANE ET AL)

B. W. WANN NO. 1 / '(>~~~vv \ M.M.BUNT ET AL NO.l

~<:P \

\

\

/" ',,

0 2 SCALE IN MILES 3 4

\< ,,

5 MI LE RAD I US

\

\ \

AMENDMENT 4 JANUARY 31, 1979 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

NUCLEAR PLANT

\

\ PLYMOUTH (M.E.DAVIS) 1/2_

T.H. COUSINS N0.1

\

V A'

UNITS 1 and 2 STRUCTURAL CROSS-SECTION LOCATIONS FIGURE 2.5.1-33

10 5 0 5 MILES MILES GULF ENERGY &MINERALS CO. U.S. SITE OTIS ROLLINS NO. 1 W.I.D.#12 C BEN J. TAYLOR C' WEST 0 WIGGINS NO. 1 EAST 0

1000 GAMMA RAY p SINGER-LAYNE TEXAS 100(

0 G1._ctv~I.J-ky TEXAS UTILITIES 0

Ros/':--!:'ltvlJ 0 WATER WELL NO. 1 l1fi1£:~

~ sro"'c 0

900 900 0 RESISTIVITY 0 0 OIL PROSPECTORS (C.H.KADANE ET AL)

N 0

SELF POTENTIAL M.M. BUNT ET AL NO.l

' ' 0

' ' ' <'Otv,'I:

C 800 GAMMA RAY

< 800

<'o~ ~

0 0 0 'I:,,

M 0 N '---

1-

~

w I-w w LL. 700 w 700 LL.

_J w 0

> 0 w

_J M SELF POTENT 1AL 0

0 RESISTIVITY

<C w

V) 0 N \>r -

0 c::(

w w

600 k: <'otv, 600 V1

'I: I L

!Jr 0

co c::(

0 0

<'o4'c I I/lb

'a w 0

co

...:r- c::(

z 0

..... 0 z 1-c::(

0 M 0 N

- 0 I-

> 500 <C w 500 s:

~

_J w w 0 _J 0 w

' LINE-OF-SECTION: INDEX MAP FIG. 2.5.1-33 400 400 GAMMA-RAY AND RESISTIVITY LOGS CORRELATED AMENDMENT 4 300 WITH LOGS OF CORE BORING P-10 AT SITE. JANUARY 31, 1979 300

{FIG. 2.5.5-17)

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

0 NUCLEAR PLANT 0

'° UNITS 1 and 2 200 200 CRETACEOUS STRUCTURE WEST TO EAST CROSS-SECTION C-C' FIGURE 2.5.1-34

15 10 5 0 MILES NORTHWEST SITE SOUTHEAST JACK GRYNBERG &ASSOCIATES HOOPER NO. 2 D D' GULF OIL CORP.

GAMMA RAY C.L. CAMPBELL NO. 1 0

W. I. D. #2 MID-CONTINENT PETROLEUM CORP.

SQUAW CREEK CATTLE CO. NO.l 800 800 0

0 o.... - SINGER-LAYNE TEXAS TEXAS UTILITIES WATER WELL NO. 1 700 GAMMA RAY 0 700 0

0 SELF POTENTIAL RESISTIVITY 0

1-w SELF POTENTIAL 0 1-0 w

~ 600 600 ~

.....J RES IST l VITV w .....J

> w w >

.....J w

.....J c;::

w er:

v, 500 w w 500 (/")

> 0 w 0

cc 0 >

CV"\ 0 c;:: co z Cf?Er, c;::

0 -1c8 z Pc;yJY. Dus .....

0 I-iw 400 0;z 400 1-w

_J 1/41V14/V w

.....J 0

0 w l(\

LINE-OF-SECTION: INDEX MAP

' FIG. 2.5.1-33 300 0

" C 300 0

I.(\

200 GAMMA-RAY AND RESISTIVITY LOGS CORRELATED WITH LOGS OF CORE BORING P-10 AT SITE.

(FIG. 2.5.5-17) c S,----_

200 AMENDMENT 4 JANUARY 31, 1979 COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

NUCLEAR PLANT 0

UNITS 1 and 2 0

'° CRETACEOUS STRUCTURE NORTHWEST TO SOUTHEAST CROSS-SECTION 0-0' FIGURE 2.5.1-35

3

"'Tl z)> 0 "Tl )::,

r c5 G"> ro C rr, (/)~

lJ  ;:o (/')

m 3: rr, C )> )>

(/')

z ri:J z ZONE O- NO DAMAGE

(/')

- -I 0 ZONE 1- MINOR DAMAGE N

(/')

l'Tl 3:

...... -I -< I

)> m ZONE 2- MODERATE DAMAGE

<.Tl :z

)::,

('"')

o (I) z)> -u ZONE 3- MAJOR DAMAGE
z ......

~

N I

0 (/') OJ m 1--'

'"CJ

,,;
::::,  !=2 )>

0.. (I) ;;,:::

rr, 3:

o )
:, N (/)
,,;
'"CJ

...... :0 ~ SOURCE:

z mm Algermissen and Perkins, 1973 (64)

(/') -u .

0 (/)

0 .

-I

019'6 f:T- rv 0

~ 1963 38 1970 0 N -'ll 1974 "'

I ,, 0 V "-.,

n l.._.*19.:_:4 "-.,

(

I V ""' Q, '-'

cc, OUACHITA PROVINCE C WICHITA DURo BAS l N 056 RED RIVER V ARCH CENTRAL TEXAS SHELF

() II E S T CENTRAL 196.5 ff TEXAS PROVINCE EASl SUBPROV!NCt I

I; "'~

"' \

0

\ 1353 y

~/

I 0

!S!'.11

,., >,, I ,Mc ,215\)lY 382 1_11- n, I 11, 1 c1l GU L F COA S T PROVINCE

- PROVINCE BOUNDARY SUBPROVINCE BUUNDARY COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

LARGE STRUCTURAL ARCHES PREDOMINANT SURFACE FAULT TRENDS FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PREDOMINANT SUBSURFACE FAULT TRENDS UNITS 1 and 2

()

TECTONIC PROVINCES AND EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER MAP FIGURE 2.5.2-2

100°

---r---+--+-----1-L/_L,____Ltri I l *N l

/  : I - I I II-,,) (

- I ~ I '

\

30°*-f--+--t--__J__ _l_ _l_ _J_ _J_ _ j___+---+--+---r-30° I

0 100 200 SCALE IN MILES LEGEND

....--..,soSEISMALS

  • LOCATION OF INTENSITY REPORTS COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT o EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER UNITS 1 and 2 I-XI I INTENSITY (MODIFIED MERCALLI) 1882 BONHAM (PARIS) TEXAS Doceka l ( 69) EARTHQUAKE ISOSEISMAL MAP FIGURE 2. 5. 2-3

92°

(? '"' "' l.__ ,

LIMIT OF FELT AREA MISSISSIP:I Marksville

  • ; ~o o--- 3 0

~-*

1)1

  • - * - * - * - * ~-........0 * ~. 0 3

i St, Francisville I _ IV

- 3 4 4 0 2

0 IV - V ** ** 3

  • ovingt
  • * ** 4

~laqueminE:

  • le 0

courtvil sonv JOO 0 V_ VI f"'l.3*4 *

!apole,mville l ** Alleman kli~ 3-4 *,. City 4

  • y_ l. 5 ***

3-4 Thibodaux 0

0

(;VLF OF MEXICO LEGEND:

4 Denotes Rossi-Forel intensity at reporting location I-IV Denotes range in Rossi-Forel intensities intensities reported in contoured area 0 20 40 60 Mites SCALE COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 1930 DONALDSONVILLE, LA.

REFERENCE:

Neumann (24) EARTHQUAKE ISOSEISMAL MAP FIGURE 2.5.2-4

110* 10s* 100° 98 *

(./)

C)

C

0 C'")

o Ve:fu II Ill z

CD C

3 p,

I
I p,
I 0..

oela.irem

- l'*

t co 0

0..

CD

0
0 V)

-I

)>

-I 0

o o.-* _!lA 0 Ode sa.

C: 2~~* / I N -I V1 T

-...J J'TI

x 0

--1.~~JT_*______;t--+----.-13 r- ....

0 J'TI V) 0 30° AUG. 16 VIII

-n ):>

@ ~

lJ ::x::

m .o C

):>

'° w

28' __

f[_

I --+----- I 0 hihuahua N rn

e::
  • I 3abina~o 01 N

(./)

~ -i

(./)

I JMf E C u I oJimineJ 01 rn -i

..... rn

(./) ~

$ (./)

r 108° 106° 104

  • 102' 100* 98'

960W

_,/', I


~

' ELLIS ///'

/'/ '-*

~ HENDERSON I

\ _,,,,,, / ?___(, '

\ V\_./

CORSICANA -

HILL 32°N-~--;:-~~-=-7-~--------~J__ _ _ _ _~

NAVARRO R ,

,/

/ /. 1./ P-*-- , \

Sellards (33)

)

LIMIT OF FEL.T AREA~

\/ ).,

., - u~/'

_. _ / .

\

ANDERSON

\,'{Z/1{ k~'\*

TEHUACANA' \. -'1-...

z~XI,~

NOAA EPICENTER(1191)

'\ ~ J I ~

6 \

PRAiiIE HILL r

\ \ 0 TEAGUE FREESTONE "' _

,/,

' \ LIMESTONE \ I /-

  • ~L 1 * ,,,..,.,

MC /

LEN N A N 'GROESBECKO

  • OOCEKAL EPICENTER (69) 1

-I ,,,,- _/

y 1 ,, '

\

\

'--o"'

THORNTON

,,,,--iI

/"

'\ /'

\

FALLS

~-/ ~. LEON

\ \

/,, ~

\' / .. ~ * ' RO BERTSON '\

_,,-,_L-____j

/ . z-3lON-7~r-'-~-~--j.J'-~------~*"r-~L_,,_

,k-

\v\ I ,,,,,/ },

MADISON I \

MILAM I -~ / i COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

. , , , OIL OR GAS FIELD UNITS 1 and 2 FAULT, HACHURES ON D0WNTHR0WN SIDE 1932 WORTHAM-MEXIA EAR1'HQUAKE LOCATION MAP FIGURE 2. 5. 2-6

AFTER BRAZEE (1972}

Ref. 2.5-88 v11,---,----,.---r---,---,--""T-"--r--""I:::::=--I L..----'~

~-

~/"'

i:: ,,,,

~ v11--........l--~--.£.+.---I----+--~--+--+-----'

r Vl,.._ /

~i V j V

V 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 ARE.A OF MMIV OR GREATER (1000 SQ MI)

A. Felt Area - Modified Mercalli Intensity Relationship for Eastern and Central U. S. Earthquakes AFTER FLAWN (1970)

Ref. 2.5-89 35

,1 I

30 t I MEXIA FIELD I I I I OIL PRODUCTION HISTORY 25

......6 t I

l u I Q.-.. 20 I

~!'.:!

""l:Q I

I

\

\

g! 15 I

l I

I

\

\.

\

cl

~

~ 10 '

I

\

I I ' \

\

'v 5 , ... ,.

,./

I ...... _ ...

0 1920 1922 1924 1926 1928 1930 1932 TIME YEARS B. Mexia Field Oil Production History COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 MEXIA EARTHQUAKE OBSERVATIONS FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 2- 7

102* 98° 96° 94* 92*

  • L* I 38*1---+"G;;:i;;;i'l3/4-----,4""~='----+-!.!..-+---:-;:,,q..-::--J--4---t--,c,;;-

r'ltoll,,. r oll KA OKLA o,; t o11 rex. ..,._

&w..,.

36°1---t--Jf--H ---l~~---!.-1~~

.~~J

~i 0 31 32° 1--t---l---l-~ ,._l-----,l--- --t---k--- -=~f-'-:~-- 32° Statute Miles lln.dyo 6- st Tho 8

98° 95* 94* 92° COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 1952 EL RENO, OKLAHOMA SOURCE: Murphy,L.M. and Cloud,W.K. (27) EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY MAP FIGURE 2. 5, 2-8

100' 99' 98" 97* 96' KANSAS 37*

36" 36' OKLAHOMA Limits of Felt Area 35* 35*

TEXAS a:,* 33' 3

0 100* 99*

17 June 1959, 04:27:07 CST 0!020 40 60 80 100 32*

E3 F:--::-:::-3 E-----------3 Scale of Miles 96' COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SOURCE: Eppley,R.A. and Cloud,W.K. (93) 1959 SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA EARTHQUAKE ISOSEISMAL MAP FIGURE 2.5.2-9

OKLAHOMA ARK.

NEW MEXICO TEXAS NOTE: Other gypsum and/or onhydrito strata ore known* to exist in the subsurface.

LEGEND

,:;f!j Outcrops of gypsiferous formations x Anhydrite uplift 20"...,... ldohytetal-mean annual precipitation Subsurface Salt-Anhydrite deposition (j) Balcones Fault Zone 100 200 Mexia-Talco Fault Zone COMANCHE PEAK S.ES SOURCES: A. A. Meyerhoff, W. Paine; "Interactions among Tectonics, Sedimentation and Hydro- FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT carbon Accumulation", in Gulf Coast Assoc. UNITS 1 and 2 of Geol. Socs. Trans., 1970.

Brune, 1965. U.S.Weather Bureau, 1965. DISTRIBUTION OF GVPSIFEROUS FORMATIONSJ ANHYDRITE UPLIFTS AND LOUANN SALT FIGURE 2.S.?-]f)

WEST EAST V) j-.--BALCONES FAULT ZONE-..-j 0 WACO 1000' ~

.=

l.lJ

~~~%IJ O' a::

u a:

~;~~~i)

LU a..

a..

1000' V')

0 l.lJ

(...)

2000' t==

l.lJ a:

u a::

LU 3000' :31:

0

....J

,, 4000' z

)> (")

"Tl ci 0:,

ro 0 5 10 Miles C )::, C/) ~

0 r m C )> )> Horizontal Scale

("')

o 0 oz

("')

z- i+l z

-l (")

N 01 u, rrJ u, u, -l -< I Cl) )> m N

u, .,,

("') C:

)::, -" z -0 I

...... w )> m

..... I-I'

) ~ )>
a. Cl) :r;:

§t~ N C/)

z :0 '!)

l'T1 mm Modified after Baylor Geological Society

-0 .

0 C/)

0 .

Guidebook (1964), Fig. 3

-l

CONTROL WELLS GROUND EAST WEST SURFACE TERTIARY 1000' t-LU LU I.&..

-z

x:

t-o.

UPPER CRETACEOUS LU C

2000' AUSTIN CHALK ii~:::=:::: :::;::::::::: ::::: .......... .. ~ *

!iii WOODBINE SAND ti ...........

3000' ..................... : : : :::::::: .... ,.

LOWER CRETACEOUS 0 1000 Feet Horizontal Scale COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

Modified after Lahee, Fig. 29 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Structure of Typical American Oil Fields UNITS 1 and 2 Vol. 1, 1929 MPG.

MEXIA FAULT ZONE CROSS SECTION FIGURE 2. 5. 2-12

INDEX MAP AREA *coVERED BY THIS FIGURE 0 50 MILES SOURCES: Structural Mop of Texa,11, N. E. Quod., l:500,000, 1946 Basement Rocks of Texos cmd Southeast New Mexico; 1:250,000, 1956 Geologic Atlas of Texas, Waco Sheet; 1:2,50,000; 1970 Weeks, A.W., 1945, p. 1735 Reaser, D.F., 1961, p. 1760 Domes & Moore Earthquake Epicenter Mop of Texas; 1:2,500,000; 1972

  • COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

LEGENO FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

/ Contour on Basement Surface

/ (mean sea level datum) UNITS 1 and 2

/ Fault, downthrown side indicated 1950 FAULTS AND A Earthquake Epicenter BASEMENT CONFIGURATION

  • Well penetrating basement rocks, used for control FIGURE 2. 5. 2-13

HOWELL ANO SCHULTZ (197!5) 2 ill z:

11,1 GUPTA AND z: - NUTTLI { 197ts) 3

- IC

.J ...

..J I

<I(

u 0 IC M C

lE 4 0

11,1 II.

0 0

a SAFE SHUTDOWN II EAIITHQUAK[

[VALUATION - - - - - ,

1 1'-o_ __..2.__o_...1,o_....1.40----,,i5o.,....---1..1.oo.,....-.1---2.1...oo--,,-s.1...oo,...4.,...o....o-aoo.L...,---1~00.__o.___.i....,2000 It

  • KILOM!'.Tlltl 0 10 20 JO 50 100 200 300 400 100 1000 It- MILES EPICENT[II DISTANCE NOTES: BASIS FOR INTENSITY DATA INTENSITY VI I I - VALENTINE, TEXAS, 1931 INTENSITY VII - BONHAM, TEXAS, 1882

- EL RENO, OKLAHOMA, 1952 BASIS FOR COMPARISON (121,122,123)

Io - EPICENTER INTENSITY I(R) - INTENSITY AT DISTANCE R COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EARTHQUAKE ATTENUATION F6URE 2.5.2-14

U'1 .... aa*s a.

IS:I ISi N

01 lt1 ISi

r ll I

ISi \ t ae*h l'5il

r V

...a..

c U'1 a:

...J w :z I-L,J c:::a I

a..

t..

C U'1

i

...J t a*t w

V a::

w 0..

i c:::a Cl I z Cl :c
z

-a:z:

-gj :z- ~ t--~

U'1 L!l

z L!l 0::
l I-Cl I.Il ta >-

aa*,

11*1

~ ~ 14 ~ ~

I I I  !!!

15d NI 553~15 II et ~

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN Pwr Sheet 1 of 25 FIGURE 2. 5 .4-1

BORING N .: P-1 DEPTH= 90.0-90.7 YOUNG'S MODULUS Dr ELASTICITY= ~00000 PSI llll.U nm.u 2'1111.U 2IU.U IBIIIJ.U lil 0.

z 1m.u l.J1 l.J1 120.D w

~

i-

'"Tl l.J1 9111.U z

,, )> (')

ro C)

C {/)

CJ) ~

0 m

.N

~i ffi {/)

C ~ )>

zmZ

- --l (')

61111.U u,

rt I

{/) --l -< I Nt-:1 (f) )> m ]Ill.Ill

~!z

.i:,.

I _. z -0 f---' ru )> m N  ::, ~ )>

u, tu 0.. (f) A !l.D

§ N (f)

ti 1/)

I 1:1 I. II et.

N ISi llil N mm

-0 .

0 (f)

ti .

--l STRAIN lN PERCENT

BORING N.: P-~ OEPTH: ~9.6-60.3 YOUNG'S MOOULUS or ELASTICITY= 200000 PSI lBll!J.118 BIii.iii IJl 0..

z mm.111 IJl U1 w

0::

,, .t- 'Im.BIi U1 z)> n "Tl C)

,o en C

lJ rn N

~;

IB en z

(/)

C )> )>

- -; n

R

~

z a.mi U7 rt en I -; -< I w 1-3 (I) )> m

... z z~

~

I -0 I-' 0 Cl.l )> m t-h N :J ~ )>

U1 'O Cl. (f) ;;r;:: ii.ml

§ N (/)

0 I. 1.,1 N

et r:"'151 ISi ISi

0 mm

-0 .

0 (/)

IU m m -

0 .

-; STRRlN lN PERCENT

U1 0.

r mrz ISi ISi N

N L1 r,

11 I

ISi I-N V

t-Ul

\ + r.15* t

c

..... a:

-1

a. 1.iJ I-w z c:'::I Li.. w Cl V ct:

m tn

J w

0.' -1

J CL.

z C

. c:'::I CJ

c aa*r z

-z

-z

~

1ll Ul n::

- a

z n-:

CJ L!l ct:

I-U1 r:::a >-

~ I as*a mnr II II Ill Ill Ill ~ I!

Pl Ill Jlt Id ~ tl'f Sl tSd Nt 553~15 COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN FUJI' Sheet 4 of 25 FIGURE 2 .5 .4-1

BORING ND.: P-9 OEPTH: 36.1-36.B YOUNG'S t10ULUS or ELASTICITY= 320000 PSI H1111.81 ISIIB.1111 121111.1111 lil a..

z !1:111.ml lil lil w

a:;

J-

-n Ul z)>

., ro

("')

ci C Cf)

(/) ~

0 m

N gi

(!)

c z- ~ z

-i ("')

Cf)

U1 rt I Cf)

-i -< I m

~!

.i:,. Cl) )>

I I-' ...... z 7J H) z a., )> m N  ::::i ~ )>

lT1 ltJ C.(/)7' l.l!lil

§ N (/)

u (J) I l4l ct ~ ffl mm 7J .

0 (/)

u

-i

_ _ _ _ _ _ _1.,___ _ _ _-_*- * - - - - - - *_ _ s~~-AI!_ ;_P_E_R_c_EN_r__r.i _ _ _ _ _-_*_ _ j

Lil ll"h a..

8 l{)

ID

. I'- a*t f.11 ll I >-

r-ISi

. t-V L,1 ll t 0

I:

t-Lil a:

t- ..J I-a.. L&J z

L&J 0 1£. a*t w C V D'l Ul a::.

LJ I

a.. =-..J a..

. =-

0 n*t z C

C s:

z L!J z -z Lil L!J

-ca::.zc

[t:

=-C m*, I-C I.fl tD >-

11*1 a**

I ISd NI SS3M1S COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN PI.Or Sheet 6 of 25 FIGURE 2.5.4-1

lJ1 Cl.

nn* a N

01

,,,L1.

r LO r---

11 Sl.' t I

r. >-

N Li1 V

IIJS" r lJ1

c a:

..... ...J t.,J I-IL t.,J :z c::::a LL. se* r w Cl V a::

en lJ1 w 1

Cl.

J

...J a..

J
z

. 0 Cl l!H I Cl ~

z L!l
z -

lJ1 l!l

-a::z

z a::

a::  :::J SI. "ll I-Cl Cl lI1 co >-

!Hf" ll Ii ti I!

ffl I

' lSd Ni 553tll5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN PI.Or Sheet 7 of 25 FIGURE 2 . 5. 4-1

lJ1 n.

N N

N N

lt1 lt1

. N N

lC 11 l >-

r. 18"1
r LO V

t-

r:

t-lJ1 a:

a- .J t-a.. tJ z

l.aJ 0 I.&.. w Cl u*a V a,

a::

lJ1 LJ l  :::> n..

a.. ..J 0

Cl z

Cl X:

z z lJ1 L!J z -LO a:

-a::

0 1h 1 a::

z t-

> Ln Cl Cl ta >-

ar:.*a

~

I

~ ~ I I

I IN

=

  • m =

Pl 15d NI 553M!5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN PLOI' Sheet 8 of 25 FIGURE 2

  • 5 . 4-1

U1 a..

n*t ISi ISi Lt1 N

lD

. M

.S(. t

,.... II I >-

ISi ISi V-I-

11.s-r

c I-U1 a:

I- ...J I-a.. lJ z

w 0 l.t.. .si: 1 w C V ct:

a, U1 w

..., a..

I  ::I a.. ...J

I z

. 0 C

C s:

z z U1 L!]

z -LC a:

ct:

z .s1.*1 I-a::  ::I U1 Cl C tQ >-

m*a I

I i

  • Ct I.

lSd Nl 553Hl5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN PWI' Sheet 9 of 25 FIGURE 2. 5 .4-1

U1 Q.

n*,

1D ISi

+

LJ

r N

. :r a, 11 l

V a,

..:c ....cc U1

....a.. ...I LJ w z 0 I.&.. w V

Cl a** 0:::

a, l

U1

I w

Cl..

a.. ...I

J z Cl

. 0 Cl 2::

z: z L!J -

U1 a:

z 0:::

Cl LO z

J Cl lh"I

.,_0:::

Ln to >-

n*a

~ I ~ I ~

a

.... I I  ; I I.

15d NI 553Hl5 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN Pwr Sheet 10 of 25 FIGURE 2

  • 5 . 4-1

1.11 a.

r,

r LC
r

. ltl r,

r l II r,

r, t- 11*1

r V
c t-1.11 t- a: lt.."I
a. .J t-w w z 0

t... I.a.I Cl a** V ISi a::

1.11 w

.::i c..

a. .J

.::i 0 a*, z c:t Cl :c z z l!J z -z Ul L!'l

      • cc ct:

a:: .::i t-Cl Cl Lil ta >-

at*

11*1 I.

~

I

  • tSd NI 553Hl5 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STPAIN PWT Sheet 11 of 25

U1 N"h n.

l"1

r tD a,

. I"'-

m*t

r 1 II I"'-

tD t-

r V n*t
c t-U1 t- a:
n. ...J I-LaJ L,J Ca z LI. a*z w Cl V tsl a::

U1 LJ I

n.

J

...J a..

=:J z Cl

. 0 Cl

I::

n*z.

z z l!l -

U1 a:

z a::

Cl LO z

J Cl ll" f a::

t-u, r:a >-

n* I lll"I n**

II II I

~ I fSd Nf 553Hl5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN PWT Sheet 12 of 25 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4-1

U1 a..

n*,

151 151 151 UJ

. lSl l5l lt1 lt1 Ul

r l

lt1 II t-V

c t-U1 t- a: 11.*1 a.. ...J I-laJ laJ 0 z t... w ISi C

U1

      • V a::

w I

a..

J

...J a..

J z Cl

. 0 C

z:

11*1 z

z l!J z -z U1 L!l a:

a::

tt:  ::J I-Cl Cl U1 ta IE*I If .*

n**

I i I ISd Nf 553cf.LS COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN Pwr Sheet 13 of 25 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4-1

U1 ff"h a..

ISi ISi Ltl

r EJ'l

. [I]

as*t lt1 I II lt1

[D t-lt1 V

c t-U1 11"£ t-a.. _,

a:

~

L,.J L,J 0 z La.. a*t w C V ISi a::

Lil w I

a.. _,

=:J IL

=:J z

Cl

. 0 C

2::

n*i z z L!l z -UJ U1 a:

a::

z as*r ~

a: =:J U1 Cl C tC >-

n*r n*a

~ ~ I

~ ~

  • ISd NI 553M15 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN PWT Sheet 14 of 25 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4-1

1.11 a..

n*r UJ ISi

+

ISi ID

. w ***

r--

lD l

r r-- -

I-V

c I-I-

1.11 a; ,,. ..

a.. ...J I-l,.J t,J Ca z I.a.. l,J ISi C

1.11

      • V ct:

l,J I  ::I Cl.

a.. ...J

I z Cl

. 0 C

c m-a z

l!]

1.11

- -az:

z a::

l !]

z

I
      • ct:

I-Cl C U1 l:Q >-

lt"I "IfSd NI 553Hl5 I

a I COMANCHE PEAK S. E. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS-STRAIN PIJJI' Sheet 15 of 25 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4 -1

I.II

a. **z ISi ISi ISi ISi m

. ISi ISi s,.:,

,.... lt1 II IT'1 >-

I-

,.... V

.. I-a*'

c I.II I- a:

a.. ...J I-l.,.J l.,.J 0 :z l,J La.. st* I CJ V l5l a::

I.II

J w

l a.. ...J a.

J
z C

. 0 CJ s::

z I.II z

L!J

z - a:

-a::

C L!J z

J CJ n:1 a::

I-U1 ta >-

I II I! I I i I a I fSd NI 553~l.5 COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

FINAL SAFET*: ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 16 of 25 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4 -1

U1 a.. n*t 151 151

,.... ISl lD lt1 .Sf.. t N

l 11 N

lD N

V-I-

IS" I I-

c U1 I- a:

a.. ..J I-t&J La.I c::::a z I.,.. n:1 w Cl V ct::

U1 w a..

l  ::::J

..J a...

J n*r z

. c::::a Cl Cl s:

z z l!l z -:z U1 a:

-a:::

Cl L!l

l C

s1.*1 ct::

I-lJ1 m >-

as**

.sz.*1 II! I.

a

  • I5d N r *553~15 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 17 of 25 FIGURE 2 . 5

  • 4-1

1.11 CL. ***i ISl ISl ISl

[IJ ISl ae*t lD lt1 fT'1 I II

m. >-

...... es* t

r fT'1 V
x:

1.11 I- a: 1h. I a.. _J I-w w z Ca Lr.. LJ CJ It. I V a:::.

1.11 LJ

... , a..

l  ::i a.. _J

i z Q

CJ Cl  ::c z

1.11 z

l!]

z -

L!l ae** cc a:::.

z I-0::: ::i Cl CJ Ln tll >-

es**

lh"I IZ.'I 11*1 I! = *II!

  • =

m m m

=.

ISi ISi m

=

  • *m m ISi

=*

1\1 ISi Ill 15d NI 553~15 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 18 of 25 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4- l

Ul D..

n*r Lr1

r Lr1
r Lr1
r r,

I II r,

n**

to r, -

a-V

c a-Ul a- a: 11.*1 D.. ...J t-w LJ z

0 LL. w CJ n*1 V ct:

Ul

.::s w l

a.. a..

... ...J

.::s 0

CJ IS"I z Cl s:

z I.!]

Ul

- -az:

z ct:

l.!l z

J
      • ct:

t-Cl CJ 1.11 tD lt"I II *1

~ ~

~

ffl I

  • ISd NI SS3Ml.5 COMANCHE PEAK E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 19 of 25 FIGURE 2. 5. 4-1

Ln a.

n*,

LD ISi

+ lli"I M

. La.I lt1 lt1 l ll M

. >- n*

r lt1 t-V
c t-Lil .,...

l- a:

a.. ..J t-LiJ La.I z Ca

u. l.tJ C as*

V Ct:

Lil l.tJ l  ::i Q.

a.. ..J

i z

. 0 C

as*

Cl s:::

z z Lil l!]

z - *** cc

-a:=

Cl L!J z

i Cl Ct:

t-1.11 ta >-

at*

ll."I 11*1 n*

~ ~ ~ ~ 14 I.

I I I I a

  • tSd NI 553M.l5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 20 of 25 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4-1

lJl CL.

o*i ISl ISi ISi ISi

. ISl LD 1a* I N

lD l ti N >- 19* I lD I-V I-

c lJl .... t I- a:

0.. ...J .I-4J ~

0 z I.A.. LJ Cl 1z: t V a::

lJl LJ

i a..

0.. ...J

i z 0 11* I Cl Cl  ::I:

z z l.!l z -

lJl l.!l 11&"1 a:

ct:

z .I-Ct:  ::i Cl Cl U1 to >-

1s*a az:a

~

.

- . .= ~

ISIL Ill I

- - = = * .

Ill

~

I Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill In m r-- 11'1 'Z l"'I N 15d NI 553Hl5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 21 of 25 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4-1

t.n a.. aa*s ISi ISi

r

. N

r 1 11 111rs VI M

t-V

c t-t.n t- a:

a.. -1 111*h 1:-

w w z 0

t... w Cl V M a::

t.n w I

a..

J

-1 a..

Cl

J 0

Cl

c
      • t z z z t.n l!J z -l!l a:

a::

z 1:-

a::  ;:J Lf1 Cl tfl Cl

>- ***i I

Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill D1 I

I I

. I.

m 151

~

,- =-

Ill m

m re I .

!:??

Ill Ill 1111 15d NI 553tll5 COMANCHE PEAK S. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 22 Of 25 FiGURE 2. 5. 4-1

U1 a..

n*z ISi ISi ISi

. :r 11* I

r m

N I n lt1

. as*,

CD N

)-

V

c

)-

U1

)- a: Ith.'

Cl. ..J w l.,J I-0 z t.&.. w Cl It" t V r, ct:

U1 w I

Cl.

=i

..J a..

=i z

. 0 Cl

... t Cl X:

z z U1 l!]

z -

l!] 18"1 a:

ct:

z I-ct:  :::i Cl Cl Ul t:ll as**

lt'I n*a I! =! 111 I!

= . I! I!
  • =

. I! I! I

=

  • m m Ill Ill

~

~

r m
r
  • C"I E ltl ~ ~

ISd NI S53M15 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 23 of 25 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4-1

ll1 u*h a.

m m

m r-. a, m as*t lD I II ISi m

t-lD V

c t-ll1 n*t t- a:

a.. ...J t-1aJ 41 z

°' la..

Cl as*, w V

r Ct:

ll1

a w I

a.. ...J a..

a 0

Cl

, z Cl s::

z z L!J z -z ll1 L!J a:

Ct:

ct:  ;::a as*, t-Cl Cl U1 m >-

a*,

n**

~ ~

15d NI 553H.l5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 24 of 25 FIGURE 2 . 5 . 4-1

U1 a..

ISi ISi ISi ISi ISi ISi

,s.. ,

lD ll1 N

I II N

I- aa*a ll1 N V I-

c U1 at.*a I- a:

CL. .J w t.iJ t-0 z Li.. L.J C 19*1 V lD a::

U1 L.J CL.

l  :::J

.J a..

J z 0 15"1 C

C  %:

z z U1 l!J - a:

-a:z L!l z

J lh*r a::

t-Ln Cl C tll >-

at**

n*a

= ~

=

=

Ill Pl

~

Ill

=

N -

Ill N

Ill

=

=

=

~

15d NI 553~15

~

et -

l!l l!l COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY .~NALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRAIN-STRESS PLOT Sheet 25 of 25 FIGURE 2

  • 5 * -1

ci u

z ,(

[!)1/1 N.

I- ::J

!!!z o-w~

z*

.._, l Cl

i w

KOLO$,...

Samples Saturated With 200 PSI Back Pressure Saturated, Undrained Test CLAYSTONE s:::.

(.>

rm MOHR STRESS DIAGRAM

-C:

G) 0

, H=f EI a

(/)

'CD

'0 C

, V 0

/

a.. - -

J I

.,. /

- I I i

(/)

' I' CJ) w a:

~

r l/

2 30°

.... l JI I tffi ......

.... I-t- I I I c,, ,._ \

ti) 16° f, I/ V I

[..-

....... ... t I

I I,, ~

1---

I' ,, I ijI I l\

=

rs. '

~,~....

Cf

~

r..

V " 2~ 4 -' 6 I I&

, COMANCHE PEAK S.ES.

30 psi \ ' \

5--

i 1l 3 I I

I I FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 1

100 200 300 400 UNITS 1 and 2 500 600 MOHR DEA.GRAMS STRESS - Pounds /Square Inch CIAYSTONE SAMPIBS FIGURE 2.5.4-3 IHOH:UI

rt£ . . _J '-* ' r I I

...1 I

--*-* **-**** -* - --~1-*  :

+-*-*- i L ' I t- I .I-

'  : i

+ I t*

I

--r-: ._... .. t*: .. ***-- -+-- *---- r*- **-

-~-'"  :

i i I

I H~ r-

!  : I I :p I

-t ,
  • L. .L.l t - -- '*- i- "**
  • 1 t- - ... -

i i

+-

I i i I

+ I ft_

i i i I i ..I J i""/

m#

I

'-->- 4000 *r i

~-*--

f I  : i I

t-+- - "[1----1--' /

£+*

I I I

---**-* t- -  : i  :

I

- -l- I ...

! I II :[

+-'

I :i I ti*

C- *.*.

1 i I I

+

I -i--

' \ I 7" I  : I

-7 ',--l-i I I I i I I I r I

YI I I I I t

/+tl' I

-; 'I '

I I

I I i +: . r  : /

I

  • =*-'_ i-t i L+--

l .;. r-* L I I

I I I I  ;

' I -

._ __ >-+

i '  :

I I I

I .

I , __

+- Z.1 ...... !/ - -- ~t-

l ,_

I - -~-- - .. *- ' l ..

t/ -ij -r1 ' i--

I

~-+-- , _._

I

-+t_  :  :

-- t*: *- ****- /t-:/1 ->-+ ,_ I

--* f...-,_

3000 + ****,- ~,*- I 1 I ./

I I

I I '

L

' I I

+r -++-+ - -+*

' ' +-:-+! -l-t

~****~ww}

lI -1 l,-* !l 4+-

I

,I

  • - j

}

l

/j_

' I I.

--f -

i

-- *t 7 - I

-- --U "'t_j_,_ ---1!

I r- ,;

I I

t +r +-) - it t- ~~= I j I

'Ee,--

I , __ f- --- t* -** ! ,_ l-f I I I

'---rL: I I  : I I I

.f

/1

~j-


rI i  ;

-L+-L -1

-~--+-t-H

-1 ... ,..*

I t --~- 1+ '

l..

I

-1 V I...

¥, -

-+-

' +

I

  • I

-+- *+-

~-

-- (/) j- 1, l I 7  !~

-- P.. .

-- z .. L .1 i

I i

' I i I

I

~- ~ -

r-

,_ H 2000 I

==:.. + I I

I I

I i,

I/ I I I

I I H (/)

(/)

t+-i-+  :

I i j I .J

-r-- I I I i

I I

i

-j µ.:J p::: r~Jl ' I I i J 1' I i I L-

-L~H--

ztit+

I I I i/

8 i I

I .; i  :

(fJ , __

~--.-,,,,,,.,.,. I I

I I

  • I I I I' ~

,, r1 I I i

I L_. I '

I I

~ '

l

. +--.. ,-

f--

! I


i

-1, J I

~: (

.-- - -*-::- I I

.. 'I: I I

,.. I ,. "---

1 I I  ! "j I r I  :

,__L - . .;..

~-H-ffl I  !

I I

l' r 111 I

I

, ...... ... l ... t I . l I

' -++- I+

r ,+ -

' j ,1 I ' !

  • -H- ->-

i '

+ Boring No. 9 1000 I j/j Depth
32.6'-33.5'

-+ *- LIMESTONE, VERY HARD I

i *t .iffl: -- +

I f '/'/

--~

rt1 =~l I

r *--'-* 11 '

l COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

_, t FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

+1 f--

1-, *r+-~t

  • I t-

-I-

/

UNITS 1 and 2

--t - -

  • tI *f-  :

ff

,i'f, 'I STRESS vs. "VERTICAL STRAIN

-+ -+7-t I 1*,

I ._..i t ,I ,

J'

-ff

'/

-+--+-+ ++*-'

T r

USING SR-4 STRAIN GAGES T! I l ,

I FIGURE 2.5.4-4

+o  !

I/ I /i I i l"

I

' I

. 04 -

c-*+--t

  • 06 .08 .10

-W- -.02

- 0 I I

.02 I I I

t

'T I I I .L I "'TTT:  ! l I I I I I

I I i

-+ i

  • --tt--r I

- STRAIN IN PERCENT--

I

  • I I

I t -- --*

-r I

I I I I

I

- -- - I l T I I

i I I

1 Trw-

  • 1 I I I I I

Boring No. P-9 Depth=32.6'-33.5' LIMESTONE VERY HARD COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS VS. LATERAL STRAIN USING SR-4 STRAIN GAGES

l i; l

~ ~

ti L *t~

_
__ 1- f l~* :

f ,

-: ~ ]

j -*'

~

~. '1' t

! +

--:-r_-:- . l '

- t - .._

I ---i..--.-'-+---+---+->----+--+--+-+-,-.-+---i.-:_...__

+-+

7"*+ .

,- t --t

~-_:_.'. ,-L *---'- ,~- '

-t**+ .--t ----;.- ~- *  !-t-L-r _,._i-~~*+-+-,

Boring Noo P-9 Depth: 60o0'-62.,7' CLAYS TONE

+--i-

.:_;* -,--,-- COMAl\lCHE PEAK S.E.S .

_; .j} ~--:*-*-

-t---:-

t-4-+-

FiNl\L SAFETY Af\lA.LYSIS REPORT

    • + *i-. --r~ +-*

. : ~ t-+ ~ - UNiTS 1 ~,1'd 2 r _; l-+---r-

+ ~ '--ti-+ STRESS vs VERTICAL S'J.'};,,>,IN

~J~

C USING SR*-4 STRA.IN :::.~ACES 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ - - *-

4 __ , ..4 .*..., +-;-+-*+, **++ t

, *. 1 . ..L..L..LJ__L.C-L..-)...._;..-L-.l.-i.....l....i...J...L.L.J.j_l.-

Boring No. P-9 Depth: 60.9'-62.7' CLAYSTONE COMANCHE PE AK S. S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 VS. IATERAL STRAIN

/ USING SR-4 STRZUN GAGES FIGURE 2.5.4-7


- ,i.--.

+f

-+- I +-- ++-f-+-+-l--+-+-+-l-+--+---<-+--+-l--+-i-+-l---+--+-+-+--+--1..+-i-+-+-L....L....l......L...:I

. ..._;_+_._ .........,__.__,_ 1-- L-.. --+--

I

+

-+-,-+-+--f-+-+-, -+--+--+ ,-+-+-,

-r t ~---r- --+ - I +-l-+-+--4-1--+-+-+-+ - - - -

rt - --+-+--+--+-+-+--+-+-+--+-+--,

.i_ __ .___ -

1-+--+-+-+-++. I- .__ I- -+*-+---'-+-+-+--+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+--+-if-+-+-1--+-+--+-+-+-+--+-+-l-l--,__.j_._. j ...........-+--..-+--+--... - ._

...L 8000

--+-1--+--+->--1--i-+-l-+--+---<-+--+-1--+-i-+-l---+--+-+-+--+--1--+-i-+-+-L-+--->-L-i--~1- +-+--+-+-H-+-+-i~-,--+--....+-+-+-+-+~- >-..-+-+-+

I I

I

--t

+-+-+-+-l--+-f-+-+--1--+-i-+-+*-+---+---<-+--+-->-+-+-+-l---+--+-+-+--+--1--+-+--+-l-'--'--'---'- .L...L..L..L.+-+

I l lo-- ~-- ,1. **** ~.I- ~~-- *--- --+-1--+-+-+I *---; f-- ~- - --- t--1-rf-- - l-I I_,$

I 7000 i I I I I

I I I I

--+--+---~-+-+--+-+-+-+-+--1--+--+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+--+--1---l-+-'-+....-+-+--+-*

-+--+-1-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+--+-+-+--+-+-+--4 -+-,-+**+-+--+-+--f .1-

---41-+-+-+--+--li'I/'-+--+-+--+-+---+-+-+--+-+--+- t- ~

r H-H- I

+--+-+-+--1-.--+--1--+--+-l--+---+--+-l-+--+-if-+-+--l--+-i-+-l-+--'---'--'--'--+-+-'-.L.-'-

I t-- ,- *- -

f-+-1--+..-i.-+-+--+-+--+-1*-+---1-+-+--+-+--+-+-4--++-4

~ ~ _._......,.J_..j_..j. __.__. H-+--+--+---+--+-

I I

_._ I Tf-

~

I I

-t f--+-+-+--+--+-+-+--+-+---++-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-t-+--<-f--+-+-+--+-+- +--l -l-+-A--+- +--l---l--+-l-i--t--1--+-+--+--+-+-+-1--+--+--t--1 I

6000 T +--+-+--+-->-+-+--+--+--+--+....-+--+-<-+--+--l--+--+--+-l-+-+-+-+--+--L+-J._(_j_ __ l+-4f--+-+-+-+-+-+4-+-+--f--+-i-*f--+--+-+-l-+--+-,

j__*

,:=:::~. .

I I I I ) I

>-+-+-+-+-+--+s1_o._o.._.o_._ __....\-_,;.....

t-+-+-f-+-+ -

___~:=::*===t-

-l~-:. .

,_-+-1---++-:-..+.... +....

'--:-_:',: : : : : : : : : : +  :-l:_4',..1

/ :o 1

~-::_.L.---;_-+~-=-~'~.:+.--.:~:--++-~-+,_++-~-

- - 7---t"-+-+-i-+,+---1--++--+-+-++-i

+**-+-+-++-+~--+.~-+----::::::

--- H

. - -- ~--** ++--1/4 ,-+---.--+--+-+-:-+-*-+1-+-+-4-+-+-..-l---+--+-+-+-+--+---f-+-+--+--+-+--+-+,--+-(~7t-l-- ~-- ~-1--t ~;--r H. - * -+--+-t-+-

--*-+-- Cf) ct-+--*f-w+.-j,-+--+--f--+-+--+-+1-+ -+-+,-+--+-i-+--+---1---+-+--+--+--+-+-+-+-+-l--+-+--+-t -41/-A--++-+ --'- i '-t-t--+-+-l--t-+-1--++--+-+-++-i-+t- ~~-

__ : ~ - ___ , -i -+--+-+-*-1--+--+-,*-+--.--+--<---l---l-l--+-+--+--+-+-+-+-+--+-*-+-<- - -

->--->--- Z H-t--+-t-t--+-,--+-+--+--+-+-t--+-++-i-++-r+-+-t--+-+-+--t-+--+-,--++-hA--1 1/iy-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-1--+-+-....+-+-+-+-++-1-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-l

- H ~ -* - - ~ _ _j__ --+--.+- - +-+-1--+--+-1-+-+--+--+-+-+-1--+-+-.-+--,--+--+-t---hl'-+-+-c.-+--+-1---+-+-+-+--+-+-,-+--+--1---+-+--+-+--+-+-,1--+-+ i-+-+-1---+-+.-+,-j

--~- +--+-+--*,- - i - -l- +--+'-+--+-+-+-+--+-t .+-i---j--j-+--+-+-+--+-+-+-,i--,l,.-4-.4-I ~

+ - L- -

=:== i2 I I 4 00 0 f-+-<--+- *, -+--<--+---,__._+,--! - 0

/ I .L-I

->---, li::i I I ~-++-,,--+-+-+--t--+-+-+-+--+-l--++-1--++-+-+-+-+--t-H<\---i-+-+-l-+-+-+-+-i-+-l-+-+-l-+-+-+---!-++-<H---+-l-+-+-+---!-+-+--<H--+-l I

->----, o::; +-+,-l-+-+-1--+-l--+-+,--+--+-+--+--+---+-+--+-+--+-+*-++*+**+-+-J- 7*-- I

--1--4-+--+-l--+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+--t--+-+-t*-+ - * - -

-i E-,i t-+*-+-+-t-l-+-1--t-*+--r-+-+-t-+--+-+-+-++---+--+-+--+-+-+-+-+--Y-l--t--t--f--+-+--+--+--,,-+....--+-+--l--+-+-+-+-+-+-,-+--+---1--+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+--+---+-+-l U) - ;__+- - -~-- - L - -+--1--l* -.+ *l--11---+--+--+-+-+--+-+-+-+-4--+- -+-+A-+-+-i--+-+--H*-+*  : r +-++ ,-+-+--~ +-l-+-+-+-+1-*+*-+--l +-+-l,..++-l-+-l-+--1-1 1

t G I

/, i

>-+--+-t--+--+-t--+--+--ll--l---l---l--+-l-+--+--+--'--l--l---l---f--+-+-+-+-+--+-+--+--++1-0+--+-+--+-i--+-+---l-l-+-+--+--l-+-l-+-t-+--t--+-1---+-+--+-+ 1-+--f--j--+-+-+--+-+--+-+-+-+-j I-+-+ --+-+--+-+ -+ *+ *l-* *--+-+-+-t- l ** -f** -+--1--+-+--l--+-+--t- - f.- 1-- - - / ~- ,.;:.. +~-*, -- -- - ~*+-+-+-+-+-+-+-*-+ -l--+-- +-l--+--+-f-+-+,-+-+-1--++-i---+-+- __ *-** *-.,_ ,_

-+-+--+--+-+---+-+--1--+-+-+-+--+--+-if-+-+-+-

1-+- 3 0 Q O+---<--+--+-t-+-+-~--'>-+-+-+--+--+--+-+-++-h4--t--+-+-+-+-+ -+--r-+-+-1--+-1--+-+-1--+-+ *+-+-++-1-+-+-+--+-+--+-+-+-+-I--+-+-- , - - - -

1 1

>-+--+->---+-

I I/

I '

I I I !

  • I I  !

I/

I Boring No. P-10

-+-

Depth: 80'-81. 3' LIMESTONE WITH VERY MINOR I

I J QUANTITY OF CLAYSTONE ll'i I

I  :/

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

i d FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

~*~ ->--+- l OOO ........-+--'+-+-+-+I/-.4-+-+--+-+---+-+--+-+-+-+

i UNITS 1 and 2 1-+--+-+--+-t--+--+--+-+....--+*-+*+* +,,I-++ *+--1--+-1--1---+-+-+-1-- L-H-t-+--t--t-+-,--t--t-iH-+-+/--D,::V-H+, S'I'RESS VS. VERI'ICAL STRAIN USING SR-4 STRAIN GAGES 1-+-+-+-+-t -+--+ ~ t

...-+-+-+--+--+****+--'-"*--1--,1-1-Y+--+....-+-+---.--+*+-*+--+--+--+--1-+-+-f--+

11 FIGURE 2. S. 4-8

+--+-+-+--+--+--++o '" .~~~~-~~--~-er ,~""!"'---*,*.---------~,--,111'!""'!"'"!'1"!'~--~

1-+--+-+-,--+-t--f--+-jf O +--+--+-+-+--+-+-+

ST RA I N I N PE RC ENT -:-4-+--+---+--+-4-+--+---1----1--+-+-+--1----1--+-+-+--+f--+-+

+--+-+--+-+-+-*+....--+--+-t-+-+--+-+-+-~-+--t--11--t---t--+--+-+-+-t-+-+-;1-+-+-1-+-+--+-+-+-~--+--+--r-t- ++-+-+-+r-++-1~+--H--l-+-+-+-+--+-+--H--+-+--l

+--+-+--+-+--+-+---+--+-+---1---+-+--+--+-+-+-+-+-+....f--+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+-+-1-+-+-1---+-+--+-+-+-..L-j-+--+---+-+-+--+-+,-+-+7-+-+-+-+--+-if-+-+---l--+-l-+--+-+--+-il-+-+-~-1--

l

~-+-+-+-+- +-+-jl--+-+-~+-+-+-+-++-+-++-r++-+-+-+-+-+-++-il--+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+--+-l~+-H--l-+-+1-++1-+--+-+-++-11--++-l---i + -+-+-+-+-+-+--+-.........

~-~- H-tJ~ r-t  ! !

I I l I

I 1 fr

)

- -- +-

t- l -

~t-+ e-I i l

I

"-1-------r--

~tI

-+--+--+---t-t-+-+-+--+-+-+-;-t--f-t--+-+-++ -+-+ ++-+--+-+-i-+ -,+-+---+-,f--4-+-t- ' - __ ._,

--+--+-+--+--+---i-+---+---t-+-+--+--+--+--t----1--+--+---+--4--+--+--+-+---+-,f-+-+-+-+--+-t---+---t-i--+-+11-+-..__.-.__._,~

--+--+--4-+-+-l-t---t-f-+--+--+--+-+-+-+--+-+- -)-+* +-+--+-+ --+---+ -+-t -+->-+--+--I- +- + -*--+-----i i *- ' *

--+--+--4--t--+-l-t---t-t-+-+-+-+-+-+-i-t---t-;--+*++++i-+-f--f-l-+i~_f--+-+-+-J-f--f--f-+--t-++----i--

! I I I

-~+-+-+-+-1-+--+--i-+-+-+-+-+-+-1-t---t-;--+-+-"-+-t-- --+-+-1-+-+-+-+-t-+-s--+-+-1-+-+ 1 +--+--+--,~-~

+-+-t-1-+---+-+-+-*-++-+-+-+-+-+-+ +--+-+ + t- l

+-+-+--+--1-+---+-+-+-+-+-+-l-+-l--+---+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+*-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+--+---+--+-+-+--+-+->f-+-+--t-+-+--4

-+--;--+--t-+-1---r-t r- - -t--t---<-+-- -t-t--

+_tt+- 1*-~-u--+-+--<-+-1 1--+-+-+-l-++-,t-+-+--1--+-+--+--l-+--+-l--+-+-t-+--+--+--+--+-+-l-+-+-lt-+-+-+-+-+--+-l--t---t-ir+--f--

1--+-+-+-<-++--+-~1-+--+--+-+-+-+-+-+--+-1---+-+-t--+-+-+-1---+-+e---+--+-t--+--+--+-+---t-l-t---<-+--+--+-+--, . .,.,.

1  :

I

-i- _j_

--+ ++ f- ~->--r-tt * - ~tt+-_,___,__,__

,-f-+-i----- -

I ' I

+

i

-t t _

l- -1 I . -

I

-+-~i -

_._._,,__,_--+--.__._-+--+--+

t--+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+-+-+--1

~~~ ~+- --+--+--<-+ --+---+--+-+- +--+-4--+--+--<e--t--

r-+-t--+-~
  • --+-+-+-l--t--+e---+--+-+--+--t--+---t---t--~r-!--~-
  • -t-+-

+

-l-

+ +--,i--t---+--,-+-r

! I I

-i--+-1---

1 f--l--+-+-t-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+-+l--+-+-1,--+--+--t-+--+--+-+-+-+--l-t--+'-1-+-l'--+-+ - +- -t- r- -1--l- '--7-t- l-+--+---1--+--+-,---+-+-+--+---+-l l-+--++-+--+6000 t  : -t---~

t1:tt1~L-Il-rL,ll~~itt1:tl~~-tt~~Lt--,t

-r--~-

1 1l~w-~tJJ1Jj~JJjlJj~JJj~~j~_tJ,~tJtwtw~U~~~~a=--~i-ii-l~P=~

...... 1---1---.

-~-~- - t-+-*--+-+- *-

"-i-- - j t - +-- .

  • -H-** --+- :-

,,--t-rl-~ -

-t +- f--i-I

-+-+-+-+-+-+:-+---+--<,-++--, +-+-----!-*+1-+--+*--+-+--.--+-t--+-~-+-+,-.-

-+-,--+- ,--i-t-+,-.--+---++ ,~ -~+-L-i I

-+-+-+-+-+--+ +-"--+-+--t---t--+--t-*---t---+--<c-+--+--+--+-t--+--.-.-,-r-1--,---.---,---+-

-+-+--+--t-1,-+-t--+--f-+--+-t- :;;-...--T -


t--


+-t-i i ,_,_

-*j,,...,-'-+-....-~,"'+-+-+-l l--l--

i

-t-+_._*+-+---+--+1-+--+,--+-~--+-'

-i--L-. +-- ~~~

1----i--l-+l+-+--+--+-1/4---+-+-+-iH---+-l-+~-+-+-+-+-l--t+-r- COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S_

,_ -t-1-+-+-1--+**-~

-t -L - -- - -+---i--1-*---+---,*--+

2 0 OO -_,_ t

---<1-+-_._.._._....,._

-,ltJ_,-+ -i -t--+-+-+-l--1-+

".+

__.._._ _,_,-+-_ ___

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

._.__.._..__._ ,r- I H-+--1-+..,l,H---+-+ -+-+---+H--+-+--+--!.- UNITS 1 and 2

-- -~ - -- i- '- f-h-i--..1'*--**-+-+ -t--t- --~- -+--'1--1--+-+-,-+-+-,-+-+--+-+--+--'

STRESS VS. IATERAL STRAIN USING SR-4 STRAIN GAGES FIGURE 2.5.4-9 I

I I

I

' I I

I I I

--r-

+- ' I

+- 1--+ I l++ + : + +

i I--.__+,--.--+-_+,__+ - ,__ ~+- - +- ._,__ i I

_.__._-+--._.._-+-I--+--+_,:~+--+-+---+-+-- ---*- - --*---+-+--+-+-1-++-+-+-+-+-t-1~ i--~~ *-

1-+-+-+ +--+ -,-*--4--,1rr7-

'- ,__ - + ~-._ Q

--1--~-- +-+1* -I *1 I

--f--i-t-+-+--+-+-+-+--+-+- . . -r-

--n--+--+-,!t-+-+-+-+-+--+-+--+-+-1e-+-t--+-+-+--+--+-+--+-1-+---t-+-+--+--+

-r -'"-- -*t--

--t--t

~---~-r----*- -1*-t--"-_,___,_~_,_~__.

,i

  • +-.___1,.,,_1.--

I

""-~+.................++++-+-!-+-f

~fl..4...-!-l--!-4-H-4-1-1-+++++-+-H-+-t++++++-+---1-1-..+++++-H-+-t-+--+-++

+t-+_+t_ o _

-_ -+*.*_- +~I--++-+-+-+-

t

  • o2sI t-+--+-+--t--t- . oI so:::=:=:=:::=

l I ____ ,_ J J 1 l _

.01s Hf ,

'l+f.100 I I

-+--+--++""+

f-+-,11-+-+-+--t-+-+-!-+

~*- .12s 1 +-1-+-f

=._.: .1so

'-+-Hf-+-f-1--

'-'+-~--*-+- t - -+->-+-+-+-r+-+---+--+*+-+--.. *+---*-r- ---,- STRAIN IN PERCENT, ++-+--t--i'-+-+-+-+++-+-t-+--+-,r-+-t--ti-1

~~ ~ --t- .' +-*t, -

    • +*--H-1-+l - f- -+

1 r 1 1 1 r--t-, "~ 1-_~J~t::!=t1~~-tj=t1~~t 1::!=.+-1-_+_....;_,f-+_i--+L--H.__

- I- - H- j I---+ - 1

-+- -W---i-+-1, --l-+-H-+--1--+-+-+-1--+-+-H-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-I-+-+-+-+

0 l

[-+-+-+--+-+-f-+-+-t-+-+-+-!i-+-t-i-++-H--1 J

.......~~-1. :

]+t1

+ -+1-+-+-+-+--++-+-+I+--+--+-,!-+--+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+-i-+--+-+-+-+--+--+---1-i: -+--+---t---l-i'--+---l 1

1-+-+-lf-++-t-+-+-+-+-+--Hl'-++-t-++-t-+--i 1

, i

- I-

.. _I

+-t- ~-

I

-t*

,_,___ ,n(

i' 1-1 t t it *--

>--L-t- ~ t- t- t-I/

~t1. ~tr-'--l l

I ,__

L ...

  • -- - -t  ;  !--

11 t -i~~- u*--

i/

  • -++ '

I I

1--t- ~ t _,_ - I/

-t r} . .

t I--*-. +- -j--

l.. 4 '+ -

- J I

- t---t+

-- - - -t- -- 200 - -- - +-

ri r ~ -t- ,-- +-t r - +--*-

'l:i= ,

+

I - e--l-- +-- - - - ~ -

--+r r i f-- I I I 1/ l-

. t~-jL-tr~+- _J_t~ +-y v:-+ ~l+--tl - ,- 1-*-t--

I - -t I

I I

1 I I

t- +-' --

'~ttt-- t +-+-- *-._--+-... L-I-

L rf-.... -+ - I I -t-I Vt- dt L !- tt-*-+-

1

,--l l

'-->- --~ ,:

I.__ - .........

I c:I 175 I  !

-+-

I l 1- - r 1 , 1  ;-+'

L-Sample m*Htl I

' ' ' i ' ' I/

-,__i_ --L- L > - If-µ Started I

I I -t I

I

! - 1-l--,:__

-t -

t-++/-m*- ++-

- --i-Tt- -- - l 1--

I/

I -!->-Yielding Plastically

-- - --+

I I

I I + ,_ --L-t-7 t-~ _,_

Tj ;lt

.1.

-41 ' -rl-------------+

I I

' -r---i-;...-t -+- ,.j, r--

+-rt-t--... -+,..-t l-,

-->--1----.,___ __

I  ! - 7'

,150 '

I i~

' : -t :

~---L-- --~--

t--f-+

---r- -+ -r I

I I

t--

I I

--+- ..

-r ,_--J...j...

)_ l--1--

l i

--1--

-*-- l ,____

'1 I

+-*

I I

i 1 ~-tr:~ "~

I I

-~~-Lt f+

'""-!-1--L--

+ -

t- L_ --

~tt 1--J--l-.l--t

.. -+~ --l--

-r!

I I


+-t+ -- - - t--f--

I

.__,_ - -l-- -+- ,-.+-t* ___ , __ ,_

+

I -*--

'-~1 t+ --- *-'t- ..

+- + -

I - * - + - t--4

,- I __ .,___ --

I- 125 I I I I

++ if --l _J__ I I I

-t-I

-f+-*  ;~r -t-+-_,_

l- ! ' ! j  ;  !

' 1 +- -- -

d: f- 1-f I I

t .....

I-t---1---

>-t t--1-- . 0- I -

-- t - -

I 1

f .

}f+/-r l 1 _,_

--- -H ,__ -t1---  ! -

- - >---P-l -t

_,_ -z c-C/}

100 I I I

I

-~--T-

,J

/~ C. w

~--

-T

- -+-

I I-I I

_,_ - U)

-H i l I I /

I/

I I l ..'; .. ---+- -+- -t I

I l

I

_,_ -Cf} += I IJ --+ t I

I

,__ -1'.:4

-o::; I  !  : j I

'I I

~-t I

t+ . .

I  !

1--C- -

I 0 '

- E-1

-Cf}

I 75 I

~

I I/

I

'/

-,-t7"-

t+-t-1 -+- i I

I _,___

Bi -- ~t-I

!-'- --l-- L-+--,l......._ ' '--*

I

+r I II D  !

-- ---~--

.L l

I

--+

I I

I/

I/

,!/ ~

-l --

I I i

I I  ! I  !

I/ I/

-+- ...... ,

I/ 11 I/

Boring No. P-11

+- 50 -

I h' Depth: 73.0'-75.0'

' I/ I/ CLAYS TONE


*t*

I I/

],< I 1/Z.

I/

1/1, I/ J COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

I/ II

.... t-t-25

,_+ __ ,_ - ,_,... v f

'I ' FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I

I

!-,(

'J' I

'I UNITS 1 and 2 l/ I' I I/

I/

I,,

fl STRESS vs. VERTICAL STRAIN I/ I /I

-~-  !/

}

1, V

I/

If I USING SR-4 STRAIN GAGES 0

'J' V

,,,, FIGURE 2.5.4-10 I.J l.-.1 I

0 .05 .10 I  ; .15 c

.20 .25 I I I I I ' i I - - r-+-- -i-- I I I I I I I I I I I STRAIN IN PERCENT ...

I l l

I- - -

l- H

! I I I

Boring No. P-11 Depth: 73.0 1 -75.0' CLAY STONE COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS VS. IATERAL STRAIN USING SR-4 STRAIN GAGES FIGURE 2.5.4-11

I-+-+-+-+

- - *- fl~-- -+- - --

-+

l

+-

t

-1

  • t ITTTT!--

I  : I '. i t t t* +

- *- - - *+- *+- +**+- ++ +-'-***-

  • +- - - ~

I-+-*+- +-+--1-- - -- f-+++-+-+-++~-1--+--+-+-i-++-+-+-+--++-l*-+-..+--+. J.- t t- : +-+-+-+-+*+--l-+-+-+--1--l-l--H--l----- - -

1--+-+-+-+-+ --J.--f-+-++-l-!-++-f-t--!-+-+-1*--l--+--l---t- *t* l--J.-+ *- '**.. I f j t t t . ~ ~- *-- ,~-

t-+-t-t-t--+-+-H-t-+-+-+-1-+-+-+--t-H-+-+-t-+-+-H-+-+-+-+-!-+++-~+-+-H-+-+-+-.--* ~ tt-H~-+-H-++-+-+-+-H-+-+--++-1-++-+-+-+-1 I

t-++-l--+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+-t-++-t1-+-+-+-H'-+-+--++-1-+-++-+-+-+-H-++--+-+-i-+--+--1-_

1-+-+--+-+++-~-+-+-+-+-+ ...* .. **

1-1--t-t--+-+-+-+-1-+-+-+..+-+--+-*+--i-1-+-++-1-+-+-+-+-l-+-+-+-+-+-+-H-+-+--+-I- ~ * ,- 1 jIi i I 1* 1

! r t I 1 j

  • f [

...... ----* i *-* .

- --*- - * ~-+--i-+ ..+-+ +-+-l t, +-+--+,* t---+--+-+-+~1-l t-. 1 - i t- I

(~-r-*  ::

~- ~+-- I+-+

l+-.+--i--f--+-1-+-+-+--+-..jl*-*'- ++-+--+-+-+-I t-++-t-+-+-+-H-+-++--t-H-++-+-+-+-H-++--++-i-++1-H-+-+--+-+-i-++--+-+-!-+-~-l--l-.itu'-: ~ -+-~ ~

1 I I* -- - -'-+-t- - -+-1-~

t-++-+-+-+-+-H-+-++-+-+-+-++-+-+-+-H-++--+-+-,H-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+-+--+--+-+--+-i- . 1-..+r , , ~

~ +-+-+-1-+- -- ~- - *- +- f- -+-+-+--+---1

..C..

1-1-+-t-+-+--+--t-t-+-+-+-+*-+-+-+--+-+~*

I

~t=t=!=;t:!=:t::t=:;:t::t=t=!=tt!=tj-_t-1--*t1~~t.t1-=1~t.t-:t"1~~t.t1j~t.t-:t"1~~--.1-..

+-+---+-1-+--'-*t+--+*-j i...1-**. . *.;...**.~,- *

  • +' ..++

~

~~

-t t l+ ,

H--+- '

1

- r*t+. ~- -+---

- ' - .. - - ~

r+--+-+-+--t--l

/

I

!. - + . f-+

-- H-+ . H l t ~;--i- +-4 -+1/4:.. 1 / l-t-*l--+-t-+-t-+-1-+-t-+-t-+-l-+-.. J-+-~'--l--l I-+ -L*. -t - ~ - - -+-++--+-+-li--t--+-+-l-+--+-+-!--1--+-t--

+

-r--i--t-,--- -+1 .

1 t* -+ ..---r-i- .J .. -~ .. +1- h- -+

H ..

~ 40 00

(/)

.. _J__

I L--C-

' ---1---1----t--+-

-+-t- *'--4--+--+--+-+-t--+-f-~ t -L-+

' i '

.._......_1 r--~ ;..___.... ~~ -

--,..--.+--i---1--+-1--~-+--i- +-1..

t . +-+-

i

. -+--f-+-+-f--i-./-.+-+

i I I

-+- ++-1--l

+-,

-./---1--1-+-l---f-+--l-.+-+-I I

i ' '

I I

I i ..;_.f ,/

' /

2000 1-+-+-H-++-+-+-++-+-+-+--++~~Y+--+A-A-Boring l

No. P-11 I Depth : 81 . 3 ' - 8 2 '

i t-+-+-l-+*+-+-+ +--l--+--+-+--+-+-+--+-+-+-+--l-+--1,\/4--1--+-+-t I

I /

/

y LIMESTONE WITH CLAYSTONE INTERBEDDINGS

-*--~ **- ----------------- COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

V /  :

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2

,_.__,__._ _,__..._._.. + _,.-4---1--+-+--+-- .. -r-.4 I I

/ I/ / I --r-'-t STRESS VS. VERTICAL STRAIN USThG SR-4 STRAIN GAGES FIGURE 2.5.4-12

COMANCHE PEAK S.ES.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRESS VS. I.A.TERAL STRAIN USING SR-4 STRAIN GAGES FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4-13 I I.

r .10*

  • -+-'"*4--1-4 *

....,_1-....-1.-i.

0, :) ** t++c .075

+-+-+++++-++-,-+.t-H....+-1HSTRAIN

(

' \ ,,

\ '"

"' ......0

---~

230,000

'""'~

UNITS 1 &2 CLASS I

\ \

0+00 5+00 \ I 20+00

\ \

P-8*

UPHOLE SURVEY AND',

SEISMIC PROFILE 2 CROSSHOLE SURVEY p SERV~CE WATER DISCHARG~"',

CLASS I,,...___

SERVICE WATER INTAKE :-"7"+-----:;""-1--A'-...;..i CLASS I "

/

CR CIRCULATING WATER) 00

.'*. \ '" ., ---~-

    • -VI SCHARGE 00 m

I 0 '\

N N

I

~;~~OOWN \NOME~ DAM

. N 228,000

\

100 2'00 n1 COMANCHE PEAK S. ES.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 NOTE: PLOT PLAN SEISMIC PROFILES AND UPHOLE SURVEY DATA ARE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS ILLUSTRATED ON FIGURES 2,5.4-15 THROUGH 2 FIGURE 2, 5, 4-14 Amendment 67 February 5, 1988

(

N SLOPE

. .-----?

T PLANT

. CCRUSHE~

STONES)*.*

NORTH .. . l------

N 9900.00 *...

--******r*-*-- * * * * - * - - - - - - - - - - - - - * * - - * * * * - .<:: ':: * - * - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - 1

?>

L-26f TURBINE

.___.......--* TOE OF  :**

BUILDING SLOPE SLOPE

.\ i: 0 0

...: 0 0

.. " 0 N 9800.OJ .. :  ::_ w I *.

CONCRETE PAD .*. >*

I I

0 0

0 0

0 Amendment 67 0

0 g February 5, 1988 (J)

(]) SCALE 0 w r w COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

0 20 40FEET FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

REFERENCE:

LEGEND UNITS 1 and 2 TEXAS UTIUTES GENERATING COMPANY, FIGURE 2.4 40, "PLOT PLAN, DRAINAGE DITCHES 8 _ 1 AO SOURCE BORING PLAN AND LOCATION OF LAYOUT", MODIFIED FOR: AMENDMENT 1, POST-CONSTRUCTION CROSSHOLE L-i ~ LISTENING BORING JUNE 15, 1978 SURVEY BORINGS FIGURE 2.5.4-14A

070 TIMF - iSlAr*.;Ci;. PLCJS-S .':,t10W ir,r;::,fH,l,H*C,t.,

COLLE 1tl} q;,:[, 1'11 5**Vi:* PC !IFS t,.*t,'JF .1 SfV;:-R l. UJ-'.'t,TsOf\S A._ONG A SEi'S\UC C6C l INF FOR ClAR1frCA"'flQN, 'WO  :..[ Cl""

+ /r---APPIIRENT 5YM8(iL.(: .Jf,.-E ':;';,__ E'l y;_E:._:,._-_ -~D.-'t'f_ ,,~!.".'/,,,,~f*

rlc.,C_:~;::*,r/, '*It* '>Jni';.l'J ;;: l c'*.f-;,,_y b~*-.;*,

I . f"~!,\" Tf,i- _\:f'"T (, ,, fh:'.r,; ~~:,_ '- ,;tJ I+)

'----t-,-+-

12, 500 FT/SEC T:-\F SLl~SV~~A'.:"'.E SET ONS 'iH[lWN PR:Sf.\1 DIRECTION OUR t:VALUtl.TlON ,::F T,-,1:. MJST PH,.::Bt.BLf CHANGE I SUBS~ihFA::C ,:c~\[:, l"i')NS 8A-SED ur<'N (., JO,:

(SEF SITE MAP)  !~Tf;F?F><ETATIO~; :)F f'l'fSOiH.Y 4VA.U.8c.-f DATA. SC\'lE VAR:/',TJ.:>i*.J$ F"WJM THfSE

(/J o.aa CONDITIONS M1J$.T fl[ EXPECTED 0

z ALL VELOCITIES SHQWN ARf t.DPARf.NT 0 COMPRESSIONAL WAVE VE:LOCl~!ES u

~ ,( 3,:

-- - - 030 8600 ' f TISEC-..

LW 2 \

,~,~--

\_8600 FT/SEC:

17'. l 0 i I o

ic 0 .-o 1 i -I - 2700 I

[ __ , ___ : 2900 FT/S£C , 24GO fl/SEC--

.--' ______ l _____

I SP SP STATIONS 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 I 6+00 7+00 8+00 10+00! 11+00 12+00 13+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 NORTH I BORING P-9 BORING P-7 SOUTH I

.---:--==t~~,::-i=-+==-=-=-L~f-~£=-_it-~,;iEISM-1(=:P-l_R=EOFILE==---2--+/-;_r;br=ri*-~ 1 INTERSECTION WITH i 850 850 11 7

__;_.- 2 00 FT, sec  :

f-w uJ

2.700 FT/SEC SURFACE 2:2Jl~~=j~========~~~3/4:::::~L=-:l_-=:::::

LL b?~, j z

0 I

li,COC FT /S[C

---7 ----"-- 1 I I

<! EC:C _J ______ ~

> 800 w I

_J uJ l-- -

I I 2,SCO FT JSFC __j___j

1-.~,~:-~------------' /-_- _- _ ._-_ [_~-~------~I_~ ~~

I I

j __,___.c_____.__ 11 _ _

_I 750 COMANCHE FINAL SAFL TY ANALYSIS REPorn UNITS 1 illlcf 2 PEAK S E.S

s*

I I

' 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 13+00 14+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 STATl0NS 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 12+00 15+00 I i WEST B0R!NG P-6 BORING P~!~ EAST I i i i i I L] I  :'

i l

I i

I

. i  ;

I i

I INTERSECTION

SEISMIC I

WITH PROFILE I i

I

........... I,. ******** - -

1--1--1-=+

--~

I ,

I 1 - - - - ...

i I I

I' i '

I i

i i

I I I '

i' I I I I I

I '

I i I I I

i I 2700 ' ~T/SEC I I I i I

i 1

I 2700 I

f"JSEG ' l I.

I i

I I 1

.,-~,.---GROIJND SURFACF I

i I '

_L i '

j  ;

j i I

---.-- -- i ,. I '

I ' '

I

?60C* fT/S;::-c I I l .. j I 4- 2I0() fT fSEC i

I' ' I I I I i I I '

1 1 II

! II, 80 FT/SEC ~ f IS!::.C

~.200 I" f; Sf.C 12 ,60 i'
i i I I

I I I I i' I I I I COMANCHE PEAK S.ES FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 S[ISi'C PHCFlLL

.060 .060 040 10, 700 FT/ SEC


+------+--+~~~----+-----0---+-----

--+--0_/'I ___, 0/1 .030 o7T ~

+~

71

. 020 0

.010 .010 2200 FT/SEC STATIONS 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 10+45 WEST EAST BORING M-5 750 750


INTERSECTION WITH SEISMIC PROFILE 4 I I I I I I I I 1 2000 FT/ ~EC I I -- I - - - ~5000- - -FT-/SffC I - --=-=-=--=,,-'-_______

l __._l_____---1 725 z _ _ __,!-

0

~ ,----_.:..--

~ 700 l - - - - - - - - - ! - - - - - + - - - - + - - - - - + - - - - - + - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - + - - - - - t - - 700 w

_J 11,800 FT/ SEC 11,800 FT/SEC w

625 675 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SEISMIC PROFILE 3 FIGURE 2.5.4-17

.050 .---------~---~-------.-----r----~---~----r------.. .050

.040 fl)

~ .050 .050 0

(.)

w

(/)

.010 .010 1700 FT/ SEC o ~s=p:--_ ___.__ _ ___.__ _ _.,__ ____.__ _--"'-=!::---,..-,__ __.__ _ __.__ _ _.._----'lsf STATIONS t

5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 9+74 l

NORTH I RORING M*3 I. SOUTH BORING MO 775 775 I I 1-w w

INTERSECTION WITH SEISMIC PROFILE 3 I I

/GROUND I

SURFACE LL 750 I 750 z ', , .... l I I /

0

~

> 725

~....

1'~~~---~------~~~~-~~~-------- -

2000 j_

FT/SEC I 5000 I

FT / SEC I

I I 1

~

~ " 725 w

....I w 11,800 I

FT/SEC

- ~

700 I 700 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SEISMIC PROFILE 4 FIGURE 2,5,4-18

r----------------------------------------------------,,

TIME (SECONDS) 0 ,005 .010 .015 .020


...;.._---....;..,..---~....;;..;,

BOTTOM OF 10 l - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 CASING CLAYSTONE ZONE GRADES TO CLAYSTONE 20 - - - -

301----

40---- CLAYSTONE ZONE CLAYSTONE LENSES 50 CLAYSTONE ZONE 9600 FT/SEC CLAYSTONE ZONE

-t--

w w 60 w CLAYSTONE ZONE u

<I'.

lL a::: CLAYSTONE ZONE

(/) 70 Cl z

)

0 0::

(!)

3:

0 80

..J w

(D I

t--

a..

w Cl 90 CLAYSTONE LENSES I 00 1 - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - + -

110 l - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - + - - 1 , - - - - - - - - - - - 4 0

120 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

CLAYSTONE ZONE CLAYSTONE ZONE 140 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1

TIME (SECONDS) 0 .005 .010 .015 .020 10

~OTTOM OF CASING 20 ~

30

\

\~

40 1 I

I-w w 50

)

10,600 FT/SEC LL.

w

(.)

<(

LL.

0::

)

(/) 60 0

z 0 '

0::

<.!)

3: 70 0

_j w

fD

r:

I-

n. )

w 0 80 ,

90

\0 100 110 Tl z

l> (")

"Tl ci C ro 120 C "'C (/) ~

J:J C l> l>

117  ::J:

E:o Tl z 0:, )::,~

o<

z- m o N

0 rr, ('"') -; ~I

(.J1

+:>

...... <a

z rr, :s::

Ci) ,-c

(/) l> m

_. z N

I

s:: 0~ Ill l> 7Jm 0 I ("")U'l  :::::, ~

(.J1 ...... U') l>

a.. (/) ;;;,;::

-I....,.

-<o N (/)

z  :::0 <:n

)::,

m m

' 7J 0 (/)

0

TIME (SECONDS}

0 .010 .020 .030 .040 .oso 0 ----...----...-,---"T,-----.7-----,,

10 BOTTOM OF CASING i TRENCH

\

0 e Jaor1ng \ve,t1cal 20 Mj5 Face) 30 0

\

Vertical~

Face I- 5'-1 r- 11 I

~

l-5 -I 1

11 '-11

\ \

PLAN VIEW 1..1.!

1..1.!

IJ...

0 Vertical Face 40

\

1..1.!

u \'i£.\\=1\\\'=\\~\\<:§,\>,,2&@&.1

<t u..

\

c::

Ground V) Surface Q

2:

e TRENCH {CROSS SECTION) 0 0

c:: 50

\

u:,

3: TEST SETUP FOR PRODUCING HORIZONTALLY

\

0

..J 1..1.!

GENERATED WAVES QO

i::

Q.

0 e 60 l \

1..1.!

C e

70 ..

Shear Wove

\..- Compressio!al \..- Velocity wave veloc1ty 4,200 Ft./Sec.

o 11,000 Ft./Sec. e 80 90 ..

\

0

\ e Amendment 67 100 .. February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 UPHOLE SHEAR WAVE SURVEY (PRIMACORD METHOD) BORING M-5 FIGURE 2, 5, 4-21

GAMMA RAY ISTIVITY (COUNTS/SECOND/INCH) (OHMS PER INCH) 0 40 80 120 160 200 0 100 200 300 400 500 50 I-w w

LL

-z w

u

<(

LL 100 0:::

=i VI 0

z

=i 0

0:::

0 3

0 150

.....I

r:

I-a..

uJ 0

200 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELECTRICAL AND GAMMA RAY LOGS BORING P-1O FIGURE 2. 5. 4-22

GAMMA RAY RESISTIVITY (COUNTS/SECOND/INCH) (OHMS PER INCH) 0 40 80 120 160 200 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 --,.-----,----.-----.----r----.

_r- Ii-

_;;.;1r,,.

I<:;;;;__

I-w w

L_._

50

_;)

o;:;::__

z 1c:._

w u

<(

.r--

-~

L_._

a:: 100

)

(f) 0 z

)

0 a::

0 3

0 150

..J w

0 200--------+---+----,f---

250__.__ __.__ _....__ ____.__ __.__ ___,

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELECTRICAL AND GAMMA RAY LOGS BORING DI-2 FIGURE 2. 5.4-23

GAMMA RAY RESISTIVITY (COUNTS/SECOND/INCH) ( OHMS PER INCH) 0 40 80 120 160 200 0 100 200 300 400 500

""r=>

z

~

Z"'

~

w

~~

L)

<( 100 Li..

0::

~

(j) 0 z ~;-

> .'".i 0

0::

0 150 I

I-Q_

w 0

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELECTRICAL AND GAMMA RAY LOGS BORING DI-8A FIGURE 2.5.4-24

GAMMA RAY RES I IV I TY (COUNTS/SECOND/INCH) (OHMS PER INCH) 0 40 80 120 160 200 0 100 200 300 400 500 50 I-w w

LJ_

z w

L)

<( 100 LJ_

e:::

.)

(f) 0 e:::

<..J 3 150 0

....I w

co I

I-0....

200 250_,__ ___.__ _...,___ _.__ ___.__ ___.

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELECTRICAL AND GAMMA RAY LOGS BORING DI-9 FIGURE 2. 5. 4-25

GAMMA RAY RESISTIVITY (COUNTS/SECOND/INCH) ( OHMS PER INCH) 0 46 80 120 160 200 0 100 200 300 400 500 50 I-w w

l.J..

z w

u

<(

l.J..

100 a:::

(/)

0 z

0 a:::

0 150 w

aJ I

I-0...

w 0

200 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELECTRICAL AND GAMMA RAY LOGS BORING M-1 FIGURE 2. 5. 4-26

798' I 749' 802' 805' I" 78d3" 794*11*

EJE]

806' 1*

aoa 794*7* 767'1*

754*7*

c.t.ncou 1 STIDCT'll'UL UCD'ILL 772' 7*

D SD.IJCTUIAL FOUJmATIOII UC.AVATIOlt f10349.0 191§9,0 SUVIa VATU Pin tu*CB.

(CA'RCORY I IA.aJ'IIJ.)

CJ cuss 1 ILl:CTUCA.L DUCT IA.NU

( CATl:COllY 1 IA.CD'ILL)

Amendment 67 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

February 5, 1988 FNAL SAFETY ANAL'Y'SIS fEflCl{T UNITS 1 and 2

~ ,o ICM.L PLY YU:V PLAJIT UCAYATIOJ 11'11'1'1

I- :c z

<[

..J a.

+.;;;

It:

0 z

\

llmi ~...__,

',, - ' -' - - ~/, /.,.,

            • ~-

(:) /

A'lfFER ro 1/ FIG 2!i.4-27

-ffli

-~~

/ / *

/ REFER TO 1,,, FIG. 2.5.4-2

\

)'

~.=:.~/

~

fXTENSOMETER CUT OR FILL ELEVATION DRAWING TAKEN FROM Gl8BS a SCALE COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

100 0 I I 100 200 Fe.ET FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 CUT 8 FILL AMENDMENT 87 PLANT SITE DECEMBER 18, 1992 FIGURE 2 54-28

t- r 2

j' t2 D

§ l'c." 5r.l.~CTE.O ~t';,\e,1ANi WE.LL ~~OE.O LIMEe,TONE

~ z 0 M.A':J.\MUM. t>IZ.E. 4 11 UI (T"(P.)

TOP OF OOMPe1E.Ni IC..~K ,-~~~-=--

_a_.~_5_5'______2_G ~~LITI~~K~

TO tiE. VE:.t..lf lc:O E:>'f GjE.OL~151 IN F1f:.LO, N ~,000 \13,'j' SECTION A-A iTA'TION 0+00 TO ~TATtON i+50 NT.'$.

112 ~E.Lc.<JTcO J..e:.e1eTANT W~Ll ~~OE.O LIMf:.~iONE i.AA'l.l~tA ~IZ. 'i: 4-"

t-l ~)e,15.00 f?I. E. 10,7, \. '25 SECTION 8- B

~TAT ION 1 + 50 TC 51A.110N '2+1C N.1.S, COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PLAN UNIT 1 and 2 SERVICE WATER INTAKE CHANNEL

'OC,ALe.

f\t-, I I i CUT & FILL MARCH 31, 1980

"° 0 ZO 4Q <.O FE.E.T FIGURE 2.5.4 - 28A

COMANCHE FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

., , .

  • r1 UNITS 1 and 2 CLASS I BACKFILL
  • D MATERIAL QUARRIES FIGURE 2.54-29

TEXAS UTILITIES SERVICES, INC COMANCHE PEA~ STEAM ELECTRiC STATION TEXAS UT I LIT If S SERVICES, INC COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION TEXAS UTILITIES SERVICES, INC COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION MASON-JOHNSTON 8 ASSOCIATES, INC DALLAS, TEXAS MASON-JOHNSTON !I ASSOCIATES, INC DALLAS, TEXAS MASON-JOHNSTON a ASSOCIATES, INC DALLAS, TEXAS t,,,1 w

Q A,

15

  • COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PLANT SITE GEOLOGIC SECTION 25+*30

ELEV. OEPTli .,..,-,co i:

FOAM- SEISMIC WAVE VELOOTY lFEETtsECONOl OEPTli ELEV.

GENERALIZED UTHOLOGY

  • GEOPHYSICAL LOG FT.MS.l IFErn ATlON I IOAINQ l*\4 I IFEETI FT.MSL 2000 000 1000 1000 10000 12000 '4000 c:::::x:::-"-:=: LNUTONI INTtAIIEOOEO Wmi ~ -..: r.- ..;;::. ~r.:: *::. ..:-_, *

.....oo- .. Cl.ATSTC><< ~ --t t-- - - -

. .... _.... aoo-

-.** =*

- - _1,.

?

... 20 --~~- .i 6

'4 4

~ It.A 20 -

  • -*-- ....-- Ct.AY'ITCNE l(T(IIIIEDOEO Wini ~ G 4 ' A /;.

- :;::::~..=- LMESTONE ...,

- 40 LMESTONE II'

.. 4-

& d~

.. . ~

40 -

~

j) Cl 4

- ~ :.:.-..:=-~...:. ~ .. -:.:..: ?- E

  • ** *+--  :!J:..::::-::

6 ~

-*--=*-=r:-i=

---........~-

- ISO 60 -

    • -:..::~. **¥:== ;=,-:.Ji~i g

4 j) /l

- ao :t

  • 4 A . - ..

80 -

5u.

6 4 4 /l

... 100 - :<-:<-: Cl.AYSTOHE HnAIIEOOEO WITH lX Al /;.

100 -

>-700-,-

LIMESTONE 0 a:

  • IWIIII
    • 4 4 .:~ 4 O.z

' --700-z

- 120 LMESTONE

~

0

    • 4 ~ 4 120-
    • ) 4
  • ~

.... \40 140 -

-

  • 6

.... 160 160 -

- LMESTONE l'iTERBEOOEO WITH CI..AYSTONE

    • 4

- 180

- ** A A

-600--

- 2 0 0 - - SANDSTONE

-220 NTEABEOOEO WITH CI..AYSTONE AHO LMESTOHE 6

I I

4' tu

.. _____ I-

~

  • 4 4

-240 ------ ~ In i *-

4 4

>-2110

  • A 260-A A ....~ ~ ~ ~ :.::. :t.~ =-::: ~~:;; .:..~ .... .-::-f.. ~ ~!-  ; ~ :.?.:

... *-*--- z

- ~ ~ ;_::: *::= :;* ~]-~: :.i_i: ~t- .}:~t~: ~).: :::; .~  ;~

,... 280 3:

I-

  • /l 4 280-

.... **

  • r.:i --*=i 1!;_-=-* T"~ =*** :s=2~ ~~ t~~~~~~ ~:*:J:]i~::~: ~a~
    • 4 ._ -- ..;:; ~ . -~.:J ~~ -z-4 ;.i:}:::;_ .-:rr~:~ ***:~ .

0 250 1 3 EXPU.NATDH GAMMA, API APPARENT, G/CC 3 13 0 12

  • SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY October 14, 1988

.. CCMPRESSOHAL WAVE.

VELOCITY CAL.FER, IN. RESISTMTY, OHM NOTES: COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

11J SEISMIC WAVE VELOCITY PROFll:E IS FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT THE DATA PLOTTED IS THE AVERAGE VELOCITY. UNITS 1 and 2 I2J NO CORRECTIONS ARE APPLIED FOR REFRACTION PHENOMENA.

(3.) THE OBSERVED SCATTER IN P-WAVE VELOCtTY ABOVE 1115 FT. MAY BE DUE GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PROFILE TO REFRACTION PHENOMENA AS THIS ZONE CONTAINS SEVERAL THIN LAYERS AND SEISMIC WAVE VELOCITIES OF CLAY STONE.

( THIS F'IQ-US:U~ AC:>APTED P-R0"1 Re.I': 1~1) FIGURE 2.5.4-30A (SH 1 OF 2)

ELEV. DEPTH IAVCI i: GENERAUZEO l.ffiO.OGY F<:AM- SEISMIC WAVE VELOOTY IFEETtSECONOI DEPTH ELEV.

FiJ,CSL: tFEEll - - ATION GEOPHYSICAL LOG

tooo 4000 1000 1000 lOOOO 12000 uooo I IORINQ S-V. I tFEEll tFTJ,,B.

S,ANOS?OC t(ftAIIEOOED WITH a.Ant0HE

-r:-:

360-380 ii1ti

- ::~::::::::

,... 400

-I Cl.AY STOl'E I II)

...I I -

...I~

~~

r 1-I

<:l: I

~ - 480-
E

- I 4

soo-

-300- -

- --300 -

.,. 520*- - 520-0 250 t 3 EXPLANATX:)N GAMMA. API APPARENT, GICC 3 13 0 12

  • SHEAR WAVE VELC:X::tTY CAL.PER, N. RE~TMTY, CHM October 14, 1988 CCMPRESSOW. WI.VE A

VELOOTY NOTES: COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

11.l SEISMIC WAVE VELOCITY PROFILE IS FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT THE DATA PLOTTED IS THE AVERAGE VELOCITY. UNITS 1 and 2 12.l NO CORRECTIONS ARE APPLIED FOR REFRACTION PHENOMENA.

13.l THE OBSERVED SCATTER IN P-WAVE VELOCITY ABOVE t 95 FT. MAY BE DUE GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PROFILE TO REFRACTION PHENOMENA AS THIS ZONE CONTAINS SEVERAL THIN LAYERS AND SEISMIC WAVE VELOCITIES OF CLAYSTONE.

FIGURE 2.5.4-30A (SH 2 OF 2)

VIEW LOOKING EAST 1 11

  • * * * * * * * * ************ -810 0

...~... .. ...*......

....... ....... ... .. ... ..*. ~* ...... *..

    • * * ***********************o******
  • * * * * ****** 0 ***
    • * ****** 0 ********* * ********
  • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
  • SERVICE WATER
  • * * * ******************* 0 *****
  • * * * * * * * * * * ****** 0 ******
  • *
  • t * * * *
  • t O O t
  • t t * *** * * * * *
  • * * * * *
  • 0
  • o O ** *
  • * * ** *** * * * ' * ** * * * * * *o o * * * * **

t **

INTAKE

=
=:=t=:=:=::=:=:=::::=:=:=:=:=:=:- -.:. *: .... : : ::- *:.-: :.-.~ \** :-: ::.*:.::::

-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-::-:-:r.. * * * * * * * * * * *********************

STRUCTURE

...... *.**:*****=:~~-***:*********

=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:::==:=::::::=:=:=:=:=:=t=:=:=:=_

. . ......... . -1ao' a*

LEGEND

- UMESTQl,E COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S .

-- CLAYSTONE FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

  • - UNITS 1 and 2 SERVICE WATER INTAKE CATEGORY I BACKFILL Amendment 67 CATEGORY I BACKFILL February 5, 1988 FG.R: 2
  • 5
  • 4- 31

I D PLANT GRADE 2' a* MINIMUM J_ ELEVATION VARIES VARIES SERVICE WATER PIPE TRENCH J J PLANT GRADE

.*; *:: ~:*.

...*.:~.

  • ..*=*:

. .*.f'O"**.....

.....MIN.....*

  • f'O" MJN 2'0~ r LEGEND o:

2' MINIMUM b... . ~MIH1 . * . l_ CATEGORY I 8ACk'.FILL *

  • . ELEVATION VARIES CATEGORY I VARIES D. CATEGORY I 8EODING ELECTftlCAL DUCT BANK Amendment 95 February 2, 1998 COtilANDE P£Al U.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORl lNTS land 2

  • TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS CAlEGORY :I BACKFILLED EXCAVATIONS I D -------=*~-----'------.::.*:._____ I

ELEVATION 805 .5 CONTAINMENT ELEVATION 793' 3"

\

REACTCR ELEVATION 768'11" N

_(_ s LEGEND (F COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S FRAC TUR£ FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FRACTURE MAP UNIT I FOUNDATION 10 FIGURE 2.54-330 Amendment 67 February 5, 1988

N s

REACTOR ELEVATION 768' ti"

/ CONTAINMENT ELEVATION 793' 3" TOE OF SLOPE ELEVATION 784' 7" LEGEND

\._p FR~CTURE IN~:CA TOR COMANCHE PEAK S E S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FRACTURE MAP UNIT I 10 FOUNDATION SCALE

!FTT1 F'Gl.'RE 2 5 4-33b Amendment 67 February 5, 1988

I


1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * - - - - - - - - - - -------- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -*

180" s

.F I

I i I I I l I LEGEND

~--~_-J1 CLAYSTONf

-*-- - **-- --***-* --==-**__-=-*:__*:__= -:_____ _:_*.::_:__-*:____*:_____:_-::-=-=-*-_:_**=-=-=-**-==--==--=====::::::j

---=-..::*_:_:_____:_-:_= m LIMESTONE 180 270° FRACTURE w INDICATOR COMANCHE PEAK S. ES FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FRACTURE MAP UNIT 10 REACTOR WALL SCALE (FEET) FIGURE 2.5.4-34

LEGEHD CUYSTONt teo* 270° s w LIMESTONE 0£NTAL C -

D BACKFILL I D ROCK REllKMII PER DESIIIII l f FRACTUII£ I-TOIi 210*

360° COMANCHE PEAK S.ES.

w N FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS FEPORT UNITS 1 and 2

.5 FRACTURE MAP UNIT 10 CONTAINMENT WAU.

SCALE FIGURE 2.5.4-35

!FEET]

UNIT I PHOTO GRIDS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 281 Zl I 26 I 25 I

24 23 I 22 I 21 I 20 I

19 I 18 I 17 16 I 15 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I i j I I I I I I I I I o* 90* 180° CONTAINMENT BUILDING I

!CBH-28}

I I I I  ! I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I  !

41 13 12 I II I

10 I 9 I 8 I

1 6 I 5 I 4 I ~ 2 I I I

28 I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I

1ao* 270° 360° CONTAINMENT BUILDING I (CBH-28)

I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6 1 !l 9 10 I II 12 13 14 1:, I 16 11 Ill 19 I 20 21 I 2 3 4 I I s I I I I i I I i I I I I I I I 5 I$! Lift I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I

,_ I I I

! I I

-, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I 14 13 12 II 10 9 8 7 I 6 5 4 I 3 2 I I I I I i I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I 2nd Lift I I I I I I I I I I I I o* 90° 1eo* 270"

' 3,so*

REACTOR CAVITY I

st Lift (Cl-RC- l-21) 2nd Lift (Cl-RC- 1-14)

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PHOTO GRIO UNIT I CONTAINMENT ANO REACTOR WALLS FIGURE 2.5.4.- 36

CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-1 CONTAINMENT WALL

' PHOTO #CB-1-2 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO #CB-1-3 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 1 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4- 3 7

CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-4 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-5 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-6 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 2 of 21 REFERENCE FIGUR~ 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2. 5. 4-37

CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-7 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-8 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO#- CB-1-9 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 3 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4- 3 7

CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-10 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-11 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-12 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATI-ON PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 4 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2. 5. 4-37

CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-13 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-14 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-15 COMANCHE PEAK S.ES.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 E~CAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 5 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36

CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-16 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-17 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-18 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 6 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2 . 5

  • 4 - 3 7

CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-19 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-20 CONTAINMENT WALL WALL# CB-1-21 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 7 of 21 REFERENC,E .FIGURE 2. 5. 4- 3 6 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4- 3 7

CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-22 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-23 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-24 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 8 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4- 37

CONTAINMENT WALL l PHOTO# CB-1-25 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-26 CONTAINMENT WALL PHOTO# CB-1-27 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 9 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGt)RE 2 *5

  • 4- 37

CONTAINMENT WALL PHOT O# CB-1 -28 REACTOR WALL PHOT O# Cl-R C-1 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOT O# C1-R C-2 1st LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Shee t 10 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4 -36 FIGURE 2

  • 5 . 4- 3 7

REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl- RC- 3 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl- RC- 4 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC- 5 1st LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 11 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2 . 5 . 4- 36 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4 - 3 7

REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-6 1st LIFT

  • ~fer - ', ,. ~

1/4)

~ -

~ . ~--

-~-

,.:r~

REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-7

.-.;;:::,, 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-8 1st LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 12 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2 . 5

  • 4- 3 7

REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-9 1st LIFT

~ACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl- RC-lO 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl- RC-11 1st LIFT COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 13 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4- 3 7

REACTOR WALL PHOT O# Cl-RC -12 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOT O# Cl-RC -13 1st LIFT REACTOR i\f ALL PHOT O# Cl-Rc -14 1st LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 14 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4 -36 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4- 3 7

REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-15 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-16 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl- RC-17 1st LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 15 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4- 3 7

REACTOR WALL PHOT O# Cl-R C-l8 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOT O# Cl-R C-19 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl-R C-20 1st LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Shee t 16 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4 -36 FtGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4- 3 7

REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-21 1st LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl-RC-.1 2nd LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-2 2nd LIFT COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2

.' 1, .

.~ :~--~~<*~:~1:,--

  • . 1 '

EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 17 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4 - 3 7

REACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl-RC- 3 2nd LIFT

~*I

,.;..- -~
  • ~ *'~

r.:~*-

r,r,*tlJ t !

, .. - *..," ,. * ~_ I'

  • ,' I lr t-'.* 't ' ,' ..... ' \..._ ,, ...:- t.., "' .- "
  • l .;Jf t .. -ti -:", . -,/_ .

"' 1* -~:i ~ . ¥'! 1- 1

l . ~ - - ~ : - ;'" 'L,..~*....:--'<- ',I

~ i '.t-1...*"' ,. ' ' . . - ..f~,~ ~"';t:._. :;;.~ *:J .. -';, ~

1*- *"**;:;;:-i . ':",-.)0';- ., ,..*,,.~ :-,.,,* . _ __,,,.-;'41i** .,, .. ~1-~"'-1/2';~

~ -*~ ;.~

1~-;;~*~-~~1;**'2 ~;.flof.*: .; _;_ {-'~ : * .- *:..:_-t.*~*~:**,t.t~.:::::~~ ~ .~.- -<.*"J 0:-- ~~-~l/~!;.J1.

REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl- RC- 4 2nd LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-5 2nd LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S. E. S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 18 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5 .4- 36 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4- 3 7

REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-6 2nd LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-7 2nd LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-8 2nd LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 19 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2 *5 * -

REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-9 2nd LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-1 0 2nd LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-1 1 2nd LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 20 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-3 6 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4- 37

REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-12 2nd LIFT

'~ REACTOR WALL PHOTO# Cl-RC-13 2nd LIFT REACTOR WALL PHOTO # Cl-RC-14 2nd LIFT COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1.and 2 EXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS Sheet 21 of 21 REFERENCE FIGURE 2.5.4-36 FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4 - 3 7

810 802 799.5 810 WEST WALL r,o

~t:

U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 0

I0 20 ....

c:

C!)

30 w 3:

40 >-

CD

  • - er 50 l.iJ V,

n::

-=:I GO 0 0 I-70 z

w

(.)

a:

w 80 0..

90 100 0.002 o,oo

.,.,,.----------,-!*======:GR:,:t.v:E:L:======-------,----S;...A_N.;;...D--.---------1 COBBLES Cccrse Ftno I Cccr~o r.~Gd:um Fine SILT or CLAY I , L.----!----+--+-~-+---+------1------,---------:l L----*.1

  • ~*~L,~-~-......___.__~~--i-------

-+ I

-: I '

I 0

u  ;

,__, :i

-~'! J lO

.
1- !'

-I~-:-~-+- 20 !-

J , ,LL-. :t:

-*~Lf. 'l

  • 30 C!)

W

--i--*--:1

  • I 1 I

~

+--*l ,_ L.. ,. 40 >-

_l il m r

i-'

__;L__r-:!-- -JL . _ a:

$0 UJ

~ I . I I ~

~'. --:-l - I i I <t:

8

  • ~}-*--1---r~ :r 60 1-

--,--~--T .r . . . -

\I \ . - 70 ~

~-c*,-*

--; \-+-~l iL.

I I

tJ 0:

w i \l .j T. 80 ll.

-\, -
--11J!t1 -,_j_

r-,;._ -nnn-

-r---,i*-,. I I 90

.,. " f 1! , I ,

-H- ._. ._L,.________ !CO 01 005 00~ 0.01 0.005 0.002 o.oo COBBLES

STANDARD SIEVE SIZES N,-~1 ;!1;1~1

~1

-- Q

il' 6  ;;  ;
I6 10 16 ,() 100 200 3f," 24' :a" 12" a" 8 i 14 i 18 50 I 70 I 140 100 I 30° :21°! 15°: 10" I I I I I

I 5**

I . I

~

. I 1r,

-... ~ \, I ' I 0

. i ' ' 1:

"\. '\'JlI'., . ' .

.  :'\ ~

I 90

,;I I

. -. I I0

  • 1 I:'-. \ r *
  • t-- --* *\ti:~ .--:}i

'I

  • -+: '

I 80 I J ,- 20 1-1- . I ' ' ~I I

t:

£2 70 . . I

  • * '\' f  !'\ ' l
C:

~

tfff bJ '  !* ,- \ . ' ' 30 lJJ

~ . .

I I I

'~\-+~-* r I

I i

3:

.,  : -i--;* 40 >

i r ' I ' \ i \ I al 50 I

r- ..

' \ '*' i\ il 50 bJ a::

I

' .. \ i ! h I. ,--: '

. (I)

!t:

' <(

J I

i l i

. ..ii

'  ! I t so 8

!  !  !,  ;-:, i '* \ \ I L i'

i 1-

. ' i \ \ \ I ffiu I

0 I 70 I.I.I I

\. \ I

a. I. I r-, a::

.. *\

~

j\ I_ UJ ft-~-i-2 ' t - ~F ( ' \.' 80 a.

. \ '\

I

~ --,~f-I'\ r'-.. \ ;I I

\.

0 **

LL .

i '

. ~+-+-- -;-r ~ "- ~ rr 90

,.,,lJ'~ . I I

I, ..1..-* .l..... *

  • I I I i'~ i 100 o.,.,..,r '!~1.0 ~.r.u *.:r.~fTFRS I I

'*'1000 100 '.jQ iO Go~i!\' 2 C.!l o.zs 01 0.05 0.02, 0.01 0.005 0.002 o. OOI GRAVEL I SAND SILT or CLAY COBBLES i Co~rse 1 Fine I Coars0 I M0dkim Fine JULY 27, 1978 AMENnMENT 2 Kme

- ** ,,,,, - ~- ,~,., ,,.~.,.,,.,._

Sp!3 No.

No. Depth  ! Le;o:-id LL ?L Pf LS C!e:c:fc::1Ca:i II SUBJECT COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT l UNITS 1 and 2 i CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST PROGRAM SAMPLE .;i:2

__ ,_.;,..._. L_L___ . ., .. ~ --* --*~

  • y_ C-33 FINE GRADATION AGGREGATE i

l ,~  ! i i I FIGURE 2. 5.4-388

- -,. j( ~. 'f' . *n*"'""*

~"""-'.'"' .** e* ~,

i

914

/62-610 0

(")

0 305 0 a:,

?.54 0 c.o r- 20.3 2 rr:

(/) 152 4 101,6 76 20 50.80

~

25 40

~

15 B8

-~

~5 C

6 .350

(/)

4 760 CJ)

--f 2,362 l>

'1,951 z I. 39 7 0

)>

1.168

_Q.;~  ::0 0

I

-~~ CJ)

I , ~

I

~1_7 (Tl

(/)  !

C m _.Q:.?.t5 (Tl c.. .9 246 1'11 ..Q.3Q!!_

()

-I CJ)

_9,147, N

l Q.104 (Tl CJ)

~74 z

t> n ro c_

C (J)~ r

)> )> -<

C z- ~ n ""Tl z N

--J

-i -< :c (J) )> rn c..o

--.J

_. z (X)

)> --0 DJ rn

i ~ )>
0. (J) ;;x;:  :::r:,,

3:

N (J) f77

z

(/)

0 CJ m rn 3 rr1 7J z 0 (J)

-I

0

-i N

-I PERCFJ'-rr COARSER BY WE iGdT

U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES

~

'°"'"1~-

0

. ;e Q "'tf'lN 0 0 ,-.: <t ,t

~I IO N ie Q

0

,xi ai ~I '<t N--

00 '<1' d

2 0

36" 24" 1a" 12 a" 2" I" 5/8" 3/8" 1/4" 19 IG ~o 40 60 100 200 1 ~o" :21": ,~ .. : 10* 1 e" I I 1/£ I 31,4° I 1/t".

I I 4 8 1 14 : 18  ; 35 j 50 I 70 140 I I

' I 0

I0 I

20 I-

-*-*-  ::r:

,:.!}

-- 30 w

~

40 m >-

a::

50 w VJ a:

4 60 00 l-

~-~-- 70 l.d z u

- a::

w 80 0.


go

!00 0.002 o. 00!

COBBLES SILT or CLAY Coarse Fine I Coarse Medium Fine JULY 271 1978 AMENDMENT 2 Ii-;.S.,!;.p_!s_!'

Hole No. Depth J..;.o.--+-_ _ _ _+-_ _ _

Legend LL PL Pl LS

---t-_-t-_ 1r----

I I C!assl1iectkm ---1--------------~ SUBJECT 1

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST PROGRAM i-----+------4----f---t--t-+--+-----;--------------+I SAMPLE.tt4 GRADATION

________ ~CROWDER- QUARRY CRUSHED STONE

---"'*--~ h F~GlJRE 2 .5.4- 38 D

0 8

~

~

Cl) u a::

I-u w

..J ID w 'It d <I)

E ti 0 L&J a:::

<{

w I- ..J

(/)

0 _,J

(..)

(/)

<{

a:: 0 w

ii:: I-

<{ c:t w :E flt 0.. (.) Q. LL 0.

0 0 0

w :<{ ID 0

r:

u a::: N 0 CJ) z c:t W I-

-II II a:

L&J

E 0

u ~,; \~ (:)__

al 2 I 0 z

~

~

0 0 I() 0 It) 0 0

I()

,.._ 0 IO ,.._ It') N 0 N

0 0 I()

0 N

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0 q 0 0

(U!/U!) Nl'i~lS 30nll1dW'i 31enoa Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TYPICAL CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST RESULTS FIGURE 2. 5 .4 - 39 Sl-£ET I OF 4

0 8

z 0

...ti (I) 0 a:

I-0 w

...I w Wi--

~ rt')

~w~ 0

< $ en LI.I

.... (!)

0 ccII -

0 LaJ

.J

(/) < (/) 0 llC;W >-

0

< z

~ i.L -

rt')

Lu'?,-...

()

Q. -Ill Q,,

u..

0 u:C u ~o

  • 0 Z -0 0::

<1: ~ II 0::-

~ t- LaJ 0 -cs II a:,

u <

U')

)o ,tf ~

=>

0 z 0 0 I()

0 N

I()

t,...

0 ti')

l()

N 8 IO 0

N 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 ci 0 (U!/U!) Nl\f~!S 3an111dW\f 31enoa Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TYPICAL CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST RESULTS FIGURE 2. 5.4*39 SHEET 2 OF 4

0 0

0

~

~

I-(/)

u 0:

I- C\I u

4J

..J u

IJJ 4J

~ ~

I()

(/)

0 IJJ 2

ct:

- II 0 _J 4J z

0::

0 u 4J I-(/)

0 I-(/)

(..)

(/)

4J lll:

ct:

4J a..

2

- -IA Q. LL 0

IJJ 8. 0

(/) 1'- 0 w 0 0

.r u 0::

z --

(X)

~

II a::

ct: z II

~

w IJJ 0

u ~ ~lb -~ 0 CD z

b V

0 0 0 ,._

I() 0 I() 0 I()

I()

80 C\I 0

0 in 0

C\I 0

0 0

0 0

I()

0 0

C\I 0

0 0 fJ!/U!) Nl~lS 30nll1dW'I 31snoa Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TYPICAL CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST RESULTS FIGURE 2.5.4-39 SHEET 3 OF 4

8

~

F r!(/)

uu ii: ~

I- (/)

u LtJ

..J

  • t.O LtJ LtJ 0 -

z 0

2 I- Q:

II ~ ~- 0 en L&J ct (/') (/) 0 w ..J

~

LtJ I- ~ 0 0

(/) ..J x>-

ct 0::

LtJ 0::

ct ... -u, ~

8 0..

LtJ

o

(.I

,-..; 0 Q.

0 Q 0:: N 0 z ~ -

ct ;t 2 0 II i:.,

(\J 11 0

0 a:

L&J 8 5)c lo CD

E
)

z A

0 0 0 0 I()

~

~ ~

I() I() C\I 0

N ,-.. (\I 0 I()

0 0 8 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 (U!/U!) Nl't~lS 30nll7dW't 31enoa Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TYPICAL CYCLIC TRIAXIAL TEST RESULTS FIGURE 2,5.4-39 SHEET 4 OF 4

SOUTH NORTH BORING P-25 BORING P-10 860 EX1ST11'lG GROUND SURFACE: i OORl~IGP q i r--.... j j

BORING P - IS

MODERATELY TO SEVERELY I --- ~r---._ SOR INS P-9 WEATHERED ROCK OCCA so1~1
.LL '(

840t------------


---t=c.\-:::...._-_--++--c::--?--,.-,,...;;=-**- -- I-

~, r - -:!:-. :----:_ - --::::::--. l__

-80R11"Nf-'"':;-- - -------

I

_ WEA THEREO !9 A SOIL (ON_SISTEC.C.N"'-'CY~_


~

~ro, .:::~:ti~----~/


tf::1/4----l!!f---:-:--;,--.....JJ ----...., -..__

a20 1 --------------------1??1--- OVERBURDEN

---t;S--=- t.>!L),NG "-

8001---------------------- \

780f-----------

UL.

7 4 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----***--*- --*---t;e-----** - ~ * - -- = ------.-+------- -

I

.c IC 720t---------------- '"

~

¥ 700 1 - - - - - - - - - * - ~

680t-----------------*---- --

=

5 GLEN ROSE ~ FORMATION Ill ..* ,.**. - **

le 6001-------------------t~8;_______,a________.f1

~~i 5aoi-----------------------

~ TWIN

{ctt-,_ _ _ _ _ ,,__

MOUNTAINS

---** "**-***--*******-**¥A FORMATION Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 560 1-------- - - - - - - - - - -------1~ ;r


*********----*-**-lr,ii-------

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

540 KEY FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ifj LIMESTONE (f]sHALE

~CLAYSTONf-BOTTON OF FOUNDATION MAT CROSS SECTION A-A 1

UNITS 1 and 2 200 0 200 400 LJSANO'.>TONE- - UPPER LIMIT OF WEATHERED-TO-FRESH 1

ROCK WHICH DOES NOT CONTAIN SOIL LIKE ZONES.

scale feet CROSS SECTION A-A Refer to Figure 2.5.5-5 fot Location of Cross-Section FIGURE 2. 5. 4- 40

800t----------

780 T.G.PE 760 740 I-w w 720 LL

~

70 z

0 j:::

~ 680 w

_J w

660 640 620 TWIN MOUNTAIN 600 ~--- -*---- FORMLU'.ION Amendment 4 January 31, 1978 500t-------

560 i - - - - - - ~ COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 5 LEGEND 1

UNITS 1 and 2 KEY:

~ LIMESTONE 0 SHALE CROSS SECTION B- 8 200 0 200 400 1

~ CLAYSTONE ....,.. BOTTOM OF FOUNDATION MAT CROSS SECTION B-8 Refer to Figure 2. 5. 5-5 for TTrn W'&1-rwll~IJ o8bw~~1rfb~;;~0to~t~H scale fl.

Location of Cross-Section t..2J SANDSTONE LIKE ZONES.

FIGURE 2 .5. 4 - 41

24.9 KSF MAX.

Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FOl.NDATICN PRESSURE DISTRIBurICN UNDER CONTAINMENT DURING SSE FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4- 4 2

I I I I I I j i I i I i I f I I  ;

I I I I I I I i I I

.. I I I I I  :

r '

[ I I I

I I t r '

I I I l I I I I I

TOTAL SWELL (INCHES)+-+---HH-H-+--+--++++---+-+---+---,-+---...--w 1

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,+-+-+-----H-+-+-i-++-+--+--+-+*+ri-0

  • 4 ......._....._,_..__.__ 0
  • 6 O
  • 8 -+--+-+-4-+---1->-+--,_---'-~ ~~1 ~

0 I O* 2 j i l l I 1 j I I

0 f I J.,,

I

I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I

SLAB l I

' i I I I I I I I I I

2 1 I  : I I

I

~~-t-+~~1--=t~ti~~1--;t--z,t-;_f--tt---+-t1~t-i-~+:_t+~ti-=++:_i-+~ti~1=-l-+~ti~:..t+~ti~tt+~i.~~t.ij~:~~ti::_{j1=-:--:i~t-ij  :

1 1 4  : I I H-++-1r++-.--+-r1- L I I

I I I I I i

' . I I I I I 1 i I I I I I

I  ! I I I I l I I  ! I  ! i I

'  ! J  : I I  ! I

' I +-

EXAMPLE (Hypothetical) :

! I . ! I i

i::: I I ( l) Equivalent slab thickness= 2' 8 I

( 2) Claystone layer is 1.0' below p... 6 r I I I  !

I li:i.

Cl I I bottom of slab and is 1.5' thick I 1 I

LIMESTONE I

( 3) Total heave at top of slab=

! i heave at "A" minus heave at "B" I =0.17"-0.08" I

i I =0.09" 8 i I I I I I I I i I I I I ' I

I I I I i

I  : I i I I I I i I I I I J I

' I i

I 10 I

I I

, I I 1 I I I I I l I I I

, i I I T

I I I I I I I

_l___ I I Amendment 67 I I February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

I FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EFF'.ECI' OF CJMSTCNE I rn FOUNDATION I 7 i I FIGURE 2

  • 5
  • 4 4 3 I I

TYPE MATERIAL - BEDDING SAND 5 --

- KEAN RELATIVE DENSITY= 90.551 STD. DEV. = 7 .11 N = 18 4 - ....

lZi 801 RELA TIVE DENSITY

- MINIMUM ALLOWED 1 - ...

0 48 50 52 5'1 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 e2 81\ 86 PB 00 ~2 ~4 % ~8 100 102104 1C6 RELATIVE DENSITY COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 RELATIVE DENSITY TEST

SUMMARY

Amendment 67 FOR BACKFILL AR~UND ~tEi~~y I ELEC. MANHOLES ND OU K February 5, 1988 FIGURE 2.5.4-44

25 - TYPE MATERIAL - CRUSHED STONE

< 2" SIZE MEAN COMPACTION = 102.51%

STD. DEV. = 4.76 N .. 108 20 ....

--* ... 95'.t COHPACTION MINIHUH ALLOWKD 5

0 I 88 90 'J2 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110 112 114 116 118 PERCENT COMPACTION COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PERCENT COMPACTION TEST SU"'1A.RY FOR BACKFILL AROUND CATEGORY I Amendment 67 CONDUIT February 5, 1988 FQff 2.5.4-45

10 TYPE MATERIAL - BEDDING SAND 9

-- MEAN RELATIVE DENSITY= 90.104 STD. DEV.= 6.85 8

-- N = 40 7 ....

r.

Cl.I 6 .... 80% RELATIVE DENSITY

~

Cl.I MINIMUM ALLOWED

~ 5 _,..

~

0 Ai::

fz.:i 4 - ,..

I 3 ....

2 ,..

1 _,_

0 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 ')4 96 100 102 104 106 RELATIVE DENSITY COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 RELATIVE DENSITY

SUMMARY

FOR BEDDING AROUND CATEGORY I Amendment 67 PIPELINES February 5, 1988 FIQff 2.5.4-46

10 - TYPE MATERIAL - CRUSHED STONE

< 2" SIZE MEAN COMPACTION - 102.10%

9 ... STD. DEV. = 3. 94 N = 29 8 _,_

7-95'1 COMPACTION MINIMUM ALLOWED 6 .

3 s -..

rn E,-1 ti.)

~4 r-i:,,.

0 i:1111 f;:l 3 -,..

I:z: 2 1 -~

0 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110 112 PERCENT COMPACTION COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PERCENT COMPACTION TEST

SUMMARY

FOR BACKFILL AROUND CATEGORY I PIPELINES Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 FIGl.ff 2.5.4-47

40 -.. TYPE MATERIAL - CRUSHED ROCK

< 2* SIZE MEAN COHPACTIOH

  • 101.251 STD. DEV.
  • 4.46 N
  • 134

-e 30

  • I- 951 COKPACTIOR MINDtUN ALLOWIID

~

fl)

~

t

=

I 20 ..

10 -~

0 C4 86 88 90 ')2 94 96 93 I r I 100 102 104 106 108 110 112 114 116 PEUCENT COMPACTION COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FNAL. SAFETY ANALYSIS REPON'T UNITS 1 and 2 PERCENT COMPACTION TEST SUMMAR FOR BACKFILL AROUND THE SERVIC Amendment 67 WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE NOTE: Accepted Values Are~ 95% February 5, 1988

CELL 40 CELL 40 CELL 20 courn courn 36 C0UNT 18 32 16 28 14 24 12 20 10 16 16 8 12 12 6 8 8 4 4 4 2 0 ....__ _ _ _ _ _ __j____J'---==i...-

0 0 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 25 90 95 100 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

% PASSING f~ SIEVE  % PASS ING #8 SI EVE  % PASSING #16 SIEVE SPECIFICATION LH'ITS 95-100% SPECIFICATION LHUTS C0-100% SPECIFIC,\HON UliITS 50-8!i%

CELL 22 COUNT CEtl 20 CELL 20 40 COUNT f'.l)'JIH 18 18 36 16 16 32 14 14 25 12 12 24

~,,

10 10 ~,J 8 8 16 6 6 12

~

4 4 "

2 2 4 0 0 0 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 ES 7G 75 0 s 10 1s 20 2s 30 35 ~o 45 50 (i 10 15 20 25 30 35 4{' ~'i 50

% PASSING #3C SW'[ PAS<H:G f/51' :'.:IEE  % PASSING #100 SIEVE SPECIHCI\TION ur:rcs 25-60% SP[CIF'CATIC:' LIIT~ 10-~~& SPECIFICATION LIMITS 2-10%

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

,::;TE: .\LL (10(;%) P.1SSillG 3/8" SIEVE UNITS 1 and 2 JULY 31, 1980 BACKFILL - HISTOGRAM OF GRADA*

TION LIMITS FOR BEDDING SAND FIGURE 2. 5. 4-49

CELL CELL 10 CELL 10 COUNT COUNT COUNT 9 9 8 8

'1 l i---7 7 7 6~ 6 6 sl 5  !

5 11 4 ; 4  ! 4 1L.

3 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

% PASSING #4 SIEVE 85 90 l

95 100' 2

l 0

50 55 I I 60 65

' I 70 75 I J --,--1 80 85 90 95 100

% PASSING #8 SIEVE lJ l 50 55 ' I.

60 65 70 75 I

80 85 90

% PASSING #16 SIEVE I I I I 95 100 SPEC I FI :ATIOl'I LIMITS 95-100% SPECifICATION LIMITS 80-100% SPECIFICATION LI~lTS 50-85%

CELL CELL 10 -, CELL 10 -

'il courn COUNT COUNT  !

9 9 8 - 8 7 7 6 6 6 5-4-

-- 5 4

3 5

4 3

1--

3-2- 2 2 1

0 I 25 30 35 40 45 iI 50 I

55 60 I I 65 70 75 I

1 0

0 5 I

10 I

I 15 20 25 30 JS 40 45 50 1

0 0

7 5 10 15 20 25 I

30 35 40 45 50

% PASSING #30 SIEVE PI\SSH!G #50 sri:v::  % PASSING 11100 SIEVE SPEC I FIC,'\TION LIMITS 25-60% SPCCIFICATr'.)N LIMIT:; 10-30't SPEC I FrcATIOM LliHTS 2-10% COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DUCT BANK BACKFILL rlOTC: .\LL (100%) l'/\SSH:G 3/8" SIEV'.:

JULY 31, 1980 ~6 ~rR~§B~N8FsR~BDATION LIMITS FIGUflE 2.5.4-50

CELL 10 CELL 10 :

COUNT CELL 10 9 COUNT g COUNT \'.)

8 8 8 7 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 l i 1

i 0 +---,----,------1,** ... ., .L .. 0 +*****~-* I 0 +--t--+~+---t----+~t---+---r---i~

50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 5 10 15 20 25 3'0 35 40 45 50 55 PASSING l" SIEVE  % PASSING ',/ SIEVE  % PA'.;SING #4 SI EVE SPEC I Fl CATION Lil!ITS 50-85% SPECIFICATION LrnITs 25-65% SPECIFICATION LitlITS 15-50%

CELL 14 COUNT 13 12 11 10 CELL CELL COUNT 18 9

8 7

COUNT u

u 13 6

5 trg 4 8 3

2 1

i 3

2 0

1 0

0 50 5 10 45 50 PASSING #10 SIEVE  % PASSING /1100 SIEVE SPECIFICATiON LIMITS 5-40% SPECIFICATION LIMIT~ 0-10% COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 NOTE: ALL (100%) PASSING 2" SIEVE JULY 31, 1980 FIGURE 2.5.4-51

CELL n

20 CELL 10 CELL COUNT 19 COUNT COUNT n

15 14 9

8 16 15 7 14 13 12 6 H 11 1 5 lb9 4 8 7

3 g 2

~

OJ.-------+------+---+----+-----1-+--+~

I 0 _,_____,_--I--+--+-...._-+--+-+---

50 55 60 65 70 75 BO 85 90 95 100 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 10 15 20 2 5 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

% PASSING l" SIEVE  % PASSING 1/2" SIEVE  % PASSING #4 SIEVE SPEC! FI :ATION LIMITS 50-85% SPECIFICATION LitHTS 25-65% SPECIFICATION LIMITS 15-50%

CELL COUNT ii 25 CELL 24 COUNT 23 CELL re COUNT 13

~~

19 17 16 o-16 -

15 15 14 H

12 13 12 lb 9

i~

i

~1 g

4 3

2 -

6 J____J_-----+-------1-----+-~~~~ i -'---'---l---l-------------

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 0 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5() 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

% PASSING #100 SIEVE

% PAS,ING #10 SIEVE  % PASSING #40 SIEVE SPECIF!C,'\T!QN LIMITS 0-10% ~-------------1 SPECIFICATION LIM!TJ 5-40% SPECIFICATION LIMITS 0-20% COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 NOTE: ALL (100%) PASSING 2" SIEVE DUCT BANK TRENCH & MANHOLE JULY 31, 1980 BACKFILL - HISTOGRAM OF GRADA-TION LIMITS FOR CRUSHED ROCK FIGURE 2. 5 .4-52

ELL 10 CELL 10 CELL COUNT 10 COUNT OUNT 9 I 9 9 8 "~

8 8 7 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 5 ~

4 4 I- -

4 --

3 3 "-" 3 2

1 0 * *-- ~c wI 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

% PAS3ING 1" SIEVE 2

1 0

25

~7-,

30 35 n

40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

% PASSING ';" SIEVE 2

1 0

0 5 i- n 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

% PASSING #4 SIEVE 50 SPECIFICATION LIHITS 50-85% SPECIFICATION Llr!TS 25-65% SPECIFICATION LIMITS 15-50%

CELL 10 l CELL 10 CELL 10 -

COUNT 9--i COUNT COUNT 9 9

8 8 -*- 8 7 7 7 -

6 6 6 5 5 5 4 4 4 nrill7 3 3 3 2 2 '-"""'

I I I I 1 .

0 0 5 n

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 1

0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 I

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

% PAS;ING #10 SIEVE  % PA~SING #100 SIEV[

% PASSING #40 SIEVE SPECIFICATION LIMITS 0-100%

SPECIFICATION LIHITS 5-40% SPECIFICATION LIMITS 0-20% COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 t!OTE: ALL (100%) PASSING 2" SIEVE SURFACE WATER PIPE TRENCH 3ACK-JULY 31, 1980 FILL - HISTOGRAM OF GRADATION LIMITS FOR CRUSHED ROCK FIGURE 2.5.4-53

s::z He, y

He 2

~y O(h BACKFILL ROCK 1S't = tO pcf 1't = 10 pcf LOAD/LIN.FT. SOIL* SURCHARGE* WATER COMPACTION OF WALL 1S'w = 62. pcf Ko= 0. 7 1'w = 62. pcf Ko= 0.33 STATIC ,

<H11S'cH2 1 lS'.,

1 Ko4Hs 1/2H:lS'w 1/2 CTcHc 1

<Tc= 400 psf 6KAE : 0.04 (SSE)

DYNAMIC <~ ~-H:lS'wl 1/2AK" 6K**H1 O. 1(-L 12 O(hlt H1*,] -

O(h = 0.12 O (SSE)

COMBINED 1/2<H~ ~t-H~lf1)(1(0 +6*> <<o*AK.>H1 ¥~HI '1+0.820(h) 1/2<TcHc1 He,= 2 FT 6 0 03 Hc2 = FT K.a. * (oae)

  • APPLICABLE FOR Hz 'SH11 IF Hz> H,. Hz SHOULD BE TAKEN TO BE EQUAL 6KAE = 0.10 (SSE) och
  • 0.069 (oBE) TO H1 SINCE STANDING WATER DOES NOT AFFECT THE MAGNITUDE OF EFFECTIVE STRESS. COMANCHE PEAKS ES O(h : 0.12 0 (SSE) *
  • FOR UNIFORM SURCHARGE ONLY. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 6K.e a 0.05 (OBE)

UNITS 1 AND 2 O(h

STATIC ANO DYNAMIC LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES October 14, 1988

CIRC. WATER 7 B' 0

0 0

O>

lU I N TAKE S TR UC T URE O

~-----\ --------------------

~

~\

-EVAPORATION POND NO.

TO BE CLOSED AND ABANDONED IN PLACE 1-00 0

lNIOOOO 2D

  • 1
  • 17 TURBINE BUILDING AUXILIARY L ;- BUILDING 10

_j A **5 a I A' 2: *"

0 Ji ~I 0

Q 2: I 0

q a:

0 I 345 KV SW!TCHYARD 00 **

Q

~

lU lc.q 11.u

  • s 0

[]

AOMIN t

BLDG

_J AMENDMENT 87 DECEMBER 18, 1992 NOTE: PERMANENT PIEZOMETERS NUMBERED COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FROM 9 TO 25 //\:STALLED DEC. 1987 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOCATION OF PIEZOMETERS FIGURE 2.5.4-55

(

3~ <S"TE.e.L C.A.'5lt.J6.

~- _,-..

CEMENT/ BENl"CN\TE uR:::MJT s) t

"" ~

J tz. t.D, 'SCHED. 4o PV~ RISER CJ l

1* eENTc~1-re. 'SEA\..

\[) ..\> l

~

u..1 e-r

§ s" &RE.HOLE..

....._-+--- ID'Cl" SI..Cii'E.D ( O\Q 1~)

~HE.0. 4o PVC..

1==::::m-..-+--- E. ND f>\..Uu 9

~-----~----~---~COLOAAOOµ 6A.~D 2Q-4c MES\.\

PlE.ZOME.TER DE..1AlL Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSlS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PIEZOMETER DETAIL FIG. 2.5.4-56

fl N

  • Ill °'* -I *
  • 0 1* .

SPEC.IFIC.ATION

.LH-++--+ GS-& c.R\TEq:,1.,c,,.

HO &TR-Att-.lS ct t:>E!VELCPE.o IX Ol.)RJN&

1/)

(/) o.?,,

TEST--\@

1--4-!-+++-+--H-+-H+H++++++++

...,Vl~

COMANCHE PEAK S E.S.

FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Ol....l_._,.1...L...L..L.J..1...1..J...L...u......,_

I 6 10 !iO 100 UNITS 1 and 2 NUMSE:R OF C.. '(C.LE.S {N)

  • Cyclic 'Jriaxial Testing rr iut:.e1,ort Limestone Amendment 75 November 18, 1988 IL)', u re **
  • 5 . 4- 5 7