ML22227A174
| ML22227A174 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07201031 |
| Issue date: | 07/14/2023 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
| To: | NAC International |
| Bernie White NMSS/DFM/STL 301-415-6577 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML22220A149 | List:
|
| References | |
| Download: ML22227A174 (7) | |
Text
Enclosure 29 PRELIMINARY SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT NAC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
MAGNASTOR STORAGE SYSTEM DOCKET NO. 72-1031 REVISION TO AMENDMENT NOS. 0-8 Summary On January 21, 2022 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System [ADAMS]
Accession No. ML22021B305), the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a Severity Level IV violation to NAC International, Inc., (NAC) for performing an improper change to the safety analysis report (SAR) via the regulations in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 72.48, Changes, Tests, and Experiments. The violation identified that NAC failed to obtain an amendment to Certificate of Compliance No. 1031 for changes to the SAR to remove the requirements in American Concrete Institute (ACI) Code ACI 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete for fabrication of the MAGNASTOR concrete cask lid. Technical Specification A4.2, paragraph 3, in Amendment Nos. 0 - 9 requires that the American Concrete Institute Specifications ACI 349 and ACI 318 govern the CONCRETE CASK design and construction, respectively.
By application dated March 18, 2022 (ML22077A769), as supplemented on April 18, 2022 (ADAMS Accession No. ML22108A197), and August 4, 2022 (ADAMS Accession No. ML22216A110), NAC requested revisions to Amendment Nos. 0 - 8 for the Model No.
MAGNASTOR storage cask. NAC proposed to revise the certificates of compliance by adding a definition for the storage cask and concrete cask lid, revising the definition of concrete cask with conforming changes throughout appendix A of the technical specifications, and providing alternate fabrication criteria and techniques in Technical Specification A4.2 for the concrete cask lid.
The NRC staff reviewed the request for revision to the certificates of compliance using guidance in NUREG-2215, Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities -
Final Report, dated April 2020. For the reasons stated below and based on the statements and representations in NACs application, as supplemented, and the conditions specified in the certificate of compliance and the technical specifications, the staff concludes that the requested changes meet the requirements of 10 CFR Part 72, Licensing Requirements for the Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and Reactor-Related Greater Than Class C Waste.
MAGNASTOR Storage System General Description and Operational Features The MAGNASTOR system used to store spent fuel consists of a transfer cask, storage overpack, and a welded stainless steel transportable storage canister (TSC) that contains the spent fuel. In the storage configuration, the TSC is placed in the central cavity of the storage overpack. The storage overpack provides structural protection, radiation shielding, and internal airflow paths that remove the decay heat from the TSC surface by natural air circulation. The storage overpack also provides protection during storage for the TSC and the spent fuel it contains against adverse environmental conditions. The MAGNASTOR system is designed to accommodate storage of up to 37 pressurized-water reactor fuel assemblies or 89 boiling-water reactor (BWR) fuel assemblies.
The transfer cask is used to move the TSC between the workstations during TSC loading and preparation activities, and to transfer the TSC to or from the overpack. There are two approved designs for the transfer cask, the standard MAGNASTOR transfer cask (MTC) and the passive MAGNASTOR transfer cask (PMTC). The MTC provides shielding during TSC movements between workstations, the overpack, or the transport cask. It is a multiwall (carbon steel/lead/NS-4-FR/steel) design with retractable (hydraulically operated) bottom shield doors that are used during loading and unloading operations. There is a second version of the MTC, called the MTC2. The only difference from the MTC is that the MTC2 has stainless steel walls.
Storage Overpack The MAGNASTOR storage system includes variations of the concrete overpack, with differing dimensions to accommodate slightly different TSC designs. The concrete cask body is a right circular cylinder with a reinforced, structural concrete shield wall and a carbon steel inner liner and base. The reinforcing steel rebar is encased within the concrete. The concrete overpack contains inlet air vents at the bottom and outlet air vents at the top for convective air flow. The convective air flow removes decay heat from the TSC shell. There are three variations of the concrete overpack lid, two variations are shown in Drawing No. 77160-561, Sheets 3 and 5; and the third variation, added in Amendment No. 9 (ADAMS Accession No. ML20307A116), is shown on Drawing No. 71160-664.
Transportable Storage Canister The stainless steel TSC assembly holds the fuel basket structure and confines the contents.
There are two TSC lengths that contain the fuel baskets to hold pressurized-water reactor (PWR) and BWR fuel assemblies. The TSC is defined as the confinement boundary during storage.
There were no changes to the TSC in this amendment.
Drawings NAC did not submit any revised drawings for this amendment.
Proposed Changes NAC proposed to revise the certificates of compliance by adding a definition for the storage cask and concrete cask lid, revising the definition of concrete cask with conforming changes throughout appendix A of the technical specifications, and providing alternate fabrication criteria and techniques in Technical Specification A4.2 for the concrete cask lid. The new definitions treat the concrete cask and the concrete cask lid as separate components and allow separate fabrication requirements in the technical specifications. The storage cask is defined as the concrete cask and the concrete cask lid. The conforming changes throughout the appendix are to replace concrete cask with storage cask, when the action is on a loaded cask, to ensure that it includes both the lid and the cask body.
NAC revised technical specification appendix A, section 4.2 (technical specification A4.2) for the concrete cask lid includes the minimum concrete density, the allowable methods for measuring the density of the cask concrete lid, and requirements for the concrete mix, placement, and curing methods used in the construction of the concrete cask lid.
The technical specification changes are to ensure that the concrete in the cask lid has the physical properties (e.g., density, dimensions, geometry, internal structure) needed to perform its radiation shielding safety function as intended, while eliminating the requirement that the concrete in the cask lid comply with the ACI 349 and ACI 318. It should be emphasized that these ACI standards will remain in the technical specification for the design and fabrication of the concrete cask body.
The NRC staffs review of the application for revision to Amendment Nos. 0 thorough 8 addressed the following items for the concrete cask lid: construction criteria, structural function, concrete degradation mechanisms, and the radiation shielding evaluation accounting for shrinkage of the concrete in the cask lid. The staffs evaluation is addressed in the safety evaluation report (SER) sections below.
Concrete Cask Lid Construction The NRC staff reviewed the proposed changes to technical specification A4.2 for the concrete cask lid and noted that the proposed technical specification includes the following controls for the concrete used in the construction of the concrete cask lid:
The concrete shall, at minimum, be a commercial grade ready-mix type that can develop a density of 140 pounds per cubic foot (pcf).
The concrete mix and batching should meet the purchasers requirement for density and any additional purchaser-indicated attributes, such as air content, as allowed by ASTM International Standard ASTM C94, Standard Specification for Ready-Mixed Concrete.
The density of the concrete can be verified by either test method ASTM C138, Standard Test Method for Density (Unit Weight), Yield, and Air Content (Gravimetric) of Concrete, or an approved shop fabrication procedure by following the equation for density, where density is equal to weight divided by volume. The shop procedure shall include steps to weigh the lid before and after concrete placement and in calculating the actual volume of the cavity to be filled with a record of the weight of concrete placed into the cavity.
The concrete placement shall be in a dry and clean cavity or form with procedures and equipment that ensure the concrete placed is thoroughly consolidated and worked around any reinforcement and/or embedded fixtures and into the corners of the cavity or form.
The concrete shall be protected from the environment during curing to minimize development of cracks by one or more of various methods such as moist cure or liquid membrane forming chemicals. Type II Portland cement may be substituted by an alternate cement type for the concrete if the above density requirement can be met.
The staff noted that the current MAGNASTOR technical specifications (i.e., prior to the revision request) do not differentiate between the concrete cask and the concrete cask lid, and they require that the entirety of ACI 349 and ACI 318 govern the design and construction of the entire cask (including the lid). These ACI standards provide comprehensive and detailed requirements for the design and construction of structural concrete. The staff considered whether the more limited set of requirements proposed in technical specification A4.2 for the concrete in the cask lid, in lieu of the requirements of ACI 349 and ACI 318, are suitable to ensure that the lid can adequately perform its required safety function.
As addressed in the SER section below regarding the concrete cask lid structural function, the concrete used in the construction of the concrete cask lid has a radiation shielding safety function but no structural strength requirements. Section R3.3.1 of ACI 349 states that shielding requirements for concrete components are dependent on the density of the concrete. Section R1.4 of ACI 349 cites American National Standard Institute and American Nuclear Society (ANSI/ANS) 6.4, Nuclear Analysis and Design of Concrete Radiation Shielding for Nuclear Power Plants, as specific guidance for evaluating the radiation shielding effectiveness of concrete components. The staff verified that the technical specification minimum density of 140 pcf meets the minimum density requirement of ANSI/ANS-6.4 for concrete that performs a radiation shielding function.
The staff also verified that the proposed technical specification requirements for determining concrete density will ensure the measurement of concrete weight and volume are correctly performed and that the density is correctly calculated based on the measured weight divided by the measured volume. The staff noted that these methods are sufficient to ensure that the density of the concrete in the lid meets the technical specification requirement of 140 pcf.
Therefore, the staff determined that the proposed technical specification is acceptable for ensuring that the concrete in the lid will have the density needed to adequately perform its radiation shielding safety function.
For the commercial grade concrete in the lid to maintain physical characteristics needed to adequately perform the radiation shielding function, the staff identified that the finished concrete should not undergo unacceptable shrinkage, and it should remain free of significant defects (such as voids and cracks) that could cause unacceptable radiation streaming through the concrete in the lid. Therefore, in addition to density, the staff considered whether the proposed technical specification for construction of the concrete cask lid are adequate to ensure that the concrete can maintain the physical properties (i.e., lack of unacceptable shrinkage and lack of significant voids or cracks) needed to perform its radiation shielding safety function during the operating life of cask. The NRC staffs evaluation of concrete shrinkage that may result in a loss of radiation shielding performance is provided in the SER section below.
Concrete Cask Lid Structural Function The storage cask lid provides protection to the TSC from the external environment including any postulated tornado missiles strike and radiation shielding. The minimum lid thickness (3/4 inch) carbon steel cover plate spans the entire opening. The complete lid assembly is bolted to the top of the concrete cask. Drawing 71160-561, Rev. 9 Sheet 3 of 5 Section D-D shows a cross-section of the cask lid assembly with the alternate arrangement shown in Drawing 71160-561, Rev. 9 Sheet 5 of 5 Section E-E. The third lid configuration used with concrete cask number 6 is shown in Drawing No. 71160-664, Rev. 1P, Sheet 2 of 2.
The staffs evaluation of tornado missiles is in section 3.5.2 Tornado Wind and Tornado-Driven Missiles of the SER Amendment 0 (ADAMS Accession No. ML090350589). In that SER, the staff concurs with the SAR conclusion that for a 280 lb, 8-inch diameter armor piercing shell traveling at 185 ft/sec impacting the 3/4-inch carbon steel top plate lid assembly, the carbon steel lid is adequate in preventing plate perforation with a factor of safety of 1.15 (0.75/0.65 =1.15). The upper plate for the lid on concrete cask number 6 is 1 inch thick, which would yield a higher factor of safety.
The staff confirmed that there is no structural strength demand on the concrete in the cask closure lid whose sole function is to provide radiation shielding.
Concrete Shrinkage Concrete shrinkage is a reduction in the dimensions of a formed concrete component that occurs when hardened concrete dries from a saturated condition, as discussed in NUREG-2214, Managing Aging Processes In Storage (MAPS) Report. For concrete components of certain dimensions that are relied upon to provide radiation shielding (i.e., to reduce external dose rates to acceptable levels), concrete shrinkage may have the potential to cause a reduction in the dimensions of the component by an amount that results in unacceptable radiation streaming and unacceptable external dose rates. Concrete shrinkage occurs initially during curing and can be controlled through concrete formulation. According to ACI 209R, Prediction of Creep, Shrinkage, and Temperature Effects in Concrete Structures, over 90 percent of the shrinkage occurs during the first year, reaching 98 percent by the end of the first 5 years. Thus, concrete shrinkage is the most significant degradation mechanism that may impact radiation shielding performance of a concrete component during the initial years of storage following concrete fabrication, when the radioactivity of the spent fuel in dry storage is the highest.
In its March 18, 2022 (ADAMS Accession No. ML22077A769), supplement for the MAGNASTOR Amendment No. 12, NAC included an evaluation of the potential for concrete shrinkage. The applicant evaluated the potential effects that radial concrete shrinkage would have on the lids ability to perform its radiation shielding safety function. The applicants evaluation calculated an expected radial gap around the edge of the concrete cask lid due to shrinkage. The NRC staff compared the applicants calculation of the expected radial gap around the edge of the lid (0.02 inches) due to shrinkage to the data regarding maximum concrete shrinkage from NUREG-2214 and found the licensees calculation of the expected radial gap due to concrete shrinkage to be acceptable for the initial storage term. The staff determined that the proposed technical specification criteria for the concrete in the lid, including the requirement that the concrete mix and batching should meet the purchasers indicated attributes, as allowed by ASTM C94 for commercial grade ready-mixed concrete, are sufficient to ensure that the applicants calculation of expected radial shrinkage is a credible estimate of the actual shrinkage behavior that may be expected during the initial storage term.
The applicant also evaluated top surface dose rate profiles associated with conservative hypothetical radial gaps around the edge of the concrete cask lid due to shrinkage. The staff confirmed that the hypothetical radial gap values of 0.04 and 0.08 inches used for evaluating the top surface dose rate profiles are sufficiently conservative since they are well in excess of the expected radial shrinkage value of 0.02 inches that was calculated by the applicant, as discussed above. The NRC staffs review of the applicants radiation shielding evaluation for calculating the top surface dose rates is documented in the SER section below.
Other Concrete Degradation Mechanisms Over time, the concrete cask lid may be prone to other degradation mechanisms, in addition to shrinkage, that could potentially have adverse effects on its ability to perform its radiation shielding function. Since there is no structural strength demand for the concrete used in the lid, other degradation mechanisms of potential concern are those that could cause the concrete in the lid to develop flaws, such as voids or cracks, that could potentially cause an increase in radiation dose rates through the concrete in the lid.
Section 3.5.1, Concrete, of NUREG-2214 provides a generic evaluation of potential aging degradation mechanisms and associated aging effects for concrete used in storage overpacks.
While NUREG-2214 is typically used for addressing aging during renewals, the staff considered the information on concrete degradation mechanisms to assess whether the proposed changes to the technical specification for the concrete in the cask lid could potentially result in increased susceptibility to deterioration that could have adverse effects on the ability of the lid to perform its radiation shielding safety function during the initial storage term.
Given that the concrete in both cask lid designs in Amendment Nos. 0 through 8 is encased in carbon steel, there is very little potential for intrusion of significant water, moisture, and dissolved compounds into the concrete due to exposure of the lid top surface to weather and debris. The only degradation mechanisms that are potentially credible for non-structural encased concrete used for radiation shielding are shrinkage (addressed in the SER section above), dehydration at high temperature, and delayed ettringite formation (DEF). Dehydration at high temperature could potentially contribute to cracking and may further exacerbate concrete shrinkage at sufficiently high temperatures if the concrete is not adequately fabricated.
Considering the limit on the maximum bulk concrete temperature specified in the final safety analysis report (FSAR), and the fact that fuel temperature decreases over time, the staff confirmed that the proposed technical specification criteria for the concrete are sufficient to ensure that the concrete in the cask lid will not be prone to unacceptable cracking or additional shrinkage beyond that already addressed above. DEF is a degradation mechanism characterized by the early-stage conversion of the mineral ettringite to monosulfoaluminate during curing at sufficiently high temperatures (greater than about 158 °F), and subsequent reconversion back to ettringite after the concrete hardens. This degradation mechanism may lead to concrete volume expansion and increased internal residual stresses, which could result in concrete cracking and spalling. As addressed in NUREG-2214, DEF of concrete is not considered credible for dry storage casks in outdoor, sheltered, below-grade, and fully encased environments, provided that adequate concrete placement and curing standards, such as those in ACI 349 and ACI 318, are followed. While the proposed technical specification change eliminates these ACI standards, the staff confirmed that the specification of ASTM C94 for ready-mixed concrete and the additional specification that concrete shall be protected from the environment during curing are sufficient to ensure that DEF is unlikely to cause degradation that results in unacceptable loss of radiation shielding performance during the operating life of the cask.
Considering the potential degradation mechanisms, the staff determined that proposed technical specification for the concrete cask lid is sufficient to ensure that the concrete in the lid will maintain the physical properties needed to adequately perform its radiation shielding safety function.
Shielding Evaluation The applicant performed an evaluation to estimate the effects on dose rate due to concrete shrinkage on the MAGNASTOR overpack lid. The evaluation focuses on the potential effects that any radial concrete shrinkage would have on the lids ability to perform its radiation shielding safety function. In NACs supplemental Report No. W220318t024202, Potential Concrete Radial Shrinkage, the applicant stated that based on publicly available literature, for every 100 ft of concrete there is about 0.6 inches of shrinkage. Applying this approach to the MAGNASTOR overpack concrete top lid yields approximately 0.039 inches of shrinkage on the diameter [78.5 inches x (0.6 in./(100 ft x 12 inches)) = 0.039 inches], which is equivalent to about a 0.02-inch radial gap around the edge of the concrete cask lid. As discussed above in Concrete Shrinkage, the staff finds this approach acceptable.
NAC performed dose rates analysis taking FSAR revision 0 (ADAMS Accession No. ML091030364) dose rates from NAC Calculation No. 71160-5014. Dose rates for base cases represent a full spectrum run and response solution, as described in the NAC FSAR.
NAC used MCNP6 to calculate the dose rates at the top lid. MCNP is a general-purpose Monte Carlo N-Particle code that can be used for neutron, photon, electron, or coupled neutron/photon/electron transport. Specific areas of application include, but are not limited to, radiation protection and radiation shielding.
The applicants use of a 0.04-and 0.08-inch radial gap is well in excess of the 0.02-inch maximum expected radial gap, previously discussed in the first paragraph of this portion of the SER. The applicant found that the shrinkage does result in an increase in the absolute value for dose rates, however, all dose rate results fall within the statistical uncertainty band of the original calculations, and therefore are not significant enough that they would impact either occupational doses or site-boundary dose limits.
The staff reviewed the methodology employed by the applicant and found them acceptable based on the facts that they used a radial gap that is larger than the 0.02 in, showing that the increase in dose rate is not significant enough that it would exceed either occupational doses or site-boundary limits. The staff agrees that the results fall within the statistical uncertainty band of the original solutions, and therefore no offsite or occupational dose analyses are needed. The staff also found acceptable the use of MCNP based on facts that this computer code has commonly been used previously in NRC approvals for the MAGNASTOR system and is appropriate for this evaluation.
The staff concludes that the shielding and radiation protection design features of the MAGNASTOR system, including the changes to the requirements in appendix A of the technical specifications for the concrete cask lid are in compliance with 10 CFR Part 72, and that the applicable design and acceptance criteria continue to be satisfied. The evaluation of the concrete lid in terms of shielding and radiation protection design features provides reasonable assurance that the system will still provide shielding and radiation protection from the spent fuel.
This finding is based on the applicable regulations, appropriate regulatory guides, applicable codes and standards, the applicants analyses, the staffs evaluations, and acceptable engineering practices.
Conclusion Based on the discussion above, the NRC concludes that the revised technical specifications in appendix A are sufficient to minimize concrete shrinkage and degradation such that the dose to any real individual beyond the controlled area and the occupational doses from the storage cask are bounded by previous analyses. Therefore, based on the statements and representations provided by the applicant in its amendment application, as supplemented, the staff concludes that the changes described above to the MAGNASTOR system do not affect the ability of the storage cask system to meet the requirements of 10 CFR Part 72. Revision to Amendment Nos.
0 through 8 for the MAGNASTOR system should be approved.
Issued with Certificate of Compliance No. 1031, Amendment No. 0, revision No. 2, Amendment No. 1, revision No. 2, Amendment No. 2, revision No. 2, Amendment No. 3, revision No. 2, Amendment No. 4, revision No. 1, Amendment No. 5, revision No. 1, Amendment No. 6, revision No. 1, Amendment No. 7, revision No. 1, and Amendment No. 8, revision No. 1, on ___draft______