ML22158A309

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Fer 2020 Ile Es 301-4 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist
ML22158A309
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/03/2020
From:
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
DTE Energy
Baker R
Shared Package
ML19128A204 List:
References
Download: ML22158A309 (1)


Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Fermi 2 Date of Exam:12-7-2020 Scenario Numbers:

1 / 2

/3 Operating Test No.:2020-1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, 9r

-M ~

but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

IN 111 ~

3.

Each event description consists of the following:

the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

. ~

NI the expected operator actions (by shift position)

If the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

tJ-. "' e~

5.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete

()..

~

evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

r'1

6.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

I)-

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

~

Cues are given.

1\\4

7.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

f)

N'I t'~

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance IJ-deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional

~ M fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

0- "'

~

If

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the

' ~

form along with the simulator scenarios).

rt

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable I}-

tsl:

rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

~

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified I)-

?~

on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

I"

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when Ir

~

possible.

fl"\\

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

ff M ~

Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d)

Actual Attributes

1.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 / 1 / 1 fr "'

~J:,

2.

Abnormal events (2-4) 3/2/2 ff -

?st)

3.

Major transients (1-2) 2 / 1 / 2 (Y.

"' l<f~

4.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/2/2 tr All ~

5.

Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions ~ 1 per scenario 0/ 1 / 1 I

~~

set)

A M

6.

Preidentified critical tasks ~ 2) 2 / 2/2 Cf I.M ~

  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
  1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.