|
|---|
Category:Note to File incl Telcon Record
MONTHYEARML22059A0752022-02-0909 February 2022
Signed Axial Retainer Conversation Record
ML21049A3042021-05-0606 May 2021
Final Ea/Fonsi Memorandum for the Smud Initial and Updated Decommissioning Funding Plans Submitted in Accordance with 10 CFR 72.30(B) and (C) for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station'S Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
ML19354A6762019-12-0505 December 2019
NRC 699 12-5-2019 Call W Smud on Proposed License Conditions, Signed
ML19280B2502019-09-30030 September 2019
Conversation Record with D. Tallman/Smud Discuss California Department of Fish and Wildlife Recommendations for the California Tiger Salamander, Conversation Held on September 24, 2019
ML19165A2462019-06-14014 June 2019
06/14/2019, Conversation Record with D. Tallman/Smud Rancho Seco ISFSI License Renewal Application: Clarification to RAI Response, Conversation Held on 06/04/2019
ML19037A4462019-02-0606 February 2019
02/06/2019, Conversation Record with D. Tallman/Sacramento Municipal Utility District Rancho Seco ISFSI License Renewal Application: Clarifications to FSAR and RAI Response Docket No. 72-11 and SNM-2510, Conversation Held on January 30, 201
ML18331A0322018-11-21021 November 2018
Conversation Held with D. Tallman/Smud Discuss Draft Request for Additional Information on Rancho Seco Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Renewal Application and Clarification (Dkt: 72-11, SNM-2510) Conv. Held on Nov. 15, 2018)
ML18267A0132018-09-20020 September 2018
9/20/2018, Conversation Record with D. Tallman/Smud Call to Assist NRC Technical Staff in Obtaining Information, Which Will Be Used to Support Review of Rancho Seco ISFSI Renewal Application, Conversation Held on September 12, 2018
ML18215A3702018-08-0303 August 2018
08/03/2018, Conversation Record with D. Shaw (Tn) Discuss Declared Proprietary Information in License Renewal Application (Conversation Held on July 20, 2018)
ML18149A5722018-05-29029 May 2018
Conversation Record with D. Tallman Et. Al/Sacramento Municipal Utility District Discuss Draft Technical Request for Supplemental Information and Observation on Rancho Seco Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Renewal Application
2022-02-09
[Table view]
Category:Verbal Comm
MONTHYEARML22059A0752022-02-0909 February 2022
Signed Axial Retainer Conversation Record
ML21049A3042021-05-0606 May 2021
Final Ea/Fonsi Memorandum for the Smud Initial and Updated Decommissioning Funding Plans Submitted in Accordance with 10 CFR 72.30(B) and (C) for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station'S Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
ML19354A6762019-12-0505 December 2019
NRC 699 12-5-2019 Call W Smud on Proposed License Conditions, Signed
ML19280B2502019-09-30030 September 2019
Conversation Record with D. Tallman/Smud Discuss California Department of Fish and Wildlife Recommendations for the California Tiger Salamander, Conversation Held on September 24, 2019
ML19165A2462019-06-14014 June 2019
06/14/2019, Conversation Record with D. Tallman/Smud Rancho Seco ISFSI License Renewal Application: Clarification to RAI Response, Conversation Held on 06/04/2019
ML19037A4462019-02-0606 February 2019
02/06/2019, Conversation Record with D. Tallman/Sacramento Municipal Utility District Rancho Seco ISFSI License Renewal Application: Clarifications to FSAR and RAI Response Docket No. 72-11 and SNM-2510, Conversation Held on January 30, 201
ML18331A0322018-11-21021 November 2018
Conversation Held with D. Tallman/Smud Discuss Draft Request for Additional Information on Rancho Seco Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Renewal Application and Clarification (Dkt: 72-11, SNM-2510) Conv. Held on Nov. 15, 2018)
ML18267A0132018-09-20020 September 2018
9/20/2018, Conversation Record with D. Tallman/Smud Call to Assist NRC Technical Staff in Obtaining Information, Which Will Be Used to Support Review of Rancho Seco ISFSI Renewal Application, Conversation Held on September 12, 2018
ML18215A3702018-08-0303 August 2018
08/03/2018, Conversation Record with D. Shaw (Tn) Discuss Declared Proprietary Information in License Renewal Application (Conversation Held on July 20, 2018)
ML18149A5722018-05-29029 May 2018
Conversation Record with D. Tallman Et. Al/Sacramento Municipal Utility District Discuss Draft Technical Request for Supplemental Information and Observation on Rancho Seco Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Renewal Application
2022-02-09
[Table view] |
Text
NRC FORM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (11-2017)
CONVERSATION RECORD NAME OF PERSON(S)/TITLE CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU DATE OF CONTACT TYPE OF CONVERSATION Brad Gacke, Brian Gutherman and David 02/09/2022 E-MAIL Schwarzbart E-MAIL ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER TELEPHONE INCOMING (301) 576-2978 OUTGOING ORGANIZATION DOCKET NUMBER(S)
Sacramento Municipal Utility District 72-11 LICENSE NAME AND NUMBER(S) MAIL CONTROL NUMBER(S)
SNM-2510 SUBJECT Aging Management Inspection Discussion
SUMMARY
AND ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)
NRC
Participants:
Chris Allen, Marlone Davis, Darrell Dunn and Patrick Koch The call began at approximately 1:00 P.M. Eastern Standard Time. During the call, it was explained that most of the canister surfaces that Rancho Seco planned to inspect could be examined remotely by sending a robotic camera into the Horizontal Storage Module through the bottom vent. However, the canister bottom, where the grapple ring was located, could only be examined by removing either an axial retainer bolted to the Horizontal Storage Module door, or by removing the door itself. Since canister components that Rancho Seco had identified as being within the scope of aging management in their License Renewal Application were located at the bottom of the canister, Rancho Seco wanted to clarify if the safety evaluation report issued with the renewed license authorized removal of the axial retainer or if it simply confirmed that Rancho Seco had accurately identified components within the aging management scope. The NRC stated that the components within the scope of the aging management program were included in the license renewal application. However, because the license renewal application did not include inspection procedures or request NRC approval for removing the axial retainer, the NRC did not make a finding on the procedures to inspect either the canister bottom or the grapple ring. Rancho Seco stated that they would attempt to find an analysis evaluating the safety impacts associated with removing the axial retainer, or if they were unsuccessful, they would consider performing their own independent analysis. Rancho Seco also stated that they would perform a 72.48 evaluation to determine if removing the axial retainer would require a license amendment. The call concluded at approximately 1:45 P.M. Eastern Standard Time.
NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Chris Allen SIGNATURE DATE OF SIGNATURE 02/24/2022 NRC Form 699 (11-2017) Page 1 of 1