ML22147A183
| ML22147A183 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 04/13/2022 |
| From: | Heather Gepford Operations Branch IV |
| To: | Entergy Operations |
| References | |
| Download: ML22147A183 (3) | |
Text
Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 3 PROPOSED OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility:
ANO1 First Exam Date:
4/4/2022 Written Exam Outline (11/18/21)
Comment Resolution 1 NRC Generated 2 Modify to incorporate 6 GFES questions per Rev. 12 of NUREG-1021 Modified 3
4 5
Administrative JPM Outline (11/18/21)
Comment Resolution 1 All - RO Admins need to be idd as A1-4 and SRO as A5-9 Revised 2 RO - Administration date is wrong (4/4/2020)
Revised 3 RO - A2 was on last exam (need to note)
Replaced with new JPM 4 RO - A3 was on 2016 exam 5 RO - A4 was on 2014 exam 6 SRO - A6 - breech should be breach
- On 2014 exam Replaced with new JPM 7
SRO A7 - Title of JPM cues that task cannot be approved (should not contain if statement). Suggest change title to Review the Tagout Provided for P-36B Makeup Pump Seal Leak for Approval.
- On 2016 exam JPM Revised 8 SRO A8 - On 2014 exam 9
SRO-A9 - ensure event classification not too similar to ones performed on previous exams Ensured 10 At least 2/3 of Admin JPMs appear to have been on the last four exams -
please provide explanation as to how this satisfies intent to not have excessive repetition from previous exams JPMs sufficiently revised
OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 3 Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (11/18/21)
Comment Resolution 1
SRO-Us have only the minimum alternate path JPMs (2). Suggest SRO-Us do the alternate path JPM in-plant so they have minimum +1 and also have an in-plant alternate path JPM Adjusted 2
Ensure the modified JPMs have significant and substantial modifications such that they are not essentially the same task (d and f)
Ensured D modified sufficiently; F replaced 3 JPM a - on 2014 exam 4 JPM b - on 2014 exam Made new alternate path JPM 5 JPM d - modified from 2014 exam 6 JPM f - modified from 2016 exam Made new alternate path JPM 7 JPM g - on 2014 exam 8 JPM h - On 2020 exam 9 JPM j - On 2018 exam. Turbine missing in JPM title at end Revised title 10 JPM k on 2018 exam 11 There appears to be a lot of repetition from previous exams. Would like to see at least one new JPM?
Made changes as noted above Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (11/18/21)
Comment Resolution 1
All - Critical tasks need detailed explanations regarding safety significance and explanation for bounding criteria, Cueing, Measurable Performance Indicators, and Performance Feedback. Also need note about the possibility of a post scenario critical task. Attaching an example of a typical scenario CT explanation.
Added 2
All - D1s need three lines on top to annotate three examiners and three applicants Revised 3
All - Ensure all TS calls are clearly defined (all applicable TS idd with their respective condition/action items and time limits). Also, there should be NO TS calls during or after the major Revised
OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 3 transient. A table listing all TS information would be great 4
All - each scenario should have a summary (table) indicating 1) number of malfunctions after EOP entry, 2) number of abnormal events, 3) number of major transients, 4) number of EOPs entered requiring substantive actions, 5) number of entries into contingency EOPs with substantive actions, and 6) number of preidentified critical tasks Revised to add 5
Scenario 1 - There has been a PZR level instrument fail high/low on all of the last three exams. Something different, please Changed to RCS pressure failing low 6 Scenario 3 - two event 7s?
Events renumbered 7
Scenario 3 - it appears events 1, 2, 4, 5, and 8 were all run on last exam?
(maybe it was a spare and not used?)
Events 2, 5, and 8 sufficiently modified.