ML22140A309

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
bush-goddards-hv-w12
ML22140A309
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/08/2022
From: Stephanie Bush-Goddard
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML22140A309 (18)


Text

Unmanned Autonomous Vehicles (UAV) for Decommissioning Section Number W12 Stephanie Bush-Goddard, Ph.D.

Senior Health Physicist Radiation Protection Branch Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

Agenda Study Introduction and Goals Methodology Drone Flight Data Analysis Conclusions

Regulatory Requirements

  • TEDE < 25 mrem/year and ALARA Guidance Documents Regulations
  • NUREG-1575: Multi-Agency Radiation and Guidance Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM)
  • NUREG-1507: Minimum Detectable Concentrations with Typical Radiation Survey for Instruments for Various Contaminants and Field Conditions
  • NUREG-1757: Consolidated Decommissioning Guidance

Proof of Concept and Key Questions for Analysis Did observed UAV paths differ from human planned paths?

Did survey deviation impact survey results?

Were radiological measurements from human and UAV surveys significantly different?

Aurelia X6 Drone and Payload Sources and Flight Path Source Position 2 cm Cs-137 Button/Check Source Legend Start Path End Path Source Location Source Flight Path Background Flight Path PNNLs 3440 Outside Test

Scanning Technique Attribute Predicted Actual Height 5-15 cm 3-100 cm Speed 0.2-1 m/s 0.2 m/s

UAV Flight Center of Gravity Determination

=

Background===

Measurements

Human Simulation Data Logger and Detection of Sources

Q1 Results: UAV Paths vs. Human Paths?

Statistical equivalence between UAV and human paths Max slope deviation of 1.9

Q2 Results: Survey Deviation Impacts?

Velocity Variation Altitude Variation Greatest for drone

+/-0.3 m/s in all surveys Between 1.8-2.6 m/s for Higher altitude surveys human and UAV had less variation

Q3 Results: Significant Differences in Radiological Measurements?

Overall Conclusions UAV has potential in Ludlum detectors work Commercially available decommissioning well in low and high equipment able to altitudes perform surveys

Recommendations for Next Steps Optimize integration of radiation detection instruments Consider other radionuclides and detector types Address environmental condition variation in experimental development

Project Team Name Technical Need Stephanie Bush-Goddard/Vered Shaffer (deputy)/Jessica Strongin* Program Manager/NRC COR John Tomon NRC Branch Chief Tara ONeil/Katie Wagner (deputy) PNNL Program Manager Amoret Bunn PNNL Principal Investigator Steve Maheras Decommissioning SME (PNNL)

Tracy Ikenberry Health Physics SME (PNNL)

Harish Gadey*/Eric Becker/Dutch Dutcher/Emily Arredondo* Radiation Detection SME (PNNL)

John Jes Smart/Kameron Markham*/Luke Placzek*/Shane Foss UAV SME (PNNL)

Jayson Martinez, Brianna Friedman* UAV Pilot; Visual Observer (PNNL)

Deb Fagan/Moses Obiri*/Kelly OMalley* Data Analyst (PNNL)

Josh Torgenson Payload Specialist/3D Printer Kevin Litke/Jon Ray PNNL Aviation Safety POC

  • denotes intern or co-op

Thank you.

This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA