ML22158A309
| ML22158A309 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi |
| Issue date: | 11/03/2020 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | DTE Energy |
| Baker R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19128A204 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML22158A309 (1) | |
Text
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Fermi 2 Date of Exam:12-7-2020 Scenario Numbers:
1 / 2
/3 Operating Test No.:2020-1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a
b*
c#
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, 9r
-M ~
but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
IN 111 ~
- 3.
Each event description consists of the following:
the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
. ~
NI the expected operator actions (by shift position)
If the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
tJ-. "' e~
- 5.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete
()..
~
evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
r'1
- 6.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
I)-
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
~
Cues are given.
1\\4
- 7.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
f)
N'I t'~
- 8.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance IJ-deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional
~ M fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 9.
Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
0- "'
~
If
- 10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the
' ~
form along with the simulator scenarios).
rt
- 11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable I}-
tsl:
rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
~
- 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified I)-
?~
on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
I"
- 13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when Ir
~
possible.
fl"\\
- 14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
ff M ~
Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d)
Actual Attributes
- 1.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 / 1 / 1 fr "'
~J:,
- 2.
Abnormal events (2-4) 3/2/2 ff -
?st)
- 3.
Major transients (1-2) 2 / 1 / 2 (Y.
"' l<f~
- 4.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/2/2 tr All ~
- 5.
Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions ~ 1 per scenario 0/ 1 / 1 I
~~
set)
A M
- 6.
Preidentified critical tasks ~ 2) 2 / 2/2 Cf I.M ~
- The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
- An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.