ML22055A467

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRC Form 699 Clarification Call 02-22-2022 Re Draft Tn Supplemental Response to RAI for Coc No. 1042 Amendment 3
ML22055A467
Person / Time
Site: 07201042
Issue date: 02/22/2022
From: Christian Jacobs
Storage and Transportation Licensing Branch
To:
TN Americas LLC
Chris Jacobs NMSS/DFM/STL 301-415-6825
Shared Package
ML22055A464 List:
References
Download: ML22055A467 (2)


Text

NRC FORM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE OF SIGNATURE (03-2013)

CONVERSATION RECORD 02/23/2022 NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU DATE OF CONTACT TYPE OF CONVERSATION E-MAIL Glenn Mathues 02/22/2022 TELEPHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER INCOMING glenn.mathues@orano.group (410) 910-6538 OUTGOING ORGANIZATION DOCKET NUMBER(S)

TN Americas LLC (TN) 72-1042 LICENSE NUMBER(S) CONTROL NUMBER(S)

CoC 1042 EOS Amendment #3 SUBJECT Clarification Call regarding draft TN supplemental response to request for additional information (RAI) 10-1 for Certificate of Compliance (CoC) No. 1042 Amd. #3.

SUMMARY

Participants:

TN: Glenn Mathues, Don Shaw, David Olson, Raheel Haroon, Hoi Yee Tom NRC: Christian Jacobs, Darrell Dunn, Omar Khan, Earl Love Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)

TN to provide revised responses and/or revised Safety Analysis Report (SAR) sections related to RAI 10-1 by February 25, 2022.

Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Christian Jacobs SIGNATURE NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

Page 1 of 2

NRC FORM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (03-2013)

CONVERSATION RECORD (continued)

SUMMARY

(Continued from page 1)

A clarification call was held on February 22, 2022, with TN staff.

TN provided draft supplemental responses to RAI 10-1 (See attached enclosures: public and non-public proprietary versions).

NRC questioned whether the calibration block is representative to detect flaws mentioned in the RAI response?

TN responded that they have chosen and picked surfaces that are the most difficult/challenging to detect flaws.

NRC requested that TN provide an explanation in their response indicating the actual surface that TN is interested in, and how TN is going to conduct the measurement.

TN will provide an example (reflector #7 or #8 or #9) from the top or bottom notch, and an example (reflector #1 or #2 ) of one of the side drilled holes.

Any correspondence or transmittal of supplemental information should include the following:

CAC: 001028 Docket: 72-1042 EPID: L-2021-LLA-0055 NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

Page 2 of 2

NRC FORM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (03-2013)

CONVERSATION RECORD (continued)

ACTION REQUIRED (Continued from page 1)

NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)

Page 3 of